> On 15 Jan 2019, at 12:56, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 5:33:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
> > On 14 Jan 2019, at 20:27, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> > wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 1/14/2019 3:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: 
> >> The physics comes from the first person statistical interference between 
> >> those dreams. 
> > 
> > Where can this "person" be to make a statisical inference, if there are 
> > only the dreams? 
> > 
> 
> That person makes the inference in the dreams, and test them in the mean 
> (most normal, in the Gaussian sense) consistent extensions where it 
> consciousness differentiate. 
> 
> Those dream are not “nocturnal” type of dream. A dream here is just a 
> computation supporting a Löbian machine, which itself supports a person ([]p 
> &p). The measure one is given either by []p & p (p sigma_1), or just []p & 
> <>t. “[]p” alone cannot work, because G adds “cul-de-sac world” at any 
> transition, and we have to get rid of them, to get the default hypotheses 
> used in probability or credibility theory. 
> 
> We do reverse engineering somehow. We extract the geometry of the universe 
> (the accessibility relations) from the modal logic of the 
> observable/predictable, which is derived from the “material variants” of G 
> (mainly Z). 
> 
> With mechanism, there are no other way, unless adding a magical selection 
> principle, but that would make impossible to trust any digitalist doctors. 
> Would you say yes to a doctor who says that the transplant needs some prayer? 
> 
> Bruno 
> 
> 
> 
> But what exactly counts as a digital implant?
> 
>  Likely, neurosurgeons in the future will be replacing neurons and groups of 
> neurons in human brains with synthetic neurons made of some sort of 
> materials, perhaps including silicon, but also biopolymers …


An implant can be said digital if it is emulable at the relevant substitution 
level (that we cannot know for sure, that is why it is a sort of bet).

If the primitive matter plays a role, it has to be non Turing emulable at all, 
but there are no evidences for this, and some contrary evidences do exist.

Bruno



> 
> - pt
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to