On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 4:20:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> > On 2 Aug 2019, at 00:57, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 8/1/2019 5:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: 
> >> This is the tour de force of the Theaetetus definition when applied in 
> the Mechanist frame: it explains why machines are necessarily confronted 
> with things which are not only not computable, but not representable in any 
> third person way. 
> >> The corresponding logic (the modal logic of [1]p, with [1]p defined by 
> []p & p), i.e. S4Grz is a formal logic describing a non formalisable 
> reality accessed by all (sound) machine. Yes, that is a (meta- tour de 
> force, made possible tanks to Gödel completeness and Incompleteness 
> theorem, together with Tarski un-definability of truth theorem  (and 
> Scott-Montague un-definability of knowledge theorem). 
> >> 
> >> Qualia are non physical and non numerical, yet phenomenologically real 
> and explained or “meta-explained”, like for consciousness. 
> > 
> > But this is not at all convincing.  Just because some things (reflective 
> relations) are not computable by the prefect logic machine does not show 
> they are models or instances of qualia. Qualia are perceptions for example, 
> which are partly shareable. 
>
> We share only the number relations. Not the qualia itself. We only 
> projects ours on others, when enough similar to us. 
>
> The machine qualia are not just non computable, they are non definable and 
> obey to a logic of qualia known before we found it in the discourse of the 
> machines.  They have a conical perceive field associated with them. A good 
> paper is the paper on quantum logic by John Bell (not the physicists, but 
> the logician). There are some mistake in that paper, but not relevant here. 
>
> Bell, J. L. (1986). A new approach to quantum logic. Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 
> 37:83-99. 
>
> Bruno 
>
>
>
If qualia are not "number relations" then they must be substances on their 
own.

And what is substance that is (at least partly) non-numerical: matter.

@philipthrift 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/abfea10f-22b1-4225-aeeb-ad69bcf25e8b%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to