On 1/27/2020 10:42 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:

The bottom line for why*IIT fails*:

If there are no experiences (experiential units, constituents, whatever) - wherever they may be in nature, assumedly in brains - to process, there is nothing to be integrated in the first place.


No, it fails because it doesn't agree with the common sense assessment of what is conscious and what is not.  From Scott's blog:

/For we can easily interpret IIT as trying to do something more “modest” than solve the Hard Problem, although still staggeringly audacious.  Namely, we can say that IIT “merely” aims to tell us which physical systems are associated with consciousness and which aren’t, purely in terms of the systems’ physical organization. The test of such a theory is whether it can produce results agreeing with “commonsense intuition”: for example, whether it can affirm, from first principles, that (most) humans are conscious; that dogs and horses are also conscious but less so; that rocks, livers, bacteria colonies, and existing digital computers are not conscious (or are hardly conscious); and that a room full of people has no “mega-consciousness” over and above the consciousnesses of the individuals./

Brent
@philipthrift


On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 12:12:52 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:



    It seems that

    https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1799
    
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scottaaronson.com%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D1799&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFkrIgncRPq5YjsNnBBL1uJbVLygQ>

          (written 6 years ago)

     and

    https://philpapers.org/rec/MRCICI <https://philpapers.org/rec/MRCICI>

        (2019)

    are in agreement in terms of their*information processing* criticism.

    @philipthrift

    On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 11:49:54 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:

        On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Philip Thrift
        <[email protected]> wrote:


            What is Scott Aaronson's counterexample to IIT?


        A simple search on Aaronson's blog gives many hits. Perhaps
        the most relevant is:

        https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1799
        
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scottaaronson.com%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D1799&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFkrIgncRPq5YjsNnBBL1uJbVLygQ>

            Is he in agreement with Mørch?


        No.

        Bruce

            @philipthrift

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0e223772-7512-4b9c-8f22-4d0632cdb0e0%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0e223772-7512-4b9c-8f22-4d0632cdb0e0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ffdb0988-41b8-5df0-7419-d1549f9b00ca%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to