>
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > categorically deny that these states of consciousness are possible 
> > > > > for anyone doing TM.You could even opine that TM practitioners can't 
> > > > > go beyond asmita because they indulge in laya during meditation.>
> > > > >
> > > 
> > > Imagine Vaj on one extreme and Bevan Morris on the other joining hands 
> > > over a joint-declaration about the positive value of meditation without a 
> > > little reconciliation of position.  Evidently the ultra-buddhists like 
> > > Vaj out in the world are saying TM can't happen and is no good, the 
> > > ultra-TM'ers are arguing that buddhism by definition is concentration in 
> > > practice and hence concentration as a meditation practice is no good 
> > > (second TM introductory prep-lecture).  Could they ever get together on 
> > > something larger?
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> > It's funny, each given their own experience, could ultra-Buddhists and 
> > ultra-TM'ers get together to issue a joint-statement that meditation is 
> > good and that meditation not only ought to be practiced but that it should 
> > be practiced, for instance as public policy in all public schools for good 
> > reasons of neurophysiology. 
> > 
> >
> 
> Without a fundamental fight over which meditation would be better?  It's been 
> going on for 50 years ever since Maharishi came to the West marketing 
> meditation in the meditation market-place.    
> 
>

It seems that both camps actively work at denying each the other's experience.  
Like a spiritual warfare is going on over the hearts and minds of the 
meditation market.  
 
> > >  
> > > > > Almost couldn't believe my ears when I once heard 'laya' pronounced
> > > > > by Maharishi as the Finnish word 'läjä' (j = y in yes; ä ~= a in 
> > > > > cat), meaning 'a heap'. The expression 'lehmän läjä' (a cow's heap) 
> > > > > has a somewhat specialiced meaning:
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Do the finnish have a version that rolls off the tongue like, 
> > > > 'bull-shit'?
> > > >  
> > > > > http://tinyurl.com/6hkztgg
> > > > > 



Reply via email to