R: > If someone made a false or misleading statement about you, would you > want to let it stand or would you want people to know the truth? Of > course you would you want the truth. Dollars to donuts, Judy would be > the first to defend your honor and you would thank her for it. In > veritate victoria: "In truth, triumph."
It's an interesting example that you bring up here Raunchy. I believe you have taken the position that there are people (here) who don't deserve to have the record corrected when a misrepresentation has been made against them. Or at least by the person who made the misrepresentation. And that is exactly the point I am making. How strong can one's committment be to truth, when it is so often trumped by personal animosities? S: > Of course I would want her to stand up for me in that situation. And in > many cases I have seen her do that for me and others. But in many other > instances I have seen her display tremendous partisonship in disputes > where, at least in my opinon, the truth is far away from the position > she is taking. Again, just my opinion. >
