--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > Supplying some mental floss for this exchange and just 
> > in case Judy's use of quotation marks is obfuscating, 
> > I'm sure it's not me she is quoting as I did not write 
> > those words. Or even think them. Maybe herself? Or 
> > someone from another decade?
> > 
> > PS I'd rather be a supposed "pompous, reality-avoiding 
> > dormouse" than a rageful, reality-obfuscating dirty 
> > fighter. BTW, The previous sentence shows the clean 
> > fighting way of using quotation marks as the words 
> > enclosed therein were actually written by a FFL poster. 
> 
> I think we may need a ruling from the judges on 
> this one, as to whether the use of quote marks 
> around your own words indicates an attempt to imply 
> they're someone else's. That sounds like a fairly 
> strong charge to level against someone without the 
> opinion of an expert. Couldn't they just be italics? 
> Is there an editor in the house? Oh wait...there 
> was one, back on July 31, 2007:
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Someday, Judy, *as* someone who corrects other
> > > people's writing for a living, you might figure
> > > out that a very common usage of quotation marks,
> > > in the absence of italics, is *as* italics, as
> > > a way of highlighting words and phrases.
> > 
> > Bull, and you know it. Quote marks are *not* a
> > common or even an accepted substitute for italics.
> > 
> > What you and many others use is asterisks, as you
> > just did above.
> > 
> > > Only the truly paranoid would see them as an
> > > attempt to quote *them* every time they're used. :-)

Well, now we know Barry must be thinking Share is truly
paranoid.

Actually this exchange was about a completely different
type of situation, as Barry knows. If anybody wants me
to explain further, I'll be happy to do so.


> > 
> > Nope. You've been using quote marks around your
> > own words in an attempt to imply they're someone
> > else's as long as I've known you. It's just one
> > of your many dishonest tricks.
> 
> :-)
> 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: authfriend <authfriend@>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:10 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re:to Judy & everyone -- writing for the Church of 
> > $cientology
> >  
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > My apologies to everyone including Judy for my part in
> > > this disagreement. If anyone has questions or concerns
> > > about my part in it or in the one with Robin, again my
> > > request is that you email me directly for sake of
> > > sparing the forum any further negativity.
> > 
> > "Especially the negativity of having my mistakes and
> > falsehoods called to my attention. I really hate that."
> >
>


Reply via email to