On 2 March 2012 00:43, Julian Leviston <jul...@leviston.net> wrote: > What if the aim that superseded this was to make it available to the next > set of people, who can do something about real fundamental change around > this?
Then it will probably fail: why should anyone else take up an idea that its inventors don't care to promote? > Perhaps what is needed is to ACTUALLY clear out the cruft. Maybe it's not > easy or possible through the "old" channels... too much work to convince too > many people who have so much history of the merits of tearing down the > existing systems. The old channels are all you have until you create new ones, and you're not going to get anywhere by attempting to tear down existing systems; they will be organically overrun when alternatives become more popular. But this says nothing about which alternatives become more popular. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
