Hmm this one's seemingly identical to the last one.
> vphysics.dll!260a2426()
vphysics.dll!260d3eae()
vphysics.dll!2608af8e()
vphysics.dll!2608b01b()
vphysics.dll!260a2697()
vphysics.dll!260aac2b()
vphysics.dll!2609cd5b()
server.dll!221a22cc()
vphysics.dll!2609cae9()
vphysics.dll!260967d8()
vphysics.dll!2601d878()
server.dll!22196475()
server.dll!22194661()
server.dll!221946c0()
server.dll!22156317()
server.dll!22156292()
server.dll!2213d340()
engine.dll!0da9e42f()
engine.dll!0daa0691()
engine.dll!0da9b0e7()
engine.dll!0da9cc75()
engine.dll!0da03cd7()
engine.dll!0da04376()
engine.dll!0da0f025()
engine.dll!0da0f112()
user32.dll!77d496b8()
engine.dll!0da0f1af()
engine.dll!0daacefc()
engine.dll!0daac4ed()
dedicated.dll!1000c084()
engine.dll!0daacd4e()
engine.dll!0daac48b()
dedicated.dll!1000c535()
dedicated.dll!1000c553()
materialsystem.dll!00cd0dae()
materialsystem.dll!00cd0f38()
materialsystem.dll!00cd0dae()
materialsystem.dll!00cd0f05()
materialsystem.dll!00cd7f64()
materialsystem.dll!00cd9502()
tier0.dll!0087299f()
materialsystem.dll!00cda349()
tier0.dll!008764b5()
tier0.dll!0087105a()
tier0.dll!008731d0()
tier0.dll!008738de()
datacache.dll!00e7daa2()
datacache.dll!00e7e08e()
datacache.dll!00e733ae()
datacache.dll!00e73e6b()
engine.dll!0db556b8()
engine.dll!0db552dc()
engine.dll!0d9adc0d()
dedicated.dll!10021d0b()
dedicated.dll!10022c00()
dedicated.dll!10022c00()
dedicated.dll!1000c7f7()
ntdll.dll!7c9106eb()
At 2006/03/12 02:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Well I see the vphysics crasher is alive and well after the srcds update last
>week.
>
>> vphysics.dll!260a2426()
> vphysics.dll!260d3eae()
> vphysics.dll!2608af8e()
> vphysics.dll!2608b01b()
> vphysics.dll!260a2697()
> vphysics.dll!260aac2b()
> vphysics.dll!2609cd5b()
> vphysics.dll!2609cae9()
> vphysics.dll!260967d8()
> vphysics.dll!2601d878()
> server.dll!22196475()
> server.dll!22194661()
> server.dll!221946c0()
> server.dll!22156317()
> server.dll!22156292()
> server.dll!2213d340()
> engine.dll!0da9e42f()
> engine.dll!0daa0691()
> engine.dll!0da9b0e7()
> engine.dll!0da9cc75()
> engine.dll!0da03cd7()
> engine.dll!0da04376()
> engine.dll!0da0f025()
> engine.dll!0da0f112()
> user32.dll!77d496b8()
> engine.dll!0da0f1af()
> engine.dll!0daacefc()
> engine.dll!0daac4ed()
> dedicated.dll!1000c084()
> engine.dll!0daacd4e()
> engine.dll!0daac48b()
> dedicated.dll!1000c535()
> dedicated.dll!1000c553()
> materialsystem.dll!00cd0dae()
> materialsystem.dll!00cd0f38()
> materialsystem.dll!00cd0dae()
> materialsystem.dll!00cd0f05()
> materialsystem.dll!00cd7f64()
> materialsystem.dll!00cd9502()
> tier0.dll!0087299f()
> materialsystem.dll!00cda349()
> tier0.dll!008764b5()
> tier0.dll!0087105a()
> tier0.dll!008731d0()
> tier0.dll!008738de()
> datacache.dll!00e7daa2()
> datacache.dll!00e7e08e()
> datacache.dll!00e733ae()
> datacache.dll!00e73e6b()
> engine.dll!0db556b8()
> engine.dll!0db552dc()
> engine.dll!0d9adc0d()
> dedicated.dll!10021d0b()
> dedicated.dll!10022c00()
> dedicated.dll!10022c00()
> dedicated.dll!1000c7f7()
> ntdll.dll!7c9106eb()
>
>
>At 2006/03/07 07:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Is there another resource that might be able to explain the recent vphysics
>>change in particular, or shed light on HL2's vphysics bug in general?
>>
>>At 2006/03/05 01:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>It's worth noting that whatever the change was, it primarily appears to have
>>>gotten worse on linux. Although strangely vphysics.so crashers have, if
>>>anything, gotten more rare.
>>>
>>>The behavior of the bug has not changed much on Win32 it seems. Though
>>>again may vphysics.dll crashers have gotten more rare.
>>>
>>>At 2006/03/04 12:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>Well, the mid Dec one is it then. I know I didn't update my server between
>>>>Thanksgiving and New Years, and the others server hosts I know probably
>>>>didn't either. The symptoms are the same as the same as always, but the
>>>>repro time frame seems to have changed like I said.
>>>>
>>>>Does anyone know what happened in the Dec update?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>At 2006/03/03 09:46 PM, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
>>>>>Oh, and I should add that the only vphysics change in the srcds beta is
>>>>>a save game fix for springs (initializing a member variable properly on
>>>>>construction).
>>>>>
>>>>>- Alfred
>>>>>
>>>>>Alfred Reynolds wrote:
>>>>>> There hasn't been a srcds update since mid Dec 2005. We have a beta
>>>>>> update in testing now, do you mean that one perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Alfred
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm getting reports that the latest srcds steam update has increased
>>>>>>> the amount of vphysics bugs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm fairly certain now there was a vphysics change. Does anyone know
>>>>>>> when the last one occured? It apparently has introduced more bugs in
>>>>>>> the srcds core.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My vphysics.so is dated Feb 18 22:26 but I'm not certain if that's
>>>>>>> the compile time, or the install time.
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>>>please visit:
>>>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
>>visit:
>>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>
>_______________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
>visit:
>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
