On 10/20/22 4:49 PM, Kai 'wusel' Siering via mailop wrote:
Another rule from an earlier era outlines one of the fundamental principles of the Internet Agreement: I will accept your traffic, *subject* *to* /my/ *policies* and agreements, if you will accept mine, *subject* *to* /your/ *policies* and agreements.Yes, but as t-online.de fundamentally breaks with this principle,
No they do not./Their/ /policy/, which they have published on the Internet, is /their/ prerogative.
What's more is they /are/ /accepting/ your email *subject* *to* /their/ *policies*.
Nothing states that anyone has to approve their policy or that they have to adhere to anybody else's policy.
Each and every single email administrator (or organization) is free to run their email server(s) as they choose to.
giving a 554 to *any* IP per default, they should be single cased out for good by default.
What grounds do you think that T-Online should be singled out? How are they not operating their email server subject to their policy?
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
