Edward Saul's the validity of Saul of Taurus teachings are predicated by the miracle healing of Saul by God, making him a teacher chosen by God, the problem the lies simply in the fact there are no poisonous snakes on Malta which really creates a problem with the validity of Saul's teachings especially when you have lie in the very foundation Have fun figuring that one out.. how do you erase the deciet? Allan
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:58 PM, pathfinder <[email protected]>wrote: > What lead you to think that I can type? > Lazzy? > Paul (Saul; Centurian)>...Imagine living in an environment where > certain citizens are respected as gods, in a very real sense. However, > The setting is the Age of the Sun god, Ra., Egyptian. ( Solar Cult)... > The barbarrians had not evolved from the cult before it, but they had > the basic principles. The principles had not changed, only the way > they were applied. This means that there were people that could see. > Wherefore, the story tells the way the vision was revealed and what > was revealed about Paul. The serpent had varied interpretations from > both mythologies: from representing wisdom, to the initator, the > dragon, death, so on. If one make a biological examination, then take > the results to the bigger picture of the prophecies, they will get > faster results in that understanding, I think. I love the Hebrew > language; the letters of the alphabet make statements before you can > even put them together to make a word! I see that the seer was looking > at Paul being the venom that would spread over the nations. The seer > saw it, but it's not clear whether he understood it The remark about > Paul being god could be related to the fact that he was centurian.... > Wish I knew the language! > On Nov 23, 11:18 am, pathfinder <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm looking at it. > > > > On Nov 22, 11:35 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > You are funny Edward, I wonder if you know what is in your own heart > much > > > less what is in th heart of others. As for standards there are many > > > standards, each person is their own judge. from your writings you claim > to > > > have the standards of christian dogma and doctrine which you want to > shove > > > off on everyone else. > > > Edward Edward Edward if you are dealing with anyone you need to have > your > > > reservations tailored by caution and accuracy. You will find we tend > not to > > > attack people around here but rather ideas and concepts: and all ideas > and > > > concepts are free game if you are hung up on one be warned your > feelings > > > will be hurt simple because you take things to personally. > > > > > assessment? that one is easy read your very first document that you > > > presented to this group. > > > Testimony of Jesus Christ[2]--word document.doc > > > I am to lazy to retype it. this is very typical of funnymentalist > thinking. > > > or what every you want to call them, this is according to you your > great > > > document of enlightenment. and according to them they are all on the > narrow > > > path and very few are on the path.. You do not know how many times I > have > > > been told that. What you see as narrow I see as broad and wide with > many > > > people on the path. Now as for the actual path you are on I really > don't > > > know and which is more I am really do not know,, and I do not know you > well > > > enough to make a judgment.. > > > > > When are you going to give your response to the poisonous snake biting > Saul > > > of Taurus on Malta? > > > > > Allan > > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:48 AM, pathfinder <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > The sellection of the children as an example was for what would seem, > > > > obvious reason. By age 1 the nature seem fully functional and seem to > > > > gain it's greatest outside influence around age 3. It had nothing to > > > > do with anyone's physical abilities or > > > > disabilities. > > > > > One thing that consistantly prevails in most of your messages to > > > > me , is that you come with two different standards; i.e., one for you > > > > and one for me. By those for you, you are allowed to give your > opinion > > > > freely of me and my views. The one issued for me requires that my > > > > opinion of you must be taylored by caution and > > > > accurracy > > > > >While I base my opinion of you on the contents that I see emitted > > > > from the seat of your heart. In your statement "....your generalities > > > > that you have arrived at from your teachings of christianity", show > me > > > > the ground for such an > > > > assessment. > > > > >What I prefer in socialization is that each individual maintain the > > > > self-governed standards acceptable to each. One standard should be > > > > that if I do it to you, you are justified in doing it to me. >I > > > > see the road that I'm on to be narrow and few travelers theron, for > > > > now. > > > > > > On Nov 22, 12:16 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Edward one of the absolutes of the world is if you states if > something is > > > > an > > > > > absolute you will be absolutely wrong. Don't put me in the > catagory that > > > > > you see yourself in. One thing is you do not know me or who I am > until > > > > you > > > > > do leave me out of your generalities that you have arrived at from > the > > > > > teachings of christianity. > > > > > > > As far as children go, I have been fixed and have no intention of > > > > bringing > > > > > children into this world, and for good reasons, unlike you I have > several > > > > > great grand children. Your ideas are not original but concepts that > have > > > > > been passed on for many generation. > > > > > > > You have a long way to grow in spirituality a long way that is not > easy. > > > > > According to your beliefs the road to predation is wide and many > chose > > > > to > > > > > follow it, from what I have read of your writing I would guess you > are > > > > > somewhere on that wide road. > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:25 PM, pathfinder < > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > I am saying that the heart of man aka your heart, my heart, and > the > > > > > > hearts of all are set towards survival, gratification, pleasure, > > > > > > curiousity, thrill, etc. We must learn to bring the heart into > > > > > > conformity. Out of an instinct to survive, gratify, enjoy or > whatever > > > > > > the caes may be, I, you, man, woman, we do what we think is best > for > > > > > > ourselves if we do not apply the laws or their principles. We > must > > > > > > learn to do what is wanting without violating those Laws. > > > > > > Collectively, we assume or believe that no one knows our > thoughts, > > > > > > motives, actions, so we are less likely to develope the > restraints > > > > > > upon ourselves necessary to truely be respectable towards the > rights, > > > > > > needs, concerns, etc., of our neighbor, our fellow-human-being. > As one > > > > > > experiment along these lines, recording the results, what they'll > find > > > > > > they have would be their experience. Watch the children, Allan. > At > > > > > > least two children, 1-3 years of age. One toy. Stay close and be > ready > > > > > > to teach. But you will see the heart of man there. So, unless you > came > > > > > > into this world by some other means, your's would be included > amongst > > > > > > the Heart of Man. > > > > > > > > On Nov 21, 9:12 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Interesting Edward, so you are saying your heart aka the heart > of man > > > > is > > > > > > > fully set upon doing evil ( contrary to the mystic laws)." > Please > > > > explain > > > > > > to > > > > > > > me why you are "fully set upon doing evil"? I hope you do not > give a > > > > > > bunch > > > > > > > of bible quotes but rather in your own words. > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:29 AM, pathfinder < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I see sin as a concept that has been abused, misused, but > never > > > > really > > > > > > > > understood. I see it as a violation of any of those > controlling > > > > > > > > factors which we commonly refer to as 'laws'. Some of those > we > > > > adapt > > > > > > > > to early; like those of gravity, force, the elements, etc., > because > > > > > > > > the results of the violations are immediate. Still, on a > higher > > > > level > > > > > > > > the results are more subtle, and takes more time for the > cosmos to > > > > > > > > render the prefect vibrations. Wherefore, we continue until > we get > > > > the > > > > > > > > over-load, a lot of the times. Thus, the bible verse, > 'Because the > > > > > > > > judgement of the Lord is not executed speedily, the heart of > man is > > > > > > > > fully set upon doing evil ( contrary to the mystic laws)." So > what > > > > we > > > > > > > > would finish with would be relationship and not religion. A > > > > hamonious > > > > > > > > relationship with the Laws natural to the earth/heaven > factors. > > > > Then > > > > > > > > the nations could use the soldiers on the farms, the polices > > > > building > > > > > > > > structures, the politians, well,they still might need > something > > > > that > > > > > > > > they don't have to think about. We can defy some of these > laws to a > > > > > > > > certain extent, but we can't defeat any of them. Seeming to > ignore > > > > > > > > them is not a form of defeat. If one ever learn to live in > that > > > > > > > > hormony he don't want any of those laws defeated no way. The > > > > solution, > > > > > > > > then becomes, too easy. With the magnitude of some of the > problems > > > > in > > > > > > > > this world, seems like nothing short of a major catastrophy > on a > > > > > > > > global scale could even come close to having some effect. May > be > > > > true, > > > > > > > > but, that catastrophy need be applied only to the old systems > of > > > > > > > > thoughts, produceing behavior. > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 20, 6:23 pm, ornamentalmind < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gabbers, while I may have discussed about yes/no issues, > the > > > > notion > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > sin is not one of them. I do not accept the notion of sin. > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 4:06 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you do, orn. You argue along the same yes/no line. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:46 PM, ornamentalmind < > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Accepting the notion of sin/salvation seems to be > necessary > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > current day biblical dogma to make sense. Am I missing > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > there? Oh, and I don't accept said notion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 11:54 pm, iam deheretic < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > every generation has its teachers and false teachers, > > > > prophets > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > false > > > > > > > > > > > > prophets. > > > > > > > > > > > > personally I am not into bible thumpers. > > > > > > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:24 PM, pathfinder < > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just like in the days of Noah, shall the days be > when the > > > > Son > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > Man > > > > > > > > > > > > > is revealed. Noah's message was strange and > > > > inconceivable. > > > > > > Jesus > > > > > > > > spoke > > > > > > > > > > > > > of this in Luke 17:26> "And as it was in the days > of > > > > No'e, so > > > > > > > > shall it > > > > > > > > > > > > > be also in the days of the Son of man." The warning > is > > > > also > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > numbers: 8 souls saved. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Isaiah 29:10> "For the Lord hath poured out upon > you the > > > > > > spirit > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets > and > > > > your > > > > > > > > rulers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > the seers hath he covered. > (11)- And the visioin > of all > > > > has > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > become unto you as the words of a book that is > sealed, > > > > which > > > > > > men > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > -- ( ) I_D Allan Be Paranoid. God is always building a better idiot!!!
