I'm looking at it.

On Nov 22, 11:35 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> You are funny Edward, I wonder if you know what is in your own heart much
> less what is in th heart of others.  As for standards  there are many
> standards, each person is their own judge. from your writings you claim to
> have the standards of christian dogma and doctrine which you want to shove
> off on everyone else.
> Edward Edward Edward if you are dealing with anyone you need to have your
> reservations tailored by caution and accuracy. You will find we tend not to
> attack people around here  but rather ideas and concepts: and all ideas and
> concepts are free game if you are hung up on one be warned  your feelings
> will be hurt simple because you take things to personally.
>
> assessment? that one is easy read your very first document that you
> presented to this group.
> Testimony of Jesus Christ[2]--word document.doc
> I am to lazy to retype it. this is very typical of funnymentalist thinking.
> or what every you want to call them, this is according to you your great
> document of enlightenment. and according to them they are all on the narrow
> path and very few are on the path.. You do not know how many times I have
> been told that. What you see as narrow I see as broad and wide with many
> people on the path. Now as for the actual path you are on I really don't
> know  and which is more I am really do not know,, and I do not know you well
> enough to make a judgment..
>
> When are you going to give your response to the poisonous snake biting Saul
> of Taurus on Malta?
>
> Allan
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:48 AM, pathfinder <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > The sellection of the children as an example was for what would seem,
> > obvious reason. By age 1 the nature seem fully functional and seem to
> > gain it's greatest outside influence around age 3. It had nothing to
> > do with anyone's physical abilities or
> > disabilities.
> > > One thing that consistantly prevails in most of your messages to
> > me , is that you come with two different standards; i.e., one for you
> > and one for me. By those for you, you are allowed to give your opinion
> > freely of me and my views. The one issued for me requires that my
> > opinion of you must be taylored  by caution and
> > accurracy
> > >While I base my opinion of you on the contents that I see emitted
> > from the seat of your heart. In your statement "....your generalities
> > that you have arrived at from your teachings of christianity", show me
> > the ground for such an
> > assessment.
> > >What I prefer in socialization is that each individual maintain the
> > self-governed standards acceptable to each. One standard should be
> > that if I do it to you, you are justified in doing it to me.       >I
> > see the road that I'm on to be narrow and few travelers theron, for
> > now.
>
> > On Nov 22, 12:16 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Edward one of the absolutes of the world is if you states if something is
> > an
> > > absolute  you will be absolutely wrong. Don't put me in the catagory that
> > > you see yourself in. One thing is you do not know me or who I am until
> > you
> > > do leave me out of your generalities that you have arrived at from the
> > > teachings of christianity.
>
> > > As far as children go, I have been fixed and have no intention of
> > bringing
> > > children into this world, and for good reasons, unlike you I have several
> > > great grand children. Your ideas are not original but concepts that have
> > > been passed on for many generation.
>
> > > You have a long way to grow in spirituality a long way that is not easy.
> > > According to your beliefs  the road to predation is wide and many chose
> > to
> > > follow it, from what I have read of your writing I would guess you are
> > > somewhere on that wide road.
> > > Allan
>
> > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:25 PM, pathfinder <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > I am saying that the heart of man aka your heart, my heart, and the
> > > > hearts of all are set towards survival, gratification, pleasure,
> > > > curiousity, thrill, etc. We must learn to bring the heart into
> > > > conformity. Out of an instinct to survive, gratify, enjoy or whatever
> > > > the caes may be, I, you, man, woman, we do what we think is best for
> > > > ourselves if we do not apply the laws or their principles. We must
> > > > learn to do what is wanting without violating those Laws.
> > > > Collectively, we assume or believe that no one knows our thoughts,
> > > > motives, actions, so we are less likely to develope the restraints
> > > > upon ourselves necessary to truely be respectable towards the rights,
> > > > needs, concerns, etc., of our neighbor, our fellow-human-being. As one
> > > > experiment along these lines, recording the results, what they'll find
> > > > they have would be their experience. Watch the children, Allan. At
> > > > least two children, 1-3 years of age. One toy. Stay close and be ready
> > > > to teach. But you will see the heart of man there. So, unless you came
> > > > into this world by some other means, your's would be included amongst
> > > > the Heart of Man.
>
> > > > On Nov 21, 9:12 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Interesting Edward, so you are saying your heart aka the heart of man
> > is
> > > > > fully set upon doing evil ( contrary to the mystic laws)." Please
> > explain
> > > > to
> > > > > me why you are "fully set upon doing evil"?  I hope you do not give a
> > > > bunch
> > > > > of bible quotes but rather in your own words.
> > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:29 AM, pathfinder <
> > [email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > I see sin as a concept that has been abused, misused, but never
> > really
> > > > > > understood. I see it as a violation of any of those controlling
> > > > > > factors which we commonly refer to as 'laws'. Some of those we
> > adapt
> > > > > > to early; like those of gravity, force, the elements, etc., because
> > > > > > the results of the violations are immediate. Still, on a higher
> > level
> > > > > > the results are more subtle, and takes more time for the cosmos to
> > > > > > render the prefect vibrations. Wherefore, we continue until we get
> > the
> > > > > > over-load, a lot of the times. Thus, the bible verse, 'Because the
> > > > > > judgement of the Lord is not executed speedily, the heart of man is
> > > > > > fully set upon doing evil ( contrary to the mystic laws)." So what
> > we
> > > > > > would finish with would be relationship and not religion. A
> > hamonious
> > > > > > relationship with the Laws natural to the earth/heaven factors.
> > Then
> > > > > > the nations could use the soldiers on the farms, the polices
> > building
> > > > > > structures, the politians, well,they still might need  something
> > that
> > > > > > they don't have to think about. We can defy some of these laws to a
> > > > > > certain extent, but we can't defeat any of them. Seeming to ignore
> > > > > > them is not a form of defeat. If one ever learn to live in that
> > > > > > hormony he don't want any of those laws defeated no way. The
> > solution,
> > > > > > then becomes, too easy. With the magnitude of some of the problems
> > in
> > > > > > this world, seems like nothing short of a major catastrophy on a
> > > > > > global scale could even come close to having some effect. May be
> > true,
> > > > > > but, that catastrophy need be applied only to the old systems of
> > > > > > thoughts, produceing behavior.
>
> > > > > > On Nov 20, 6:23 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > Gabbers, while I may have discussed about yes/no issues, the
> > notion
> > > > of
> > > > > > > sin is not one of them. I do not accept the notion of sin.
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 17, 4:06 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Yes, you do, orn. You argue along the same yes/no line.
>
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:46 PM, ornamentalmind <
> > > > > > [email protected]
>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Accepting the notion of sin/salvation seems to be necessary
> > for
> > > > > > > > > current day biblical dogma to make sense. Am I missing
> > something
> > > > > > > > > there? Oh, and I don't accept said notion.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 11:54 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > every generation has its teachers and false teachers,
> > prophets
> > > > and
> > > > > > false
> > > > > > > > > > prophets.
> > > > > > > > > > personally I am not into bible thumpers.
> > > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:24 PM, pathfinder <
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Just like in the days of Noah, shall the days be when the
> > Son
> > > > of
> > > > > > Man
> > > > > > > > > > > is revealed. Noah's message was strange and
> > inconceivable.
> > > > Jesus
> > > > > > spoke
> > > > > > > > > > > of this in Luke 17:26> "And as it was in the days of
> > No'e, so
> > > > > > shall it
> > > > > > > > > > > be also in the days of the Son of man." The warning is
> > also
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > numbers: 8 souls saved.
> > > > > > > > > > > Isaiah 29:10> "For the Lord hath poured out upon you the
> > > > spirit
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and
> > your
> > > > > > rulers,
> > > > > > > > > > > the seers hath he covered. > (11)- And the visioin of all
> > has
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed,
> > which
> > > > men
> > > > > > > > > > > deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray
> > > > thee:
> > > > > > and he
> > > > > > > > > > > saith, I cannot: for it is sealed:> (12)- And the book is
> > > > > > delivered to
> > > > > > > > > > > him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee:
> > and
> > > > he
> > > > > > saith,
> > > > > > > > > > > I am not learned.> (13)- Wherefore the Lord said,
> > Forasmuch
> > > > as
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > people draw near me with their mouth, and their lips do
> > > > honour
> > > > > > me, but
> > > > > > > > > > > have removed their heart far from me, and their fear
> > toward
> > > > me is
> > > > > > > > > > > taught
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to