Naw. She was just drunk and being an asshole. It was something that I got used to after a while. She was an alcoholic and a nut case. The daughter wasn't an alcoholic but otherwise took after her mom.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > I could be wrong to assume there is more to this story, but were they > perhaps getting some sun or otherwise exposed? It could've just been her > trying to play off the situation, 'Ah my dear what a lovely bosom. Don't > forget the condom!' > > > On 5/14/2011 5:12 PM, Chuck Bowling wrote: > > Maybe. But she was staring blatantly at my crotch when she said it. > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Let's hope she was referring to your personality. Maybe all the previous >> boys were too afraid to meet her? >> >> On 5/14/2011 10:33 AM, Chuck Bowling wrote: >> >> Heh. My ex's mom was probably one of the strangest creatures I've ever >> met. Her first words to me when we met was "I like your balls". Of course >> she was drunk - I think. I'd never actually seen her sober so maybe it was >> her normal state. >> >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:22 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Well...there might be agreement about where a daughter/son-in-law >>> should be placed from the mom's point of view...or jail! But I'm not >>> one of them. >>> >>> Cities also saw the rise of division of labor rather than tribes >>> traipsing about after herds, i.e. the start of commerce. >>> >>> On May 12, 5:33 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Anybody who would relocate to be near his mother-in-law is probably >>> better >>> > off in an asylum somewhere... >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:51 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > They were nomads- yes- following herds and fertile vegetation but I >>> > > think they realized the "safety in numbers' as well as organized >>> > > protection that a city would afford. In a sense, man is still nomadic >>> > > and will move for a better paying job, climate, to be near his >>> mother- >>> > > in-law, etc. :-) >>> > >>> > > On May 12, 12:01 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > I think the theory is that humans were once hunter/gatherers going >>> where >>> > > the >>> > > > food was. Once we discovered agriculture we began to settle into >>> villages >>> > > > that in turn grew. >>> > >>> > > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:03 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > Sometimes- it depends on the species (protection of the young). >>> There >>> > > > > is an urge to compete most likely based on survival that tries to >>> > > > > insure food, territory, protection from predators that varies and >>> is >>> > > > > most subtle in humans via language arts, etc. but the game's the >>> same. >>> > > > > Humans may have watched herds and decided to establish cities is >>> > > > > another thought. And yes, there are great benefits in cooperation >>> and >>> > > > > compromise but then we would have to get into a whole new arena. >>> > >>> > > > > On May 11, 8:01 pm, Chuck Bowling < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > That's true too. But, it seems that there is more cooperation >>> within >>> > > a >>> > > > > > species than across species. I wonder why that is? >>> > >>> > > > > > It seems to me like there is as much benefit in cooperation >>> between >>> > > > > species >>> > > > > > as there is within a species. >>> > >>> > > > > > I guess the answer would likely have something to do with >>> protecting >>> > > > > > offspring. >>> > >>> > > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > > > The same animals do not work together either. Check out the >>> mating >>> > > of >>> > > > > > > AK bears. Or the everlasting frustrations of male and female, >>> male >>> > > and >>> > > > > > > male, female and female, child to child human beings!!! >>> > >>> > > > > > > On May 11, 9:31 am, Chuck Bowling < >>> [email protected] >>> > >>> > > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > > Maybe the problem is a differing opinion on what 'work >>> together' >>> > > > > actually >>> > > > > > > > means. What I mean when I say that animals don't work >>> together is >>> > > > > that >>> > > > > > > there >>> > > > > > > > is no contract or agreement between them for the mutual >>> benefit >>> > > of >>> > > > > both. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > Note also that I didn't say no animals cooperate. Only that >>> most >>> > > > > don't. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > For instance; >>> > >>> > > > > > > > The shark doesn't give the sucker permission to ride along. >>> It >>> > > just >>> > > > > does >>> > > > > > > > because that is where the feeding grounds are. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > The hippo example is a symbiotic relationship because the >>> hippo >>> > > > > actually >>> > > > > > > > gives the bird permission to go into it's mouth to clean. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > Diatoms don't give the whale permission to eat them. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > Grazing deer could care less if the monkey is forewarned. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > I'm not sure it's relevant to the conversation but there is >>> a >>> > > > > difference >>> > > > > > > > between symbiotes and parasites. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:19 AM, the taoist shaman < >>> > > > > [email protected] >>> > > > > > > >wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > thats not even close to true chuck , sorry i have no real >>> > > evidence >>> > > > > but >>> > > > > > > > > nether do you , although the answer is there to be >>> researched . >>> > > ( >>> > > > > not >>> > > > > > > > > essentialy " symbiotic " .... theres too much to be said >>> , >>> > > suckers >>> > > > > > > > > feeding off bacteria on sharks , birds eating bugs off >>> > > hippopotamus >>> > > > > , >>> > > > > > > > > diatoms feeding whales , some monkey and deer do work >>> together >>> > > , >>> > > > > man >>> > > > > > > > > and dog , even recorded proof of man and orca ( shamoo ) >>> , >>> > > every >>> > > > > > > > > scavenger and paracite , ... this is all a hopeless , >>> vague , >>> > > speck >>> > > > > of >>> > > > > > > > > what i mean to convay , oh well . >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > Chuck Bowling wrote: >>> > > > > > > > > > Most species of animal don't actually cooperate in a >>> > > symbiotic >>> > > > > > > > > relationship. >>> > > > > > > > > > The monkey and deer don't work together. The monkey >>> sees the >>> > > deer >>> > > > > run >>> > > > > > > and >>> > > > > > > > > > being at about the same point in the food chain figures >>> that >>> > > it >>> > > > > > > should >>> > > > > > > > > run >>> > > > > > > > > > too. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:18 PM, the taoist shaman < >>> > > > > > > [email protected] >>> > > > > > > > > >wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > i view myself as a spiritual being haveing a human >>> > > experience >>> > > > > . >>> > > > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > > > point is that we shouldn't behave like carnivorous >>> beasts , >>> > > > > deer >>> > > > > > > and >>> > > > > > > > > > > monkeys work tgether eating nuts and beries , the >>> deer keep >>> > > a >>> > > > > look >>> > > > > > > > > > > out , monkeys pick nuts , >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > is language a good or poor indicator of intellect ? >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Ash wrote: >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Well, I think we are a part of the animal kingdom, >>> last >>> > > time >>> > > > > I >>> > > > > > > > > checked >>> > > > > > > > > > > > we were mammals in the sapien family. But I think >>> the >>> > > > > mentality >>> > > > > > > of >>> > > > > > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > > > > herd is a natural behavior to social creatures, >>> that and >>> > > our >>> > > > > > > talented >>> > > > > > > > > > > > rhetoric for negative reinforcement of behaviors >>> that go >>> > > > > against >>> > > > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > > > > norm while the norm is reinforced with confirmation >>> bias. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/5/2011 3:17 PM, the taoist shaman wrote: >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > your statments contradict each other , besides we >>> are >>> > > not >>> > > > > > > animals , >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > well....... i can be a bit of an animal from time >>> to >>> > > time >>> > > > > but >>> > > > > > > ..... >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 4, 10:02 pm, rigsy03<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> How can you expect governance unless you can >>> control >>> > > the >>> > > > > > > > > population? >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> What else is new? :-) >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Even a family needs order and control, doesn't >>> it? >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Don't you observe the order of nature? The >>> routines of >>> > > the >>> > > > > > > natural >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> world serve a definite purpose. Eat or be eaten. >>> :-) >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> On May 3, 12:50 pm, the taoist shaman< >>> > > [email protected]> >>> > > > > > > wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> are most people really sheepole ? can i get a >>> ya or >>> > > nay- >>> > > > > Hide >>> > > > > > > > > quoted >>> > > > > > > > > > > text - >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> > >
