I disagree, Andrew, and take a view more like Alan's.  Globalization
occurs when more folks operate from a world-centric life view (not ego-
centric or ethno-centric), more countries are trading goods and
services, and more folks have access to goods and services from other
countries.  This group is comprised of folks from many different parts
of the world.  A good example.

On Nov 18, 4:09 am, andrew vecsey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Globalization is reverting to the ownership and control of everything world
> wide by the few. That is the danger of it all.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, November 17, 2012 7:41:31 PM UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> > I think realistically globalization is revering to the access to
> > everything world wide
> > Allan
>
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:19 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> > wrote:
> > > But what does the term "globalization" mean? It is an abstract term.
> > > (Sort of like Alexander's "empire" at his death- to be defined by the
> > > strongest?)
>
> > > On Nov 17, 4:18 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> I agree with you Saris are very beautiful and believe me that can get
> > >> into the pricey range. Her wedding saris was well over 30,000 Euro and
> > >> her mothers was just as bad..  was never told the exact price..  but
> > >> it was out of the finest silk..
>
> > >> There are benefits to globalization ,, unfortunately those benefits
> > >> are easily destroyed by those people and companies that are extremely
> > >> selfish and uncaring...  Greedy is to soft a word for their
> > >> activities..
> > >> Allan
>
> > >> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:16 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > A great question- what is it? Maybe it is what the major powers/
> > >> > economies tell us it is. Facts betray the huge inequities among the
> > >> > nations/humanity. I would hope we don't lose some of our differences
> > >> > and adopt one style and language. Saris are my favorite to watch and
> > >> > think Indian and Asian women beat out Americans- the men aren't bad
> > >> > either. Remember when we were all so separated and the "other" seemed
> > >> > to look the same- a kind of blindness, I guess.
>
> > >> > On Nov 15, 8:47 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >> The big question is what is globalising.  In part this is stuff we
> > >> >> don't want.  We are still haunted by superstition, sexism and
> > >> >> imperialism.  I'd like to see more of our economies about building
> > >> >> safe communities and see foreign policies and our limited vision of
> > >> >> 'efficiency' as the major bars to this.  Disease is likely
> > >> >> globalising, the ability to make WMDs and take part in manufacturing
> > >> >> for war.
>
> > >> >> On 15 Nov, 23:34, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > I would substitute ignorance for indifference.
>
> > >> >> > On Nov 15, 10:00 am, Vam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > Untill nationalisn has distinctive meaning, political and
> > cultural, and
> > >> >> > > economic, free movement of people can only be a pipe dream.
>
> > >> >> > > And the "meaning," it must be remembered, is an emotional -
> > mental thing...
> > >> >> > > not merely intellectual. That's how phenomenal dimensions of any
> > thing
> > >> >> > > extends ... from indifference to emotional values, covering
> > almost
> > >> >> > > everything existential in society, politics and economics ...
> > and to
> > >> >> > > intellectual conviction, which is singularly absent in
> > everything
> > >> >> > > experiential that individuals bring into their attitudes and
> > everyday
> > >> >> > > decision-making at their present level evolution.
>
> > >> >> > > One of the most intellectual calls was issued by Marx. No one
> > could stand
> > >> >> > > up to its rigour ... not the champions and subscribers, not the
> > staus
> > >> >> > > quoist rest of the world. Capitalism stays, because it factors
> > in our
> > >> >> > > emotional drives, not because it is most just and fair to the
> > weakest in
> > >> >> > > our midst !
>
> > >> >> > > Au revoir ...
>
> > >> >> > > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:15:49 PM UTC+5:30, Lee Douglas
> > wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > > Meh!  As you know I'm all for freedom of movement, live where
> > you like, if
> > >> >> > > > much of India wish to migrate to The USA and settle in the Mid
> > West then go
> > >> >> > > > to it.  However with around only 3-5% of Earth's land mass
> > populated and
> > >> >> > > > with an increasing amount of that population living in urban
> > environments I
> > >> >> > > > daresay that India has much land of it's own in which it's
> > residents can
> > >> >> > > > settle.  Even when much of the land is gone, we are in fact
> > making strides
> > >> >> > > > for sea based habitat.
>
> > >> >> > > > Over population is a concern, much, much more for reasons of
> > food
> > >> >> > > > and energy production though than any reasons of not enough
> > land mass.
>
> > >> >> > > > On Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:15:16 UTC, Allan Heretic
> > wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > >> Okay there is large sections of farm land in the Mid west
> >  maybe we
> > >> >> > > >> can help the people of India  resettle into that area..??
> > >> >> > > >> Allan
>
> > >> >> > > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Lee Douglas <
> > [email protected]>
> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> > Umm myself I can't see globalisation as anything but a good
> > thing.  The
> > >> >> > > >> > sooner we find that our cultural differences do not matter
> > and we learn
> > >> >> > > >> to
> > >> >> > > >> > judge the individual(as opposed to the group) the better as
> > far as I'm
> > >> >> > > >> > concerned.  Ultimately it will take global working together
> > to sort out
> > >> >> > > >> the
> > >> >> > > >> > worlds ills.
>
> > >> >> > > >> > Overpopulation is a concern, but to too much of one at this
> > moment in
> > >> >> > > >> time,
> > >> >> > > >> > there are huge tracts of land still to be settled.
>
> > >> >> > > >> > On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:22:17 UTC, archytas wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> One of the Faust stories more or less predicts the
> > mechanism for the
> > >> >> > > >> >> rise of Nazi Germany including the funding.
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> On 13 Nov, 19:33, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> >> > Wetlands are very important.  The recovery work here was
> > done
> > >> >> > > >> centuries
> > >> >> > > >> >> > ago.. and here we are very eco awe.
> > >> >> > > >> >> > Allan
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> > Matrix  **  th3 beginning light
> > >> >> > > >> >> > On Nov 13, 2012 2:03 PM, "rigsy03" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > By coincidence of a former discussion, Faust was
> > draining a swamp
> > >> >> > > >> as
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > part of his spiritual rehab.//Another subject,
> > however, would be
> > >> >> > > >> the
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > wetlands and their role in the ecology.
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Nov 12, 6:11 am, Allan H <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > The Dutch are crazy a and very adept at working with
> > the sea..
> > >> >> > > >> and
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > yes
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > it cost massive  supplying its own power amounts of
> > money..  but
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > land
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > recovery is and can be very beneficial to the
> > society.  We have
> > >> >> > > >> to
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > protect our dunes to protect our country..  there is
> > very little
> > >> >> > > >> sea
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > front property unlike both the east ans west coasts
> > of the US..
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > where the coast is used mainly for private
> > residences
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > The dutch have been using green houses for years
> > long before
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Israel,,
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >  the concept of vertical greenhouses id one for
> > producing
> > >> >> > > >> produce in
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > areas where it is needed like high density cities
> > where space is
> > >> >> > > >> at
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > a
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > premium and population is at its maximum..  trying
> > to bring down
> > >> >> > > >> the
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > cost of food..  and it is based on hydroponics and
> > objectively
> > >> >> > > >> to be
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > self sufficient power wise..  the idea is not
> > particularly cheap
> > >> >> > > >> but
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > as for the benefit of society is extremely valuable.
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Some ideas need to be looked at in relationship to
> > self.
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Allan
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 AM, rigsy03 <
> > [email protected]>
> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > Israel has been very successful with greenhouse
> > agriculture. A
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > nearby
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > restaurant contracted with local homeowners to
> > grow some fresh
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > produce
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > which might catch on. I consider the labor and
> > high water
> > >> >> > > >> usage a
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > negative, however.
>
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > On Nov 11, 5:23 am, Allan H <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> I don't think that will work,,  I think your
> > solution would
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> result in
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> wide spread famine world wide  though the
> > chemical farmers
> > >> >> > > >> are
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> not the
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> best solution  they are not the worst either
> >  from
> > >> >> > > >> supermarkets
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> to
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> farmers markets would again result in wide spread
> > hunger and
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> famine..
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> corporations have the ability to preserve food
> > and spread it
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> trough
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> out the world where it is needed..  one of the
> > problems is
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> distribution  .. and production..  at one time I
> > owned
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> approximately
> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> 200 hectors of
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 



Reply via email to