With drugs and mass media they control our desires and with drugs and 
schools they control our thinking. The only simple solution I can think of 
is not to play their game. Just refuse to buy what they offer to sell.  .  

On Sunday, November 18, 2012 9:47:11 PM UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> globalization can be very beneficial and granted there are many self 
> centered individuals and corporations that have that have little 
> concern for others or our world..  but one thing that is coming out of 
> it they can not control what people thing and desire their world to 
> be..  Little by little I see people reclaiming the dreams of a better 
> world. 
> Oh well what can you expect from an old hippie 
> Allan 
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:43 PM, archytas <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > Andrew is obviously right when one considers where our wealth is 
> > ending-up.  This group is broadly parochial, white and barely 
> > understands what it excludes and how.  We are reliant on centralised 
> > technology that is soon to force us to a format we don't want. 
> > Rigsy's question is about right.  Previous globalisation was 
> > colonising and I suspect most of what we are witnessing now is in that 
> > model.  It would be good to make the move in emphasis Molly suggests, 
> > but the signs in the underlying business model indicate the opposite 
> > to me - currently remaining in advertising and making a killing in 
> > market share.  There is another (dated) form of globalisation in the 
> > phrase 'workers of the world unite' and it must be clear this has been 
> > resisted by the powerful other than in their own 'guilds'.  My list on 
> > what globalisation is would be long and rather vague - including 
> > teaching foreign students with bare English textbook answers I kn ow 
> > to be rot.  James Bond has globalised but not decent water, food and 
> > housing for all - let alone freedom from the kind of idiots on all 
> > sides who keep such stuff as the Arab-Israeli conflict going. 
> > 
> > We need realistic optimism - but this means embracing really bad news 
> > on climate (worse than we think) and history (much worse than we 
> > think) in order to see how we get some decent stuff done amongst the 
> > enemies of open society.  Globalisation is getting very real in the 
> > sense of telepresence (I could be operated on in Bolton by a surgeon 
> > in Madras) and other varieties of the embodiment of knowledge that 
> > will allow remote and even home manufacturing. 
> > 
> > Postmodernism (which I regard as the move to modernism we have never 
> > had) is bringing about a legitimation crisis.  I am broadly (but not 
> > completely) free of the religious dross taught in youth and chronic 
> > copy-teachers who told me Julius Caesar invaded Britain in 53AD and 
> > that humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes like other apes.  To discover 
> > the extent of ideological dross in my education I travelled.  The 
> > Internet's supposedly global reach does  not even compare.  How could 
> > anything be more parochial that Faceflop and Twatter?  What would be 
> > want to globalise - does anyone ever ask us?  How about freedom from 
> > work as means of income? 
> > 
> > On 18 Nov, 14:11, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> I disagree, Andrew, and take a view more like Alan's.  Globalization 
> >> occurs when more folks operate from a world-centric life view (not ego- 
> >> centric or ethno-centric), more countries are trading goods and 
> >> services, and more folks have access to goods and services from other 
> >> countries.  This group is comprised of folks from many different parts 
> >> of the world.  A good example. 
> >> 
> >> On Nov 18, 4:09 am, andrew vecsey <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > Globalization is reverting to the ownership and control of everything 
> world 
> >> > wide by the few. That is the danger of it all. 
> >> 
> >> > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 7:41:31 PM UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > > I think realistically globalization is revering to the access to 
> >> > > everything world wide 
> >> > > Allan 
> >> 
> >> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:19 PM, rigsy03 
> >> > > <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
> >> > > wrote: 
> >> > > > But what does the term "globalization" mean? It is an abstract 
> term. 
> >> > > > (Sort of like Alexander's "empire" at his death- to be defined by 
> the 
> >> > > > strongest?) 
> >> 
> >> > > > On Nov 17, 4:18 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> > > >> I agree with you Saris are very beautiful and believe me that 
> can get 
> >> > > >> into the pricey range. Her wedding saris was well over 30,000 
> Euro and 
> >> > > >> her mothers was just as bad..  was never told the exact price.. 
>  but 
> >> > > >> it was out of the finest silk.. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> There are benefits to globalization ,, unfortunately those 
> benefits 
> >> > > >> are easily destroyed by those people and companies that are 
> extremely 
> >> > > >> selfish and uncaring...  Greedy is to soft a word for their 
> >> > > >> activities.. 
> >> > > >> Allan 
> >> 
> >> > > >> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:16 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> 
> wrote: 
> >> > > >> > A great question- what is it? Maybe it is what the major 
> powers/ 
> >> > > >> > economies tell us it is. Facts betray the huge inequities 
> among the 
> >> > > >> > nations/humanity. I would hope we don't lose some of our 
> differences 
> >> > > >> > and adopt one style and language. Saris are my favorite to 
> watch and 
> >> > > >> > think Indian and Asian women beat out Americans- the men 
> aren't bad 
> >> > > >> > either. Remember when we were all so separated and the "other" 
> seemed 
> >> > > >> > to look the same- a kind of blindness, I guess. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> > On Nov 15, 8:47 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> > > >> >> The big question is what is globalising.  In part this is 
> stuff we 
> >> > > >> >> don't want.  We are still haunted by superstition, sexism and 
> >> > > >> >> imperialism.  I'd like to see more of our economies about 
> building 
> >> > > >> >> safe communities and see foreign policies and our limited 
> vision of 
> >> > > >> >> 'efficiency' as the major bars to this.  Disease is likely 
> >> > > >> >> globalising, the ability to make WMDs and take part in 
> manufacturing 
> >> > > >> >> for war. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> On 15 Nov, 23:34, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > I would substitute ignorance for indifference. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > On Nov 15, 10:00 am, Vam <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > Untill nationalisn has distinctive meaning, political and 
> >> > > cultural, and 
> >> > > >> >> > > economic, free movement of people can only be a pipe 
> dream. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > And the "meaning," it must be remembered, is an emotional 
> - 
> >> > > mental thing... 
> >> > > >> >> > > not merely intellectual. That's how phenomenal dimensions 
> of any 
> >> > > thing 
> >> > > >> >> > > extends ... from indifference to emotional values, 
> covering 
> >> > > almost 
> >> > > >> >> > > everything existential in society, politics and economics 
> ... 
> >> > > and to 
> >> > > >> >> > > intellectual conviction, which is singularly absent in 
> >> > > everything 
> >> > > >> >> > > experiential that individuals bring into their attitudes 
> and 
> >> > > everyday 
> >> > > >> >> > > decision-making at their present level evolution. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > One of the most intellectual calls was issued by Marx. No 
> one 
> >> > > could stand 
> >> > > >> >> > > up to its rigour ... not the champions and subscribers, 
> not the 
> >> > > staus 
> >> > > >> >> > > quoist rest of the world. Capitalism stays, because it 
> factors 
> >> > > in our 
> >> > > >> >> > > emotional drives, not because it is most just and fair to 
> the 
> >> > > weakest in 
> >> > > >> >> > > our midst ! 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > Au revoir ... 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:15:49 PM UTC+5:30, Lee 
> Douglas 
> >> > > wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > > Meh!  As you know I'm all for freedom of movement, live 
> where 
> >> > > you like, if 
> >> > > >> >> > > > much of India wish to migrate to The USA and settle in 
> the Mid 
> >> > > West then go 
> >> > > >> >> > > > to it.  However with around only 3-5% of Earth's land 
> mass 
> >> > > populated and 
> >> > > >> >> > > > with an increasing amount of that population living in 
> urban 
> >> > > environments I 
> >> > > >> >> > > > daresay that India has much land of it's own in which 
> it's 
> >> > > residents can 
> >> > > >> >> > > > settle.  Even when much of the land is gone, we are in 
> fact 
> >> > > making strides 
> >> > > >> >> > > > for sea based habitat. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > > Over population is a concern, much, much more for 
> reasons of 
> >> > > food 
> >> > > >> >> > > > and energy production though than any reasons of not 
> enough 
> >> > > land mass. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > > On Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:15:16 UTC, Allan 
> Heretic 
> >> > > wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> Okay there is large sections of farm land in the Mid 
> west 
> >> > >  maybe we 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> can help the people of India  resettle into that 
> area..?? 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> Allan 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Lee Douglas < 
> >> > > [email protected]> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> wrote: 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Umm myself I can't see globalisation as anything but 
> a good 
> >> > > thing.  The 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > sooner we find that our cultural differences do not 
> matter 
> >> > > and we learn 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> to 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > judge the individual(as opposed to the group) the 
> better as 
> >> > > far as I'm 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > concerned.  Ultimately it will take global working 
> together 
> >> > > to sort out 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> the 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > worlds ills. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Overpopulation is a concern, but to too much of one 
> at this 
> >> > > moment in 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> time, 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > there are huge tracts of land still to be settled. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:22:17 UTC, archytas 
> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> One of the Faust stories more or less predicts the 
> >> > > mechanism for the 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> rise of Nazi Germany including the funding. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On 13 Nov, 19:33, Allan H <[email protected]> 
> wrote: 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Wetlands are very important.  The recovery work 
> here was 
> >> > > done 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> centuries 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > ago.. and here we are very eco awe. 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Allan 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Matrix  **  th3 beginning light 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Nov 13, 2012 2:03 PM, "rigsy03" <
> [email protected]> 
> >> > > wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > By coincidence of a former discussion, Faust 
> was 
> >> > > draining a swamp 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> as 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > part of his spiritual rehab.//Another subject, 
> >> > > however, would be 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> the 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > wetlands and their role in the ecology. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Nov 12, 6:11 am, Allan H <
> [email protected]> 
> >> > > wrote: 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > The Dutch are crazy a and very adept at 
> working with 
> >> > > the sea.. 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> and 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > yes 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > it cost massive  supplying its own power 
> amounts of 
> >> > > money..  but 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > land 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > recovery is and can be very beneficial to the 
> >> > > society.  We have 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> to 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > protect our dunes to protect our country.. 
>  there is 
> >> > > very little 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> sea 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > front property unlike both the east ans west 
> coasts 
> >> > > of the US.. 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > where the coast is used mainly for private 
> >> > > residences 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > The dutch have been using green houses for 
> years 
> >> > > long before 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Israel,, 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >  the concept of vertical greenhouses id one 
> for 
> >> > > producing 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> produce in 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > areas where it is needed like high density 
> cities 
> >> > > where space is 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> at 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > a 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > premium and population is at its maximum.. 
>  trying 
> >> > > to bring down 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> the 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > cost of food..  and it is based on 
> hydroponics and 
> >> > > objectively 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> to be 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > self sufficient power wise..  the idea is not 
> >> > > particularly cheap 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> but 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > as for the benefit of society is extremely 
> valuable. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Some ideas need to be looked at in 
> relationship to 
> >> > > self. 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Allan 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 AM, rigsy03 < 
> >> > > [email protected]> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> wrote: 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > Israel has been very successful with 
> greenhouse 
> >> > > agriculture. A 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > nearby 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > restaurant contracted with local homeowners 
> to 
> >> > > grow some fresh 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > produce 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > which might catch on. I consider the labor 
> and 
> >> > > high water 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> usage a 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > negative, however. 
> >> 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > On Nov 11, 5:23 am, Allan H <
> [email protected]> 
> >> > > wrote: 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> I don't think that will work,,  I think 
> your 
> >> > > solution would 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> result in 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> wide spread famine world wide  though the 
> >> > > chemical farmers 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> are 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> not the 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> best solution  they are not the worst 
> either 
> >> > >  from 
> >> > > >> >> > > >> supermarkets 
> >> 
> >> ... 
> >> 
> >> read more ยป 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>
>
>
> -- 
>  ( 
>   ) 
> |_D Allan 
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. 
>
>
> I am a Natural Airgunner - 
>
>  Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. 
>

-- 



Reply via email to