Hi Bo, > Dan had written: >>>> As you know, I don't subscribe to your theory that the MOQ is a >>>> "meta-level." The MOQ is Robert Pirsig's idea and as such is a >>>> collection of intellectual patterns of value. > > Peter: >> I think 'meta-level' is appropriate because openness to the >> dynamic is >> like seeing the whole context (the actual levels) by stepping beyond >> the limits of the 4th level, the limitations of SOM. Besides MoQ is >> metaphysics! > Bo: > Right, the MOQ is a metaphysics, exactly what I have struggled > to express. Besides the 4th. level is static and can't contain the > very DQ/SQ system...
Steve: The intellectual level doesn't hope to contain "the very DQ/sq system." DQ is obviously not contained in a static level. The 4th level contains descriptions of DQ. The MOQ isn't reality itself, it is words about reality. You are confusing the menu and the food. Regards, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
