Hi Ron, >Ron: >It's not really about the MoQ as a concept so much as the state of >awareness It evokes. To lump it in with static intellectual patterns doesn't seem >to work. It doesn't leave any room to experience quality.
Steve: I think you make a wrong turn thinking of the MOQ as a state of awareness. Pirsig does not try to name levels of consciousness, he names types of patterns of value. What you are looking fo you might find in Ken Wilbur's work: http://www.kheper.net/topics/Wilber/levels.html Ron: Steve, thanks for the link, I'm not thinking of MoQ as a state of awareness Verbatim, what I'm alluding to is a state of awareness evoked by MoQ, but that's neither Here nor there seeing how my point is not understood. But I appreciate the effort. It was an honor discussing this issue with someone of your caliber. Many thanks. You helped me a great deal. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
