>      SA:  Do you know what dynamic quality is?  It
> is everyday experience.  Do you know what everyday
> experience is?  Your livin' it.  Do you know how to
> communicate this experience?  Well, you could try to
> break this experience down into one or more of the
> levels.  Is this communicated experience the same as
> the living experience?  No, so static quality is the
> communicated experience of the lived experienced
> which the latter is dynamic quality.  I don't see
what the
> problem is here.  This is basic stuff. 

 
> Ron:
> "You may think everything you say and everything you
> think is just you
> but actually the language you use and the values you
> have are the result
> of thousands of years of cultural evolution. It's
> all in a kind of
> debris of pieces that seem unrelated but are
> actually part of a huge
> fabric." (LILA)
> "What enters the eye is not really seen until it is
> organized by the brain
> To see what is the case requires context, inference,
> concepts,
> experience, interpretation."
> "There is no innocent eye" Nietzsche called this
> "the fallacy of the
> immaculate perception" in 
> order for you to perceive something, you must add to
> your sense datum
> you must furnish an element of projection."


 
> Ron:
> Distinguishing the difference SA, is not such an
> easy affair for me.


SA:
     I don't see anything that you mentioned here,
different from what I said above.  Where are you
having such difficulty?  What difference are you
trying to distinguish?


SA


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to