> [Platt]
> All European nations are, for the most part, socialist, i.e. Marxist "From
> each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs." The
> Democrat party in the U.S. subscribes to those principles and now holds
> power in Congress. Multiculturism now being taught in government schools
> equates tribal societies with the free market capitalism. The Democrat party
> in the U.S. subscribes to those principles and now holds power in Congress.
> 
> [Krimel]
> I do not believe there is a single country in the EU that has nationalized
> industries. It was tried for a time in the UK but they gave it up. But we
> have plenty of Europeans here who can speak to this better than I.
> 
> But no political candidate in this country for at least the past 50 years
> has called for nationalization of any industry.

You have a narrow definition of socialism. Basically, socialism is a system 
that forces one person to care for another. The key word -- forces. 
 
> [Platt]
> Multiculturism now being taught in government schools equates tribal
> societies with the free market capitalism.
> 
> [Krimel]
> Name a school. Cite a textbook where this is done. Put up or shut up.

Are you saying multiculturism isn't being taught in government schools?

> [Platt]
> I assume you also discriminate between good and evil. You seemed
> to suggest that discrimination was bad.  
> 
> [Krimel]
> I and many of my fellow Americans think that racial discrimination it bad.
> Do you?

Absolutely. I assume you agree and are against Affirmative Action.

> > [Krimel]
> > It might mean that everyone gets and equal shot at a piece of the pie but
> > how it that bad?
> 
> [Platt]
> That's not bad. But, as taught it usually means redistribution of income,
> whether earned or not.
> 
> [Krimel]
> Then it should be easy to find it in a school textbook. Please cite one.

Are you suggesting that government schools aren't teaching that government 
programs to "help" the poor are good?. 

> [Platt]
> Multiculturism. All cultures are equal. 
> 
> [Krimel]
> Says who besides you?

Are you suggesting multiculturism doesn't teach equality of cultures?

> > [Platt]
> > Hillary, Obama -- take over the oil companies. 
> > 
> > [Krimel]
> > I must have missed that. Was this in a debate? Which oil companies have
> > either of them proposed nationalizing?
> 
> [Platt]
> All of them. They have proposed taking away their profits which is 
> tantamount to nationalization. 
> 
> [Krimel]
> So then it should be easy enough for you to tell me what they said and when.
> Please do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1PfE9K8j0g

> > [Krimel]
> > Odd, I have never really looked at that but this chart suggests that
> > before the late 1950s almost 60% of blacks in this country lived below
> > that arbitrary line now it's about 20%. Care to comment on the success or
> > failure of the war on poverty and "entitlement" programs? 
> > 
> > http://www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/socy441/trends/povrace.html
> 
> [Platt]
> Check the chart at:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States
> 
> [Krimel]
> Ok my chart tells me that the War on Poverty was wildly successful in
> reducing poverty among our poorest and most politically disadvantaged
> citizens and yours shows that it reduced poverty overall by more than 50%.
> 
> What's the problem?

My chart shows there has been no reduction in the poverty rate since 1970.
What's the problem? 

> > [Krimel]
> > What Pirsig extols is Indian Values. It is obvious to anyone who looks at
> > American history that the fate of the Indian lifestyle was doomed in 1492.
> > European invaders and the US government engaged it despicable, treacherous
> > and deceitful practices that made sure of that. Capturing tribal leaders
> > under flags of truce, violating treaties, extortion, genocide, slaughter
> > of the buffalo; it is a sorry story but not one you seem the least
> > remorseful about. It is much worse than the government sanctioned
> > treatment of slaves who, as property, at least had Value worth preserving.
> 
> [Platt]
> How can I be remorseful? I wasn't there. 
> 
> [Krimel]
> You do not have to be remorseful to acknowledge that your government
> committed atrocities. Do you acknowledge that what was done was wrong?

Sure. Do you acknowledge the benefits of modern civilization?   

> > [Krimel]
> > Isn't this the kind of evil you think worth discriminating against? 
> > Wouldn't you agree that there are lessons in this history that should be
> > taught to our children?
> 
> [Platt]
> Absolutely -- as well as the evils of collectivism as practiced in 
> 
> [Krimel]
> So you agree that the Native American genocide and slavery should be taught
> to children in the same context as the evils perpetrated in Germany, Italy,
> China, Cuba, North Korea and Russia in the 20th century and continuing to
> this day? 

Sure, but emphasizing the different context, especially the time frame. 



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to