dmb and Andre,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:
> The point dmb and Pirsig are making is the moral goodness of intellectual
> patterns dominating social and biological patterns. In other words it is good
> for social and biological patterns to be subordinate to intellectual
> patterns. Currently some intellectual patterns are subordinated to serve
> social (financial) interests. This seems to be an accepted moral code (which
> you defend)in the same way what held the Victorian pattern together.
Here is another point RMP has presented:
"While sustaining biological and social patterns
Kill all intellectual patterns.
Kill them completely
And then follow Dynamic Quality
And morality will be served."
(LILA, Chapter 32)
Marsha:
How it that that morality will be served??? It seems Andre's presentation of
RMP's point does not necessarily match with what he writes in Chapter 32. I
am glad you cleared up your point. I don't always find things as obviously
black or white as you do.
Marsha
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
