Christopher Jahn wrote:

> And it came to pass that Peter Lairo wrote:
> 
> 
>>Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>
>>
>>>And it came to pass that Niko Pavlicek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Peter Lairo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>[..]
>>>>>You couldn't be more wrong. For some reason you don't
>>>>>understand that "marked-as-deleted" messages ARE visible
>>>>>in the INBOX!!! 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>after reading this message, I must *really* be *totally*
>>>>wrong! 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>No, you're not.  Peter is mistaken. 
>>>OR he is speaking of behavior which is platform dependant,
>>>and it's not a platform either of us are using.
>>>
>>>In Windows, "deleting" the message removes it from view in
>>>the Inbox immediately.  And tehy remain unseen until they
>>>are deleted or restored to the file.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>NO, it may just be a simple misunderstanding. I am talking
>>about *IMAP* server mail and you seem to be talking about
>>POP3 server mail. 
>>
>>
> 
> There you go - we're comparing apples and oranges.
> 
> 
>>The option "mark as deleted" does not exist for POP servers.
>>For imap servers, it is under Edite - Mail/News Account
>>Settings - Server Settings - When I delete a message: "Mark
>>it as deleted". 
>>
>>So now you see, we are both right, BUT you had no business
>>giving an opinion on something you didn't understand (you
>>never even knew what the "mark as deleted" setting is).
>>
>>
> 
> As I have not had occasion to USE IMAP, you are correct - I 
> would not know the settings; they do not appear with POP3 
> accounts.  After all, POP3 is different than IMAP.
> 
> And after all, this *is* a discussion about POP3 servers.  
> 
> Which DO NOT have a "mark as deleted" option.
> 
> With no "mark as deleted' option, there are no "red exclamation 
> points"
> 
> With no "Mark as Read" option, the messages are NOT visible in 
> the Inbox.
> 
> So Peter, YOU are the one who has "no business giving an 
> opinion", as you could not even understand that we were not 
> discussing IMAP servers and their attendant functions.
> 
> Unless you can show some relevance in emphasizing IMAP functions 
> in a POP3 discussion?
> 
> 


I can point to SEVERAL locations (~10) in this thread that refer to 
"marked as deleted" which is an IMAP-only issue. Can you point to nearly 
as many messages where "POP" is mentioned (i counted about 3)? I don't 
think so.

Therefore, the interpretation of this thread as a "mark as deleted" 
(imap) discussion is far more logical than that of a pop-only 
discussion, which has zero relevance to "mark-as-deleted". So there ;)

Actually, all chest-pounding aside, I think it just wasn't clear during 
the whole discussion what exactly the issue/problem was. Everyone 
assumed that it was what THEY were talking about (including me). The 
discussion evolved and became clearer as it went along. Now the issue 
remains (for me): *Please don't delete messages in my IMAP inbox that 
are marked for deletion when i empty my trash*.

-- 

Regards,

Peter Lairo


Reply via email to