Waldemar,
you are seeing the exact same effect that I do when I use mechanical
layers 5 - 16. The above mentioned mechanical layers only seem to display
reliably or properly when they are the current layer.
It seems to be a bug or coding deficiency with the program that
effects the new mechanical layers which were added to P99SE. I have not
found, nor heard of any work around. I hope that it is on somebody's buglist
and will be fixed in subsequent service packs.
Anybody else ever find a work around or a fix for this issue?
Brad Velander,
Lead PCB Designer,
Norsat International Inc.,
#300 - 4401 Still Creek Dr.,
Burnaby, B.C., V5C 6G9.
Tel. (604) 292-9089 direct
Fax (604) 292-9010
website www.norsat.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Waldemar Kulajew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:49 AM
> To: ProtelForum
> Subject: [PEDA] Mechanikal Layers are disappearing
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am using Mechanical Layers 5 +6 first time and run
> into an famous effect: my
> tracks an these layers disappear! Every time I set an other
> layer aktiv (i.e
> TopLayer) and caus an redraw (i.e. by panning or hit [V]+[R]
> keys) I cant see my
> lines any more. When I set the Llayer activ again (by clicking the TAB
> Mechanical5 ) there they are. Using the Mechlayers 1-4 will
> not show these
> Problem. I am running 99SE SP6 under WIN98.
> I wunder if anybody else has seen these Problem and/or
> if anybodyknow a
> workaround. I just wanted to sign areas for diferent component hights.
>
>
> Any comments are appreciated.
>
> thanks in addvance, Waldemar
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
