Joop,
        as I have stated, I experience the same problem as Waldemar. In my
case this issue has been consistent across two machines I've had and several
other company machines. The machines are usually similar but have had
several different video cards/drivers.
        In both of my machines the video cards were 32MB cards, the present
card is (as far as I can determine without opening the box):
An Asus Nvidia (NV5) clone with 32MB RAM. I run it at 1280 x 1024, 72 Hertz,
True color and small fonts. 
        I am running NT4 with P99SE SP6 and that would be the common OS
across all the systems we have run until just very recently. We are changing
to W2K and I should have a W2K machine within the week. At least one system
which is already W2K is acting in exactly the same manner, as I might have
expected from our experiences thus far.

Brad Velander,
Lead PCB Designer,
Norsat International Inc.,
#300 - 4401 Still Creek Dr.,
Burnaby, B.C., V5C 6G9.
Tel. (604) 292-9089 direct
Fax (604) 292-9010
website www.norsat.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joop Reekers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:57 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Mechanikal Layers are disappearing
> 
> I often use Mech Layers 5-16 and I do NOT see the described effect.
> I'm using P99SE+SP6, WIN2K on AMD K6-2-350 with only 128MB RAM and an
> Intel740 PCI video card.
> Could it be caused by (lack of) memory or by your video card 
> or its driver,
> or may be by the color settings (I use High Color (16 bit))?
> 
> Have a nice day!
> 
> Joop Reekers
> Semecs bv, Almelo NL

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to