Or incontinence.

Sorry.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Gmitrovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 23 June 2003 09:03
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] OrCad to Protel
> 
> 
> Another corollary is "The grass is brown wherever you go". It 
> might not be the colour of grass, it might just be a vision problem.
> 
> Igor
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 20 June 2003 11:13 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] OrCad to Protel
> 
> 
> You all know the expression "The grass is always greener on 
> the other side
> of the fence".
> 
> The corillary to that is "The grass is always browner where you are
> standing".
> 
> Best regards,
> Ivan Baggett
> Bagotronix Inc.
> website:  www.bagotronix.com
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] OrCad to Protel
> 
> 
> >
> > Strange this, I am going in exactly the opposite direction. 
> I used Orcad
> > for 8 yrs until my present job introduced me to Protel. I 
> am crowing with
> > delight now that the firm has cut a deal with Cadence. 
> Protel has got the
> > "look and feel" right and Orcad is undeniably clunky but I 
> still can't
> > believe that any professional app could be as unreliable as Protel.
> > Crashes frequently and thoroughly,  can't do hierarchy 
> properly, can't
> > screen single pin nets ( very embarrasing ), leaves routes hanging
> > unconnected without warning, cannot reconnect a netlist to routes
> > competently. The SI tools are very fragile and do strange 
> things without
> > warning, there is no documentation to properly describe the 
> workings of
> the
> > SI tools... (ie the calculation engine(s)). I have no idea 
> without doing
> > experimental work as to how much of the SI output is true ( again,
> > embarrasing ). It was as though the authors got so far and 
> then gave up.
> > They did all the up front look and feel stuff but forgot the really
> > important hard edges.
> > No way has my experience with Protel given me the slightest 
> desire to try
> > DXP. I am on my last Protel project now and it is Orcad and 
> Specctra from
> > now on... yippee!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                       Website Visitor
> >                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
> proteledaforum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >                       ervinc.com>                  cc:
> >                                                    Subject: 
>  [PEDA] OrCad
> to Protel
> >                       19-Jun-2003 03:17 PM
> >                       Please respond to
> >                       "Protel EDA Forum"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all, I used to use Protel 99SE about 3 years ago. Then with a new
> > job, the company has Orcad. I've been using Orcad now for 
> the 3 years
> > and I am absolutely disgusted with it. I'm trying to convince
> > management to go to Protel. All I wanted to know is how everyone
> > feels about the new Protel DXP. I really want to switch back to
> > Protel and any info would be great! Thanks for the replies
> >
> > Evi
> >
> > Posted from Association web site by: Evi Tomaskovic
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to