Or incontinence. Sorry.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Gmitrovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 23 June 2003 09:03 > To: Protel EDA Forum > Subject: Re: [PEDA] OrCad to Protel > > > Another corollary is "The grass is brown wherever you go". It > might not be the colour of grass, it might just be a vision problem. > > Igor > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 20 June 2003 11:13 PM > To: Protel EDA Forum > Subject: Re: [PEDA] OrCad to Protel > > > You all know the expression "The grass is always greener on > the other side > of the fence". > > The corillary to that is "The grass is always browner where you are > standing". > > Best regards, > Ivan Baggett > Bagotronix Inc. > website: www.bagotronix.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:40 AM > Subject: Re: [PEDA] OrCad to Protel > > > > > > Strange this, I am going in exactly the opposite direction. > I used Orcad > > for 8 yrs until my present job introduced me to Protel. I > am crowing with > > delight now that the firm has cut a deal with Cadence. > Protel has got the > > "look and feel" right and Orcad is undeniably clunky but I > still can't > > believe that any professional app could be as unreliable as Protel. > > Crashes frequently and thoroughly, can't do hierarchy > properly, can't > > screen single pin nets ( very embarrasing ), leaves routes hanging > > unconnected without warning, cannot reconnect a netlist to routes > > competently. The SI tools are very fragile and do strange > things without > > warning, there is no documentation to properly describe the > workings of > the > > SI tools... (ie the calculation engine(s)). I have no idea > without doing > > experimental work as to how much of the SI output is true ( again, > > embarrasing ). It was as though the authors got so far and > then gave up. > > They did all the up front look and feel stuff but forgot the really > > important hard edges. > > No way has my experience with Protel given me the slightest > desire to try > > DXP. I am on my last Protel project now and it is Orcad and > Specctra from > > now on... yippee!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Website Visitor > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: > proteledaforum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ervinc.com> cc: > > Subject: > [PEDA] OrCad > to Protel > > 19-Jun-2003 03:17 PM > > Please respond to > > "Protel EDA Forum" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, I used to use Protel 99SE about 3 years ago. Then with a new > > job, the company has Orcad. I've been using Orcad now for > the 3 years > > and I am absolutely disgusted with it. I'm trying to convince > > management to go to Protel. All I wanted to know is how everyone > > feels about the new Protel DXP. I really want to switch back to > > Protel and any info would be great! Thanks for the replies > > > > Evi > > > > Posted from Association web site by: Evi Tomaskovic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
