DXF would be good for me as well. I never expect things to be perfectly
ideal, just when I need to move quickly, I don't have time to reinvent the
wheel, even though I'm perfectly aware and embracing of the standard
Protel-User's methodology concerning footprints and schematic sysmbols, ie,
DIY...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leo Potjewijd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
> 
> Well, I've got 2 (euro)cents to spare:
> 
> I'd settle for footprint definitions in DXF, preferably also 
> showing the 
> paste mask  and component outline.
> 
> That would already make a huge difference in work when 
> defining a library 
> component, with virtually no extra effort on the manufacturer 
> side. 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to