DXF would be good for me as well. I never expect things to be perfectly ideal, just when I need to move quickly, I don't have time to reinvent the wheel, even though I'm perfectly aware and embracing of the standard Protel-User's methodology concerning footprints and schematic sysmbols, ie, DIY...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Potjewijd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Well, I've got 2 (euro)cents to spare: > > I'd settle for footprint definitions in DXF, preferably also > showing the > paste mask and component outline. > > That would already make a huge difference in work when > defining a library > component, with virtually no extra effort on the manufacturer > side. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
