188 hits
= 143 Singles
    27 doubles
    10 Triples
     8 HRs

Add 70SBs - 12CS and you have the equivalent of
    61 Singles
    75 Doubles
    10 Triples
      8 HRs

I
On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Ray Salemi wrote:

> How did you do that transformation?
> 
> On 12/18/09, Charles Battikha <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Another stat for Jacoby....
>> 
>> If you take into account 70 steals/12 caught stealing, you have
>> 
>> BA:    285
>> OB:    334
>> SLG:  468
>> OBS:  802
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Ray Salemi wrote:
>> 
>>> It's actually worse than Power/Speed.  It's hitting speed.
>>> 
>>> here are the BA/OBA/SLG/OPS numbers for both from last year.
>>> 
>>> Ellsbury:
>>> 
>>> .301        .355    .415    .770    
>>> 
>>> Gonzalez:
>>> .277        .407    .551    .958
>>> 
>>> No contest.
>>> 
>>> Gonzalez gets on base more often and hit's the ball further.
>>> 
>>> Ray
>>> 
>>> PS.  This is a great example of the limitations of batting average.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Matt & Olga McSorley
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> We've devolved into the scout/stat argument again. Here is the real issue
>>> in making the decision to trade Ellsbury for Adrian Gonzalez:
>>> 
>>> Power>Speed.
>>> 
>>> -- Matt
>>> 
>>> From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Fri, December 18, 2009 11:46:29 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Dealing Ellsbury?
>>> 
>>> I am ashamed.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Chain of Command was a Star Trek: The Next Generation episode.....c'mon
>>> people.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> "Stat's are valuable"  First time I've ever heard you utter that phrase on
>>> this list.
>>> 
>>> And who doesn't want to hear about Deep Space Nine?  (That was an obscure
>>> reference. Good job!)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Beaudoin, John
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> If you’re going to use my name, then please don’t speak for me and say
>>> that I dismiss stats completely.  I fully admit they are valuable and my
>>> point, yet again, is that some people look only at the stats.  Why can’t
>>> someone say that they like the way a guy plays.  Based on Pedroia’s
>>> statiscal body size and weight, he shouldn’t have been given a chance.
>>> Thank God there are scouts who see beyond stats. Or will you argue that
>>> weight and height are not stats?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> How can you possibly say that objective counting says that Ellsbury
>>> doesn’t get to as many balls?  And who the heck wants to hear about Star
>>> Trek Deep Space Nine during a baseball discussion?  How many players
>>> compared to Ellsbury in centerfield have to play in a ballpark with a
>>> friggin triangle and a center field that is laid out just like Fenway
>>> Park?  Because of all the variables in baseball, you can’t draw concrete
>>> conclusions.  You’re entitled to your opinion, but you should not tell me
>>> my opinion and then argue against it.  Stats are valuable, but they are
>>> only a piece of what I use to form my opinions.  I believe that others on
>>> here talk stats all the time and I don’t use anything but stats to form
>>> their opinions.  Or am I to believe that the few people on here who think
>>> Ellsbury isn’t as good a centerfielder as JD Drew is a rightfielder must
>>> be smarter than … say … 95% of the fans of baseball?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
>>> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:47 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Dealing Ellsbury?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I think Bill James would be unhappy to hear his name used this way.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:05 AM, William Marino <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I will take a good scout, with a proven track record, over Bill James any
>>> day of the week.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I got to see Bill James speak at the Museum of Science and I asked him a
>>> question about this topic. I asked him if teams go through all this
>>> statistical analysis, but then make the decision based on the opinion that
>>> "he has a pretty swing."
>>> 
>>> Bill James actually batted me down a bit in his answer.  He said that he
>>> felt this question of stats vs. scouts was a false question.  He believes
>>> that while stats are valuable, and need to be used, that scouts have
>>> thousands of hours of experience and also know what they are talking
>>> about.
>>> 
>>> John's mistake has been to dismiss stats completely, as he did earlier in
>>> the thread.  Stats provide insight.  They especially provide insight to
>>> those of use who do not have thousands of hours watching ballplayers and
>>> who don't watch them every day.  Fans are especially prone to only
>>> remember plays that support their opinion.
>>> 
>>> John claims that Ellbury gets to more balls than most players, but
>>> objective counting says Ellsbury doesn't.  In this case, intuition has to
>>> give way to counting.  I'm sorry, but no amount of intuition will make the
>>> number four into the number five (even if you are being tortured by a
>>> Cardassian sadist).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
>>> Just 12 Weeks"
>>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> 
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
>>> Just 12 Weeks"
>>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
>>> Just 12 Weeks"
>>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my mobile device
> 
> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity
> in Just 12 Weeks"
> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> 
> 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.


Reply via email to