That's an approximation, but I'm not sure I feel comfortable with it.  Lots
of the stolen bases must have been on walks.  So I don't know how that plays
into it.

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Charles Battikha <[email protected]> wrote:

> 188 hits
> = 143 Singles
>    27 doubles
>    10 Triples
>     8 HRs
>
> Add 70SBs - 12CS and you have the equivalent of
>    61 Singles
>    75 Doubles
>    10 Triples
>      8 HRs
>
> I
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Ray Salemi wrote:
>
> > How did you do that transformation?
> >
> > On 12/18/09, Charles Battikha <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Another stat for Jacoby....
> >>
> >> If you take into account 70 steals/12 caught stealing, you have
> >>
> >> BA:    285
> >> OB:    334
> >> SLG:  468
> >> OBS:  802
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Ray Salemi wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's actually worse than Power/Speed.  It's hitting speed.
> >>>
> >>> here are the BA/OBA/SLG/OPS numbers for both from last year.
> >>>
> >>> Ellsbury:
> >>>
> >>> .301        .355    .415    .770
> >>>
> >>> Gonzalez:
> >>> .277        .407    .551    .958
> >>>
> >>> No contest.
> >>>
> >>> Gonzalez gets on base more often and hit's the ball further.
> >>>
> >>> Ray
> >>>
> >>> PS.  This is a great example of the limitations of batting average.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Matt & Olga McSorley
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> We've devolved into the scout/stat argument again. Here is the real
> issue
> >>> in making the decision to trade Ellsbury for Adrian Gonzalez:
> >>>
> >>> Power>Speed.
> >>>
> >>> -- Matt
> >>>
> >>> From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Sent: Fri, December 18, 2009 11:46:29 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: Dealing Ellsbury?
> >>>
> >>> I am ashamed.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> Chain of Command was a Star Trek: The Next Generation episode.....c'mon
> >>> people.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> "Stat's are valuable"  First time I've ever heard you utter that phrase
> on
> >>> this list.
> >>>
> >>> And who doesn't want to hear about Deep Space Nine?  (That was an
> obscure
> >>> reference. Good job!)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Beaudoin, John
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> If you’re going to use my name, then please don’t speak for me and say
> >>> that I dismiss stats completely.  I fully admit they are valuable and
> my
> >>> point, yet again, is that some people look only at the stats.  Why
> can’t
> >>> someone say that they like the way a guy plays.  Based on Pedroia’s
> >>> statiscal body size and weight, he shouldn’t have been given a chance.
> >>> Thank God there are scouts who see beyond stats. Or will you argue that
> >>> weight and height are not stats?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How can you possibly say that objective counting says that Ellsbury
> >>> doesn’t get to as many balls?  And who the heck wants to hear about
> Star
> >>> Trek Deep Space Nine during a baseball discussion?  How many players
> >>> compared to Ellsbury in centerfield have to play in a ballpark with a
> >>> friggin triangle and a center field that is laid out just like Fenway
> >>> Park?  Because of all the variables in baseball, you can’t draw
> concrete
> >>> conclusions.  You’re entitled to your opinion, but you should not tell
> me
> >>> my opinion and then argue against it.  Stats are valuable, but they are
> >>> only a piece of what I use to form my opinions.  I believe that others
> on
> >>> here talk stats all the time and I don’t use anything but stats to form
> >>> their opinions.  Or am I to believe that the few people on here who
> think
> >>> Ellsbury isn’t as good a centerfielder as JD Drew is a rightfielder
> must
> >>> be smarter than … say … 95% of the fans of baseball?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: [email protected]
> >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
> >>> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:47 AM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: Dealing Ellsbury?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I think Bill James would be unhappy to hear his name used this way.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:05 AM, William Marino <
> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I will take a good scout, with a proven track record, over Bill James
> any
> >>> day of the week.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I got to see Bill James speak at the Museum of Science and I asked him
> a
> >>> question about this topic. I asked him if teams go through all this
> >>> statistical analysis, but then make the decision based on the opinion
> that
> >>> "he has a pretty swing."
> >>>
> >>> Bill James actually batted me down a bit in his answer.  He said that
> he
> >>> felt this question of stats vs. scouts was a false question.  He
> believes
> >>> that while stats are valuable, and need to be used, that scouts have
> >>> thousands of hours of experience and also know what they are talking
> >>> about.
> >>>
> >>> John's mistake has been to dismiss stats completely, as he did earlier
> in
> >>> the thread.  Stats provide insight.  They especially provide insight to
> >>> those of use who do not have thousands of hours watching ballplayers
> and
> >>> who don't watch them every day.  Fans are especially prone to only
> >>> remember plays that support their opinion.
> >>>
> >>> John claims that Ellbury gets to more balls than most players, but
> >>> objective counting says Ellsbury doesn't.  In this case, intuition has
> to
> >>> give way to counting.  I'm sorry, but no amount of intuition will make
> the
> >>> number four into the number five (even if you are being tortured by a
> >>> Cardassian sadist).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
> >>> Just 12 Weeks"
> >>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>>
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
> >>> Just 12 Weeks"
> >>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
> >>> Just 12 Weeks"
> >>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my mobile device
> >
> > Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity
> > in Just 12 Weeks"
> > www.leadingafteralayoff.com
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>


-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just
12 Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.


Reply via email to