They took in consideration of different eyeglass
prescriptions. John Armstrong
> I don't
care how Kadee looks at it, 10% oversized AND/OR 20% undersized
>
(or whatever) still means that it is NOT 1/64 scale. If being OVER and/or
> UNDER was "ok" and "acceptable," then WHY
did Kadee invent the #58, #78,
> #118 and #119 "scale
head" couplers for HO scalers?!?
>
> If OVERsized
or UNDERsized couplers ain't alright in HO, then it ain't
>
alright in S either!
>
> 'Nuff said.
>
>
> John Degnan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
