Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
I think that it is clear to everyone that socialism, communism in anything like the form that we have seen in the past is not what anyone is talking about, not even the theory/ideals of Marxism would have any fans. However something else that is differentiated from current so called capitalism or communism or any other type of ism would be desirable. No what I am talking about doesn't have a name but it is more social and so does sound a bit like socialism. And though I am talking about my own concept that I have developed I am sure that others when they speak positively about socialism have something much more like what I have in mind than anything resembling socialism. Rather I think that your remark is more of a troll as I believe you know that full well. The relative success of democrats/left/liberals as leaders of countries and of developers of businesses as already mentioned is what is meant not anything resembling communism. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Rick Monteverde r...@highsurf.com wrote: This is a troll, right? Glorious examples of Socialism's successes please? Thought so. -Original Message- From: grok [mailto:g...@resist.ca] Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:05 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: With regard to both energy and the economy those bumper stickers should ask: Where is John Galt when we need him? Ayn Rand gave us John Galt in fiction. Reality hands us Bernie Madoff. No one does more harm to capitalism than capitalists. - Jed I really hate to break this to people here, but the future has *always* been with Socialism -- and that includes our glorious energy future as well. And some people can rant against this all they want, invoking their rabid individualist ideology or whatever -- but that doesn't make what I've just said any the less necessary as what we must aim for. And we can seetoday, too, where individualism(sic) gets us, for that matter... - -- grok. - -- *** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! *** * BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS MASS-MEDIA: * McNews: UNfair UNbalanced * * Get mediaworx for your group/Internet/pirate tv/radio station! * Critical endorsement only Most sites need donations *** * http://satellite.indymedia.org North American Indymedia Newsreal * * http://newsreal.indymedia.de European Indymedia Newsreal * * http://www.outfoxed.orgOutfoxed AFSC Video * * http://www.afsc.org/resources/video-film.htm Lending Library * * http://www.unionist.com/song.htm Labor Song of the Week * * http://www.mirafilms.org Mira Films * * http://www.canofun.com/videoclips.asp Can o' Fun video clips * * HEY, KIDS!: JUST SAY *NO* TO THE DRAFT! * GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3 09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJoCY1Xo3EtEYbt3ERAn0+AJ0WGYt2/SyTWJp1kspoHudqphtp9ACg1i/n EBAHg9MlDUiSeposPNiaQkk= =7KGL -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: I think that it is clear to everyone that socialism, communism in anything like the form that we have seen in the past is not what anyone is talking about, not even the theory/ideals of Marxism would have any fans. List hypocrisy and trolling for Ayn Rand aside -- guess what? Reality doesn't much care what you and your friends think, fella. You're just regurgitating decades of brainwashing, AFAIC. Doesn't make what you say the least true. So what if millions of [ex-]middle-class suburban drones agree with you? They're grasping at straws, right about now. They'll believe anything in their (whipped-up) hysteria. Even fascism. Which is the immediate goal of the Rightwing of the U.S. ruling-class, actually... You north americans and brits are about to find out the very real limits of capitalism -- and all its support structures (like your totalitarian mass-propaganda media, for instance). And liberals and even neocon- fascists can burble-on about the new green economy all they want, too: your very REAL collective problem _remains_ the capitalist mode of production itself -- as the entire Planet has just found out, and can clearly see for itself right now. 'Atlantis' indeed... Beam me up. - -- grok. - -- *** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! *** * BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS MASS-MEDIA* RSS/XML newsfeeds from around * * Use these links in RSS readers * the planet: Who needs CNN/Fox? * Critical endorsement only Most sites need donations * http://southafrica.indymedia.org/newswire.rss Azania IndyMedia * * http://sopsy.com/rss/empireNotesEmpire Notes * * http://www.dominionpaper.ca/index.rdf The Dominion * *** Only *Dialog* Is Truly Free Speech *** GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3 09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJopZOXo3EtEYbt3ERAopqAKDWnzuZGeiLEm4NmceWO1Zf9jhxhQCdEnfg s0+mR6D/6Se1RLbRTZ6bkxY= =FVdd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
Hey, you're right: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480239/ For a 2011 release date, it seems a bit early to start the ads, however. Terry On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:26 AM, trevsta...@aol.com wrote: I read that Brad Pitt and Agela Jolie are huge fans of Atlas Shrugged and they have brought the rights to make the movie and will do so. That may be the reason for the bumper stickers. Trevor Need a job? Find an employment agency near you.
Re: [Vo]:I've been hammering away at the correspondence principle
Do you have any thoughts or am I misrepresenting your concept? You say Photons are formed when bits of the local field break away but would you envisioning that a bit of the fabric of space may break away when the photon does? John Berry My model is quite different than yours.? I have no aether.? My model is classical and at low energy,? It has no quarks, Higgs particles, or space fabric.. I do, owever, ask the same question as you.? What attaches the magnetic field to a magnet and what releases it to travel with the photon?? Superconductors have provided a clue.? The magnetic fields of superconductors tend to slip (travel).? Defects ( discontinuities ) are placed in the superconductor to prevent this slipping.? Following through with this logic discontinuities attach local fields and the quantum transition releases the grip of the discontinuity. The link to cold fusion is the observables has enabled me to describe this process. I hope something happes soon with these ideas. Frank Z
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
Grok sez: ... You north americans and brits are about to find out the very real limits of capitalism ... Seems to me that as the smoke cleared Grok roared loudly in his efforts of coming off as an enlightened educated individual. Ok, Grok, since it would appear that you wish to continue hiding behind the handle of Michael Valentine Smith show us your stuff, water brother. What's your ultimate solution? It would help to be a tad more specific than simply giving us a pat label, like socialism. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
[Vo]:disturbing the vacuum
John Berry wrote: Hmmm, ok excuse me but I have not looked at your work before despite being aware of it. My own research is into the aether (or void as Frank Wilczek calls his model of much the same spatial substance) has lead me to recognize that by moving the aether and disturbing it sufficiently causes it to break The paper below was written by a team of physicists who replicated the Bedini Machine. Having determined that it works, they speculate about how, and where the energy comes from. I'm looking for people who can carry on an intelligent conversation about this. Check out the author's work on the Atomic Precision website. _http://www.aias.us/documents/uft/a94thpaper.pdf_ Spin Connection Resonance in the Bedini Machine from *overunity.com http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4515.msg113072.html#msg113072*: This is a paper on a Bedini replication by doctorate level physicists. They found that it worked as claimed. The physics have been worked out to engineering level. It is overunity and it does not violate conservation of energy. *Spin Connection Resonance in the Bedini Machine http://www.aias.us/documents/uft/a94thpaper.pdf* - by Myron W. Evans (Civil List Scientist, Treasury), H. Eckardt, C. Hubbard, J. Shelburne, Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies (AIAS) ( *www.aias.us http://www.aias.us/*, *www.atomicprecision.com/ http://www.atomicprecision.com/*) I have been following Einstein Cartan Evans unified field theory for over a year now. It is being widely accepted in the industrial physics community of working scientists, but the academic community will not accept it because it steps on some pet 20th century theories, I.E. no black holes and no big bang, no need for dark energy or dark matter. It explains all available empirical observations and experimental data for any branch of physics in a 4d general relativity geometrical model, so no need for extra dimensions or string theory ( which has never produced anything useful anyway) . However ECE has been developed and tested with super computers and is rigorously mathematically correct. All of the well proven laws of classical and quantum physics are recovered as special limits of ECE theory. The kicker is that ECE predicts the ability to extract energy from space time both gravitationally and electromagnetically thru spin resonance connections. The physical laws involved are of the same mathematical structure as the Coulomb, Ampere-Maxwell, Faraday and Gauss laws of classical electrodynamics with added terms to define the spin connections. The Bedini motor properly configured produces such a spin resonant connection within the target battery itself. The battery self charges from a spacetime connection. The motor simply produces the resonance conditions necessary for this to take place, it does not supply charge current to the battery. ..from *overunity.com http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4515.msg113072.html#msg113072* Yes they replicated the Bedini patent plans. Understand that this is a greater than 100% COP device, like a heat pump it requires energy input from an isolated source to modulate a larger output from another discrete source. Space time is the relativity theory term for this source of primordial charge density that is an inherent property of the universe. Other theories might call this Aether or Gamma and Beta Atmospheres. The Bedini motor will not work if connected in a direct loop to its own battery source. However it will charge multiple target batteries which can then be used to power other devices as well as be swapped out to run the motor. But the motor and charge circuits must be isolated and the charger side is not grounded except through the batteries in circuit. There is no earth ground involved. --- the charge circuit is only over 100% COP over a very narrow range of resonant interactions that actually occur within the battery itself. The output loop and the battery form a resonant tank circuit. Adding any external load will change the resonant condition. The charged battery has to be removed from the charger circuit and utilized to drive a separate discrete load to realize the gain. --- Look at the Bedini circuit diagram. The output circuit is inductively isolated from the input circuit. The circuit possesses all of the characteristics of a simple RCL oscillator. The battery itself has resistance capacitance and inductance properties. A gel cel is a lead acid battery and for some reason the lead acid chemistry http://www.overunity.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=420bd3048c51383467f4471499b96750topic=4515.40;topicseen# lends itself to resonance connections in a practical relatively low frequency range. That other battery chemistries don't work illustrates the quirky nature of the physics involved. There would be a whole set of different resonances for different materials, many of which would not fall into practically achievable
Re: [Vo]:Ablation Cascade
thomas malloy wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the previous discussions we have had about this matter, the strength of materials will have to increase by more than an order of magnitude in order to make the ribbon possible. I do not know where it stands today. Edwards Westling's book is from 2003. They point out, however, that you could make an orbital tower out of bubblegum if you made the base wide enough; I think it was roughly as wide as the U.S. So the question is not whether the ribbon is possible, but whether it is practical; i.e. narrow enough at the base to be lifted up into space, and reasonably inexpensive. Page 21 - 25 describes Status of Carbon Nanotube Development. Some interesting points: The theoretical limit to nanotube strength is around 300 gigapascals (GPa). That can hold 3,000,000 kg of a cable cross-section only 1 cm wide. Or to put it even closer to home you could lift a large car with a nanotube cable the size of an ordinary sewing thread. Steel strength is 4.2 gig pascals; Kevlar is 3.6 GPa. The density of carbon nanotubes (1.3 g/cm3) is not only lower than steel (7.9 g/cm3) but also lower than its close cousins Kevlar (1.44 g/cm3) and graphite whiskers (2.0 g/cm3). Strength and density together determine the cross-section of the cable at the earth end. That is, the taper. Regarding actual results, Yu et al. (2000) measured nanotube strength varying from 11.2 to 64.3 GPa. But they made only small samples. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:disturbing the vacuum
thomas malloy wrote: The Bedini motor properly configured produces such a spin resonant connection within the target battery itself. The battery self charges from a spacetime connection. The motor simply produces the resonance conditions necessary for this to take place, it does not supply charge current to the battery. ... The Bedini motor will not work if connected in a direct loop to its own battery source. However it will charge multiple target batteries which can then be used to power other devices as well as be swapped out to run the motor. But the motor and charge circuits must be isolated and the charger side is not grounded except through the batteries in circuit. A quick look at the linked paper, which contains a diagram of the B-M, shows that it's apparently a magneto which is being used to pulse-charge a lead-acid battery. (Of course, I mean the kind of magneto which provides the zap to the spark plug in old outboard motors, not the Magneto that gave Professor X such interminable problems over the years.) So, you start with a run down lead-acid battery and you pulse-charge it and the result is that you get more out of it than you expected. This violates engineering rules of thumb right and left, since the rules describing lead acid battery behavior were determined using uniform low-rate charging, not pulse charging. But rules of thumb are not physical laws, and the machine can't be run closed-loop, of course, because the whole effect here is (presumably) the consequence of pulse charging. Lead acid batteries are wonderfully complex gadgets and the weird consequences of pulse charging are well known, if not exactly well understood. You can buy gadgets that will do this, off the shelf, and supposedly they'll make your batteries last longer and perform better. IIRC they cost only a little more than ordinary battery chargers. But, they're not OU, and it seems pretty seriously unlikely that the B-M is OU, either.
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
grok wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: I think that it is clear to everyone that socialism, communism in anything like the form that we have seen in the past is not what anyone is talking about, not even the theory/ideals of Marxism would have any fans. List hypocrisy and trolling for Ayn Rand aside -- guess what? Reality doesn't much care what you and your friends think, fella. I really hate to break this to people here, but the future has *always* been with Socialism -- Grok, You are, IMHO, either totally misguided, or one sick individual. socialism's agenda is the destruction of the individual. What I liked about Randian Philosophy was the celebration of the triumph of the individual against the collective. Even fascism. Which is the immediate goal of the Rightwing of the U.S. ruling-class, actually... What you ignore is that fascism is socialism with private ownership. It is a more efficient production system, but it has no difference fundamentally between fascism and socialism. Both destroy the individual for the good of the collective. You north americans and brits are about to find out the very real limits of capitalism -- and all its support structures (like your totalitarian mass-propaganda media, Calling the economic system in America and Britain capitalism may fit with your agenda Grok, but the truth is that neither country has had free enterprise capitalism in the last 100 years. for instance). And liberals and even neocon- fascists can burble-on about the new green economy all they want, too: your very REAL collective problem _remains_ the capitalist mode of production itself -- People have certain wants and needs, the limited amount of free enterprise that we have here meets those needs much better than the collectivized system that the Russians had. as the entire Planet has just found out, and can clearly see for itself right now. The entire planet is riddled with collectivism, where does this place where capitalism is practiced exist? What is it that the entire planet has found out? The fact that collectivism has failed every time it's been tried clearly isn't one of them. This misguided idea is apparently the basis of your belief that America is particular is a bastion of free enterprise capitalism. You are right, we have a ruling elite, Oligarchy, which is promoting the sort of dystopia which Orwell and Huxley wrote about in 1984 and Brave New World. If you truely believe that this is a good thing, then you are indeed sick. 'Atlantis' indeed...Beam me up. Another interesting comment. You may have heard that certain Christians believe that one of these days a trumpet is going to blow, and they are going to vanish. Well I'm one of them. That's why I'm not just too concerned about the world's continuing to deterioration. The main reason is that I've realized over the past 1/2 century that there's nothing I can do about it. --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
I find it incomprehensible that anyone could seriously support communism/socialism and actually be talking about the same thing that created some of the greatest atrocities that have ever occurred and been so dysfunctional as to then fall part. So if that is not what you mean, if you are not championing the murder and oppression of humanity then say so. There are many positive examples of something that could be termed positive examples of socialism in the west, socialistic health care practiced in most places seems more attractive than the capitalistic version in the US being just one example and you don't need to watch Michael Moore's Sicko to recognize it. On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:27 AM, grok g...@resist.ca wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: I think that it is clear to everyone that socialism, communism in anything like the form that we have seen in the past is not what anyone is talking about, not even the theory/ideals of Marxism would have any fans. List hypocrisy and trolling for Ayn Rand aside -- guess what? Reality doesn't much care what you and your friends think, fella. You're just regurgitating decades of brainwashing, AFAIC. Doesn't make what you say the least true. So what if millions of [ex-]middle-class suburban drones agree with you? They're grasping at straws, right about now. They'll believe anything in their (whipped-up) hysteria. Even fascism. Which is the immediate goal of the Rightwing of the U.S. ruling-class, actually... You north americans and brits are about to find out the very real limits of capitalism -- and all its support structures (like your totalitarian mass-propaganda media, for instance). And liberals and even neocon- fascists can burble-on about the new green economy all they want, too: your very REAL collective problem _remains_ the capitalist mode of production itself -- as the entire Planet has just found out, and can clearly see for itself right now. 'Atlantis' indeed... Beam me up. - -- grok. - -- *** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! *** * BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS MASS-MEDIA* RSS/XML newsfeeds from around * * Use these links in RSS readers * the planet: Who needs CNN/Fox? * Critical endorsement only Most sites need donations * http://southafrica.indymedia.org/newswire.rss Azania IndyMedia * * http://sopsy.com/rss/empireNotesEmpire Notes * * http://www.dominionpaper.ca/index.rdf The Dominion * *** Only *Dialog* Is Truly Free Speech *** GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3 09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJopZOXo3EtEYbt3ERAopqAKDWnzuZGeiLEm4NmceWO1Zf9jhxhQCdEnfg s0+mR6D/6Se1RLbRTZ6bkxY= =FVdd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
I agree with John, However, there seems to be a basic misunderstanding about the difference between capitalism and socialism. Capitalism works because it is designed to allow each person to make decisions based on their own self interest. This is called freedom by people who use simple descriptions. For this system to work properly, rules have to be agreed to that encourage individual decisions that benefit society in general, rather than just a few people. Unfortunately, over the years, the rules have been slowly changed by the rich and powerful. We now see the result of these changes. We now need to restore the rules that have been lost. This is NOT socialism. In contrast, socialism imposes rules that are independent of personal choice. The rules force choices based on what the government wants. Some choices must be made at the top and this requirement operates without objection in all organizations and in various ways in all governments. The challenge is to find an efficient mixture of freedom and controlled behavior. Unfortunately, too many people in the US do not think clearly. Consequently, compromises are made that only benefit people who have the largest self-interest to protect. This is achieved by keeping the rest of society occupied by fighting among themselves over irrelevant issues like who is liberal or who is conservative, or by encouraging an attack of anything that is unwanted by calling it socialism. If you want to know who is to blame, just look at what is written here many times by people who have no understanding about how the world works. Regards, Ed On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:05 PM, John Berry wrote: I find it incomprehensible that anyone could seriously support communism/socialism and actually be talking about the same thing that created some of the greatest atrocities that have ever occurred and been so dysfunctional as to then fall part. So if that is not what you mean, if you are not championing the murder and oppression of humanity then say so. There are many positive examples of something that could be termed positive examples of socialism in the west, socialistic health care practiced in most places seems more attractive than the capitalistic version in the US being just one example and you don't need to watch Michael Moore's Sicko to recognize it. On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:27 AM, grok g...@resist.ca wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: I think that it is clear to everyone that socialism, communism in anything like the form that we have seen in the past is not what anyone is talking about, not even the theory/ideals of Marxism would have any fans. List hypocrisy and trolling for Ayn Rand aside -- guess what? Reality doesn't much care what you and your friends think, fella. You're just regurgitating decades of brainwashing, AFAIC. Doesn't make what you say the least true. So what if millions of [ex-]middle-class suburban drones agree with you? They're grasping at straws, right about now. They'll believe anything in their (whipped-up) hysteria. Even fascism. Which is the immediate goal of the Rightwing of the U.S. ruling-class, actually... You north americans and brits are about to find out the very real limits of capitalism -- and all its support structures (like your totalitarian mass-propaganda media, for instance). And liberals and even neocon- fascists can burble-on about the new green economy all they want, too: your very REAL collective problem _remains_ the capitalist mode of production itself -- as the entire Planet has just found out, and can clearly see for itself right now. 'Atlantis' indeed... Beam me up. - -- grok. - -- *** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! *** * BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS MASS-MEDIA* RSS/XML newsfeeds from around * * Use these links in RSS readers * the planet: Who needs CNN/Fox? * Critical endorsement only Most sites need donations * http://southafrica.indymedia.org/newswire.rss Azania IndyMedia * * http://sopsy.com/rss/empireNotesEmpire Notes * * http://www.dominionpaper.ca/index.rdf The Dominion * *** Only *Dialog* Is Truly Free Speech *** GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3 09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJopZOXo3EtEYbt3ERAopqAKDWnzuZGeiLEm4NmceWO1Zf9jhxhQCdEnfg s0+mR6D/6Se1RLbRTZ6bkxY= =FVdd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Vo]:OT - The Rapture
Hi Thomas: ... Your recent response to Grok: Another interesting comment. You may have heard that certain Christians believe that one of these days a trumpet is going to blow, and they are going to vanish. Well I'm one of them. That's why I'm not just too concerned about the world's continuing to deterioration. The main reason is that I've realized over the past 1/2 century that there's nothing I can do about it. I think you would really enjoy an obscure film titled The Rapture, produced in 1991. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rapture_(film) Actually, this film treats the biblical concept known as The Rapture in what I thought was a realistic, even respectful manner. Granted, as you may have also already surmised from our past conversations I don't subscribe to this particular belief, but I'm glad I saw the film. I would recommend it to others as a good think piece. I think one of my main objections to the concept often described as The Rapture is that for many it would seem to imply that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about the human condition, coming Biblical Events. There is often a Razor's Edge line between granting ourselves serenity over what we are powerless to do anything about versus the courage to change the things that we can. The distinction is learned through wisdom. This is a profound lesson I'm still learning, and hopefully will continue to learn till I take my last breath. It's also, as I'm sure you are already aware, a major cornerstone of every 12-step self-help program as each individual learns to surrender to a Higher Power for which they are powerless against. While I gather you believe you are one of them, one of the lucky few who will suddenly vanish as The Rapture manifests across the planet and takes you and hopefully all your cherished loved ones onwards to a better place, I would hope you would find the time to ponder the following: What value and reward is a Spiritual Destination where one feels there is nothing they can do about what is going to happen on this planet? What value is a Spiritual Destination where one does not feel too concerned about the world's continued deterioration, presumably because their g_d will soon spirit them away miraculously from all this earthly misery. I'm puzzled, Thomas. What is your criteria for qualification for rapture status? Surely you're not implying that someone who spends his entire life and eventually dies trying to change the world to make it a better place won't get raptured, particularly if he doesn't accept what I presume are certain beliefs. I hasten to add here that I don't want to put words in your mouth. So, could you please elucidate me on this point if you would on how you know you are going to get raptured while many of us, I presume, you're not so sure about. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
I agree with Edmund ;) On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote: I agree with John, However, there seems to be a basic misunderstanding about the difference between capitalism and socialism. Capitalism works because it is designed to allow each person to make decisions based on their own self interest. This is called freedom by people who use simple descriptions. For this system to work properly, rules have to be agreed to that encourage individual decisions that benefit society in general, rather than just a few people. Unfortunately, over the years, the rules have been slowly changed by the rich and powerful. We now see the result of these changes. We now need to restore the rules that have been lost. This is NOT socialism. In contrast, socialism imposes rules that are independent of personal choice. The rules force choices based on what the government wants. Some choices must be made at the top and this requirement operates without objection in all organizations and in various ways in all governments. The challenge is to find an efficient mixture of freedom and controlled behavior. Unfortunately, too many people in the US do not think clearly. Consequently, compromises are made that only benefit people who have the largest self-interest to protect. This is achieved by keeping the rest of society occupied by fighting among themselves over irrelevant issues like who is liberal or who is conservative, or by encouraging an attack of anything that is unwanted by calling it socialism. If you want to know who is to blame, just look at what is written here many times by people who have no understanding about how the world works. Regards, Ed
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
In reply to John Berry's message of Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:05:35 +1300: Hi, I find it incomprehensible that anyone could seriously support communism/socialism and actually be talking about the same thing that created some of the greatest atrocities that have ever occurred and been so dysfunctional as to then fall part. So if that is not what you mean, if you are not championing the murder and oppression of humanity then say so. There are many positive examples of something that could be termed positive examples of socialism in the west, socialistic health care practiced in most places seems more attractive than the capitalistic version in the US being just one example and you don't need to watch Michael Moore's Sicko to recognize it. [snip] There is a trap that almost everyone falls into. It is the assumption that the situation is dipolar, when actually it is quadrupolar. Rather than just left and right there is also an up and a down, or perhaps a better analogy is the 4 points of the compass. If East and West are collectivism and capitalism, and North and South are totalitarianism and anarchy, then all forms of society fall somewhere on the plane thus described. IOW, there is an economic axis (E-W) and an order (or control) axis (N-S). The worst atrocities appear to be committed by peoples that tend toward the N-S extremes. The most prosperous and happiest societies tend toward the centre. In the N-S direction, you need some measure of control, but not so much as to stifle the individual. In the E-W direction you need freely flowing trade, with some government interference in some cases. By trying to see everything as only E-W, the economic aspects are frequently confused with the order aspects. To take two examples from the real world, China and the US, I would say that China is currently approaching the centre on the E-W axis, from the collectivist direction, but is still rather strongly totalitarian on the N-S axis. With the new administration in Washington, the US is approaching the centre in the E-W direction from the capitalistic side. In the N-S direction, it isn't yet clear (to me) what direction the new administration is going in, but the previous administration was clearly going away from the centre in the totalitarian direction. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
John Berry wrote: There are many positive examples of something that could be termed positive examples of socialism in the west, socialistic health care practiced in most places seems more attractive than the capitalistic version in the US being just one example and you don't need to watch Michael Moore's Sicko to recognize it. In the real world, all economies in all nations and cultures are a mixture of capitalism and socialism. Nowhere on earth does the fire department charge you to put out a fire in your house. Nowhere is every single road a privately owned toll road. In the past there have been some more extreme examples in both directions. In Edo Japan fire departments were private, and when two companies responded to the same fire they sometimes spent more effort fighting one another over turf than putting out the fire. The private, capitalistic model for fire departments does not work well for practical reasons. Winston Churchill favored socialized medicine and compared it to fire fighting. Firemen do not stop and ask whose house is burning, and they do not charge the victim for their services, so hospitals should not either. The key point is that no one chooses to be sick (or to recover). There is no benefit to being sick. In short, it is an unmitigated and uncontrollable evil, like having your house burn down. (There are some things you can do to prevent your house from burning down such as not using kerosene heaters; and by the same token there are some things you can do to preserve your health, but these methods are not foolproof.) There are many other reasons that favor socialized medicine more strongly than socializing other sectors of the economy. Three related developments have strengthened the appeal of socialized medicine in recent decades: 1. The cost of medical treatment has skyrocketed because of improvements in technology. Many people who would have died cheaply years ago can now be saved at great expense. 2. Because medicine is now more effective, people want it more than they used to. Most people who are desperately ill will pay huge sums to live. They will bankrupt their families to save themselves or their children, or even elderly parents in some cases. In the past you could not do this even if you wanted to. It wasn't an option. A middle class person could afford to buy all the medial help he could get, because there wasn't much on offer. 3. Doctors, insurance companies and others have taken advantage of this situation to raise their rates. In the 1930s, medical students were told that if they wanted to become wealthy they should marry money. Doctors were expected to scrape by on a respectable but lower-middle-class salary. (The same is true of university professors, by the way. At Cornell, most of the professors' wives worked in the 1930s, to make ends meet, whereas nowadays profs. make huge salaries.) When doctors could not do much for patients they could not charge much, either. Now they have the power of life and death over use, and if they are left of their own devices they will eventually swallow up 20% then 30% then 50% of the GDP. The situation is obviously out of control. The proof of that is that there is no correlation between the amount of money different societies spend on medicine and the results. Europeans and Japanese spend far less per capita, and a far lower fraction of their GDP, but their treatment and outcomes are superior to the US for middle-class and working-class people (90% of the population). By most measures such as longevity, infant mortality, chronic disease, obesity, diabetes, primary care access, end of life, quality of life and so on, the US is dead last in the developed world, and well behind places like Albania and Cuba. People who have not lived overseas or personally experienced healthcare in Europe or Japan (as I have) cannot imagine how screwed up our system is, or how easily it might be improved. The movie Sicko barely scratched the surface. I know several people in the U.S. whose lives have been ruined and families bankrupted by illnesses such as stroke and cancer. I also know many people in Japan who had these diseases and were either cured or cared for to the end at no cost to the family, with far less trauma and heartbreak for everyone, and far superior nursing and daily care. In short, the competitive, self-limiting mechanisms that normally keep prices reasonable and prevent one sector of the economy from taking over do not work in medicine. Every sector of the economy, every product, and every consumer is unique. The generalized laws of economics are only approximations and do not apply well to some goods and services. They hardly apply at all to medicine. The notion that ordinary people will shop around to find a cure for disease is ludicrous. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gawd... if I got a slip of Monopoly money for every time I've had socialism/communism -- or capitalism -- patiently explained to me (or not) by a petit-bourgeois, I'd never have to buy toilet paper ever again... Stick to tinkering in your garages, guys. - -- grok. As the smoke cleared, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: I agree with Edmund ;) On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote: I agree with John, However, there seems to be a basic misunderstanding about the difference between capitalism and socialism. Capitalism works because it is designed to allow each person to make decisions based on their own self interest. This is called freedom by people who use simple descriptions. For this system to work properly, rules have to be agreed to that encourage individual decisions that benefit society in general, rather than just a few people. Unfortunately, over the years, the rules have been slowly changed by the rich and powerful. We now see the result of these changes. We now need to restore the rules that have been lost. This is NOT socialism. In contrast, socialism imposes rules that are independent of personal choice. The rules force choices based on what the government wants. Some choices must be made at the top and this requirement operates without objection in all organizations and in various ways in all governments. The challenge is to find an efficient mixture of freedom and controlled behavior. Unfortunately, too many people in the US do not think clearly. Consequently, compromises are made that only benefit people who have the largest self-interest to protect. This is achieved by keeping the rest of society occupied by fighting among themselves over irrelevant issues like who is liberal or who is conservative, or by encouraging an attack of anything that is unwanted by calling it socialism. If you want to know who is to blame, just look at what is written here many times by people who have no understanding about how the world works. Regards, Ed - -- ** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! *BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS* Get your news analysis * * MASS-MEDIA:* from the Best on the Web * Critical endorsement only Most sites need donations * http://www.opensecrets.org Opensecrets.org * * http://www.flashpoints.net Flashpoints Radio * * http://www.snowshoefilms.com Snowshoe Films * * http://www.911inquiry.org International Inquiry Into 911 * * http://www.unknownnews.net Unknown News * * http://www.unknownnews.net/relalt.html Reliable Alterns. WebRing * * http://www.projectcensored.org Project Censored * * Weapons of Mass Destruction?? LOOK INSIDE THE U.S.A.! * GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3 09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJoyLvXo3EtEYbt3ERAv+EAKCt/LB6ZznH2oIUElv5uIQy9gk/1gCfS+js GyZbBLz8Yv2Nw1nh+HDfPOo= =/U/p -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
grok wrote: Gawd... if I got a slip of Monopoly money for every time I've had socialism/communism -- or capitalism -- patiently explained to me (or not) by a petit-bourgeois, I'd never have to buy toilet paper ever again... We are not all petit-bourgeois, and it is possible that some of us know more about some aspects of this situation than you do. For example, I probably know more about medical care in Japan than you do. It is a mistake to judge an idea by judging the background or economic status the person who presents it, rather than by considering the merits of the idea itself. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:OT - The Rapture
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: I think one of my main objections to the concept often described as The Rapture is that for many it would seem to imply that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about the human condition, coming Biblical Events. Everybody has a basic human right to their beliefs, certainly -- however right or wrong they are. But it's another thing entirely that certain fascistic xian organizations are attempting to use the cover of their religious status to try and take over governments -- most specifically the U.S. one -- and the police/legal/bureaucratic apparatus, and the military, in an attempt to impose a theocratic police state over us. And the same can be said as well for those _other_ theocratic and irridentist movements which have been attempting to fill the world-wide political- economic vacuum left after the Cold War. In any case, I can't see how people can believe any of this stuff. And *marxism* is supposed to be illogical..?? - -- grok. - -- *** FULL-SPECTRUM FIGHTBACK! *** * In advance of the Revolution: * Get facts get organized * * Fight the Man! * thru these sites movements * * Bolivarian Constitution * * http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=6831 of Venezuela * * http://www.smallpoxbiosafety.org Stop Smallpox Genetic Engineering * http://www.objector.org Central Cttee for Conscientious Objectors* * http://girights.orgGI Rights Hotline Network * * http://www.collegenotcombat.org College Not Combat * * http://www.hearusnow.org Consumer Voice for Communications Choice* * Capitalism: Individualism without Individuality * GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3 09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJoycWXo3EtEYbt3ERAvVKAJ4+GvD7bvVFqreiCX/RqX935/z60gCglLDY 9TrM5gjD1h1aMN296H5kRSY= =67gE -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Vo]:OT - The Rapture
Grok, I was asking Thomas, not you. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:OT - The Rapture
And doing so on an open list, not private email. which means he has a right to respond as well. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote: Grok, I was asking Thomas, not you. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:OT - The Rapture
Leak sez: And doing so on an open list, not private email. which means he has a right to respond as well. Grok, I was asking Thomas, not you. Of course Grok has the right to comment. You did, didn't you? My comment still stands. It is Mr. Malloy's perception that I'm interested in, not Grok's. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:14 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to John Berry's message of Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:05:35 +1300: Hi, I find it incomprehensible that anyone could seriously support communism/socialism and actually be talking about the same thing that created some of the greatest atrocities that have ever occurred and been so dysfunctional as to then fall part. So if that is not what you mean, if you are not championing the murder and oppression of humanity then say so. There are many positive examples of something that could be termed positive examples of socialism in the west, socialistic health care practiced in most places seems more attractive than the capitalistic version in the US being just one example and you don't need to watch Michael Moore's Sicko to recognize it. [snip] There is a trap that almost everyone falls into. It is the assumption that the situation is dipolar, when actually it is quadrupolar. Rather than just left and right there is also an up and a down, or perhaps a better analogy is the 4 points of the compass. If East and West are collectivism and capitalism, and North and South are totalitarianism and anarchy, then all forms of society fall somewhere on the plane thus described. IOW, there is an economic axis (E-W) and an order (or control) axis (N-S). Indeed, the other day i was looking at: http://www.theadvocates.org/quizp/index.html The worst atrocities appear to be committed by peoples that tend toward the N-S extremes. I consider the N extreme to be the ideal, though one that people must be ready for, but I am looking at the north end as being labeled libertarian not anarchist which has different connotations. (Libertarian does not bring up images of Sid Viscous and graffiti) I am not sure what atrocities you consider to have been committed by those on the north end of the scale. The most prosperous and happiest societies tend toward the centre. Center is most practical, however it misses the point somewhat in that just because things average out to center does not mean that the correct answer is always the center, sometimes the answer is an extreme. It's like driving a car, the steering wheel position will average out while driving to be centered but if you want to get anywhere you are going to have to turn tight corners. In the N-S direction, you need some measure of control, but not so much as to stifle the individual. In the E-W direction you need freely flowing trade, with some government interference in some cases. By trying to see everything as only E-W, the economic aspects are frequently confused with the order aspects. To take two examples from the real world, China and the US, I would say that China is currently approaching the centre on the E-W axis, from the collectivist direction, but is still rather strongly totalitarian on the N-S axis. Indeed. With the new administration in Washington, the US is approaching the centre in the E-W direction from the capitalistic side. In the N-S direction, it isn't yet clear (to me) what direction the new administration is going in, but the previous administration was clearly going away from the centre in the totalitarian direction. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: grok wrote: Gawd... if I got a slip of Monopoly money for every time I've had socialism/communism -- or capitalism -- patiently explained to me (or not) by a petit-bourgeois, I'd never have to buy toilet paper ever again... We are not all petit-bourgeois, and it is possible that some of us know more about some aspects of this situation than you do. For example, I probably know more about medical care in Japan than you do. Actually, you most all seem quite petit-bourgeois to me -- mentality-wise anyway (and for that matter: aren't all U.S. workers middle-class these days..?) And if you are not being exploited for your surplus-value -- well, all the more so. As for what you or I or anyone does or doesn't know specifically: that's somewhat of a non sequitur in this discussion, isn't it..? And for the record: I certainly don't pretend to be deeply knowledgable about Over-Unity, or much else in these technical fields. It is a mistake to judge an idea by judging the background or economic status the person who presents it, rather than by considering the merits of the idea itself. - Jed No, it's wrong to be ad hominem -- quite another thing. The class orientation of the speaker can -- and often is -- to-the-point. But it is in the nature of Late Capitalist U.S. culture to deny absolutely everything about class. - -- grok. - -- *** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! *** * BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS MASS-MEDIA* RSS/XML newsfeeds from around * * Use these links in RSS readers * the planet: Who needs CNN/Fox? * Critical endorsement only Most sites need donations * http://rss.newstandardnews.net/envirohealth_1.xml Enviro Health* * http://cat.radicaldesigns.org/rssfeed.php Stop Caterpillar * * http://auto_sol.tao.ca/taxonomy/feed/or/135 Autonomy Solidarity* * http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/atom.xml CANNONFIRE * * http://www.indybay.org/syn/newswire.rssSF Bay Area Indymedia * *** When the banks do well you can be sure the people aren't *** GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3 09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJo0DuXo3EtEYbt3ERApzEAKDLcQN8HB/mLfWf1qQQzohqRjFOWgCeI6Lc K/xl78X4fveXEkLf2+f7N3o= =5Fwq -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
grok wrote: Gawd... if I got a slip of Monopoly money for every time I've had socialism/communism -- or capitalism -- patiently explained to me (or not) by a petit-bourgeois, I'd never have to buy toilet paper ever again... Stick to tinkering in your garages, guys. Given how full of s-it you are Grok, that would talk a lot of T P. Any body who thinks that the world is a better place because of increasing socialist tinkering in the economy is either insane, or so full of chutzpah that he is experiencing a willful suspension of disbelief. IMHO, world would be a better place if we techies ran it, I doubt that even a committee of all of us could make a bigger mess of things than people with legal degrees have. Speaking of serendipity, Hugh Hewitt just had an investment guy on. He attributed the Stock Market's free fall to capital going on strike because of the crazy regulatory environment created by the Demoncratic controlled congress. Rather like Atlas Shrugged he continued. I'm Petite Bourgeois, and proud of it. --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
Re: [Vo]:OT - The Rapture
grok wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: I think one of my main objections to the concept often described as The Rapture is that for many it would seem to imply that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about the human condition, coming Biblical Events. Everybody has a basic human right to their beliefs, certainly -- however right or wrong they are. But it's another thing entirely that certain fascistic xian organizations are attempting to use the cover of their religious status to try and take over governments -- most specifically the U.S. one Too bad it's not working out for us. We are the put upon minority whose rights are being destroyed by the followers of the other religion Secular Humanism. -- and the police/legal/bureaucratic apparatus, and the military, That is exactly what it looks like they are going to do. in an attempt to impose a theocratic police state over us. What do you mean us? It's the people who believe as you do who are doing this. They have an agenda that's as simple as, ABB, anything but the Bible. It was Marxism, now it's Islam. What you decry, it what you advocate. And the same can be said as well for those _other_ theocratic and irridentist movements which have been attempting to fill the world-wide political- economic vacuum left after the Cold War. You conveniently ignore the stated objective of the communists, world conquest. Now we have another force with the same objective, the imposition of Sharia Law. In any case, I can't see how people can believe any of this stuff. And *marxism* is supposed to be illogical..?? Not illogical, insane. You are a poster boy for the educationally induced insanity of Marxism. --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
In reply to John Berry's message of Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:13:40 +1300: Hi, [snip] I consider the N extreme to be the ideal, though one that people must be ready for, but I am looking at the north end as being labeled libertarian not anarchist which has different connotations. (Libertarian does not bring up images of Sid Viscous and graffiti) [snip] The extreme example of free will is a lawless society where everyone is free to do exactly as they please. This is anarchy by definition, and the closest example today that I can think of is Somalia. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Re: [Vo]:OT - The Rapture
- Original Message - From: thomas malloy temall...@usfamily.net Date: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:57 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT - The Rapture grok wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As the smoke cleared, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com mounted the barricade and roared out: I think one of my main objections to the concept often described as The Rapture is that for many it would seem to imply that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about the human condition, comingBiblical Events. Everybody has a basic human right to their beliefs, certainly -- howeverright or wrong they are. But it's another thing entirely that certain fascistic xian organizations are attempting to use the cover of their religious status to try and take over governments -- most specificallythe U.S. one Too bad it's not working out for us. We are the put upon minority whose rights are being destroyed by the followers of the other religion Secular Humanism. Please provide a concrete example of how secular humanism is denying you the right to practice *your* religion. Harry
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
Well I guess that would be off the scale, those who hold it as a political ideology would assume that there is a system to keep people from harming each other or that the society did not contain dysfunction so not requiring any army/police/justice system to protect people On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to John Berry's message of Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:13:40 +1300: Hi, [snip] I consider the N extreme to be the ideal, though one that people must be ready for, but I am looking at the north end as being labeled libertarian not anarchist which has different connotations. (Libertarian does not bring up images of Sid Viscous and graffiti) [snip] The extreme example of free will is a lawless society where everyone is free to do exactly as they please. This is anarchy by definition, and the closest example today that I can think of is Somalia. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
[Vo]:Complete BARC-1500 Studies in Cold Fusion Report Republished Electronically
Complete BARC-1500 Studies in Cold Fusion Report Republished Electronically Historic Research on Neutron and Tritium Production from LENR experiments at India's Largest Nuclear Research Laboratory http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/1989BARC1500Report/BARC1500.htm Preface to the New Energy Times Reprint of the BARC-1500 Report It is appropriate that an international conference on cold fusion, now called Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) is being held next month at Salt Lake City, Utah, to mark the twentieth anniversary of the historic Fleischmann-Pons University of Utah announcement which was first made there. It is obvious by now that experiments on this field have been repeated by several groups in the world and there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the observations. If the observed phenomena do not fit within our text-book understanding of nuclear phenomena, that is a problem for science to solve. Nature demonstrates many phenomena which we don't yet understand. This does not mean we should not explore further. The need to satisfy peer reviews, (in fact there could be no perfect peers at any time in any subject,) should not come in the way of continued exploration. We are glad that an archive is being created to mark this occasion. We congratulate Steven B. Krivit and New Energy Times for this initiative. - Dr. P. K. Iyengar, Chairman (retired), Atomic Energy Commission, India February 23, 2009 - M. Srinivasan, Associate Director (retired), Physics Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), India February 23, 2009
Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
- Original Message - From: John Berry aethe...@gmail.com Date: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:18 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt? Well I guess that would be off the scale, those who hold it as a politicalideology would assume that there is a system to keep people from harming each other or that the society did not contain dysfunction so not requiringany army/police/justice system to protect people On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to John Berry's message of Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:13:40 +1300: Hi, [snip] I consider the N extreme to be the ideal, though one that people must be ready for, but I am looking at the north end as being labeled libertarian not anarchist which has different connotations. (Libertarian does not bring up images of Sid Viscous and graffiti) [snip] The extreme example of free will is a lawless society where everyone is free to do exactly as they please. A state of anarchy would work only under ideal circumstances where all the participants are equally powerful from the outset. harry This is anarchy by definition, and the closest example today that I can think of is Somalia. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk Anarchy is always short lived, because
Re: [Vo]:OT - The Rapture
OrionWorks wrote: Hi Thomas: ... Your recent response to Grok: Another interesting comment. You may have heard that certain Christians believe that one of these days a trumpet is going to blow, and they are going to vanish. Well I'm one of them. That's why I'm not just too concerned about the world's continuing to deterioration. The main reason is that I've realized over the past 1/2 century that there's nothing I can do about it. I think you would really enjoy an obscure film titled The Rapture, produced in 1991. See: I read the synopsis of Rapture, the film, it is a typical Hollyweird twisting of the Bible. Even the Torah's been done away with Protestant churches don't embrace murder. Particularly a mother killing her daughter. The (Michael) Savage is going on about the movie Milk, and the cultural degeneration that it represents. This is one aspect of the dual standard which exists. If a fundamentalist Christian pastor had beheaded his wife, the media would have have gone into a full feeding frenzy about it. However when the Islamist activist beheaded his wife in their T V studio, it didn't rate a mention, except for talk radio. The Oligarchy promotes anything that helps in the destruction of Judeo-Christian culture. I can't get on any of the mainstream media and talk about this, because they control them. I would recommend it to others as a good think piece. I'm glad that you thought it was good. I think one of my main objections to the concept often described as The Rapture is that for many it would seem to imply that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about the human condition, coming Biblical Events. I have previously mentioned my belief, that is exactly the case. When I was young and foolish, I thought that it was possible to change the world. Now I realize that that things are, the way that they are, because it follows the agenda of the Oligarchy. There is often a Razor's Edge line between granting ourselves serenity over what we are powerless to do anything about versus the courage to change the things that we can. See what you can do about convincing Grok about the insanity of his views. The distinction is learned through wisdom. granted This is a profound lesson I'm still learning, and hopefully as each individual learns to surrender to a Higher Power for which they are powerless against. David Wheaton hosts the Christian World View program. Last week he interviewed Ann Coulter. She mentioned Saul Alinski, author of Rules for Radicals. He was the first of the community organizers. She said that the book is dedicated, among others, to Lucifer, the original community organizer. Now we have students of Saul's; one in the White House, and the other heading the State Department. This is proof that we wrestle not against humans, but against a power (super human entity). It's bears repeating while we have the freedom of speech. It would seem that Grok loves of the sort of nonsense that we see in Canada. They never had a constitutional right to freedom of speech, and now there are certain protected groups, homosexuals being one of them, which cannot be criticized. I assume that Grok thinks it's OK to deprive me of my freedom to warn homosexuals of the fate that awaits them if they fail to repent of their sin. FYI, the Minneapolis library has a first edition of Dr. Alinski's book, and I'm going to confirm what the dedication page says. While I gather you believe you are one of them, one of the lucky few who will suddenly vanish as The Rapture manifests across the planet I've done my best to be a part of that group. and takes you and hopefully all your cherished loved ones onwards to a better place, We, the raptured, will be a minority of those who profess to be Christian. Worldwide it will be half. You need to establish a relationship with G-d, which changes your life, that is my definition of born again. I would hope you would find the time to ponder the following: What value and reward is a Spiritual Destination where one feels there is nothing they can do about what is going to happen on this planet? The world is, the way the world is. Dennis Prager has raised the question, why does a good G-d allow suffering? My answer is that Lucifer challenged him, he said that he would do a better job of running the world. G-d has allowed him free reign over the world, and the insanity that you see around you is the result. While he could interviegn, he has chosen not to until the time of the harvest. What value is a Spiritual Destination where one does not feel too concerned about the world's continued deterioration, presumably because their g_d will soon spirit them away miraculously from all this earthly misery. A Holy G-d is obligated, because he is holy, to bring about the expiation of sin from the world. I'd love to do something about this, but it's not my place. More to the point, this expiation will