The Euro sign is not so old. It was hacked in a few years ago. Whether
you can produce the Euro sign depends on the font having the Euro glyph
available. If you generate a PostScript file from fonts.fo in FOP
0.20.5's examples/fo/basic directory I get the Euro sign when I view it
inside a r
On 22.06.2004 11:18:27 Renzo Callant wrote:
> Problem solved. I removed the check from PSStream.java.
>
> I do wonder why this check was in the code.
I've explained, haven't I?
> Can this be left out in a future release ?
Yes, I've just disabled it in CVS HEAD.
Jeremias Maerki
-
Geoffrey wrote:
Hi,
I use the same inputstream for a FOP configuration to PDF and one to
PostScript.
The inputstream contains a Euro sign (?).
In the PDF it is shown, in the PostScript it isn't printed.
Is this a known issue or did I configure something wrong?
The most likely reason is tha
Hi,
I use the same inputstream for a FOP configuration to PDF and one to
PostScript.
The inputstream contains a Euro sign (?).
In the PDF it is shown, in the PostScript it isn't printed.
Is this a known issue or did I configure something wrong?
--
Thanks for any and all help,
Geo
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Error in output to PostScript
Uh oh. My fault. You hit a bug. This happens in
org.apache.fop.render.ps.PSStream.java. I think I read somewhere that a
single line of PostScript code shouldn't contain more than 256
characters. That's probably why I wrote that
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Uh oh. My fault. You hit a bug. This happens in
org.apache.fop.render.ps.PSStream.java. I think I read somewhere that a
single line of PostScript code shouldn't contain more than 256
characters. That's probably why I wrote that check. But unfortunately, I
can&
Uh oh. My fault. You hit a bug. This happens in
org.apache.fop.render.ps.PSStream.java. I think I read somewhere that a
single line of PostScript code shouldn't contain more than 256
characters. That's probably why I wrote that check. But unfortunately, I
can't find the reference a
Hi all,
I’m trying to render a PostScript file with
FOP.
But i get the following error :
…
[DEBUG] rendering areas to PostScript
[INFO] [1]
[DEBUG] Last page-sequence produced 1 pages.
[INFO] [2]
[ERROR] PostScript Command exceeded limit of 255 characters
Hello !
I modified PSRenderer and that functions!!!
Thank you very much!
-Message d'origine-
De : Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 13 janvier 2004 22:51
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: RE : renderer postscript : border painting
Salut Philippe
I ha
Salut Philippe
I haven't had time, yet, to run the debugger, but I think it's pretty
obvious now what going wrong. If you look that PostScript file you sent
me in a text editor you can see that there is a line "1.0 1.0 1.0
setrgbcolor" at the beginning of page 1 which is mis
Hello !
you will find, in enclosure, a small sample
Philippe Pithon
-Message d'origine-
De : Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 9 janvier 2004 15:25
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: renderer postscript : border painting
Not a known problem (or I forgot
Not a known problem (or I forgot about it). Please post a small sample
FO document that shows the problem. I may be able to point you to the
right place in PSRenderer.
On 09.01.2004 09:37:06 Philippe PITHON wrote:
> FOP 0.20.5
> in postscript generation I encounter an problem
> it
FOP 0.20.5
in postscript generation I encounter an problem
it's a document with many tables, there are invisible
border
on the 1st page the border are invisible
it's OK,
but on the following pages, the border are painting !
known problem?
a solution?
As a workaround you can use GhostScript to convert the PDF files to
PostScript. The EPS files will processed correctly this way.
On 03.12.2003 09:24:57 Krister Wicksell Eriksson wrote:
> I'm trying to get the cid-fonts.fo example working with ps output but get the
> error.
>
Hi,
I'm trying to get the cid-fonts.fo example working with ps output but get the
error.
[WARNING] Only WinAnsiEncoding is supported. Font '1E93d0N' asks for:
Identity-H
So I guess MSGothic (used in cid-fonts.fo) uses Identity-H. Is there a way to
get chinese etc. working when using ps output
thanx, works really fine! suse
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: problem with postscript (landscape)
> Hi suse
>
> Check this out:
>
Hi suse
Check this out:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21307
This may do what you need.
On 17.09.2003 21:47:56 suse wrote:
> I've implemented the page-height and page-width in my stylesheet to produce
> a postscript-file which orientation is landscape. but if I o
hello @ all!
I've implemented the page-height and page-width in my stylesheet to produce
a postscript-file which orientation is landscape. but if I open it with
ghostview portrait is shown. is it a issue of fop or a bug of gs?
thanx
> -Original Message-
> From: Yeung, Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> I am having a problem where data put into the region-start of a document
> does not get rendered using the postscript renderer (every other
>
> Is this a limitation in the Postscript rend
I am having a problem where data put into the region-start of a document
does not get rendered using the postscript renderer (every other part of the
document seems fine). The same xml file/xsl-fo combo works for PDF output. I
require a formatted document to go straight to the printer (using Java
On 06.08.2003 10:14:38 Andy Warburton wrote:
> This currently documented as being unsupported.
>
> Does anyone know if there are future plans to allow embedding of fonts with
> the postscript
> renderer, and if so when?
Plans yes, but without a date. As usual in the OpenSo
This currently documented as being unsupported.
Does anyone know if there are future plans to allow embedding of fonts with the
postscript
renderer, and if so when?
Thanx
Want to chat instantly with your online friends
Please upgrade to version 0.20.5 where this problem is fixed.
On 23.07.2003 15:59:27 Claes Sandberg wrote:
> We are using fop 0.20.5rc3a and include type 1 fonts
> via userconfig.xml
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
Title: RE: Symbol font and postscript files
Claes:
There is a couple of things you can do:
1)The font has to be installed on the printer. The PS renderer in FOP does not embedd the the font in the same maner that the PDF renderer does. The ps renderer will infact make a "reference&
We're going the opposite route. We generate a PDF from FO, then convert it
to postscript. We're using Neevia to automate the process.
-Original Message-
From: Claes Sandberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Symbo
Hi! Sorry for cross posting this subject to XSL-FO
Mailing List at YahooGroups.
Here is my question again:
We are having trouble getting a complete postscript
file out of FOP.
The text renders correctly but the symbol font used
for bullet-lists is not shown.
We are using hexcode "•"
From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A bugfix is in CVS now.
Thanks Jeremias, thats Excellent news.
Chris
_
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
--
A bugfix is in CVS now.
On 01.07.2003 16:21:50 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> I'm having trouble with Postscript generated by FOP 0.20.5rc3a. I have a
> document containing some JPEG images. The postscript file is produced
> without error with -d option specified. However, both Adobe
w, I guess the error happens because the DCTDecode
filter stops working after encountering the EOI marker. Because there is
still some data unprocessed and because of the way images are currently
written to PostScript this leads to an error.
I'm currently figuring out how best to solve this. I
On 02.07.2003 11:06:35 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Thanks for the update Jeremias. I would be grateful if you could shed any
> light on this.
>
> One thing I dont understand is what is different about the JPEG files I am
> using, compared to the ones you mentioned that you used in testing (in past
Thanks for the update Jeremias. I would be grateful if you could shed any
light on this.
One thing I dont understand is what is different about the JPEG files I am
using, compared to the ones you mentioned that you used in testing (in past
threads on this)
PSP reports that my JPEGs are 24 bit/
Correction: I've just dropped my current ASCII85OutputStream in the
maintenance branch but the bug persists. There's must be another one.
Will investigate.
On 01.07.2003 17:18:20 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Almost suspected itI believe it's a bug in the ASCII-85 encoder
> which I've fixed in the
Most probably, yes. It's a bug that only surfaces with a handful of
files. That's probably the reason why it didn't come up before.
On 01.07.2003 17:23:38 Clay Leeds wrote:
> On 7/1/2003 8:18 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Almost suspected itI believe it's a bug in the ASCII-85 encoder
> > whi
Thanks Jeremias!
From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Almost suspected itI believe it's a bug in the ASCII-85 encoder
which I've fixed in the redesign but haven't been able to upload, yet.
I'll be able to fix the bug for the maintenance branch later this week.
In the meantime you can local
On 7/1/2003 8:18 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Almost suspected itI believe it's a bug in the ASCII-85 encoder
which I've fixed in the redesign but haven't been able to upload, yet.
I'll be able to fix the bug for the maintenance branch later this week.
Just out of curiosity, does this bug affect
ttached the fo and two images to this
> e-mail. Looking at the generated postscript there is a bunch of Z
> characters in the image data. I was wondering if this could be a
> transparency issue or something like that. Your thoughts would be greatly
> appreciated.
Jeremias Maerki
Hi George,
thanks for your quick reply. I have attached the fo and two images to this
e-mail. Looking at the generated postscript there is a bunch of Z
characters in the image data. I was wondering if this could be a
transparency issue or something like that. Your thoughts would be greatly
Could you send a sample fo and jpeg image?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JPEG images in Postscript
Hi All,
I'm having trouble with Postscript generated by FOP 0.20.5rc3a. I h
Hi All,
I'm having trouble with Postscript generated by FOP 0.20.5rc3a. I have a
document containing some JPEG images. The postscript file is produced
without error with -d option specified. However, both Adobe Distiller and
Ghostview fail to open the Posctscript. This is the output
bject: Re: multipage postscript files
>
>
> Using Ghostscript you can merge 2 or more pdf files.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Torsten Erler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:05 PM
> Subject: RE: multi
Using Ghostscript you can merge 2 or more pdf files.
- Original Message -
From: "Torsten Erler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: multipage postscript files
> Ok Thanx Jeremias, U'r sugges
Ok Thanx Jeremias, U'r suggestions were very helpful for me.
cu Torsten
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 13:54
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: multipage postscript files
>
>
>
>
On 17.06.2003 13:47:58 Torsten Erler wrote:
> The last one sounds good...
>
> Any other Idea (don't know whether it works):
> I've tried to distill the postscript file by GhostScript and the result
> looks good.
> It creates a pdf site for each postcript page.
>
The last one sounds good...
Any other Idea (don't know whether it works):
I've tried to distill the postscript file by GhostScript and the result
looks good.
It creates a pdf site for each postcript page.
Can I append/insert the created pdf into the original one, created by FOP?
cu
As I said, external-graphic is not suited to display multi-page images.
The behaviour of layouting multi-page images is not defined in the spec.
If the PostScript pages are the only content on a page and you use FOP
to basically print a header page only, then you could distill your PS
file to PDF
Hi Jeremias...
I use FOP among other things to create customer proofs for advertisements
sold by our system.
Now we've to implement selling of double-sided display ads (yellow pages
etc...).
The Advertisements are stored in postscript format (also the multipage ads).
Now the proo
That's really a new use case, you know. And external-graphic is not
really suited to do that at all. Please tell us what exactly you need to
do. Are you trying to do some kind of PS2PDF/Distiller thing? Do you
want to append a few pages from a PostScript file to a PDF you're
generating w
Hi
all,
I've tried to insert
a multipage postscript document into a pdf-document (via external-graphic)
but the result looks not as expected (only one side was rendered and the
different pages are overdrawing each to the other).
I'm afraid that the
feature isn't implement
This is fixed now in CVS (maintenance branch), thanks to Zhong(George)
Yi. I didn't look hard enough. :-)
On 05.06.2003 15:42:43 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I've tried to track down the problem but I don't have a clue at the
> moment. I've added a Bugzilla entry for this so this doesn't get lost:
> h
list would be better suited as EPS or SVG anyway if you ask
me.
On 04.06.2003 14:34:35 Jan Bernhardt wrote:
> I want to use the Postscript renderer for regular report printing.
> Unfortunately there are a few glitches which keep from doing so: JPEGs (at
> least the ones I tried) cause r
The problem with JPEG images could be related to the fact that it's
> > the only feature that uses PostScript Level 3 code which may not be
> > available on your printer. Does it work when you open the PostScript
> > file in GhostView?
>
> No, it does not work either. And I
enance
> branch code. Help is always welcome.
>
> The problem with character set encodings should be fixed in CVS.
Good to hear, I'm gonna check this out.
> The problem with JPEG images could be related to the fact that it's
> the only feature that uses PostScript Level 3 c
in CVS.
The problem with JPEG images could be related to the fact that it's the
only feature that uses PostScript Level 3 code which may not be
available on your printer. Does it work when you open the PostScript
file in GhostView?
On 04.06.2003 14:34:35 Jan Bernhardt wrote:
> I want to
Hi,
I want to use the Postscript renderer for regular report printing.
Unfortunately there are a few glitches which keep from doing so: JPEGs (at
least the ones I tried) cause range errors and the Euro sign doesn't print due
to wrong charset mapping.
The first problem can be resolv
Hi there,
has anyone got an example on how to implement PCL and/or Postcript printing
directly to a printer in a servlet using FOP? Couldn´t find anything like
it.
Yepp
OutputStream out = null;
//IP-Stream Printing
if( iPPrinting)
{
Socket s = new Socket( printerName, printerPort );
Hi there,
has anyone got an example on how
to implement PCL and/or Postcript printing
directly to a printer in a
servlet using FOP? Couldn´t find anything like it.
Thanks in advance for any
help
Normen
Ethan,
I don't know if you monitor fop-dev but Zhong(George) Yi has sent a
bugfix and I've just applied it to CVS (maintenance branch). The thing
looks better now. You may want to try again.
On 09.05.2003 17:02:18 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I was able to reproduce the problem. So you are creating a
:-(
I hope the next version of this IPP Client(v2) will be better :-)
Thank you for your help and suggestions.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
On 12.05.2003 14:06
On 12.05.2003 14:06:43 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
>
> Well, that is pretty much the big picture.
>
> Java has an API defined for implementing a PrintService and
> DocPrintJobs.
>
> Java's default PrintServices rely on lpr.
>
> I have build a true IPP client that fits into Java
nt architecture.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
On 09.05.2003 18:26:11 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Does it have to be a png ?
No. That w
On 09.05.2003 21:29:18 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Leet, Ethan C wrote:
> > I see the image I want, but the image's text is jumbled and not
> > clear.
>
> Sounds like
> http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#svg-text
You could be right.
> I guess SVG wont render to PS.
It does (to a certain degre
Leet, Ethan C wrote:
I see the image I want, but the image's text is jumbled and not
clear.
Sounds like
http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#svg-text
I guess SVG wont render to PS.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
On 09.05.2003 18:26:11 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Does it have to be a png ?
No. That was just an example.
> I am creating the SVG with the SVGGraphics2D.
Not sure, but why don't you try to render directly with
PDF(Document)Graphics2D or PS(Document)Graphics2D?
Maybe
: Re: PostScript
On 09.05.2003 18:00:34 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
>
> I change my code to use
>
>src=url(/tmp/tmp.svg)/>
>
> No the process locks some where ??
Did you close your temporary file? Anyway, I don't think you will have
to write a tempor
On 09.05.2003 18:00:34 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
>
> I change my code to use
>
>src=url(/tmp/tmp.svg)/>
>
> No the process locks some where ??
Did you close your temporary file? Anyway, I don't think you will have
to write a temporary file with the approach described in the oth
On 09.05.2003 17:07:29 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
>
> Yes this is correct :-)
>
> If I use fo:external-graphic, then I will have to write the SVG data
> to a tmp file
> then pass a URL to the fo:external-graphic to the tmp file ?
No, if the only element in your SVG in an image eleme
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
I was able to reproduce the problem. So you are creating an XSL-FO
document and using an fo:instream-foreign-object with embedded SVG that
only contains an image element. Is that correct? Exactly this
the data in it, but the
image never apears ?
If I get an image, I will diff the files ??
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
I was able to reproduce the problem. So
gt;
> > The image has text in it, the text was jumbled.
> >
> > So I used the PSRenderer to create a Postscript file.
> >
> > Yet I can't view the file in gv ghostview ?
> >
> > Can anyone provide any advice ?
Jeremias Maerki
--
I was able to reproduce the problem. So you are creating an XSL-FO
document and using an fo:instream-foreign-object with embedded SVG that
only contains an image element. Is that correct? Exactly this
constellation obviously triggers a bug somewhere in the SVG part of the
PS renderer. Using an fo:e
to render an image into PDF with the PDFRenderer.
>
> The image has text in it, the text was jumbled.
>
> So I used the PSRenderer to create a Postscript file.
>
> Yet I can't view the file in gv ghostview ?
>
> Can anyone provide any advi
FOTree.
I can include the code file.
Thank you
Ethan
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 7:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
Send me the generated PS file (and FO) off-list. I'll have a look
Send me the generated PS file (and FO) off-list. I'll have a look at it
in about 3 hours, when I'm back. Got to go now...
On 09.05.2003 13:04:48 Leet, Ethan C wrote:
>
> There are no errors when I render the file.
>
> When I call gv test.ps
>
> to open ghost view, ghost view
I am only using the Driver class to set the renderer by RENDER_*
??
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
What do you mean with "I can't view the file in
xt is jumbled and not
clear.
Any suggestions ?
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PostScript
What do you mean with "I can't view the file in GhostView"? Do you get
erro
age has text in it, the text was jumbled.
>
> So I used the PSRenderer to create a Postscript file.
>
> Yet I can't view the file in gv ghostview ?
>
> Can anyone provide any advice ?
Jeremias Maerki
-
I first tried to render an image into PDF with the PDFRenderer.
The image has text in it, the text was jumbled.
So I used the PSRenderer to create a Postscript file.
Yet I can't view the file in gv ghostview ?
Can anyone provide any advice ?
Than
Sorry for the delay. I've looked up that private discussion with Claes
Bergsten. The theory is that that particular Xerox PDF RIP has a bug in
the PDF to PostScript conversion which causes the subsequent PostScript
RIP to choke on PDF XObjects (which are normally used to hold images).
You
Title: RE: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
Thanks
the sample pdf of fop 0.12.0.2 doesnt print properly on the postscript printers but the fop 0.20rc samples works fine...:-)) Now got the clue of the problem..Thanks a lot
Best Regards
Ahmed Ferdous
Team
06 Ferdous Ahmed wrote:
> Again. We have around 20 reports. So the change in FOp and Cocoon version
> will be a big one. Are you sure that the Postscript printing problem will be
> gone after upgrading the version ?
Jeremias Maerki
-
Title: RE: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
Hello,
Again. We have around 20 reports. So the change in FOp and Cocoon version will be a big one. Are you sure that the Postscript printing problem will be gone after upgrading the version ?
Best Regards
Ahmed Ferdous
I can't tell for Cocoon, but for FOP this means adjusting your
stylesheets for XSL-FO recommendation. 0.12.2 will still be using an old
working draft of XSL-FO. Shouldn't be too much work.
On 14.02.2003 15:37:36 Ferdous Ahmed wrote:
> what might be the changes I have to make If I upgrade Cocoon an
Title: RE: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
what might be the changes I have to make If I upgrade Cocoon and FOP ?
Best Regards
Ahmed Ferdous
Team Leader
Ok, you do realize that you've got a very, very, very ancient version of
FOP there (0.12.2)? We're at 0.20.5rc now. You should consider upgrading
Cocoon and FOP.
On 14.02.2003 14:57:34 Ferdous Ahmed wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
> Please see the attached two pdf files. The ghostscript gives the
Title: RE: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
hello,
Thanks for your reply.
Please see the attached two pdf files. The ghostscript gives the same output as the distilled one.
Best Regards
Ahmed Ferdous
Team Leader
Sounds to me like the PostScript driver screws up. What does the PDF
look like in GhostScript? Maybe you could post a small example showing
this effect (original PDF (one page) and another PDF generated through
Distiller)?
On 14.02.2003 12:17:58 Ferdous Ahmed wrote:
> We are developing
Title: Problem printing Cocoon/FOP generated in Postscript printer
Hello,
We are developing an Enterprise Application in J2EE. Our client has request to print all the reports in pdf.
We used the Coccon/FOP framework for this. The pdf has been produced properly (it can be viewed perfectly
I'm late for the show, sorry. I'd like to point you to a discussion I
had with Claes Bergsten. I think he had the same problem (also on a
Xerox RIP). We two had a private exchange then (so not the whole
discussion is in the archive, I'll have to dig up the content of my old
company account), but I
Victor Mote wrote:
> be a short-term fix that wouldn't affect their workflow. Another
> workaround
> to explore is to output PostScript from PDF & see if it works better.
Sorry, this should say "output PostScript
Patrick Branley wrote:
> The RIP can accept a PDF file, which then im assuming converts it to
> postscript before output.
>
> If you open a PDF in Acrobat with distiller set up as a printer device you
> can print a PDF to another PDF file. Using this process the new PDF file
>
The RIP can accept a PDF file, which then im assuming converts it to
postscript before output.
If you open a PDF in Acrobat with distiller set up as a printer device you
can print a PDF to another PDF file. Using this process the new PDF file
will pass through the RIP with no problems.
Patrick
this affects their workflow and
> we plan to
> send a large number of files to them per year so this isn't a
> viable option.
Hmmm. We're missing something here. When you say that your printer distilled
the file in Acrobat, where did the printer get the PostScript code to do
Hi Clay
I updated the Jar files to 0.20.4 and still no solution. I have yet to try
0.20.5rc.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Postscript Error when RIPing document created
PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Postscript Error when RIPing document created with FOP
Hi
I have PDF document created with FOP that I sent to Xerox Docucolor 2060
using a Scitex Spire RIP that failed with the following error:
Type Date&TimeStage Message
E
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Branley
Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2003 3:20 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Postscript Error when RIPing document created with FOP
Hi
I have PDF document created with FOP that I sent to Xerox Docucolor 2060
using a Scitex Spire RIP t
on dot-matrix printers?
A few times ago, you had carried out tests on dot-matrix...
did you progress?
-Message d'origine-
De : Mirko Sertic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 29 janvier 2003 15:26
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : AW: PS & PostScript
Hello!
that soun
Paper tray control
> Von: Mirko Sertic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Given the following
requirements :
>
> 1. i need to produce an invoice or order using fop.
> 2. i need to specify the tray to which each page is printed out.
> 3. i want to support non ps-able printer.
> 4. i need a pdf file for our
On 31.01.2003 15:32:30 Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 03:23, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > But be sure to try converting a PDF on
> > the Windows Acrobat Reader to PostScript to see if it will work at all.
> > The Windows version uses the same code as the Li
x27;t recommend this at the moment if you're not having a lot of
> time at your disposal. Granted, it would be cool if you added the
> feature, but it's a lot of work, especially since the PostScript
> renderer's character handling (encodings etc.) is not quite correct
>
On 31.01.2003 02:19:03 Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 05:12, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > > Is there any other tool that can convert PDF to PostScript in Windows?
> >
> > Win32 port of pdftops from the xpdf package perhaps:
> >
> > http://s
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo