[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread TurquoiseB



--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From my 12 year experience in Alanon 12 step it would appear to me
 that virtualy all of us were attracted to the movement because of 
 our abusive backgrounds. Not only were most of us that way but it 
 would appear from my 7 year residency here that the unhealthiest 
 of us ended up moving to FF to get to the bottom of our issues. 
 It would never fly as research on campus but you don't have to 
 talk to very many people to realize that we all came with a heavy 
 load of karma. My own research in helping those around me says 
 that everyone you scratch has a load of that stuff and most of it 
 has been papered over as in we can transcent our way through it. 
 My experience is the only way through it is out through the 
 bottom. One has to hit bottom to move on. Basic story for all 
 addicts, hit bottom to get beyond it. We were addicted to the 
 idea that we could transcend our way over it or around it. Not
 so. Bottom or nothing. That is my personal opinion. Tom
 PS the statistics given in the book When Society Becomes an Addict
 by Ann Marie Wilson Schief says that 98% of us have serious abuse 
 issues.

Just following up because I think it's an interesting
subject, I think that the key to the above point of 
view is in the last sentence. That is, one tends to 
view the world in terms of one's own experience. The
author in question had problems with addiction; there-
fore she sees 98% of the people around her as having
had problems with addiction, a point of view that is
so obviously distorted it barely deserves comment.

One *can* structure a world view around that level of
projection, but it isn't necessarily a valid world
view. The world is as we are is true, but only true
1) as long as one gives in to past samskaras and 
stays in the same old tired state of attention and
interprets one's experiences in the same old tired
way that they appear from that state of attention, 
and 2) as long as there is a 'we' *to* interpret things. 

There *is* a demonstrable likelihood in spiritual commun-
ities to see people who are coming from a this-life
history of abuse, either at the hands of other people
or from within. But that's just one segment of the
people who wind up attracted to spiritual communities.
Others are there for completely different reasons, and
carry with them an entirely different set of karmas.

In my case, addiction has never been much of a problem
(knock wood). I was always able to pretty much take any
of the substances I dabbled with or leave them. In the
end I mainly left them. But in my case there was a 
sense of *familiarity* with the better days of the
TMO as a spiritual community that felt right to me
at the time. With time, it became evident that -- from
my perspective -- it was a spiritual community that 
was missing the most important component of a spiritual
community -- compassion and caring for the other members
of the community -- and that as such it just wasn't the
place for me. But for others it provides as close as 
they think they're going to get in this incarnation, 
and as such is a fertile field for the kind of growth
they wish to undertake.

Also, one facet of the ongoing mystery of spiritual
communities that I think a lot of people ignore is
how much baggage the students bring *with* them when
they flock to a spiritual teacher. With a strong teacher,
one who is experienced in dealing with students, the
less-than-positive baggage is discouraged, or not 
tolerated, and doesn't proliferate through the organ-
ization as it grows. However, with a less-than-experienced
teacher (and *do* remember that Guru Dev *discouraged*
Maharishi from being a teacher, setting him instead on
a path of silence and reclusivity), the baggage that
the students carry with them can and does proliferate
within the community. As a result you often see strong
hierarchical power games start to emerge as people who
are used to fighting or toadying their way to the top
do so within yet another organization, or you see 
people who have a tendency to dominate other people
using the spiritual organization as a mechanism for
doing that all over again. When such behavior is 
tolerated within a spiritual community, well duh...of
course it can be interpreted as an integral *part* of
a spiritual community, and that is not necessarily
true; I have encountered communities in which none
of that stuff is present. It isn't present because
it would never be tolerated. And yet in other spiritual
communities, it seems to define them.

It's a real puzzle, and one of the reasons I still hang
out here, and on other spiritual forums representing
traditions I've never been part of. The more things
seem different, the more they stay the same, across the
board. You see the same kinds of issues that people
talk about here with regard to TM and the TMO crop up
in almost *all* forums dealing with spiritual commun-
ities. 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 blissbunn1 writes snipped:
 Whoever asked about how many meditators, siddha's, teachers yadda
 yadda had abusive childhoods is on to a very illuminating thesis. Do
 you think a study like that could be included in the collected
 research on TM?
 
 Tom T:
 From my 12 year experience in Alanon 12 step it would appear to me
 that virtualy all of us were attracted to the movement because of our
 abusive backgrounds. Not only were most of us that way but it would
 appear from my 7 year residency here that the unhealthiest of us ended
 up moving to FF to get to the bottom of our issues. It would never fly
 as research on campus but you don't have to talk to very many people
 to realize that we all came with a heavy load of karma. My own
 research in helping those around me says that everyone you scratch has
 a load of that stuff and most of it has been papered over as in we can
 transcent our way through it. My experience is the only way through it
 is out through the bottom. One has to hit bottom to move on. Basic
 story for all addicts, hit bottom to get beyond it. We were addicted
 to the idea that we could transcend our way over it or around it. Not
 so. Bottom or nothing. That is my personal opinion. Tom
 PS the statistics given in the book When Society Becomes an Addict by
 Ann Marie Wilson Schief says that 98% of us have serious abuse issues.


So, by the 98% statistic, the TMO is loaded with perfectly average people.

IOW, its a meaningless statistic in this context.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In 
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
 
  blissbunn1 writes snipped:
  Whoever asked about how many meditators, siddha's, teachers yadda
  yadda had abusive childhoods is on to a very illuminating thesis.
  Do you think a study like that could be included in the collected
  research on TM?
  
  Tom T:
  From my 12 year experience in Alanon 12 step it would appear to me
  that virtualy all of us were attracted to the movement because of 
  our
  abusive backgrounds. Not only were most of us that way but it would
  appear from my 7 year residency here that the unhealthiest of us 
  ended
  up moving to FF to get to the bottom of our issues. It would never 
  fly as research on campus but you don't have to talk to very many 
  people to realize that we all came with a heavy load of karma. \
 
 'Way too much self importance here for me.
 
 I never had the least hint of an abusive life. I think
 the person who originally postulated that theory got
 it *backwards*. People are drawn to TM and movements
 like it because they're *used* to them, but not from
 this life.
 
 That is, they've paid their dues in so many monastic,
 reclusive spiritual communities over the incarnations
 that the first time one appears in one's current life-
 time one tends to glom onto it, thinking it will be
 like the communities one hazily remembers from previous
 lives. Sigh...obviously t'ain't always so.
 
 Then again, maybe all those lives in Asian monastic
 communities weren't nearly as problem-free as we like
 to tell ourselves, either.
 
 Anyway, I just had to go on record as saying that for
 once I completely disagree with Tom T. That's so rare
 it deserved a post. :-)


To be perfectly honest, when I started TM, I was a flake. I'm still a flake, but perhaps a 
more mature one. A few weeks after I started TM at the age of 18, I called a girl that I 
knew from H.S. and chatted a while. She wanted to know what I'd been doing because I 
was years more mature than I had been just a month or so earlier. Likewise, when I ran 
with a New Age type person a year or two later, everyone in the New Age community 
commented that he had an ancient soul while mine was brand new. These days, the New 
Age folk often comment that *I* have an ancient soul. Of course, I have solid gray hair 
now, so perhaps thats all it is (the guy I ran 30 years ago was the same age as I was or 
even younger so it wasn't the gray hair in his case).

I don't know for certain that TM has helped me in any way, shape or form, but I still notice 
a reduction in my ability to cope with life when I skip practice, and so does my family.

Not to mention that my dad had already had heart problems by this age, and he was NOT 
100 pounds overweight as I am. My BP was 125/70 last I checked and almost never goes 
above that.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 In other words, after nearly 40 years on a spiritual
 path, I really don't believe that the only way one can
 get past one's samskaras is to bottom out on them.
 One can also transcend them, or have them fall away
 and be left behind as effortlessly as a snake leaves
 behind last season's skin. The process is probably
 different for every seeker, and probably has been 
 different for every seeker ever born in human
 history.


Regardless of how relatively low (or high) the bottom is, one can go up only AFTER one has 
bottomed out. Of course, any of these may be local minima, but one can hope that the 
latest one is the absolute minimum.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] 'The Technology of the Future'

2006-05-23 Thread Robert Gimbel



--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  2 degrees Gemini  The Angels of Technical Inventions  Also known as  The Angels of 'Yparcha'Beloved,'We are in charge of the custody of technical inventions.  Under seal  of secrecy, we tell a mature person what progress the world will have  made in fifty, in a hundred or in even more years than that as far as  technical inventions are concerned.  We inspire, by intuition,  technical inventions to the mature person when the time is right.'The highest power of electrical resonance of The Unified Field is  accessed from the slowest Delta brainwave state of Pure Being unified  with Divine Consciousness and all Creation. From a state of Pure Being and unity with ALL,
 omnipotent divine will  for the highest good of all then flows into a visualized image like  lightening. It flows into the level of mind, the Theta brainwave state  of deep inner thought where it is contemplated and understood. Both  Delta and Theta are electric. These ideas then generate flowing feelings which are magnetic in the  Alpha brainwave state, and finally these feelings attract changes into  the physical form state, which is perceived in the Beta brainwave  state of the five senses, memory, and logic. Both Alpha and Beta are  magnetic.Divine states of will and feeling are omnipotent, omnipresent, and  omniscient. Electromagnetic pulses and rhythms, especially divine ones, activate  changes.  Inwardly they activate powerful psychoactive chemicals in  the pineal, pituitary, and other glands. In this way the genius of  miracle working is psychoactively heightened.Outwardly, electromagnetic pulses and rhythms activate changes in 
 omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient Unified Field of Divine  Consciousness and Life through the Law of Correspondance, the 'as  above, so below'.The heavenly hosts of 'Yparcha'  seek to inspire the understanding of  practical applications of electro-magnetic fluids through creations of  technical inventions that serve to bring Heaven to Earth.Basic electricity and magnetism, or will and feeling, are understood  and technical inventions across a broad spectrum are then inspired  within those who are spiritually mature, who will only create  according to the highest good of all concerned.  This is done  according to the dictates of Divine Providence through the divine  virtues of 'Yparcha'.By understanding that there are two kinds of energy, electrical fluids  and magnetic fluids, and that electricity is male and magnetism is  female, they can besymbolized as the plus and the minus.In computer language, the electrical and magnetic are
 known as the 1  and the 0.The most basic principle is that electromagnetic energy is FLOWING  INTENT combined with FLOWING FEELINGS.  This is why the ancients refer  to Will as the "electrical fluid" and Feeling as the "magnetic fluid".Frequency, cycles, and the rhythms of life are the divine virtue of Y  of ''Yparcha',  shining with a pink light and vibrating to the musical  note of C sharp.  The heart is formed from this virtue.  Frequency,  cycles, and the rhythms of life are a virtue of the most dense level  of omnipresent akasha, or consciousness penetrating all, so it has the  sensation of ethereal earth, or weight penetrating all.  This virtue  is mastered in Delta brainwaves of Pure Being, the consciousness of  the infant self that is ONE WITH ALL, combined with Beta brainwaves of  the adult self, of memory, logic, and the five senses.By meditating on this virtue, we inspire WISDOM concerning purity of  INTENTand FEELINGS, the perfecting of
 INTENT and alignment with  Omnipotent Divine Will for the highest good of all to properly  determine the best frequency vibration of the electrical fluid of a  technical invention. In addition, the perfecting of FLOWING FEELINGS  with Pure Divine Feelings determines the rhythm and cycles of the  magnetic fluid.Remember that the three aspects of Divine Being are Love, Wisdom, and  Power. It is important to note that wisdom is the combination of  Power, which is will, electric, and male with magnetic Love, which is  flowing feeling and feminine.Therefore, wisdom is the offspring of male and female, or 'the middle  path of Buddha', or the perfection of the electromagnetic fluid, of  Will and Feeling. Therefore the original blueprints of perfection show  that electrical inventions are to be created and used with the highest  wisdom to bless all creation in the highest way.The longing for spiritual perfection and unity with Divine Light is  the virtue of
 letter P, vibrating to the musical note of B, and  shining with a dark grey light. The  right side of the nose is formed  from it.  It is a grounding virtue, a virtue of the earth and adult  Beta brainwaves, so it has the sensation of weight.This longing for spiritual 

[FairfieldLife] Re: How do you spell roo

2006-05-23 Thread ashelkent




 
 Take a look at the Web site of the Publishers Marketing
 Association, a nonprofit association of independent
 publishers, for more on this endeavor:
 
 http://pma-online.org
 
 Michael--you could become a member of PMA if you were
 interested. Costs $109 a year and worth every penny
 for the support and advice and expertise.
 

It looks very interesting. They have some valuable marketing aids. Thanks.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj




On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:

 The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
 requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.

She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd certainly 
say she does. esp. given her masterful overview of the development of 
this trend. Really the only thing necessary is the minimum insight 
necessary to expose the fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to 
authority and using faulty logic.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread TurquoiseB



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
  requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
 
 She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd 
 certainly say she does. esp. given her masterful overview 
 of the development of this trend. Really the only thing 
 necessary is the minimum insight necessary to expose the 
 fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to authority and 
 using faulty logic.

Not to mention killing the messenger. There is a 
great deal of resistance on the part of members of
Indian-based spiritual groups to equating the 
Vedic Science movement with Christian Fundament-
alism, but I think that not only is it a valid
parallel, it's something that seekers should be
more aware of. Far too many of them just accept
what they've been told about the Vedas and Indian
history (much of it myth) as gospel truth, when
it just might not be. 

But isn't it fascinating that when this issue
comes up, the first post reacting to it on FFL 
is an attempt to demonize and discredit the 
author? Typical.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: How do you spell roo

2006-05-23 Thread ashelkent




 I'd be interested to hear whether you're satisfied
 with the final product (i.e., with what lulu.com does
 for you). I'm a freelance editor, and sometimes my
 writer clients want to explore self-publishing options,
 so it would be nice to have a company to recommend (or
 warn folks away from, depending!)

This particular service has a very low start-up cost (free), but is for those who are 
technically minded and can do the prep work themselves (layout, cover design). Unless you 
have problems there is no human contact at all. It's like the ATM of publishing. It does 
offers great author control. You can even make changes after the book is in print. The cost 
per copy is fairly high ($4.xx plus .02 per page) It leaves room for a decent royalty as long 
as people order directly from lulu or me. To go into mainstream distribution one might 
want something else. There's no commitment so you can always switch to something else. 
I can let you know more after I've worked with them for a while.
 
 I very much enjoyed reading the first 11 chapters on
 your Web site (which I was able to access the second
 time I tried). I do have one suggestion, though: make
 the margins wider so the lines of type aren't so long.
 I found myself getting crosseyed after the first few
 paragraphs!
 
 Otherwise, very nicely done. Congratulations! I
 hope you have a lot of success with the book.

Thanks, Judy. I guess I should tell people that the page is dynamic in width. You can 
control the column width by dragging your window narrower. At one time all web pages 
were like that; now it is getting rare. I don't really expect most people to read that much 
on screen. Don't know if I would. Something about the printed page that's so much more 
comfortable. I know I said technology is great but I'm actually a ludite. I like the touch 
and feel of real things. You're probably used to reading things on screen being an editor.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Four divisions of speech in Rgveda!

2006-05-23 Thread cardemaister




Nice example in asyavaamasya-suukta 45 (39: Rco akSare...)
of how paying attention to the word order is 
rather important in translating Vedic:

catvâri vâk parimitâ padâni tâni vidur brâhmaNâ ye manîSiNaH | 
guhâ trîNi nihitâ nengayanti* turîyaM vâco manuSyâ vadanti ||

Guessing an easier word order:

(catvaari padaani)(parimitaa vaak) 

Ralph Griffith's translation:

45 Speech hath been measured out in four divisions, the Brahmans who 
have understanding know them.
Three kept in close concealment cause no motion; of speech, men speak 
only the fourth division.

*) na (not) + ingayanti (cause motion) wink wink!











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_Marts good news

2006-05-23 Thread Nelson



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WLeed3@ wrote:
   
reduces the price making it available 4 more of us to buy  
 more of 
   it as 
well that whole milk  @ Wal-mart great news for many of us. 
 now 
   if Wal- mart 
could sell Maharishi Ayer Vedic products as well.
   
   
   The problem there is that Wal-Mart actively negotiates their 
 costs 
   with suppliers DOWN every year. As I understand it, Wal-Mart 
 attempts 
   to get their suppliers to bring their prices on supplies to them 
 down 
   by about 5% every year, which they then pass on to consumers. 
 Many 
   economists have said that Wal-Mart's policy in this area is 
 almost 
   singularly responsible for the very low inflation rate in the 
 USA over 
   the past 15 years.
snip
+++ Does this look like Wall-Mart is denying the right of the middle
class to exist? N.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj




On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
   The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
   requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
 
  She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd
  certainly say she does. esp. given her masterful overview
  of the development of this trend. Really the only thing
  necessary is the minimum insight necessary to expose the
  fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to authority and
  using faulty logic.

 Not to mention killing the messenger.

And that killing of the messenger in this specific context is an 
artifact of clinging to the idea that the vedas and science go hand- 
in-hand.

We all grew up in a technological age and so it's a very compelling 
idea, but not necessaily the truth of the matter. It could be we just 
bought into the commercial and the advertisement that is part and 
parcel of the TM PR machine. Once one recognizes they made this 
error, they do understand why that occurred and also notice why 
others would do the same or why it's a comfortable blanket to hold 
onto. But basically it's just spin to play with our own attachment to 
science as a belief system.

 There is a
 great deal of resistance on the part of members of
 Indian-based spiritual groups to equating the
 Vedic Science movement with Christian Fundament-
 alism, but I think that not only is it a valid
 parallel, it's something that seekers should be
 more aware of. Far too many of them just accept
 what they've been told about the Vedas and Indian
 history (much of it myth) as gospel truth, when
 it just might not be.

What throws people off is that Indian spiritual thought represents 
the *left* of American (and western) thought and lifestyle-- 
fundamentalism, generally, the *right*. But in India, the movements 
which seek to try to make the vedas scientific are fundamentalist, 
right-wing nationalists. They're like our religious right, our 
moral majority.



 But isn't it fascinating that when this issue
 comes up, the first post reacting to it on FFL
 is an attempt to demonize and discredit the
 author? Typical.

Yes, I'm not surprised because at one time I would've done the same 
thing.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis



TorquiseB writes snipped:
Just following up because I think it's an interesting
subject, I think that the key to the above point of 
view is in the last sentence. That is, one tends to 
view the world in terms of one's own experience. The
author in question had problems with addiction; there-
fore she sees 98% of the people around her as having
had problems with addiction, a point of view that is
so obviously distorted it barely deserves comment.

Tom T:
You might tend to disagree if you haven't recognized that any belief
is an addiction. How do I know that to be true. Try and lose or change
core beliefs. Mull it over a little and thanks for your comments. As
you have said before it is sometimes good to agree to disagree.Tom










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread TurquoiseB



--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 TorquiseB writes snipped:
 Just following up because I think it's an interesting
 subject, I think that the key to the above point of 
 view is in the last sentence. That is, one tends to 
 view the world in terms of one's own experience. The
 author in question had problems with addiction; there-
 fore she sees 98% of the people around her as having
 had problems with addiction, a point of view that is
 so obviously distorted it barely deserves comment.
 
 Tom T:
 You might tend to disagree if you haven't recognized that 
 any belief is an addiction. 

Hardly a view that most people would subscribe to, 
but as you say, we can agree to disagree. 

 How do I know that to be true. Try and lose or change
 core beliefs. 

Easiest thing in the world. Like the aforementioned
snake sloughing off a no-longer-useful skin. You
look back, and there it is on the ground, no longer
needed, no problem.

You have to have a self for it to be attached to a
belief. Drop the self, or change selves several
times a day, and what's to be attached to?

 Mull it over a little and thanks for your comments. As
 you have said before it is sometimes good to agree to 
 disagree.Tom

One could, if one swung that way, claim that beliefs
are addictions. However, given that claim, to claim
that 98% of the US population is 'addicted' means,
statistically, that everyone over the age of three
is addicted. The theory itself might be interesting
if you swing that way, but the figure still smells
of the orifice it was plucked from. :-)











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Sanskrit anyone?

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj


On May 22, 2006, at 11:51 PM, off_world_beings wrote:What are the various possible translations of the following:(I know what they mean, just wondered if there are other possible translations of them)Ananda1anandamfn. joyless , cheerless ; (%{As}) m. pl.N. of a purgatory Up. [25,2]2Anandam. happiness , joy , enjoyment , sensual pleasure RV. AV. VS. R. Ragh. c. ; m. and (%{am}) n. `" pure happiness "' , one of the three attributes of A1tman or Brahman in the Veda1nta philosophy Veda1ntas. c. ; m. (in dram.) the thing wished for , the end of the drama [e.g. the VIth Act in the Ven2is.] Sa1h. 399 ; a kind of flute ; the sixteenth Muhu1rta ; N. of S3iva ; of a Lokes3vara (Buddh.) ; of a Bala (Jain.) L. ; of several men ; of a country ; m. and (%{am}) n. N. of the forty-eighth year of the cycle of Jupiter ; (%{A} and %{I}) f. N. of two plants L. ; (%{A}) f. N. of Gauri1 L. ; (%{am}) n. a kind of house ; (often at the beginning and end of proper names.)Buddhi1buddhif. the power of forming and retaining conceptions and general notions , intelligence , reason , intellect , mind , discernment , judgment Mn. MBh. c. ; perception (of which 5 kinds are enumerated , or with %{manas} 6 ; cf. %{indriya} , %{buddhI7ndriya}) ; comprehension , apprehension , understanding Sa1h. ; (with %{AtnanaH} , or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) knowledge of one's self. psychology Car. ; (in Sa1m2khya phil.) Intellect (= %{adhy-avasAya} , the intellectual faculty or faculty of mental perception , the second of the 25 Tattvas ; cf. %{buddhi-tattva}) IW. 80 c. ; presence of mind , ready wit Pan5cat. Hit. ; an opinion , view , notion , idea , conjecture MBh. Ka1v. c. ; thought about or meditation on (loc. or comp.) , intention , purpose , design ib. (%{buddhyA} , with the intention of. designedly , deliberately ; %{anugraha-b-} , with a view to i.e. in order to show favour ; %{buddhiM-kR} or %{pra-kR} , to make up one's mind , resolve , decide , with loc. dat. acc. with %{prati} , or inf.) ; impression , belief. notion (often ifc. = considering as , taking for) Ka1v. Katha1s. Pur. Hit. ; right opinion , correct or reasonable view R. Ragh. ; a kind of metre L. ; N. of the 5th astrol "' mansion VarBr2S. Sch. ; Intelligence personified (as a daughter of Daksha and wife of Dharma and mother of Bodha) MBh. Pur. ; N. of a woman , HParil.Samasara (I'm asuming you didn't mean  "samasara" or "samarasa", but saMsAra:saMsAram. going or wandering through , undergoing transmigration MaitrUp. ; course , passage , passing through a succession of states , circuit of mundane existence , transmigration , metempsychosis , the world , secular life , worldly illusion ([EMAIL PROTECTED] , `" from the beginning of the world "') Up. Mn. MBh. c. [1119,3] ; w.r. for %{saM-cAra} Bhartr2.Parameparamamf(%{A})n. (superl. of %{pa4ra}) most distant , remotest , extreme , last RV. c. c. ; chief , highest , primary , most prominent or conspicuous ; best , most excellent , worst ([EMAIL PROTECTED] , with all the heart ; %{-ma-kaNThena} , `" with all the throat "' , roaring , speaking aloud) ib. ; (with abl.) superior or inferior to , better or worse than MBh. R. ; m. N. of 2 authors Cat. ; n. highest point , extreme limit (%{catur-viMzati-p-} , at the utmost 24) MBh. c. ; chief part or matter or object (ifc. f. %{A} = consisting chiefly of , completely occupied with or devoted to or intent upon) Mn. MBh. Ka1v. c. ; (%{am}) ind. yes , very well ; (also %{parama-} in comp. ; see below) very much , excessively , excellently , in the highest degree MBh. Ka1v. c.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_Marts good news

2006-05-23 Thread Nelson



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WLeed3@ wrote:

 reduces the price making it available 4 more of us to buy  
  more of 
it as 
 well that whole milk  @ Wal-mart great news for many of us. 
  now 
if Wal- mart 
 could sell Maharishi Ayer Vedic products as well.


The problem there is that Wal-Mart actively negotiates their 
  costs 
with suppliers DOWN every year. As I understand it, Wal-Mart 
  attempts 
to get their suppliers to bring their prices on supplies to them 
  down 
by about 5% every year, which they then pass on to consumers. 
  Many 
economists have said that Wal-Mart's policy in this area is 
  almost 
singularly responsible for the very low inflation rate in the 
  USA over 
the past 15 years.
 snip
 +++ Does this look like Wall-Mart is denying the right of the middle
 class to exist? N.

+++ Also, importing mass quantities of landfill from China produced by
underpaid or slave labor to compete with local companies is BS.
 










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Nelson



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In 
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
 
  TorquiseB writes snipped:
  Just following up because I think it's an interesting
  subject, I think that the key to the above point of 
  view is in the last sentence. That is, one tends to 
  view the world in terms of one's own experience. The
  author in question had problems with addiction; there-
  fore she sees 98% of the people around her as having
  had problems with addiction, a point of view that is
  so obviously distorted it barely deserves comment.
  
  Tom T:
  You might tend to disagree if you haven't recognized that 
  any belief is an addiction. 
 
 Hardly a view that most people would subscribe to, 
 but as you say, we can agree to disagree. 
 
  How do I know that to be true. Try and lose or change
  core beliefs. 
 
 Easiest thing in the world. Like the aforementioned
 snake sloughing off a no-longer-useful skin. You
 look back, and there it is on the ground, no longer
 needed, no problem.
 
 You have to have a self for it to be attached to a
 belief. Drop the self, or change selves several
 times a day, and what's to be attached to?
 
  Mull it over a little and thanks for your comments. As
  you have said before it is sometimes good to agree to 
  disagree.Tom
 
 One could, if one swung that way, claim that beliefs
 are addictions. However, given that claim, to claim
 that 98% of the US population is 'addicted' means,
 statistically, that everyone over the age of three
 is addicted. The theory itself might be interesting
 if you swing that way, but the figure still smells
 of the orifice it was plucked from. :-)

+++ A description above the usual class- nice to see, thanks. N.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_Marts good news

2006-05-23 Thread uns_tressor



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 +++ Also, importing mass quantities of landfill 
 from China produced by
 underpaid or slave labor to compete with 
 local companies is BS.

You mean sorted recycled plastics? I think that
they have discovered one of the scientific holy
grails; depolymerising plastic back to lower
hydrocarbons. They may end up as the world's
chief supplier of oil. I wonder if they will hang 
on to the bulk of their scrap plastic.

Anothe rissue is the 1.5 million people in their
prisons who are said to be used as slave labour,
producing goods whiuch must undercut everybody.
Uns.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] quiseB writes:

2006-05-23 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis



Tor










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: quiseB writes:

2006-05-23 Thread TurquoiseB



--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Tor

As in Glastonbury? :-)












To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis



TorquiseB writes: snipped
One could, if one swung that way, claim that beliefs
are addictions. However, given that claim, to claim
that 98% of the US population is 'addicted' means,
statistically, that everyone over the age of three
is addicted. The theory itself might be interesting
if you swing that way, but the figure still smells
of the orifice it was plucked from. :-)

Tom T:
Actually anyone over the age of two has allready had beliefs
downloaded to them they do not suspect were downloaded to them. Those
beliefs continue to own thier balls until the day they die. They
function from unexamined beliefs and don't know or get that is what
runs thier life. Yes we are all addicted unless we take every
opportunity to examine beliefs and determine if they still serve us.
How to know a belief is running your life. WHen it causes a person to
get pissed off, get angry. have ones OCD come to life. Your beliefs
are your operating system that allow you to function. Many viruses
have been installed in that operating system and funtion without our
knowledge. Examine your beliefs and see if that doesn't free up more
RAM and remove some or many viruses that no longer serve you or any
general purpose. Less beliefs more gap. Enjoy. Tom










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread markmeredith2002



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In 
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
 
  blissbunn1 writes snipped:
  Whoever asked about how many meditators, siddha's, teachers yadda
  yadda had abusive childhoods is on to a very illuminating thesis.
  Do you think a study like that could be included in the collected
  research on TM?
  
  Tom T:
  From my 12 year experience in Alanon 12 step it would appear to me
  that virtualy all of us were attracted to the movement because of 
  our
  abusive backgrounds. Not only were most of us that way but it would
  appear from my 7 year residency here that the unhealthiest of us 
  ended
  up moving to FF to get to the bottom of our issues. It would never 
  fly as research on campus but you don't have to talk to very many 
  people to realize that we all came with a heavy load of karma. \
 
 'Way too much self importance here for me.
 
 I never had the least hint of an abusive life. I think
 the person who originally postulated that theory got
 it *backwards*. People are drawn to TM and movements
 like it because they're *used* to them, but not from
 this life.
 
 That is, they've paid their dues in so many monastic,
 reclusive spiritual communities over the incarnations
 that the first time one appears in one's current life-
 time one tends to glom onto it, thinking it will be
 like the communities one hazily remembers from previous
 lives. Sigh...obviously t'ain't always so.
 
 Then again, maybe all those lives in Asian monastic
 communities weren't nearly as problem-free as we like
 to tell ourselves, either.
 
 Anyway, I just had to go on record as saying that for
 once I completely disagree with Tom T. That's so rare
 it deserved a post. :-)

I brought this topic up originally. Clearly not everyone deep in the
tmo has an abusive past, but having lived in ffld off and on for 30
yrs, it's obviously one of the major common threads among the sidhas
here, with family alcoholism being way up there. I don't have a link
right now, but I've seen a research survey of one of big
fundamentalist mega-churches (heavy into rapture, apocalypse stuff)
and the members were found to be average on most all socio-economic
factors, except about 75% were raised in alcoholic families and close
to 50% of the females had sexual abuse. To me this explained alot
about how people get heavy into these authoritarian culty imminent
salvation belief systems. I'd put the alcoholic family background of
ffld sidhas at over 50% and ex-mother divine friends of mine put the
childhood sexual abuse in that group at about 50% also.

Tom's idea of sidhas gathering in ffld to get to the bottom of these
issues is interesting -- just as this migration was underway in the
early 80s, the tmo was really getting strict against doing any other
activities and coming up with black lists accordingly, and so many
people were in fact not getting their issues resolved, but staying
stuck in the false belief that they could transcend their way out. 

Perhaps there's some connection here -- either you start facing up to
and dealing with emotional issues or you get heavier into culty group
think that enable you to suppress them better and perpetuate the
endless belief in imminent salvation through bigger groups, pundits
coming or whatever else out there.

In her comprehensive book on Kundalini, Joan Harrigan points out that
early abusive or intense emotional experiences in children can produce
a premature and unstable kundalini rising. This can lead to an
interest in things spiritual or monastic, though the path may be
difficult unless the original abuse is dealt with. So there can be
some connection between attraction to and familiarity with spiritual
settings and difficult childhoods.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread TurquoiseB



--- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 TorquiseB writes: snipped
 One could, if one swung that way, claim that beliefs
 are addictions. However, given that claim, to claim
 that 98% of the US population is 'addicted' means,
 statistically, that everyone over the age of three
 is addicted. The theory itself might be interesting
 if you swing that way, but the figure still smells
 of the orifice it was plucked from. :-)
 
 Tom T:
 Actually anyone over the age of two has allready had beliefs
 downloaded to them they do not suspect were downloaded to them.
 Those
 beliefs continue to own thier balls until the day they die. They
 function from unexamined beliefs and don't know or get that is what
 runs thier life. Yes we are all addicted unless we take every
 opportunity to examine beliefs and determine if they still serve 
 us. How to know a belief is running your life. WHen it causes a 
 person to get pissed off, get angry. have ones OCD come to life. 
 Your beliefs are your operating system that allow you to function.
 Many viruses have been installed in that operating system and 
 funtion without our knowledge. Examine your beliefs and see if 
 that doesn't free up more RAM and remove some or many viruses 
 that no longer serve you or any general purpose. Less beliefs 
 more gap. Enjoy. Tom

Sounds a lot to me like you're addicted to believing 
in the metaphor of addiction. :-)

Seriously, if one swings that way, meaning that one
wants to go (as Peter Gabriel says it so well) diggin'
in the dirt to get rid of your beliefs, I think it's 
as good a way to pass an incarnation as any other. I'm 
just pointing out that many of us have had unproductive
beliefs just fall away with no diggin' required.

You seem to place a lot of responsibility for this
'addiction' stuff on what we have 'downloaded' from
others. It reminds me of a conversation we had over
dinner last night on the difference between a certain
phrase in English and its French counterpart. In English,
one would say, I was disappointed by X. In French, it
would be J'ai été déçu par le X.

In the French, the word déçu is a form of the verb
decevoir, which is translated as 'to disappoint' in
modern French, but comes from an older word that meant
'to deceive.' This struck me as an interesting
distinction. In one language (English) there is no
implication that the person who is disappointed is
experiencing that disappointment because of the actions
of others; they could just as easily have created the 
sense of disappointment themselves, as a result
of their own unrealistic expectations. In the other 
language, there is a residual sub-meaning that implies 
that the disappointment *was* caused by something or 
someone outside ourselves. I just thought it was funny,
that's all. 

There's another word in English I like a lot. It's
'disillusionment.' Neat word if you split it apart
and see what's really going on: dis-illusion-ment.
Having the illusions fall away is a *good* thing,
no matter how it might feel at the time.

None of this probably has anything to do with what
we were discussing, but I thought of it nonetheless.
Life 'downloads' all sorts of stuff in our direction.
But we don't have to open a port to it. And if we
already have, at some point in our lives, all we
have to do is open another port and let it flow right
out again, without a lot of diggin' in the dirt. Just 
my opinion...












To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
  requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
 
 She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd certainly 
 say she does.

Being raised in the culture doesn't automatically
give one expertise in Vedic science, which requires
a thorough understanding of the Vedic literature.

Nor does being a scientist, of course, give one
such expertise.

 esp. given her masterful overview of the development of 
 this trend.

Nor would this give her expertise in Vedic thought.

 Really the only thing necessary is the minimum insight 
 necessary to expose the fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to 
 authority and using faulty logic.

Well, the last part here makes no sense. Having more
than minimum insight into Vedic science would involve
appealing to authority and using faulty logic?? How
would that work, exactly? Would you say the same about
having minimum insight into Western science with regard
to a critique of its principles?

In any case, from what I gather from the reviews and
her essay you posted, her critique (really, her polemic)
is primarily focused on the political aspects and on
philosophy of science. For those, you may be right that
she doesn't need much expertise in Vedic thought. And
certainly the essay is very light indeed on specifics,
dealing for the most part in vague generalities.
Apparently Part 2 of her book goes into more detail,
however. If the reviewers on Amazon are correct that
she doesn't know her onions in this area, perhaps she
should just have left it out entirely rather than
attempt to critique Vedic science on its own terms.

Amusingly, the review I read says:

The sacred Hindu texts, which include the Vedas and
the Upanishads, are often regarded as scientific texts
in that they allegedly contain all the findings of
modern science from physics and biology to mathematics,
as well as the methods of science. Such claims are
hardly credible since 'Vedic Science' needs its legions
of decoders and interpreters before any connection can
be made to any real science.

In other words, because the texts are difficult to
understand, they can be dismissed on that basis.

(That's the reviewer's perspective; whether it reflects
Nanda's approach isn't clear.)











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
snip
  Not to mention killing the messenger.
 
 And that killing of the messenger in this specific context is an 
 artifact of clinging to the idea that the vedas and science go
 hand-in-hand.

Or, it's an artifact of being genuinely interested in
the degree of validity of various projects aimed at
integrating or reconciling science and spirituality.

As I said earlier, critiques of these projects, if
*they* are to be valid, require an expert understanding
of both science *and* the spiritual system of a
particular project. If the proponents of such a project
were to lack an expert understanding of science, their
attempts at integration/reconciliation would be invalid
no matter how expert they were with regard to the
spiritual system they wanted to integrate/reconcile
with science--in other words, it cuts both ways.

Unlike many such projects, the TM project does have a
leading proponent (Hagelin) who is expert in both science
and MMY's version of Vedic Science. That doesn't
automatically make the project valid, of course, but
it does make it a little more difficult to dismiss.
(What scientifically ignorant TMers--MMY included, in
some respects--make of his theories is a horse of a
different color; here I'm referring to the theories as
expounded by Haglelin.)

It's not clear to me from what I've read of Nanda's
ideas how close the version of Vedic science she's
addressing is to MMY's version.

You're a fan of Ken Wilber, Vaj. One of the reviews I
read (not on Amazon; it's from FreeIndiaMedia.com) says:

One of the problems here is the tacking-on of an
adjective before `science'. Science is what it is
no matter where it is practiced, in the East or West,
or by whom; `science' with a prefix such as `Vedic'
or `Western' or the like, ought to arouse suspicion
immediately[In] 'Vedic Science'...even the domain
of observational experience upon which science is
commonly based is expanded to include super-sensory
mental experience of 'alternative levels of reality'
that cannot be encountered in normal experience.

I'm sure Wilber would agree that it ought to arouse
suspicion, because it's so vulnerable to misuse; but
he also maintains that the core principles of the
scientific method can indeed be applied to the
spiritual endeavor--i.e., that there is such a thing as
subjective science. It would be really interesting to
hear what Wilber thinks of Nanda's approach (assuming
this review accurately represents her ideas).

Here's a bit from the essay you posted:

...Everything we know about the workings of nature
through the methods of modern science radically
disconfirms the presence of any morally significant
gunas, or shakti, or any other form of consciousness
in nature, as taught by the Vedic cosmology which
treats nature as a manifestation of divine
consciousness. Far from there being 'no conflict'
between science and Hinduism, a scientific
understanding of nature completely and radically
negates the 'eternal laws' of Hindu dharma which
teach an identity between spirit and matter.

Even in context, this is pretty ambiguous. What
could it mean to disconfirm any form of
consciousness in nature? Human beings are part of
nature; she can't be saying they are not conscious.
What does she mean by nature here, and what does
consciousness in nature mean?

That aside, it's very unclear that science could
ever negate, radically or otherwise, an identity
between spirit and matter. Seems to me all science
can do is to show there is no objective evidence
for this identity--but if there *were* such an
identity, why is it assumed that it would have to
manifest in objective evidence? Spirit by definition--
by its very nature--is subjective. So the absence
of objective evidence cannot be said to be objective
evidence of absence.

snip
  There is a
  great deal of resistance on the part of members of
  Indian-based spiritual groups to equating the
  Vedic Science movement with Christian Fundament-
  alism, but I think that not only is it a valid
  parallel, it's something that seekers should be
  more aware of.

Of course one can draw parallels, but they're only
valid up to a point. Christian fundamentalism--
specifically Creation Science--explicitly declares
that science is *wrong* about evolution, for instance,
whereas according to the review of Nanda's book,
Advocates of 'Vedic Science' say that both it and
'Western science' ultimately express `the same truth',
but each in its own culturally relative way.

(Actually MMY would say Vedic science and Western
science are complementary *modes of knowing* that
discover compelementary aspects of the truth.)

snip
  But isn't it fascinating that when this issue
  comes up, the first post reacting to it on FFL
  is an attempt to demonize and discredit the
  author? Typical.

Not fascinating, but facile, and just plain wrong.

I was curious to know more about Nanda's 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Rick Archer



on 5/23/06 8:43 AM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 TorquiseB writes: snipped
 One could, if one swung that way, claim that beliefs
 are addictions. However, given that claim, to claim
 that 98% of the US population is 'addicted' means,
 statistically, that everyone over the age of three
 is addicted. The theory itself might be interesting
 if you swing that way, but the figure still smells
 of the orifice it was plucked from. :-)
 
 Tom T:
 Actually anyone over the age of two has allready had beliefs
 downloaded to them they do not suspect were downloaded to them. Those
 beliefs continue to own thier balls until the day they die. They
 function from unexamined beliefs and don't know or get that is what
 runs thier life. Yes we are all addicted unless we take every
 opportunity to examine beliefs and determine if they still serve us.
 How to know a belief is running your life. WHen it causes a person to
 get pissed off, get angry. have ones OCD come to life. Your beliefs
 are your operating system that allow you to function. Many viruses
 have been installed in that operating system and funtion without our
 knowledge. Examine your beliefs and see if that doesn't free up more
 RAM and remove some or many viruses that no longer serve you or any
 general purpose. Less beliefs more gap. Enjoy. Tom

I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and he was
saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how liberating it is to realize
that. It's like a small segment of a wide spectrum. Other segments, even
contradictory and paradoxical ones, are equally valid. So its true that if
we take our thoughts too seriously, we're addicted - we're locked in or
trapped by a narrow perspective, unrepresentative of Reality.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Rick Archer



on 5/23/06 9:09 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Life 'downloads' all sorts of stuff in our direction.
 But we don't have to open a port to it. And if we
 already have, at some point in our lives, all we
 have to do is open another port and let it flow right
 out again, without a lot of diggin' in the dirt. Just
 my opinion...

Principle of the second element: turn on the light to remove the darkness.
Tom and Mark are pointing out that the lives of those in FF who have been
meditating for decades suggest that this approach alone is inadequate. Maybe
a little digging is in order. Not mud-wallowing, but some compassionate,
honest examination of things which we might prefer to keep buried.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 You seem to place a lot of responsibility for this
 'addiction' stuff on what we have 'downloaded' from
 others. It reminds me of a conversation we had over
 dinner last night on the difference between a certain
 phrase in English and its French counterpart. In English,
 one would say, I was disappointed by X. In French, it
 would be J'ai été déçu par le X.
 
 In the French, the word déçu is a form of the verb
 decevoir, which is translated as 'to disappoint' in
 modern French, but comes from an older word that meant
 'to deceive.' This struck me as an interesting
 distinction. In one language (English) there is no
 implication that the person who is disappointed is
 experiencing that disappointment because of the actions
 of others; they could just as easily have created the 
 sense of disappointment themselves, as a result
 of their own unrealistic expectations. In the other 
 language, there is a residual sub-meaning that implies 
 that the disappointment *was* caused by something or 
 someone outside ourselves. I just thought it was funny,
 that's all.

Hate to, er, disappoint you, but if you're basing
your understanding of the implications of a term on
its earlier meaning, disappoint does indeed imply
outside agency. From the Online Etymology Dictionary:

disappoint
1434, from M.Fr. desappointer undo the appointment,
remove from office, from des- dis + appointer
appoint. Modern sense of to frustrate expectations
(1494) is from secondary meaning of fail to keep an
appointment.

Interestingly, Merriam-Webster's definitions of the
term in its modern usage do not include any sense
that does not involve outside agency either:
 
transitive verb : to fail to meet the expectation or hope of : 
FRUSTRATE *the team disappointed its fans*
intransitive verb : to cause disappointment *where the show 
disappoints most is in the work of the younger generation — John 
Ashbery*










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread TurquoiseB



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 on 5/23/06 9:09 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Life 'downloads' all sorts of stuff in our direction.
  But we don't have to open a port to it. And if we
  already have, at some point in our lives, all we
  have to do is open another port and let it flow right
  out again, without a lot of diggin' in the dirt. Just
  my opinion...
 
 Principle of the second element: turn on the light to remove 
 the darkness. Tom and Mark are pointing out that the lives of 
 those in FF who have been meditating for decades suggest that 
 this approach alone is inadequate. Maybe a little digging is 
 in order. Not mud-wallowing, but some compassionate, honest 
 examination of things which we might prefer to keep buried.

For those who enjoy that sorta stuff, I say Go For
It. I was just bringing up the oft-forgotten idea of
predilection. No one path works for everyone. For
some people and some samskaras, diggin' in the dirt
works wonders. For others, turning on the light works
wonders, and without having to wash your hands as 
often. :-)

And talk about *addiction*, have you ever met anyone
who has grown addicted to diggin' the dirt? One needs
go no further than the song I took the phrase from,
in which Peter Gabriel describes his years of therapy:

The more I look, the more I find
As I close on in, I get so blind
I feel it in my head, I feel it in my toes
I feel it in my sex, that's the place it goes

I'm digging in the dirt
Stay with me I need support
I'm digging in the dirt
To find the places I got hurt
To open up the places I got hurt

Just to sum up, I am *not* saying that I don't think
there is a value to periodically checkin' out one's
beliefs and seeing whether they're still believable.
What I think I'm resisting is what I perceive as an
undercurrent of *blame*, in which there always has
to be a cause for unenlightenment. Too much stress,
too many beliefs, too many unchallenged assumptions,
whatever. Not my cuppa tea. Diggin' in the dirt look-
ing for the cause of darkness is fine if that's your 
predilection in life, but I've had remarkable success
with just turning on the light, and I'm not going to
write that experience off just because others haven't.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and he was
 saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how liberating it is to 
 realize that. It's like a small segment of a wide spectrum. Other 
 segments, even contradictory and paradoxical ones, are equally valid. 
 So its true that if we take our thoughts too seriously, we're 
 addicted - we're locked in or trapped by a narrow perspective, 
 unrepresentative of Reality.

The trouble with statements like this is that they
create an infinite regress. The realization that
any thought is a viewpoint is *itself* a viewpoint.

And if it's true that we become addicted if we take
our thoughts too seriously, we should presumably
therefore not take too seriously the thought that if
we take our thoughts too seriously, we become addicted
...and so on.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Rick Archer



on 5/23/06 10:19 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 snip
 I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and he was
 saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how liberating it is to
 realize that. It's like a small segment of a wide spectrum. Other
 segments, even contradictory and paradoxical ones, are equally valid.
 So its true that if we take our thoughts too seriously, we're
 addicted - we're locked in or trapped by a narrow perspective,
 unrepresentative of Reality.
 
 The trouble with statements like this is that they
 create an infinite regress. The realization that
 any thought is a viewpoint is *itself* a viewpoint.

True. That too should be transcended.
 
 And if it's true that we become addicted if we take
 our thoughts too seriously, we should presumably
 therefore not take too seriously the thought that if
 we take our thoughts too seriously, we become addicted
 and so on.

If one took too seriously the thought that one shouldn't take thoughts too
seriously, one might become careless or irresponsible. There's a balance
point.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj


Why Hindutva Loves "Science"Meera Nanda(Note received from Nanda:Dear friends: I noticed that you have posted an article of mine (The Doublespeak of Hindu Science, The Week, June 24, 2001) on your website. I was wondering if it would not serve your readers better if you could post the original, unedited version of this article, instead of the badly cut version that the Week ran?  I believe that the original argument is much more cogent and forceful than the published version. Let your readers get a more complete understanding of the dangers of erasing the boundaries between science and myth. It they still disagree—which I suspect they will—let them at least disagree on the full strength of my argument. If am sending the original piece as an attachment and I'd appreciate if you would include that in your website. with my best regards Meera Nanda ) We can understand why the leading Hindutva ideas-men go around calling themselves "intellectual Kshatriyas": they are at home in a varna-defined world. But the Kshatriyas were only supposed to defend dharma as a way of life. Why, then, are our Kshatriyas so bent upon defending dharma as science? Why is it not enough for them to have pulled off a coup against higher education in India by forcing such absurdities as "Vedic astrology" into the college curricula? Why must they also insist upon declaring astrology, and the entire Vedic tradition, "scientific"?Why this sudden love for "science" in the saffron camp?  We will solve this mystery as we go along. We will also unearth a curious, although entirely unintended alliance between our Vedic warriors and our postmodern Brahmins in universities and social movements, both in India and abroad. We will find that postmodernist condemnations of science and modernity, coupled with uncritical celebration of "local knowledges" have created a climate in which irrationalities of all kinds can thrive.But first: some friendly advice to help you cope with what lies ahead…..Get over whatever mental blocks you may have against this oxymoron called "Vedic science," which pairs the archaic, mystical and unfalsifiable worldview of the Vedas with science. Put away whatever residual hopes you may still cherish that science could help demystify and liberalize our culture…..Instead, get used to the doublespeak of "Vedic science," for we are going to hear a lot more of it. Be prepared for a flood of books, TV-shows and even new computer programs extolling the virtues of Hindu sciences. After all, big money is behind it: tax-payer's rupees and large grants from private foundations (Hinduja Foundation, Infinity Foundation) are pouring into "research centers" dedicated to showing the scientificity of Hindu scriptures. If you thought that Vedic astrology was merely a personal idiosyncrasy of Murli Manohar Joshi and a handful of UGC bureaucrats, think again!Everything Vedic – from yagnas to the gods of all things, to reincarnation, karma and parapsychology will make a claim for the status of "science." And everything scientific – from the knowledge of quantum physics, to the laws of molecular biology and ecology – will be declared to be already there in the Vedas. Modern science will be treated as a Western corruption of the non-dualist Vedic sciences which can synthesize science with god, facts with values, etc. Mother India will be called upon to heal the wounds inflicted on the entire world by the "violence" of soul-less modern science.But – and here the plot begins to thicken – this will not stop the BJP government from acquiring the most violent and the most destructive products of modern science and technology. We are heading toward a schizophrenic national culture in which the technological products of modern science will be eagerly embraced, but the secular culture which science was supposed to help create will be strenuously denied. Instead of a genuine secular culture, which denies the existence of gods in nature and the authority of god-men in culture, the intellectual Kshatriyas are intent on declaring the dharmic worldview, with its nature-gods and miracle-working gurus, to be the essence of a "higher" science and "authentic" secularism. Symptoms of such schizophrenia are already evident:1.  The nuclear bomb tests in 1988 were justified and packaged in dharmic terms. Hindu ideologues claimed that the bomb was foretold by Lord Krishna in the Bhagwat Gita when he declared himself to be “the radiance of a thousand suns, the splendor of the Mighty One. ..I am become Death." They celebrated the bomb by invoking gods and goddesses symbolizing shakti and vigyan. Even Ganesha idols turned up with atomic halos around their heads and with guns in their hands!2.   In April 2001, the Indian Space Research Organization made history by successfully putting a satellite into the geo-stationary orbit, 36,000 km. above the earth. This same "space power" that takes justified pride in its ability to touch the stars, will soon start 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 on 5/23/06 10:19 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
  wrote:
  snip
  I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and
  he was saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how 
  liberating it is to realize that. It's like a small segment of a 
  wide spectrum. Other segments, even contradictory and 
  paradoxical ones, are equally valid.
 
  So its true that if we take our thoughts too seriously, we're
  addicted - we're locked in or trapped by a narrow perspective,
  unrepresentative of Reality.
  
  The trouble with statements like this is that they
  create an infinite regress. The realization that
  any thought is a viewpoint is *itself* a viewpoint.
 
 True. That too should be transcended.

Should we transcend the thought that that too should
be transcended?

  And if it's true that we become addicted if we take
  our thoughts too seriously, we should presumably
  therefore not take too seriously the thought that if
  we take our thoughts too seriously, we become addicted
  and so on.
 
 If one took too seriously the thought that one shouldn't take
 thoughts too seriously, one might become careless or irresponsible. 
 There's a balance point.

Should we take seriously the thought that there's a
balance point?

Thoughts about thought--metathoughts, if you will--
invariably lead to this kind of tangle.

Maybe it's less problematic and more straightforward
to, um, just take it as it comes.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_Marts good news

2006-05-23 Thread jyouells2000



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WLeed3@ wrote:
  
   reduces the price making it available 4 more of us to buy  more of 
  it as 
   well that whole milk  @ Wal-mart great news for many of us. now 
  if Wal- mart 
   could sell Maharishi Ayer Vedic products as well.
  
  
  The problem there is that Wal-Mart actively negotiates their costs 
  with suppliers DOWN every year. As I understand it, Wal-Mart
attempts 
  to get their suppliers to bring their prices on supplies to them down 
  by about 5% every year, which they then pass on to consumers. Many 
  economists have said that Wal-Mart's policy in this area is almost 
  singularly responsible for the very low inflation rate in the USA
over 
  the past 15 years.
  
  Negotiating with the TMO over prices? Can you imagine being a fly on 
  the wall over those negotiations?
  
  
  Wal-Mart: TMO, now that we're carrying your MAPI products in all of 
  our stores throughout the world, your products are accessible to over 
  2 billion people. We'd like you to see what you can do to bring down 
  the costs of your supplies...economies of scale and all that.
  
  TMO: Sorry, Wal-Mart, we have a strict 1,500% mark-up on our MAPI 
  products. For example, on our 8 oz. Vata Churna product, it costs us 
  about 34 cents for the spices we put into it. Add on another 20
cents 
  per unit for packaging, labor and overhead and you're talking a 
  whopping 54 cents cost to us for each one. Now we sell each unit for 
  $15.95. We're selling each unit to Wal-Mar for $10.00...tell us how 
  we're supposed to make money if we bring our cost to you down!
 
 
 Of course, MAPI products are all supposedly made in the traditional
way, which probably 
 doesn't mean much, cost-wise, since they come from India, but it
DOES mean that there is 
 a supply constraint: you can't just plant more crops willy-nilly and
increase production if 
 said crops have to be grown and/or harvested in a certain way.


Based on all the other TMO things that are most probably lied about,
do you really think that MAPI 'traditional' production practices
aren't lied about too? 

JohnY 









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Rick Archer



on 5/23/06 10:47 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
 on 5/23/06 10:19 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
 wrote:
 snip
 I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and
 he was saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how
 liberating it is to realize that. It's like a small segment of a
 wide spectrum. Other segments, even contradictory and
 paradoxical ones, are equally valid.
 
 So its true that if we take our thoughts too seriously, we're
 addicted - we're locked in or trapped by a narrow perspective,
 unrepresentative of Reality.
 
 The trouble with statements like this is that they
 create an infinite regress. The realization that
 any thought is a viewpoint is *itself* a viewpoint.
 
 True. That too should be transcended.
 
 Should we transcend the thought that that too should
 be transcended?

I think the basic idea is, take everything lightly; don't take yourself too
seriously. Sound like good advice?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread TurquoiseB



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 I think the basic idea is, take everything lightly; don't 
 take yourself too seriously. Sound like good advice?

And above all, laugh like crazy at anyone who 
demands to be taken seriously. If more people
did that, the world wouldn't be in the mess
it's in...














To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj




On May 23, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Rick Archer wrote:

 I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and he was
 saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how liberating it is to 
 realize
 that. It's like a small segment of a wide spectrum. Other segments, 
 even
 contradictory and paradoxical ones, are equally valid. So its true 
 that if
 we take our thoughts too seriously, we're addicted - we're locked 
 in or
 trapped by a narrow perspective, unrepresentative of Reality.


That's interesting because essentially what it points out, from an 
experiential point of view, is that Tolle has not reached self- 
liberation of thought. In others words, he ain't very realized.

He sure has the spiel down though.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Why Hindutva Loves Science
 
 Meera Nanda

Before I read any further, I wanted to make one quick
observation:

snip
 1. The nuclear bomb tests in 1988 were justified and packaged in 
 dharmic terms. Hindu ideologues claimed that the bomb was foretold
 by Lord Krishna in the Bhagwat Gita when he declared himself to 
 be the radiance of a thousand suns, the splendor of the Mighty 
 One. ..I am become Death.

>From the Nuclear Weapon Archive:

The origin of the name Trinity for [the first nuclear explosion in 
history, in 1945] is uncertain. It is commonly thought that Robert 
Oppenheimer provided the name, which would seem logical, but even 
this is not definitely known. A leading theory is that Oppenhimer did 
select it, and that he did so with reference to the divine Hindu 
trinity of Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Preserver), and Shiva 
(the Destroyer). Oppenheimer had an avid interest in Sanskrit 
literature (which he had taught himself to read), and following the 
Trinity test is reported to have recited [this] passage from the 
Bhagavad-Gita...

If the radiance of a thousand suns
Were to burst at once into the sky,
That would be like the splendor of the Mighty One...
I am become Death,
The shatterer of Worlds.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Trinity.html

Perhaps if Prof. Nanda ever revises her essay, she might
want to include a note that the Gita reference wasn't 
original with the Hindu ideologues; they were echoing
the widely publicized comment of the prominent Western
scientist known as the father of the atomic bomb.

(Oppenheimer himself said, however, that he'd gotten the 
name Trinity from the poetry of John Donne rather 
than from Hindu theology, a fact not mentioned in the
archive article on Trinity.)

Incidentally, there's a long, fascinating essay on the
Web called The Gita of J. Robert Oppenheimer, by James
A. Hijiya:

http://www.aps-pub.com/proceedings/1442/Hijiya.pdf











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Why Hindutva Loves Science
 
 Meera Nanda
 
 (Note received from Nanda:
 
 Dear friends: I noticed that you have posted an article of mine
 (The Doublespeak of Hindu Science, The Week, June 24, 2001) on your 
 website.

Vaj, this is a different article than the one you
already posted here, right, the two-parter?










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread shempmcgurk



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
  
   The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
   requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
  
  She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd 
  certainly say she does. esp. given her masterful overview 
  of the development of this trend. Really the only thing 
  necessary is the minimum insight necessary to expose the 
  fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to authority and 
  using faulty logic.
 
 Not to mention killing the messenger. There is a 
 great deal of resistance on the part of members of
 Indian-based spiritual groups to equating the 
 Vedic Science movement with Christian Fundament-
 alism, but I think that not only is it a valid
 parallel, it's something that seekers should be
 more aware of. Far too many of them just accept
 what they've been told about the Vedas and Indian
 history (much of it myth) as gospel truth, when
 it just might not be. 
 
 But isn't it fascinating that when this issue
 comes up, the first post reacting to it on FFL 
 is an attempt to demonize and discredit the 
 author? Typical.


That's Billie's M.O.

I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a 
Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global warming. Putting 
aside what you or I may feel about the issue, the facts or the 
arguments of the piece weren't important to Billie. Instead, Billie 
came out with fists swinging and attempted to...demonize and 
discredit the author!










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj


I was already aware of this. I don't believe she is referring to Oppenheimer but probably Aurobindo.I'll try to remember to ask her if I talk to her soon.I think what Meera would say that would be the problem is what occurs when statements such as 'the atomic bomb was already known by "Vedic Science"' and this makes it into the schoolbooks of Indian children, giving them the false nationalistic idea that their ancestors already knew about (or originated the idea of) nuclear fission. The west "stole" the idea.The reason this is of concern is because it is already happening. And it has also already occurred in American schools with radical Afrocentrists teaching fiction as science. Mahesh Varma supports the political parties in India which support teaching this BS in schools.In this light it might be interesting to see what the kids at the MSAE are told. I bet there's some pretty bizarre material.On May 23, 2006, at 12:21 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Why Hindutva Loves "Science"Meera Nanda  Before I read any further, I wanted to make one quick observation:  snip  1. The nuclear bomb tests in 1988 were justified and packaged in    dharmic terms. Hindu ideologues claimed that the bomb was foretold  by Lord Krishna in the Bhagwat Gita when he declared himself to   be "the radiance of a thousand suns, the splendor of the Mighty   One. ..I am become Death."  From the Nuclear Weapon Archive:  "The origin of the name Trinity for [the first nuclear explosion in  history, in 1945] is uncertain. It is commonly thought that Robert  Oppenheimer provided the name, which would seem logical, but even  this is not definitely known. A leading theory is that Oppenhimer did  select it, and that he did so with reference to the divine Hindu  trinity of Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Preserver), and Shiva  (the Destroyer). Oppenheimer had an avid interest in Sanskrit  literature (which he had taught himself to read), and following the  Trinity test is reported to have recited [this] passage from the  Bhagavad-Gita...  "If the radiance of a thousand suns Were to burst at once into the sky, That would be like the splendor of the Mighty One... I am become Death, The shatterer of Worlds."  http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Trinity.html  Perhaps if Prof. Nanda ever revises her essay, she might want to include a note that the Gita reference wasn't  original with the "Hindu ideologues"; they were echoing the widely publicized comment of the prominent Western scientist known as the "father of the atomic bomb."  (Oppenheimer himself said, however, that he'd gotten the  name "Trinity" from the poetry of John Donne rather  than from Hindu theology, a fact not mentioned in the archive article on Trinity.)  Incidentally, there's a long, fascinating essay on the Web called "The Gita of J. Robert Oppenheimer," by James A. Hijiya:  http://www.aps-pub.com/proceedings/1442/Hijiya.pdf To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Or go to:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'SPONSORED LINKS  Maharishi university of management  Maharishi mahesh yogi  Ramana maharshi YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



OK, Vaj, I've now read both parts of the two-parter you
posted here by Nanda, as well as the additional essay
you just put up.

Your subject heading is misleading in several different
ways.

First, Vedic Creation Science is your term, not
Nanda's. You created it with the intention of
conveying a highly misleading guilt-by-association
between MMY's Vedic Science and Christian Creation
Science.

Second, in neither essay does Nanda debunk even just
plain Vedic science. Her treatment of it is extremely
superficial and essentially polemical, not analytical.
(As I noted elsewhere, she is said to go into more
detail in part 2 of her book Prophets Facing Backward,
but one certainly finds no debunking in the essays.)

Third, although she mentions TM and MMY in passing, she is
clearly not familiar with MMY's Vedic Science (she refers
to it as his Unified Science, apparently conflating
Unified Field and Vedic Science). She also refers to 
Transcendental Meditation as if it were an integral part of
the Hindutva version of Vedic science, which is of course
not the case at all.

What she's actually debunking has very little to do with
Maharishi's Vedic Science. It's of interest to observers
of the Indian political scene, and to political-type
trends in the philosophy of science, but it has only the
most remote and fuzzy connection to anything TM-ish.

If I had been the one to post her essays here, I would
have noted this up front, so as not to misrepresent her
work or mislead readers into thinking MMY's Vedic Science
had been conclusively debunked by Nanda.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a 
 Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global warming. 
Putting 
 aside what you or I may feel about the issue, the facts or the 
 arguments of the piece weren't important to Billie. Instead,
 Billie came out with fists swinging and attempted to...demonize and 
 discredit the author!

Whoops, there goes Shemp, lying a blue streak again.
(He means Michael Crichton, by the way.)

As you know, Shemp, it wasn't you who posted the
Crichton commentary on alt.m.t; it was someone calling
himself astakinch.

And as you also know, you have willfully and *grossly*
mischaracterized my response to the article.

Nowhere did I demonize Crichton; and as to
discrediting him, I merely corrected your misconception
that Crichton was a scientist, something *you* brought
up in an attempt to claim credibility for Crichton's
piece.

Plus which, being a lot more interested than you were in
the facts and arguments, I went looking on the Web for
what *real* scientists thought of Crichton's thesis, and
found a pantload of debunking from practicing
climatologists. I posted some URLs, which you, of course,
never bothered to look at.

The thread was titled Aliens Cause Global Warming,
and it took place in January 2005, if anyone is 
interested in verifying any of this.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I was already aware of this.

But apparently Nanda was not.

 I don't believe she is referring to Oppenheimer but probably
 Aurobindo.

Where on *earth* did you get the idea I thought she was
referring to Oppenheimer?

The whole point of my post was that she was *not*
referring to Oppenheimer but was citing Hindu ideologues
as referring to the Gita as if the notion were original
with them, when in fact Oppenheimer had made the same
connection with nuclear weapons half a century earlier.

 I'll try to remember to ask her if I talk to her soon.

No, there's nothing to ask her about. Just explain to
her that Oppenheimer was there first with the Gita quote,
and because his is such a well-known remark, her failure
to mention it in this context is rather striking.

 I think what Meera would say that would be the problem is what 
 occurs when statements such as 'the atomic bomb was already known 
 by Vedic Science' and this makes it into the schoolbooks of 
 Indian children, giving them the false nationalistic idea that 
 their ancestors already knew about (or originated the idea of) 
 nuclear fission. The west stole the idea.

Of course that's what she's saying. My post was just a
by the way observation with regard to Oppenheimer's
reference to the Gita (regardless of whether he viewed
the quote as evidence that the ancient Indians knew about
nuclear fission, which I doubt he did).










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Lordi rules!

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



http://www.esctoday.com/news/read/6205?PHPSESSID=34c










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj




On May 23, 2006, at 12:53 PM, authfriend wrote:

 OK, Vaj, I've now read both parts of the two-parter you
 posted here by Nanda, as well as the additional essay
 you just put up.

 Your subject heading is misleading in several different
 ways.

 First, Vedic Creation Science is your term, not
 Nanda's. You created it with the intention of
 conveying a highly misleading guilt-by-association
 between MMY's Vedic Science and Christian Creation
 Science.

 Second, in neither essay does Nanda debunk even just
 plain Vedic science. Her treatment of it is extremely
 superficial and essentially polemical, not analytical.
 (As I noted elsewhere, she is said to go into more
 detail in part 2 of her book Prophets Facing Backward,
 but one certainly finds no debunking in the essays.)

 Third, although she mentions TM and MMY in passing, she is
 clearly not familiar with MMY's Vedic Science (she refers
 to it as his Unified Science, apparently conflating
 Unified Field and Vedic Science). She also refers to
 Transcendental Meditation as if it were an integral part of
 the Hindutva version of Vedic science, which is of course
 not the case at all.

 What she's actually debunking has very little to do with
 Maharishi's Vedic Science. It's of interest to observers
 of the Indian political scene, and to political-type
 trends in the philosophy of science, but it has only the
 most remote and fuzzy connection to anything TM-ish.

 If I had been the one to post her essays here, I would
 have noted this up front, so as not to misrepresent her
 work or mislead readers into thinking MMY's Vedic Science
 had been conclusively debunked by Nanda.

It's probably either that you lack the necessary insight to see the 
connection or you're still stuck inside the TM Vedic paradigm (or 
both). Suffice to say, since this first appeared on a Sanskrit 
scholarly list, I've shared it with a number of TMer's and they (for 
the most part) got it without having to have me spell it out for 
them. Others have even commented on the political machinations behind 
it. Mahesh is a key figure in this revisionist Vedic Creationism.

It's not a problem, I understand you either can't or do not want to 
see this this! If you still haven't got it (obviously the case) 
there's nothing anything else to say.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_...

2006-05-23 Thread jyouells2000



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 In a message dated 5/22/06 7:13:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 What's the traditional way? Mixing the spices clockwise instead 
 of counter-clockwise?
 
 Or perhaps its how I saw TrigunaJi's teenage apprentice mix the 
 concoctions that I bought at his outdoor clinic in Dehli: lay down 
 a bunch of squares cut from the Times of India newspaper, take jars 
 of dirt (or whatever it is he put in his mixtures) and spill them 
 out over the newspaper squares, and then fold up the pieces of 
 newspaper into little packets (which I was then told to take with a 
 glass of water each day).
 
 
 
 
 The key here is, if your taking herbs for depression, those
squares of news 
 paper must be the funnies.

LOL! Great line! and so appropriate.

JohnY









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 snip
  I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a 
  Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global warming. 
 Putting 
  aside what you or I may feel about the issue, the facts or the 
  arguments of the piece weren't important to Billie. Instead,
  Billie came out with fists swinging and attempted to...demonize and 
  discredit the author!
 
 Whoops, there goes Shemp, lying a blue streak again.

BTW, I predict that if Barry responds, he'll remember
the discussion exactly the way Shemp does.

Folie a deux, anyone?











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On May 23, 2006, at 12:53 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  OK, Vaj, I've now read both parts of the two-parter you
  posted here by Nanda, as well as the additional essay
  you just put up.
 
  Your subject heading is misleading in several different
  ways.
 
  First, Vedic Creation Science is your term, not
  Nanda's. You created it with the intention of
  conveying a highly misleading guilt-by-association
  between MMY's Vedic Science and Christian Creation
  Science.
 
  Second, in neither essay does Nanda debunk even just
  plain Vedic science. Her treatment of it is extremely
  superficial and essentially polemical, not analytical.
  (As I noted elsewhere, she is said to go into more
  detail in part 2 of her book Prophets Facing Backward,
  but one certainly finds no debunking in the essays.)
 
  Third, although she mentions TM and MMY in passing, she is
  clearly not familiar with MMY's Vedic Science (she refers
  to it as his Unified Science, apparently conflating
  Unified Field and Vedic Science). She also refers to
  Transcendental Meditation as if it were an integral part of
  the Hindutva version of Vedic science, which is of course
  not the case at all.
 
  What she's actually debunking has very little to do with
  Maharishi's Vedic Science. It's of interest to observers
  of the Indian political scene, and to political-type
  trends in the philosophy of science, but it has only the
  most remote and fuzzy connection to anything TM-ish.
 
  If I had been the one to post her essays here, I would
  have noted this up front, so as not to misrepresent her
  work or mislead readers into thinking MMY's Vedic Science
  had been conclusively debunked by Nanda.
 
 It's probably either that you lack the necessary insight to see
 the connection or you're still stuck inside the TM Vedic paradigm 
 (or both).

More Jell-o, what you always ooze when you can't
actually address the point.

 Suffice to say, since this first appeared on a Sanskrit 
 scholarly list, I've shared it with a number of TMer's and they 
 (for the most part) got it without having to have me spell it out 
 for them. Others have even commented on the political machinations 
 behind it. Mahesh is a key figure in this revisionist Vedic 
 Creationism.

Perhaps you could point to something Maharishi has
said that could be characterized as Vedic Creationism.
According to Nanda, Vedic creationism proposes to
replace Darwinian evolution with devolution from the
original one-ness with Brahman. Where has MMY proposed
that Darwinian evolution should be replaced by this
devolution?

The political machinations of Hindutva are one thing;
the validity of MMY's Vedic Science (i.e., Hagelin's
theories as informed by MMY's teaching) on its own
terms is something else entirely.

My point is that Nanda's polemic, at least what you've
posted, is concerned with the former, not the latter.
I'm only peripherally interested in the former, whereas
I'm actively interested in the latter. I would be most
eager to read a debunking of MMY's Vedic Science by
someone who was expert in both the Vedas and Western
science, but as I've noted, such people are few and
far between, and Nanda is clearly not one of them.

 It's not a problem, I understand you either can't or do not want 
 to see this this! If you still haven't got it (obviously the case) 
 there's nothing anything else to say.

You're tilting at a straw man, Vaj. Why do you have
such trouble addressing the issues I've raised?

(Have you ever noticed that your syntax and spelling
disintegrate whenever you're challenged?)










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj




On May 23, 2006, at 1:39 PM, authfriend wrote:

 -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I was already aware of this.

 But apparently Nanda was not.


I cannot say if she was or she was not. I would however be surprised 
if she was not already aware of Oppenheimer's love of Sanskrit 
literature -- it is fairly well known.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_Marts good news

2006-05-23 Thread shempmcgurk



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ 
wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@ 
   wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WLeed3@ wrote:
 
  reduces the price making it available 4 more of us to 
buy  
   more of 
 it as 
  well that whole milk  @ Wal-mart great news for many 
of us. 
   now 
 if Wal- mart 
  could sell Maharishi Ayer Vedic products as well.
 
 
 The problem there is that Wal-Mart actively negotiates 
their 
   costs 
 with suppliers DOWN every year. As I understand it, Wal-
Mart 
   attempts 
 to get their suppliers to bring their prices on supplies 
to them 
   down 
 by about 5% every year, which they then pass on to 
consumers. 
   Many 
 economists have said that Wal-Mart's policy in this area 
is 
   almost 
 singularly responsible for the very low inflation rate in 
the 
   USA over 
 the past 15 years.
  snip
  +++ Does this look like Wall-Mart is denying the right of the 
middle
  class to exist? N.
 
 +++ Also, importing mass quantities of landfill from China 
produced by
 underpaid or slave labor to compete with local companies is BS.



Underpaid by American standards; overpaid by Chinese standards.

Slave labor: such a comment is an insult to the whole history of 
slavery, demeans it and should not be dignified by a response.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Rick Archer



on 5/23/06 11:20 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On May 23, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
 
 I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and he was
 saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how liberating it is to
 realize
 that. It's like a small segment of a wide spectrum. Other segments,
 even
 contradictory and paradoxical ones, are equally valid. So its true
 that if
 we take our thoughts too seriously, we're addicted - we're locked
 in or
 trapped by a narrow perspective, unrepresentative of Reality.
 
 
 That's interesting because essentially what it points out, from an
 experiential point of view, is that Tolle has not reached self-
 liberation of thought. In others words, he ain't very realized.

Seems to me you're too quick to judge someone's level of realization based
on some quote, or someone's recollection of a quote. Maybe you have this
capability, but I can only vaguely approximate. I prefer to go with what's
inspiring and uplifting, and not make unprovable assumptions about the
speaker's level of consciousness.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On May 23, 2006, at 1:39 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
   I was already aware of this.
 
  But apparently Nanda was not.
 
 I cannot say if she was or she was not. I would however be surprised 
 if she was not already aware of Oppenheimer's love of Sanskrit 
 literature -- it is fairly well known.

Then it's odd she didn't mention that he was the first
to quote that Gita verse in connection with nuclear
weapons, since that is even more widely known than
that he was a fan of Sanskrit literature.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj




On May 23, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Rick Archer wrote:

 on 5/23/06 11:20 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  On May 23, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
 
  I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and 
 he was
  saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how liberating it is to
  realize
  that. It's like a small segment of a wide spectrum. Other segments,
  even
  contradictory and paradoxical ones, are equally valid. So its true
  that if
  we take our thoughts too seriously, we're addicted - we're locked
  in or
  trapped by a narrow perspective, unrepresentative of Reality.
 
 
  That's interesting because essentially what it points out, from an
  experiential point of view, is that Tolle has not reached self-
  liberation of thought. In others words, he ain't very realized.

 Seems to me you're too quick to judge someone's level of 
 realization based
 on some quote, or someone's recollection of a quote. Maybe you have 
 this
 capability, but I can only vaguely approximate. I prefer to go with 
 what's
 inspiring and uplifting, and not make unprovable assumptions about the
 speaker's level of consciousness.

Please share a more direct quote then if you can.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Well, sato bandhum asati?

2006-05-23 Thread cardemaister




sato bandhum asati nir avindan
hRdi pratiiSyaa kavayo maniiSaa.

(pada-paaTha:
sataH; bandhum; asati; niH; avindan;
hRdi; prati 'iSya; kavayaH; maniiSaa.)

Macdonell's translation:

Sages (kavayaH) seeking (pratiiSya)
in /their/ hearts (hRdi) with wisdom
(maniiSaa) found out (nir avindan)
the bond (bandhum) of the existent
(sataH) in the non-existent (asati).

-- Rgveda X 129 (Hymn of Creation) , 4cd 









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Vote in Russ Feingold's Pick an Iowa Patriot

2006-05-23 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Vote in Russ Feingold's Pick an Iowa Patriot





I just voted for Fairfield's own Becky Schmitz in Sen. Russ Feingold's Pick an Iowa Patriot! He's asking for the grassroots to decide which Iowa congressional candidate will get a $5,000 contribution from the Progressive Patriots Fund. Please go to http://www.progressivepatriotsfund.com/vote to cast your vote. Becky deserves it!

Thanks!






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Rick Archer



on 5/23/06 2:11 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 That's interesting because essentially what it points out, from an
 experiential point of view, is that Tolle has not reached self-
 liberation of thought. In others words, he ain't very realized.
 
 Seems to me you're too quick to judge someone's level of
 realization based
 on some quote, or someone's recollection of a quote. Maybe you have
 this
 capability, but I can only vaguely approximate. I prefer to go with
 what's
 inspiring and uplifting, and not make unprovable assumptions about the
 speaker's level of consciousness.
 
 Please share a more direct quote then if you can.

So you mean I could provide you with a list of quotes by various spiritual
teachers and you'd be able to pretty much nail their levels of
consciousness?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Judy Stein, FFL's very own Billie Batts

2006-05-23 Thread shempmcgurk



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  So that is my new nickname for Judy: Billie Batts. 
  My concession to her is that I have feminized Billy 
  to Billie.
 
 Seems an unnecessary concession to someone who seems
 intent on proving her dick is longer than anyone else's. :-)



Women who insist upon having the same options as men would do well to 
consider the option of being the strong, silent type.

-- Fran Lebowitz










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Hix nix stix blissniks

2006-05-23 Thread bob_brigante



http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-05-22-smith-center_x.htm










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Everyone wants a MacBook

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



I missed the fine print the first time around when I clicked on the URL. The new Apple 
Computer 24/7 store was giving away a MacBook laptop every hour when it first opened. It's 
still an interesting study in marketing though...

http://www.apple.com/retail/fifthavenue/










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Donovan to do TM tour of Scorpionland universities

2006-05-23 Thread bob_brigante



http://www.globalgoodnews.com/education-news-a.html?art=114832553196049









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
  requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
 
 She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd certainly 
 say she does. esp. given her masterful overview of the development of 
 this trend. Really the only thing necessary is the minimum insight 
 necessary to expose the fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to 
 authority and using faulty logic.


There's a guy who used to lecture at MUM/MIU who has a PhD in Indian Studies (I believe) 
who did his PhD work pointing out the cultural origins of the TM movement. His PhD 
thesis is much better documented and researched examination of a specific example of 
what she discusses. Can't remember his name, but his thesis was online last I checked. If 
you want, I'll track him down. Anyone know who I'm talking about?











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_Marts good news

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WLeed3@ wrote:

 reduces the price making it available 4 more of us to buy  
  more of 
it as 
 well that whole milk  @ Wal-mart great news for many of us. 
  now 
if Wal- mart 
 could sell Maharishi Ayer Vedic products as well.


The problem there is that Wal-Mart actively negotiates their 
  costs 
with suppliers DOWN every year. As I understand it, Wal-Mart 
  attempts 
to get their suppliers to bring their prices on supplies to them 
  down 
by about 5% every year, which they then pass on to consumers. 
  Many 
economists have said that Wal-Mart's policy in this area is 
  almost 
singularly responsible for the very low inflation rate in the 
  USA over 
the past 15 years.
 snip
 +++ Does this look like Wall-Mart is denying the right of the middle
 class to exist? N.


To paraphrase Demolition Man: after the Big Box Wars, every store was Wal-Mart...













To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
  
   The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
   requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
  
  She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd 
  certainly say she does. esp. given her masterful overview 
  of the development of this trend. Really the only thing 
  necessary is the minimum insight necessary to expose the 
  fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to authority and 
  using faulty logic.
 
 Not to mention killing the messenger. There is a 
 great deal of resistance on the part of members of
 Indian-based spiritual groups to equating the 
 Vedic Science movement with Christian Fundament-
 alism, but I think that not only is it a valid
 parallel, it's something that seekers should be
 more aware of. Far too many of them just accept
 what they've been told about the Vedas and Indian
 history (much of it myth) as gospel truth, when
 it just might not be. 
 
 But isn't it fascinating that when this issue
 comes up, the first post reacting to it on FFL 
 is an attempt to demonize and discredit the 
 author? Typical.


Insomuch as humans show the same patterns of behavior in every society, the analogy 
with Christian Fundamentalism may be useful. However, since Hinduism is usually a far 
more flexable and accomidating religion or set-of-religions than Christianity traditionally 
has been (for instance, there's no Nicene Creed test for Hindus as far as I know), the 
analogy can only go so far.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Peter





--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 on 5/23/06 2:11 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  
  That's interesting because essentially what it
 points out, from an
  experiential point of view, is that Tolle has
 not reached self-
  liberation of thought. In others words, he ain't
 very realized.
  
  Seems to me you're too quick to judge someone's
 level of
  realization based
  on some quote, or someone's recollection of a
 quote. Maybe you have
  this
  capability, but I can only vaguely approximate. I
 prefer to go with
  what's
  inspiring and uplifting, and not make unprovable
 assumptions about the
  speaker's level of consciousness.
  
  Please share a more direct quote then if you can.
 
 So you mean I could provide you with a list of
 quotes by various spiritual
 teachers and you'd be able to pretty much nail their
 levels of
 consciousness?

The above quote indicates that Rick is firmly
established in GC with glimpses of UC arising in
awareness usually in the late afternoon.


 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ~-- 
 Home is just a click away. Make Yahoo! your home
 page now.

http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM

~-
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
   On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
  
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
  
   She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd
   certainly say she does. esp. given her masterful overview
   of the development of this trend. Really the only thing
   necessary is the minimum insight necessary to expose the
   fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to authority and
   using faulty logic.
 
  Not to mention killing the messenger.
 
 And that killing of the messenger in this specific context is an 
 artifact of clinging to the idea that the vedas and science go hand- 
 in-hand.
 
 We all grew up in a technological age and so it's a very compelling 
 idea, but not necessaily the truth of the matter. It could be we just 
 bought into the commercial and the advertisement that is part and 
 parcel of the TM PR machine. Once one recognizes they made this 
 error, they do understand why that occurred and also notice why 
 others would do the same or why it's a comfortable blanket to hold 
 onto. But basically it's just spin to play with our own attachment to 
 science as a belief system.

To some extent, yes. MMY specifically wanted to make TM acceptable in the West, so he 
was interested in scientific research on it from the very start (see _Hermit in My House_/?
Maharishi at 433_ for an example of this in 1959).

However, MMY obviously, to me, honestly believes that Western Science WILL substantiate 
the Vedic world-view. Of course, one can claim that he's twisted the Vedic world-view to 
accomidate science, but given the old saying that there are as many valid interpretations 
of the Veda as there are enlightened people, this may not mean anything to the Vedic 
believers.

 
  There is a
  great deal of resistance on the part of members of
  Indian-based spiritual groups to equating the
  Vedic Science movement with Christian Fundament-
  alism, but I think that not only is it a valid
  parallel, it's something that seekers should be
  more aware of. Far too many of them just accept
  what they've been told about the Vedas and Indian
  history (much of it myth) as gospel truth, when
  it just might not be.
 
 What throws people off is that Indian spiritual thought represents 
 the *left* of American (and western) thought and lifestyle-- 
 fundamentalism, generally, the *right*. But in India, the movements 
 which seek to try to make the vedas scientific are fundamentalist, 
 right-wing nationalists. They're like our religious right, our 
 moral majority.


Sure, the brahman caste definitely has been a supporter behind the scenes of the TMO, at 
least in the South, or so I recall from the PhD thesis I read ages ago (still can't remember 
the guy's name).

 
 
 
  But isn't it fascinating that when this issue
  comes up, the first post reacting to it on FFL
  is an attempt to demonize and discredit the
  author? Typical.
 
 Yes, I'm not surprised because at one time I would've done the same 
 thing.


It may or may not have been a knee-jerk reaction on Judy's part, but its a valid question: 
just how qualified is the author to make the observations. A lay-person criticizing the 
Roman Catholic Church can bring a lay perspective to the issue, but unless she's devoted a 
great deal of time to researching the internal politics and activities of the Church, her 
perspective is STILL mostly that of an outsider. 

Anthropologists acknowledge that insider and outsider perspectives are both valid, when 
reporting on cultural phenomena and that there is a tradeoff when one assimilates into the 
culture to report on it, rather than maintaining a distance as an outsider.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 TorquiseB writes snipped:
 Just following up because I think it's an interesting
 subject, I think that the key to the above point of 
 view is in the last sentence. That is, one tends to 
 view the world in terms of one's own experience. The
 author in question had problems with addiction; there-
 fore she sees 98% of the people around her as having
 had problems with addiction, a point of view that is
 so obviously distorted it barely deserves comment.
 
 Tom T:
 You might tend to disagree if you haven't recognized that any belief
 is an addiction. How do I know that to be true. Try and lose or change
 core beliefs. Mull it over a little and thanks for your comments. As
 you have said before it is sometimes good to agree to disagree.Tom


I wouldn't call any arbitrary belief an addiction, but more along the lines of a rut. It's more 
comfortable to let your wheels follow the ruts in the road, rather than try to make a turn 
when you need to.

Of course, if TM works as advertised, turning may become easier, but apparently many 
here don't believe that TM works as advertised.













To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  
  On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 snip
   Not to mention killing the messenger.
  
  And that killing of the messenger in this specific context is an 
  artifact of clinging to the idea that the vedas and science go
  hand-in-hand.
 
 Or, it's an artifact of being genuinely interested in
 the degree of validity of various projects aimed at
 integrating or reconciling science and spirituality.

One comment: Maharishi's Vedic Science isn't scientific in the modern sense of the word, 
but only in the sense that it is a systematic exploration of knowledge. Modern Science 
requires a certain concensus of practitioners based on objective/external observation, 
whereas Vedic Science is strictly personal and subjective/internal. There are overlaps in 
the field of practice and study (e.g. TM practice leading to lower blood pressure, etc), but 
they are two distinctly different kinds of science.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  
  On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
  
   The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
   requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
  
  She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd certainly 
  say she does.
 
 Being raised in the culture doesn't automatically
 give one expertise in Vedic science, which requires
 a thorough understanding of the Vedic literature.
 
 Nor does being a scientist, of course, give one
 such expertise.
 

More specifically, being a practicing scientist doesn't give one a broad understanding of 
Science.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 5/23/06 9:09 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Life 'downloads' all sorts of stuff in our direction.
  But we don't have to open a port to it. And if we
  already have, at some point in our lives, all we
  have to do is open another port and let it flow right
  out again, without a lot of diggin' in the dirt. Just
  my opinion...
 
 Principle of the second element: turn on the light to remove the darkness.
 Tom and Mark are pointing out that the lives of those in FF who have been
 meditating for decades suggest that this approach alone is inadequate. Maybe
 a little digging is in order. Not mud-wallowing, but some compassionate,
 honest examination of things which we might prefer to keep buried.


MMY provides that digging in the form of new and ever more grand projects that people 
can choose to participate in. From the physiological perspective, this provides new 
activities to test and stabilize one's establishment in Being, which, in MMY's eyes, is all 
that is needed to establish CC (that and regular TM practice of course).


People who choose to ignore these projects in favor of having a life may be showing their 
growth in their own way, but people who avoid participating in the projects while 
denouncing them show a certain level of addiction, I think.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@ 
 wrote:
 
  I think the basic idea is, take everything lightly; don't 
  take yourself too seriously. Sound like good advice?
 
 And above all, laugh like crazy at anyone who 
 demands to be taken seriously. If more people
 did that, the world wouldn't be in the mess
 it's in...


Everyone wants to be taken seriously. Even stand-up comedians want to be taken seriously 
--their antics are meant to be laughed at and if instead, they are mocked for being 
incompetent comedians, they would be as shattered as anyone else would be.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread bob_brigante



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
   
   On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  snip
Not to mention killing the messenger.
   
   And that killing of the messenger in this specific context 
is an 
   artifact of clinging to the idea that the vedas and science 
go
   hand-in-hand.
  
  Or, it's an artifact of being genuinely interested in
  the degree of validity of various projects aimed at
  integrating or reconciling science and spirituality.
 


 One comment: Maharishi's Vedic Science isn't scientific in the 
modern sense of the word, 
 but only in the sense that it is a systematic exploration of 
knowledge. Modern Science 
 requires a certain concensus of practitioners based on 
objective/external observation, 
 whereas Vedic Science is strictly personal and 
subjective/internal. There are overlaps in 
 the field of practice and study (e.g. TM practice leading to 
lower blood pressure, etc), but 
 they are two distinctly different kinds of science.



*

The word science comes the Latin scire, to know, and consciousness 
is obviously the basis of all knowing. By using the technology of TM 
to expand the ability to know, Vedic science is the basis of all 
science, whether it uses a piece of Western-science machinery or 
uses the machinery of the nervous system and Vedic technology.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On May 23, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
 
  I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and he was
  saying that any thought is a viewpoint, and how liberating it is to 
  realize
  that. It's like a small segment of a wide spectrum. Other segments, 
  even
  contradictory and paradoxical ones, are equally valid. So its true 
  that if
  we take our thoughts too seriously, we're addicted - we're locked 
  in or
  trapped by a narrow perspective, unrepresentative of Reality.
 
 
 That's interesting because essentially what it points out, from an 
 experiential point of view, is that Tolle has not reached self- 
 liberation of thought. In others words, he ain't very realized.
 
 He sure has the spiel down though.


Perhaps. In my opinion, MMY has the spiel down. So did Krishnamurti. People who talk 
about how liberating it is to have a certain understanding about something don't sound 
like they get it at all.













To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread jim_flanegin



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 
 --- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  on 5/23/06 2:11 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
   
   That's interesting because essentially what it
  points out, from an
   experiential point of view, is that Tolle has
  not reached self-
   liberation of thought. In others words, he ain't
  very realized.
   
   Seems to me you're too quick to judge someone's
  level of
   realization based
   on some quote, or someone's recollection of a
  quote. Maybe you have
   this
   capability, but I can only vaguely approximate. I
  prefer to go with
   what's
   inspiring and uplifting, and not make unprovable
  assumptions about the
   speaker's level of consciousness.
   
   Please share a more direct quote then if you can.
  
  So you mean I could provide you with a list of
  quotes by various spiritual
  teachers and you'd be able to pretty much nail their
  levels of
  consciousness?
 
 The above quote indicates that Rick is firmly
 established in GC with glimpses of UC arising in
 awareness usually in the late afternoon.
 

Your astute observation correlates with latent Brahman, blended 
evenly with adequate soma, percolated thoroughly with TC, with a mad 
dash of Vishnu, often mistaken for a flavor of Krishna. Congrats!! 









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
   On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
   
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
   
   She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd 
   certainly say she does. esp. given her masterful overview 
   of the development of this trend. Really the only thing 
   necessary is the minimum insight necessary to expose the 
   fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing to authority and 
   using faulty logic.
  
  Not to mention killing the messenger. There is a 
  great deal of resistance on the part of members of
  Indian-based spiritual groups to equating the 
  Vedic Science movement with Christian Fundament-
  alism, but I think that not only is it a valid
  parallel, it's something that seekers should be
  more aware of. Far too many of them just accept
  what they've been told about the Vedas and Indian
  history (much of it myth) as gospel truth, when
  it just might not be. 
  
  But isn't it fascinating that when this issue
  comes up, the first post reacting to it on FFL 
  is an attempt to demonize and discredit the 
  author? Typical.
 
 
 That's Billie's M.O.
 
 I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a 
 Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global warming. Putting 
 aside what you or I may feel about the issue, the facts or the 
 arguments of the piece weren't important to Billie. Instead, Billie 
 came out with fists swinging and attempted to...demonize and 
 discredit the author!


Chricton isn't a scientist, but trained as an MD (apparently never had a practice after 
medical school) and science fiction writer:


http://www.crichton-official.com/aboutmc/biography.html










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I was already aware of this.
 
 I don't believe she is referring to Oppenheimer but probably Aurobindo.
 
 I'll try to remember to ask her if I talk to her soon.
 
 I think what Meera would say that would be the problem is what occurs 
 when statements such as 'the atomic bomb was already known by Vedic 
 Science' and this makes it into the schoolbooks of Indian children, 
 giving them the false nationalistic idea that their ancestors already 
 knew about (or originated the idea of) nuclear fission. The west 
 stole the idea.
 
 The reason this is of concern is because it is already happening. And 
 it has also already occurred in American schools with radical 
 Afrocentrists teaching fiction as science. Mahesh Varma supports the 
 political parties in India which support teaching this BS in schools.
 
 In this light it might be interesting to see what the kids at the 
 MSAE are told. I bet there's some pretty bizarre material.

Perhaps. The claim that the Vedas contain all knowledge can be interpreted many ways, 
however.


 










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  snip
   I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a 
   Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global warming. 
  Putting 
   aside what you or I may feel about the issue, the facts or the 
   arguments of the piece weren't important to Billie. Instead,
   Billie came out with fists swinging and attempted to...demonize and 
   discredit the author!
  
  Whoops, there goes Shemp, lying a blue streak again.
 
 BTW, I predict that if Barry responds, he'll remember
 the discussion exactly the way Shemp does.
 
 Folie a deux, anyone?


Barry's not reading your stuff. He has to read a response to you before he responds...











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_Marts good news

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson 
 nelsonriddle2001@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 shempmcgurk@
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ 
 wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 shempmcgurk@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WLeed3@ wrote:
  
   reduces the price making it available 4 more of us to 
 buy  
more of 
  it as 
   well that whole milk  @ Wal-mart great news for many 
 of us. 
now 
  if Wal- mart 
   could sell Maharishi Ayer Vedic products as well.
  
  
  The problem there is that Wal-Mart actively negotiates 
 their 
costs 
  with suppliers DOWN every year. As I understand it, Wal-
 Mart 
attempts 
  to get their suppliers to bring their prices on supplies 
 to them 
down 
  by about 5% every year, which they then pass on to 
 consumers. 
Many 
  economists have said that Wal-Mart's policy in this area 
 is 
almost 
  singularly responsible for the very low inflation rate in 
 the 
USA over 
  the past 15 years.
   snip
   +++ Does this look like Wall-Mart is denying the right of the 
 middle
   class to exist? N.
  
  +++ Also, importing mass quantities of landfill from China 
 produced by
  underpaid or slave labor to compete with local companies is BS.
 
 
 
 Underpaid by American standards; overpaid by Chinese standards.
 
 Slave labor: such a comment is an insult to the whole history of 
 slavery, demeans it and should not be dignified by a response.


Depends. Are sex workers who fear for their lives if they leave their pimps slaves? 










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread jim_flanegin



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 The origin of the name Trinity for [the first nuclear explosion in 
 history, in 1945] is uncertain. It is commonly thought that Robert 
 Oppenheimer provided the name, which would seem logical, but even 
 this is not definitely known. A leading theory is that Oppenhimer 
did 
 select it, and that he did so with reference to the divine Hindu 
 trinity of Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Preserver), and Shiva 
 (the Destroyer). Oppenheimer had an avid interest in Sanskrit 
 literature (which he had taught himself to read), and following 
the 
 Trinity test is reported to have recited [this] passage from the 
 Bhagavad-Gita...
 
 If the radiance of a thousand suns
 Were to burst at once into the sky,
 That would be like the splendor of the Mighty One...
 I am become Death,
 The shatterer of Worlds.
 
imo, Oppenheimer was a f*cking moron playing God.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread jim_flanegin



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@ 
wrote:
 
  on 5/23/06 9:09 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Life 'downloads' all sorts of stuff in our direction.
   But we don't have to open a port to it. And if we
   already have, at some point in our lives, all we
   have to do is open another port and let it flow right
   out again, without a lot of diggin' in the dirt. Just
   my opinion...
  
  Principle of the second element: turn on the light to remove the 
darkness.
  Tom and Mark are pointing out that the lives of those in FF who 
have been
  meditating for decades suggest that this approach alone is 
inadequate. Maybe
  a little digging is in order. Not mud-wallowing, but some 
compassionate,
  honest examination of things which we might prefer to keep 
buried.
 
 
 MMY provides that digging in the form of new and ever more grand 
projects that people 
 can choose to participate in. From the physiological perspective, 
this provides new 
 activities to test and stabilize one's establishment in Being, 
which, in MMY's eyes, is all 
 that is needed to establish CC (that and regular TM practice of 
course).
 
 
 People who choose to ignore these projects in favor of having a 
life may be showing their 
 growth in their own way, but people who avoid participating in the 
projects while 
 denouncing them show a certain level of addiction, I think.

Agreed.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  
  On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
  
   The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
   requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
  
  She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd 
certainly 
  say she does. esp. given her masterful overview of the 
development of 
  this trend. Really the only thing necessary is the minimum 
insight 
  necessary to expose the fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing 
to 
  authority and using faulty logic.
 
 
 There's a guy who used to lecture at MUM/MIU who has a PhD in 
Indian Studies (I believe) 
 who did his PhD work pointing out the cultural origins of the TM 
movement. His PhD 
 thesis is much better documented and researched examination of a 
specific example of 
 what she discusses. Can't remember his name, but his thesis was 
online last I checked. If 
 you want, I'll track him down. Anyone know who I'm talking about?

Would you mean Jay Randolph Coplin, by any chance?

Part of his PhD dissertation on TM's origins is on
the Web, here:

http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/drcoplin/

Unfortunately, the meatier-looking parts aren't up.
But the parts that are, are pretty interesting.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
   
   On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  snip
Not to mention killing the messenger.
   
   And that killing of the messenger in this specific context is 
an 
   artifact of clinging to the idea that the vedas and science go
   hand-in-hand.
  
  Or, it's an artifact of being genuinely interested in
  the degree of validity of various projects aimed at
  integrating or reconciling science and spirituality.
 
 One comment: Maharishi's Vedic Science isn't scientific in the 
modern sense of the word, 
 but only in the sense that it is a systematic exploration of 
knowledge. Modern Science 
 requires a certain concensus of practitioners based on 
objective/external observation, 
 whereas Vedic Science is strictly personal and subjective/internal. 
There are overlaps in 
 the field of practice and study (e.g. TM practice leading to lower 
blood pressure, etc), but 
 they are two distinctly different kinds of science.

Indeed. Nanda seems to conflate the two in a couple
of places in her essays.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
   

On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
   snip
 Not to mention killing the messenger.

And that killing of the messenger in this specific context 
 is an 
artifact of clinging to the idea that the vedas and science 
 go
hand-in-hand.
   
   Or, it's an artifact of being genuinely interested in
   the degree of validity of various projects aimed at
   integrating or reconciling science and spirituality.
  
 
 
  One comment: Maharishi's Vedic Science isn't scientific in the 
 modern sense of the word, 
  but only in the sense that it is a systematic exploration of 
 knowledge. Modern Science 
  requires a certain concensus of practitioners based on 
 objective/external observation, 
  whereas Vedic Science is strictly personal and 
 subjective/internal. There are overlaps in 
  the field of practice and study (e.g. TM practice leading to 
 lower blood pressure, etc), but 
  they are two distinctly different kinds of science.
 
 
 
 *
 
 The word science comes the Latin scire, to know, and consciousness 
 is obviously the basis of all knowing. By using the technology of TM 
 to expand the ability to know, Vedic science is the basis of all 
 science, whether it uses a piece of Western-science machinery or 
 uses the machinery of the nervous system and Vedic technology.


An interesting point, and perhaps valid, but I was talking about the implication that Vedic 
Science was a science in the Western, modern sense that Physics, Chemistry, etc., are.

Western Sciences are procedures and strategies used to explore certain aspects of reality 
that are divided according to how convenient it is to explore them one way than another 
using said procedures and strategies. E.G., Chemistry uses a someone different set than 
Physics, but the common link is the ability for scientists to share data and theories with 
one another and have colleagues test said data and theories via replication or some 
analogous procedure.

While there is an overlap with Vedic Science in that people can use TM to test MMY's 
claims, at least partly, the ability to test the claims isn't open to just anyone --they have to 
have attained a certain state of consciousness to be a Vedic Scientist. That's a different 
kind of training than Western Science requires.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Ooooh, I like this one: awareness of awareness!

2006-05-23 Thread shempmcgurk



It's one of Scientology's Super Powers...see the last paragraph.

--


Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:17 p.m. EDT
Scientologists Ready for 'Super Power'
www.newsmax.com

Scientology is about to unveil a previously secret spiritual 
training program called Super Power that promises to heighten 
participants' powers of perception.

The bizarre program is being prepared for a rollout in a new 
building under construction in Clearwater, Fla.

Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard taught that people have 
57 perceptics that include not only the five senses, but also an 
ability to discern relative sizes, blood circulation, balance, 
compass direction, temperature, gravity and an awareness of 
importance, unimportance, the St. Petersburg Times reports.

Super Power uses machines, apparatus and specially designed rooms to 
exercise these so-called perceptics. Former Scientology members told 
the Times that the machines include an antigravity simulator and a 
gyroscope-like device that spins a person around while blindfolded 
to improve perception of compass direction. A video screen that 
moves forward and backward while flashing images is used to improve 
a person's ability to identify subliminal messages, they said.



Story Continues Below


Hubbard promised that Super Power would improve perceptions and put 
the person into a new realm of ability. 
For years, details of Super Power training have been kept secret 
even from church members, and they haven't been revealed until a 
member paid to take the course.

Church spokesman Ben Shaw would not say how much the program will 
cost, but upper levels of Scientology training can run tens of 
thousands of dollars, according to the Times.

Shaw said 300 staff members are being trained to deliver Super 
Power, which will be ready to go when the new building is completed, 
probably in 2007.

Scientology's 57 perceptics include endocrine states, awareness 
of awareness, cellular and bacterial position, motion of 
self, time track motion and awareness of not knowing.


 
 Senate Okays Social Security Benefits for Illegals! 
 
 New Stock Market Report - Limited Time Offer! 
 Actor Wayne Rogers' Stock Pick Up 353% 
 










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
 The origin of the name Trinity for [the first nuclear explosion in 
  history, in 1945] is uncertain. It is commonly thought that Robert 
  Oppenheimer provided the name, which would seem logical, but even 
  this is not definitely known. A leading theory is that Oppenhimer 
 did 
  select it, and that he did so with reference to the divine Hindu 
  trinity of Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Preserver), and Shiva 
  (the Destroyer). Oppenheimer had an avid interest in Sanskrit 
  literature (which he had taught himself to read), and following 
 the 
  Trinity test is reported to have recited [this] passage from the 
  Bhagavad-Gita...
  
  If the radiance of a thousand suns
  Were to burst at once into the sky,
  That would be like the splendor of the Mighty One...
  I am become Death,
  The shatterer of Worlds.
  
 imo, Oppenheimer was a f*cking moron playing God.


Aren't we all? Oppenheimer just had access to more dangerous toys...









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread jim_flanegin



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
  wrote:
  
  The origin of the name Trinity for [the first nuclear 
explosion in 
   history, in 1945] is uncertain. It is commonly thought that 
Robert 
   Oppenheimer provided the name, which would seem logical, but 
even 
   this is not definitely known. A leading theory is that 
Oppenhimer 
  did 
   select it, and that he did so with reference to the divine 
Hindu 
   trinity of Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Preserver), and 
Shiva 
   (the Destroyer). Oppenheimer had an avid interest in Sanskrit 
   literature (which he had taught himself to read), and 
following 
  the 
   Trinity test is reported to have recited [this] passage from 
the 
   Bhagavad-Gita...
   
   If the radiance of a thousand suns
   Were to burst at once into the sky,
   That would be like the splendor of the Mighty One...
   I am become Death,
   The shatterer of Worlds.
   
  imo, Oppenheimer was a f*cking moron playing God.
 
 
 Aren't we all? Oppenheimer just had access to more dangerous 
toys...

Ha-Ha! The reverse DID occur to me after I wrote this, that as well, 
God was playing a f*cking moron named Oppenheimer. Kinda took the 
sting out of it...

To your point also, Oppenheimer drew these evil weapons to him, and 
that is how he had access to more dangerous toys. 










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
   
   On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
   
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
   
   She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd 
 certainly 
   say she does. esp. given her masterful overview of the 
 development of 
   this trend. Really the only thing necessary is the minimum 
 insight 
   necessary to expose the fraud...otherwise you're merely appealing 
 to 
   authority and using faulty logic.
  
  
  There's a guy who used to lecture at MUM/MIU who has a PhD in 
 Indian Studies (I believe) 
  who did his PhD work pointing out the cultural origins of the TM 
 movement. His PhD 
  thesis is much better documented and researched examination of a 
 specific example of 
  what she discusses. Can't remember his name, but his thesis was 
 online last I checked. If 
  you want, I'll track him down. Anyone know who I'm talking about?
 
 Would you mean Jay Randolph Coplin, by any chance?
 
 Part of his PhD dissertation on TM's origins is on
 the Web, here:
 
 http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/drcoplin/
 
 Unfortunately, the meatier-looking parts aren't up.
 But the parts that are, are pretty interesting.


He has a certain non-blissninny style to him:


http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/97/04/962026P.pdf









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
 The origin of the name Trinity for [the first nuclear explosion 
in 
  history, in 1945] is uncertain. It is commonly thought that 
Robert 
  Oppenheimer provided the name, which would seem logical, but even 
  this is not definitely known. A leading theory is that Oppenhimer 
 did 
  select it, and that he did so with reference to the divine Hindu 
  trinity of Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Preserver), and 
Shiva 
  (the Destroyer). Oppenheimer had an avid interest in Sanskrit 
  literature (which he had taught himself to read), and following 
 the 
  Trinity test is reported to have recited [this] passage from the 
  Bhagavad-Gita...
  
  If the radiance of a thousand suns
  Were to burst at once into the sky,
  That would be like the splendor of the Mighty One...
  I am become Death,
  The shatterer of Worlds.
  
 imo, Oppenheimer was a f*cking moron playing God.

Oh, now, that's an intelligent comment, Jim.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fundamentalist or reconstructionist med

2006-05-23 Thread Vaj




On May 23, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Rick Archer wrote:

 on 5/23/06 2:11 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  That's interesting because essentially what it points out, from an
  experiential point of view, is that Tolle has not reached self-
  liberation of thought. In others words, he ain't very realized.
 
  Seems to me you're too quick to judge someone's level of
  realization based
  on some quote, or someone's recollection of a quote. Maybe you have
  this
  capability, but I can only vaguely approximate. I prefer to go with
  what's
  inspiring and uplifting, and not make unprovable assumptions 
 about the
  speaker's level of consciousness.
 
  Please share a more direct quote then if you can.

 So you mean I could provide you with a list of quotes by various 
 spiritual
 teachers and you'd be able to pretty much nail their levels of
 consciousness?


No, of course not.

It had to do with something specific about your quote.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Ooooh, I like this one: awareness of awareness!

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's one of Scientology's Super Powers...see the last paragraph.
 
 --
 
 
 Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:17 p.m. EDT
 Scientologists Ready for 'Super Power'
 www.newsmax.com

[...]
 
 Scientology's 57 perceptics include endocrine states, awareness 
 of awareness, cellular and bacterial position, motion of 
 self, time track motion and awareness of not knowing.
 

One wonders if there is ANY equivalence here with TM.

I used to think that every spiritual tradition was talking about the same thing when they 
used terms like samadhi and satori and so on, but while it may have been the case in the 
distant past, I don't think its true any more.

The physiology that results from various spiritual practices is just too radically different 
even if the terms used are the same.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 shempmcgurk@ 
wrote:
snip
 I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a 
 Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global warming. 
 Putting aside what you or I may feel about the issue, the 
 facts or the arguments of the piece weren't important to 
 Billie. Instead, Billie came out with fists swinging and 
 attempted to...demonize and discredit the author!

Whoops, there goes Shemp, lying a blue streak again.
   
   BTW, I predict that if Barry responds, he'll remember
   the discussion exactly the way Shemp does.
   
   Folie a deux, anyone?
  
  Barry's not reading your stuff. He has to read a response to you 
  before he responds...
 
 Lawson. Why would Barry have to read a post of mine
 to know what's in a post from Shemp?
 
 My point is that he'll back Shemp up, even though he
 knows Shemp's lying, because Shemp is attacking me.


Politics is always interesting to watch...











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
   There's a guy who used to lecture at MUM/MIU who has a PhD in 
   Indian Studies (I believe) who did his PhD work pointing out 
   the cultural origins of the TM movement. His PhD thesis is much 
   better documented and researched examination of a specific 
   example of what she discusses. Can't remember his name, but his 
   thesis was online last I checked. If you want, I'll track him 
   down. Anyone know who I'm talking about?
  
  Would you mean Jay Randolph Coplin, by any chance?
  
  Part of his PhD dissertation on TM's origins is on
  the Web, here:
  
  http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/drcoplin/
  
  Unfortunately, the meatier-looking parts aren't up.
  But the parts that are, are pretty interesting.
 
 He has a certain non-blissninny style to him:
 
 http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/97/04/962026P.pdf

OMG, that's hilarious (at least the first few pages; I
didn't plow through the rest). Have to think the judge
who wrote the decision was amused as well.

Is that the guy you were thinking of?










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Why Hindutva Loves Science

2006-05-23 Thread authfriend



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
   wrote:
   
   The origin of the name Trinity for [the first nuclear 
 explosion in 
history, in 1945] is uncertain. It is commonly thought that 
 Robert 
Oppenheimer provided the name, which would seem logical, but 
 even 
this is not definitely known. A leading theory is that 
 Oppenhimer 
   did 
select it, and that he did so with reference to the divine 
 Hindu 
trinity of Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Preserver), and 
 Shiva 
(the Destroyer). Oppenheimer had an avid interest in Sanskrit 
literature (which he had taught himself to read), and 
 following 
   the 
Trinity test is reported to have recited [this] passage from 
 the 
Bhagavad-Gita...

If the radiance of a thousand suns
Were to burst at once into the sky,
That would be like the splendor of the Mighty One...
I am become Death,
The shatterer of Worlds.

   imo, Oppenheimer was a f*cking moron playing God.
  
  
  Aren't we all? Oppenheimer just had access to more dangerous 
 toys...
 
 Ha-Ha! The reverse DID occur to me after I wrote this, that as 
well, 
 God was playing a f*cking moron named Oppenheimer. Kinda took the 
 sting out of it...
 
 To your point also, Oppenheimer drew these evil weapons to him, and 
 that is how he had access to more dangerous toys.

You might want to have a look at the essay I 
recommended earlier, The Gita of J. Robert
Oppenheimer, for some insight into his thinking:

http://www.aps-pub.com/proceedings/1442/Hijiya.pdf










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Ooooh, I like this one: awareness of awareness!

2006-05-23 Thread shempmcgurk



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
wrote:
 
  It's one of Scientology's Super Powers...see the last paragraph.
  
  --
  
  
  Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:17 p.m. EDT
  Scientologists Ready for 'Super Power'
  www.newsmax.com
 
 [...]
  
  Scientology's 57 perceptics include endocrine 
states, awareness 
  of awareness, cellular and bacterial position, motion of 
  self, time track motion and awareness of not knowing.
  
 
 One wonders if there is ANY equivalence here with TM.
 
 I used to think that every spiritual tradition was talking about 
the same thing when they 
 used terms like samadhi and satori and so on, but while it may 
have been the case in the 
 distant past, I don't think its true any more.
 
 The physiology that results from various spiritual practices is 
just too radically different 
 even if the terms used are the same.



Awareness of awareness can only mean one thing, no?










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_...

2006-05-23 Thread shempmcgurk



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 In a message dated 5/22/06 7:13:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 What's the traditional way? Mixing the spices clockwise 
instead 
 of counter-clockwise?
 
 Or perhaps its how I saw TrigunaJi's teenage apprentice mix the 
 concoctions that I bought at his outdoor clinic in Dehli: lay 
down 
 a bunch of squares cut from the Times of India newspaper, take 
jars 
 of dirt (or whatever it is he put in his mixtures) and spill them 
 out over the newspaper squares, and then fold up the pieces of 
 newspaper into little packets (which I was then told to take with 
a 
 glass of water each day).
 
 
 
 
 The key here is, if your taking herbs for depression, those 
squares of news 
 paper must be the funnies.



Truth is stranger than fiction: a friend of mine was prescribed 
reading the funny papers by TriGunaJi.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_Marts good news

2006-05-23 Thread Nelson



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ 
 wrote:
  +++ Also, importing mass quantities of landfill 
  from China produced by
  underpaid or slave labor to compete with 
  local companies is BS.
 
 You mean sorted recycled plastics? I think that
 they have discovered one of the scientific holy
 grails; depolymerising plastic back to lower
 hydrocarbons. They may end up as the world's
 chief supplier of oil. I wonder if they will hang 
 on to the bulk of their scrap plastic.
 
 Anothe rissue is the 1.5 million people in their
 prisons who are said to be used as slave labour,
 producing goods whiuch must undercut everybody.
 Uns.

+++ This could lead to various fnancial disasters around the world
and, as one writer pointed out, the conflict with China will be in the
financial arena and, we will probably lose.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic Creation Science debunked

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 snip
There's a guy who used to lecture at MUM/MIU who has a PhD in 
Indian Studies (I believe) who did his PhD work pointing out 
the cultural origins of the TM movement. His PhD thesis is much 
better documented and researched examination of a specific 
example of what she discusses. Can't remember his name, but his 
thesis was online last I checked. If you want, I'll track him 
down. Anyone know who I'm talking about?
   
   Would you mean Jay Randolph Coplin, by any chance?
   
   Part of his PhD dissertation on TM's origins is on
   the Web, here:
   
   http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/drcoplin/
   
   Unfortunately, the meatier-looking parts aren't up.
   But the parts that are, are pretty interesting.
  
  He has a certain non-blissninny style to him:
  
  http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/97/04/962026P.pdf
 
 OMG, that's hilarious (at least the first few pages; I
 didn't plow through the rest). Have to think the judge
 who wrote the decision was amused as well.
 
 Is that the guy you were thinking of?


Yep.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Ooooh, I like this one: awareness of awareness!

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
  
   It's one of Scientology's Super Powers...see the last paragraph.
   
   --
   
   
   Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:17 p.m. EDT
   Scientologists Ready for 'Super Power'
   www.newsmax.com
  
  [...]
   
   Scientology's 57 perceptics include endocrine 
 states, awareness 
   of awareness, cellular and bacterial position, motion of 
   self, time track motion and awareness of not knowing.
   
  
  One wonders if there is ANY equivalence here with TM.
  
  I used to think that every spiritual tradition was talking about 
 the same thing when they 
  used terms like samadhi and satori and so on, but while it may 
 have been the case in the 
  distant past, I don't think its true any more.
  
  The physiology that results from various spiritual practices is 
 just too radically different 
  even if the terms used are the same.
 
 
 
 Awareness of awareness can only mean one thing, no?


No. It could mean any number of things, assuming that the claim awareness of 
awareness has specific physiological correlates. Two different people can describe the 
same sunset using different words, or two entirely different (to most of us) phenomena 
using the same words.

I saw a flying saucer might refer to a genuine porcelin saucer in Frisbee flight, or to an 
alien spacecraft or to some other UFO phenomenon like swamp gas.

I am aware of awareness might refer to some TC/CC state, or to a derealization state 
brought about by child sexual abuse or ongoing extreme stress which have distinctly 
different EEG patterns. We don't know the physiological correlates of the Scientology state 
and they won't let anyone measure them.














To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Jesus Predicts Next Florida Gov.

2006-05-23 Thread markmeredith2002



Pastor: Lord Revealed Next Fla. Governor

By BRENDAN FARRINGTON, AP Political WriterMon May 22, 5:25 PM ET

A reverend who introduced Republican gubernatorial candidate Charlie
Crist during a breakfast with other pastors Monday said the Lord came
to him in a dream two years ago and told him Crist would be the
state's next governor.

The Rev. O'Neal Dozier said that before the dream he did not know
Crist, nor had Crist made known his plans to run for governor.

The Lord Jesus spoke to me and he said 'There's something I want you
to know,' said Dozier, pastor of the Worldwide Christian Center in
Pompano Beach. 'Charlie Crist will be the next governor of the state
of Florida.'

Since then, Dozier has spent time with Crist and talked with him at
length about policy. He told the group that Crist would be
uncompromising in his Christian faith.


I introduce to you, as the Lord Jesus has said, the next governor of
the state of Florida, Charlie Crist, Dozier said.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Natural law at work?competion is better 4 us all,Wal_...

2006-05-23 Thread sparaig



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
 
  
  In a message dated 5/22/06 7:13:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
  shempmcgurk@ writes:
  
  What's the traditional way? Mixing the spices clockwise 
 instead 
  of counter-clockwise?
  
  Or perhaps its how I saw TrigunaJi's teenage apprentice mix the 
  concoctions that I bought at his outdoor clinic in Dehli: lay 
 down 
  a bunch of squares cut from the Times of India newspaper, take 
 jars 
  of dirt (or whatever it is he put in his mixtures) and spill them 
  out over the newspaper squares, and then fold up the pieces of 
  newspaper into little packets (which I was then told to take with 
 a 
  glass of water each day).
  
  
  
  
  The key here is, if your taking herbs for depression, those 
 squares of news 
  paper must be the funnies.
 
 
 
 Truth is stranger than fiction: a friend of mine was prescribed 
 reading the funny papers by TriGunaJi.


Is he the guy that Chopra mentions in _Return of the Rishi_?









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











  1   2   >