[FairfieldLife] RE: Cool analysis of the beginning of Genesis (b#39;resheet or beresheet)
[FairfieldLife] Types of sauna
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
Anartaxius opines: AUTHFRIEND WROTE: Share's true motives have been evident to halfway- perceptive people for a long time, actually. Unfortunately that doesn't include Share (or Steve, for that matter). It isn't Seraphita's fault that she hasn't seen the full picture yet; she hasn't been here as a regular for long enough. The question that could be asked here is, what would be evident to fully-perceptive people in this same situation, now that you halfway-perceptives have nailed Share's true motives? This is what is called in the biz well-poisoning. It's where the self-declared authority asserts something negative about one of his/her enemies, in an attempt to get other people to see them negatively, the way they should. It's a tactic we've seen used by Judy for almost 20 years now. Funny how *she*, as a supposed halfway-perceptive person, didn't have reservations about Share back when she first appeared on the forum, during the period when she was trying to recruit her for the Mean Girls Clique. Funny how she didn't continually rag on Share during the short period Share fell for it (before wising up), and was ragging on the MGC enemies she was expected to rag on. Funny how everything changed when Share started to make her own decisions about who was an appropriate person to have non-hostile conversations with and who was not. Just sayin'... [Note: prevaricators' intrusions into my point here, under the guise of 'comments', is ill advised for integrity reasons] For those who missed the humor here, this is a reference to Judy's recent declaration that she would never have any further discussions with Anartaxius until he either documented something she thought he inferred about her, or apologized for it. He did neither, especially because any such inference was only in her paranoid, self- important, it's-all-about-me mind. So at that point, she went back on her declaration and effectively proved herself to be the liar or prevaricator he is referring to here. She (who humbly *also* declares about herself I never lie) has been trying to pretend ever since that this incident never happened. So I thought that in the interest of honesty and integrity, I should remind her that it did. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote: that's excellent tho I prefer the Willie Nelson version Willie actually got the song from Emmylou, not from Townes Van Zandt directly, and then recorded it in a very popular version with Merle Haggard. He tells the story of that discovery (and performs the song with Emmylou) here. Their version was excellent, partly because both Willie and Merle are such outlaws themselves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cafe Nostalgia It was probably the use of Marty Robbins' El Paso in the final episode of Breaking Bad that got me thinking about it, but ever since I've been on kind of a music kick, finding and listening to classic outlaw songs. El Paso is obviously one of the greats in that category, but it's another old outlaw song that's stuck in my head tonight, and it's even brought back some pleasant memories about my time in the TM movement, so I'll share them with you. Back in early 1977, when I first heard the song, I was living at the TM National Headquarters at the end of Sunset Blvd. I was working there as personnel director for a few months before my Sidhis course, and lived on the premises in one of the rooms (it was formerly a motel, for those of you who never went there). It was a cool place to live -- a block from the beach, next door to the Yogananda Lake Shrine -- and even though I was making shit money I was earning precious (at the time) course credits, so I made the best of living there. It was there I first heard Emmylou Harris' version of a great Townes Van Sandt outlaw song called Pancho and Lefty. I remember listening to it one night with my girlfriend, who I had had to sneak into my room, the both of us feeling very much like outlaws ourselves for having sex there in the TM National Headquarters. :-) Anyway, it's a great song, and listening to it again in a Paris cafe -- all these years later -- I still love it. I also love -- all these years later -- still feeling like an outlaw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3LQeRqTBK4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3LQeRqTBK4
[FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia (musings about outlaws)
Here's a related (at least in my mind) treat. It's a marvelously creative animated open letter to J. J. Abrams telling him how not to screw up the future movies in the Star Wars franchise the way he and others have screwed them up in the past. And the rules these fans propose are both brilliant and right on. Star Wars is a Western, and it's about outlaws just gettin' by out on the frontier. Mess that up, and you mess up the whole concept. http://io9.com/a-beautifully-animated-open-letter-to-j-j-abrams-about-1\ 397273170 http://io9.com/a-beautifully-animated-open-letter-to-j-j-abrams-about-1\ 397273170 http://io9.com/a-beautifully-animated-open-letter-to-j-j-abrams-about-13\ 97273170 http://io9.com/a-beautifully-animated-open-letter-to-j-j-abrams-about-1\ 397273170 Following these simple rules is what made Star Wars work originally, and it's what made Firefly work. Heck, these rules were even what made the original Japanese film that Star Wars ripped off (The Hidden Fortress) work; that was an outlaw story, too. Mess with outlaws at your peril... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote: that's excellent tho I prefer the Willie Nelson version Willie actually got the song from Emmylou, not from Townes Van Zandt directly, and then recorded it in a very popular version with Merle Haggard. He tells the story of that discovery (and performs the song with Emmylou) here. Their version was excellent, partly because both Willie and Merle are such outlaws themselves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cafe Nostalgia It was probably the use of Marty Robbins' El Paso in the final episode of Breaking Bad that got me thinking about it, but ever since I've been on kind of a music kick, finding and listening to classic outlaw songs. El Paso is obviously one of the greats in that category, but it's another old outlaw song that's stuck in my head tonight, and it's even brought back some pleasant memories about my time in the TM movement, so I'll share them with you. Back in early 1977, when I first heard the song, I was living at the TM National Headquarters at the end of Sunset Blvd. I was working there as personnel director for a few months before my Sidhis course, and lived on the premises in one of the rooms (it was formerly a motel, for those of you who never went there). It was a cool place to live -- a block from the beach, next door to the Yogananda Lake Shrine -- and even though I was making shit money I was earning precious (at the time) course credits, so I made the best of living there. It was there I first heard Emmylou Harris' version of a great Townes Van Sandt outlaw song called Pancho and Lefty. I remember listening to it one night with my girlfriend, who I had had to sneak into my room, the both of us feeling very much like outlaws ourselves for having sex there in the TM National Headquarters. :-) Anyway, it's a great song, and listening to it again in a Paris cafe -- all these years later -- I still love it. I also love -- all these years later -- still feeling like an outlaw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3LQeRqTBK4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3LQeRqTBK4
[FairfieldLife] Orthodox Rabbi Reveals Name of Messiah quot;JESUSquot;,quot;Yehoshuaquot; or
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
turq, what I love about this clip is seeing so much *soul* in Emmylou and Willie, 2 very successful entertainers. I bet lots of entertainers have lots of soul, but maybe many of them sort of hide that, thinking they have to do so in order to be successful. It's a treat for me to see 2 who do not hide their soul. If that's what it means to be an outlaw, then power to the renegades I say! From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 2:54 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote: that's excellent tho I prefer the Willie Nelson version Willie actually got the song from Emmylou, not from Townes Van Zandt directly, and then recorded it in a very popular version with Merle Haggard. He tells the story of that discovery (and performs the song with Emmylou) here. Their version was excellent, partly because both Willie and Merle are such outlaws themselves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cafe Nostalgia It was probably the use of Marty Robbins' El Paso in the final episode of Breaking Bad that got me thinking about it, but ever since I've been on kind of a music kick, finding and listening to classic outlaw songs. El Paso is obviously one of the greats in that category, but it's another old outlaw song that's stuck in my head tonight, and it's even brought back some pleasant memories about my time in the TM movement, so I'll share them with you. Back in early 1977, when I first heard the song, I was living at the TM National Headquarters at the end of Sunset Blvd. I was working there as personnel director for a few months before my Sidhis course, and lived on the premises in one of the rooms (it was formerly a motel, for those of you who never went there). It was a cool place to live -- a block from the beach, next door to the Yogananda Lake Shrine -- and even though I was making shit money I was earning precious (at the time) course credits, so I made the best of living there. It was there I first heard Emmylou Harris' version of a great Townes Van Sandt outlaw song called Pancho and Lefty. I remember listening to it one night with my girlfriend, who I had had to sneak into my room, the both of us feeling very much like outlaws ourselves for having sex there in the TM National Headquarters. :-) Anyway, it's a great song, and listening to it again in a Paris cafe -- all these years later -- I still love it. I also love -- all these years later -- still feeling like an outlaw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3LQeRqTBK4
Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. One imagines all kinds of conversations they then had. Maybe he was a risk taker. Maybe he was questioning his aura reading abilities and wanted to experiment. Maybe he came out of meditation too fast (-: I think doing TM balances brain functioning. That might mean that the reptilian brain no longer dominates one's decision making process. From: s3raph...@yahoo.com s3raph...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 9:46 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Itzhak Bentov wrote a couple of entertaining books exploring new-agey ideas back in the 1970s. He was also a keen advocate of transcendental meditation -but not a starry-eyed advocate as he was also an early pioneer in exploring the issue of kundalini syndrome and he knew from personal experience that TM could have unpleasant side-effects. On which, see the appendix to Stalking the Wild Pendulum. One thing that's always puzzled me is the story that as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura and so he knew that they were all destined to die. He got on the plane anyway . . . and so bye-bye Bentov. Now, if he really realised that the plane was going tits up why did he board the aircraft? Does doing TM damage your survival instinct?
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Ishvara - The Transcendental Person
thank you for posting this - its much better than Willy Tex's inane ramblings - I'm gonna get this book - it looks interesting From: emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:16 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Ishvara - The Transcendental Person Prairie Dog! If you knew more you'd be embarrassed by your claims. I've replied many times with the accurate and accepted scholarship that casts a harsh light on your antiquated conjectures. Your reply is a study in troll behaviors. You reply with Maybe so ... but and then continue repeating the same line. I have concluded that you really are just a type of troll ... with all the indications of dishonesty that term implies. However, for the sake of anyone reading this follow, up here is a text that examines Gautama Buddha's meditation teachings in light of his own claimed Brahmanic gurus. The Origin of Buddhist Meditation (Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism) Alexander Wynne (Author) Publication Date: June 8, 2007 | ISBN-10:041554467X | ISBN-13:978-0415544672 | Edition: 1 Having identified early material that goes back to the Buddha himself, the author argues that the two teachers of the Buddha were historical figures. Based on the early Brahminic literature, namely the early Upanishads and Moksadharma, the author asserts the origin of the method of meditation learned by the Buddha from these teachers, and attempts to use them to identify some authentic teachings of the Buddha on meditation. Stimulating debate within the field of Buddhist Studies, the following claims are put forward: * the Buddha was taught by Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta, as stated in the literature of numerous early Buddhist sects, is historically authentic * * Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta taught a form of early Brahminic meditation * * the Buddha must consequently have been trained in a meditative school whose ideology was provided by the philosophical portions of early Upanishads Shedding new light on a fascinating aspect of the origins of Buddhism, this book will be of interest to academics in the field of Buddhist studies, Asian religion and South Asian studies. Willy Prairie Dog sez: Around here, if it looks like a yoga and it feels like a yoga, then it probably is a yoga. If it's a yoga, then it's probably a Buddhist yoga. There was no yoga in India before the historical Buddha. TM looks like it is yoga to me, so it's probably Buddhist yoga of some kind. Go figure. So, now we know the origin of the Buddhist yoga: in the Vajrayana sect of Mahayana Buddhism. According to what I've read, Vajrayana Buddhism was centered in Uddiyana, located in the modern day Swat Valley in what is now Kashmere, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Tantric Buddhist yoga was imported into South Asia where it became Shaktism. Are you starting to follow the history now? In 747 the Indian master Padmasambhava traveled from Afghanistan to bring Vajrayana Buddhism to Tibet and Bhutan, at the request of the king of Tibet...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: turq, what I love about this clip is seeing so much *soul* in Emmylou and Willie, 2 very successful entertainers. I bet lots of entertainers have lots of soul, but maybe many of them sort of hide that, thinking they have to do so in order to be successful. It's a treat for me to see 2 who do not hide their soul. If that's what it means to be an outlaw, then power to the renegades I say! Agreed. With Emmylou, she's always been a total *individual*, from the moment she was first discovered by her mentor Gram Parsons. She's one of those women who went gray early (in her very early 30s), and I always liked that she not only didn't try to hide it, she celebrated it by going gray entirely, and very fashionably. On the other hand, I wish she hadn't gone the Botox route with her face, because although it still looks young, when she speaks you can see that it's partly frozen in place. With Willie, what can one say? He's never tried to hide what he is or his occasional bad habits (marijuana, tax evasion), or the fact that he's a crusty old bastard and proud of it. He just is what he is, and makes no apologies for it. If you call that soul, no problem. I call it character. In this day and age, with the government knowing pretty much everything about all of our lives, reading our emails, and listen- ing in to all of our phone calls, there is no way *to* successfully hide who you are. The only defense against such a world is *to be in public exactly who you are in private, and Not Give A Shit*. Doing that gives you freedom. It also IMO gives you character. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 2:54 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote: that's excellent tho I prefer the Willie Nelson version Willie actually got the song from Emmylou, not from Townes Van Zandt directly, and then recorded it in a very popular version with Merle Haggard. He tells the story of that discovery (and performs the song with Emmylou) here. Their version was excellent, partly because both Willie and Merle are such outlaws themselves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0Â From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cafe Nostalgia It was probably the use of Marty Robbins' El Paso in the final episode of Breaking Bad that got me thinking about it, but ever since I've been on kind of a music kick, finding and listening to classic outlaw songs. El Paso is obviously one of the greats in that category, but it's another old outlaw song that's stuck in my head tonight, and it's even brought back some pleasant memories about my time in the TM movement, so I'll share them with you. Back in early 1977, when I first heard the song, I was living at the TM National Headquarters at the end of Sunset Blvd. I was working there as personnel director for a few months before my Sidhis course, and lived on the premises in one of the rooms (it was formerly a motel, for those of you who never went there). It was a cool place to live -- a block from the beach, next door to the Yogananda Lake Shrine -- and even though I was making shit money I was earning precious (at the time) course credits, so I made the best of living there. It was there I first heard Emmylou Harris' version of a great Townes Van Sandt outlaw song called Pancho and Lefty. I remember listening to it one night with my girlfriend, who I had had to sneak into my room, the both of us feeling very much like outlaws ourselves for having sex there in the TM National Headquarters.ÃÂ :-) Anyway, it's a great song, and listening to it again in a Paris cafe -- all these years later -- I still love it. I also love -- all these years later -- still feeling like an outlaw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3LQeRqTBK4Â
Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
I listened to a set of audio tapes of a seminar he taught - a guy at MIU was a big fan of his and had been allowed to tape the seminar - Bentov discussed TM a little - he said it was a nice meditation but he said the Movement was not too much to brag about. From: s3raph...@yahoo.com s3raph...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:46 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Itzhak Bentov wrote a couple of entertaining books exploring new-agey ideas back in the 1970s. He was also a keen advocate of transcendental meditation -but not a starry-eyed advocate as he was also an early pioneer in exploring the issue of kundalini syndrome and he knew from personal experience that TM could have unpleasant side-effects. On which, see the appendix to Stalking the Wild Pendulum. One thing that's always puzzled me is the story that as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura and so he knew that they were all destined to die. He got on the plane anyway . . . and so bye-bye Bentov. Now, if he really realised that the plane was going tits up why did he board the aircraft? Does doing TM damage your survival instinct?
Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
Xeno, just using simple logic, I'd speculate that a fully perceptive person would label me as being like everyone else, a mix of developed and undeveloped aspects; that my basic motive is the same basic motive that propels all humans, to live more fully. My question is how would a fully perceptive person behave given that we're all in this together. There is a phenomenon in psychology called the Anniversary Effect or the Anniversary Reaction. It can be conscious or unconscious. Yesterday was the one year anniversary of my accusing RWC of pr. My guess is that RWC's supporters were consciously or unconsciously reacting to what was an upsetting event for them. But I have to ask: why do they continue to be SO upset about it. My conclusion is unresolved issues from childhood are at work. AND, projecting a lot of their shadow about RWC onto me. Otherwise they would have moved on from this dynamic long ago. IMO. From: anartax...@yahoo.com anartax...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:03 PM Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC AUTHFRIEND WROTE: Share's true motives have been evident to halfway-perceptive people for a long time, actually. Unfortunately that doesn't include Share (or Steve, for that matter). It isn't Seraphita's fault that she hasn't seen the full picture yet; she hasn't been here as a regular for long enough. The question that could be asked here is, what would be evident to fully-perceptive people in this same situation, now that you halfway-perceptives have nailed Share's true motives? [Note: prevaricators' intrusions into my point here, under the guise of 'comments', is ill advised for integrity reasons]
[FairfieldLife] Pirates, Outlaws and Superheroes, for metrosexuals
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
turq, so I guess the learning for me is how to balance that being transparent with what noozguru was calling having reserve. I'd call character the result of living our soul more and more. I'd say that's what both Emmylou and Willie do to a great extent. Thanks again for posting that. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 6:33 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: turq, what I love about this clip is seeing so much *soul* in Emmylou and Willie, 2 very successful entertainers. I bet lots of entertainers have lots of soul, but maybe many of them sort of hide that, thinking they have to do so in order to be successful. It's a treat for me to see 2 who do not hide their soul. If that's what it means to be an outlaw, then power to the renegades I say! Agreed. With Emmylou, she's always been a total *individual*, from the moment she was first discovered by her mentor Gram Parsons. She's one of those women who went gray early (in her very early 30s), and I always liked that she not only didn't try to hide it, she celebrated it by going gray entirely, and very fashionably. On the other hand, I wish she hadn't gone the Botox route with her face, because although it still looks young, when she speaks you can see that it's partly frozen in place. With Willie, what can one say? He's never tried to hide what he is or his occasional bad habits (marijuana, tax evasion), or the fact that he's a crusty old bastard and proud of it. He just is what he is, and makes no apologies for it. If you call that soul, no problem. I call it character. In this day and age, with the government knowing pretty much everything about all of our lives, reading our emails, and listen- ing in to all of our phone calls, there is no way *to* successfully hide who you are. The only defense against such a world is *to be in public exactly who you are in private, and Not Give A Shit*. Doing that gives you freedom. It also IMO gives you character. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 2:54 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote: that's excellent tho I prefer the Willie Nelson version Willie actually got the song from Emmylou, not from Townes Van Zandt directly, and then recorded it in a very popular version with Merle Haggard. He tells the story of that discovery (and performs the song with Emmylou) here. Their version was excellent, partly because both Willie and Merle are such outlaws themselves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cafe Nostalgia It was probably the use of Marty Robbins' El Paso in the final episode of Breaking Bad that got me thinking about it, but ever since I've been on kind of a music kick, finding and listening to classic outlaw songs. El Paso is obviously one of the greats in that category, but it's another old outlaw song that's stuck in my head tonight, and it's even brought back some pleasant memories about my time in the TM movement, so I'll share them with you. Back in early 1977, when I first heard the song, I was living at the TM National Headquarters at the end of Sunset Blvd. I was working there as personnel director for a few months before my Sidhis course, and lived on the premises in one of the rooms (it was formerly a motel, for those of you who never went there). It was a cool place to live -- a block from the beach, next door to the Yogananda Lake Shrine -- and even though I was making shit money I was earning precious (at the time) course credits, so I made the best of living there. It was there I first heard Emmylou Harris' version of a great Townes Van Sandt outlaw song called Pancho and Lefty. I remember listening to it one night with my girlfriend, who I had had to sneak into my room, the both of us feeling very much like outlaws ourselves for having sex there in the TM National Headquarters. :-) Anyway, it's a great song, and listening to it again in a Paris cafe -- all these years later -- I still love it. I also love -- all these years later -- still feeling like an outlaw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3LQeRqTBK4Â
[FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: turq, so I guess the learning for me is how to balance that being transparent with what noozguru was calling having reserve. I'd call character the result of living our soul more and more. I'd say that's what both Emmylou and Willie do to a great extent. Thanks again for posting that. I think the point that you -- and the other poster consistently at the top of the Post Count list -- still don't get, and still aren't willing to take any responsibility for, is that living your soul causes you to make *twice as many posts* as anyone else on the forum. You both seem to react as if this is your right, and has no impact on anyone else, or on the overall readability of the group as a whole. THIS is what I was getting at in my STFU post. That and the constant need (on both sides) to defend yourselves against perceived affronts, and turn them into multi-post threads *that no one is inter- ested in except yourselves*. Just sayin'...
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Ishvara - The Transcendental Person
Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta, the teachers of the historical Buddha, of course were Sramanas of the Buddhist persuasion - that's why they were practicing yoga and meditation. Not because they were Hindus who reverted the Vedas. There's no yoga mentioned in the Vedas - that came much later, and all the Upanishads were composed AFTER the Buddha's demise. The similarity between the views of Gaudapada and Nagarjuna cannot be missed. Gaudapada himself acknowledges this when he says, There are some (shunyavadins) who uphold non-dualism (advayavada) and reject both the extreme views of being and non-being, of production and destruction and thus emphatically proclaim the doctrine of no-origination. We approve, says Gaudapada, of the doctrine of no-origination proclaimed by them. Swami Nikhilananda on Mandukya Up: From the fact that many Buddhist terms are used in explaining the fourth state, such as Sunyata or emptiness, it is clear that this commentary was written in an era when the concepts of the Mulamadhyamakakarika school of Mahayana Buddhism were influential and renowned. Mandukya Upanishad: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandukya_Upanishad On 10/1/2013 9:16 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Prairie Dog! If you knew more you'd be embarrassed by your claims. I've replied many times with the accurate and accepted scholarship that casts a harsh light on your antiquated conjectures. Your reply is a study in troll behaviors. You reply with Maybe so ... but and then continue repeating the same line. I have concluded that you really are just a type of troll ... with all the indications of dishonesty that term implies. However, for the sake of anyone reading this follow, up here is a text that examines Gautama Buddha's meditation teachings in light of his own claimed Brahmanic gurus. *The Origin of Buddhist Meditation (Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism) * Alexander Wynne http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Wynne/e/B001JCEE2S/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1/180-4305227-2750419 (Author) Publication Date: *June 8, 2007* | ISBN-10:*041554467X *| ISBN-13:*978-0415544672* | Edition: *1* * * Having identified early material that goes back to the Buddha himself, the author argues that the two teachers of the Buddha were historical figures. Based on the early Brahminic literature, namely the early Upanishads and Moksadharma, the author asserts the origin of the method of meditation learned by the Buddha from these teachers, and attempts to use them to identify some authentic teachings of the Buddha on meditation. Stimulating debate within the field of Buddhist Studies, the following claims are put forward: * the Buddha was taught by Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta, as stated in the literature of numerous early Buddhist sects, is historically authentic * * Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta taught a form of early Brahminic meditation * * the Buddha must consequently have been trained in a meditative school whose ideology was provided by the philosophical portions of early Upanishads Shedding new light on a fascinating aspect of the origins of Buddhism, this book will be of interest to academics in the field of Buddhist studies, Asian religion and South Asian studies. Willy Prairie Dog sez: Around here, if it looks like a yoga and it feels like a yoga, then it probably is a yoga. If it's a yoga, then it's probably a Buddhist yoga. There was no yoga in India before the historical Buddha. TM looks like it is yoga to me, so it's probably Buddhist yoga of some kind. Go figure. So, now we know the origin of the Buddhist yoga: in the Vajrayana sect of Mahayana Buddhism. According to what I've read, Vajrayana Buddhism was centered in Uddiyana, located in the modern day Swat Valley in what is now Kashmere, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Tantric Buddhist yoga was imported into South Asia where it became Shaktism. Are you starting to follow the history now? In 747 the Indian master Padmasambhava traveled from Afghanistan to bring Vajrayana Buddhism to Tibet and Bhutan, at the request of the king of Tibet... .
Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Does every message posted to this discussion group have to turn into an argument with you? Are you the new FFL moderator? Is it alright with you Judy, if I have a one minute conversation with Share - just one minute- without you butting in to start another fight. You'd think that after thirty posts on the Post Count thread, you'd have said all you need to. I mean, what does it say about you - it's only 8:00 AM and you already slammed three people today. LoL! Sometimes I get the feeling you want the posting limits reinstated. Go figure. On 10/2/2013 7:52 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (*as he was boarding* American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one *on the plane* had an aura)?
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Ishvara - The Transcendental Person
The similarity between the views of Gaudapada and Nagarjuna cannot be missed. Gaudapada himself acknowledges this when he says, There are some (shunyavadins) who uphold non-dualism (advayavada) and reject both the extreme views of being and non-being, of production and destruction and thus emphatically proclaim the doctrine of no-origination. We approve, says Gaudapada, of the doctrine of no-origination proclaimed by them. Gaudapada: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaudapada Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0365-5, p.239 On 10/2/2013 6:31 AM, Michael Jackson wrote: thank you for posting this - its much better than Willy Tex's inane ramblings - I'm gonna get this book - it looks interesting *From:* emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:16 PM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] RE: Ishvara - The Transcendental Person Prairie Dog! If you knew more you'd be embarrassed by your claims. I've replied many times with the accurate and accepted scholarship that casts a harsh light on your antiquated conjectures. Your reply is a study in troll behaviors. You reply with Maybe so ... but and then continue repeating the same line. I have concluded that you really are just a type of troll ... with all the indications of dishonesty that term implies. However, for the sake of anyone reading this follow, up here is a text that examines Gautama Buddha's meditation teachings in light of his own claimed Brahmanic gurus. *The Origin of Buddhist Meditation (Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism) * Alexander Wynne http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Wynne/e/B001JCEE2S/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1/180-4305227-2750419 (Author) Publication Date: *June 8, 2007* | ISBN-10:*041554467X *| ISBN-13:*978-0415544672* | Edition: *1* * * Having identified early material that goes back to the Buddha himself, the author argues that the two teachers of the Buddha were historical figures. Based on the early Brahminic literature, namely the early Upanishads and Moksadharma, the author asserts the origin of the method of meditation learned by the Buddha from these teachers, and attempts to use them to identify some authentic teachings of the Buddha on meditation. Stimulating debate within the field of Buddhist Studies, the following claims are put forward: * the Buddha was taught by Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta, as stated in the literature of numerous early Buddhist sects, is historically authentic * * Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta taught a form of early Brahminic meditation * * the Buddha must consequently have been trained in a meditative school whose ideology was provided by the philosophical portions of early Upanishads Shedding new light on a fascinating aspect of the origins of Buddhism, this book will be of interest to academics in the field of Buddhist studies, Asian religion and South Asian studies. Willy Prairie Dog sez: Around here, if it looks like a yoga and it feels like a yoga, then it probably is a yoga. If it's a yoga, then it's probably a Buddhist yoga. There was no yoga in India before the historical Buddha. TM looks like it is yoga to me, so it's probably Buddhist yoga of some kind. Go figure. So, now we know the origin of the Buddhist yoga: in the Vajrayana sect of Mahayana Buddhism. According to what I've read, Vajrayana Buddhism was centered in Uddiyana, located in the modern day Swat Valley in what is now Kashmere, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Tantric Buddhist yoga was imported into South Asia where it became Shaktism. Are you starting to follow the history now? In 747 the Indian master Padmasambhava traveled from Afghanistan to bring Vajrayana Buddhism to Tibet and Bhutan, at the request of the king of Tibet...
[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Cafe Nostalgia (musings about outlaws)
RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
[FairfieldLife] RE: Pirates, Outlaws and Superheroes, for metrosexuals
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
[FairfieldLife] RE: Cafe Nostalgia [1 Attachment]
[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Cafe Nostalgia
RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: US Federal Government Is Shut Down
I don't know about this *amendment*, but people renounce their citizenship all the time. In fact it's at record levels today. People don't secede, they renounce citizenship, give up their passports. Governmental entities secede. When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal stations to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind, requires that they separate, that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. Our own declaration of Independence. I don't think the Supreme Court ever ruled as to whether session is legal or not. Jefferson Davis was never brought to trial for fear the Supreme Court would rule in his favor, that the Southern states had the right to secede just as the colonies seceded from Great Britain. Anyway we're not there yet. Moving in that direction but a long way to go. From: jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 7:13 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: US Federal Government Is Shut Down Mike, I've read these arguments that you mentioned before. I believe there's an Amendment in the US Constitution that states any American born in the US cannot secede from the Union. So, it doesn't appear that any Texans in the state can qualify for seceding from the USA. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Of course the US can annex other countries if they petition to join. Texas was a free Republic once they gained independence from Mexico. Joined the Union in 1845. As a Repubic, Texas has always claimed the right to leave the union. Not so sure the civil war settled that issue since the other states were never independent republics. Texas also intered under the stipulation that it could subdivide into five seperate states. From: jr_esq@... jr_esq@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 1:33 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: US Federal Government Is Shut Down Mike, I actually believe that it's possible for the US to acquire other states in the world. It's possible for Canada to voluntary join in since the two countries are already fairly similar in cultures. Although the national language differs, it's also possible for Mexico to be annexed just like all of the southwestern states, which were originally part of Mexico before the Mexican-American War. But given the fiscal turf battles in Congress at this time, it doesn't appear the US has the power to unify the interests of everyone. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote: Can ju se, Ola! hable Espanol? From: jr_esq@... jr_esq@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] US Federal Government Is Shut Down Bhairitu, I just looked up in Wikipedia about the three potential states in California, which includes the wannabee state of Jefferson, located in northern California. It sounds ideal. But I don't believe Governor Brown or his successors will let this happen. For one, politics and money will eventually get in the way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secession_in_California Also, I read about the concept of Nine Nations of North America. The idea is fascinating. But who would like to be called a resident of the Empty Quarter? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Perhaps the stupid country should fall. US Government is an oxymoron anymore. Perhaps we ought to be 9 different countries instead, along the geographical lines of the Nine Nations of North America. That always made sense to me. California, as it is, should be 3 states anyway. The area would get 4 more Senators but we really do need to get rid of Diane Fein$tein. Then maybe we could have what other countries have and that is Single Payer healthcare. Instead we waste trillions on foreign wars to protect American interests. Not they count on the public thinking American interests are going after terrorists and establishing democracies when really American interests are the US corporate pirates who want to raid the country for it's resources. Secondly we need to get rid of the AMA who keeps people out of medical school who have a true interest in medicine and instead support the old boys network of sons and daughters of mediocre MDs attending medical school. On 10/01/2013 09:48 AM, doctordumbass@... wrote: Funny thing - My health insurance policy just expired, because it doesn't meet the provisions of the new law. When I first signed up a year ago, my policy premium, which only covers
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Seraphita, just so you know, I didn't ignore what you wrote. I skimmed and I forgot. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:52 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura)?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Orthodox Rabbi Reveals Name of Messiah JESUS,Yehoshua or
and you shall see Me coming in the clouds of Heaven and sitting at the right hand of the power of God. From: cardemais...@yahoo.com cardemais...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 2:50 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Orthodox Rabbi Reveals Name of Messiah JESUS,Yehoshua or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0DTT3u2JZ8
Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Richard, like I said to Xeno, some RWC supporters are still mad at me for the upsets RWC and I had. Some are obsessed IMO and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy and unbalanced way. From: Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com To: Richard J. Williams FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Does every message posted to this discussion group have to turn into an argument with you? Are you the new FFL moderator? Is it alright with you Judy, if I have a one minute conversation with Share - just one minute- without you butting in to start another fight. You'd think that after thirty posts on the Post Count thread, you'd have said all you need to. I mean, what does it say about you - it's only 8:00 AM and you already slammed three people today. LoL! Sometimes I get the feeling you want the posting limits reinstated. Go figure. On 10/2/2013 7:52 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura)?
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: US Federal Government Is Shut Down
Mike, thanks for providing this good info about the difference bt individuals and groups separating from a group. It's great to learn something new. From: Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 9:04 AM Subject: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: US Federal Government Is Shut Down I don't know about this *amendment*, but people renounce their citizenship all the time. In fact it's at record levels today. People don't secede, they renounce citizenship, give up their passports. Governmental entities secede. When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal stations to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind, requires that they separate, that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. Our own declaration of Independence. I don't think the Supreme Court ever ruled as to whether session is legal or not. Jefferson Davis was never brought to trial for fear the Supreme Court would rule in his favor, that the Southern states had the right to secede just as the colonies seceded from Great Britain. Anyway we're not there yet. Moving in that direction but a long way to go. From: jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 7:13 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: US Federal Government Is Shut Down Mike, I've read these arguments that you mentioned before. I believe there's an Amendment in the US Constitution that states any American born in the US cannot secede from the Union. So, it doesn't appear that any Texans in the state can qualify for seceding from the USA. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Of course the US can annex other countries if they petition to join. Texas was a free Republic once they gained independence from Mexico. Joined the Union in 1845. As a Repubic, Texas has always claimed the right to leave the union. Not so sure the civil war settled that issue since the other states were never independent republics. Texas also intered under the stipulation that it could subdivide into five seperate states. From: jr_esq@... jr_esq@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 1:33 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: US Federal Government Is Shut Down Mike, I actually believe that it's possible for the US to acquire other states in the world. It's possible for Canada to voluntary join in since the two countries are already fairly similar in cultures. Although the national language differs, it's also possible for Mexico to be annexed just like all of the southwestern states, which were originally part of Mexico before the Mexican-American War. But given the fiscal turf battles in Congress at this time, it doesn't appear the US has the power to unify the interests of everyone. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote: Can ju se, Ola! hable Espanol? From: jr_esq@... jr_esq@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] US Federal Government Is Shut Down Bhairitu, I just looked up in Wikipedia about the three potential states in California, which includes the wannabee state of Jefferson, located in northern California. It sounds ideal. But I don't believe Governor Brown or his successors will let this happen. For one, politics and money will eventually get in the way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secession_in_California Also, I read about the concept of Nine Nations of North America. The idea is fascinating. But who would like to be called a resident of the Empty Quarter? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Perhaps the stupid country should fall. US Government is an oxymoron anymore. Perhaps we ought to be 9 different countries instead, along the geographical lines of the Nine Nations of North America. That always made sense to me. California, as it is, should be 3 states anyway. The area would get 4 more Senators but we really do need to get rid of Diane Fein$tein. Then maybe we could have what other countries have and that is Single Payer healthcare. Instead we waste trillions on foreign wars to protect American interests. Not they count on the public thinking American interests are going after terrorists and establishing democracies when really American interests are the US corporate pirates who want to raid the country for it's resources. Secondly we need to get rid of the AMA who keeps people out of medical school who have a true interest in medicine and instead support the old boys network of sons and daughters
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
turq, I'm taking in what Xeno and you are saying. I think I'll have to take it on faith that it's difficult for some to scroll down, not open emails, whatever. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:09 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: turq, so I guess the learning for me is how to balance that being transparent with what noozguru was calling having reserve. I'd call character the result of living our soul more and more. I'd say that's what both Emmylou and Willie do to a great extent. Thanks again for posting that. I think the point that you -- and the other poster consistently at the top of the Post Count list -- still don't get, and still aren't willing to take any responsibility for, is that living your soul causes you to make *twice as many posts* as anyone else on the forum. You both seem to react as if this is your right, and has no impact on anyone else, or on the overall readability of the group as a whole. THIS is what I was getting at in my STFU post. That and the constant need (on both sides) to defend yourselves against perceived affronts, and turn them into multi-post threads *that no one is inter- ested in except yourselves*. Just sayin'...
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: [FairfieldLife] Orthodox Rabbi Reveals Name of Messiah JESUS,Yehoshua or
http://youtu.be/gf-1NTgIJDQ Hope this hyperlink works. Very interesting talk if you can get through it. Four Blood Moons. From: cardemais...@yahoo.com cardemais...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 2:50 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Orthodox Rabbi Reveals Name of Messiah JESUS,Yehoshua or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0DTT3u2JZ8
[FairfieldLife] Peter Francis Dziuban: New Interview on Buddha at the Gas Pump - 10/02/2013
blog updates from Buddha at the Gas Pump http://gallery.mailchimp.com/e709a491029b04e745834d34d/images/star.gif published 10/02/2013 195. Peter Francis Dziuban http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=05853ae911e=16e07f16fe Oct 01, 2013 07:46 am | Rick Peter Francis Dziuban (pronounced Joobin) is a writer and speaker on awareness and spirituality. His first book, Consciousness Is All: Now Life Is Completely New, has helped thousands enjoy greater happiness, freedom and clarity in Life. Peter has just completed … Continue reading http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=06aec848d3e=16e07f16fe → The post 195. Peter Francis Dziuban http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=ce531bb62be=16e07f16fe appeared first on Buddha at the Gas Pump http://batgap.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=7c8960e8d1e=16e07f16fe . http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/images/mime-type/mp3.png 195_peter_francis_dziuban.mp3 http://batgap.us2.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=bd6b69c380e=16e07f16fe 63.3 MB comments http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=b7783f3cfce=16e07f16fe | read more http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=bbb9c33c3fe=16e07f16fe http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=4a28f939a5e=16e07f16fe http://batgap.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=0876ac1293e=16e07f16fe http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=3763bcea53e=16e07f16fe http://gallery.mailchimp.com/e709a491029b04e745834d34d/images/frond.gif Elsewhere * http://batgap.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=20ba1693c2e=16e07f16fe Visit My Blog * http://us2.forward-to-friend2.com/forward?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=c2f0127c84e=16e07f16fe Share This with a friend * http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=dcad27f536e=16e07f16fe Follow me on Twitter * http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=f0cf8c2424e=16e07f16fe RSS feed http://gallery.mailchimp.com/e709a491029b04e745834d34d/images/shim.gif Regular announcement of new interviews posted at http://batgap.com. Buddha at the Gas Pump 1108 South B Street Fairfield, Iowa 52556 Add us to your address book http://batgap.us2.list-manage1.com/vcard?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=b0e5d0d53a Copyright (C) 2013 Buddha at the Gas Pump All rights reserved. http://www.mailchimp.com/monkey-rewards/?utm_source=freemium_newsletterutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=monkey_rewardsaid=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5afl=1 http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/track/open.php?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5id=c2f0127c84e=16e07f16fe
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Judy, my MAIN purpose was to support Seraphita who so often posts cool stuff. All the rest is your projection of your shadow stuff, unresolved childhood stuff. IMO From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Share bleated: Seraphita, just so you know, I didn't ignore what you wrote. I skimmed and I forgot. But wrote a detailed response involving elaborate conjectures anyway. I'll tell you what I think your motivation was in writing the post. (It's just a guess, but you'll deny it even if it's correct.) I think your main purpose was to suggest that in asking how we knew what Bentov had been thinking, I had failed to consider the possibility that he had told his wife before boarding the plane. That attempted gotcha, I suspect, was uppermost in your mind as you wrote your response, and that's why you overlooked how Seraphita had described the incident. In any case, it's typical of your failure to think things through before you make your posts, your habit of making instant connections just in order to have something to say, without considering whether those connections make any sense. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:52 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura)?
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
turq, ah readability, ok that's penetrating my noggin just as Xeno's post did. Anyway, the thing about your mighty blasts in my direction, I've never felt that you were holding a grudge against me. For whatever reason, that's the difference that makes a huge difference for me. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:09 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: turq, so I guess the learning for me is how to balance that being transparent with what noozguru was calling having reserve. I'd call character the result of living our soul more and more. I'd say that's what both Emmylou and Willie do to a great extent. Thanks again for posting that. I think the point that you -- and the other poster consistently at the top of the Post Count list -- still don't get, and still aren't willing to take any responsibility for, is that living your soul causes you to make *twice as many posts* as anyone else on the forum. You both seem to react as if this is your right, and has no impact on anyone else, or on the overall readability of the group as a whole. THIS is what I was getting at in my STFU post. That and the constant need (on both sides) to defend yourselves against perceived affronts, and turn them into multi-post threads *that no one is inter- ested in except yourselves*. Just sayin'...
RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Ann, I agree that it's good to take responsibility. However, that does not include giving validity to the observations of those who I think are biased towards me because of my upsets with RWC. And that is what I think goes on even to this day with some of RWC's supporters, who yes, I think are loyal to him in an unhealthy and unbalanced way. Hey, your post reminded me quite a lot of how Emily used to write to me. From: awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard, like I said to Xeno, some RWC supporters are still mad at me for the upsets RWC and I had. Some are obsessed IMO and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy and unbalanced way. Hey Share, do you think I am obsessed and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way? If so, tell me why you think this. If I am not obsessed in a loyal and unhealthy way then what do you think would explain my difficulties with you at times? You have gotten oodles and oodles of feedback from lots of posters here - some who truly like you, some who do not and some who have pretended to like you. We all get feedback here, directly or indirectly, on how others see us and feel about our ideas. Some use sledgehammers and others use poetry to get their views across. What I would love to see is for you to simply take responsibility when it is appropriate to do that instead of 'blaming' everyone else using reasons like obsession or unhealthy or grudge-holding. I don't care how many hundreds of times you post a day, that is not the issue. What is important to me is your deflection, constantly, away from yourself of any real 'owning' of your less than positive, shall we say, actions and inferences. You either chalk these up to superficial causes like sugar or planetary influences or to other people's shortfalls. Get real Share, it feels good. From: Richard J. Williams punditster@... To: Richard J. Williams FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Does every message posted to this discussion group have to turn into an argument with you? Are you the new FFL moderator? Is it alright with you Judy, if I have a one minute conversation with Share - just one minute- without you butting in to start another fight. You'd think that after thirty posts on the Post Count thread, you'd have said all you need to. I mean, what does it say about you - it's only 8:00 AM and you already slammed three people today. LoL! Sometimes I get the feeling you want the posting limits reinstated. Go figure. On 10/2/2013 7:52 AM, authfriend@... wrote: Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura)?
Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Not even a secondary. As I said, that is your projection. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:30 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies OK, so it was your SECONDARY purpose to do a gotcha. Close enough. BTW, if you think Seraphita so often posts cool stuff, how come all you do is skim it? Especially when you then go on to make a detailed response? I agree with you that she posts cool stuff. But as far as I'm concerned, that makes her posts deserving of the respect of careful reading and a thoughtful response. YMMV (and obviously does). Judy, my MAIN purpose was to support Seraphita who so often posts cool stuff. All the rest is your projection of your shadow stuff, unresolved childhood stuff. IMO This is just a cheap shot. We all have shadow stuff and unresolved childhood stuff, but some of us (like you) have way more than others. You, for example, have a desperate need to be accepted, as well as a compulsion to get those who find your pandering unwholesome, for reasons you've told us about but that I won't spell out here. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Share bleated: Seraphita, just so you know, I didn't ignore what you wrote. I skimmed and I forgot. But wrote a detailed response involving elaborate conjectures anyway. I'll tell you what I think your motivation was in writing the post. (It's just a guess, but you'll deny it even if it's correct.) I think your main purpose was to suggest that in asking how we knew what Bentov had been thinking, I had failed to consider the possibility that he had told his wife before boarding the plane. That attempted gotcha, I suspect, was uppermost in your mind as you wrote your response, and that's why you overlooked how Seraphita had described the incident. In any case, it's typical of your failure to think things through before you make your posts, your habit of making instant connections just in order to have something to say, without considering whether those connections make any sense. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:52 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura)?
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Judy, I can live with your not believing me about anything. And I see you're still trying to poison the well with your comment about respecting Seraphita's posts. I skim because I'm rushing in the morning. And so what if I have more stuff than others? So what? From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies I don't believe you, Share. And I notice you didn't respond to what I asked you. Not even a secondary. As I said, that is your projection. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:30 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies OK, so it was your SECONDARY purpose to do a gotcha. Close enough. BTW, if you think Seraphita so often posts cool stuff, how come all you do is skim it? Especially when you then go on to make a detailed response? I agree with you that she posts cool stuff. But as far as I'm concerned, that makes her posts deserving of the respect of careful reading and a thoughtful response. YMMV (and obviously does). Judy, my MAIN purpose was to support Seraphita who so often posts cool stuff. All the rest is your projection of your shadow stuff, unresolved childhood stuff. IMO This is just a cheap shot. We all have shadow stuff and unresolved childhood stuff, but some of us (like you) have way more than others. You, for example, have a desperate need to be accepted, as well as a compulsion to get those who find your pandering unwholesome, for reasons you've told us about but that I won't spell out here. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Share bleated: Seraphita, just so you know, I didn't ignore what you wrote. I skimmed and I forgot. But wrote a detailed response involving elaborate conjectures anyway. I'll tell you what I think your motivation was in writing the post. (It's just a guess, but you'll deny it even if it's correct.) I think your main purpose was to suggest that in asking how we knew what Bentov had been thinking, I had failed to consider the possibility that he had told his wife before boarding the plane. That attempted gotcha, I suspect, was uppermost in your mind as you wrote your response, and that's why you overlooked how Seraphita had described the incident. In any case, it's typical of your failure to think things through before you make your posts, your habit of making instant connections just in order to have something to say, without considering whether those connections make any sense. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:52 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura)?
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia
Continued offenses?! Ok, Judge Dudy, now that makes me smile! From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia Actually, grudge-holding is one of Barry's little fantasies designed to dismiss legitimate criticism while blaming the critic (otherwise known as shooting the messenger). As I've pointed out before, to criticize continued offenses is not an indication of grudge-holding (against either Barry or yourself). ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: turq, ah readability, ok that's penetrating my noggin just as Xeno's post did. Anyway, the thing about your mighty blasts in my direction, I've never felt that you were holding a grudge against me. For whatever reason, that's the difference that makes a huge difference for me. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:09 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: turq, so I guess the learning for me is how to balance that being transparent with what noozguru was calling having reserve. I'd call character the result of living our soul more and more. I'd say that's what both Emmylou and Willie do to a great extent. Thanks again for posting that. I think the point that you -- and the other poster consistently at the top of the Post Count list -- still don't get, and still aren't willing to take any responsibility for, is that living your soul causes you to make *twice as many posts* as anyone else on the forum. You both seem to react as if this is your right, and has no impact on anyone else, or on the overall readability of the group as a whole. THIS is what I was getting at in my STFU post. That and the constant need (on both sides) to defend yourselves against perceived affronts, and turn them into multi-post threads *that no one is inter- ested in except yourselves*. Just sayin'...
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia (musings about outlaws)
Very cool, turq, but about Rule #4, yeah maybe Star Wars isn't cute overall, but you gotta admit that those Ewoks of Endor were pretty darn cute. As well as being good fighters. And who doesn't think R2D2 wasn't cute sometimes?! From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 4:31 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cafe Nostalgia (musings about outlaws) Here's a related (at least in my mind) treat. It's a marvelously creative animated open letter to J. J. Abrams telling him how not to screw up the future movies in the Star Wars franchise the way he and others have screwed them up in the past. And the rules these fans propose are both brilliant and right on. Star Wars is a Western, and it's about outlaws just gettin' by out on the frontier. Mess that up, and you mess up the whole concept. http://io9.com/a-beautifully-animated-open-letter-to-j-j-abrams-about-1397273170 Following these simple rules is what made Star Wars work originally, and it's what made Firefly work. Heck, these rules were even what made the original Japanese film that Star Wars ripped off (The Hidden Fortress) work; that was an outlaw story, too. Mess with outlaws at your peril... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote: that's excellent tho I prefer the Willie Nelson version Willie actually got the song from Emmylou, not from Townes Van Zandt directly, and then recorded it in a very popular version with Merle Haggard. He tells the story of that discovery (and performs the song with Emmylou) here. Their version was excellent, partly because both Willie and Merle are such outlaws themselves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uIUe8iQPM0 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cafe Nostalgia It was probably the use of Marty Robbins' El Paso in the final episode of Breaking Bad that got me thinking about it, but ever since I've been on kind of a music kick, finding and listening to classic outlaw songs. El Paso is obviously one of the greats in that category, but it's another old outlaw song that's stuck in my head tonight, and it's even brought back some pleasant memories about my time in the TM movement, so I'll share them with you. Back in early 1977, when I first heard the song, I was living at the TM National Headquarters at the end of Sunset Blvd. I was working there as personnel director for a few months before my Sidhis course, and lived on the premises in one of the rooms (it was formerly a motel, for those of you who never went there). It was a cool place to live -- a block from the beach, next door to the Yogananda Lake Shrine -- and even though I was making shit money I was earning precious (at the time) course credits, so I made the best of living there. It was there I first heard Emmylou Harris' version of a great Townes Van Sandt outlaw song called Pancho and Lefty. I remember listening to it one night with my girlfriend, who I had had to sneak into my room, the both of us feeling very much like outlaws ourselves for having sex there in the TM National Headquarters. :-) Anyway, it's a great song, and listening to it again in a Paris cafe -- all these years later -- I still love it. I also love -- all these years later -- still feeling like an outlaw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3LQeRqTBK4
Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
The nastier an RWC supporter is towards me, and yesterday's posts to Seraphita were IMO some of the nastiest ever, the more I think they are loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:03 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Notice that Share didn't respond to Ann's request for her to say why she thinks Ann is obsessed and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way. Share is grasping at straws with this RWC business. If she can pin the criticisms of herself to her upsets with Robin last year, it enables her to maintain (falsely) that nothing she has done since has deserved criticism. But then--opsie!--there's Barry's SHUT THE FUCK UP post to Share of mid-August. Unfortunately that can't be pinned to Share's disgraceful treatment of Robin last year, given Barry's obvious loathing of the man. Bottom line, to try to blame that incident for the criticism of Share a year later (and regularly in between) is exactly what Ann is talking about when she points to how Share consistently avoids taking responsibility for her behavior, instead seeking to put the blame on her critics (or other innocuous incidentals like too much sugar). Ann, I agree that it's good to take responsibility. However, that does not include giving validity to the observations of those who I think are biased towards me because of my upsets with RWC. And that is what I think goes on even to this day with some of RWC's supporters, who yes, I think are loyal to him in an unhealthy and unbalanced way. Hey, your post reminded me quite a lot of how Emily used to write to me. From: awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard, like I said to Xeno, some RWC supporters are still mad at me for the upsets RWC and I had. Some are obsessed IMO and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy and unbalanced way. Hey Share, do you think I am obsessed and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way? If so, tell me why you think this. If I am not obsessed in a loyal and unhealthy way then what do you think would explain my difficulties with you at times? You have gotten oodles and oodles of feedback from lots of posters here - some who truly like you, some who do not and some who have pretended to like you. We all get feedback here, directly or indirectly, on how others see us and feel about our ideas. Some use sledgehammers and others use poetry to get their views across. What I would love to see is for you to simply take responsibility when it is appropriate to do that instead of 'blaming' everyone else using reasons like obsession or unhealthy or grudge-holding. I don't care how many hundreds of times you post a day, that is not the issue. What is important to me is your deflection, constantly, away from yourself of any real 'owning' of your less than positive, shall we say, actions and inferences. You either chalk these up to superficial causes like sugar or planetary influences or to other people's shortfalls. Get real Share, it feels good. From: Richard J. Williams punditster@... To: Richard J. Williams FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Does every message posted to this discussion group have to turn into an argument with you? Are you the new FFL moderator? Is it alright with you Judy, if I have a one minute conversation with Share - just one minute- without you butting in to start another fight. You'd think that after thirty posts on the Post Count thread, you'd have said all you need to. I mean, what does it say about you - it's only 8:00 AM and you already slammed three people today. LoL! Sometimes I get the feeling you want the posting limits reinstated. Go figure. On 10/2/2013 7:52 AM, authfriend@... wrote: Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one on the plane had an aura)?
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
But I have to ask: why do they continue to be SO upset about it. Where is Dr. Pete when we need him? You have to realize Share, is that this is probably about as close as it gets to spiritual practice for some of the informants posting here. Not everyone has the opportunity to engage in spiritual pursuits anymore. These days, the spiritual program gets almost eliminated entirely, except for posting messages to an online chat site like Yahoo FFL. Go figure. That's just about it - a few one liners posted to the top or the bottom of a spiritual discussion group before, during or after work. Obviously they couldn't be practicing yoga, meditating, or even doing much work if they're already tuned in to the internet by 8:00 AM and posting at their place of their employ. Go figure. Also, you need to realize that not everyone has is able to meditate in a dome every day and to associate with people that practice the same kind of meditation we do. You are very fortunate to be living close to a spiritual meditation hall, If you're living out in the back of beyond on the road to Erewhon, you probably couldn't even find a GNC health food store in a shopping center strip mall. If you lived in a big city like up in Boise or Rapid City, you could at least visit a Whole Foods Market. Otherwise about all you can do is take a walk in the woods or look up at the sky at night and admire the stars. From what I've read here, most of the respondents don't live within a thousand miles of a golden dome of pure knowledge, a Buddhist stupa, a yoga ashram. or even a yoga studio down town. Is there anyone here that can hold a yoga pose? Maybe they are jus jellos. Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to. So in a way, we are helping people all the time just by being on the spiritual path and posting to FFL, top or bottom. LoL! On 10/2/2013 6:46 AM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, just using simple logic, I'd speculate that a fully perceptive person would label me as being like everyone else, a mix of developed and undeveloped aspects; that my basic motive is the same basic motive that propels all humans, to live more fully. My question is how would a fully perceptive person behave given that we're all in this together. There is a phenomenon in psychology called the Anniversary Effect or the Anniversary Reaction. It can be conscious or unconscious. Yesterday was the one year anniversary of my accusing RWC of pr. My guess is that RWC's supporters were consciously or unconsciously reacting to what was an upsetting event for them. But I have to ask: why do they continue to be SO upset about it. My conclusion is unresolved issues from childhood are at work. AND, projecting a lot of their shadow about RWC onto me. Otherwise they would have moved on from this dynamic long ago. IMO. *From:* anartax...@yahoo.com anartax...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:03 PM *Subject:* RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC AUTHFRIEND WROTE: Share's true motives have been evident to halfway-perceptive people for a long time, actually. Unfortunately that doesn't include Share (or Steve, for that matter). It isn't Seraphita's fault that she hasn't seen the full picture yet; she hasn't been here as a regular for long enough. The question that could be asked here is, what would be evident to fully-perceptive people in this same situation, now that you halfway-perceptives have nailed Share's true motives? [Note: prevaricators' intrusions into my point here, under the guise of 'comments', is ill advised for integrity reasons]
Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
So, now it's all about Share. This has got to be some kind of FFL record - it only took an hour for this thread to head down hill. Go figure. On 10/2/2013 10:22 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard, like I said to Xeno, some RWC supporters are still mad at me for the upsets RWC and I had. Some are obsessed IMO and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy and unbalanced way. Hey Share, do you think I am obsessed and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way? If so, tell me why you think this. If I am not obsessed in a loyal and unhealthy way then what do you think would explain my difficulties with you at times? You have gotten oodles and oodles of feedback from lots of posters here - some who truly like you, some who do not and some who have pretended to like you. We all get feedback here, directly or indirectly, on how others see us and feel about our ideas. Some use sledgehammers and others use poetry to get their views across. What I would love to see is for you to simply take responsibility when it is appropriate to do that instead of 'blaming' everyone else using reasons like obsession or unhealthy or grudge-holding. I don't care how many hundreds of times you post a day, that is not the issue. What is important to me is your deflection, constantly, away from yourself of any real 'owning' of your less than positive, shall we say, actions and inferences. You either chalk these up to superficial causes like sugar or planetary influences or to other people's shortfalls. Get real Share, it feels good. *From:* Richard J. Williams punditster@... *To:* Richard J. Williams FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Wednesday, October 2, 2013 8:20 AM *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Does every message posted to this discussion group have to turn into an argument with you? Are you the new FFL moderator? Is it alright with you Judy, if I have a one minute conversation with Share - just one minute- without you butting in to start another fight. You'd think that after thirty posts on the Post Count thread, you'd have said all you need to. I mean, what does it say about you - it's only 8:00 AM and you already slammed three people today. LoL! Sometimes I get the feeling you want the posting limits reinstated. Go figure. On 10/2/2013 7:52 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (*as he was boarding* American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one *on the plane* had an aura)? .
RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Pirates, Outlaws and Superheroes, for metrosexuals
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Judy, your parroting some of what Xeno and turq have said to me does not make your observations or suggestions more valid to me. IMO they are coming from a more neutral place with regards to me. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:31 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies You obviously had time to write a detailed response to the post of Seraphita's you say you just skimmed because you were rushing, Share, so that claim doesn't hold much water. As to your having more stuff than others, it's what compels you to spew umpty posts with almost no content, including your pandering posts and your feeble attempts at gotcha posts, as well as your inability to take responsibility for your behavior. Suggestion: If you must read FFL before you bop off to the domes (hardly, I should think, a good preparation for settling down to experience silence), save your responses for when you get back and are no longer in a rush, so you have time to put some thought into them (and read what you're responding to with sustained attention). That's a good prescription for whatever the time of day is, BTW. You really do not need to post every stray thought that enters your mind. In fact, you'll get more of the attention and approval you so crave, and less of the criticism you so fear, if you make fewer, better posts. Also, most of us don't feel the need to proffer extravagant thanks for every post we appreciate, nor do the folks who make such posts expect it. Save the accolades for the really good ones, maybe the best one of the day after you've read them all. Then perhaps your appreciation will count for something. There are many other ways you could mitigate the negative effects on FFL of your excess of stuff, but the above will do for now. Judy, I can live with your not believing me about anything. And I see you're still trying to poison the well with your comment about respecting Seraphita's posts. I skim because I'm rushing in the morning. And so what if I have more stuff than others? So what? From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies I don't believe you, Share. And I notice you didn't respond to what I asked you. Not even a secondary. As I said, that is your projection. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:30 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies OK, so it was your SECONDARY purpose to do a gotcha. Close enough. BTW, if you think Seraphita so often posts cool stuff, how come all you do is skim it? Especially when you then go on to make a detailed response? I agree with you that she posts cool stuff. But as far as I'm concerned, that makes her posts deserving of the respect of careful reading and a thoughtful response. YMMV (and obviously does). Judy, my MAIN purpose was to support Seraphita who so often posts cool stuff. All the rest is your projection of your shadow stuff, unresolved childhood stuff. IMO This is just a cheap shot. We all have shadow stuff and unresolved childhood stuff, but some of us (like you) have way more than others. You, for example, have a desperate need to be accepted, as well as a compulsion to get those who find your pandering unwholesome, for reasons you've told us about but that I won't spell out here. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 9:51 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Share bleated: Seraphita, just so you know, I didn't ignore what you wrote. I skimmed and I forgot. But wrote a detailed response involving elaborate conjectures anyway. I'll tell you what I think your motivation was in writing the post. (It's just a guess, but you'll deny it even if it's correct.) I think your main purpose was to suggest that in asking how we knew what Bentov had been thinking, I had failed to consider the possibility that he had told his wife before boarding the plane. That attempted gotcha, I suspect, was uppermost in your mind as you wrote your response, and that's why you overlooked how Seraphita had described the incident. In any case, it's typical of your failure to think things through before you make your posts, your habit of making instant connections just in order to have something to say, without considering whether those connections make any sense. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To:
RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
Richard, Dr. Pete is wisely staying away. As for me, I'm helping with autumn Dome cleaning this afternoon. Just for fun, go figure (-: From: Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com To: Richard J. Williams FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:36 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC But I have to ask: why do they continue to be SO upset about it. Where is Dr. Pete when we need him? You have to realize Share, is that this is probably about as close as it gets to spiritual practice for some of the informants posting here. Not everyone has the opportunity to engage in spiritual pursuits anymore. These days, the spiritual program gets almost eliminated entirely, except for posting messages to an online chat site like Yahoo FFL. Go figure. That's just about it - a few one liners posted to the top or the bottom of a spiritual discussion group before, during or after work. Obviously they couldn't be practicing yoga, meditating, or even doing much work if they're already tuned in to the internet by 8:00 AM and posting at their place of their employ. Go figure. Also, you need to realize that not everyone has is able to meditate in a dome every day and to associate with people that practice the same kind of meditation we do. You are very fortunate to be living close to a spiritual meditation hall, If you're living out in the back of beyond on the road to Erewhon, you probably couldn't even find a GNC health food store in a shopping center strip mall. If you lived in a big city like up in Boise or Rapid City, you could at least visit a Whole Foods Market. Otherwise about all you can do is take a walk in the woods or look up at the sky at night and admire the stars. From what I've read here, most of the respondents don't live within a thousand miles of a golden dome of pure knowledge, a Buddhist stupa, a yoga ashram. or even a yoga studio down town. Is there anyone here that can hold a yoga pose? Maybe they are jus jellos. Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to. So in a way, we are helping people all the time just by being on the spiritual path and posting to FFL, top or bottom. LoL! On 10/2/2013 6:46 AM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, just using simple logic, I'd speculate that a fully perceptive person would label me as being like everyone else, a mix of developed and undeveloped aspects; that my basic motive is the same basic motive that propels all humans, to live more fully. My question is how would a fully perceptive person behave given that we're all in this together. There is a phenomenon in psychology called the Anniversary Effect or the Anniversary Reaction. It can be conscious or unconscious. Yesterday was the one year anniversary of my accusing RWC of pr. My guess is that RWC's supporters were consciously or unconsciously reacting to what was an upsetting event for them. But I have to ask: why do they continue to be SO upset about it. My conclusion is unresolved issues from childhood are at work. AND, projecting a lot of their shadow about RWC onto me. Otherwise they would have moved on from this dynamic long ago. IMO. From: anartax...@yahoo.com anartax...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:03 PM Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC AUTHFRIEND WROTE: Share's true motives have been evident to halfway-perceptive people for a long time, actually. Unfortunately that doesn't include Share (or Steve, for that matter). It isn't Seraphita's fault that she hasn't seen the full picture yet; she hasn't been here as a regular for long enough. The question that could be asked here is, what would be evident to fully-perceptive people in this same situation, now that you halfway-perceptives have nailed Share's true motives? [Note: prevaricators' intrusions into my point here, under the guise of 'comments', is ill advised for integrity reasons]
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Judy, I don't think the views of Xeno or turq or noozguru spring from the same prejudice towards me as yours do and therefore they are not similar at all. Except that you've parroted them. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 12:14 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Actually I haven't parroted anything they've said to you. Sorry, but what I wrote happens to be my own thoughts about you. But it's certainly interesting that all three of us have similar views, isn't it? Especially since we don't agree on much of anything else? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Judy, your parroting some of what Xeno and turq have said to me does not make your observations or suggestions more valid to me. IMO they are coming from a more neutral place with regards to me. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:31 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies You obviously had time to write a detailed response to the post of Seraphita's you say you just skimmed because you were rushing, Share, so that claim doesn't hold much water. As to your having more stuff than others, it's what compels you to spew umpty posts with almost no content, including your pandering posts and your feeble attempts at gotcha posts, as well as your inability to take responsibility for your behavior. Suggestion: If you must read FFL before you bop off to the domes (hardly, I should think, a good preparation for settling down to experience silence), save your responses for when you get back and are no longer in a rush, so you have time to put some thought into them (and read what you're responding to with sustained attention). That's a good prescription for whatever the time of day is, BTW. You really do not need to post every stray thought that enters your mind. In fact, you'll get more of the attention and approval you so crave, and less of the criticism you so fear, if you make fewer, better posts. Also, most of us don't feel the need to proffer extravagant thanks for every post we appreciate, nor do the folks who make such posts expect it. Save the accolades for the really good ones, maybe the best one of the day after you've read them all. Then perhaps your appreciation will count for something. There are many other ways you could mitigate the negative effects on FFL of your excess of stuff, but the above will do for now. Judy, I can live with your not believing me about anything. And I see you're still trying to poison the well with your comment about respecting Seraphita's posts. I skim because I'm rushing in the morning. And so what if I have more stuff than others? So what?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Maybe they are just JELLOS. It looks like this thread is going down the rabbit hole too. Go figure. On 10/2/2013 9:30 AM, Share Long wrote: Richard, like I said to Xeno, some RWC supporters are still mad at me for the upsets RWC and I had. Some are obsessed IMO and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy and unbalanced way. *From:* Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com *To:* Richard J. Williams FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Wednesday, October 2, 2013 8:20 AM *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Does every message posted to this discussion group have to turn into an argument with you? Are you the new FFL moderator? Is it alright with you Judy, if I have a one minute conversation with Share - just one minute- without you butting in to start another fight. You'd think that after thirty posts on the Post Count thread, you'd have said all you need to. I mean, what does it say about you - it's only 8:00 AM and you already slammed three people today. LoL! Sometimes I get the feeling you want the posting limits reinstated. Go figure. On 10/2/2013 7:52 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Share wrote: (snip) Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov. Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area before boarding and then told his wife. Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that you ignored what she wrote (*as he was boarding* American Airlines Flight 191 he realised that no one *on the plane* had an aura)?
RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
[FairfieldLife] Does this Guy Look Like Frank Sinatra or What?
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
[FairfieldLife] One Outlaw's View Of The Laws Of Nature
I know that some have a kind of reverence for the Laws Of Nature. They tend to view them *as* Laws, and so sacrosanct that Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. I don't see them that way. I see them the same way I see the laws of men. That is, as a conceptual framework, within which to exercise one's free will. That's the way physical, lawbreakin' outlaws view the laws of men. They know they're there, and that there may be consequences for violating them, but they're willing to bet on that may be. They exercise their free will, roll the dice, and see what happens. As we can all tell just by looking at the headlines and around us in daily life, the Bad Things that will supposed;y occur if people break the laws of men don't always happen. At least within the outlaw's lifetime, which is the only one we know fersure exists. So some of the outlaws who broke the law skate away Scot-free. They rolled the dice and won, at least from a being-punished-for-violating-the-laws-of-men point of view. Looking back on my life, I've heard a LOT about the supposed higher-level Laws Of Nature, and how Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. Such beliefs are legion in the TMO, and in many other spiritual trips. It is not hyperbole to suggest that *many* people on this planet 1) are convinced that these Laws Of Nature exist, and 2) are convinced that they 'know' what these Laws Of Nature are. Me, I'm convinced of neither. As to whether a fixed and universal set of Laws Of Nature exist, I am an agnostic. As to whether *anyone* on this planet 'knows' what the Laws Of Nature actually *are* if they do exist, I am an atheist. And so I've always lived my life as an outlaw. I roll the dice. Sure, I pay heed to a few of the things that those who claim to 'know' would call Laws Of Nature, as applied to human behavior. I try not to kill people and shit like that. But many of the other things they claim are inviolable Laws Of Nature I roll the dice on. I trust my own intuition, and occasionally violate them. If the 'knowers' tell me, for example, that certain behaviors definitely violate the Laws Of Nature and would be Bad -- behaviors such as being gay, not meditating, thinking or speaking ill of a guru, or entering a building from the wrong direction -- I'm more likely to treat them as the crazy people they are, rather than pay heed to their warnings. I ignore them completely and make my own decisions. In doing this, I am willing to bet on my intuition and my life experience and roll the dice. Is that Bad? :-) http://digboston.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Eagles-Desperado.jpg http://digboston.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Eagles-Desperado.jpg
[FairfieldLife] RE: One Outlaw#39;s View Of The Laws Of Nature
RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
[FairfieldLife] FBI arrests Silk Road suspect
[FairfieldLife] RE: FBI arrests Silk Road suspect
RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
[FairfieldLife] RE: One Outlaw#39;s View Of The Laws Of Nature
[FairfieldLife] RE: FBI arrests Silk Road suspect
[FairfieldLife] RE: One Outlaw#39;s View Of The Laws Of Nature
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: One Outlaw#39;s View Of The Laws Of Nature
It's probably only a law of nature from which all other laws spring. Explained to simple people with the concept of God which of course became perverted into all kinds of nonsense. It's like the overtone series from a fundamental tone on a bass string. Or just think of it as fractals which means we're all just fractals. :-D On 10/02/2013 11:16 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com wrote: Barry, Some times we wonder if you think before you type your ideas on the computer. Isn't there a law of nature that governs the structure of the atom and the subparticles that are contained within which cannot be seen by human eyes? If you split the atom, as in violating the law of nature, you get a big explosion like the atomic bomb that was dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: I know that some have a kind of reverence for the Laws Of Nature. They tend to view them *as* Laws, and so sacrosanct that Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. I don't see them that way. I see them the same way I see the laws of men. That is, as a conceptual framework, within which to exercise one's free will. That's the way physical, lawbreakin' outlaws view the laws of men. They know they're there, and that there may be consequences for violating them, but they're willing to bet on that may be. They exercise their free will, roll the dice, and see what happens. As we can all tell just by looking at the headlines and around us in daily life, the Bad Things that will supposed;y occur if people break the laws of men don't always happen. At least within the outlaw's lifetime, which is the only one we know fersure exists. So some of the outlaws who broke the law skate away Scot-free. They rolled the dice and won, at least from a being-punished-for-violating-the-laws-of-men point of view. Looking back on my life, I've heard a LOT about the supposed higher-level Laws Of Nature, and how Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. Such beliefs are legion in the TMO, and in many other spiritual trips. It is not hyperbole to suggest that *many* people on this planet 1) are convinced that these Laws Of Nature exist, and 2) are convinced that they 'know' what these Laws Of Nature are. Me, I'm convinced of neither. As to whether a fixed and universal set of Laws Of Nature exist, I am an agnostic. As to whether *anyone* on this planet 'knows' what the Laws Of Nature actually *are* if they do exist, I am an atheist. And so I've always lived my life as an outlaw. I roll the dice. Sure, I pay heed to a few of the things that those who claim to 'know' would call Laws Of Nature, as applied to human behavior. I try not to kill people and shit like that. But many of the other things they claim are inviolable Laws Of Nature I roll the dice on. I trust my own intuition, and occasionally violate them. If the 'knowers' tell me, for example, that certain behaviors definitely violate the Laws Of Nature and would be Bad -- behaviors such as being gay, not meditating, thinking or speaking ill of a guru, or entering a building from the wrong direction -- I'm more likely to treat them as the crazy people they are, rather than pay heed to their warnings. I ignore them completely and make my own decisions. In doing this, I am willing to bet on my intuition and my life experience and roll the dice. Is that Bad? :-) http://digboston.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Eagles-Desperado.jpg
[FairfieldLife] RE: Does this Guy Look Like Frank Sinatra or What?
Re: [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw's View Of The Laws Of Nature
Whut about them fellers who sold pot to git enuff munny to git to TTC, then slipped, fell and got a broke laig when they wuz gittin' on tha plane? Seems like I heard something about not speaking ill of the guru - oh lawdy mercy! I am in for some bad karmy for sayin' Marshy wuz an Old Goat, among other things. But one would assume the guru would have to be enlightened, ergo, to be a real and true guru for that kinder thang to happen. Not one who lied, took money under false pretenses and manipulated folks to a fair-thee-well among other enormities. But if the guru was actually enlightened, then they, being manifestations of the Absolute, wouldn't be affected by what anyone said about them, nor would they care, so I'm good either way. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 2:04 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw's View Of The Laws Of Nature I know that some have a kind of reverence for the Laws Of Nature. They tend to view them *as* Laws, and so sacrosanct that Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. I don't see them that way. I see them the same way I see the laws of men. That is, as a conceptual framework, within which to exercise one's free will. That's the way physical, lawbreakin' outlaws view the laws of men. They know they're there, and that there may be consequences for violating them, but they're willing to bet on that may be. They exercise their free will, roll the dice, and see what happens. As we can all tell just by looking at the headlines and around us in daily life, the Bad Things that will supposed;y occur if people break the laws of men don't always happen. At least within the outlaw's lifetime, which is the only one we know fersure exists. So some of the outlaws who broke the law skate away Scot-free. They rolled the dice and won, at least from a being-punished-for-violating-the-laws-of-men point of view. Looking back on my life, I've heard a LOT about the supposed higher-level Laws Of Nature, and how Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. Such beliefs are legion in the TMO, and in many other spiritual trips. It is not hyperbole to suggest that *many* people on this planet 1) are convinced that these Laws Of Nature exist, and 2) are convinced that they 'know' what these Laws Of Nature are. Me, I'm convinced of neither. As to whether a fixed and universal set of Laws Of Nature exist, I am an agnostic. As to whether *anyone* on this planet 'knows' what the Laws Of Nature actually *are* if they do exist, I am an atheist. And so I've always lived my life as an outlaw. I roll the dice. Sure, I pay heed to a few of the things that those who claim to 'know' would call Laws Of Nature, as applied to human behavior. I try not to kill people and shit like that. But many of the other things they claim are inviolable Laws Of Nature I roll the dice on. I trust my own intuition, and occasionally violate them. If the 'knowers' tell me, for example, that certain behaviors definitely violate the Laws Of Nature and would be Bad -- behaviors such as being gay, not meditating, thinking or speaking ill of a guru, or entering a building from the wrong direction -- I'm more likely to treat them as the crazy people they are, rather than pay heed to their warnings. I ignore them completely and make my own decisions. In doing this, I am willing to bet on my intuition and my life experience and roll the dice. Is that Bad? :-) http://digboston.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Eagles-Desperado.jpg
[FairfieldLife] RE: Does this Guy Look Like Frank Sinatra or What?
[FairfieldLife] RE: Does this Guy Look Like Frank Sinatra or What?
[FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw#39;s View Of The Laws Of Nature
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw#39;s View Of The Laws Of Nature
[FairfieldLife] RE: Does this Guy Look Like Frank Sinatra or What?
[FairfieldLife] RE: FBI arrests Silk Road suspect
[FairfieldLife] RE: FBI arrests Silk Road suspect
[FairfieldLife] The Big Bang Theory
Fresh off Bob Newhart’s Emmy win for the role, CBS’s “The Big Bang Theory” is bringing back Professor Proton. Plus, the geek meter goes off the charts with news of an upcoming guest turn by Bill Nye the Science Guy... 'Bob Newhart, Bill Nye to Guest as Science Rivals on ‘Big Bang Theory’ http://tv.yahoo.com/news/bob-newhart-bill-nye-guest-science-rivals-big-175413307.html To subscribe, send a message to: fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: fairfieldlife-dig...@yahoogroups.com fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: fairfieldlife-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
[FairfieldLife] RE: The Future is Clear
Re: [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw's View Of The Laws Of Nature
Is this the point where you fink on the pot sellers? Go figure. On 10/2/2013 2:31 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: Whut about them fellers who sold pot to git enuff munny to git to TTC, then slipped, fell and got a broke laig when they wuz gittin' on tha plane? Seems like I heard something about not speaking ill of the guru - oh lawdy mercy! I am in for some bad karmy for sayin' Marshy wuz an Old Goat, among other things. But one would assume the guru would have to be enlightened, ergo, to be a real and true guru for that kinder thang to happen. Not one who lied, took money under false pretenses and manipulated folks to a fair-thee-well among other enormities. But if the guru was actually enlightened, then they, being manifestations of the Absolute, wouldn't be affected by what anyone said about them, nor would they care, so I'm good either way. *From:* turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Wednesday, October 2, 2013 2:04 PM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw's View Of The Laws Of Nature I know that some have a kind of reverence for the Laws Of Nature. They tend to view them *as* Laws, and so sacrosanct that Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. I don't see them that way. I see them the same way I see the laws of men. That is, as a conceptual framework, within which to exercise one's free will. That's the way physical, lawbreakin' outlaws view the laws of men. They know they're there, and that there may be consequences for violating them, but they're willing to bet on that may be. They exercise their free will, roll the dice, and see what happens. As we can all tell just by looking at the headlines and around us in daily life, the Bad Things that will supposed;y occur if people break the laws of men don't always happen. At least within the outlaw's lifetime, which is the only one we know fersure exists. So some of the outlaws who broke the law skate away Scot-free. They rolled the dice and won, at least from a being-punished-for-violating-the-laws-of-men point of view. Looking back on my life, I've heard a LOT about the supposed higher-level Laws Of Nature, and how Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. Such beliefs are legion in the TMO, and in many other spiritual trips. It is not hyperbole to suggest that *many* people on this planet 1) are convinced that these Laws Of Nature exist, and 2) are convinced that they 'know' what these Laws Of Nature are. Me, I'm convinced of neither. As to whether a fixed and universal set of Laws Of Nature exist, I am an agnostic. As to whether *anyone* on this planet 'knows' what the Laws Of Nature actually *are* if they do exist, I am an atheist. And so I've always lived my life as an outlaw. I roll the dice. Sure, I pay heed to a few of the things that those who claim to 'know' would call Laws Of Nature, as applied to human behavior. I try not to kill people and shit like that. But many of the other things they claim are inviolable Laws Of Nature I roll the dice on. I trust my own intuition, and occasionally violate them. If the 'knowers' tell me, for example, that certain behaviors definitely violate the Laws Of Nature and would be Bad -- behaviors such as being gay, not meditating, thinking or speaking ill of a guru, or entering a building from the wrong direction -- I'm more likely to treat them as the crazy people they are, rather than pay heed to their warnings. I ignore them completely and make my own decisions. In doing this, I am willing to bet on my intuition and my life experience and roll the dice. Is that Bad? :-) http://digboston.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Eagles-Desperado.jpg
Re: [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw's View Of The Laws Of Nature
I don't know who that happened to - but my initiator used to tell the story to illustrate what happens with karma From: Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com To: Richard J. Williams FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:53 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw's View Of The Laws Of Nature Is this the point where you fink on the pot sellers? Go figure. On 10/2/2013 2:31 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: Whut about them fellers who sold pot to git enuff munny to git to TTC, then slipped, fell and got a broke laig when they wuz gittin' on tha plane? Seems like I heard something about not speaking ill of the guru - oh lawdy mercy! I am in for some bad karmy for sayin' Marshy wuz an Old Goat, among other things. But one would assume the guru would have to be enlightened, ergo, to be a real and true guru for that kinder thang to happen. Not one who lied, took money under false pretenses and manipulated folks to a fair-thee-well among other enormities. But if the guru was actually enlightened, then they, being manifestations of the Absolute, wouldn't be affected by what anyone said about them, nor would they care, so I'm good either way. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 2:04 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Outlaw's View Of The Laws Of Nature I know that some have a kind of reverence for the Laws Of Nature. They tend to view them *as* Laws, and so sacrosanct that Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. I don't see them that way. I see them the same way I see the laws of men. That is, as a conceptual framework, within which to exercise one's free will. That's the way physical, lawbreakin' outlaws view the laws of men. They know they're there, and that there may be consequences for violating them, but they're willing to bet on that may be. They exercise their free will, roll the dice, and see what happens. As we can all tell just by looking at the headlines and around us in daily life, the Bad Things that will supposed;y occur if people break the laws of men don't always happen. At least within the outlaw's lifetime, which is the only one we know fersure exists. So some of the outlaws who broke the law skate away Scot-free. They rolled the dice and won, at least from a being-punished-for-violating-the-laws-of-men point of view. Looking back on my life, I've heard a LOT about the supposed higher-level Laws Of Nature, and how Bad Things Will Happen To You If You Violate Them. Such beliefs are legion in the TMO, and in many other spiritual trips. It is not hyperbole to suggest that *many* people on this planet 1) are convinced that these Laws Of Nature exist, and 2) are convinced that they 'know' what these Laws Of Nature are. Me, I'm convinced of neither. As to whether a fixed and universal set of Laws Of Nature exist, I am an agnostic. As to whether *anyone* on this planet 'knows' what the Laws Of Nature actually *are* if they do exist, I am an atheist. And so I've always lived my life as an outlaw. I roll the dice. Sure, I pay heed to a few of the things that those who claim to 'know' would call Laws Of Nature, as applied to human behavior. I try not to kill people and shit like that. But many of the other things they claim are inviolable Laws Of Nature I roll the dice on. I trust my own intuition, and
[FairfieldLife] Post Count Thu 03-Oct-13 00:15:11 UTC
Fairfield Life Post Counter === Start Date (UTC): 09/28/13 00:00:00 End Date (UTC): 10/05/13 00:00:00 458 messages as of (UTC) 10/03/13 00:09:38 68 authfriend 67 Share Long 33 awoelflebater 29 doctordumbass 29 Bhairitu 28 s3raphita 28 Richard J. Williams 27 turquoiseb 27 Michael Jackson 26 Steve Sundur 24 dhamiltony2k5 12 jr_esq 12 emptybill 8 Mike Dixon 7 cardemaister 5 j_alexander_stanley 5 anartaxius 4 emilymae.reyn 4 Duveyoung 3 punditster 3 Dick Mays 2 feste37 1 srijau 1 m2smart4u2000 1 WLeed3 1 Rick Archer 1 Paulo Barbosa 1 FairfieldLife 1 Ann Woelfle Bater Posters: 29 Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times = Daylight Saving Time (Summer): US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM Standard Time (Winter): US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com
[FairfieldLife] RE: Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
[FairfieldLife] RE: #39;Low Earth Orbit#39; music video, liner notes
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Not so fast - I knew a number of TM burnouts in Fairfield years ago. From: s3raph...@yahoo.com s3raph...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:57 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Re Itzhak Bentov's appendix to Stalking the Wild Pendulum: he talks here of what he called Physio-Kundalini Syndrome. He was concerned about unusual physiological occurrences when people practised long periods of meditation. And - you guessed it - many of Bentov's case studies were practitioners of transcendental meditation. Bentov said: strong and unusual bodily reactions and unusual psychological states might develop. He gives some quite scary examples of what happened to some people after many years doing TM. He realised that there was a danger someone reporting kundalini-symptoms wouldn't be understood by regular doctors. Imagine turning up at your local clinic and saying: Well doc, my guru taught me to spend an hour a day imagining that I was feeling sensations running up my spine and to think of a white ball of light above my head . . . (Yes, I know that's not TM but it is the sort of thing that is taught on the new-age circuit.) Any western doctor could only think in terms of psycho-somatic illness, but an Indian doctor would recognise that we are talking about a case of kundalini blow-out such as regularly occurs on the subcontinent. Stanislav Grof used the termspiritual emergency to refer to this and related problems that cropped up on the spiritual circuit and even set up a helpline at one stage to provide immediate help for those who were suffering. A noble undertaking, I say. Of course, if issues like this were at all common we would expect to see Fairfield, Iowa, populated by the walking dead - burnt-out zombies not able to relate to the common man. The fact that isn't the case (?) suggests that those who end up at Fairfield have been through a filtering process that has weeded out those susceptible to the syndrome. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: Thanks, Em! Glad you enjoyed the vid. Well, back to being shallow and empty headed! :-) Its more work than you'd think... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: LOL. I enjoyed your utube video and liked the track the best of all yours thus far. Have an excellent day Doc. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: LOL - I am the same way as the couple, only I am really good at faking it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHFxZrhj5-Q ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: The nastier an RWC supporter is towards me, and yesterday's posts to Seraphita were IMO some of the nastiest ever, the more I think they are loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:03 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies Notice that Share didn't respond to Ann's request for her to say why she thinks Ann is obsessed and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way. Share is grasping at straws with this RWC business. If she can pin the criticisms of herself to her upsets with Robin last year, it enables her to maintain (falsely) that nothing she has done since has deserved criticism. But then--opsie!--there's Barry's SHUT THE FUCK UP post to Share of mid-August. Unfortunately that can't be pinned to Share's disgraceful treatment of Robin last year, given Barry's obvious loathing of the man. Bottom line, to try to blame that incident for the criticism of Share a year later (and regularly in between) is exactly what Ann is talking about when she points to how Share consistently avoids taking responsibility for her behavior, instead seeking to put the blame on her critics (or other innocuous incidentals like too much sugar). Ann, I agree that it's good to take responsibility. However, that does not include giving validity to the observations of those who I think are biased towards me because of my upsets with RWC. And that is what I think goes on even to this day with some of RWC's supporters, who yes, I think are loyal to him in an unhealthy and unbalanced way. Hey, your post reminded me quite a lot of how Emily used to write to me. From: awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard, like I said to Xeno, some RWC supporters are still mad at me for the upsets