[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

But not destroyed by the FBI, contrary to what you were implying. 

 Also, we don't know that Clinton "had her aide" do it. Whoever did it may have 
done it on his own initiative after everything on the devices had been 
transferred to the one she was currently using. (She only used one BlackBerry 
at a time, as you know.)
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, Hillary Clinton had her aide smash two of her 
non-government issued Blackberry phones with a hammer. Apparently no records 
were kept of these events and nobody knows what happened to the parts.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As you know--according to what you've read--two devices were destroyed, those 
of Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and former aide Heather Samuelson. We don't know 
whether records of their destruction were maintained; most likely they were, 
since their destruction, as you know, was part of an immunity deal negotiated 
by the lawyer for the two aides. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, some of the digital devices used by Clinton, 
Abaden and thier staff were destroyed using hammers. How many, nobody seems to 
know. Maybe they just took the phones and iPads out back to the alley at night 
and smashed them. 

Apparently no records of their destruction were maintained. They are just 
missing. Go figure.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As has been pointed out to you, the FBI has not destroyed the Abedin/Weiner 
devices.

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

According to what I've read, Hillary Clinton had her aide smash two of her 
non-government issued Blackberry phones with a hammer. Apparently no records 
were kept of these events and nobody knows what happened to the parts.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As you know--according to what you've read--two devices were destroyed, those 
of Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and former aide Heather Samuelson. We don't know 
whether records of their destruction were maintained; most likely they were, 
since their destruction, as you know, was part of an immunity deal negotiated 
by the lawyer for the two aides. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, some of the digital devices used by Clinton, 
Abaden and thier staff were destroyed using hammers. How many, nobody seems to 
know. Maybe they just took the phones and iPads out back to the alley at night 
and smashed them. 

Apparently no records of their destruction were maintained. They are just 
missing. Go figure.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As has been pointed out to you, the FBI has not destroyed the Abedin/Weiner 
devices.

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

Comey: "We have the court order and we have the laptop - now get to work on 
sorting that email database!"

McCabe: "Yes sir!"

Agent: "All 650,000!?"
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Right. However, we don't have the email database, now, do we? So we can't 
search through it, can we? 

 You misread something, obviously.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  Like it's not hard to search through an email database for keywords that 
would find emails that expose malfeasance.
 
 On 10/31/2016 01:11 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   No, Weiner wasn't sending emails via Clinton's server.
 
 
 650,000 emails over 10 years would be about 178 per day. We don't know how 
many of those were his and how many were hers, or how many were sent and how 
many received. But Weiner was a congressman, and then ran for mayor of NYC, so 
it's to be expected that a lot of emails would go through his account every 
day. And we have no idea whether any of them were sexts.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone as 
devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive and mailed 
them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when Comey makes the FBI 
transcript of the Weiner interview public after the investigation is completed. 
 
 Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving emails on the 
Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, it's a trove.
 
 It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have to be 
generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade! , right?
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 
 
 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")
 
 
 
 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 
 
 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 
 
 The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
 If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 
 
 I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously 
it's a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling 
you, it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 
 
 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 
 
 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 
 
 In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 















 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

Using the meta-data, it shouldn't take long for the FBI to sort out all the 
mail, if they work on it 24/7. Obviously the pressure is on to analyze all the 
data ASAP and report back to Congress.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  Like it's not hard to search through an email database for keywords that 
would find emails that expose malfeasance.
 
 On 10/31/2016 01:11 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   No, Weiner wasn't sending emails via Clinton's server.
 
 
 650,000 emails over 10 years would be about 178 per day. We don't know how 
many of those were his and how many were hers, or how many were sent and how 
many received. But Weiner was a congressman, and then ran for mayor of NYC, so 
it's to be expected that a lot of emails would go through his account every 
day. And we have no idea whether any of them were sexts.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone as 
devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive and mailed 
them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when Comey makes the FBI 
transcript of the Weiner interview public after the investigation is completed. 
 
 Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving emails on the 
Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, it's a trove.
 
 It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have to be 
generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade! , right?
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 
 
 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")
 
 
 
 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 
 
 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 
 
 The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
 If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 
 
 I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously 
it's a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling 
you, it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 
 
 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 
 
 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 
 
 In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 















 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Right. However, we don't have the email database, now, do we? So we can't 
search through it, can we? 

 You misread something, obviously.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  Like it's not hard to search through an email database for keywords that 
would find emails that expose malfeasance.
 
 On 10/31/2016 01:11 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   No, Weiner wasn't sending emails via Clinton's server.
 
 
 650,000 emails over 10 years would be about 178 per day. We don't know how 
many of those were his and how many were hers, or how many were sent and how 
many received. But Weiner was a congressman, and then ran for mayor of NYC, so 
it's to be expected that a lot of emails would go through his account every 
day. And we have no idea whether any of them were sexts.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone as 
devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive and mailed 
them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when Comey makes the FBI 
transcript of the Weiner interview public after the investigation is completed. 
 
 Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving emails on the 
Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, it's a trove.
 
 It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have to be 
generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade! , right?
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 
 
 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")
 
 
 
 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 
 
 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 
 
 The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
 If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 
 
 I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously 
it's a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling 
you, it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 
 
 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 
 
 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 
 
 In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 















 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

LOL!  Like it's not hard to search through an email database for 
keywords that would find emails that expose malfeasance.


On 10/31/2016 01:11 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:

No, Weiner wasn't sending emails via Clinton's server.

650,000 emails over 10 years would be about 178 per day. We don't know 
how many of those were his and how many were hers, or how many were 
sent and how many received. But Weiner was a congressman, and then ran 
for mayor of NYC, so it's to be expected that a lot of emails would go 
through his account every day. And we have no idea whether any of them 
were sexts.




--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone 
as devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive 
and mailed them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when 
Comey makes the FBI transcript of the Weiner interview public after 
the investigation is completed.


Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving 
emails on the Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, 
it's a trove.


It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have 
to be generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade! 
, right?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails 
were on Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so 
obviously she wouldn't know which emails they were.


(BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on 
Weiner's laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been 
reporting that several thousand did, but we don't know anything for 
sure at this point. Highly unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears 
that this count included Weiner's own emails, not just Abedin's, going 
back quite a few years.


Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in 
connection with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite 
clear that the FBI found no indications of any intent to withhold 
those emails.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to 
the FBI, so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of 
mail she sent to Hillary's home-brew server.


The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 
emails on Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top 
secret information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right?


I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" 
Obviously it's a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI 
investigation. I'm telling you, it's a Potemkin village all the way down.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her 
campaign doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails.


The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.

So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are 
important, why not just release them - why do they have to come from 
the FBI?


In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

No, Weiner wasn't sending emails via Clinton's server.
 

 650,000 emails over 10 years would be about 178 per day. We don't know how 
many of those were his and how many were hers, or how many were sent and how 
many received. But Weiner was a congressman, and then ran for mayor of NYC, so 
it's to be expected that a lot of emails would go through his account every 
day. And we have no idea whether any of them were sexts.
 

 

 

 --In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone as 
devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive and mailed 
them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when Comey makes the FBI 
transcript of the Weiner interview public after the investigation is completed. 

Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving emails on the 
Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, it's a trove.

It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have to be 
generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade, right?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 

 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

 

 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 

 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's 
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, 
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

Key part of this morning's interview:
https://youtu.be/-25-E8Y7B8k

On 10/31/2016 12:25 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:


Listen to the interview.  Or watch as it should be up later today on 
YouTube. I'll post the link later. I didn't say for the whole country 
did I? Stop making things up.


Bev Harris is a serious investigator of election rigging especially 
using voting machines.

http://blackboxvoting.org/

The first video explains what I've said was discussed in the interview.

HBO documentary on her organization.
http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/


On 10/31/2016 12:05 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


Bhairitu, there is no "central computer" that tabulates all the votes 
across the country. There are only state systems (many different 
types). Common sense should tell you that. The popular vote doesn't 
decide the election, the electoral vote system, state by state, does. 
If this lady is telling you otherwise, she's full of it.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Listen to the interview.  It's not just one state.

On 10/31/2016 11:40 AM, authfriend@...  
[FairfieldLife] wrote:



The central computer for which state?




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
, 
 wrote :

Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed
in the second hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some
interesting things to say including that a developer found the
key for the central computer that tabulates the votes which
allows it to cap votes and control the results.  Check it out.

On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:


It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this
election cycle.  The biggest take away from this is how ill
prepared and ignorant the key players in this cluster fuck have
been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the "cyber" world is
knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks
while at the same time condemning Snowden in the past and
Assange and Wikileaks presently.  She, Podesta,
Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend workshop
in how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.

I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to
be Bernie-Lite.  Of the 2 candidates she is the least
offensive, but my hopes for real change are pretty darn low. 
She doesn't listen.


Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet
security while the marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone
apps that are grooming them for a big rip off.  It must be
doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos and
arrogance.

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

As you know--according to what you've read--two devices were destroyed, those 
of Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and former aide Heather Samuelson. We don't know 
whether records of their destruction were maintained; most likely they were, 
since their destruction, as you know, was part of an immunity deal negotiated 
by the lawyer for the two aides. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, some of the digital devices used by Clinton, 
Abaden and thier staff were destroyed using hammers. How many, nobody seems to 
know. Maybe they just took the phones and iPads out back to the alley at night 
and smashed them. 

Apparently no records of their destruction were maintained. They are just 
missing. Go figure.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As has been pointed out to you, the FBI has not destroyed the Abedin/Weiner 
devices.

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

So there is no one central computer for the entire country, just as I said. You 
could have made that clear in your initial post, and explained briefly what she 
was talking about, whatever it was.  

 Instead, you referred misleadingly to "the key for the central computer that 
tabulates the votes which allows it to...control the results," implying that 
there was only one such computer that tabulated all the votes cast.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Listen to the interview.  Or watch as it should be up later today on YouTube. 
I'll post the link later. I didn't say for the whole country did I?  Stop 
making things up.
 
 Bev Harris is a serious investigator of election rigging especially using 
voting machines.  
 http://blackboxvoting.org/ http://blackboxvoting.org/
 
 The first video explains what I've said was discussed in the interview.
 
 HBO documentary on her organization.
 http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/ http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/
 
 
 On 10/31/2016 12:05 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Bhairitu, there is no "central computer" that tabulates all the votes across 
the country. There are only state systems (many different types). Common sense 
should tell you that. The popular vote doesn't decide the election, the 
electoral vote system, state by state, does. If this lady is telling you 
otherwise, she's full of it.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 Listen to the interview.  It's not just one state.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:40 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   The central computer for which state?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed in the second 
hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some interesting things to say 
including that a developer found the key for the central computer that 
tabulates the votes which allows it to cap votes and control the results.  
Check it out.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:
 
   It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election cycle.  
The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and ignorant the key 
players in this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the 
"cyber" world is knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks 
while at the same time condemning Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks 
presently.  She, Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend 
workshop in how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.
 
 I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be Bernie-Lite. 
 Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my hopes for real change 
are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.
 
 Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security while the 
marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are grooming them for a 
big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos 
and arrogance.

 




 
 



 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

Listen to the interview.  Or watch as it should be up later today on 
YouTube. I'll post the link later. I didn't say for the whole country 
did I?  Stop making things up.


Bev Harris is a serious investigator of election rigging especially 
using voting machines.

http://blackboxvoting.org/

The first video explains what I've said was discussed in the interview.

HBO documentary on her organization.
http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/


On 10/31/2016 12:05 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


Bhairitu, there is no "central computer" that tabulates all the votes 
across the country. There are only state systems (many different 
types). Common sense should tell you that. The popular vote doesn't 
decide the election, the electoral vote system, state by state, does. 
If this lady is telling you otherwise, she's full of it.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Listen to the interview.  It's not just one state.

On 10/31/2016 11:40 AM, authfriend@...  
[FairfieldLife] wrote:



The central computer for which state?




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
, 
 wrote :

Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed
in the second hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some
interesting things to say including that a developer found the
key for the central computer that tabulates the votes which
allows it to cap votes and control the results.  Check it out.

On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:


It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this
election cycle.  The biggest take away from this is how ill
prepared and ignorant the key players in this cluster fuck have
been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the "cyber" world is
knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks
while at the same time condemning Snowden in the past and
Assange and Wikileaks presently. She, Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz
and DNC all need to spend a weekend workshop in how to use
Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.

I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to
be Bernie-Lite.  Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive,
but my hopes for real change are pretty darn low.  She doesn't
listen.

Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet
security while the marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone
apps that are grooming them for a big rip off.  It must be
doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos and arrogance.

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

All they have to do is put down the phone and get to work. We're not paying 
them to sit around yakking on their phones about yoga poses - on company time, 
using company equipment. Rules are for the little people, right?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and ignorant the key 
players in this cluster fuck have been...

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

According to what I've read, some of the digital devices used by Clinton, 
Abaden and thier staff were destroyed using hammers. How many, nobody seems to 
know. Maybe they just took the phones and iPads out back to the alley at night 
and smashed them. 

Apparently no records of their destruction were maintained. They are just 
missing. Go figure.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As has been pointed out to you, the FBI has not destroyed the Abedin/Weiner 
devices.

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone as 
devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive and mailed 
them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when Comey makes the FBI 
transcript of the Weiner interview public after the investigation is completed. 

Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving emails on the 
Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, it's a trove.

It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have to be 
generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade, right?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 

 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

 

 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 

 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's 
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, 
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Bhairitu, there is no "central computer" that tabulates all the votes across 
the country. There are only state systems (many different types). Common sense 
should tell you that. The popular vote doesn't decide the election, the 
electoral vote system, state by state, does. If this lady is telling you 
otherwise, she's full of it. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Listen to the interview.  It's not just one state.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:40 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   The central computer for which state?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed in the second 
hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some interesting things to say 
including that a developer found the key for the central computer that 
tabulates the votes which allows it to cap votes and control the results.  
Check it out.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:
 
   It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election cycle.  
The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and ignorant the key 
players in this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the 
"cyber" world is knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks 
while at the same time condemning Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks 
presently.  She, Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend 
workshop in how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.
 
 I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be Bernie-Lite. 
 Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my hopes for real change 
are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.
 
 Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security while the 
marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are grooming them for a 
big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos 
and arrogance.

 




 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

Listen to the interview.  It's not just one state.

On 10/31/2016 11:40 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


The central computer for which state?




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed in 
the second hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some 
interesting things to say including that a developer found the key for 
the central computer that tabulates the votes which allows it to cap 
votes and control the results.  Check it out.


On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:

It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election 
cycle.  The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and 
ignorant the key players in this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is 
obviously oblivious to the "cyber" world is knows jack shit.  Hillary 
on the one hand benefits from leaks while at the same time condemning 
Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks presently. She, 
Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend 
workshop in how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.


I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be 
Bernie-Lite.  Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my 
hopes for real change are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.


Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security 
while the marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are 
grooming them for a big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this 
politicians and their big egos and arrogance.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

The central computer for which state? 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed in the second 
hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some interesting things to say 
including that a developer found the key for the central computer that 
tabulates the votes which allows it to cap votes and control the results.  
Check it out.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:
 
   It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election cycle.  
The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and ignorant the key 
players in this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the 
"cyber" world is knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks 
while at the same time condemning Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks 
presently.  She, Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend 
workshop in how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.
 
 I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be Bernie-Lite. 
 Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my hopes for real change 
are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.
 
 Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security while the 
marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are grooming them for a 
big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos 
and arrogance.

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Interestingly, this video clip does not include Comey's response to Gowdy. 
Somehow I don't think Comey felt that he'd been "destroyed." 

 (Remember, Gowdy is the chap who became almost hysterical over Clinton's IT 
team using BleachBit--a free, open-source app used by many home computer users 
to clean up their hard disks--to delete Clinton's old personal emails. Gowdy's 
frenzied claims are what inspired Trump to denounce Clinton for "acid-washing" 
her emails.)
 

 As I've said before, nobody who hasn't read and absorbed this Politico account 
of the FBI's notes and reports on Clinton's email server is qualified to 
comment on the situation:
 

 What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email Server 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 
 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 
 What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email... 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 New documents tell the full, strange story of a technophobic VIP, a sloppy 
State Department, and the jerry-rigged computer that held it all together.
 
 
 
 View on www.politico.com 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 

 

 It's a complicated story; but the more you know about it, the less it looks 
like anything even remotely criminal. It's easy, though, to make it *sound* 
criminal when the details are omitted and facts are twisted, ignorantly or (as 
with Gowdy) otherwise.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI found no indications of 
any intent to withhold those emails.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmHgOn5KJI4 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmHgOn5KJI4
 

 ►Trey Gowdy Destroys FBI’s James Comey over Hillary Clinton’s ‘Intent’ 
#HillaryClinton#DonaldTrump# https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmHgOn5KJI4
 

 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 12:53 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey
 
 
   As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were 
on Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she 
wouldn't know which emails they were.
 

 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

 

 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 

 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's 
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, 
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 












 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed in the 
second hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some interesting 
things to say including that a developer found the key for the central 
computer that tabulates the votes which allows it to cap votes and 
control the results.  Check it out.


On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:


It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election 
cycle.  The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and 
ignorant the key players in this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is 
obviously oblivious to the "cyber" world is knows jack shit.  Hillary 
on the one hand benefits from leaks while at the same time condemning 
Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks presently. She, Podesta, 
Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend workshop in how 
to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.


I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be 
Bernie-Lite.  Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my 
hopes for real change are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.


Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security 
while the marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are 
grooming them for a big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this 
politicians and their big egos and arrogance.

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[ultrarishi]

It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election cycle.  The 
biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and ignorant the key players in 
this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the "cyber" world 
is knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks while at the 
same time condemning Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks presently.  
She, Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend workshop in 
how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.

I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be Bernie-Lite.  
Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my hopes for real change 
are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.

Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security while the 
marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are grooming them for a 
big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos 
and arrogance.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI found no indications of 
any intent to withhold those emails.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmHgOn5KJI4
  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
||  
►Trey Gowdy Destroys FBI’s James Comey over Hillary Clinton’s ‘Intent’
 #HillaryClinton#DonaldTrump#  |   |

  |

  |

 


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 12:53 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey
   
    As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were 
on Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she 
wouldn't know which emails they were.
(BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's laptop 
came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's 
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, 
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails.
The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, why 
not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?










  #yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639 -- #yiv4492873639ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4492873639 
#yiv4492873639ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4492873639 
#yiv4492873639ygrp-mkp #yiv4492873639hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639ygrp-mkp #yiv4492873639ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639ygrp-mkp .yiv4492873639ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639ygrp-mkp .yiv4492873639ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639ygrp-mkp .yiv4492873639ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4492873639ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4492873639 
#yiv4492873639ygrp-sponsor #yiv4492873639ygrp-lc #yiv4492873639hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4492873639 
#yiv4492873639ygrp-sponsor #yiv4492873639ygrp-lc .yiv4492873639ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4492873639 
#yiv4492873639activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4492873639
 #yiv4492873639activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4492873639 
#yiv4492873639activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4492873639 #yiv4492873639activity span 
.yiv4492873639underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4492873639 
.yiv4492873639attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4492873639 .yiv4492873639attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4492873639 .yiv4492873639attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4492873639 .yiv4492873639attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4492873639 .yiv4492873639attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4492873639 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv4492873639 .yiv4492873639bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4492873639 
.yiv4492873639bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4492873639 dd.yiv4492873639last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4492873639 dd.yiv4492873639last p 
span {margin-right:10

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

As has been pointed out to you, the FBI has not destroyed the Abedin/Weiner 
devices. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 

 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

 

 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 

 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's 
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, 
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

The FBI finds 650K of State Department emails on a perverts laptop computer: 
how did they get there? So, let's get to the truth of the matter and answer 
some simple questions: 

Why did Wiener have thousands of his wife’s emails on his laptop computer, and 
without her knowledge? Does he have Huma's password to the Clinton home-brew 
server? And, why is Anthony Wiener cooperating in the investigation into the 
Clinton email scandal?

Maybe Wiener thought that if he could keep a cache of emails between his wife 
and Hillary Clinton, that would afford him some protection against a criminal 
prosecution. Not likely, but pervs have been known to both blackmail other 
pervs and get blackmailed in return.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Oh, forgot to add: 

 Note to Doug, per your recent diktat: I'm making this post because I believe 
attempts to mislead and deceive, such as in the post I'm responding to, are 
spiritually harmful, not just to the people who read them but also to the 
person who posts them. We would all be much better off spiritually if we 
refrained from making such attempts and instead did our best to stick to the 
truth...

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :
 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 







 
  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's 
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, 
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Oh, forgot to add: 

 Note to Doug, per your recent diktat: I'm making this post because I believe 
attempts to mislead and deceive, such as in the post I'm responding to, are 
spiritually harmful, not just to the people who read them but also to the 
person who posts them. We would all be much better off spiritually if we 
refrained from making such attempts and instead did our best to stick to the 
truth. 
 (Doug will soon delete this post, as he has deleted several others of my 
recent posts that, for the reasons stated above, corrected false and/or 
misleading information.) 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :
 
 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 







 
  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, why 
not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Anyone who is good at IT would probably be skeptical of working for ANY 
political organization.  Any who are political at all are either anarchists or 
libertarian and don't care much for the DNC or GOP.
 
 On 10/31/2016 08:56 AM, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   It absolutely calls into question the caliber of the people the DMC hired to 
keep communications safe.  That the most basic of phishing expeditions could 
have resulted in this massive and embarrassing hack is remarkable.
 
 
 Probably the only thing more remarkable is the fact that the right wing 
"Patriots" are completely silent about the fact that is was orchestrated by 
Russia, or that a foreign government is meddling in our internal issues to the 
extent they are, or that this same foreign government is threatening military 
action if the candidate they favor is not elected.
 
 
 What the fuck is going on!
 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 It looks like a whole team of IT experts fell for it:
 
 How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
 
 
 
 How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached OCTOBER 28--So how did John Podesta’s 
e-mail account get hacked? The answer to that question came into embarrassing 
focus this morning with th...


 
 View on www.thesmokinggun... 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote :
 
 Worlds greatest idiots #1 and #2 
 
 Who here has fallen for the "Quick, change you passwork. You are vulnerable", 
at least in the past five years? 
 

 

 








 
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

It looks like some anonymous hackers tricked the Podesta IT staff. It may have 
been the Russians, but it's apparently a common scam on the internet. Almost 
any security team would know better than to click on an email that wants you to 
change your password.

Always expect a train.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It absolutely calls into question the caliber of the people the DMC hired to 
keep communications safe.  That the most basic of phishing expeditions could 
have resulted in this massive and embarrassing hack is remarkable. 

 Probably the only thing more remarkable is the fact that the right wing 
"Patriots" are completely silent about the fact that is was orchestrated by 
Russia, or that a foreign government is meddling in our internal issues to the 
extent they are, or that this same foreign government is threatening military 
action if the candidate they favor is not elected.
 

 What the fuck is going on!

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It looks like a whole team of IT experts fell for it:

How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125 
 
 http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125
 
 How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125 
OCTOBER 28--So how did John Podesta’s e-mail account get hacked? The answer to 
that question came into embarrassing focus this morning with th...


 
 View on www.thesmokinggun... 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Worlds greatest idiots #1 and #2 

 Who here has fallen for the "Quick, change you passwork. You are vulnerable", 
at least in the past five years? 
 

 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

Anyone who is good at IT would probably be skeptical of working for ANY 
political organization.  Any who are political at all are either 
anarchists or libertarian and don't care much for the DNC or GOP.


On 10/31/2016 08:56 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


It absolutely calls into question the caliber of the people the DMC 
hired to keep communications safe.  That the most basic of phishing 
expeditions could have resulted in this massive and embarrassing hack 
is remarkable.



Probably the only thing more remarkable is the fact that the right 
wing "Patriots" are completely silent about the fact that is was 
orchestrated by Russia, or that a foreign government is meddling in 
our internal issues to the extent they are, or that this same foreign 
government is threatening military action if the candidate they favor 
is not elected.


What the fuck is going on!



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

It looks like a whole team of IT experts fell for it:

How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
 





image 




How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
 

OCTOBER 28--So how did John Podesta’s e-mail account get hacked? The 
answer to that question came into embarrassing focus this morning with 
th...


View on www.thesmokinggun... 



Preview by Yahoo


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Worlds greatest idiots #1 and #2

Who here has fallen for the "Quick, change you passwork. You are 
vulnerable", at least in the past five years?

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

It absolutely calls into question the caliber of the people the DMC hired to 
keep communications safe.  That the most basic of phishing expeditions could 
have resulted in this massive and embarrassing hack is remarkable. 

 Probably the only thing more remarkable is the fact that the right wing 
"Patriots" are completely silent about the fact that is was orchestrated by 
Russia, or that a foreign government is meddling in our internal issues to the 
extent they are, or that this same foreign government is threatening military 
action if the candidate they favor is not elected.
 

 What the fuck is going on!
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It looks like a whole team of IT experts fell for it:

How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125 
 
 http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125
 
 How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125 
OCTOBER 28--So how did John Podesta’s e-mail account get hacked? The answer to 
that question came into embarrassing focus this morning with th...


 
 View on www.thesmokinggun... 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Worlds greatest idiots #1 and #2 

 Who here has fallen for the "Quick, change you passwork. You are vulnerable", 
at least in the past five years? 
 

 

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

It looks like a whole team of IT experts fell for it:

How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125 
 
 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125 
 
 How Podesta's Gmail Account Was Breached 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125 
OCTOBER 28--So how did John Podesta’s e-mail account get hacked? The answer to 
that question came into embarrassing focus this morning with th...
 
 
 
 View on www.thesmokinggun... 
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/how-john-podesta-got-hacked-839125 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Worlds greatest idiots #1 and #2 

 Who here has fallen for the "Quick, change you passwork. You are vulnerable", 
at least in the past five years? 
 

 

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

As I said in another post:
 

 Nobody here who hasn't carefully read this Politico story (long and detailed) 
about the FBI interview notes and reports on its investigation into Clinton's 
server is qualified to comment on the Clinton email situation:

 

 What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email Server 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 
 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email... 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 New documents tell the full, strange story of a technophobic VIP, a sloppy 
State Department, and the jerry-rigged computer that held it all together.


 
 View on www.politico.com 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 Preview by Yahoo
 

  
 (Note to Doug, per your recent diktat: I'm making this post because I believe 
attempts to mislead and deceive, such as in the post I'm responding to, are 
spiritually harmful, not just to the people who read them but also to the 
person who posts them. We would all be much better off spiritually if we 
refrained from making such attempts and instead did our best to stick to the 
truth.)

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :



 
 No, I cannot explain how anyone would think they could get away with deleting 
33,000 emails and then wiping their hard drive clean and using hammers to 
destroy phones - WITH THE FBI BREATHING DOWN YOUR NECK. 

I can't explain how anyone could be so dumb as to think they could get away 
with something like that, when everyone knows you're not supposed to destroy 
any evidence in a federal investigation that now includes a sexting scandal. 

Can you explain it to me? Thanks.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And how do you explain the ACID-WASHED emails? Someone, according to trump, 
acid-washed each one, then after they dried, destroyed them. His understanding 
of tech is...unusual. 

Not only is he morally bankrupt, but a blithering idiot on just about any 
topic, and yet, according to his followers, he is the messiah. The one who 
cannot successfully tie his shoelaces, will lead them to the promised land. 

Seriously?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on 
several others.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a 
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 As you know, the sentence in red is the only one that's factual in the 
paragraph from your post below. The others are either nonfactual or misleading.
 

 (Note to Doug, per your recent diktat: I'm making this post because I believe 
attempts to mislead and deceive, such as in the post I'm responding to, are 
spiritually harmful, not just to the people who read them but also to the 
person who posts them. We would all be much better off spiritually if we 
refrained from making such attempts and instead did our best to stick to the 
truth.)

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 So, Hillary used a cloth to wipe her home-brew mail server; her staff used 
BlechBit on her HD; the FBI destroyed two laptops, after giving immunity; and 
the DNC staffers used hammers to destroy dozens of phones - but you're thinking 
that none of the phones or servers or laptops had any of Huma's email on them? 
Go figure.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As you know, this wasn't done by the FBI, nor was it done to Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices... 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on 
several others.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a 
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

No, I cannot explain how anyone would think they could get away with deleting 
33,000 emails and then wiping their hard drive clean and using hammers to 
destroy phones - WITH THE FBI BREATHING DOWN YOUR NECK. 

I can't explain how anyone could be so dumb as to think they could get away 
with something like that, when everyone knows you're not supposed to destroy 
any evidence in a federal investigation that now includes a sexting scandal. 

Can you explain it to me? Thanks.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And how do you explain the ACID-WASHED emails? Someone, according to trump, 
acid-washed each one, then after they dried, destroyed them. His understanding 
of tech is...unusual. 

Not only is he morally bankrupt, but a blithering idiot on just about any 
topic, and yet, according to his followers, he is the messiah. The one who 
cannot successfully tie his shoelaces, will lead them to the promised land. 

Seriously?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on 
several others.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a 
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

So, Hillary used a cloth to wipe her home-brew mail server; her staff used 
BlechBit on her HD; the FBI destroyed two laptops, after giving immunity; and 
the DNC staffers used hammers to destroy dozens of phones - but you're thinking 
that none of the phones or servers or laptops had any of Huma's email on them? 
Go figure.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As you know, this wasn't done by the FBI, nor was it done to Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices... 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on 
several others.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a 
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

And how do you explain the ACID-WASHED emails? Someone, according to trump, 
acid-washed each one, then after they dried, destroyed them. His understanding 
of tech is...unusual. 

Not only is he morally bankrupt, but a blithering idiot on just about any 
topic, and yet, according to his followers, he is the messiah. The one who 
cannot successfully tie his shoelaces, will lead them to the promised land. 

Seriously?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on 
several others.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a 
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

As you know, this wasn't done by the FBI, nor was it done to Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices, so it's a complete non sequitur. 

 (Note to Doug, per your recent diktat: I'm making this post because I believe 
attempts to mislead and deceive, such as in the post I'm responding to, are 
spiritually harmful, not just to the people who read them but also to the 
person who posts them. We would all be much better off spiritually if we 
refrained from making such attempts and instead did our best to stick to the 
truth.)
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on 
several others.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a 
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on 
several others.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a 
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Guilty of what? Wearing white after Labor Day? This meme that she is some sort 
of career criminal is ludicrous. Yes, it will be a landslide win.
 

 Yes, Hillary has created some of her current problems all by herself but she 
has had to fight Russia, the worst Republican nominee ever elected in the 
history of the US, bigotry and baskets and baskets of deplorables not to 
mention resist the inherent male reluctance to have a woman in such a potent 
position of power. The woman is a superhero. My God, when she is finally 
elected it will be some sort of miracle. Is it November 8th yet?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 She may win the election, but probably not by a landslide, as you claim. The 
question is, how long will she be in office before she gets an indictment. 
Others have been prosecuted and found guilty of much less. Laws are for the 
little people, right?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Sure. HRC will win the election in a landslide in a little over a week. The 
rest is noise. You're welcome.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Worlds greatest idiots #1 and #2 

 Who here has fallen for the "Quick, change you passwork. You are vulnerable", 
at least in the past five years?
 

 
 

 

 

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 She may win the election, but probably not by a landslide, as you claim. The 
question is, how long will she be in office before she gets an indictment. 
Others have been prosecuted and found guilty of much less.
 

 This (in red) is incorrect, as you know. James Comey was very clear on that in 
his July press conference about the investigation.
 

 

 

 Laws are for the little people, right?

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Sure. HRC will win the election in a landslide in a little over a week. The 
rest is noise. You're welcome.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

"What connection Huma had to Wiener and his sexting"--she's his wife, or was; 
she's divorcing him because of the sexting. 

 No "corruption" has been found with regard to Clinton's emails. Technical 
incompetence, yes, but that hasn't been only among "DNC staffers." It was 
throughout the State Department and has been for some time, since well before 
Clinton became secretary of state.
 

 Nobody here who hasn't carefully read this Politico story (long and detailed) 
about the FBI interview notes and reports on its investigation into Clinton's 
server is qualified to comment on the Clinton email situation:
 

 What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email Server 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 
 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 
 What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email... 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 New documents tell the full, strange story of a technophobic VIP, a sloppy 
State Department, and the jerry-rigged computer that held it all together.
 
 
 
 View on www.politico.com 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Former Secretary of State’s Top IT Official Pleads 5th Amendment More Than 90 
Times 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 
 
 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 
 Former Secretary of State’s Top IT Official Pleads 5th A... 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 (CNSNews.com) – The former top IT official to then-Secretary of State Hillary 
Clinton, pleaded the 5th Amendment against self-incrimination – 90 times -- 
in...


 
 View on www.cnsnews.com 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It's all about sexting, scandals, corruption, and emails, not to mention 
incompetence. 

So, what we need to know now is what connection Huma had to Wiener and his 
sexting. And, why exactly were they sharing devices? 

Obviously, there is a lot of ignorance about IT and mail servers among the DNC 
party staffers. They don't seem to understand even the basics of secure online 
communications and record-keeping. All of their mail has been apparently 
hacked. 

We are in the best of hands!  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition








 
  

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

"According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a 
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and 
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

But not the devices of Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner, contrary to what you 
implied. Thank you for correcting yourself. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "...the destruction of the laptops is particularly troubling as it means that 
the computers could not be used as evidence in future legal proceedings, should 
new information or circumstances arise."

FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immunity deal, lawmaker 
says 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
 
 
 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
 
 FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immu... 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
 Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement 
obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House 
Judic...


 
 View on www.foxnews.com 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Guilty of what? Wearing white after Labor Day? This meme that she is some sort 
of career criminal is ludicrous. Yes, it will be a landslide win.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 She may win the election, but probably not by a landslide, as you claim. The 
question is, how long will she be in office before she gets an indictment. 
Others have been prosecuted and found guilty of much less. Laws are for the 
little people, right?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Sure. HRC will win the election in a landslide in a little over a week. The 
rest is noise. You're welcome.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

She may win the election, but probably not by a landslide, as you claim. The 
question is, how long will she be in office before she gets an indictment. 
Others have been prosecuted and found guilty of much less. Laws are for the 
little people, right?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Sure. HRC will win the election in a landslide in a little over a week. The 
rest is noise. You're welcome.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

"...the destruction of the laptops is particularly troubling as it means that 
the computers could not be used as evidence in future legal proceedings, should 
new information or circumstances arise."

FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immunity deal, lawmaker 
says 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
 
 
 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
 
 
 FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immu... 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
 Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement 
obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House 
Judic...
 
 
 
 View on www.foxnews.com 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth 
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to 
your sources. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Sure. HRC will win the election in a landslide in a little over a week. The 
rest is noise. You're welcome.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of 
a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

Former Secretary of State’s Top IT Official Pleads 5th Amendment More Than 90 
Times 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 
 
 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 
 
 Former Secretary of State’s Top IT Official Pleads 5th A... 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 (CNSNews.com) – The former top IT official to then-Secretary of State Hillary 
Clinton, pleaded the 5th Amendment against self-incrimination – 90 times -- 
in...
 
 
 
 View on www.cnsnews.com 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It's all about sexting, scandals, corruption, and emails, not to mention 
incompetence. 

So, what we need to know now is what connection Huma had to Wiener and his 
sexting. And, why exactly were they sharing devices? 

Obviously, there is a lot of ignorance about IT and mail servers among the DNC 
party staffers. They don't seem to understand even the basics of secure online 
communications and record-keeping. All of their mail has been apparently 
hacked. 

We are in the best of hands!  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

[anon_alias]

It's all about sexting, scandals, corruption, and emails, not to mention 
incompetence. 

So, what we need to know now is what connection Huma had to Wiener and his 
sexting. And, why exactly were they sharing devices? 

Obviously, there is a lot of ignorance about IT and mail servers among the DNC 
party staffers. They don't seem to understand even the basics of secure online 
communications and record-keeping. All of their mail has been apparently 
hacked. 

We are in the best of hands!  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition