Re: [Gimp-user] Close up color gaps
2014-02-28 18:05 GMT+01:00, Chris Mohler cr33...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Yanno ian.osb...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to close up those whites so there are only red and orange patches ie for the white border to be filled with the colour on either side. The rub is I want to keep the colors solid- no blurring/feathering etc Select by color, Select-Grow, fill with the color, repeat for each color? While filling DON'T use bucket - You'll end up with thin white lines inside Your county. Use brush and You'll get nice sharp borders. Other option is: 1) Use wand (Press [u]), click on county 2) Set county's color as foreground color (press [o], click on county) 3) Turn selection into path (icon in paths card/window) 4) Deselect county / select all (press [control] + [a]) 5) Paint along the path (icon in paths card/window) - in pop up window You select thickness of line. 6) Repeat steps 1 to 5 for each color (for each county) Good luck Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Restricting tool movement along a single axis
2013/10/31, Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net: Like View/Snap to active path? (which suffers two probems as far as I know: 1) you cannot set the capture radius like you can for guides and canvas edges, and 2) it doesn't work in the path editor... where it would be most useful. Would You please explain why. I'm not sure how serious this problems are. Whether it is impossible to set capture radius due to some Gimp/GTK internal restriction or we haven't try it yet? I'm open to any suggestions: how both of us could keep our desired workflow. -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Restricting tool movement along a single axis
hi Such tool option: move by guide / move by path would be appreciated. One thing is primary problem: moving tool or handle (like in perspective tool) along single axis. Something like this (or adjusting behavior while pressing Ctrl) would be really usefull. Another thing is to look at this problem from different point of view. IMHO we deal with one example of slightly different problem. Maybe developement is in so early stage that I could suggest slightly different approach. Imagine that we put on our graphic tablet triangle (or any other tool from technical drawing tradition). We could get desired effect of restricting pointer movement. In fact we'd restrict tablet/pointer movement to the edge of template/ruller. In digital graphic we use guides, mesh, paths or selection/quick mask. Each of these tools behave like our virtual template but for different tasks. They mostly affect tools. Why dont make one tool that will affect not tools, but pointer? Why don't add easily adjustable input for this new tool - like paths? We could use predefined pointer restricting paths or easily prepare new one by preparing such path in Gimp, Inkscape or any other path creating software. Don't get me wrong - i like idea of improving tools. I would like even more improving them in more user adjustable way. And i'm pretty aware that every such change will have dramatic consequences in someones workflow. For example Ofnuts mentioned handle behavior in perspective tool. I understand - it's frustrating when You have to precisely catch center of the handle and later move it to guides. On the other hands this behavior let me catch any point within selection and position it in new place. I do a lot such things while adjusting perspective in photographs of paintings, documents etc. - In photographs of my painting i catch the corner of painting, not the corner of photo. I do simple perspective correction to guides - everything around painting will be cut away later. I dont want to reshape selection at this stage, because later another tool is applied (bent between paths). While leaving this behavior as it is - i'll save my fast correction technique, and Ofnuts will be dissapointed. While changing it to automatic moving center of nearest handle to exact pointer location, problem mentioned by Ofnuts will be solved ... and I'll lost my primary tool. When we get some modifier key, that will allow to move pointer to center of a handle instead of moving the handle itself - we will both get our desired functionality. This compromise require change in thinking - we could use pointer as input device, and modify it's XY input. Is such change in understanding pointer behavior possible? Or we are sentenced to compete which workflow, which task is more important? Hope we can find a compromise that will be possible to code. Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Layer Opacity Access Point(s) Madness
3D view could be a solution for powerfull PC, not for too big image on too little ram. Would it be possible to use one program with many UIs? Let's say i start GIMP and can switch between single window mode, multiple window mode. Within each of this mode there could be next switch to see content in normal structure or 3D view. It reminds ideas like 3D goopher or Compiz - nice shiny toy to hang computer. Gimp is image editing software - it operate on files that need lot of ram. All this 3D features would just add another demands for hardware. At least leave an option to disable them. Otherwise we might end up with insane paradox: Apple workstation and Photoshop CS 666 will be cheaper option than hardware capable of running Gimp 6.66 I don't want to offend anyone - just trying to remind You, that every feature has its cost - no matter whether we count it in hardware resources or in money. If You manage to create additional alternative UI for Gimp - great, if You make normal Gimp more expensive just to get few visible clues - this is controversial. Dominik Tabisz 2013/8/31, yahvuu yah...@gmail.com: Am 31.08.2013 12:21, schrieb Ofnuts: How would you identify a layer on the canvas? The topmost non-transparent one (like the Move tool uses)? that's a tough question. And where to set the opacity threshold when choosing from multiple layers that contribute to the pixel under the cursor? Things become worse with blend modes like multiply, when there is no way to determine which layer is on top just by looking at the canvas. For example, a bottom black layer can appear as if it were on top of a multiply-mode layer: http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/canvas-visible-order.png On the solutions side, it has been suggested to tilt the canvas in 3D to make the layer stack accessible: http://gimp-brainstorm.blogspot.de/2008/06/3d-layers.html This scheme works surprisingly well for analysing the hierarchical structure of HTML documents: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/3D_View#Controlling_the_3D_view One might also think of digging into the layer stack analogous to digging into the earth which reveals the stratigraphy of rock layers. just brainstorming, peter ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
If you know how to run this kind of commands, surely you know that you need *-dev packages installed to build anything? :) This is the only real issue with GIMP - dependencies and dance with *-dev packages. I use mostly 2.6 instead of 2.8 because of this. And i swear a lot because 2.6 lack: layer groups and new save/export behavior. Is this good thread to discuss potential improvement / feature for new export function? (i don't mean politics like: turn it back to Gimp 2.6 way rather something like: why not give little more features to export, while remaining save as it is in Gimp 2.8?) Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Image Area doesn't respond to mouse.
It seem that similar problem appear on many versions of GIMP, 2.6, 2.21, 2.7.*, 2.8 another instance where it occurs is using mouse/touchpad and tablet simultanously (my case) Is this particular problem happening on GNU/Linux or You encountered it on another OS? 2013/7/13, ArRaf for...@gimpusers.com: if you're using a tablet, there should be other entries in the menu as well, representing different parts of the tablet (stylus, eraser, buttons, etc. ; though they may not be labeled as obviously). Try setting the one for the stylus to screen. Also, make sure you have used your tablet before starting gimp (for example by using the stylus to launch gimp), or else it won't get recognized by the program. Ok, I've set them to screen, and I have restarted the program. The result is still the same, still no respond from any kind of tools. Also, the cursor location updates started messing up, and the cursor is blinking or some sort. Retried this a few times, still showing the same result -- ArRaf (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] [Gimp user] How to remove the filename suggesting behavior of Saving dialog in Gimp 2.4.7
i've encountered similar problem in GIMP 2.6 while saving however i cannot replicate it. In my case it was probably something depending on GTK/Xorg. If You're able to replicate this behavior try to 1) open terminal 2) run GIMP in this terminal 3) Replicate this behaviour 4) Look at the error messages in the terminal. This error messages might give some information what exactly is failing 2013/7/7, minhsien0330 minhsien0...@gmail.com: Dear all: In Gimp 2.4.7,when I am typing new filename for a image, gimp will pop out some filename suggestion for me,this behavior will block my work when I using tablet pen. I want to remove this feature of gimp 2.4.7 from source code and recompile it. Would anybody tell me where and what to remove in source code or give me a patch? Thank you very much. Best Regards, Minhsien0330 ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP kickstarter?
Fundraising for one big program/enviroment might be difficult - how do we agree which funcionality should be improved/fixed first? Maybe it would be easier to accept GIMP as an ecosystem, and focus on funding plugins for certain jobs? Or maybe there is already some kind of market where we can specify what such plugin should do and hire someone to write it? Dominik Tabisz 2013/7/7, FallenLegend for...@gimpusers.com: I think that your assessment is valid for almost all FOSS software, not just Gimp. Which issues specifically would you like to see fixed with the hypothetical 1 million dollars raised? -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com http://www.techdrivein.com/2012/12/top-5-kickstarter-crowdfunding-alternatives-opensource-software.html (fixed link) -- FallenLegend (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP kickstarter?
Michael You're right in term of changing something in GIMP as a program itself. Not sure how open is this place for users (i don't mean how patient are You in case of next flamewar like save/export. It's rather how open would You be to questions like: what can be done to use GIMP for imposition) What about changing/writing plugins for some special purposes? Is it matter for gimp-developer mailing list, or maybe there is already some kind of market for such services, or maybe we need such place? 2013/7/7, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de: On 07.07.2013 18:08, Dominik Tabisz wrote: Fundraising for one big program/enviroment might be difficult - how do we agree which funcionality should be improved/fixed first? A first step would be to have this discussion on the gimp-developer mailing list, where the current GIMP developers are available. -- HTH, Michael ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP on Thin clients
Try EditPreferencesEnviroment (it's the first card in dialog box) There You'll control maximum size of image, size of cache etc. In theory there is another solution - Xprograms can be run on one machine and displayed on another. This was philosophy behind Xserver and Xclient but i've never heared about anybody running GIMP this way. Good Luck Dominik 2013/6/17, Gunold Brunbauer gunoldbrunba...@online.de: I`m a network administrator in a secondary school. In our computer network we have 15 thin clients. I´ve installed GIMP and it worked fine. But when the pupils start gimp, then there are always some workstations on which gimp ist very, very slowly. I suppose, that those thin clients on which gimp ist started last wont get enough memory. How can I achieve that gimp will use only a limitede amount of memory space? Thank you for your advice Gunold ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8x on Linux Debian Squeeze?
Hi Some time ago i tried both compiling Gimp 2.8 on Squeeze, and installing Debian Testing ... to see what's wrong with my attempt to compile Gimp 2.8. To make long thing short - problems with compilation are caused by dependencies of Gimp 2.8 dependencies. At some moment You end up with upgrading gcc and half other system libraries. If only You can install wheezy it should solve most of Your troubles. There is one possible workaround: one user of this mailing list approached similar problem on FreeBSD. Solution was building Gimp and all it's dependencies in jail. This way system was stable and Gimp 2.8 had all needed dependencies inside jail. Unfortunately i can't remember where this instruction was and whether it can be ported to Debian. Dominik 2013/5/12, Chris Mohler cr33...@gmail.com: On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Henry W. Peters hwpet...@jamadots.com wrote: Does anyone on the list here, have any actual knowledge or experience building GIMP 2.8x on Linux Debian Squeeze? My current version of GIMP is 2.6.1. Some questions I have (for example) are: Do I /really/ have to uninstall the old version...? Any dependency issues (conflicts, etc.) ? Any way to get the (newer) dependencies by means of the terminal? Will I be able to actually do this (i.e.,/ do a working build with this version/)? I have 2.6 and 2.8 on the a Mint (like Ubuntu/Debian) system. There's a build script floating around somewhere, but I can't seem to find it now (and it required heavy modification, at least for my system anyway). There's this: http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Hacking:Building/Linux I think the biggest thing to remember is to remember to prefix everything with /opt or /home/YOU/gimp/ - ie *not* put it into /usr or /usr/local/. 'apt-get build-dep gimp' should bring in several -dev packages you'll need. The rest will need to be compiled and installed in /opt or wherever. It's been some months since I went through this - I'm probably forgetting a few things, but the short answer is yes, you can compile and install 2.8 without removing 2.6. There are quite a dew deps to work through, but keep the additions outside of your system path and you should be fine. HTH, Chris ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Dark Theme for GIMP?
If You accept making this thread slightly more offtopic i would appreciate any links to this studies on workplace ergonomics from 1960s. Color of our environment affect colors in graphics we do. Any knowledge that help to use this fact consciously reduce need for trial and error. Dominik 2013/5/11, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net: On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 20:29 +0900, Jehan Pagès wrote: Ok. I remembered for instance years ago, when everybody started to make their personal website with broken html, most were dark because it seemed cooler. Then it was told that dark websites are harder to use/read and finally are not that good for the eyes. And indeed now nearly all big websites use light colors. The big search engines started to penalise dark sites, so it was a money issue. The reason was that people would set the background to black in a paragraph or div element near the bottom of the page and have a whole bunch of search engine spam keywords in black on a black background that didn't show up. The other problem was that before CSS was widely implemented you couldon't style forms very well, so the input fields would tend to end up white on a white background. Actually if you use the evolution mail program you may still run into this with gtk styles in gnome 2, and also if you have a dark gtk theme you'll find logging in to ebay trickier than before. In general, though, dark backgrounds are good for image processing. For text, for years ASCII terminals were made with green text on a black background to reduce eye fatigue - or possibly because it was cheaper, I'm not sure ;) A lot of it will depend on your immediate environment, the brightness and contrast of your screen, viewing distance, and the amount of blood getting to your brain (drink water to help regulate blood pressure; take off shoes; sit upright; exercise...) Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Download of GIMP in 'wrong' language !
Thanks Kevin This trick with Locale environment variable worked :D When i start gimp like this: ~$ LANG=en_US.UTF8 gimp it work, and menu is english. Outside i use GIMP 2.8 portable, at home i use 2.6 and in emergency situations whatever GIMP version is aviable in LiveCD systems. Too many versions, too many similar ui ... it's really easy for mistake. Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Creating Transparent WaterMark
. I'm not sure how to save it as a new pattern. Can you help me with that? You don't need anything complicated. Do it simple way: When Your watermark is on separate layer, the easiest way is to copy this layer to a new file and save it. Later You just: 1)open this file with watermark only, 2)select all and 3)copy to a new layer in files, You want to protect. It's fast and effective solution. That's partly my way. I don't care about opacity and mode so much - i adjust it every time to get desired effect. What is important: Your watermark will have some resolution and size. When You'll get Your watermark in new file - crop it to eliminate unnecessary space around. While copying watermark as a new layer it's easier to position it or resize when there's no unnecessary empty space around. If You want to have slightly better theft detterent: Put some gradient, or any kind of changing tones on watermark image. It's ugly but when You play with modes, and flatten watermarked photography ... it is rather hard to undo. For each photo You adjust mode and opacity individually (to reduce the ugliness of watermark). Just forget that Gimp can remember mode and opacity of a layer. Good luck Dominik ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Warp like tool in gimp
Thanks Steve You mean this tool with polygon like looking icon? I'll try it again... on normal installation (on gimp portable it crashes everytime). I've already tried some tools from filtersdistort menu in gimp 2.6 - they are effective to remove fat or similar things. But they lack precision, just as You said. I need such tool for slightly different purpose: I have photos of my paintings. Unfortunately some of them are not flat - paintings are bent or twisted a little. Perspective tool is not enough - it solve troubles with angle between lens and canvas, but can't help with bent watercolor. Photographing this paintings after framing is just too difficult. So i have to digitally flatten them for photography. I see what edges are bent on photo, so i need to transform it in the opposite direction without loosing any proportions on the image. That's why this wrap tool in Photoshop give me some hope ... but i really prefer doing my job with Gimp. Maybe there is a technique for making bent paintings flat on photograpy, only i'm not aware how to do it? Thanks again Dominik ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Warp like tool in gimp
Thank You Rob After first trials this script seem to do more less what i expected :) Now i'll have to spend some time with mastering path tool, and Your script combined with perspective tool probably will do the job. Not sure if the script is aware which path was drawn first. Does it matter whether i draw top or bottom path first? Dominik 2013/4/11, Rob Antonishen rob.antonis...@gmail.com: You could try the curve bend between paths script http://registry.gimp.org/node/19214 which was created to correct distortion from scanning books. It could work (but not having seen the source images in question, I can't guarantee it...) -RobA - Quae dissolvi non possunt. -- *From:* Dominik Tabisz d.kup...@gmail.com *To:* Steve Kinney ad...@pilobilus.net *CC:* gimp-user-list@gnome.org gimp-user-list@gnome.org *Sent:* April 11, 2013 3:59 PM *Subject:* Re: [Gimp-user] Warp like tool in gimp Thanks Steve You mean this tool with polygon like looking icon? I'll try it again... on normal installation (on gimp portable it crashes everytime). I've already tried some tools from filtersdistort menu in gimp 2.6 - they are effective to remove fat or similar things. But they lack precision, just as You said. I need such tool for slightly different purpose: I have photos of my paintings. Unfortunately some of them are not flat - paintings are bent or twisted a little. Perspective tool is not enough - it solve troubles with angle between lens and canvas, but can't help with bent watercolor. Photographing this paintings after framing is just too difficult. So i have to digitally flatten them for photography. I see what edges are bent on photo, so i need to transform it in the opposite direction without loosing any proportions on the image. That's why this wrap tool in Photoshop give me some hope ... but i really prefer doing my job with Gimp. Maybe there is a technique for making bent paintings flat on photograpy, only i'm not aware how to do it? Thanks again Dominik ___ gimp-user-list mailing listgimp-user-list@gnome.orghttps://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] import vs open
I apologise that my last message appear as writen by s.kortenweg. Next time I'll pay more attention to what is going to be send, before i press send button. This bad example from Corel is my experience and i don't wish to speak for anyone else. Dominik Tabisz 2013/2/21, Dominik Tabisz d.kup...@gmail.com: All the arguments about encouraging/forcing users to non destructive workflow are reasonable, but there is one tiny problem. I've encountered it while cooperating with professional users of CorelDraw (design studios, marketing companies etc.) Corel can understand bunch of vector-based fileformats. It can import them, it can write into them. So in theory i could prepare image in *.eps or *.svg and it can be later processed in Corel. In fact any images that was not in native CorelDraw fileformat was rejected. (Even images from Adobe Illustrator !) Reason was simple: Corel open only it's native files (*.cdr). You can launch Corel and later import *.ai, *.svg, *.ps but You can not just navigate to such file and double click it to edit. You can't open them from command line too. This mean that professional corel users were forced to THINK ... they just choose to reject Your graphics. We can improve programs, we can create better images but we're unable to change peoples (un)thinking habbits. Please imagine what harm to trade and workflow can arise from proposed improvement of open/import behaviour. If You really believe that this change is necessary, there should be way of avoiding disaster that happened to Proffesional Corel Users. Let me give some proposition: 1)Gimp always open/import any type of file, it can understand. No matter if we ask program to do so from it's menu, command line or just click file in file commander. 2) After Gomp start and examine the file there are two possibilities: a) file is an *.xcf so Gimp just open it. b) file is not *.xcf - Gimp show the message and ask for permission to import it. If proposed change don't stop launching Gimp and opening/importing any file just by selecting it in a file commander, than You can hope it won't do so much harm to the bussines as Corel behaviour did. All differences would be one click more and Gimp remain universal image editor. I hope that we're not going to redefine meaning of word professional. Corel disaster shows that new meaning of this word is: someone who have ability to reject Your work. Don't let such redefinition happen in Free Software ecosystem. 2013/2/20, s.kortenweg s.korten...@hccnet.nl: On 20-02-13 12:55, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote: s.kortenweg s.korten...@hccnet.nl writes: From the start of GIMP 2.8 there are rumors about Save vs. Export. It is a change with the past, but that has happened more times by changing versions. The first version of the GIMP that i started (i believe 1.2) came up with a single toolbox and nothing more. And i survived all the changes that came after that. To make the changes more visible for the users is it possible to add to the various Save options in the File Menu that this will happen in XCF format? As in: -- | File | || | New image | | ...| || | Save to XCF| | Save to XCF as ... | | ...| ? ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list Indeed. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Dominik Tabisz ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Fw:
First we need some more info: 1) What operating system are You using 2) Wchich version of GIMP - do You mean Gimp 2.0 ? Or Gimp 2.6 or 2.8 or something else. I can only gues that You mean Gimp 2.8 on some M$ Windows system ... probably You deleted some system files before and now system don't know what to remove. It's just gues i've forgoten where i lost my crystall ball. However if i guess correctly what happened, one proven way was to manually clean registry, and later remove unnecessary files. 2012/12/2, Stan Dawson swdjr...@verizon.net: - Original Message - From: Stan Dawson To: gimp-user-list-ow...@gnome.org Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 12:11 PM I am trying to remove GIMP2 from my computer, but when I click on REMOVE, I get a message error stating that File C is missing and it does not remove. Please tell me how to remove it. I don't use it and it is taking up too much space. Thank you, Stan Dawson PO Box 122 Kilmarnock, Virginia 22482-0122 ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Sticky state of windows in Gimp 2.8
hi it might be issue related to comunication between GIMP and Your window manager. Which one do You use? KDE, GNOME, LXDE, Fluxbox or something else? Please give us some more info: 1) Which window manager do You use 2) Which display manager do You use (gdm/kdm/xdm or other) 3) Have You tried to use GIMP in *any* other window manager. If yes, whether the problem still exist in other Wm. 2012/11/17, nitram2001 for...@gimpusers.com: I have recently upgraded to Fedora 17 and now have Gimp 2.8 as a consequence. As a user of Gnu/Linux I am used to using multiple workspaces, a separate workspace for each job in hand but have found that the behaviour of Gimp 2.8 is not to my liking. With Gimp set up in workspace 6 (say) the Gimp dialogs for layers, tools, tool options etc. appear in my other 5 workspaces cluttering them up. I have found no way to remove the sticky state of these little windows. I have no problem handling the sticky state with windows of any other application and I have had no problem with previous versions of Gimp. Please help me find a way to remove the sticky state from these windows. -- nitram2001 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Wacom pens with rotation supported ?
Olivier could you pleas tell whether You use this in GNU/Linux or other OS? I'm considering new tablet, that supports pen rotation but big problem is to find something that's both affordable and works with GNU/Linux Thanks Dominik 2012/5/14, Daniel Smith opened...@gmail.com: Since we're on this topic, does anyone have any recommendations for good artpad/pen sets to buy? Used, good price, etc? I have an old Wacom/Intuos1 pad, and have lost it's pen, and was thinking about finding a replacement, but on second thought I figured it's probably a waste of time and should look for a newer set that can make use of newer features? Thanks. Dan On 5/14/12, Gwenouille for...@gimpusers.com wrote: It's used for this one too. Your link does not work for me, but I know the Art Pen. I'm using it with the Wheel parameter. OK, thanks Olivier, that's great news ! -- Gwenouille (via gimpusers.com) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
