Re: In defence of Perl

2001-02-13 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Neil Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
   This is a plea for help. Here is the situation:
 
 [situation snipped]
 
   My belief is that the LAMP type route provides a very cost effective,
   portable and scalable solution but I concede that bigger backends are
   needed for volume transaction systems.
 
 Funnily enough I am about half way through an article for the new
 www.onlamp.com site that is quite relevant to your situation. I'll whip
 myself to get it finished soon.
 
   The help I need is in answering some questions:
 
   What big corporates are using perl in web development and
   how/for what ?
 
 Lots. In the last couple of weeks alone I've run across one operating stock
 exchange heavily built around Perl, and the content management system /
 e-marketplace hubstorm (www.hubstorm.com) is almost entirely Perl based.
 Neither are trivial applications, although I don't vouch for how effective
 they are or if Perl was the right tool to use.
 
 As one of the requirements listed was content management you can 
 through in the BBC, especially the interactive telly division. Heck, 
 they even gave a presentation at YAPC::Europe.
 

they even won a BAFTA for some of the stuff they (we) did with perl

http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net/pics/greg_bafta_bw.jpeg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: In defence of Perl

2001-02-13 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Simon Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 At 11:48 13/02/2001 +, you wrote:
 
 [snip]
 
 As one of the requirements listed was content management you can through 
 in the BBC, especially the interactive telly division. Heck, they even 
 gave a presentation at YAPC::Europe.
 
 Does anyone know if that presentation is available online anywhere ?
 

i might have it in one of a several 100Mb of wav files awaiting checking
and mp3ing

however, having been at the presentation i dont think it is what you need

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: VA?

2001-02-13 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  At 01:24 PM 13.2.2001 +, you wrote:
  Anyone have an opinion on VA?
  
  Virginia's nice but I like Massachusetts better. Too close to both
  AOL ground zero  American political hell ground zero
 
 Thpbpfpfpfpfft!
 
 Ok, so VA aren't evil incarnate. Anyone want to work with 'em? They're
 looking for a general purpose Linux gofer to do pre-sales stuff. 
 
 And Reading Room are still looking for a network/web/sysadmin wookie
 since the best candidate so far decided to stay put...he knows who he
 is...

wookie = big hairy loud 

shurely there is an abundance of london mongers who fit this role



-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: NY invasion, was Re: Conway Hall

2001-02-12 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Paul Mison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Yeah, 10 +- usual errors (people who didn't know and have changed their
 minds, people running out of cash, etc, etc).
 

there is even someone saying that they are hoping to get Oven to send
them to NY at some stage ;-)

Greg

(remember Ron and I may be up for the trip once some other
variables fall into place)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-02-05

2001-02-09 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Leon Brocard wrote:
  On Thursday, a London.pm Heretic Meeting happened in a lovely
  pub with a nice warm fire by the Thames. For the uninitiated,
  a Heretic Meeting happens when the first thursday of the month
  is the 1st. Heretic meetings thus happen on the 7th, and are
   ^^^
 8th. (For the summary in four weeks' time :-)
 

london.pm meetings happen on the day after the first wednesday
of the month - some misinformed people may have meetings on the
1st of the month occasionally, but what can i say? they are just
crazy!

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



heretics

2001-02-08 Thread Greg McCarroll


for those needing my mobile number to find there way to the
heretics meeting tonight, this will not be possible as i
have left my phone at home - well done me!

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: OT: Buffy (or not OT, depending on your point of view)

2001-02-08 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Tony Bowden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 11:20:58AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
  sounds like someone needs to buy the DVD and see if it comes with
  a cinema trailer
 
 But, where would one buy DVDs?
 

virgin megastores, hmv, wh smith, even woolies has them now

the highstreet is a wonderful place ;-)

oh and i suppose you could buy them online ..

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



No Subject

2001-02-07 Thread Greg McCarroll


reminder - heretics meeting tommorow night, email me if you need
directions or my mobile number

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re:

2001-02-07 Thread Greg McCarroll

* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:55:39AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
 
  I don't need directinos, but I _have_ forgotten to let you know that...
  er... my er... friend, yeah, that's it my friend, would like to come
  along to the meal if you're booking a table.
 
 What is your ... err ... friend's name?
 
 /me suggests that grep post a map on his website.
 

i havent found one yet - i spose i could do a streetmap ...


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: previous jobs

2001-02-05 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Redvers Davies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  Dammit, we are *not* third world!
 
 Highest rate of child poverty in the developed world.  An estimated 40%
 of the population have no healthcare.

where are you talking about Red, Indonesia? Ethyopia? China?

;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



heretics meeting

2001-02-05 Thread Greg McCarroll


"Kids let me tell you about another so-called ``wicked'' guy. He
 had long hair and some wild ideas. He didn't always do what
 other people thought was right. And that man's name was ...
 I forget. But the point is  I forget that, too.
 Marge you know who I'm talking about. He used to drive that
 blue car?"

Homer J. Simpson 
Episode : Homer the Heretic 


i've booked a table at the anchor for 12 people on thursday night at
6:30 - its a booked for a meal but we can stay and have a lot of 
beers afterwards, i'm getting a menu faxed over later

if someone can make sure spurkis knows about this - it would be a 
good thing.

the full name of the pub is not the wanchor as people who have
worked at FT.com would recognise, but in fact is `the anchor
at bankside', its in SE1 very near to London Bridge

more info can be found at 

http://www.cockney.co.uk/anchor.htm

i think we might have the table in a private room and the food is
reasonable and good, and a good night should be had by all

there is also an outside area and if it is above 0 degrees C,
we may go out for a quick sorting dance where we measure the 
cost of the algorithm by having a gulp of beer everytime you
are involved in a compare or swap operation (the sorting 
algorithm will be bubble sort and the list will initially be
in reverse order ;-) )

we may be entertaining Davydka Cross, Dave Cross' long lost russian
twin brother at the meeting, Dave will of course not be attending
this meeting as it would be an act of recognition of the validity
of the ``first day after the first wednesday of the month'' aka heretics
algorithm for the calculation of london.pm meetings

if people mail me off list to let me know if they are coming or 
not i can increase/decrease the booking size on wednesday

Greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Perl Books

2001-02-02 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Benjamin Holzman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 True, but there aren't many people who will assume that they can perform
 brain surgery just because they successfully applied a band-aid to a paper
 cut the week before.
 

www.trepanation.com ;-) [1]

Greg

[1] i haven't checked the URL so dont blame me if it turns out to be
kittie [;-)] porn



-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Free T-Shirts

2001-02-01 Thread Greg McCarroll



hurrah for the mayhem of foyles!

* mallum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 It seems that Foyles on Tottenham Crt Rd are giving away free orielly shirts.
 I got a Perl and a Linux one just by asking ( there are loads on some
 orielly display in there ) and not even purchasing anything.
 
 mallum
 http://10.am/Development/Perl
-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: the list

2001-01-31 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Michael Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 It's oh so quiet.
 
 After recent activity this is somewhat disconcerting.
 

everyone is probably reading up on ruby in preparation for it
taking over the world

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: London Community News 30/01/00

2001-01-30 Thread Greg McCarroll


LCN

much kudos to Dean for this , it is a fucking wonderful idea


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Video Tips

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 [1]philips 2000 format, years ahead of its time, turn the tapes over like
 an audio cassette, 8 hours per tape, perfect picture in still frame
 (due to video head mounted on a piezo slab)  earlies 80's tecnology!..
 ahhh .. and we got spit vhs instead .. ho hum.
 

don't look at bad technology that becomes the de facto choice as bad
technology, look at it as a catalyst to the next generation of
technology

Greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



fspi

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll


i got a shiny copy of Dave's book in the post on saturday, very nice
indeed

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: fspi

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 At Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:46:40 +, Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  * James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:12:01PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:

i got a shiny copy of Dave's book in the post on saturday, very 
nice indeed
   
   Where did you get it from so quickly? Direct from Manning?
  
  i'm assuming so, i never actually read the compliment slip, but
  it was sent from the US in some fancy red and white packaging
  that gave the impression of speedy delivery 
 
 Probably worth point out that Greg didn't actually order the book. He
 was sent a free copy by Manning for all the help he gave whilst the 
 book was being written.
 

i think i'll have to go and review it at amazon now i have a paper
copy , although the fact i might put in

*** THIS IS A GENUINE REVIEW NOT ONE INFLUENCED BY THE PUBLISHER ***

at the top and bottom, might not be in the spirit of receiving a
free book, so maybe i should avoid that

Greg
 
-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Technical Meeting Venues

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 At Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:54:26 +, Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  
  the minute i cross the river, i can feel grimness coming upon me
 
 AOL/ One of the big plus points for this jobs was that it was on the
 right (i.e. south) side of the river.
 
  Greg (who was surfing for flats in balham this weekend and spotted 
  one on dave's road ;-) )
 
 Do you know what number it was?
 

it doesnt say on the main website and the links down to the
fuller detail picture

its being let my sheraton law if thats any help

just think of the sitcom possibilities if i lived above you
Dave? heh? heh? ;-) ;-)

greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



33 mails

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll


how the f*** did you lot send 33 mails to this list between
when i left work and now?

sheesh

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Technical Meeting Venues

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote:
 
  From: Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 29 January 2001 15:34
 
   just think of the sitcom possibilities if i lived above you
   Dave? heh? heh? ;-) ;-)
 
  Bit tricky that. What with us living in a house and all that.
 
 
 We have seagulls on our roof, perhaps grep meant to be building a nest on
 your chimney ?
 

ok scratch that, the idea for the sitcom is i'm the lodger, dave had
to rent out his flat because he needed the cash --- err no, thats
a bit too far fetched even for a sitcom

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Meeting Reminder

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll


i'd like to point out that this is an EXCEPTIONAL social meeting
of London.pm due to MJD, the real meeting of course will be on
the day after the first wednesday of the month

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 There's a social meeting on Thursday 1st Feb (that's this coming
 Thursday).
 
 It will be in the Barrowboay  Banker at the southern end of London
 Bridge. There's a map on the web site.
 
 Mark-Jason Dominus will be joining us and I think that Simon Cozens
 is thinking of coming along too.
 
 Dave...
-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: 33 mails

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 grep complained:
 
  
  how the f*** did you lot send 33 mails to this list between when i
  left work and now?
  
  sheesh
 
 Practice?  We learn quickly, o wise teacher.
 

its ok, i figured out why, some dum-shee (scottish word, ask
Dave Can, who got to see my Scotty McClue video one night) asked
a question about emacs rc files

oh, you should all no, i'm going to be working my arse of
the next few days and then finishing with a big presentation
on thursday - i then have friday off

this coupled with my relative sobrietary during january means
we are going to have to go for it big time on thursday night

if i can have 2 teams of 3 before tomorow (tuesday) night
i'll come up with a drinking game/quiz based around 
perl/london.pm/computing trivia

how about Dave Cross and MJD as team captains?

gre[gp]

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Meeting Reminder

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Greg's obviously started drinking again a couple of days too early. He
 knows full well that official london.pm social meetings are on the first
 Thursday of the month. This has _always_ been the case and I have no
 intention of changing it now.
 

as i said earlier in the month ...

*puts hands over ears* la, la, la, i can't hear you , la la la 

 If Greg wants to organise an extra meeting on the 8th for the McCarroll
 heretics then that's fine by me, but he should probably be giving out
 some information about the venue at some point soon if he wants anyone
 to turn up.
 

The Anchor, near London Bridge, 8/1/2001, starting 6.30 ish ;-)

(ask me for directions if you dont' know it)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: 33 mails

2001-01-29 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 12:23:43AM +, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
  if i can have 2 teams of 3 before tomorow (tuesday) night
  i'll come up with a drinking game/quiz based around 
  perl/london.pm/computing trivia
  
  how about Dave Cross and MJD as team captains?
 
 I thought you were planning to save this kind of stuff for the heretics
 meeting on the 8th.
 

a heretic is not just for the 8th of a month, they are for the whole year

anyway, i've got about 10 questions written already , i'm thinking that
if a team gets all the answers wrong in a round their penalty is to
have to drink .. non alchoholic drinks for the next round!


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Video Tips

2001-01-28 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, you wrote:
  Here's a top tip. Don't try to video two hours of programs on an hour and a 
  half of video tape.
 
 can't you just gzip it?
 

only if its a GNU video recorder

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Technical Meeting Venues

2001-01-27 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Doesn't bi-monthly mean every tw months?
 

yes, and if there is any doubt, i recommend looking up ``bi'' on
your favourite search engine ;-)


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-26 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Richard Clamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:20:28PM +, Dave Cross wrote:
  It seems that mail-archive.com have been archiving our list for some
  time and anyone who knows about mail-archive can find anything posted
  to our list.
 
 I've got no real problem with having my contributions publically archived,
 the list being open to all anyway.
 
 That said I would have liked to have been informed of it when subscribing to
 the list (or for those of us that have been here for donkeys, when it
 started getting archived,) just so that I could be sure it was happening.
 

how about if we notified the list everytime someone subscribed or 
unsubscribed



-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: [uri@sysarch.com: free copy of data munging with perl]

2001-01-26 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  
  this is forwarded from manning and they are offering each pm group a
  free copy of data munging with perl by dave cross.
 
 Hey! Now Dave can have his very own free copy of DMWP!
 

and we can all sign it!



-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-26 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 If no-one objects I will put this in place this weekend.  I guess it will
 result in ~ 10 excess messages a week.
 

with current volumen, this is a drop in the pond

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-26 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Dave Cross wibbled:
 
  The other week I dug out the original comp.lang.perl.misc post.
 
 I think I have a recording of someone bashing a stick near a big black
 rectangle somewhere too...
 
 Is this a collective attempt to crash mail archiving bots by posting so
 much that they get overloaded and fall over? ;-)
 

they wouldn't fall over if ..

they were written using java on a windows platform and using
DB2 as the database

;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-26 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   I sez:
  
   Is this a collective attempt to crash mail archiving bots by posting so
   much that they get overloaded and fall over? ;-)
   
  
  Then grep sez:
 
  they wouldn't fall over if ..
  
  they were written using java on a windows platform and using
  DB2 as the database
  
  ;-)
 
 Depends if the list was is set to munge reply-to or not really, doesn't
 it.  And we know this kind of stuff only happens on the first thurday (not
 the day after the first wednesday) of the month.
 

i'd love to chat about this, but i've got some goats going over my bridge
at 9

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-25 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Robin Houston ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:14:08PM +, Leon Brocard wrote:
o grow up
 
 Hey! No need to get defensive till you lose the vote :-)
 

i vote for no vote, keep things as they are

if people object to their views being public, don't post them in what
is a public forum - if this is still a problem, then the question should
be should london.pm become a private forum, with people being added after
a vote - this smells fishy to me ;-) ;-) ;-) [1]

personally, the day london.pm becomes a private, invite only forum, i'll
be off to london-public.pm's mailing list (this may make london.pm even 
more popular for those sensitive to signal/noise) - as for google knowing 
too much about you, welcome too 1984+17

i saw a good post today on abou, someone was complaigning that the older
sci-fi books were crap because they were too close to reality (they
didn't realise the significance of this and so were flamed, the flame
got to abou)

grep - i was called this by a non-london.pmer recently

[1] you++ to anyone who gets the joke apart from stevem

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-25 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 I must admit I don;t particularly like the idea of someone else holding
 this info though .. I mean .. its like 'ours' innit .. but i have no

i'm sure you could do something in your sig, along the lines of

this email is copyright of robin szemeti , archiving of this email
is strictly prohibetted

and then call them up/fax them/go sit in their lobby/email them etc.
telling them how they shouldnt be doing this

better still if everybody did this for just one or two messages
a year it would cause chaos

muhahahahahahahaha



-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-25 Thread Greg McCarroll

* James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 To make it harder for google to find you - change your name Prince style.
 

good idea!

- greg of wales


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



No Subject

2001-01-22 Thread Greg McCarroll


is it still 12:30 at the new world today?

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Conslutancy

2001-01-22 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Andy Wardley wrote:
 
  So without wishing to start another holy war, is it possible to change
  the mailing list configuration to have a more sensible default Reply-to?
 
 rant
 I have arguments with Leon about this. He usually quotes 'Reply To
 munging considered harmful'
 (http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html) but as I keep trying to
 point out to him this document is bollocks.
 
 The main statemests it makes are ...
 

i'm ignoring all your points 

reply-to having the address of the sender is the right thing,

it means when you reply to a message you reply to author of
that message, when you reply-all you reply to all

its just the right thing

so there 




Re: Conslutancy

2001-01-22 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Greg McCarroll wrote:
 
  reply-to having the address of the sender is the right thing,
  
  it means when you reply to a message you reply to author of
  that message, when you reply-all you reply to all
 
 No. When you reply-all it replies to the sender *AND* the list. So the
 sender gets two copies of everything. Which is just fricking irritating
 *AND* a waste of bandwidth.

la la la la *has hands over ears* i cant here you, la la la la

 Yes I could have a procmail rule to delete duplicate message IDs but
 some places I work (like here) I can't use procmail. 

i can and do

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels
 capable of supporting such an event.  It's quite amazing to us, in
 fact, how difficult it has been to find a place to hold it in London.
 

Really? Why does this not surprise about 10~20 people on this list? ;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Redvers Davies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels
  capable of supporting such an event.  It's quite amazing to us, in
  fact, how difficult it has been to find a place to hold it in London.
 
 One of the hotels in London I have had dealings with has conference facilities
 and over 2000 rooms.  I could look up their details should you wish.

as long as its not that god awful place above ebookers, near russel square 
- the name escapes me, but i could well believe it has somewhere approaching
2000 (shit) rooms in both of the wings  

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Andrew Bowman wrote:
  
  From: "Nathan Torkington" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Timing in London is hard, because there aren't very many hotels
   capable of supporting such an event.  It's quite amazing to us, in
   fact, how difficult it has been to find a place to hold it in London.
  
  What sort of numbers are we talking about then?
  
  If you're prepared to consider locations a little out of central London
  there are lots of large hotels around Heathrow that have sizeable conference
  type facilities (also handy for the airport!).
 
 What about Brighton ;-)
 

potential london clients will be put off dealing with a company not in london

i was thinking about consultancies, and there are really two types and
two types of person who want to be create each type. and those two types
can be summarised as the two Steves, the question is what are people trying
to do - create a Jobs or a Wozniak consultancy?

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:22:07PM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
 
  FWIW, I know my mother has booked some largish meetings outside of
  London.  Of course, I don't remember offhand how large, or, for that
  matter, what kind of numbers you're looking at.
 
 Good point.  Sometimes it's hard to remember that there is life outside
 the M25.  Errm ... if you *really* want to have it in the UK, consider
 manchester and birmingham.  Both have international airports, large hotels
 and conference centres.  I expect Edinburgh does too although I'm not sure
 if there are direct flights to .us - but that's OK, there's no direct
 flights from .eu to Monterey :-)

or better still consider Dublin or Edinburgh 

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Perl/MySQL based forums

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:33:09PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 No, I'm not going to code a forum package by hand. 
go on dave, it cant be that hard 
   
   Having done it a few times, it *isn't* that hard...
  
  I'm playing with mwforum right now. Seems OK.
 
 Aside from all the inline HTML.
 
 ARGH! When will people learn!
 

it got the job done in the first n'th generation? yes? we'll solve
that problem in the n+1'th generation of computing and introduce
another batch of new ones



-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Perl/MySQL based forums

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote:
  On 21 Jan 2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
   Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:33:09PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
  * Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   No, I'm not going to code a forum package by hand. 
  go on dave, it cant be that hard 
 Having done it a few times, it *isn't* that hard...
I'm playing with mwforum right now. Seems OK.
   Aside from all the inline HTML.
   ARGH! When will people learn!
  I was in the process of converting it to TT when i lost a load of my work
  at oven (forgot to follwo symlinks when I tar gzipped home).
 I always had that problem until I stuffed everything in CVS :)

it's a sign of how we have not moved away from the current computing
metaphor to something else - boo to filesystems bring on object storage!




-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: TPC5

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  
  potential london clients will be put off dealing with a company not in london
  

 I think Location in this day an age is a little irrelivant.  The choice
 will be made on quality of service - not where the office is based. 
 

... and all the clients will be logically thinking young people. with
no biases and no predefined stereotypes. they will make sure they pay
there bills on time and they will not be trying to fuck you from day 1.

unfortunatly any startup company that is not backed with serious capital
needs to accept almost every job it can get, and if it cant get most
of them due to some middleaged business man's discrimination against
it - due to the fact that the office is in brighton, or they don't
have an office or they don't wear suits or whatever, it won't survive.

i agree with you logically but i see a big difference in reality.

 The south coast has a very high number of nu media companies - and
 apparently Worthing is the most profitable town / area in the UK.

however, the major (only?) resource that this theoretical company has is
people and most of them are london based anyway so anywhere outside the
M25 is probably not going to leverage the main resource and the company
would be dead from day #1

however on a trivia note, i'd be willing to bet that _the_ city makes the most 
profit per area in the UK, but thats a trivia point


 It is often easier to get to some London Locations from Brighton than it
 is from London.
 
  i was thinking about consultancies, and there are really two types and
  two types of person who want to be create each type. and those two types
  can be summarised as the two Steves, the question is what are people trying
  to do - create a Jobs or a Wozniak consultancy?
 
 You've lost me there ?
 

ok, ignoring the other figures and concetrating on the two steves ...

Woz was an A class engineer and C/D class business guy 
Jobs was a B class engineer but also a B class business guy
 and marketeer (bullshitter)

if they seperatly formed companys Woz would create the most technically
brilliant corporatopia (i just made that up ;-) ), Jobs would make the
most money - i'm certainly arguing in this ``debate'' (although that
implies too much conflict) that job's way is best others may feel woz's
way is best

Greg   


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: distributed.net

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:36:25AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
  
  Dave's new SUPER CHARGED TURBO NUTTER 2001 pc reminded me of the good
  old days of distributed.net. Is anyone still participating in this?
  I've just threw some keys at PMU but it appears they are dead in
  the water along with the rest of us. Is it time we joined up with
  some team like PMU and had a single Perl team?
 
 I've still got the powerbook churning away here.  oddly, though, it's
 been having issues connecting to the server, so I don't get to update
 that frequently. :-/
 
 Go PMU!!!
 

if you could email me the password to PMU i'd be grateful, also what
is the focus of PMU - OGR or RC5?



-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: ArsDigita working practices (was: Big Macs v The Naked Chef -- )

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

y* Michael Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 09:05:43PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
  Ok, it's trolling a bit, but their main use seems to be where
  you don't want to bother to do proper nonblocking IO...
 
 quick web search
 
 They're apparently faster. And make it easier to share data.


aside from the whole LWP aspect, i think the main appeal is they are
a defined art - unlike the matre'd/minicab controller element of 
forked process management

we really want standardisation of technology interfaces in the industry,
and threads go a little towards that - oh and a law that alows be to
go around and shooting people who work in IT and i deep unworthy[1].

Greg

[1] i'm willing to limit this law to semi-automatic weapons - i'm that
reasonable

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: ArsDigita working practices (was: Big Macs v The Naked Chef -- )

2001-01-21 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Michael Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  we really want standardisation of technology interfaces in the industry,
  and threads go a little towards that - oh and a law that alows be to
  go around and shooting people who work in IT and i deep unworthy[1].
 
 I do agree with this part.


the standardisation on the bloody massacre part?


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Hardware Upgrade Fund

2001-01-20 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Building reliability is probably your best aim: does it have a UPS? does it
 have a RAID 1/0 config? Dual PSUs? Tape drive  backup policy? Those things
 are way more important than a faster chip or RAM.
 

your right of course, however all of those things are more expensive
and in some cases involve disgarding existing equipment

and at the end of the day its a hobby machine that currently is lucky
to have an average CPU usage of 0.1% per hour

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: [Job] BOFH wanted was: Re: Red Hat worm discovered

2001-01-19 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Steve Mynott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  * Aaron Trevena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   
   Also many hackers have more business sense than their MDs - look at
   success of projects started by hackers or engineers versus that of those
   started by MBAs or middle managers..
   
  
  business sense != project sucess
 
 why not?  I would have thought similar skills were involved in both?
 

i used to think so, but having seen business ``hackers'' at work i have
seen the light. there is a breed of person who is so skilled at hacking
the business system/structures especially inter-business arrangements
that they have an entirely different skillset

looking back at Aaron's post i agree with him on middle management but
not wrt good MD's

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Consultancy company was [Job] BOFH wanted was: Re: Red Hat worm discovered

2001-01-19 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Thats were a few people have gone wrong lately then ;-)
 

yup

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Consultancy company was [Job] BOFH wanted was: Re: Red Hat worm discovered

2001-01-19 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Michael Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:32:16AM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
  On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:42:11AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
yes and no. If you need to do an allnighter and its unavoidable (due to a
client suddenly changing ther mind) then theres no problem doing it ..
just charge em bigtime!
   nope this is where your pimp/MD should of tied up the contract watertight,
   so if they change their mind the deadline changes
  What do you do where this is not the case, other than think about finding
  a new job?
 
 Although, thinking about it, I can also note that the "find a new job" approach
 seems to work...

write a suggestions document of where the project management and
management functions are going wrong

if they ignore it leave

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



apologies

2001-01-18 Thread Greg McCarroll


Apologies one and all,

i am not going to be able to make it tonight, today is my first day
back at work after some flu like illness. i had hoped to make it 
tonight but currently feel like matt wrights code,

see you all at the next meeting,

Greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: [Job] BOFH wanted was: Re: Red Hat worm discovered

2001-01-18 Thread Greg McCarroll

* John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Hmmm, does sound good though.
 

it all depends what you mean, do you mean a proper consultancy or
a bunch of people getting together to share accounting/marketting?

if its a proper consultancy, you'd have to wear suits, be polite
and be in work for 9 in the morning

if you were a contractor joining it you could expect a 50%+ pay cut

instead of recruiters taking a skim, the running of the company
including advertising, management etc. would all eat some of the cash

also you'd need to focus it by problem areas not by language

having said all of this, if its a later its a good idea

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: [Job] BOFH wanted was: Re: Red Hat worm discovered

2001-01-18 Thread Greg McCarroll

* dcross - David Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 From: Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 18 January 2001 11:42
  
   What sort of hourly/daily rate does an average PM perl programmer get
   anyway?
  
  Anything from 30 upwards to the sky depending on the client. And the
  programmer. And the task.
 
 Sounds a tad low to me. I've never contracted as a Perl programmer for less
 than 50/hr. Normally I'd estimate at about 500/day. I'd have thought that
 if we were selling ourselves as top-notch Perl consultants (Dave H's
 "getting it right" idea), then it would be more like double that.
 

yes, but if it was a proper consultancy youd be expected to write off some
of that occasionally and also maybe have some centralised support

of the course the real cash comes from ongoing support contracts

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: [Job] BOFH wanted was: Re: Red Hat worm discovered

2001-01-18 Thread Greg McCarroll

* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:56:43PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
 
  there is a big question here, do people want to create a small business
  with a few perl programmers all on largish salaries or do people want
  to create a proper consulting business aiming to see it grow
 
 Both, of course :-)
 

yip, but you have to make a choice

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Consultancy company was [Job] BOFH wanted was: Re: Red Hat worm discovered

2001-01-18 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 People (no particular order):
 
  ==   
  = Pimp   =   =  Accountant  =
  ==   
 
  ==   =
  = BOFH   =   = Security Guru =
  ==   =
 
  ===  ===
  = Perl Gurus' =  = Perl Trainee Gurus  =
  ===  ===

i'd add an MD/CEO who would initially do a lot of the
pimping, the accountant could initially also be outsourced.
the BOFH and Security Guru could be rolled into one.
i'd also hire non-Perl programmers so that you didn't
just have one leg to the stool

 Money:
   Base salary and split proffit according to which category your in.

founders split say 50% of the equity, 25% reserved for latecomers
and 25% pencilled for VC types

contractors could expect to take a 50 to 75% drop in salary

 Open source / clients:
   Create projects for open source community (sell to clients
   with support). When not assigned to a specific money 
   making project or client create next project to OS and 
   make money from.

agreed!

   Create client base with support contracts.

also create partner arrangements, i can think of at least 3
big companies i maybe could arrange partnerships with, that in some
cases would double the daily rate for consultancy

 Location
snip ;-)

 have to pay them back with interest and stuff.
equity surely? ;-)


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Consultancy company was [Job] BOFH wanted was: Re: Red Hat worm discovered

2001-01-18 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Tony Bowden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 04:42:55PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
   have to pay them back with interest and stuff.
  equity surely? ;-)
 
 Yes. But if you're successful the "interest" rate is huge ;)
 
 But if you're not, well, they lose the money and not you.
 
 FWIW It's much easier to negotiate with VCs if you're already
 well established and actually have revenue and commitments and
 stuff
 

well, this is all getting a bit close to the grain for me, if anyone
wants to discuss the possibilities of a non-perl specialised arena
consultancy feel free to to email me off list, however there may be
nasty NDA's involved


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: PIMB T-shirts

2001-01-17 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  snip discussion about legal aspects re using a camel smoking a joint
 on a t-shirt.
 
 If these are private individuals selling t-shirts, may I suggest just
 omitting the word 'perl' from anywhere on the t-shirt. Then O'Reilly's
 trademark issues don't even come into effect (See page 'iv' of Programming
 Perl for trademark discussion) and it's really, really got nothing to do
 with them.

besides, ``Icon'' smoking joint has been done to death, hash bang perl is
original

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: PIMB T-shirts

2001-01-17 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  On a tangentially related point - I've just overheard someone in the
  office mention the rumour that "Puff, the magic dragon" was "written
  by someone who was smoking a joint". I guess I'm just surprised that
  there are people to whom this fact isn't obvious.
 
 It's not obvious! I listened to this song over and over again when I was
 young and at no point did it seem at all drug induced. It's perfectly good
 childrens song. Down with the conspiracy theories!
 

damn, this fact is in some comedy film --- ah thats right its meet 
the parents, with Robert De Niro as an ex-CIA guy who is equally
surprised at PtMD being about this.

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Feelers for London Open Source Convention

2001-01-17 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 At Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:58:25 +, Tony Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:54:50PM -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
   We're planning a London Open Source Convention.  The dates we're
   looking hard at now are August 20-23.  Are there any obvious clashes
  
  Depends on how quickly people can get back from Vancouver:
http://www.geekcruises.com/home/ss_home.html
 
 Now that _could_ be a major problem. Damian, MJD and Randal are all
 on that cruise.
 

all we'd need to do is hire some terrorists to take over the cruise
ship and sale it across to london - of course someone should make
sure we shoot the cook before the operation starts, oh and fire
a couple of rounds into the birthday cake while your at it.

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Forwarded : [announce] two new languages (fwd)

2001-01-17 Thread Greg McCarroll


havent had a chance ot look at these yet, but they sound like the
sort of thing some of you sick^H^H^H^Himaginative people would enjoy


- Forwarded message from Jeff Pinyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

X-Authentication-Warning: mccarroll.demon.co.uk: Host [127.0.0.1] claimed to be 
localhost
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:57:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeff Pinyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [announce] two new languages (fwd)
Precedence: bulk

HQ9 is precious.

-- 
Jeff "japhy" Pinyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pobox.com/~japhy/
CPAN - #1 Perl Resource  (my id:  PINYAN)   http://search.cpan.org/
PerlMonks - An Online Perl Community  http://www.perlmonks.com/
The Perl Archive - Articles, Forums, etc.   http://www.perlarchive.com/

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 02:51:01 -0800
From: Brian Raiter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [announce] two new languages

An enterprising programmer by the name of Cliff Biffle recently sent
me email (apparently he found me via my Brainfuck web page) telling me
about two new languages he's created, and I thought the list should
know about them:

1. Tangle http://www.cliff.biffle.org/tangle/, so called because it
   is meant to encourage spaghetti-structure; and
2. HQ9+ http://www.cliff.biffle.org/hq.html. In hindsight, I can see
   that this is a language that has been long overdue in coming.

b

**Majordomo list services provided by PANIX URL:http://www.panix.com**
**To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe ny" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]**

- End forwarded message -
-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Feelers for London Open Source Convention

2001-01-17 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Also, as it is a modern cruise ship, we will use Grep's l33t hacking skills
 to gain control of all the automated systems from his Psion 5, whereupon we

don't get me started on PDA's being used to ``hack'' systems, e.g. that
james bond film where they use a CE device and i've seen palm pilots
used - now if it was EPOC say a nice R380 (with non-standard ROM)
sure, but PalmOS, CE .. nah

Greg - who is easily bought

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Feelers for London Open Source Convention

2001-01-17 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Mike Wyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
 
 * Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  Also, as it is a modern cruise ship, we will use Grep's l33t hacking skills
  to gain control of all the automated systems from his Psion 5, whereupon we
 
 don't get me started on PDA's being used to ``hack'' systems, e.g. that
 james bond film where they use a CE device and i've seen palm pilots
 used - now if it was EPOC say a nice R380 (with non-standard ROM)
 sure, but PalmOS, CE .. nah
 
 Psions are eminently capable of hacking- I use my Ericsson rebadged 5MX
 as a pocketable terminal emulator at work- plugs straight into a serial
 port with decent terminal support. Ideal for administering UPSs, remote
 power control units, and machines with the system administrator shell
 running on the serial port.
 

the upcoming Nokia communicator, with the colour screen and the EPOC
operating system is what i'm waiting for. especially as it can now
download other EPOC programs to run on it. very nifty indeed, but
i would say that.

Greg 

(disclosure : Greg works for Symbian currently)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: PIMB T-shirts

2001-01-17 Thread Greg McCarroll

* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 [snip lengthy Puff tMD discussion]
 
 Well, for what it's worth, I just called a friend of mine who knew
 Peter Yarrow while growing up, and although she has never asked him, I
 have requested that she do so if she speaks to him.
 
 dave, getting this settled.
 

ah the joy of 7 degrees of seperation

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Kung Foo and PIMB

2001-01-15 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 P.S. PINE may be silly, but the multiple reply option rocks.
 

err *clickity click*, guess what i just discovered mutt could do ;-)


* Aaron Trevena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 This reminds me of the conversation Case, norm  I had after crouching
 

cool name Case - sorry this was just a bad attempt to justify my
experimental use of replying to multiple emails

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: OT : DVD

2001-01-15 Thread Greg McCarroll

* mallum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 I've seen this in electronics botique on Oxford Street.
 

as in the DVD version to be run on a DVD player? as for it being bad gameplay
i don't really care i just want it for historic sake - if i wanted gameplay
i'd play NetHack, phear me and my B,Fp,+3 BDSM ;-)

   

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: OT : DVD

2001-01-15 Thread Greg McCarroll

* James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 You can't beat marble madness for old arcade games though...
 and it runs nicely in MAME.
 

apparently its one of the most in demand video game cabinet/controller
combo's as the whell broke so much

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Access Control Lists and Functions

2001-01-15 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Andy Wardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Jan 15,  1:50pm, Simon Wistow wrote:
  Something like that, probably called it Symbol::ACL or summat. I'll
  stick it in my todo list right after Flash stuff, Mail::Hotmail,
  Net::IP2LL, Fuky widget set thingy, WMLScript compiler in Perl and
  learning Japanese.
 
 I started learning Japanese when I joined Canon as they were offering
 free lessons to all research staff.  I stopped soon after.
 

I started learning Japanese when the NI administration decided to teach
it to joint classes of catholic children and protestant children. Hence
it was a good way to meet a brand new batch of girls. I stopped soon after.
 

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Access Control Lists and Functions

2001-01-15 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Matthew Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 In my case, Japanese was very much the latter.  I have deep respect 
 for anyone who can master it.
 
 The only Japanese I know:
 
 "Anata no zubon wa taihen kirena desu!"
 

the only japanese i know is - 

hi, i don't think i've spoke to you before, i'm greg 
X
why thats a lovely name
X
oh really, what do you think of this japanese class
X
yes i have exactly the same opinion as you
X
etc 

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Access Control Lists and Functions

2001-01-15 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Tony Bowden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 04:53:57PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
  I started learning Japanese when the NI administration decided to teach
  it to joint classes of catholic children and protestant children. Hence
  it was a good way to meet a brand new batch of girls. I stopped soon after.
 
 Hey ... I never got opportunities like that!
 

well you had to a particular ``sensitive'' and ``caring'' individual,
able to deal with the harsh realities of the ``enforced prejudices''

 Was this only out in strange places? 

Ballymena is not a strange place! But i think it was across N.I. even
the more backward places such as Cullybacy, Carnlough and of course
Belfast

 Or just after/before my time?
 

way after your time Tony, way way way after --- just the hip young
things like me got this sort of thing (this is my attempt to hang
on the every slipping idea that i am still young)

anyway back to watching Detroit Rock City

Greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: PIMB T-shirts

2001-01-15 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 "David H. Adler" wrote:
 
  Shall I enquire at NY.pm tomorrow about demand?
 
 Yup. Might eb up for doing anohter run if necessary.
 
 Plus I have some other ideas.

Apparently Amsterdam.pm are looking for a design for YAPC::Europe 2001 ;-)

however, having said that, still like the # , ! , perl one ;-)


 

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



OT : DVD

2001-01-13 Thread Greg McCarroll


Did I hear correctly a rumour recently that you could currently on
in the near future get Dragons Lair on DVD. For those of you unfamiliar
with it Dragons Lair was a laser disk based game where you only had to 
hit one or two buttons each scene. I can't see a reason it couldn't
be done on DVD somehow.

While talking about it, i have a very very old memory of it being
the cover story in computer and video game annual or some such

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net




Re: Mailman in Perl (Re: the list is dead, long live the list)

2001-01-12 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Aaron Trevena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Following  the interest in rope/pope, etc perhaps it would be an idea for
 some of the more perl / oss oriented companies in london (or wherever) to
 agree to take part in the project on a semi official basis - much of what
 the work that the london and UK companies do is replicated because of lack
 of comunications and worry over company secrets and competition.
 
 If a handful of london companies can put together a press release saying
 that they are supporting or backing the project with time, money, services
 in lieu, etc then it would be a publicity coup and get the ball rolling.
 

the first thing they could offer to do is to host the final rpms/tar.gz's

what about the actual mechanics of putting rope together? i'm assuming
we'd create a /usr/local/Rope, build the latest stable perl in there,
then configure apache for mod_perl etc and install it under there as 
well, the the other modules.

finally is it enough to simply tar.gz /usr/local/Rope and tag it
with the architecture details

we would probably need some final install program to be run, that
would handle the local details of the system - such as what user
to run apache as

comments? suggestions?

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Pubs! (was: RE: Forthcoming Meetings - Summary)

2001-01-11 Thread Greg McCarroll

* dcross - David Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Whilst exploring this area at lunchtime I found a pub called the Elusive
 Camel. 
 I don't know what it's like outside, but further investigation has
 revealed that there are others in Victoria and Waterloo. Has anyone tried
 them? Should we investigate further?

i drank in the elusive camel on occasion near victoria, its ok, its
an office crowd with a wicker chair style deco, i get the feeling
however they wouldn't like 20 drunk geeks - not quite cool enough
if you know what i mean

its the type of pub that turns into some peoples idea of hell when it
is office party season


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Technical Meeting Agenda

2001-01-11 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 XML::Schema - Andy
 

can we finish this with some sort of SIG meeting on XML::Scheme
seeing as its all just ideas in the fevoured mind of Mr Wardley
so far, i'm sure there are the usual suspect who'd like to vent
their own opinions
 
 Hopefully it'll all be over by 9:30 and we can all bugger off to the
 nearest hostelry.

ack, if i'm going to speak i'll have to allow myself a one beer
ration


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: the list is dead, long live the list

2001-01-11 Thread Greg McCarroll

* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:07:20PM +, Andy Wardley wrote:
 
  In all fairness, I have to say that mailman is an *excellent* mailing
  list manager.
 
 So why haven't you reimplemented it in perl?  :)
 

previous_comment delivery="gentle" 

because we are the perl community, all we ever do is talk or if you are
lucky work on personal projects

/previous_comment

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



XML::Schema, YAPC::Europe, mod_perl, Camel Visit, !RANT!

2001-01-11 Thread Greg McCarroll

* David Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 "David H. Adler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:07:20PM +, Andy Wardley wrote:
  
   In all fairness, I have to say that mailman is an *excellent* mailing
   list manager.
  
  So why haven't you reimplemented it in perl?  :)
 
 As an XML and perl based application server?
 

don't you go thinking about that Dave, your pencilled in to delivering
this mod_perl solutions website you spoke about perviously ;-)

it seems to me at the last technical meeting we had a lot of enthusiasm
for this, and i'd guess we'll have a lot of enthusiasm for the XML::Schema
stuff this time - what we need to do is to form SIG's of london.pm to
drive these project forward

so as far as i see it - we have the following projects to be carried out
by london.pm and others ...

Caml (i'll leave that typo as it might get mjd excited) Visit  - David Cross
Completion of account creation for initial donators, 
 establishment of a administration committee and setting
 criteria for new donators - Jo + D.Cross
The Mod Perl Evangelist Site   - Dave Hodge..
The Final YAPC::Europe 2000 Site   - me + LB + JP

i'm pretty sure that these are the tasks we have at the minute as a 
group/community

time_out

ok the above seem's pretty anal but i get the feeling we need to 
add a bit of `` `` project management '' '' [1] to the group for 
the benefit of Perl - and this is a subject i'd love to see a
thread on

/time_out

ok yes i know, this is whole mail has probably been purely been caused by
my lower alchohol levels for january, but i can't help it - goddamnit i
love perl and i love london.pm and i want london.pm to work to help perl

-greg

[1] double double quotes to indicate how much removed this is from the 
crap some of us suffer at work

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: the list is dead, long live the list

2001-01-11 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 From: "Andy Wardley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  In all fairness, I have to say that mailman is an *excellent* mailing
  list manager.
 
 Yes it is. Majordomo is the wrong choice for the 21st century.
 
 Once again I'll offer to run the list on euro.pm.org but if y'all'd rather
 debate stuff go ahead :-)


speaking from a personal opinion 

its a kind offer Paul, but it really should be run off the london server
(currently) penderel.state51.co.uk (thanks state51!) - we've invested
in the beatie and it would be a shame to see it not being used

for instance i've logged on and seen it with 0% CPU usage, why don't
we run at least the distributed net client on it - well the reason
is we need organisation of the running of it, jo's deserves a 
sainthood (or the female version of it) for what she has done so far
but we need to organise it properly - anyway see the other mail i sent
recently

thanks again for the offer!

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Perl commandments

2001-01-10 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  Thou shalt optimise for programmer time unless absolutely necessary,
 
 Thou shalt optimise for programmer time unless O(x(n))  O(y(n)) and n is

what are O(x(n)) and O(y(n)), i'm not familiar with the x and y notation

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Perl commandments

2001-01-10 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  Err... Twice as fast is still twice as fast when it's running on a
  processor that's twice as fast as it would have been. I now can't
  remember where I read a fascinating piece on the value of more
  efficient algorithms as computers got faster. But it was worth
  reading. It was by that guy. Y'know, the guy who wrote that paper. 
 

ah, but its half the difference and thats whats important in this context,
besides i think we'll all agree we are not talking about magnitudes of
difference in this advice

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Perl commandments

2001-01-10 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Peter Corlett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
  ok, but it gets more interesting as take into account moores law that
  reduces the effectiveness of optmisation by halving the improvement of the
  optimization every year [...]
 
 This depends. If you're just doing an optimisation that changes one O(N)
 algorithm for another, then you're probably better off with the most clear
 version and wait for Moore's Law to help. Cycle-pinching optimisation
 doesn't really gain much anyway.
 
 [Mind you, I suspect that index and the equivalent regexen may have
 different O() scores. Discuss.]
 
 However, the problem is with programmers that don't really understand
 algorithms and implement something the "obvious" way, e.g. O(N^2) instead of
 O(NlogN) then this is not going to help when you attempt to scale your
 website or whatever to a million users instead of a test set of five.
 

the best way to do this, if you see something is N^2 is to figure out
how you could do it with a sort and hey presto it usually can be turned
into NlogN+N .. NlogN


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Perl commandments

2001-01-09 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  * Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:25:18AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
 6.) regular expressions are not the only way to code, length and
 substr are in the language for a reason

Also index.  These two snippets are equivalent:
  if($foo=~/foo/) { ... }
  if(index($foo, 'foo')!=-1) { ... }
I always want to do just plain if(index(...)) though.
   
   ISTR that (for weird reasons), the regex version of that is faster.
  
  but of course we don't (shouldn't) program perl for program time
  optimization but for programmer time optimization ;-)
 
 So the regex wins on all counts then. Faster, clearer, shorter, easier
 to maintain. The list goes on.
 
nope daves was a bad example

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Perl 6

2001-01-09 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 We're going to use RFCs for future additions to Perl, we just need to
 find some good filters that will prevent them from consuming
 everyone's time.

how about adding a field on the RFC template such as, ``forum initially 
discussed in'' - then encourage people that before they submit an RFC
they should of had it discussed in an open forum such as P5P, #perl
or even their local (or favourite) Perl monger list.

this has the ( devious ) side effect of gently spamming some people
about issues for Perl 6 hence getting more pairs of eyeballs on the
development and design of the beastie

Greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Forthcoming Meetings - Summary

2001-01-08 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Robert Shiels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
   dcross - David Cross wrote:
  
If I don't hear any objections by the end of tomorrow, I'm
going to appoint Simon as official pub organiser and suggest
we try the BBB for the Feb meeting (the McCarroll heretics
can, of course, have their meeting the following week wherever
they want).
  
 I'm not particularly keen on going to London Bridge. I come from Slough and
 this will reduce my drinking time by at least half and hour I'd estimate
 :( I also usually combine my trip into That London with a  visit to the PC
 Bookshop in Sicilian Avenue or Virgin Megastore on TCR, both walking
 distance.
 
 I'll submit to the popular vote of course, though a central London pub would
 be easier if we have to change. Why don't people like the PO?
 

have we ever tried reservin tables in PO?

 --
 Robert
 
 
-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: German Perl Workshop

2001-01-08 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Greg McCarroll wrote:
  oh well i've just got another 4.5 days (ish) of drinking left before
  its dry january - apart from time during the month of january spent
  abroad or places i can claim are abroad
 
 Ah, so you'll be spending a lot of time in consulates, then?
 

well i decided that the east india club was foreign enough to count

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: German Perl Workshop

2001-01-08 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Matthew Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Grep:

right who put the Grep in? own up!

 is Edinburgh foreign? ;-)
 
 Well, when we declare the independence of the PRoWY, you'll be welcome up
 for some of our dirt cheap, CAMRA-approved ale. You could even nominate
 someone to be first against the wall. 
 
 All the *.pm groups up here have Marie-Celeste websites. Has there been a
 pogrom in the North?
 

is a pogrom something that brings grimness to a region?

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: one liner

2001-01-08 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Michael Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:25:54AM -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
  Michael Stevens writes:
   I'm sure there are reasonable number of online manuals we'd all like
   printed copies of.
  Yeah, but if O'Reilly were to print them, you'd complain that the
  book was nothing more than the online manual :-)
 
 Yes, but that's because you have such a good reputation for delivering
 *more* than the online manual!
 

yip they have the pretty cover animals as well ;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Book is out!

2001-01-07 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:27:46PM +, David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
  On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:16:27PM +, Dave Cross wrote:
  
   ... they've opened the Author Online forum for you all to
   embarass me with difficult questions.
  
  " Dave, is it true that as well as munging data, this book will teach me
how to munge perldoc into printed books? "
  
  DUCK COVER
 
 Laugh? I thought I'd never start...
 

sounds like its time to dust my DBI book off and warm up the old scanner ;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: copious free time

2001-01-06 Thread Greg McCarroll

* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:25:02PM +, Neil Ford wrote:
  
  I'd re-launch Surrey.pm and hold meetings in Guildford if I thought
  there'd be anyone there but me... :-(=
  
  Nat and I would probably come... but then I suspect the conversation 
  wouldn't stay on the subject of Perl for very long... advantage being 
  we could always hold them outdoors in the summer :-)
 
 You people talk about *perl*???  What kind of perl mongers group *are*
 you???
 

hey! at least we can arrange the meeting place/date in less than a thousand
posts ;-)

-greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



one liner

2001-01-06 Thread Greg McCarroll


Ok, we are not (void) but we are pretty close so here is a one liner that
hopefully will provote discussion 

the only thing that gives potential for the marketing of a language is the
projects that are achieved using it and java has a hell of a lot more cool 
projects than perl





































































































/me is thinking of a new london.pm project called ``ignore the perl 6 body
and parallel to it lets create our own perl propoganda/marketting/best 
practice/for the good fo the language movement''  

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: FOOD

2001-01-05 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Alex Page ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:55:09PM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
 
   I drink badly too.
 
  I'm sorry, but that parsing of Jonathan's comment indicates that he
  *needs* badly.  His drinking skills are indeterminate at this point.
 
 Erm, how does one need badly?
 
 "God, I need a cigarette."
 "Here you go, you can scab one of mine."
 "No thanks, I'm fine."
 
 Alex, stalking dha around the 'net

dha  : Say, whats up Doc?
alex : be verry verry quiet, i'm hunting adlers
dha  : Adlers you say, how can you spot them?
alex : well they know too much about monty python
dha  : you mean things like ``the how to recognise body parts'' sketch
   from series 2 took 18 takes, as palin and cleese couldn't stop
   laughing at each other
alex : yeah thats right, say ..


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: not-paranoia

2001-01-05 Thread Greg McCarroll



ill stick more details about this here

http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net/

including a method for generating a character

* Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 there has been some talk, of playing a one off (ish) rpg, the night is 
 probably next thursday night and the game is open to all london.pm'ers
 (even if they have been to less than 3 meetings this year ;-) )
 
 the game is likely to use the original traveller rules but be set
 in a cyberpunk/1984 world from my feevered mind, min. players is 3
 maximum players i 8, and the game will be held in sydenham
 
 alchohol will be kept to a minimal level ;-) (because i'm the BGMFH)
 
 if people could mail me offlist if they are interested, alternatively
 we can create yet another non-perl related thread here
 
 greg
 
 
 -- 
 Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Technical Meeting

2001-01-05 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 As always I'm looking for volunteers to speak at the meeting. If you've
 got anything really cool[1] to tell us about then please let me know.
 

i can do 20 minutes on SOAP (not 20 mins squeezed into 5) ;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Technical Meeting

2001-01-05 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 I want to see someone do a lightning talk on musical interpretations
 of common Compsci algorithms.
 

i could clean up Devel::MIDI if you really waned Piers

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



lack of sleep, insanity and you rotten mongers

2001-01-04 Thread Greg McCarroll


i was just reading comp.unix.programmer and saw GREP and thought who's
talking about me,

this is all your fault!

greg

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Books

2001-01-04 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Michael Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:59:05PM +, David Hodgkinson wrote:
   er, what's wrong with foyles if it's not a silly question?
  
  Insane filing system
  
  Legendarily unhelpful staff
  
  It smells funny
 
 I spent several minutes once trying to teach one of the staff in their
 computing section how to spell the word 'silicon'. So he could put it into
 their computer and find the book I wanted, for which I knew both title
 and author.
 

That was Sili of you 

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623

2001-01-03 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
  
  check beano's in croydon, they can be quite good - also skoob do some
  rare tapes (in sicillian ave, next to pc bookshop)
  
 
 Wow, Beano's still there ?  Its been there since I was a kid.  
 

good place as well, one of the many delights of Croydon

Did you know Terry and June was set in Croydon? see you don't have
to go to the comedy store for good comedy! nope croydon does just as
well - also i think davidson sometimes does his panto at the fairfield

i'd need to check, does anyone know? anyone? anyone? dean? ;-) [1]

Greg

[1] sorry dean, i couldnt resist

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623

2001-01-03 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Greg McCarroll wrote:
 
  next youll be saying top gun is considered bad
 
 Top Gun is a top film (no pun intended) and Quentin Tarantino is a
 jumped up little pissant wannabe with 'I wanna be a cool gang-sta but
 I'm actually a white geek with bad hair who can't act' issues.

i agree, its a class film, and i wasnt being sarcastic in any way at all

i was watching it with a dutch friend recently (4am) and we were really
really drunk, i mean like a whole different league on from the worst
london.pm meeting - do you remember the guys Gellyfish got slaughtered
at YAPC::Europe? well they looked sober to us, anyway the point is i
seem to remember calling his ex-girlfriend on his nokia communicator
in loud speaker mode and singing the song down it as loudly as possible

then doing the same 10 minutes later after he had tried to teach me
the words in dutch

then at the power guitar bit at the end singing that down the phone

it was about then his flatmate came through to complaign

 And all the quotes from his monologue[0] which claim that TG is actually
 one huge homoerotic fantasy are wrong which just goes to show how
 bullshit it all is.

unlike ``Top C*ck'' the 1992 american soft pr0n film, where young men
from around the world come together to compete at the Top Stud academy
training to be the finest studs in the world. Just before the completion
of their training my the hot blonde bombshell Nelly McMuffins they
are alerted of an arab warlords harem is on the radar and are flew out
to use their new knowledge.

- err actually i just made this up
- err, making that sort of thing up is probably worse that watching it

i'll get my coat ...

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: irc again

2001-01-03 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Michael Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:49:58AM +, Aaron Trevena wrote:
  erm.. whats the irc channel for london.pm again.
  I spose I'll have to download bitchx as well now.
 
 irc.rhizomatic.net #london.pm
 

london.rhizomatic.net

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



<    1   2   3   4   5   >