from:"JD"


I don't know any better way to describe the problem.

On the following web page: http://www.iherb.com/info/Contact

On the left side there is a place to Contact us via Live Chat but 
there is no button to click on. Below where the button should be, it 
says (Click to Chat)


--
 JD..

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Missing Chat Button..

I restarted in Safe Mode with all Add-ons disabled and I still don't get 
a button. 	


Philip TAYLOR wrote:

I see a button : it is above the words Click to chat.
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615
Firefox/13.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.10.1

Philip Taylor
JD wrote: I don't know any better way to describe the problem.
 
  On the following web page: http://www.iherb.com/info/Contact
 
  On the left side there is a place to Contact us via Live Chat but
  there is no button to click on. Below where the button should be, it
  says (Click to Chat)
 



--
 JD..


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Missing Chat Button..


Do you use any customized HOSTS file?

I do, and it appears to be blocking what the button is referring to:

https://server.iad.liveperson.net/hc/68957657/?cmd=filefile=visitorWantsToChatsite=68957657byhref=1imageUrl=https://www.iherb.com/i/info/logo'

In my HOSTS file:

127.0.0.1  server.iad.liveperson.net


Philip TAYLOR wrote:

I see a button : it is above the words Click to chat.
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615
Firefox/13.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.10.1

Philip Taylor
JD wrote: I don't know any better way to describe the problem.
 
  On the following web page: http://www.iherb.com/info/Contact
 
  On the left side there is a place to Contact us via Live Chat but
  there is no button to click on. Below where the button should be, it
  says (Click to Chat)
 






--
 JD..


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Missing Chat Button..


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:

I don't know any better way to describe the problem.

On the following web page: http://www.iherb.com/info/Contact

On the left side there is a place to Contact us via Live Chat but
there is no button to click on. Below where the button should be, it
says (Click to Chat)


WFM with no special actions on my part -- I get a rectangular button
with Live Chat in bold black on a white background in the top
two-thirds and online in bold white on a green background in the
bottom third.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615
Firefox/13.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.10.1



Did you see my second reply to Phillip?

It's my HOSTS file.

--
 JD..


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread JD


chicagofan wrote:

I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which
worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all
I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download
newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it got at times.

I just need to know how, and IF I can set this news server up with the
u/n and password to get connected? Please take pity on me, I'm dealing
with a new Win7 O/S and a new SM 2.7... and both have text and symbols
that are almost illegible for these old eyes. :)
bj




When you're in SeaMonkey mail, click on Edit, select Mail  Newsgroups 
Account Settings. On the left side of the window that opens, click on 
Add Account.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't print chart


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Hartmut Figge wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher:


SM 2.6.1, print preview of this page:

http://assets.bostatic.com/frontend/projects/interactive-jobs-chart/embed/


loses most of the content. Any ideas?


In File-Print-Options


No such thing. But I do have File-Page Setup: Print Background (colors
 images). No separate options for one or the other.


... check
[x] Print Background Colors
[x] Print Background Images

Test this by printing to a file. Unfortunately these settings will be
forgotten and this may be the reason, why the preview is incomplete.


When I enable the background colors and images, SM fills the printable
area of the page with the background color for this page, but since the
chart is only half as high as the page, I get this huge area of wasted
cyan ink. Still, I do get to see the chart, so it's a step in the right
direction.


Seems like a bug to me. You may check, if there is already one in
Bugzilla and file a new one, if not. :)

Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0a1)
Gecko/20120205 SeaMonkey/2.10a1-h


Thanks.



Did you try a screen capture? Hold down the Alt key and hit Print on 
your keyboard. Then paste the image into your favorite image editor.


I also tried using the Print Background Colors and Images I couldn't get 
the entire image. I'm printing to .pdf not to my printer.


I don't know why this is happening, I'm just trying to help you get a 
good copy of the chart.



--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't print chart


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:


Did you try a screen capture? Hold down the Alt key and hit Print on
your keyboard. Then paste the image into your favorite image editor.


See my original query upthread, where I wrote:


I can copy/paste a print screen into a graphics program, but why
should I have to?




I also tried using the Print Background Colors and Images I couldn't get
the entire image. I'm printing to .pdf not to my printer.


I get the same results whether I print to my HP LaserJet IIP, my Okidata
C5200n, or Adobe Acrobat X. In all cases, the bars disappear, making the
chart useless.


I don't know why this is happening, I'm just trying to help you get a
good copy of the chart.


Thanks for trying. If I thought it were something peculiar about this
page, I'd just use a screencap. But I've had issues with SM printing
many times over the years (and with the Mozilla suite before it), and
this is part of the pattern.



My bad missing your screencap comment.

I usually print to .pdf and if that doesn't work then screencap to 
Photoshop 10 and print to .pdf. I don't print much to paper.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't print chart


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:


Did you try a screen capture? Hold down the Alt key and hit Print on
your keyboard. Then paste the image into your favorite image editor.


See my original query upthread, where I wrote:


I can copy/paste a print screen into a graphics program, but why
should I have to?




I also tried using the Print Background Colors and Images I couldn't
get
the entire image. I'm printing to .pdf not to my printer.


I get the same results whether I print to my HP LaserJet IIP, my Okidata
C5200n, or Adobe Acrobat X. In all cases, the bars disappear, making the
chart useless.


I don't know why this is happening, I'm just trying to help you get a
good copy of the chart.


Thanks for trying. If I thought it were something peculiar about this
page, I'd just use a screencap. But I've had issues with SM printing
many times over the years (and with the Mozilla suite before it), and
this is part of the pattern.



My bad missing your screencap comment.

I usually print to .pdf and if that doesn't work then screencap to
Photoshop 10 and print to .pdf. I don't print much to paper.


For most purposes, me too. But when you're trying to persuade voters,
it's more effective to put a color graphic in their hands than to tell
them to visit a website.



Screencap, paste to graphics program, crop, print from graphics program. 
I tried that, can't maintain the little rounded corners but all the 
information is there and print preview looks good. Too much blue for me 
to print but I think you'll have your color graphic.


I can e-mail you a copy. 3421 KB .jpg.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't print chart


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:


Did you try a screen capture? Hold down the Alt key and hit Print on
your keyboard. Then paste the image into your favorite image editor.


See my original query upthread, where I wrote:


I can copy/paste a print screen into a graphics program, but why
should I have to?




I also tried using the Print Background Colors and Images I couldn't
get
the entire image. I'm printing to .pdf not to my printer.


I get the same results whether I print to my HP LaserJet IIP, my Okidata
C5200n, or Adobe Acrobat X. In all cases, the bars disappear, making the
chart useless.


I don't know why this is happening, I'm just trying to help you get a
good copy of the chart.


Thanks for trying. If I thought it were something peculiar about this
page, I'd just use a screencap. But I've had issues with SM printing
many times over the years (and with the Mozilla suite before it), and
this is part of the pattern.



My bad missing your screencap comment.

I usually print to .pdf and if that doesn't work then screencap to
Photoshop 10 and print to .pdf. I don't print much to paper.


For most purposes, me too. But when you're trying to persuade voters,
it's more effective to put a color graphic in their hands than to tell
them to visit a website.



Small typo on the size. 343KB.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Exporting from SeaMonkey to be importing into my laptop...

2012-01-07 Thread JD


John Cunniff wrote:

Hello, Everybody,

I got a new laptop almost two weeks ago. I got excited about it. Before
I downloads SeaMonkey from the SeaMonkey-projects site, I went to my
Desktop and I found that I CAN import. But, I am looking for Export. I
want to export my stuff from my Desktop into my laptop to be imported.

How can I export everything, including mail folders, messages, settings
and et'al?

Thank you very much.

Johnny :)


I recently did the same thing with my new laptop. Install SM on the 
laptop, make sure the laptop and desktop are the same version of SM. 
Copy your entire profile from the desktop to the laptop. I used a 8 mb 
usb flash drive to move the profile.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Exporting from SeaMonkey to be importing into my laptop...

2012-01-07 Thread JD


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:


I recently did the same thing with my new laptop. Install SM on the
laptop, make sure the laptop and desktop are the same version of SM.
Copy your entire profile from the desktop to the laptop. I used a 8 mb
usb flash drive to move the profile.


Presumably you mean 8 GB. An 8 MB drive wouldn't begin to hold one of my
folders, much less my whole profile.



Thanks Paul for catching my little typo. I used an 8 GB USB flash drive.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: re-installing seamonkey

2011-11-19 Thread JD


LMH wrote:

Mike C wrote:

LMH wrote:

I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I
have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I
need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored
on another drive from the seamonkey install folder).

Is there a tutorial on how to do this without needing to re-import
everything, which is a pain.

LMH


Your existing profiles may contain something you don't want.
Copying them and then putting them into a new installation may just
transfer the problem. (What IS the problem?)

You should be able to reinstall a new SM right over the old one.

BUTI would create a new profile first and see if all is Ok there.

Mozbackup is a GREAT program. I've been using is for about 8 years!
It will back up your profile files instead of you doing it manually.
It will then restore the files to the new installation.

BUT... You need to explain what you mean by security breach?
Does someone know your passwords?
Do you have malware or a virus?
Is it only SM that's affected?


One of the reasons I use seamonkey is that it allows me to keep my
profiles in any location I designate. I have my profiles in a location
outside the seamonkey install directory, and off of the C: drive. These
folders are backed up every night along with all of my other data (using
rsync). If I restore my OS from an image, or something like that, my
email and browser are usually not affected. The same goes for a full
re-install of windows.

I haven't used mozbackup because I try to avoid relying on additional
applications. My experience has been that simple file to file backups
are the most dependable. All that said, using mozbackup in the manner
suggested would not compromise the redundancy already in place. Worst
case, I can always re-import my profiles, so I don't mind trying other
solutions. I wish that seamonkey had a simpler import tool, like point
to a folder and say import this one, instead of running from the
command line and all that.

I have a credit card that I use for online purchases only. That card
recently had a string of fraudulent charges run up on it, all of which
were online purchases from sites in Europe. My bank caught the charges
and flagged them as suspicious, so they never got past the pending
state. The charges have been canceled, along with the card. I am going
through some due diligence to make sure my system here hasn't been
compromised. Since these were online purchases, who ever used the card
would have needed to know the card number, name as printed on the card,
expiration date, card security number, and the entire correct billing
address. The two easiest places to acquire this data are from one of the
emerchants I made purchases from, or from my browser. There are very few
emerchants I do business with, and most of them are very reputable
(newegg, amazon, etc), but I still think an emerchant is the most likely
source. Still, I think it makes sense to look at my browser.

It would be nice if there was a way to scan all of the browser
components and do an MD5SUM to confirm that all of the .exe, .dat, and
.dll files are unmodified. I'm not sure where to look in the profile
folders to see if anything is amiss.

LMH


What programs do you have to scan for spyware? That's a pretty good way 
to take a look at the security of your browser.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey Freeze with Acrobat

2011-11-11 Thread JD


Carl Gehr wrote:

On 11/03/11 01:10 pm, Michael Gordon wrote:

hawker wrote:

I have read many threads about Seamonkey Freezing.
For me the only place I have seen this is since I moved from Acrobat
Reader 9 to Acrobat 10. I always saw it as an Acrobat problem and
thought the Acrobat Plugin was crashing Seamonkey when I print or save
files from the plug in.

I now realize Seamonkey did not crash, just locked up for 30 seconds to
a couple of minutes. So now I am wondering if this is part of the lock
up issues others are talking about? Do others see this Acrobat issue?
And is there any known fix? I don't know is this is Acrobat or
Seamonkey.

I live off of Acrobat and so this bug is really annoying.

While I am at it (I know this is not a Seamonkey question) I also notice
that the Acrobat plug in has two UIs. One is stripped down and clean
the other is more traditional and full featured. I don't like the clean
one (the one that normally comes up) but the full featured one only
sometimes comes up. Any idea how to force it one way or the other?

Hawker



Hawker,

Try this suggestion to eliminate the source of your problem.

Using SM download the pdf file to your desktop.
Close SM and double click the pdf file to open the file with the Adobe
Reader X.
With Adobe Reader rendering the file print the file.

Check the timing of the download in SM.
Check the time it takes for Adobe Reader X to render the file.
Check the time it takes to print the file.

Compare the timing using SM plugin to perform the similar tasks.

If SM takes a long time to download the file check the file size of the
downloaded file, it may be several Mb in size.

Making comparisons between the two operations may help you to determine
the cause of your pdf problems.


To respond to both this and the original post:
1) My SM does crash. About 90% of the time I click on a PDF link.
Sometimes, it is when I am not even expecting a PDF, but get the crash.
2) Since I cannot even get to the link for the PDF, downloading is not
an option.
3) Often, the PDF is not exposed [see unexpected PDF above] but SM
crashes when the hidden reference to the PDF is found.

This problem did not exist prior to SM 2.3 [which replaced 1.1.18 on my
system]




Are you using the Reader or the full blown version of Acrobat? What Version?

Whichever program you are using, click on Edit, Preferences, Internet. 
Under Web Browser Options, remove any check marks. Does this eliminate 
your problem?


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Crashes When Printing

2011-11-02 Thread JD


Sandy Pamin wrote:

JD wrote:

Sandy Pamin wrote:

Seamonkey 2.0.14 has been crashing a lot lately when trying to print. I
get the Mozilla Crash Reporter. I happens with all 4 of my PC's, both
Win XP and Win 7. Pages print fine with IE. Any ideas?


about:crashes

Copy and paste one report in your reply so somebody can take a look at
what it says.

What kind of printer(s) and your printer(s) set-up?



Printer is Canon MX870, using a wireless network.


ID: d07f1d26-9787-4ff2-9637-a2d9f201
Signature: F_1359172165

* Details
* Modules
* Raw Dump
* Extensions
* Comments
* Correlations

Signature F_1359172165
UUID d07f1d26-9787-4ff2-9637-a2d9f201
Date Processed 2011-11-01 19:12:51.318680
Uptime 2455
Last Crash 41.0 minutes before submission
Install Age 6.1 weeks since version was first installed.
Install Time 2011-09-20 17:24:52
Product SeaMonkey
Version 2.0.14
Build ID 20110420224920
Release Channel unknown
OS Windows NT
OS Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3
CPU x86
CPU Info GenuineIntel family 15 model 4 stepping 1
Crash Reason EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_READ
Crash Address 0x0
User Comments
Processor Notes
EMCheckCompatibility False
Winsock LSP
Adapter Vendor ID
Adapter Device ID
Bugzilla - Report this Crash
Crashing Thread
Frame Module Signature [Expand] Source
0 NPSWF32.dll F_1359172165
F_1929819672___:4795

1 NPSWF32.dll NPP_Print
F271887804___:1760

2 seamonkey.exe nsNPAPIPluginInstance::Print
modules/plugin/base/src/nsNPAPIPluginInstance.cpp:1165
3 seamonkey.exe nsObjectFrame::PrintPlugin
layout/generic/nsObjectFrame.cpp:1310
4 seamonkey.exe nsObjectFrame::PaintPrintPlugin
layout/generic/nsObjectFrame.cpp:1117
5 seamonkey.exe nsDisplayGeneric::Paint layout/base/nsDisplayList.h:875
6 seamonkey.exe nsDisplayList::Paint layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:313
7 seamonkey.exe nsLayoutUtils::PaintFrame
layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp:1114
8 seamonkey.exe nsPageFrame::PaintPageContent
layout/generic/nsPageFrame.cpp:582
9 seamonkey.exe PaintPageContent layout/generic/nsPageFrame.cpp:405
10 seamonkey.exe nsDisplayGeneric::Paint layout/base/nsDisplayList.h:875
11 seamonkey.exe nsDisplayList::Paint layout/base/nsDisplayList.cpp:313
12 seamonkey.exe nsLayoutUtils::PaintFrame
layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp:1114
13 seamonkey.exe nsSimplePageSequenceFrame::PrintNextPage
layout/generic/nsSimplePageSequence.cpp:648
14 seamonkey.exe nsPrintEngine::PrintPage
layout/printing/nsPrintEngine.cpp:2431
15 seamonkey.exe nsPagePrintTimer::Notify
layout/printing/nsPagePrintTimer.cpp:90
16 xpcom_core.dll nsTimerImpl::Fire xpcom/threads/nsTimerImpl.cpp:423
17 xpcom_core.dll nsTimerEvent::Run xpcom/threads/nsTimerImpl.cpp:512
18 xpcom_core.dll nsThread::ProcessNextEvent xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp:521
19 xpcom_core.dll NS_ProcessNextEvent_P
objdir/mozilla/xpcom/build/nsThreadUtils.cpp:247
20 seamonkey.exe nsBaseAppShell::Run
widget/src/xpwidgets/nsBaseAppShell.cpp:170
21 seamonkey.exe nsAppStartup::Run
toolkit/components/startup/src/nsAppStartup.cpp:193
22 seamonkey.exe XRE_main toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:3321
23 seamonkey.exe NS_internal_main suite/app/nsSuiteApp.cpp:103
24 seamonkey.exe wmain toolkit/xre/nsWindowsWMain.cpp:110
25 seamonkey.exe __tmainCRTStartup
objdir/mozilla/memory/jemalloc/src/crtexe.c:591
26 kernel32.dll BaseProcessStart


I see this:

Crash ReasonEXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_READ

I can't find an explanation as to what it means.

Any reason you've stuck with SM 2.0.14? The latest version is 2.4.1.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Crashes When Printing

2011-11-01 Thread JD


Sandy Pamin wrote:

Seamonkey 2.0.14 has been crashing a lot lately when trying to print. I
get the Mozilla Crash Reporter. I happens with all 4 of my PC's, both
Win XP and Win 7. Pages print fine with IE. Any ideas?


about:crashes

Copy and paste one report in your reply so somebody can take a look at 
what it says.


What kind of printer(s) and your printer(s) set-up?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What can I expect with upgrade to Version 2.3.3

2011-10-05 Thread JD


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:


You replied to my reply to another person. You replied to my reply
to Walter.

If you don't know what upgrade to upgrade gave you problems, then
it's hard to say what your next upgrade to upgrade will do.

SeaMonkey is not Netscape.

Click on Help, About SM. What is your current version? If your
current version is 2.0.14, then the upgrade so 2.4.1 should be OK.

If you have any problems with that upgrade, then post back to this
newsgroup and somebody will try to help.


Note: For the vast majority of users who have only one computer, this
last bit of advice is not very helpful. It's like saying if your
telephone isn't working, give us a call. Of course, most people have
friends with working phones, but still, I hope you can see the irony.

In the best of all possible worlds, we'd have a 24-hour toll-free help
line. In the real world, troubleshooting is somewhat more difficult, and
it's reasonable for someone who's just been burned to be cautious. This
is why I begin by synching my desktop installation with my laptop, and
upgrade the laptop only. If that proves troublesome, I still have a
working desktop to complain from. If I'm satisfied that it works fine,
only then do I take a chance and upgrade the desktop, knowing that I
have a working laptop as a fallback.

I have no other software whose upgrades I distrust so much; in 25 years
of running PCs I've never had any other application lose major
categories of data or become completely inoperable due to an upgrade. If
it were some minor applet like Flash I'd blow it off, but SeaMonkey is
absolutely central and essential to what I do in both business and
personal life. Without it, I'd be out of business in a heartbeat.



Are you offering to help Tony and Walter?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Anyone ever get a 404 on Cnet downloads?

chicagofan wrote:

JD wrote:

chicagofan wrote:

http://download.cnet.com/windows/?tag=contentMain%3bcontentBody

I've tried several times to download the Avast free version of their
anti-virus software through their site and got a 404. When I noticed it
was going to the Cnet site, I went directly to the Cnet site and tried
again several times... and keep getting a We're sorry the page you
requested cannot be found from the site.

I've never had this happen before on their downloads. Has anyone here?
bj

When I start here: http://www.avast.com/en-us/index
and click on the Download learn more button, it goes to:
http://www.avast.com/en-us/free-antivirus-download
and when I click on the Download button it goes to:
http://www.avast.com/en-us/download-thank-you.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Ffiles.avast.com%2Fiavs5x%2Fsetup_av_free.exeproduct=FApage=en-us/free-antivirus-downloadlocale=en-usavast=0

and a window pops up for me to click on to download the setup file.
setup_av_free.exe
No Cnet.
The exe file is coming from:
http://files.avast.com/iavs5x/setup_av_free.exe

Thanks, JD.

I don't know why Avast sent me to Cnet that morning, especially since
the Cnet download site wasn't working. However, later that day, the Cnet
site was fixed and I was able to download from there.
bj

You're welcome, bj.

No telling what happened. Good to hear you got your download!

--
JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What can I expect with upgrade to Version 2.3.3


Tony Higgins wrote:

I'm currently using SeaMonkey 2.0.14. What can I expect with upgrading
to Version 2.3.3? I get constant reminders to upgrade.

When I upgraded to the current version my profiles were copied to
another location which I had difficulty locating and then couldn't get
to work and had to re-establish all of my 5 email accounts using the old
location. It seems to me I also had trouble with my bookmarks.

Will this happen again? Is there an upgrade guide with step-by-step
instructions?

Thanks,

Tony Higgins


What version of SM were you using when you upgraded to your current 
version, 2.0.14?


The newest version of SM is 2.4.1. I don't recall a version 2.3.3. But I 
may have missed that update.  8-)


What Operating System are you using? Windows XP, 7?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What can I expect with upgrade to Version 2.3.3


Walter wrote:

Tony Higgins wrote:

I'm currently using SeaMonkey 2.0.14. What can I expect with upgrading
to Version 2.3.3? I get constant reminders to upgrade.

When I upgraded to the current version my profiles were copied to
another location which I had difficulty locating and then couldn't get
to work and had to re-establish all of my 5 email accounts using the old
location. It seems to me I also had trouble with my bookmarks.

Will this happen again? Is there an upgrade guide with step-by-step
instructions?

Thanks,

Tony Higgins


Me, too, Tony. I need instructions by the number with somebody holding
my hand all the way. Here's hoping.

Walter.



Feel free to read along. Did somebody supply you with instructions by 
the number and hold your hand when you started using SM?


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What can I expect with upgrade to Version 2.3.3


Tony Higgins wrote:

JD wrote:

Walter wrote:

Tony Higgins wrote:

I'm currently using SeaMonkey 2.0.14. What can I expect with upgrading
to Version 2.3.3? I get constant reminders to upgrade.

When I upgraded to the current version my profiles were copied to
another location which I had difficulty locating and then couldn't get
to work and had to re-establish all of my 5 email accounts using the
old
location. It seems to me I also had trouble with my bookmarks.

Will this happen again? Is there an upgrade guide with step-by-step
instructions?

Thanks,

Tony Higgins


Me, too, Tony. I need instructions by the number with somebody holding
my hand all the way. Here's hoping.

Walter.



Feel free to read along. Did somebody supply you with instructions by
the number and hold your hand when you started using SM?


If all you have to offer is ridicule and sarcasm then don't bother
replying. I don't know what version I'm being prompted to upgrade to.
All I know is that it is annoying and I still remember the fiasco when I
upgraded from the previous version of Sea Monkey. I still don't know why
it copied my profiles and email files to another location and then
wouldn't let me designate that location. I'm using Windows XP Media
Center SP3. I also have Windows 7 Pro on another drive that I would like
to install Sea Monkey on and have it work with my email files when I
boot to it. But for now, I just want to know what's in store doing this
upgrade if it is going to be anything like last time. If it is then I'm
not so eager to upgrade. I've upgraded through several versions of
Netscape and never had that experience before the last upgrade.

Tony


You replied to my reply to another person. You replied to my reply to 
Walter.


If you don't know what upgrade to upgrade gave you problems, then it's 
hard to say what your next upgrade to upgrade will do.


SeaMonkey is not Netscape.

Click on Help, About SM. What is your current version? If your current 
version is 2.0.14, then the upgrade so 2.4.1 should be OK.


If you have any problems with that upgrade, then post back to this 
newsgroup and somebody will try to help.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Anyone ever get a 404 on Cnet downloads?

2011-10-03 Thread JD


chicagofan wrote:

http://download.cnet.com/windows/?tag=contentMain%3bcontentBody

I've tried several times to download the Avast free version of their
anti-virus software through their site and got a 404. When I noticed it
was going to the Cnet site, I went directly to the Cnet site and tried
again several times... and keep getting a We're sorry the page you
requested cannot be found from the site.

I've never had this happen before on their downloads. Has anyone here?
bj



When I start here: http://www.avast.com/en-us/index
and click on the Download  learn more button, it goes to:
http://www.avast.com/en-us/free-antivirus-download
and when I click on the Download button it goes to:
http://www.avast.com/en-us/download-thank-you.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Ffiles.avast.com%2Fiavs5x%2Fsetup_av_free.exeproduct=FApage=en-us/free-antivirus-downloadlocale=en-usavast=0
and a window pops up for me to click on to download the setup file.
setup_av_free.exe
No Cnet.
The exe file is coming from:
http://files.avast.com/iavs5x/setup_av_free.exe

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Still getting pop-ups

2011-10-02 Thread JD


Tom S. wrote:

WLS wrote:

Tom S. wrote:

Hello all,

I have SM 2.4.1 running on Win XP SP3.

Here's something that's bugged me for a long
while. I thought eventually someone else
would bring it up and soon after, it would be
fixed. Oh well.

Why is it SM no longer stops pop-ups?

When a page loads that has a pop-up, I have
assigned a pop sound and the highlighted
exclamation point shows on the bottom
toolbar. But then, if I should click anywhere
on the page, the pop-up will open into a new
tab, instead of remaining suppressed. This
happens on almost all websites that use
pop-ups. (Oftentimes, they will use Flash for
these pop-ups, but the Flashblock extension
disables it, so it only shows the F
button.)

Is there anything I can change to prevent
the pop-ups from happening?

TIA.




You do not state whether you have Block
unrequested popup windows checked under your
Privacy and Security preferences.

Are the offending popups Ads?

I don't have Flashblock installed, but do have
AdBlock Plus installed and never have a
problem with unrequested popups.



I double checked the preference setting, and it is
checked. However, I see in the disclaimer: Even
if blocked, websites may use other methods to show
popups. So, that may be what's happening.

I'm currently not using AdBlock Plus, which I
tried a long time ago, but didn't like the way it
worked back then.



Got any examples of pages that are giving you popups?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.4 Release -- New Features and Fixes

2011-09-27 Thread JD


Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.4: The new major
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now!
Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it
delivers the latest developments in web technologies such as HTML5,
hardware acceleration and improved JavaScript speed.

SeaMonkey 2.4 is available in 24 languages, for Windows, Mac OS X and
Linux.

Most notably, this release features for the first time:

Drastically improved memory use
Added a new rendering backend to speed up Canvas operations on Windows
systems
Bookmark and password changes now sync almost instantly when using Sync
Added support for text-overflow: ellipsis
Added support for the Web Timing specification
Fixed several stability issues.
Fixed several security issues.
Fixed several high visibility usability issues from SeaMonkey 2.3.

For a more complete list of major changes in SeaMonkey 2.4, see the
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.4 section of the Release Notes, which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and
screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org.

Full news article:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2011-09-27

Downloads for all available platforms and languages:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/

Release notes:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.4

System Requirements:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/system-requirements



Updated without any problems using Help, Check For Updates.

Thanks! Keep up the good work!

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Web Shortcuts and the SeaMonkey Icon

2011-09-18 Thread JD


David E. Ross wrote:

My wife an I both use Windows XP SP3.  We both have SeaMonkey 2.3.3
marked as our default browsers.

On my PC, Web shortcuts on my desktop and in folders have the blue
SeaMonkey icon.  On my wife's PC, the same shortcuts have the IE icon.
We both have SeaMonkey as our default browser.  I have repeatedly tried
to set the SeaMonkey icon for the shortcuts on my wife's PC, but that
does not stick more than 1-2 seconds.

Can anyone suggest how to make the SeaMonkey icon stick on my wife's PC
for Web shortcuts?



I have an Internet Explorer icon on my desktop. When I right mouse click 
on it and select properties I get Internet Properties and when I click 
on the Programs tab, there is a place at the very bottom of that window 
to click on: Internet Explorer should check to see whether it is the 
default browser.


Be sure IE is closed and then click on the above and restart IE.

Nothing else has worked for you. I don't know why this would but you 
never know. If it doesn't work, are you sure you just can't live with 
the IE icons?  8-)


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Clear Cache..

I have a button on my PrefBar toolbar that is titled, Clear Cache. Used 
to, it would clear the cache, now all it does is freeze SM 2.3.3. How do 
I clear the cache? XP SP3.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Sign Up Form Problem..


I'm trying to sign up for All Access at Rolling Stone magazine:

http://www.rollingstone.com/allaccess

I enter the information and it bounces me with the following error:

csrf token: CSRF attack detected

I set the page to Allow Cookies and I turned off my Ghostery web bug 
blocking and I don't use their Cookie Protection but I still can't register.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Clear Cache..


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/16/11 8:31 AM, JD wrote:

I have a button on my PrefBar toolbar that is titled, Clear Cache. Used
to, it would clear the cache, now all it does is freeze SM 2.3.3. How do
I clear the cache? XP SP3.



Edit the button.  The onClick tab should have
 prefbarClearAllCache()

I notice that clearing the cache actually takes much longer than it did
with SM 2.0.x.



It's already set that way. Maybe I was just impatient? I did clear the 
cache through Edit, Preferences, Advanced, Cache and it did not freeze SM.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Never Mind..Re: Sign Up Form Problem..


JD wrote:

I'm trying to sign up for All Access at Rolling Stone magazine:

http://www.rollingstone.com/allaccess

I enter the information and it bounces me with the following error:

csrf token: CSRF attack detected

I set the page to Allow Cookies and I turned off my Ghostery web bug
blocking and I don't use their Cookie Protection but I still can't
register.



Not sure what I did but I cleared the SM cache, deleted all the web page 
cookies and finally got it to work. Not sure if it was worth the effort.


It appears the CSRF attack was my multiple tries to get their crappy web 
page to accept my entries.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Will FireForm be updated for SM2.3?

2011-09-14 Thread JD


flyguy wrote:

On 9/13/2011 7:59 PM, JD wrote:

flyguy wrote:

On 9/11/2011 8:00 AM, WLS wrote:

flyguy wrote:

Are there plans to update FireForm for SM2.3? If not, what is the best
replacement(s) for it?


Ask the developer if he plans to update it. It appears the last update
was 2009-02.16.

http://fireform.free.fr/en/news.html


The developer said he wrote it only for FireFox and someone else must
have ported it to SM. He had no plans to do an update for SM 2.3.



What was the last version of SM it worked with? Have you taken a look at
the install.rdf file? Sometimes you can edit that file and make an
extension work. Or did you already delete it?


It's still on my machines, but SM Add-ons Manager labels it as fireform
is incompatible with SM 2.3.3. I looked at the file, but have no idea
what needs to be modified.



Look for something like this:

!-- Mozilla SeaMonkey --
em:targetApplication
Description
em:id{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}/em:id
em:minVersion2.0b1/em:minVersion
em:maxVersion3.0/em:maxVersion

The maxVersion may not be 2.3.3 and that can be changed. I changed mine 
to 3.0.


Since you haven't done this before, you might want to make a backup copy 
of the install.rdf file before you make changes to it.


You might want to look at the Compatibility Reporter Add-On:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/?src=api 



--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.3.3

2011-09-13 Thread JD


mpdooley wrote:

On Sep 13, 2:46 pm, Ken Rudolphken...@gmail.com  wrote:

I resisted upgrading from 2.0.14 for all this time because of all the
controversy on this group.  However today after daily reminders to
upgrade stared me in the face for the umpteenth time, I just bit the
bullet and clicked on yes.  The automated upgrading took all of 3
minutes to download and install, and went flawlessly.  I can't find a
single problem yet; and even some sites which didn't accept SM before
(due to non-supported browser), now do accept it.  I suppose that is
because Firefox is now ID'ed instead of SeaMonkey?  That's certainly OK
by me!

So, thanks, developers.  I can now feel ever so much safer again without
guilt.

--
Ken Rudolph


My situation was similar to yours - elected to update from 2.0x
(2.0.0.14) to 2.3.3 after continuing reminders but would not be able
to suggest update was flawless.  Clearly we are dealing with a
different format for Bookmarks now but in my update post-install I
note that of my add-ons - only 10 of 20 installed extensions were
able to work in 2.3.3 and thus I now have 10 add-ons - that are
disabled in this version.  Had the option to uninstall 2.3.3 to either
revert to 2.0x or then move to 2.1 or 2.2 where more of these worked
or still-worked - likely that route would have been taken by me.

TWT but likely a required update just due to security flaws that
removes many of the browser tools users rely on is not going to be
widely appreciated.

Rather than disable add-ons and then install and then check for add-on
updates, a screen of add-ons and then advice which if any are
supported by the new version prior to installation authorization is
provided by user would ruffle less feathers.

My take


You got a couple of options to get your other 10 Add-Ons to work.

You can install the Add-on Compatibility Reporter Add-On:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/?src=api

If that doesn't work for you then you can edit the Install.rdf file for 
each Add-On. Or contact the author of the 10 Add-Ons.


If you're interested n getting your 10 Add-Ons to work, reply and tell 
us what Add-Ons aren't working.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Will FireForm be updated for SM2.3?

2011-09-13 Thread JD


flyguy wrote:

On 9/11/2011 8:00 AM, WLS wrote:

flyguy wrote:

Are there plans to update FireForm for SM2.3? If not, what is the best
replacement(s) for it?


Ask the developer if he plans to update it. It appears the last update
was 2009-02.16.

http://fireform.free.fr/en/news.html


The developer said he wrote it only for FireFox and someone else must
have ported it to SM. He had no plans to do an update for SM 2.3.



What was the last version of SM it worked with? Have you taken a look at 
the install.rdf file? Sometimes you can edit that file and make an 
extension work. Or did you already delete it?


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: How to save and fill in forms in Seamonkey 2.3.3?

2011-09-10 Thread JD


nikolam wrote:

How to save and fill in forms in Seamonkey 2.3.3?

I think Seamonkey previously had form maanger
that was managing form fillings and were filling forms automatically
when opened on page.

I see now form data is inside data manager
but I do not see option to save form data like before
and to insert form data like before.

I must say I did not esed filling forms in Seamonkey for a long time,
but now I have a page who has no standard password form to be managed by
password manager, but I would like to save it as form.
How do you do it in Seamonkey now?

N.


See if this Add-On will do what you want:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/remember-passwords/?src=api

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Using ONE profile on TWO machines

2011-08-30 Thread JD


Richard Owlett wrote:

I wish to use the _identical_ profile on *TWO* different WinXP Pro
machines. One machine is a desktop slowly recovering from a disk crash a
service department that decided to do some things their way rather than
as customer requested. The second machine is a backup laptop with its
own set of longevity issues.

I wish they profiles to reside on a USB so I can just plug it into the
appropriate machine. The critical thing is having all my mail and
newsgroups intact and up-to date. Leaving mail on my ISP's mail server
is not acceptable.

I'm using SeaMonkey 2.0.8. I know I'm revisions behind. I tried updating
and whatever the latest I had downloaded did not work well on my laptop
so I reverted.

What keyword should I search for and where?

TIA


I do something similar but with two desktop computers. One is my main 
computer and the other is a backup computer. What I do is copy the 
entire profile folder on my main computer onto a USB drive and then copy 
it to the backup computer. I haven't tried to move it back to the main 
computer.


C:\Documents and Settings\UserName\Application 
Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\ctsvjduh.default  Your profile will have 
a different name.


I realize you ask how to run the profile from the USB drive and I'm not 
sure how you would do that. If the USB drive ever fails or malfunctions, 
your Profile is toast.


In your case, when you're ready to use the other computer, copy the 
entire profile folder to the USB drive and then copy it to the other 
computer. When you're ready to move back to the other computer, copy it 
back to the USB drive and then onto the other computer.


There are a lot of variables here. Both my computers are Windows XP. The 
profiles are stored in the same place. I'm using SM 2.3.1.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Microsoft DRM

2011-08-21 Thread JD


Roger Fink wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

I really cannot stand using Microsoft's Windows Media Player.
However, Windows XP does not allow me to remove it.  So I disabled it
for SeaMonkey, using the Add-ons Manager.

Contained within Windows Media Player atC:\Program Files\Windows
Media Player\  are two DLL files: npwmsdrm.dll and npdrmv2.dll.
These both involve Microsoft's Digital Rights Management (DRM)
capabilities. Add-ons Manager shows these as enabled despite the fact
that Windows Media Player is disabled.

When I disable Windows Media Player, should not all parts of it also
become disabled?  Are the two DRM DLLs used at all when I listen to
streaming music through SeaMonkey via RealPlayer or Winamp?  Or are
they strictly for Windows Media Player?


Seems sort of obvious, but in case you haven't already done this, re-enable
WMP and then disable the two plugins (you can't remove them, at least on
WMP9). Now re-disable WMP and hope for the best.

Whether you can trade one for the other I don't know, but WMP9 is less nasty
than its successors, and there is a really excellent hack for ripping mp3s
at 48000 Hz that I'll be glad to post a link to.




I stopped at WMP10. Does your hack work with this version?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Screen showing add-ons

2011-08-19 Thread JD


Ken wrote:

JD wrote:

Ken wrote:

Only 'Home page' is ticked, JD.

- Ken (in Oz)
-
JD wrote:

Ken wrote:

Hi guys. Have SM 2.0.14 and Windows 7.

Does a screen listing add-ons, etc., really have to open every time I
turn on SM?

Thanks - Ken (in Oz)


Edit, Preferences, Browser. Display on  Browser Startup.

What are your settings there?





OK, this is going to get a little confusing. When somebody replies to
one of my questions, if they post their reply on the bottom of my
question then I post my reply below theirs.

My home page is actually a group of pages. Is it possible you've got
about:addons in a group of pages? If not, then tick Blank page, OK and
see if you still get the addons page when you start SM.



Hmm. Don't understand your question, JD, 'Is it possible you've got
  about:addons in a group of pages?'

For one, the phrase about:addons in your question displayed as a link.
On clicking on it, there was only a blank screen.

For another, I'm supposing that by about:addons you mean what my
browser displays (under Help at the top of page) as 'About Plugins'? I
can't see any reference there to groups of pages. (My Mozilla Default
Plug-in is shown as not enabled, btw.)

Also, I don't really understand your question generally.

But I went ahead and ticked Blank page, and then re-started the
computer. Sure enough, after opening SM, a blank page was displayed. But
so too was a separate screen listing my add-ons, etc. Which is what I
didn't want, hence my original question.

How can I suppress that separate screen opening each time I start SM?

(JD? Anyone?)

Thanks - Ken (in Oz)


If I type about:plugins in the address bar, I go to a different page 
than the one you get when you select Help, About Plugins. Which page are 
you seeing at start up?


If you had a group of bookmarks that open as you home page(s) then I 
thought it might be possible you had accidentally bookmarked about:plugins.


By changing it so you open with a blank page and you still get the 
add-ons screen, I'm not sure what the problem is. Sorry.


You might try switching profiles and see if the behavior continues with 
a new profile, but that's just a guess on my part.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Screen showing add-ons

2011-08-19 Thread JD


Ken wrote:

JD wrote:

Ken wrote:

Only 'Home page' is ticked, JD.

- Ken (in Oz)
-
JD wrote:

Ken wrote:

Hi guys. Have SM 2.0.14 and Windows 7.

Does a screen listing add-ons, etc., really have to open every time I
turn on SM?

Thanks - Ken (in Oz)


Edit, Preferences, Browser. Display on  Browser Startup.

What are your settings there?





OK, this is going to get a little confusing. When somebody replies to
one of my questions, if they post their reply on the bottom of my
question then I post my reply below theirs.

My home page is actually a group of pages. Is it possible you've got
about:addons in a group of pages? If not, then tick Blank page, OK and
see if you still get the addons page when you start SM.



Hmm. Don't understand your question, JD, 'Is it possible you've got
  about:addons in a group of pages?'

For one, the phrase about:addons in your question displayed as a link.
On clicking on it, there was only a blank screen.

For another, I'm supposing that by about:addons you mean what my
browser displays (under Help at the top of page) as 'About Plugins'? I
can't see any reference there to groups of pages. (My Mozilla Default
Plug-in is shown as not enabled, btw.)

Also, I don't really understand your question generally.

But I went ahead and ticked Blank page, and then re-started the
computer. Sure enough, after opening SM, a blank page was displayed. But
so too was a separate screen listing my add-ons, etc. Which is what I
didn't want, hence my original question.

How can I suppress that separate screen opening each time I start SM?

(JD? Anyone?)

Thanks - Ken (in Oz)


My mistake. Senior moment. about:addons in the address bar. 
about:plugins takes me to the same page as Help About Plugins.


Doesn't help with your problem but does clarify my last reply.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Microsoft DRM

2011-08-17 Thread JD


David E. Ross wrote:

I really cannot stand using Microsoft's Windows Media Player.  However,
Windows XP does not allow me to remove it.  So I disabled it for
SeaMonkey, using the Add-ons Manager.

Contained within Windows Media Player atC:\Program Files\Windows Media
Player\  are two DLL files: npwmsdrm.dll and npdrmv2.dll.  These both
involve Microsoft's Digital Rights Management (DRM) capabilities.
Add-ons Manager shows these as enabled despite the fact that Windows
Media Player is disabled.

When I disable Windows Media Player, should not all parts of it also
become disabled?  Are the two DRM DLLs used at all when I listen to
streaming music through SeaMonkey via RealPlayer or Winamp?  Or are they
strictly for Windows Media Player?



about:addons   Correct?

Click on Disable or Remove.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: New Seamonkey, new bug

2011-08-17 Thread JD


Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

JD wrote:

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:



Mike wrote:

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:


What I found instead was that the dialogue box was
not fully visible (see screenshot) --


You can grab the bottom border of the Window and expand it.
Though I agree the default view should be more intuitive.
Either make it obvious in some way how to see more, or
increase the default size by a bit.


Thank you, Mike. Yes, the window is resizeable, but I
would argue that rather than increase the default size
by a bit (which is bound to fail again at some point in
the future), all dialogue boxes should self-size before
presentation to the end user.

Philip Taylor


I re-sized mine to be the size of yours (not fully visible) and clicked
on OK. Went right back to the setting and the window was the correct
size. Not sure why yours doesn't work that way.


When you clicked OK, some bits somewhere in SM got set.
Then when you went again to the setting,
SM took a different code path .
(But who said his wouldn't work that way as well, if he done did that?)


What? Bits?

Mine opened fully visible. I re-sized to not fully visible. Next time I 
opened mine it was fully visible. The original poster says it doesn't 
work that way when it was re-sized.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Screen showing add-ons

2011-08-17 Thread JD


Ken wrote:

Hi guys. Have SM 2.0.14 and Windows 7.

Does a screen listing add-ons, etc., really have to open every time I
turn on SM?

Thanks - Ken (in Oz)


Edit, Preferences, Browser. Display on  Browser Startup.

What are your settings there?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.3

2011-08-16 Thread JD


A.Nonny Mouse wrote:

On 2011-08-08 10:17, sean nathan bean wrote:
Pat Connors sent me the following::

Okay, I just got home after a week away and see there is another new
version of SM. I am still on 2.0.14 and didn't update to 2.2 because of
all the complaints. Now we have 2.3 and more complaints. I really don't
know what to do. I like the version I am using. I am using Windows 7
which seems to complicate all new program updates.

Just wondering how others using Win 7 have managed with the new update.



my two cents:

SeaMonkey 2.1 and 2.2 have been virtually flawless...there may have been
a few niggling details which irked me personally... but none rose to the
level of making me decide to remain in the insecure 2.0.x series...


Sorry to disagree with you, but I found 2.1 and 2.2 to be virtually
useless because they were so badly flawed. Add the irreversible database
changes to this and I'm not even going to try 2.3.

I am very sad that SeaMonkey has chosen to follow on with the FireFox
release program (I understand that SM is inextricably tied to FF) rather
than just maintaining the 2.0 tree. I (and many others) believe the FF
6-week release cycle is an extremely bad idea and I have no intention of
going that route. Despite being a Netscape/Mozilla Suite/SeaMonkey user
for almost 20 years, I'm afraid I'm going to have to ditch Mozilla in
all its forms and go a different direction. Since I have a large
collection of tools I've developed for hacking various things about
Mozilla, I do not do this lightly. To put it bluntly, I am not
interested in a SeaMonkey that is nothing more than FireFox and
Thunderbird launched simultaneously -- if SM can't offer something other
than this, there's no reason for it to exist.

For me, it is far more important that I have something that is stable
and has a stable database format that I can develop my own tools for
than it is to support the latest eye-candy. The database format for
bookmarks and mail has been almost unchanged for that entire 20 years --
until now.

I haven't decided which browser+email I will be switching to since
considerable research will be required, but it has become sadly obvious
to me that it is necessary to change. Unless, that is, someone is
willing to fork SeaMonkey at the 2.0.14 level and maintain it strictly
with security bug fixes.



Sorry to see you go. Be sure to post back with what browser+email 
program you switched to. SM2.0.14 is the end of the line for the 2.0 
version. I'm not that crazy about certain aspects of SM2.2 but I've 
learned to make it work for me.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Tab Groups

2011-08-14 Thread JD


Philipp van Hüllen wrote:

So we should all celebrate an environment, where people can work with or
without tabs, windows, etc. pp. With bookmarks or address collection.
Anybody as (s)he likes.
Let's hope, most things stay optional in the future still. :-)


BR/Philipp


If not, somebody will probably come up with a tweak.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Download YouTube Videos as MP4 and FLV 1.2.3 Extension

This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More 
for this extension I end up here:


http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105

When I click on Install, I end up here:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/25105.user.js

What do I do with that?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Download YouTube Videos as MP4 and FLV 1.2.3 Extension


Philip Chee wrote:

On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0500, JD wrote:

This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More
for this extension I end up here:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105

When I click on Install, I end up here:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/25105.user.js

What do I do with that?


Greasemonkey has to be installed first.

Phil



Or can I just copy all the text and save the file as User.js? I don't 
have a User.js file.


I ask because the original version of this extension was an .xpi file, IIRC.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Download YouTube Videos as MP4 and FLV 1.2.3 Extension


Philip Chee wrote:

On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:07:27 -0500, JD wrote:

Philip Chee wrote:

On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0500, JD wrote:

This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More
for this extension I end up here:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105

When I click on Install, I end up here:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/25105.user.js

What do I do with that?


Greasemonkey has to be installed first.

Phil



Or can I just copy all the text and save the file as User.js? I don't
have a User.js file.

I ask because the original version of this extension was an .xpi file, IIRC.


Someone used a Greasemonkey compiler and converted the userscript into
an XPI.

Phil



Greasemonkey is not compatible with SM2.2. Any suggestions on how to 
update the extension or do you know of some other extension that allows 
one to save YouTube videos, which is what this extension used to do.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Never Mind..Re: Download YouTube Videos as MP4 and FLV 1.2.3 Extension


Philip Chee wrote:

On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:07:27 -0500, JD wrote:

Philip Chee wrote:

On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:53:18 -0500, JD wrote:

This used to work but YouTube changed something and when I click on More
for this extension I end up here:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25105

When I click on Install, I end up here:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/25105.user.js

What do I do with that?


Greasemonkey has to be installed first.

Phil



Or can I just copy all the text and save the file as User.js? I don't
have a User.js file.

I ask because the original version of this extension was an .xpi file, IIRC.


Someone used a Greasemonkey compiler and converted the userscript into
an XPI.

Phil



I got it installed by editing the install.rdf file after saving the .xpi 
file. Works again!


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Password Manager workaround

2011-07-30 Thread JD


Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:32:23 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:


With a bit of delay, I've uploaded initial version on the AMO site:

https://addons.mozilla.org/bg/firefox/addon/remember-passwords/


Blah. The more friendly URL should be:

https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/remember-passwords/



Thanks Stanimir! Works for me.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.2 e-mail client : where has right=click Paste as quotation gone ?

2011-07-25 Thread JD


Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:

Just attempted to reply to a friend's e-mail having first reformatted
the original text in an external editor to have line breaks at or
before column-72 (he is one of those annoying people who insist on
sending infinitely long lines), only to find that right-click Paste
as quotation has disappeared.

It is still possible from the Edit menu, but I am so used to
accessing it from a right-click that I feel distinctly lost without
it.

Philip Taylor


Here is my paste as quotation:


I tried what you said, by copying something from notepad with no line
length and this is how it looks using a right mouse click and
selecting paste as quotation.


I did have to select Edit, Rewrap.

So I guess it depends on what you're using as your external editor?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.2 e-mail client : where has right=click Paste as quotation gone ?

2011-07-25 Thread JD


Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:



JD wrote:


Here is my paste as quotation:


I tried what you said, by copying something from notepad with no
line length and this is how it looks using a right mouse click
and selecting paste as quotation.


A question :

Where did you find Paste as quotation : was it from Right-click at
intended point of insertion, or from Edit/Paste as quotation ?


I did have to select Edit, Rewrap.

So I guess it depends on what you're using as your external
editor?


I don't see how it can be. Surely all that is necessary is to have
something on the clipboard ? If I am offered paste, then that
confirms that there is something on the clipboard, so what reason
might there be that I was not also offered paste as quotation ?

Note : in the current e-mail dialogue, right-click/paste- as
quotation has re-appeared. Very odd indeed.

Philip Taylor



Strange that it disappeared. I'll try using a different text editor:


This was copied from WordPad and then right mouse click, Edit paste
as quotation. I'll go qo a little longer so Wordpad and wrap the
line.


It did not wrap the lines. I had to use Edit, Rewrap.

So, I'm not sure what the problem is. As you say, it's only pasting what 
is in the clipboard, which shouldn't hold any formatting.



Back to Notepad and I'll do the line lengths
to see if that makes a difference. That's the
only thing you were doing different, wrapping
your lines.


Maybe somebody else will come along with a solution.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Password Manager workaround

2011-07-23 Thread JD


Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:11:48 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:


Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames,
additionally:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);

function fillForms(doc) {
let forms = doc.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}
}

fillForms(content.document);

let frames = content.frames;
for (let i = 0; i  frames.length; i++) {
fillForms(frames[i].document);
}


Here's the code for a complimentary button which will allow saving the
passwords on pages which normally suppress it. I've generally taken the
code of the remember password [1] bookmarklet and enhanced it to
traverse into frames:

let ca, cea, cs;
ca = cea = cs = 0;

function rememberPasswords(document) {
let documentForms = document.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  documentForms.length; i++) {
let form = documentForms[i];
let formElements = form.elements;
if (form.hasAttribute(onsubmit)) {
form.onsubmit = ;
cs++;
}
if (form.attributes[autocomplete]) {
form.attributes[autocomplete].value = on;
ca++;
}
for (let j = 0; j  formElements.length; j++) {
let element = formElements[j];
if (element.attributes[autocomplete]) {
element.attributes[autocomplete].value = on;
cea++;
}
}
}
}

rememberPasswords(content.document);

let frames = content.frames;
for (let i = 0; i  frames.length; i++) {
rememberPasswords(frames[i].document);
}

function n(i, what) {
return i +   + what + ((i == 1) ?  : s)
}
alert(Removed autocomplete=off from  + n(ca, form)
+  and from  + n(cea, form element)
+ , and removed onsubmit from  + n(cs, form)
+ . After you type your password and submit the form,
+  the browser will offer to remember your password.);

Having this in a chrome button rather than as a bookmarklet should make
it work in more cases where the password forms are found in frames with
a different than the embedding document origin. This should generally
make the nsLoginManager.js hacks suggested elsewhere, unnecessary.

[1] https://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/forms.html#remember_password



Thanks. Can't wait to try it out.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Password Manager workaround


Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:


Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);
let forms = content.document.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}


Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames, additionally:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);

function fillForms(doc) {
let forms = doc.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}
}

fillForms(content.document);

let frames = content.frames;
for (let i = 0; i  frames.length; i++) {
fillForms(frames[i].document);
}



Do I used both the above or just the last one?

And I need the custom buttons extension?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Password Manager workaround


David E. Ross wrote:

On 7/17/11 2:12 PM, JD wrote:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:


Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);
let forms = content.document.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}


Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames, additionally:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);

function fillForms(doc) {
let forms = doc.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}
}

fillForms(content.document);

let frames = content.frames;
for (let i = 0; i  frames.length; i++) {
fillForms(frames[i].document);
}



Do I used both the above or just the last one?

And I need the custom buttons extension?



I just implemented Stanimir Stamenkov's script.  I used only the portion
that appeared in his second message and was not quoted.  Instead of
using the Custom Buttons extension (which I do not have installed), I
created a PrefBar button because I already have PrefBar installed.

The script works quite well.  When I encounter a split login -- user ID
on one page and password on a subsequent page -- Password Manager would
request my master password but would not insert my password into the
input area.  When I encounter that situation, I now merely select the
button from PrefBar's tool bar.  My password is then inserted.



How do I create a PrefBar button?

Here is the last script he posted:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
 .getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);

function fillForms(doc) {
  let forms = doc.forms;
  for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
  }
}

fillForms(content.document);

let frames = content.frames;
for (let i = 0; i  frames.length; i++) {
  fillForms(frames[i].document);
}

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Password Manager workaround


David E. Ross wrote:

On 7/17/11 2:12 PM, JD wrote:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:


Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);
let forms = content.document.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}


Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames, additionally:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);

function fillForms(doc) {
let forms = doc.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}
}

fillForms(content.document);

let frames = content.frames;
for (let i = 0; i  frames.length; i++) {
fillForms(frames[i].document);
}



Do I used both the above or just the last one?

And I need the custom buttons extension?



I just implemented Stanimir Stamenkov's script.  I used only the portion
that appeared in his second message and was not quoted.  Instead of
using the Custom Buttons extension (which I do not have installed), I
created a PrefBar button because I already have PrefBar installed.

The script works quite well.  When I encounter a split login -- user ID
on one page and password on a subsequent page -- Password Manager would
request my master password but would not insert my password into the
input area.  When I encounter that situation, I now merely select the
button from PrefBar's tool bar.  My password is then inserted.



Never Mind. I figured it out and the script does work!

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Password Manager workaround


David E. Ross wrote:

On 7/17/11 3:58 PM, JD wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 7/17/11 2:12 PM, JD wrote:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:


Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);
let forms = content.document.forms;
for (let i = 0; i   forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}


Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames, additionally:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);

function fillForms(doc) {
let forms = doc.forms;
for (let i = 0; i   forms.length; i++) {
lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}
}

fillForms(content.document);

let frames = content.frames;
for (let i = 0; i   frames.length; i++) {
fillForms(frames[i].document);
}



Do I used both the above or just the last one?

And I need the custom buttons extension?



I just implemented Stanimir Stamenkov's script.  I used only the portion
that appeared in his second message and was not quoted.  Instead of
using the Custom Buttons extension (which I do not have installed), I
created a PrefBar button because I already have PrefBar installed.

The script works quite well.  When I encounter a split login -- user ID
on one page and password on a subsequent page -- Password Manager would
request my master password but would not insert my password into the
input area.  When I encounter that situation, I now merely select the
button from PrefBar's tool bar.  My password is then inserted.



How do I create a PrefBar button?

Here is the last script he posted:

let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
   .getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);

function fillForms(doc) {
let forms = doc.forms;
for (let i = 0; i  forms.length; i++) {
  lm.fillForm(forms[i]);
}
}

fillForms(content.document);

let frames = content.frames;
for (let i = 0; i  frames.length; i++) {
fillForms(frames[i].document);
}



PrefBar 5.1.1 does work with SM 2.2 even though the Add-ons Manager says
it is not compatible.  If you do not yet have PrefBar installed, you
will need to open the downloaded XPI file with a ZIP application and
tweak the install.rdf file.  The necessary tweak has been discussed
repeatedly in this newsgroup.

Alternatively, you can wait for PrefBar 6.x.  I don't know what x will
be, but it should be available soon.

Once PrefBar is installed:

1.  Place your cursor over the PrefBar toolbar, right-click, and select
Customize PrefBar from the pull-down context menu.

2.  Place your cursor over the rightmost area under Enabled Items,
right-click, and select [New  Button] from the pull-down list.

3.  On the Common tab of the New Item:Button window, put a unique
identifier in the ID area and a short label in the Label area (I used
Pwd).

4.  Select the onClick tab of the New Item:Button window and paste
Stamenkov's script in the large input area.

5.  Select the OK button on the New Item:Button window.

6.  Make sure the new button (actually a checkbox) is in the Enabled
Items list in the position you prefer.  It can be dragged and dropped
into a new position.  Then select the OK button on the
Preferences:Preferances Toolbar window.



I have already edited the install.rdf file for PrefBar.

I guess you missed my second reply, I messed around and figured out how 
to add a button. PrefBar is a nice little extension. Add my own button, 
that's cool.


You explanation is really good, in case anybody else wants to add a 
button, especially Stanimir's password script. Works great!


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.2 Install offers options but doesn't deliver:

2011-07-16 Thread JD


MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 14/07/2011 19:09, azed13 told the world:

Normally, when I install new versions of Seamonkey I check custom so
that I can disable things like Chatzilla and a couple of other services
I never. I installed 2.2 on my laptop, selected Custom which only
offered installation directory choice and where I wanted shortcuts. I
tried it twice, no change. Consequently, I something called IRC Chat in
my quick launch bar (which I absolutely do not want) and 2.2 seems to be
loading pages much slower with too many time outs. How do I fix this or
is there another installer that will actually control what is installed
like earlier versions?


This was mentioned on the Release Notes. For technical reasons, the
installer no longer has that feature. I understand that there is the
intention of writing a new version of it sometime in the future. In the
meanwhile, the modules that were optional in the old installer can be
uninstalled from the Add-On Manager.

Chatzilla is the IRC Chat you mention. There is also the DOM inspector
and the Javascript Debugger. All of them can be removed from the Add-On
Manager.




Where in the Add-On Manager is there a place to uninstall the modular 
options like Chatzilla, Etc.?


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.2 Install offers options but doesn't deliver:

2011-07-16 Thread JD


Ray_Net wrote:

JD wrote:

MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 14/07/2011 19:09, azed13 told the world:

Normally, when I install new versions of Seamonkey I check custom so
that I can disable things like Chatzilla and a couple of other services
I never. I installed 2.2 on my laptop, selected Custom which only
offered installation directory choice and where I wanted shortcuts. I
tried it twice, no change. Consequently, I something called IRC Chat in
my quick launch bar (which I absolutely do not want) and 2.2 seems
to be
loading pages much slower with too many time outs. How do I fix this or
is there another installer that will actually control what is installed
like earlier versions?


This was mentioned on the Release Notes. For technical reasons, the
installer no longer has that feature. I understand that there is the
intention of writing a new version of it sometime in the future. In the
meanwhile, the modules that were optional in the old installer can be
uninstalled from the Add-On Manager.

Chatzilla is the IRC Chat you mention. There is also the DOM inspector
and the Javascript Debugger. All of them can be removed from the Add-On
Manager.




Where in the Add-On Manager is there a place to uninstall the modular
options like Chatzilla, Etc.?


about:addons then choice Extension
And for ChatZilla you have 3 choices: Options - Disable - Remove



Just didn't see it the first time I looked. Tools, Add-Ons Manager.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-16 Thread JD


Graham wrote:

I've used the Mozilla suite from the Netscape days on OS/2. Right up
to the end of the Seamonkey 1.x series, it always did what I needed, and
I am truly grateful for all the effort that's been put into Mozilla, and
Seamonkey in particular. I've tried Firefox, and used it extensively at
work, but for my own personal use, Seamonkey was just more usable.

Then came Seamonkey 2.0, with its badly broken form and password filling
and management. With some add-ons, a reasonable degree of functionality
was restored, but not all. This has led me to using LastPass, which has
had a side-effect - I'm no longer tied to a particular browser.

Plugins have always been somewhat problematic with Seamonkey, because as
we are all only too well aware, many developers won't test Firefox
plugins with Seamonkey, even if they'd most likely just work. However,
the important ones (for me) worked most of the time.

Then comes Seamonkey 2.1, with yet more user interface changes and some
loss of function, and the Firefox inspired rapid release cycle. Although
the Firefox team don't seem to see this as a problem, many users do, and
we've been treated to the sad sight of developers who would far rather
argue than listen. One or two have shown a stunning degree of arrogance
which I have found quite off-putting.

Just because Chrome can manage a rapid update cycle, with new versions,
doesn't mean the Mozilla programs can do it the same way. The way
plugins and extension work with Chrome releases is different to the way
Mozilla ones work. Unlike Mozilla plugins which need to specify which
versions and releases they work with, Chome ones merely need to check
for a minimum level of Chrome: if it works today, it will probably work
four versions from now. Not so in Mozilla's world.

So, I've switched to Chrome. I don't particularly like it, but I'm
liking Seamonkey less and less anyway. Chrome doesn't have all the
plugins I want, but it has most of them, and despite worries about
Google tracking every moment of your life, they do actually provide ways
to stop them doing a lot of it, and there's plugins to do some of the
rest. (There's also the small matter of not running into so many sites
which say I'm not using a supported browser - businesses have quite
rapidly adopted Chrome as a supported browser for customers, and the one
I work for supports it for internal use too.)

Once again, I thank the Mozilla and Seamonkey teams for all their
efforts: the web and all its browsers are much better for their efforts;
even IE has improved by leaps and bounds because of Firefox. I won't be
along for the ride, but I will keep an eye open, and may be back one day.

Graham.


I hear you. SM2.+ is different. I guess you never got a good look at the 
Data Manager or you probably would have said something about it. It's a 
little confusing to me. I bet I'll learn to deal with it.


I hear you. I had to lean to edit install.rdf files to get my extras to 
work. I've learned a little more about my userChrome.css file. My active 
tab is now azure. And I can make it any color I want.


I hear you. And I'm wondering why you just didn't go quietly? We're not 
going to stop the party just because one person is going home early. 
We're just getting started!  8-)


Take care..

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: tabs in SeaMonkey 2.2 browser poorly designed

2011-07-15 Thread JD


Jens Hatlak wrote:

Bill Spikowski wrote:

Jens Hatlak wrote:

I posted the exact version you need to install:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/colorfultabs/versions/#version-4.8.1.6.1



I just installed this on SM 2.2; the Add-Ons Manager says it's not
compatible, but the tabs sure are colorful now!

All I really want is to highlight the current tab with any color that's
different than the other tabs. Can this extension do that?


I don't think so. What you want is this:

1. Install Stylish 1.2 (needs compatibility override for SM 2.2) or do
the below in your userChrome.css
2. add this style:

.tabbrowser-tab[selected=true]  hbox {
background-color:#b7e490 !important;
}

The color is just an example (you can choose what you like), and you can
of course apply any CSS there, like color: for the foreground color etc.

HTH

Jens



That's what I was looking for. Thanks!

Now, how do I change the color to a light blue?

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: tabs in SeaMonkey 2.2 browser poorly designed

2011-07-15 Thread JD


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

JD wrote:


Jens Hatlak wrote:

.. userChrome.css
2. add this style:

.tabbrowser-tab[selected=true]  hbox {
background-color:#b7e490 !important;
}

The color is just an example (you can choose what you like),


Now, how do I change the color to a light blue?


Jens has told you the 'how' .. but you can select a color from this
comprehensive listing:

http://www.somacon.com/p142.php



Azure it is: #F0

Thanks Beau!

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: tabs in SeaMonkey 2.2 browser poorly designed

2011-07-15 Thread JD


Jens Hatlak wrote:

JD wrote:

Now, how do I change the color to a light blue?


Search Google for web color chooser, pick yours and copy the #ABCDEF
(RGB) value.

HTH

Jens



Beau provided a link that works for me. Azure it is: #F0


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Radio Station Online..


This used to work with SM 2.0+ but I'm having limited success with SM2.2.

http://www.kbat.com/

On the right side, last 10 played never shows up. It used to.

Also on the right side, up higher, Listen Live opens a new tab with the 
following message:


Please wait while loading video player.
If no content appears within 15sec, you may need to download or upgrade 
the free Adobe Flash Player.


If I use IE tab to change to IE, I get a player, with a Missing Plugin 
Alert but I used to be able to click on Use our Basic Player by Clicking 
Here and it would play. Now it does nothing.


If I click on Help, then it says:

You will need to either disable your pop-up blocker or add 
player.cumulusstreaming.com to the allow list in the configuration 
of your particular pop-up blocker.


I try that and I'm in the Data Manager which is very confusing as to 
what to add, etc.


Any ideas?


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Radio Station Online.. Update


JD wrote:

This used to work with SM 2.0+ but I'm having limited success with SM2.2.

http://www.kbat.com/

On the right side, last 10 played never shows up. It used to.

Also on the right side, up higher, Listen Live opens a new tab with the
following message:

Please wait while loading video player.
If no content appears within 15sec, you may need to download or upgrade
the free Adobe Flash Player.

If I use IE tab to change to IE, I get a player, with a Missing Plugin
Alert but I used to be able to click on Use our Basic Player by Clicking
Here and it would play. Now it does nothing.

If I click on Help, then it says:

You will need to either disable your pop-up blocker or add
player.cumulusstreaming.com to the allow list in the configuration
of your particular pop-up blocker.

I try that and I'm in the Data Manager which is very confusing as to
what to add, etc.

Any ideas?




I tried this in IE and it didn't work there either. I even installed 
their MS Silverlight player and it doesn't connect. It must the a 
problem with the web page?


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Radio Station Online..


David E. Ross wrote:

On 7/12/11 12:23 PM, JD wrote:

This used to work with SM 2.0+ but I'm having limited success with SM2.2.

http://www.kbat.com/

On the right side, last 10 played never shows up. It used to.

Also on the right side, up higher, Listen Live opens a new tab with the
following message:

Please wait while loading video player.
If no content appears within 15sec, you may need to download or upgrade
the free Adobe Flash Player.

If I use IE tab to change to IE, I get a player, with a Missing Plugin
Alert but I used to be able to click on Use our Basic Player by Clicking
Here and it would play. Now it does nothing.

If I click on Help, then it says:

You will need to either disable your pop-up blocker or add
player.cumulusstreaming.com to the allow list in the configuration
of your particular pop-up blocker.

I try that and I'm in the Data Manager which is very confusing as to
what to add, etc.

Any ideas?




It requires Micro$oft's Media Player, which I refuse to install.  Too
often, streaming broadcasts through Media Player require that I keep the
Web page for the broadcast up.  This means I cannot change profiles.  I
have the same problem with streaming broadcasts through Flash, but I do
have that installed.

I stick to streaming broadcasts through RealPlayer and WinAmp.  Although
launched through SeaMonkey, they operate independent of the browser.
Indeed, I can shut down SeaMonkey entirely without affecting the
broadcast reception.



I finally got it to work in IE tab after installing the MS Silverlight 
plugin. KBAT would not work but other stations did so I think the 
problem is with KBAT.


I use old versions of WMP and IE when I have to but I'm not updating 
either. Most of my music and videos are through Media Player Classic HC.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Radio Station Online..


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

JD wrote:


This used to work with SM 2.0+ but I'm having limited success with SM2.2.

http://www.kbat.com/

On the right side, last 10 played never shows up. It used to.
...



The most obvious question is whether your cookie policy has changed. I
would assume they store this info in a cookie, so if you reject cookies,
they won't remember what you've played.



I got it to work and it appears the problem is with KBAT. See my reply 
to David.



--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: why so bitchy???

2011-07-11 Thread JD


km wrote:

... i see numeroud(numerous) complaint abt sm and each ome(one)
can be answered the same YOU ARE GETTING WHAT YOU
PAID FOR!!! JUST KEEP IN MING(MIND) sm was free. it id(is)
wicked pissa for the price.


u go grl  8-)

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

2011-07-10 Thread JD


Jay Garcia wrote:

On 10.07.2011 11:10, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

  --- Original Message ---


Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/:

On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote:


Start here:
https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous
and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box.


FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I get
https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous as the correct page, not
an error page.


Did you try following the Register Now link?



Just did, got the error message. Guess we won't be taking the train!!! :-)



I use PrefBar and I have three UA strings that work with Register Now at 
this link: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous


SeaMonkey 2
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) 
Gecko/20080829 NOT Firefox/2.0.0.12 SeaMonkey/2


SeaMonkey 2 +
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) 
Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b2 NOT Firefox 4.0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.0.14


IE8 on Windows 7
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; 
SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media 
Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; FDM)


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: User Agent Switcher compatible with 2.2

2011-07-10 Thread JD


Danny Kile wrote:

I upgrade to SM 2.2 and now my User Agent Switcher is not compatible,
anyone know of any Add-On's that are compatible with SM 2.2?

Thank you,


If you didn't remove it, you should be able to edit the install.rdf file 
and then it will report as compatible.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: User Agent Switcher compatible with 2.2

2011-07-10 Thread JD


Danny Kile wrote:

Francesco Presel wrote:

Danny Kile ha scritto:

I upgrade to SM 2.2 and now my User Agent Switcher is not compatible,
anyone know of any Add-On's that are compatible with SM 2.2?

Thank you,


What do you mean by not compatible? Does it only say so, or does it
really not work: in the first case, you can try manually changing its
compatibility (see
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing_an_add-on_to_change_its_compatibility)
or using the addon compatibility reporter
(https://addons.mozilla.org/en/seamonkey/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/),

which disables max version checks.

If it still doesn't work, there's a (customizable, see support site)
User Agent switcher tool in PrefBar
(https://addons.mozilla.org/en/seamonkey/addon/prefbar/)



If I go to Add-On Manager it list User Agent Switcher is incompatible
with Seamonkey 2.2.

The
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/
link did the trick installed this addon and disabled compatible checking.


Thanks for letting us know what worked for you.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.2 Release


Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.2: The new major
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now!
Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it
delivers the latest developments in web technologies such as HTML5,
hardware acceleration and improved JavaScript speed.

SeaMonkey 2.2 is available in 21 languages, for Windows, Mac OS X and
Linux.

Most notably, this release features for the first time:

Added support for CSS animations.
Tuned HTTP idle connection logic for increased performance.
Improved canvas, JavaScript, memory, and networking performance.
Improved standards support for HTML5, XHR, MathML, SMIL, and canvas.
Improved spell checking for some locales.
WebGL content can no longer load cross-domain textures.
Background tabs have setTimeout and setInterval clamped to 1000ms to
improve performance.
Fixed several stability issues.
Fixed several security issues.
Fixed several high visibility usability issues from SeaMonkey 2.1.

For a more complete list of major changes in SeaMonkey 2.2, see the
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.2 section of the Release Notes, which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and
screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org.

Full news article:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2011-07-07

Downloads for all available platforms and languages:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/

Release notes:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.2

System Requirements:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.1/system-requirements [sic]



Installed over 2.1 without a problem. I've already edited my add-ons 
install.rdf files to reflect version 3.0.  8-)


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

DOM Inspector

Upgrading to SM2.2 has disabled DOM Inspector 2.0.10pre. I can't seem to 
find a way to get a later version and I can't find it's install.rdf 
file. Any suggestions?


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: DOM Inspector (Never Mind)


JD wrote:

Upgrading to SM2.2 has disabled DOM Inspector 2.0.10pre. I can't seem to
find a way to get a later version and I can't find it's install.rdf
file. Any suggestions?



I found the .xpi file for DOM Inspector here:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-Us/seamonkey/addon/dom-inspector-6622/

Had to edit the install.rdf file and then it installed in SM 2.2 without 
a problem and I have my DOM Inspector back.


I can't recall ever using the DOM Inspector so I guess my DOM hasn't 
ever needed to be inspected?


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Why do all my addons have to break when ever I update?


Bill Davidsen wrote:

Robert Kaiser wrote:

JeffM schrieb:

...then there is Google included an actual API for extensions
in their Chrome Browser.


There's an Add-On SDK for Mozilla software that does the same. Still,
add-ons built with that only or the Google Chrome API can do so much
less than full-blown add-ons for Mozilla products that I don't expect
all add-ons to switch to using it.


The thing is, in most cases the add-on didn't break, it just needs to
have install.rdf updated. And that is really hostile to users, when a
pop-up could ask if the user wanted to install and warned that it might
break things. That is so much safer than having users unpacking,
modifying, repacking, and then trying an add-on.

Follow this logic: not only are there more users who can figure out a
[TRY IT] button without messing up, but the number of people
distributing hacked versions of add-ons would drop to zero. Sooner or
later someone will figure out that offering an updated add-on is a
great way to slip in malware.


These are the prices you pay for being a pioneer:


Not just for being a pioneer, but also for allowing many more degrees of
freedom that others.


Could you at least hint WHY a working disable compatibility check in
button or about:config form is not available, while developers tell
people to hack the add-on which has higher risks. The add-on manager
whines that compatibility checking is disabled, but clearly it isn't. At
least a button would force the user to consider the issue before blindly
hacking install.rdf.



It's really not a difficult hack to change a install.rdf file. More of 
a minor edit. I'm talking about my old add-ons that were deemed 
incompatible with SM2.1. Hacking the install.rdf in a .xpi file is a 
little more difficult but still not that difficult.


I'm not taking sides and I'm not saying anything about what you're 
saying. I'm just saying what I'm saying. Enough said.


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: DOM Inspector


Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:05:52 -0500, /JD/:


Upgrading to SM2.2 has disabled DOM Inspector 2.0.10pre. I can't
seem to find a way to get a later version and I can't find it's
install.rdf file. Any suggestions?


Try creating a new profile, then copy the contents of
new_profile/extensions over to your main_profile/extensions.

If you continue having problems, try deleting the extensions.* files [1]
in your profile directory, once - they'll get regenerated after you
start SeaMonkey.

[1] http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_SeaMonkey#Files



Please see my Never Mind reply.  8-)


--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: DOM Inspector


WLS wrote:

JD wrote:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:05:52 -0500, /JD/:


Upgrading to SM2.2 has disabled DOM Inspector 2.0.10pre. I can't
seem to find a way to get a later version and I can't find it's
install.rdf file. Any suggestions?


Try creating a new profile, then copy the contents of
new_profile/extensions over to your main_profile/extensions.

If you continue having problems, try deleting the extensions.* files [1]
in your profile directory, once - they'll get regenerated after you
start SeaMonkey.

[1] http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_SeaMonkey#Files



Please see my Never Mind reply. 8-)




DOM Inspector is updated. Don't know why you folks can't be a little
more patient.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/dom-inspector-6622/


That's the version I edited. In the install.rdf file, it said:

em:maxVersion2.1/em:maxVersion  For SeaMonkey. I'm on 2.2.

I may have edited the above line because I thought it said something 
like 2.1bpre.


It now says 3.0. That's how I've changed all the install.rdf files for 
my add-ons.


So I'm not sure dom-inspector-6622 will install on SM2.2.

I do believe Patience is a virtue. It's jut a virtue I don't have much of.

--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: DOM Inspector