Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread NetVicious
sábado, 26 feb 2005 at 18:55, it seems you wrote:

 That would be fine with me.  Even just a checkbox in the prefs to
 enable/disable the button's fuctionality and include/remove it from the
 toolbar would be fine with me.  In fact, it's a very good idea to make
 it inactive completely unless someone wants to make it active.

What about a messagebox with a confirmation as TB does now when trying
to open an attachment?

-- 
  /\/ Using The Bat! 3.0.2.10 Professional
 /  \  / \  / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 1)
/\/ e t   \/ i c i o u s  Plugins: BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release and miniRelayPlug 
0.05.50
      Last 24 hour Spam% it's 53%
Moderator of Spanish TBUDL
Spanish Translation Coordinator of The Bat!







 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Richard Wakeford
I have changed a couple of icons in the new_icons.png file but they stay
as with the original colours in the original file. I can't understand
it. It's the only png file in my Alpha folder and my icons in TB!
version 3 are totally different so it can't be using those so where are
the icons stored if not in this file? I've rebooted the PC and still no
change.

-- 
Regards,
Richard

| The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha  SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| Opera 8.00 build 7401




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Leif,

  A reminder of what Leif Gregory on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 02:10:08 GMT +0100

LG Happy Tony? Now you drug me into this!

 I've bowed out of it as gracefully as I could now. No one came up with any
 new convincing reasons for html so it got boring.

 Anyway, I didn't have to drug you to get you to make a comment, your own
 conscience done that for me :)


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

2005-02-27 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Stefan Tanurkov,

Monday, February 21, 2005 
you let us know -at least in parts- :

 It's an Alpha, so please be aware of the numerous bugs and omissions -
   please feel free to mention them here or at the BT.

When TB is sent to tray and is running idle, rightclicking on it
selecting close will not close TB. Nothing happens. I have to maximize
it again and close it the regular way.


-- 
best sunday wishes
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:star:






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

2005-02-27 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Charlene,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

CF When TB is sent to tray and is running idle, rightclicking on it
CF selecting close will not close TB. Nothing happens. I have to maximize
CF it again and close it the regular way.

Can't confirm although there are times when it does/doesn't do something
for no apparent reason and then it works fine this morning. Earlier on I
tried to send a message direct but clicking on the send button in the
Message Edit box did nothing, I had to put it in the outbox before it
would send. This has not happened before or since with this Alpha.

-- 
Regards,
Richard

| The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha  SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| Opera 8.00 build 7401




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


BayesIt 0.7.8

2005-02-27 Thread Vadim Yavorsky
 , 

  :
[*] corrected autolearning when using on-fly encryption in The Bat!
[-] statistic wasn't included into transaction mechanism of
autolearning which might cause incrementing of data in the case of
interrupted autolearning).
  
  
  http://files.nobat.ru/plugins/55

  :-)
-- 
Best Regards,
Vadim Yavorsky

The Bat! 3.0.2.8
OS Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 (Service Pack 2)
AntiSpam Plugins BayesIt! 0.7.6




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 10:20:44, Richard Wakeford wrote:

 I have changed a couple of icons in the new_icons.png file but they stay
 as with the original colours in the original file. I can't understand
 it. It's the only png file in my Alpha folder and my icons in TB!
 version 3 are totally different so it can't be using those so where are
 the icons stored if not in this file? I've rebooted the PC and still no
 change.

Which program did you use to change the icons? You need an image editor that
supports PNG with alpha channels.

-- 
 Jernej Simoncic  http://deepthought.ena.si/ 

[The Bat! v3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha on Windows NT Clone 5.2.3790.]

Nothing can be done in one trip.
   -- Cook's Second Law of Travel



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Mic Cullen
At 11:03 [GMT-0500] on Friday February 25 (actual time - 12:03am on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:

 A 1600x1200 picture reduced to 320x240 for viewing in a newsletter
 will look worse than the same picture taken at 640x480. Why waste the
 resources for an inferior product?

If you have even a vague clue as to what you are doing, that statement is
utterly false.

-- 

cheers, mic

There are painters who transform the sun to a yellow spot, but there are 
others who with the help of their art and their intelligence, transform a 
yellow spot into the sun.
Pablo Picasso



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread MAU
Hello Greg,

 If development would not have ceased I would still be using VA today.

:-)

 Because of the VA situation I moved on to TB for email, and use Agent
 for newsgroups.

Why don't you use TB for newsgroups also? Works beautifully with MyGate.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Paul Van Noord
2/27/2005  6:19 AM

Hi Leif,

On 2/26/2005 Leif Gregory wrote:

LG Happy Tony? Now you drug me into this! :-)

Very well said!

-- 
Take Care,
Paul

The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4 



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Paul Van Noord
2/27/2005  6:29 AM

Hi Mic,

On 2/27/2005 Mic Cullen wrote:

MC If you have even a vague clue as to what you are doing, that statement is
MC utterly false.

My monitor only shows 96 dpi, what is yours?

-- 
Take Care,
Paul

The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4 



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jernej,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

JS Which program did you use to change the icons? You need an image editor that
JS supports PNG with alpha channels.

Paint Shop Pro version 9. So do I need to save the whole file as an
alpha channel? I just did the alterations straight into the png file as
it shows, didn't select anything.

-- 
Regards,
Richard

| The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha  SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| Opera 8.00 build 7401




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Allie
Hi Paul,
 On 27/2/2005 6:21 AM, you wrote:

 Very well said!

Yeah. A good technical argument rather than all the other
philosophical and hyped ones that I had seen until then.

OTOH, one wonders, why implement anything at all then if we look at it
in that depressingly unsurmountable all-or-none fashion. The original
request was about retrieving images on a per message basis with the
ability to configure such behaviour. Now it has gone into TB! being
able to render and display everything a browser can, now, and for the
future.

I certainly consider both different.

I don't care much for image retrieval personally. I'd sure wish IMAP
to work first before such things are implemented. If it is, and is
configurable, I'd be indifferent. I doubt it will be though. At least
not for the foreseeable future. Most clients with very good HTML mail
displaying capabilities either use the IE rendering engine or are part
of an established browser, i.e., Operamail or Mozilla/ThunderBird.

-- 
  _ _ _   __  __
 __ _| | (_)___  |  \/  |
/ _` | | | / -_) | |\/| |
\__,_|_|_|_\___|_|_|  |_|
  |___|
-=-=-
Some nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello NetVicious!

On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 2:55 AM, you wrote:

 That would be fine with me.  Even just a checkbox in the prefs to
 enable/disable the button's fuctionality and include/remove it from the
 toolbar would be fine with me.  In fact, it's a very good idea to make
 it inactive completely unless someone wants to make it active.

 What about a messagebox with a confirmation as TB does now when trying
 to open an attachment?

The quoted text to which you are replying was in reply to my comment
that I wished (felt I needed) to be able to have the functionality
completely disabled. If a warning box is all that I get, the situation
would be an unwieldy one for me.

And for those who have been most clear (at least two or three people
posting to this thread) that the current work-around to graphic image
display is too slow for them, the warning box would function as an
extra slow-down.

If, and when, this capability is implemented by the developers, I hope
it will be disabled by Default and the User will first have to enable
it before the capability (button or menu or shortcut or whatever)
becomes active.

This is so that I can protect myself from inadvertently putting a
graphics image into a message-text bodyin the View Folder window.

I am just one old-lady user. But I think perhaps there are others with
my needs using TB!, or out there as potential users, and it would be
so simple to respect this need of mine by having the capability OFF by
Default.

I have, in the past, actually been distracted and clicked Send, on the
warning box that comes before a message is Sent, without intending to.
At a computer screen, even the best of us make mistakes, I think. I'd
like for the individual user to be able to choose, in regard to this
particular functionality, the amount of risk for mistakes that the
user is comfortable with.

Note, however, that I do not object to others accepting more risk than
I do. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2







 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

2005-02-27 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Charlene,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:25:45 +0100GMT Charlene Ferrara wrote:

CF When TB is sent to tray and is running idle, rightclicking on it
CF selecting close will not close TB. Nothing happens. I have to maximize
CF it again and close it the regular way.

confirmed here.

Another thing I miss is the conter in the comlumns for total and
unread messages (see png)

-- 
Regards,
Feli

The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
BayesIt! 0.8.0 Releaseattachment: column.png
 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Paul Van Noord
2/27/2005  8:20 AM

Hi Mary,

On 2/27/2005 Mary Bull wrote:


MB This is so that I can protect myself from inadvertently putting a
MB graphics image into a message-text bodyin the View Folder window.

MB I am just one old-lady user. But I think perhaps there are others with
MB my needs using TB!, or out there as potential users, and it would be
MB so simple to respect this need of mine by having the capability OFF by
MB Default.

MB I have, in the past, actually been distracted and clicked Send, on the
MB warning box that comes before a message is Sent, without intending to.
MB At a computer screen, even the best of us make mistakes, I think. I'd
MB like for the individual user to be able to choose, in regard to this
MB particular functionality, the amount of risk for mistakes that the
MB user is comfortable with.

MB Note, however, that I do not object to others accepting more risk than
MB I do. :)

Agreed. Gee-whiz functionality at the expense of privacy and security
is too high of a price for me to pay. I do object to others taking
risks if doing so has an impact on others. Irresponsibility begins as
soon we allow our actions to negatively affect someone else.

-- 
Take Care,
Paul

The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4 



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 12:34:03, Richard Wakeford wrote:

 Paint Shop Pro version 9. So do I need to save the whole file as an
 alpha channel? I just did the alterations straight into the png file as
 it shows, didn't select anything.

PSP9 should work. Just make sure that you don't flatten the image, and if
you use PNG Optimizer, you have to use 16.7 Million Colors, Alpha Channel
Transparency and Existing image transparency settings.

-- 
 Jernej Simoncic  http://deepthought.ena.si/ 

[The Bat! v3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha on Windows NT Clone 5.2.3790.]

Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
   -- Shaw's Principle



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

2005-02-27 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Feli Wilcke,

Sunday, February 27, 2005 
you let us know -at least in parts- :

 Another thing I miss is the conter in the comlumns for total and
 unread messages

Will not show up here either, the counter does not work.


-- 
regards
Charlene
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:star:






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

2005-02-27 Thread Cees
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 14:33 uur dat jij iets schreef over 
'3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available' :

Hallo Charlene,
  
 Another thing I miss is the conter in the comlumns for total and
 unread messages

CF Will not show up here either, the counter does not work.

 that's odd that works just fine here.

-- 
groeten, 
 Cees

Life without danger is a waste of oxygen.
__
The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha [A12F0392] running on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 
Service Pack 2



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0508-3, 25-02-2005
Tested on: 27-2-2005 14:38:42
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Paul!

On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 7:26 AM, you wrote:

MB Note, however, that I do not object to others accepting more risk than
MB I do. :)

 Agreed. Gee-whiz functionality at the expense of privacy and security
 is too high of a price for me to pay. I do object to others taking
 risks if doing so has an impact on others. Irresponsibility begins as
 soon we allow our actions to negatively affect someone else.

Thank you for expanding my thought. I agree completely with your last
sentence. This all comes down to looking out for our neighbors as well
as ourselves. Here, as in so many parts of our lives, it's a judgment
call on the priorities. Sometimes compromises are necessary, when not
negatively affecting one neighbor will result in negatively affecting
another.

I like the words of the old Hypocratic oath: First, do no harm.

One can at least strive for that.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2







 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


OT Re: Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Krzysztof Trybowski
Hello Jernej,
On Sunday, February 27, 2005 you wrote:


 if you use PNG Optimizer, you have to use 16.7 Million Colors, Alpha
 Channel Transparency and Existing image transparency settings.

Are  you  saying  that  PSP  still  doesn't support alpha channel with
palettes? I thought they were supposed to enhance png support!


-- 
 / Krzysztof Trybowski  pgp 0xE0F7733B  /--/  To get my pgp key, put  /
/ www.trybik.jest.okey.pl   GG 1458144 /--/  send_key in subject.  /_
:Krzysztof_Trybowski:
Using The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 build 2600.




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

2005-02-27 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Feli,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW Another thing I miss is the conter in the comlumns for total and
FW unread messages (see png)

Gosh, I have always had those columns in the account tree (where they
work with me).

-- 
Regards, Richard

| The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha  SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| Opera 8.00 build 7401




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[3]: 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available

2005-02-27 Thread Cees
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 14:38 uur dat jij iets schreef over 
'3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha is now available' :

Hallo Cees,

 Another thing I miss is the conter in the comlumns for total and
 unread messages

CF Will not show up here either, the counter does not work.
C  that's odd that works just fine here.

 Oops...  reacted  to fast... I thought you meant in the accountcolumn, where
 they  still  work  as  a  matter of fact. But indeed, after adding those two
 columns  and marking a message unread it appears that that function does NOT
 work.

-- 
groeten, 
 Cees

PUNNY BOOK = Neither a Borrower: Nora Lender Bee.

The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha [A12F0392] running on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 
Service Pack 2



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0508-3, 25-02-2005
Tested on: 27-2-2005 14:46:56
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jernej,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

JS PSP9 should work. Just make sure that you don't flatten the image, and if
JS you use PNG Optimizer, you have to use 16.7 Million Colors, Alpha Channel
JS Transparency and Existing image transparency settings.

No luck still. All it's done is boosted the size of the file from 120 to
156kb!

-- 
Regards,
Richard

| The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha  SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| Opera 8.00 build 7401




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Allie,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 07:07:44 [GMT -0500] (which was 5:07 AM where
I live) you wrote:
A Yeah. A good technical argument rather than all the other
A philosophical and hyped ones that I had seen until then.

Well, philosophically, I don't want it either! grin

A OTOH, one wonders, why implement anything at all then if we look at
A it in that depressingly unsurmountable all-or-none fashion.

If it's an e-mail function, then go for it. I'd just much rather have
RITLabs sink 200 hours into IMAP rather than HTML functionality. IMAP
belongs to e-mail, HTML doesn't.

A The original request was about retrieving images on a per message
A basis with the ability to configure such behaviour. Now it has gone
A into TB! being able to render and display everything a browser can,
A now, and for the future.

It would have gone there anyway. First getting images displayed, and
then getting HTML e-mail to display the way the author intended it
(we've already seen those requests), and then we can't just have half
the equation, people will want the ability to generate HTML e-mail
(they already can to a certain degree), and if we do that, not only
does TB have to be able to display HTML according to standards, but
it's got to be able to write it too. Look at all the WYSIWYG editors
that already exist that are solely for the purpose of HTML editing. If
they can't get it right, how is RITLabs going to get it right without
dedicating ungodly hours to it. Hours which could be spent on IMAP,
plugin API etc. I remember saying ages ago, that I would like to see
the plugin API really fleshed out, and then people could write an HTML
plugin if they wanted.

A Most clients with very good HTML mail displaying capabilities
A either use the IE rendering engine or are part of an established
A browser, i.e., Operamail or Mozilla/ThunderBird.

Exactly Tie in to the crippled and immensely vulnerable IE which
to RITLabs everlasting credit, did *not* do. Or write their own. They
wrote their own, and that means if they are going to do it right in
TB, then there will be a BatWeb browser product on the market soon
enough. I don't need another browser. There's a whole boatload of them
to choose from. What I want is a really good e-mail program that
isn't interested in trying to be the alpha and the omega!



-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
Latest survey shows that 3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the
world's population.

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

A Hi Paul,
A  On 27/2/2005 6:21 AM, you wrote:

A At  least  not  for  the foreseeable future. Most clients with very
A good  HTML mail displaying capabilities either use the IE rendering
A engine  or  are  part of an established browser, i.e., Operamail or
A Mozilla/ThunderBird.

It's  really  easy  then.  They could provide us users a way to choose
between  the HTML internal engine or the IE engine. That way, everyone
would be happy! :)

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Robot:  Your plastic pal who's fun to be with.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[3]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

PVN Agreed.  Gee-whiz  functionality  at  the  expense of privacy and
PVN security  is  too  high  of a price for me to pay. I do object to
PVN others  taking  risks  if  doing  so  has  an  impact  on others.
PVN Irresponsibility   begins   as  soon  we  allow  our  actions  to
PVN negatively affect someone else.

If  it's  something  you  can  switch on or off then you're in no more
danger than being alive.

I'm sure you manage to get a better justification!

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

WordPerfect and MegaMail, what a pair!!



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Krzysztof Trybowski
Hello Tony,
On Saturday, February 26, 2005 you wrote:

  3 months time, The Bat has the best html engine of any email client
  available... Still no working flawless IMAP ability but great comic book
  features. Hands up all those who are going to be jumping for joy and hands
  up all those are *still* going to be using Thunderbird?

You  know  this is not gonna happen. Why don't you just try to look at
the  case  in  a  sensible  way, and not exaggerate it in all possible
directions?

Nobody  wrote they wanted RIT to drop everything (especially IMAP, but
you could place anything instead) and focus on a browser engine better
than Gecko (would take more than 3 months anyway).

This  topic  is  not  about  HTML  support,  but about external images
downloading.  Except it is linked with HTML it has nothing to it. It's
more about http.

External  images  downloading  is  NOT  about comic book. With as much
right  I  could  say,  that  your IMAP support is just for you to play
after  work,  and as such doesn't require much attention nor priority.
Technical  tools are just that -- tools. You can use them in different
ways.  The  same  applies  to external images downloading -- it can be
useful in everyday _*WORK*_.

And  Ritlabs  said many times, that different people work on different
areas.  I wouldn't be afraid that everything else would get dumped. Of
course  *some*  resources  would  have  to  be  spent  on  the feature
discussed,  but I believe that only to a sensible extent, and it would
benefit  many users. After all there *is* a reason why this discussion
comes back again and again.

Regards,

-- 
 / Krzysztof Trybowski  pgp 0xE0F7733B  /--/  To get my pgp key, put  /
/ www.trybik.jest.okey.pl   GG 1458144 /--/  send_key in subject.  /_
:Krzysztof_Trybowski:
Using The Bat! 3.0.2.10  under Windows XP 5.1 build 2600.




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

LG If  it's  an e-mail function, then go for it. I'd just much rather
LG have   RITLabs   sink   200  hours  into  IMAP  rather  than  HTML
LG functionality. IMAP belongs to e-mail, HTML doesn't.

It's part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up the usage
of  email,  they  must  go  along with the major players and the major
players do have GOOD HTML support.


LG is  RITLabs going to get it right without dedicating ungodly hours
LG to  it.  Hours  which  could  be  spent on IMAP, plugin API etc. I
LG remember  saying ages ago, that I would like to see the plugin API
LG really  fleshed out, and then people could write an HTML plugin if
LG they wanted.

If  I  had  the  same  attitude that a few other showed up I would say
something like I don't use IMAP, I don't care if it has bugs or not I
rather have HTML rendered correctly but I find both things important.


-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Mental tangibility has been achieved...go figure.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Greg,

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, at 22:09:57 [GMT -0600] (which was 9:09 PM where
I live) you wrote:
GS This thread is really about opinions. Everyone has one. :-)

Hey, you forgot to type out the rest of that saying! grin

GS This is a very important point which should not be lost in the
GS debate about opinions.

I don't think anyone has. RITLabs thrust was and still is (see how
they market it on their page) a secure product, immune to viruses,
protected, a safe alternative etc. If RITLabs decided to abandon that
marketing platform, then they need to get rid of those types of
bullets and throw out ones like, a secure product, well, only if you
know what you're doing and you don't enable any features that we send
to your disabled etc..


 XHTML, WCAG, CSS, Section 508 are moving targets.
GS Isn't most of the software / IT market a moving target?  :-)

To a certain extent. How long has RFC-822/2822 been around. How much
has it changed? The answer... *forever* (in computer years), and
almost none. XHTML just published 1.0 a cpl years back, then XHTML
1.1 really recently, and now 2.0 is nearly done. I've been in IT for a
long time, and that's one of the first standards I've seen evolve that
quickly. WCAG and Section 508 are heavily driven by XHTML and they
also have a heavy influence in where XHTML is going. Those in turn are
going to be driving how the HTML standard, currently v4, will evolve.
It's a huge nasty bowl of spaghetti.

RITLabs, IMHO, needs to stick with the meaty bowl of Ravioli.


GS Don't you really want your email client to be just text based?
GS What about the users who want HTML in their email?

Absolutely! I'm not trying to be difficult or facetious. If I want to
view an HTML message, I double click it to view it in a browser.
There's no ambiguity about a link pretending to be from my bank but
actually going to Mr. Hackers neighborhood.

GS Being a user of technology both professionally and personally for
GS many years the ONLY one sure guarantee in the technology market is
GS CHANGE. Businesses in this market need to CHANGE with the market.

Not all change is good. Is TB to have a September that never ends?



-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
A .GIF is worth a thousand .TXT's.

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi MAU,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 12:14:17 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:14 AM where
I live) you wrote:
M Why don't you use TB for newsgroups also? Works beautifully with
M MyGate.

And see! That's a plugin. I'd completely bow out of the HTML
resistance movement if HTML support was done completely by plugin.


-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
A 1200 baud brain attached to a 28800 baud mouth.

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Goncalo,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 14:07:07 [GMT +] (which was 7:07 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF If it's something you can switch on or off then you're in no more
GF danger than being alive.

GF I'm sure you manage to get a better justification!

Let's expound a bit on this though Goncalo. Why exactly is it that IE
is so vulnerable in so many ways? It's because IE, like many other
Microsoft products, tries to do it all. Well, that's only part of the
reason, they try to integrate so much cross application functionality
is a better answer. They did this because users wanted this and users
wanted that. They did it because Microsoft wanted a bigger market
share. They wanted to dominate. They wanted to be able to do it all.

But they screwed up. Users began to realize that functionality at the
cost of security wasn't acceptable. Microsoft won the browser war, but
it was a short lived win. What good are the spoils of war if they
really are spoiled and tainted.

Now granted. IE made their primary mistake because everything was on
by default. But my point is that Microsoft gave the users what they
wanted without ever trying to tell them why it was risky. The internet
used to be a wonderful place, now you have to check, double-check and
triple check just about everything you do. Popups were a great idea at
first. A nice way to display information without disrupting the flow
of the visitors browsing of their main site. Now we have a whole box
of bandaids to prevent popups.

What I'm getting at is that the populace in general needs people like
Tony and Paul and myself to try and keep the sanity. Most people on
this list are more tech savvy than the rest of the population, and for
every user we have here on the list, we have 20 that aren't. People
who won't know why enabling the download of images can be a Bad Thing
(tm), or why clicking the Go to our website to validate your bank
account links almost never take you to your bank, or why Nigerian
scams are just that, scams. People are *still* getting sucked into
those scams. How long have those been around? Forever. But they still
get people.

People talk about applications nannying them. I agree, for us, the
people in the know, hate it. I hate it. But you tell me a viable way
to protect those not in the know and I'll go along with it.

A whitelist? It isn't going to work... How do I know this? I can't
tell you how many software firewalls I've installed for people.
Literally, close to a hundred would be my guess. I do it for every
friend/family member/co-worker that I can. I even try to explain when
you should and shouldn't allow something. It doesn't work. They
eventually just start clicking yes to anything and everything, and
they're no more protected than they were before I installed the
firewall.

Take PCWSmileys and Rogues. We (9val and I) worked out a system to
have trusted servers with which TB could automatically download images
from. The same thing we're talking about doing for HTML images. Yet,
we decided to drop it because there was no way to make it foolproof.
Even if we were able to convince users to only include the PCWize
server, you all had to rely on my security knowledge and expertise to
ensure my server wasn't compromised. That's a lot of faith to put in
me. I'm good at it, but I'm not perfect. Somebody, someday will crack
my server. It hasn't happened in the three years it's been on-line,
but it will one day. I don't hope for it, but I expect it.

People in general do need to be protected from themselves. It makes it
rough on those of us in the know, but if it means my mom and dad are
protected I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of so-called functionality
to do that.


-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
When you go into court you are putting yourself in the hands of 12
people that weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty.

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: OT Re: Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 14:41:29, Krzysztof Trybowski wrote:

 Are  you  saying  that  PSP  still  doesn't support alpha channel with
 palettes?

Can you show me one program that can create palletized PNGs with alpha
transparency? The only one I know of is an old DOS compile of PNMTOPNG from
1996.

-- 
 Jernej Simoncic  http://deepthought.ena.si/ 

[The Bat! v3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha on Windows NT Clone 5.2.3790.]

Every employee begins at his level of competence.
   -- Peter's Hidden Postulate According to Godin



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 14:56:48, Richard Wakeford wrote:

 No luck still. All it's done is boosted the size of the file from 120 to
 156kb!

How does the image appear when you're editing it - the background should be
checkered, and the size of checkers should not change when you zoom in/out.

-- 
 Jernej Simoncic  http://deepthought.ena.si/ 

[The Bat! v3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha on Windows NT Clone 5.2.3790.]

Bad regulation begets worse regulation.
   -- Mobil's Maxim



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Download new Beta?

2005-02-27 Thread milis
where to download this new beta?  Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha ? i
cann't found on new beta pages.


 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


LG Hi Goncalo,

LG On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 14:07:07 [GMT +] (which was 7:07 AM where
LG I live) you wrote:

GF I'm sure you manage to get a better justification!

LG Let's expound a bit on this though Goncalo. Why exactly is it that
LG IE  is  so  vulnerable in so many ways? It's because IE, like many
LG other  Microsoft  products,  tries to do it all. Well, that's only
LG part   of  the  reason,  they  try  to  integrate  so  much  cross
LG application  functionality  is  a  better  answer.  They  did this
LG because  users  wanted  this  and  users  wanted that. They did it
LG because  Microsoft  wanted  a  bigger market share. They wanted to
LG dominate. They wanted to be able to do it all.

I  disagree.  It's  vulnerable because MS was unable to anticipate the
misuse  of  the  technology they were providing. Now they made it more
secure  (not  perfectly secure) without cutting down the functionality
that people had.


LG But  they screwed up. Users began to realize that functionality at
LG the  cost of security wasn't acceptable. Microsoft won the browser
LG war, but it was a short lived win. What good are the spoils of war
LG if they really are spoiled and tainted.

Power comes at a cost. It's not acceptable to have limits because some
people   just  don't  know  any better. The car makers don't put speed
limits  in their cars because they might be bought by some lame driver
that may kill himself.


LG Now  granted. IE made their primary mistake because everything was
LG on  by  default.  But  my point is that Microsoft gave the users
LG what  they  wanted  without  ever  trying  to tell them why it was
LG risky.  The internet used to be a wonderful place, now you have to
LG check, double-check and triple check just about everything you do.
LG Popups  were  a  great  idea  at  first.  A  nice  way  to display
LG information  without  disrupting the flow of the visitors browsing
LG of their main site. Now we have a whole box of bandaids to prevent
LG popups.

MS didn't realize how their technology could be misused...


LG What  I'm  getting at is that the populace in general needs people
LG like  Tony  and  Paul  and myself to try and keep the sanity. Most

Plase...


LG people  on  this  list  are  more  tech savvy than the rest of the
LG population,  and  for every user we have here on the list, we have
LG 20 that aren't. People who won't know why enabling the download of
LG images  can  be  a  Bad Thing (tm), or why clicking the Go to our
LG website to validate your bank account links almost never take you
LG to  your  bank, or why Nigerian scams are just that, scams. People
LG are  *still*  getting sucked into those scams. How long have those
LG been around? Forever. But they still get people.

Make an easy mode for 'rookie' users and a Power mode for power users.


LG People talk about applications nannying them. I agree, for us, the
LG people  in  the know, hate it. I hate it. But you tell me a viable
LG way to protect those not in the know and I'll go along with it.

You  don't really convince me that you hate that. In fact, you seem to
like  it alot.

I  like  to be able to do everything and then choose what I don't want
to do just because I want to not because I can't.


LG People  in  general  do  need  to be protected from themselves. It
LG makes  it rough on those of us in the know, but if it means my mom
LG and  dad are protected I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of so-called
LG functionality to do that.

I  disagree.  That sort of speak is good for the big brother watching
you.


-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Editing is a rewording activity.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Download new Beta?

2005-02-27 Thread Vadim Yavorsky
Good evening, 

Sunday, February 27, 2005, 6:48:29 PM, you wrote:
 
muo where to download this new beta?  Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha ? i
muo cann't found on new beta pages.

Stefan write to this list at Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:37:33 +0200

==
Hello All,

  3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha :-) is now available
  http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb30901.rar

  Basically, it's a raw skeleton of the upcoming Beta - there will be a
  single file available as soon as the Alpha stage is finished (i.e. the
  *.def and *.dll files will be moved into the EXE). Please make sure that
  all files from the archive are located in the start up directory.

  It's an Alpha, so please be aware of the numerous bugs and omissions -
  please feel free to mention them here or at the BT.

-- 
Cheers!
 Stefan
==
-- 
Best regards, Vadim Yavorsky mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], NoBat.RU site master. 
Welcome to http://www.nobat.ru - Russian unofficial The Bat! Support Pages - 
The best information resource.
Use The Bat! (Serial¹ E03D3498) ver:3.0.2.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 
Service Pack 2 





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Alpha icons

2005-02-27 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jernej,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

JS How does the image appear when you're editing it - the background should be
JS checkered, and the size of checkers should not change when you zoom in/out.

Yup, exactly that. What I can't understand is, if I have changed the
icons to different colours and saved the file, how on earth are the
original colours being displayed when they shouldn't be there any more.
Strange.

-- 
Regards,
Richard

| The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha  SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| Opera 8.00 build 7401




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[3]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Dennis Hays
Hello Goncalo,

Sunday, February 27, 2005, 10:51:37 AM, you wrote:


 In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

 I  disagree.  It's  vulnerable because MS was unable to anticipate the
 misuse  of  the  technology they were providing. Now they made it more
 secure  (not  perfectly secure) without cutting down the functionality
 that people had.
  snipped

 Power comes at a cost. It's not acceptable to have limits because some
 people   just  don't  know  any better. The car makers don't put speed
 limits  in their cars because they might be bought by some lame driver
 that may kill himself.


LG Now  granted. IE made their primary mistake because everything was
LG on  by  default.  But  my point is that Microsoft gave the users
LG what  they  wanted  without  ever  trying  to tell them why it was
LG risky.  The internet used to be a wonderful place, now you have to
LG check, double-check and triple check just about everything you do.
LG Popups  were  a  great  idea  at  first.  A  nice  way  to display
LG information  without  disrupting the flow of the visitors browsing
LG of their main site. Now we have a whole box of bandaids to prevent
LG popups.

 MS didn't realize how their technology could be misused...

 snipped 


Firstly, speed limits in cars is a weak argument. People know their
cars can go faster, they don't often know where security exploits are
in any operating system. And, your retort about Microsoft not knowing
how their technology could be misused is also fairly weak. When MS
tied the browser to the operating system (Windows), it was a reaction
to their marketing goals of tying the personal computer to the
web--strictly networking. The reasons why their technology can be
misused is that the OS and IE are joined to such a degree that MS, in
a court deposition, said they couldn't be separated without losing the
OS integrity.

This, then is the rub. But then you could say if the browsers gain
popularity, then they too will be exploited. Yes, if they do it's
because of the holes in the OS... poor coding to rush a product to
market.

That Bill came out a year or so back and said he is making security a
priority begs the question, why now? --why not years ago?

And to bring this back to on-topic... designing a HTML interface to
TB! means making certain the doors between the client and os are
locked securely and then give the key to the user.

Dennis


  -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
 Dennis Hays / HaysDesign
 http://www.haysdesign.com
 Sent on Sunday, February 27, 2005 at 11:26 AM USA Eastern
 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
 ICQ: 200045507 / AIM: edennishays 
 yahoo: dennishays / Jabber: dennishays



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Goncalo,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 15:51:37 [GMT +] (which was 8:51 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF I disagree. It's vulnerable because MS was unable to anticipate
GF the misuse of the technology they were providing. Now they made it
GF more secure (not perfectly secure) without cutting down the
GF functionality that people had.

Sure they did. MS hosts a page listing hundreds of applications they
broke by trying to fix their mistakes.


GF Power comes at a cost. It's not acceptable to have limits because
GF some people just don't know any better. The car makers don't put
GF speed limits in their cars because they might be bought by some
GF lame driver that may kill himself.

You've never heard of governors? They're on nearly every US military
vehicle. And many high performance vehicles have them in case you loan
your car to your kid. You put a key in, and enable the governor.

So let's look at it for people who are incapable of being a safe
driver. They lose their license, they are put in jail, they are
required to have interlock devices installed in their vehicles (drunk
driving). ISPs already shut down spammer accounts or accounts of
people doing things illegally. Are you ready to have your ISP shut
down your account because you enabled some functionality without fully
understanding the ramifications? There's already legislation in the
works to make users financially responsible for damages caused by
their lack of security awareness. There are even companies that have
successfully sued other companies that caused damages to their
networks due to poor security. If you don't mind shelling out the big
buck for something that could have simply been mitigated by not
opening the door in the first place, then go for Outlook. Friends love
friends who send them viruses and spam.

GF MS didn't realize how their technology could be misused...

And RITLabs is going to be able to foresee the future any better than
they? MS has boatloads of money, resources and analysts. Is RITLabs
going to be able to afford that and do a better job?

LG What  I'm  getting at is that the populace in general needs people
LG like  Tony  and  Paul  and myself to try and keep the sanity. Most
GF Plase...

Please yourself. Join some groups on XHTML right now. You'll see many,
many people like Tony, Paul, and myself trying to get W3C to stop the
madness. Unfortunately in this day and age, silence implies consent.

If people like us don't show objective reasoning as to why something
isn't a good idea, then it's all going to become garbage.

GF Make an easy mode for 'rookie' users and a Power mode for power
GF users.

Yeah right. The first time a user has to turn on advanced mode just
so they can see images in HTML messages, they'll have it enabled and
then god knows what else they'll turn on.

GF You don't really convince me that you hate that. In fact, you seem
GF to like it alot.

What because I don't want HTML in my e-mail. If that's all you're
basing it off of, then you're right. I don't hate that TB doesn't
support HTML fully.

GF I like to be able to do everything and then choose what I don't
GF want to do just because I want to not because I can't.

For tech savvy users this is fine. I worked for AOL for a while in DSL
tech support. I'm not going to say all AOL users are boneheads, but as
a techy, AOL people scare the living daylights out of me!

GF I disagree. That sort of speak is good for the big brother
GF watching you.

Yeah, preventing images in HTML mail means RITLabs is watching you.
Makes a lot of sense. You win.. and I quote.. Plase...



-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
A bottle in front of me's better than a frontal lobotomy

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread MAU
Hello Leif,

 And see! That's a plugin. I'd completely bow out of the HTML
 resistance movement if HTML support was done completely by plugin.

MyGate is not even a plugin, it's just a gateway. And as for HTML, I
will not enter into the discussion. If I receive an HTML e-mail and I
want to see it, I can see it with a double click just like for any
attachment. So, no big problem for me.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[4]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


DH Firstly, speed limits in cars is a weak argument. People know their
DH cars can go faster, they don't often know where security exploits are
DH in any operating system. And, your retort about Microsoft not knowing
DH how their technology could be misused is also fairly weak. When MS

When it comes to drive in the limits, speed is not the only factor the
car maker has to take care of.

I  really  don't care about other users, I care about my needs and if I
can accomplish them with the software I'm using.

I  need  that some bugs/feature to be smooth in TB!'s HTML support and
that's why I push it.

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Contents may settle during shipment.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Goncalo,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 14:15:19 [GMT +] (which was 7:15 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF It's part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up the
GF usage of email, they must go along with the major players and the
GF major players do have GOOD HTML support.

So if your friend jumps off a bridge, you're going to do it too?

Remember Opera? They refused to improperly render HTML pages due to
sloppy markup. They caught flack over it for sure, but they stuck to
their guns. They're still very popular.

The reason other players have good HTML support is that these other
player also write browsers. They implement their browser into their
e-mail product. Do I have anything against TB writing their own
browser... Nope. Would I rather they spend the time making TB a better
and more solid product for *e-mail*. Definitely.


GF If I had the same attitude that a few other showed up I would say
GF something like I don't use IMAP, I don't care if it has bugs or
GF not I rather have HTML rendered correctly but I find both things
GF important.

IMAP is part of e-mail. HTML isn't. Poor argument.



-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
 A BIG ROCKmeA HARD PLACE

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Goncalo,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 17:01:39 [GMT +] (which was 10:01 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF I really don't care about other users, I care about my needs and
GF if I can accomplish them with the software I'm using.

Exactly the poor attitude Tony, Paul and I are trying to curtail. The
completely selfish, me first attitude. Let the rest of the world
suffer as long as I get what I want.

Cookidence...


-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
deja moo, the feeling that you've heard this bull before.

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Greg Strong
Hello MAU,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:14:17 +0100 GMT(2/27/2005, 5:14 AM -0600 GMT), 
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MAU wrote:

 Because of the VA situation I moved on to TB for email, and use Agent
 for newsgroups.

 Why don't you use TB for newsgroups also? Works beautifully with MyGate.

Probably not a good reason, but I owned Agent before I knew of MyGate
and I got used to it.

-- 
Best Regards,
Greg Strong 

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Leif,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:03:03 -0700 GMT(2/27/2005, 11:03 AM -0600 GMT), 
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Leif Gregory wrote:

 Cookidence...

 
 -- 
 Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
 
 Tagline of the day:
 deja moo, the feeling that you've heard this bull before.

ROFLMAO!!!

-- 
Best Regards,
Greg Strong 

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Thomas,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 10:52:59 [GMT +0700] (which was 8:52 PM where
I live) you wrote:
TF I thinnk most have left, because we don't even get replies to
TF http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001762

It's sad too. Just in the time that I wrote my tutorial for validation
I've gotten quite a bit of e-mail about it. This isn't something
people just want, it's something people really need. Just like we need
wheelchair accessible ramps to businesses, we need applications people
with disabilities can use.

TF You are saying that it will be technically difficult to implement
TF correct HTML rendering, and I don't doubt it.

Only in the sense that it will be a huge investment of time in which
RITLabs will have to recode the HTML rendering and eventually
generation engines to keep up with out of control, rapidly evolving
standards (not to mention even conflicting ones).

TF However, Tony says it;'s wrong from a philosophical / political
TF POV to introduce correct renedering to TB. I see a difference
TF here.

There is a difference, but I also happen to agree with Tony. He'd just
beat that horse to death, so I decided on a different tact.

TF That's OK, it's your choice. TB lacking this and having to open
TF the browser is certainly bad for marketing, though. You mentioned
TF above that Ritlabs is a for-profit organisation.

So is Opera, and they're doing well. They adhere to much stricter
standards when rendering HTML which means there are a lot of webpages
out there that don't render as the author intended it.



-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
He's not stupid; he's possessed by a retarded ghost. 

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Leif,

  A reminder of what Leif Gregory on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 18:13:24 GMT +0100

LG Exactly the poor attitude Tony, Paul and I are trying to curtail

 Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
 before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
 everyone else.

 The way I see it there will be this version I'm using now without it and a
 new version with it. If I choose I want to continue using this version
 without it will RITLABS continue to support this version and fix all the
 existing bugs? I don't think so!

 All the current bugs will be carried over to the new version and those
 that don't want total html support will be left with a half finished, bug
 ridden non supported old version.


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

GF the  misuse  of the technology they were providing. Now they made
GF it  more  secure  (not perfectly secure) without cutting down the
GF functionality that people had.

LG Sure  they  did.  MS hosts a page listing hundreds of applications
LG they broke by trying to fix their mistakes.

Can  you  post  the  link?  I'm  curious.  Even  though,  they  broke
third-party apps not their own! :)


GF some  people just don't know any better. The car makers don't put
GF speed  limits  in their cars because they might be bought by some
GF lame driver that may kill himself.

LG You've  never  heard  of  governors?  They're  on  nearly every US
LG military  vehicle. And many high performance vehicles have them in
LG case  you  loan your car to your kid. You put a key in, and enable
LG the governor.

Correct  me  if I'm wrong but isn't this example what we're requesting
and that you prefer not to have because most people might not know how
to enable the 'governor'? You prefer to not have the technology rather
than  have  it  there  but  disabled  by default. I find that attitude
wrong.


LG So  let's  look at it for people who are incapable of being a safe
LG driver.  They  lose  their license, they are put in jail, they are
LG required  to  have  interlock  devices installed in their vehicles
LG (drunk  driving).  ISPs  already  shut  down  spammer  accounts or
LG accounts  of  people doing things illegally. Are you ready to have
LG your   ISP  shut  down  your  account  because  you  enabled  some
LG functionality   without  fully  understanding  the  ramifications?

I don't qualify for that example! :)


LG something that could have simply been mitigated by not opening the
LG door in the first place, then go for Outlook. Friends love friends
LG who send them viruses and spam.

Yeah,  RitLabs  must  be  tremendously  happy  with  you sending their
customers to other software vendors just because you believe that your
vision and needs are better then everybody else.


GF Make  an  easy mode for 'rookie' users and a Power mode for power
GF users.

LG Yeah  right.  The first time a user has to turn on advanced mode
LG just  so  they  can  see  images in HTML messages, they'll have it
LG enabled and then god knows what else they'll turn on.

And so what? Are you the cop of email world? Do you dictate the rules?
Warn them about the dangers of turning that option ON.


GF I like to be able to do everything and then choose what I don't
GF want to do just because I want to not because I can't.

LG For tech savvy users this is fine. I worked for AOL for a while in
LG DSL  tech  support.  I'm  not  going  to  say  all  AOL  users are
LG boneheads,  but  as a techy, AOL people scare the living daylights
LG out of me!

Cars aren't sold just for good drivers, big maniacs can also buy them.


GF I disagree. That sort of speak is good for the big brother
GF watching you.

LG Yeah, preventing images in HTML mail means RITLabs is watching you.
LG Makes a lot of sense. You win.. and I quote.. Plase...

Your  vision  and how you're defending it is, not Ritlabs. They didn't
post any position on this.



-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

If anything -can't- go wrong, it will



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


GF It's  part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up the
GF usage of email, they must go along with the major players and the
GF major players do have GOOD HTML support.

LG So if your friend jumps off a bridge, you're going to do it too?

No comments. It doesn't apply.


LG Remember  Opera?  They refused to improperly render HTML pages due
LG to  sloppy  markup.  They  caught flack over it for sure, but they
LG stuck to their guns. They're still very popular.

Yeah,  right.  With  less  then 2% of market share the last time I saw
some statistics their must be very popular.


LG The  reason  other  players have good HTML support is that these
LG other  player  also  write  browsers. They implement their browser
LG into  their  e-mail product. Do I have anything against TB writing
LG their  own  browser...  Nope.  Would  I rather they spend the time
LG making   TB   a  better  and  more  solid  product  for  *e-mail*.
LG Definitely.

Why  not integrate, as an option, the IE engine into the TB? You don't
want  to  use  it, fine, stick with internal render engine. People who
don't mind do as they want to.

Who  are  you  anyway  to impose your view and your way to others? Why
can't the product have alternatives just because you don't like them?
I don't like IMAP. Did you saw me requesting to cut it off TB?


GF If I had the same attitude that a few other showed up I would say
GF something like I don't use IMAP, I don't care if it has bugs or
GF not I rather have HTML rendered correctly but I find both things
GF important.

LG IMAP is part of e-mail. HTML isn't. Poor argument.

It's  not?  Then  I must hallucinating because I receive loads of HTML
emails.

It may not be official but it SURELY is part of email current usage.


-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

He who fart in church, sit in pew



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread David Calvarese
Goncalo Farias wrote:
 It's  really  easy  then.  They could provide us users a way to choose
 between  the HTML internal engine or the IE engine. That way, everyone
 would be happy! :)

Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole?  Gecko (From
Firefox/Mozilla) would be a better idea.



-- 
Dave Calvarese
Member of E-mailaholics International
PGP Key Available at http://home.comcast.net/~dhcalva/DavidCalvarese-DH.asc


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

GF I  really don't care about other users, I care about my needs and
GF if I can accomplish them with the software I'm using.

LG Exactly  the poor attitude Tony, Paul and I are trying to curtail.
LG The  completely  selfish,  me  first attitude. Let the rest of the
LG world suffer as long as I get what I want.
LG Cookidence...

Isn't  it  exactly  the  same  attitude  you're exhibiting? Did anyone
mandate  you  to  define what is allowable or not in email usage? What
feature  can  or  cannot  be  included?  What  alternatives to current
features can be implemented or not?


--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Hi, I'm Barney... BLAM! Now you're extinct.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread The Final Cut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Tony Boom

On Sunday, February 27, 2005, at 1:04:51 PM
You wrote:

TB Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
TB  before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
TB  everyone else.


Didnt you say earlier in the threat that this feature has been requested for 
around 4 years?

- --
The Final Cut
Thebat: 3.0.2.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFCIhBfmZdOAsVmU04RAgmMAJ9y8PUQnn3feBsr4F0rNxnfp9vyYwCdG+qG
St3dbdW1t2+uNOiWZQ8VTO0=
=n0u/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Cees
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 18:19 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html 
whitelist wish' :

Hallo Greg,

 Cookidence...
 Tagline of the day:
 deja moo, the feeling that you've heard this bull before.

GS ROFLMAO!!!

 Yeah! I stole that one immediately for my own taglinelist hehehe... it's
 great!

-- 
groeten, 
 Cees

I don't care who you are, Fatso. Get the reindeer off my roof!

The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha [A12F0392] running on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 
Service Pack 2



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0508-3, 25-02-2005
Tested on: 27-2-2005 19:26:57
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


DC Goncalo Farias wrote:
 It's  really  easy  then.  They could provide us users a way to choose
 between  the HTML internal engine or the IE engine. That way, everyone
 would be happy! :)

DC Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole?  Gecko (From
DC Firefox/Mozilla) would be a better idea.

What ever. It was just and example. They could use Webster Pro control
to cut the development (HTML 3.2 is fully supported, including Frames)
or something else... I don't care about their technical approach.

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

** ERROR **  Unable to insert witty tagline.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Goncalo,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 18:16:42 [GMT +] (which was 11:16 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF Isn't it exactly the same attitude you're exhibiting? Did anyone
GF mandate you to define what is allowable or not in email usage?
GF What feature can or cannot be included? What alternatives to
GF current features can be implemented or not?

You're confusing someone who actually cares about TB being a truly
good product, and someone who wants TB to be another lemming
application who follows bad practices just because everyone else is
doing it.

Do me a favor. If you aren't going to be part of the solution, at
least don't be part of the problem.


-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
A .GIF is worth a thousand .TXT's.

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


TB Also  the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free
TB Bat  before they make any new additions, they want html right now
TB and Sod everyone else.

TFC Didnt  you  say  earlier in the threat that this feature has been
TFC requested for around 4 years?

And  I  said  that  I  wanted  TB  bugfree  first of all. They tend to
misreading some parts...

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Talk is cheap, because supply exceeds demand



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Cees
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 18:34 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html 
whitelist wish' :

Hallo Greg,

GS Ok now you have me thinking. IIRC didn't you publish a quite lengthy
GS installation for the MyGate plugin or was it MailTraq?
GS If you used both which is better?

 as  always I'm doing several things at the same time... ahdh... sorry, can't
 help it. :-)

 Created  a  real  IMAP4  useraccount in TheBat! ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for testing
 purposes... lot of new options to me. I'll figure them out.

 Secondly...  I'm  using  MailTraq  as  a mailserver (among other things: for
 IMAP,  I  got  influenced  by  Allie  grin ) and am struggling to get that
 newsserver  bit  to  work.  Which  is  harder  than  I thought. And the HELP
 function helps but just a teensy weensy bit ;-))

 I'll let you know when it works.

-- 
groeten, 
 Cees

A gun gives you the body, not the bird.

The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha [A12F0392] running on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 
Service Pack 2



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0508-3, 25-02-2005
Tested on: 27-2-2005 19:30:23
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi David,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 13:15:41 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:15 AM where
I live) you wrote:
DC Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole? Gecko
DC (From Firefox/Mozilla) would be a better idea.

Immensely accurate observation.


-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
 A BIG ROCKmeA HARD PLACE

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Goncalo,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 18:12:40 [GMT +] (which was 11:12 AM where
I live) you wrote:
GF No comments. It doesn't apply.

Lemming analogy. If others do it, it must be ok. Perfectly applicable.

GF Yeah, right. With less then 2% of market share the last time I saw
GF some statistics their must be very popular.

Yeah, Mozilla based browsers are sucking up some serious market share.

GF Why not integrate, as an option, the IE engine into the TB? You
GF don't want to use it, fine, stick with internal render engine.
GF People who don't mind do as they want to.

That is positively the absolute worst idea you've yet proposed. You
want to tie TB in with IEs browser? RITLabs would be better suited
just putting a bullet into their own head. Tie in a nice secure e-mail
program to the world's most notable security sieve!

GF Who are you anyway to impose your view and your way to others? Why
GF can't the product have alternatives just because you don't like
GF them? I don't like IMAP. Did you saw me requesting to cut it off
GF TB?

Just like you. I get to express my opinion and hope RITLabs agrees. If
you feel at all any way imposed upon and believe my opinion holds any
more weight than yours, then you're sadly mistaken.

GF It's not? Then I must hallucinating because I receive loads of
GF HTML emails.

More lemmings?

GF It may not be official but it SURELY is part of email current usage.

Yes, and a fat lot of good it's done us. More spam, more expolits,
more non-techy users having their e-mail blow up in their face and
dragging all their friends down with them by kindly sharing their
special HTML e-mails just because they're in their addressbooks.




-- 
Leif  -:-  TB Lists Moderator  -:-  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F

Tagline of the day:
Ok, I pulled the pin. Now what? Where are you going?

Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat
PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

GF Isn't  it exactly the same attitude you're exhibiting? Did anyone
GF mandate  you  to  define what is allowable or not in email usage?
GF What  feature  can  or  cannot  be included? What alternatives to
GF current features can be implemented or not?

LG You're confusing someone who actually cares about TB being a truly
LG good  product,  and  someone  who  wants  TB to be another lemming

You're wrong. I care about TB but I want it better you seem to want it
your  way. I paid for every paid version since I'm registered. I don't
mind paying I mind with bugs.


LG application  who  follows bad practices just because everyone else
LG is doing it.

Unfortunately TB isn't the only email client and it must be compatible
with   everybody.   What   good  is  an  email client if I'm unable to
exchange (or read) emails with (from) everybody else?


LG Do me a favor. If you aren't going to be part of the solution, at
LG least don't be part of the problem.

That  really applies to you too, don't you think? I have troubles with
HTML  emails that don't seem to affect you. So, do me a favor, be part
of the solution or else...

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Happiness is your favorite program moving to Windows.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 19:48:59 GMT +0100

GF So, do me a favor, be part of the solution or else...

Oh dear, oh dear oh dear. Don't ya just love it when they get violent
because they're losing an argument :)


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


GF Yeah,  right.  With  less then 2% of market share the last time I
GF saw some statistics their must be very popular.

LG Yeah,  Mozilla  based  browsers are sucking up some serious market
LG share.

Mozilla is not related to Opera, the example given by you.


LG That  is  positively  the absolute worst idea you've yet proposed.
LG You  want  to  tie TB in with IEs browser? RITLabs would be better
LG suited  just  putting  a bullet into their own head. Tie in a nice
LG secure e-mail program to the world's most notable security sieve!

Whatever, I said IE like I could have said Gecko or something else.
But  I  think  you're being a little paranoid with the security stuff.
They are much better.


GF It's  not?  Then  I must hallucinating because I receive loads of
GF HTML emails.

LG More lemmings?

Shouldn't you moderate yourself?



GF It  may  not  be  official but it SURELY is part of email current
GF usage.

LG Yes, and a fat lot of good it's done us. More spam, more expolits,
LG more non-techy users having their e-mail blow up in their face and
LG dragging  all their friends down with them by kindly sharing their
LG special HTML e-mails just because they're in their addressbooks.

Like  I said, I real problems with HTML messages (mostly replying) but
you're not pointing out solutions. Probably you don't care with that.

You  seem to be caring with anonymous people security. TB has too much
options for normal non-techie users.

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

He's mostly dead, Jim.  Get Miracle Max.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread MAU
Hello Greg,

 MyGate is not even a plugin, it's just a gateway. And as for HTML, I
 will not enter into the discussion.
 
 Ok now you have me thinking. IIRC didn't you publish a quite lengthy
 installation for the MyGate plugin or was it MailTraq?
 
 If you used both which is better?

That was for MailTraq, much before MyGate was even developed. MyGate is
much more simple to install and configure and it just runs beautifully.
I switched from MailTraq to MyGate as soon as I discovered it.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4






 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


TB Hello Goncalo,

TB   A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB   27 February 2005 at 19:48:59 GMT +0100

GF So, do me a favor, be part of the solution or else...

TB Oh dear, oh dear oh dear. Don't ya just love it when they get violent
TB because they're losing an argument :)

What? You're from the supporting team? :)

I  said  exactly  what he said. If he wants to be part of the solution
fine, if not, please step aside...


-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Many would be cowards if they had courage enough.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 20:05:59 GMT +0100

GF I  said  exactly  what he said. If he wants to be part of the solution
GF fine, if not, please step aside...

 You don't know who he is do you?


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


TB Hello Goncalo,

TB   A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB   27 February 2005 at 20:05:59 GMT +0100

GF I  said  exactly  what he said. If he wants to be part of the solution
GF fine, if not, please step aside...

TB  You don't know who he is do you?

Sure  I  do.  He  is  the  moderator. Did I said anything offensive? I
didn't call lemming to anyone, did I?

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

You can't soar with dragons if you work with gargoyles.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 20:18:06 GMT +0100

GF Sure  I  do.  He  is  the  moderator. Did I said anything offensive? I
GF didn't call lemming to anyone, did I?

 It's not the moderator part that you need to worry about. Why do you think
 NO ONE else is arguing with him least of all me?


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


GF Sure  I do. He is the moderator. Did I said anything offensive? I
GF didn't call lemming to anyone, did I?

TB It's  not  the moderator part that you need to worry about. Why do
TB you think NO ONE else is arguing with him least of all me?

I'll bet you're going to tell me...

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

I KNEW I shouldn't have loaned my Sword+3 to the thief...



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 20:29:19 GMT +0100

GF I'll bet you're going to tell me...

 You bet wrong. I'm not risking that, that's for sure. Now I think it best
 we change the subject.

 Winters nearly over, Australian Grand Prix this Sunday.


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Greg Strong
Hello MAU,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:03:05 +0100 GMT(2/27/2005, 1:03 PM -0600 GMT), 
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MAU wrote:

 That was for MailTraq, much before MyGate was even developed. MyGate is
 much more simple to install and configure and it just runs beautifully.
 I switched from MailTraq to MyGate as soon as I discovered it.

Since I like TB's editor so MUCH more than Agent and the fact that
Agent still hasn't provided multiple server capability, I will
probably take the time in the future to install MyGate.

URL? http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mygate/  Correct?

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Greg Strong 

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


TB  You bet wrong. I'm not risking that, that's for sure. Now I think it best
TB  we change the subject.

I  don't  know and it really doesn't matter much, after all we're just
expressing our points of view.



-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

73% of statistics are made up on the spot.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 20:40:38 GMT +0100

GF I  don't  know and it really doesn't matter much, after all we're just
GF expressing our points of view.

 Just so long as it doesn't differ from his too much you should be OK now
 drop it will you *please*!


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

GF I  don't  know and it really doesn't matter much, after all we're just
GF expressing our points of view.

TB  Just so long as it doesn't differ from his too much you should be OK now
TB  drop it will you *please*!

ahahahahaha...

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

We believe men should fight their own battles.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 20:53:00 GMT +0100

GF ahahahahaha...

 You laugh all you want but I have a wife and family whom I love very much
 and I'm certainly not going to put them at risk for the sake of a html
 argument, I'd rather go back to using Outlook Express.


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread David Calvarese
Tony Boom wrote:
 Hello Leif,
  Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
  before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
  everyone else.

I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now'  And as I've said
before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.

-- 
Dave Calvarese
Member of E-mailaholics International
PGP Key Available at http://home.comcast.net/~dhcalva/DavidCalvarese-DH.asc


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

moving folders

2005-02-27 Thread Cees
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 21:02 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html 
whitelist wish' :

Hallo David,

  Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
  before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
  everyone else.

DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now'  And as I've said
DC before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.

 yes please and I won't complain if they forgot all about html. grin

 But  seriously:  I  keep  running  into  things...  like, I just changed one
 account  to  IMAP.  My  choice, but...  I wanted to change the folder-order.
 That  USED to be possible with the combination of ALT+left mouse button, and
 then drag but now: nothing happens!
 Just  like  so  many other keycombo's don't work no more. Which I find quite
 annoying to be honest.
 Any thoughts on this matter?

-- 
regards,
 Cees

BACHELOR: A man who never makes the same mistake once.
__
The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha [A12F0392] running on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 
Service Pack 2



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0508-4, 27-02-2005
Tested on: 27-2-2005 21:06:16
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread David Calvarese
Leif Gregory wrote:
 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 13:15:41 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:15 AM where
 I live) you wrote:
 DC Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole? Gecko
 DC (From Firefox/Mozilla) would be a better idea.
 Immensely accurate observation.

None of us that want better HTML support and Remote Image support want
it to be just slapped in.  We expect RIT to do it in such a way that it
isn't a security hole.  Whether by limiting what tags are allowed,
blocking Java/Javascript/ActiveX, or some other means. Or possibly, and
preferably, all of the above.

-- 
Dave Calvarese
Member of E-mailaholics International
PGP Key Available at http://home.comcast.net/~dhcalva/DavidCalvarese-DH.asc


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello David,

  A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 21:02:53 GMT +0100

DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now'  And as I've said
DC before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.

 I know, and you are right, html should be available for those that want
 it. But can you see my point? Those of us that don't want it will be left
 with an unsupported version full of bugs.

 Fix all the bugs first, then implement html and at least the people who
 don't want the update will have at least a fully working client, including
 IMAP of course.


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


TB Hello Goncalo,

TB   A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB   27 February 2005 at 20:53:00 GMT +0100

GF ahahahahaha...

TB  You laugh all you want but I have a wife and family whom I love very much
TB  and I'm certainly not going to put them at risk for the sake of a html
TB  argument, I'd rather go back to using Outlook Express.


LoL!


-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Old soldiers never die, they just fade away..



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


DC Tony Boom wrote:
 Hello Leif,
  Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
  before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
  everyone else.

DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now'  And as I've said
DC before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.


I said it too. :)

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Windows: Just say NO!!!



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: moving folders

2005-02-27 Thread David Calvarese
Cees wrote:
  But  seriously:  I  keep  running  into  things...  like, I just changed one
  account  to  IMAP.  My  choice, but...  I wanted to change the folder-order.
  That  USED to be possible with the combination of ALT+left mouse button, and
  then drag but now: nothing happens!

I'm using Tbird at the moment because of the IMAP stuff... Though I
suppose I'll reinstall TB and give it's IMAP another shot...  Got
something I want to try with GnuPG with it anyway.

  Just  like  so  many other keycombo's don't work no more. Which I find quite
  annoying to be honest.
  Any thoughts on this matter?


Not sure, might be because you're using the Alpha build...  Speaking of
keys not working, my Ctrl-F isn't working in Firefox at the moment
either... .


-- 
Dave Calvarese
Member of E-mailaholics International
PGP Key Available at http://home.comcast.net/~dhcalva/DavidCalvarese-DH.asc


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: moving folders

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Cees,

  A reminder of what Cees on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 21:08:00 GMT +0100

C  yes please and I won't complain if they forgot all about html.

 To be fair Cees html is used a hell of a lot and all differences aside it
 should be available to those that want it.

 I would like to try IMAP like I said before so I'd like to at least see
 that fixed before they commit too many resources on html. That way those
 that don't want it can stick with this version. Those that do want it can
 start the whole process of pest control all over again.


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread David Calvarese
Tony Boom wrote:
 Hello David,
 
   A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
   27 February 2005 at 21:02:53 GMT +0100
 
 DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now'  And as I've said
 DC before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.
 
  I know, and you are right, html should be available for those that want
  it. But can you see my point? Those of us that don't want it will be left
  with an unsupported version full of bugs.
 
  Fix all the bugs first, then implement html and at least the people who
  don't want the update will have at least a fully working client, including
  IMAP of course.

Oh, I agree 100%.  I certainly want better IMAP support and for some
fixes to be made to the GnuPG (not PGP) support.  Those have to happen
before I can switch back, regardless of HTML support... If they do HTML
first, I'll still be using Tbird till they get the IMAP/GnuPG stuff done. :)

-- 
Dave Calvarese
Member of E-mailaholics International
PGP Key Available at http://home.comcast.net/~dhcalva/DavidCalvarese-DH.asc


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now' And as I've
DC said before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.

TB I know, and you are right, html should be available for those that
TB want  it. But can you see my point? Those of us that don't want it
TB will be left with an unsupported version full of bugs.

I can't understand why. Isn't the check box to enable/disable enough?


TB Fix  all  the  bugs  first,  then  implement html and at least the
TB people  who  don't  want  the  update  will  have at least a fully
TB working client, including IMAP of course.

?

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Je suis Marxiste, tendance Groucho!



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 21:18:50 GMT +0100

GF Old soldiers never die,

They just go on and on and on about the war :)

 


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


GF Old soldiers never die,

TB They just go on and on and on about the war :)

Hmmm... I better start signing my emails! :)


-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Blessed our young they will inherit our national debt.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 21:21:08 GMT +0100

GF I can't understand why. Isn't the check box to enable/disable enough?

 In an ideal world yes, but you tick the box for one message and forget to
 untick it, what happens then? Achilles and all his mates come charging in.

 How about a button on the header pane that works on a per message basis.
 It only appears if the message is html and requires images to be
 downloaded. You click it, the pretty pictures appear and then it defaults
 to off for the next message?


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread The Final Cut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Tony Boom

On Sunday, February 27, 2005, at 3:01:31 PM
You wrote:

TB You laugh all you want but I have a wife and family whom I love very much
TB  and I'm certainly not going to put them at risk for the sake of a html
TB  argument, I'd rather go back to using Outlook Express.


hahahaha I hope you are not serious!


- --
The Final Cut
Thebat: 3.0.2.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFCIjEFmZdOAsVmU04RAkOUAJ9Q4YcvwAx3FQfO3QplD1/EyF6R2ACbBEaj
o6cqMs+EFAe4wN5g5xbP5uY=
=2RJj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello David,

  A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 21:20:46 GMT +0100

DC Oh, I agree 100%.  I certainly want better IMAP support and for some
DC fixes to be made to the GnuPG (not PGP) support

 Not too long ago my host implemented IMAP. I've never used it before but
 would like to see what all the fuss is about. Trouble is if I try it
 with a half working IMAP client I'm afraid it'll put me off of it for
 life.

 Well you know me and PGP, we have never got along. I'm using version 6.5.8
 that Marck gave me years ago, it's working and I'm not changing it, even
 though I don't use it much.

 I do use GnuPG but that's under it's native environment, Linux and it
 seems to work OK there.
 
-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello The!

On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 2:43 PM, you wrote:

 hahahaha I hope you are not serious!

Oh, but he is! You just haven't been around long enough to know Leif
the way Tony does!!

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2







 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello The,

  A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 21:44:40 GMT +0100

TFC hahahaha I hope you are not serious!

 Do you see me laughing?

 Can you see his rouge image? That little boy he's just about to throw off
 the cliff? I'm not risking that for the sake of html!


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Mary,

  A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 21:51:08 GMT +0100

MB Oh, but he is! You just haven't been around long enough to know Leif
MB the way Tony does!!

 Best stay out of it Mary, you don't want to put yourself at risk.


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Goncalo Farias

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :


TB Hello The,

TB   A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBBETA typed on:
TB   27 February 2005 at 21:44:40 GMT +0100

TFC hahahaha I hope you are not serious!

TB  Do you see me laughing?

TB  Can you see his rouge image? That little boy he's just about to throw off
TB  the cliff? I'm not risking that for the sake of html!

ui ui ui estou a tremer cheio de medo! :)

-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

I got a kick for a dog beggin' for love.



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Mary,

  A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 21:51:08 GMT +0100

MB Oh, but he is! You just haven't been around long enough to know Leif
MB the way Tony does!!

 Tell you what Mary, Lief has been awfully quiet this past hour, hope he's
 not arranging anything.

 Now I really do think we should stop, there seems to be an overwhelming
 smell of trout in the air :)


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Goncalo,

  A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 22:06:20 GMT +0100

GF ui ui ui estou a tremer cheio de medo!

 Sorry, don't speak Klingon.


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Tony!

On Sunday, February 27, 2005, 3:05 PM, you wrote:

  Tell you what Mary, Lief has been awfully quiet this past hour, hope he's
  not arranging anything.

Tony, The Name! shivering Quick, fix it! Before he notices that you
misspelled The Name!!

  Now I really do think we should stop, there seems to be an overwhelming
  smell of trout in the air :)

The self-detonating kind, yes! and the sickening odor of Dead
Horse--an evil companion rides with him!

rushes to :toilet: 

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2







 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Cees
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 22:13 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html 
whitelist wish' :

Hallo Tony,
  
GF ui ui ui estou a tremer cheio de medo!
TB  Sorry, don't speak Klingon.

 whahahahahaa.. :-))

-- 
regards, 
 Cees

Coming soon: Windows for Nintendo!
__
The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha [A12F0392] running on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 
Service Pack 2



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0508-4, 27-02-2005
Tested on: 27-2-2005 22:17:52
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Mary,

  A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 22:15:59 GMT +0100

MB and the sickening odor of Dead Horse

 I know, and all that hassle of having to put clean bed linen on.


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: html whitelist wish

2005-02-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Mary,

  A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBBETA typed on:
  27 February 2005 at 22:15:59 GMT +0100

MB rushes to :toilet: 

 Can't stop :rofl2:


-- 
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
  
 :gentoo:
   www.gentoo.org




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

  1   2   >