Re: RH9's Apache 2 and Tomcat 4
My reasons: - source has the fixes first...critical on production servers, especially for security fixes. With source, you don't wait for Red Hat to release something. A lag of several days can mean the difference between weathering a storm and spending the weekend scrolling through logs and compiling forensic evidence for lawyers. The most recent OpenSSH fix is a perfect example of this...all of my Red Hat servers were patched by 9 AM the morning after the fix by building from source...it was several days before Red Hat got around to releasing the RPM for the same thing. - source means you don't fight with everyone else in the world to download the RPM when RH releases it on the Red Hat network. Many organizations have policies that prohibit installing RPMs from any other source...a corporate security officer would be nuts to let admins install RPMs with doubtful pedigrees. Imagine someone setting up a RPM mirror site that has the RPM you need, only its their special version. How would you know? Most people don't know how to check. - source means you put the files where you want them to be. Everyone has their own system, as does every company (or they should). With RPMs, the files go where the RPM maintainer wants to put them...this may or may not fit your environment...it rarely does on my systems. You can spend more time reconciling the differences (and dependencies) than you do just building from source. - source means you know EXACTLY what was done to your system, you are not relying on someone else...this is key if you are sleeping next to a pager every night. - source means you keep your installation tracking with the authoritative source. I spent almost an hour explaining to an auditor why my Apache's version numbers didn't match Red Hat's...the auditor felt that RH's version number was the safest version number and that any later versions released by Apache.org were beta. His port scanner found a later version number and kicked out a red flag. I don't have an hour to hold someone's hand. RPMs are great. I use them for things I don't really want to spend the time to learn inside and out, like GNOME or whatever, typically desktop-level packages. Package maintenance systems are necessary for any environment with a multitude of systems. However, when it comes to publicly accessible web services (Apache, BIND, MTAs, etc), I build from source. Its not right or wrong, its just right for me. I think I got spoiled after administering a slew of *BSD systems for a couple of years...the ports tree is the shiznit. John Mike Millson wrote: I have not had any problems integrating tomcat w/ RH9 and Apache 2. Here is my write up on how to do this: http://www.meritonlinesystems.com/docs/apache_tomcat_redhat.html Granted, I'm not using mod_jk2, so maybe that is why I had no trouble. I have always heard it's better to compile Apache from source vs. using the rpms, but no one has ever quantified the advantages to doing this. Until someone does, and the advantages of compiling from source outweigh the advantages I've listed below for using the rpms, I still recommend using the rpms. There must be advantages to compiling Apache from source. Anyone want to be the advocate for this and explain why/when to compile from source? Thank you, Mike On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 12:09, Chong Yu Meng wrote: Hi Mike ! I guess the best way to test my theory is to try integrating Tomcat with Apache 2 yourself. There are real benefits for using RH's rpms, but if the integration takes too much effort, it may not be worth it. I haven't touched Tomcat for about 4 months now, but when I was working on my document for integrating Tomcat and Apache way back in May, I remember having considerable trouble with RH9's Apache 2, which led me to use Falsehope's rpms instead. Regards, pascal chong Mike Millson wrote: There are two compelling benefits to installing the RedHat rpms: 1) Updates and bug fixes can be installed automatically from the Red Hat Network (https://rhn.redhat.com/). 2) Startup and shutdown scripts are already configured and available. I would like to weigh these benefits against any specific disadvantages to using the RedHat rpms. I know, this is a tomcat list, but I think it's relevant. Thank you, Mike On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 10:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using RH9 with the Apache2 that comes with it. Recently I've installed Tomcat5 with mod_jk2 without too many problems (jakarta-tomcat-5.0.7.tar.gz and mod_jk2-ap20-2.0.1-1jpp.i386.rpm). Proper configuration of workers2.properties and jk2.properties is essential I believe. I got a few sites running as virtual hosts on Apache2 as well as on Tomcat5 and everything seems to be fine so far. http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-5/v5.0.7-alpha/bin/ http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/v2.0.1/rpms/ -
[ANN] Updated Apache + Tomcat RH HOWTO
Apache 2 HTTP + Tomcat + JK. Updated with the most recent JK source version, 1.2.5. http://localhost/johnturner/howto/apache2-tomcat4127-jk-rh9-howto.html Virtual hosting HOWTO coming soon. Comments and suggestions welcome. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat and virtual hosts
Host name=www.site1.com appBase=/export/home/webroot/site1 Context path= docBase=/export/home/webroot/site1/ROOT /Context /Host Better yet, make the Context docBase = ROOT so it is relative to the Host's appBase. Put JSP in /export/home/webroot/site1/ROOT. Put WEB-INF in the same location. Do the same for site 2. John Johan Louwers wrote: I have set up tomcat and apache... bind them with a JK2 connector both on port 80. I have 2 domains running on the machine. I made the virtual hosts work in apache with editting httpd.conf The apache docs are located on the following location: /export/home/webroot/site1 (www.site1.com) /export/home/webroot/site2 (www.site2.com) I would like to access jsp files on both the website's like www.site1.com/index.jsp and www.site2.com/index.jsp and store the jsp files at the same location as the html docs. This means locate them in /export/home/webroot/site1 and /export/home/webroot/site2 How do I make tomcat understeand that it must be running jsp files on this locations. Anybody knows how to do this? You have to add some things to server.xml i know that buth what and do have to edit httpd.conf in some way to make this work? A working example of a server.xml/httpd.conf file is welcome and also any tip hint and clue :-) Thanks already, Johan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new build of isapi_redirector2.dll
Thanks! John David Boyer wrote: The current Jakarta release version is 2.0.2 which is from Fall 2002. If anyone is interested in trying something newer, I've posted a build on my web site: http://web.bvu.edu/staff/david/tcservcfg/isapi_redirector2.zip This based on the Tomcat 4.1.27 source code with the current Apache httpd PCRE and APR source. I have no environment in which to test this, so I make no guarantees about if it work, etc., but it did compile without any warnings. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat connector for Apache 2.0.47 ... Please Help
20 pages? What else is in there besides connector configuration? Just curious John Bhaskar Marthi wrote: dean, As said by lot of members, it would be great if you can post your document in the mailing list. BTW, did anyone try resin? How does it compare to tomcat? Thanks, Bhaskar The information contained in this communication may be confidential or legally privileged and is intended only for the recipient named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately advise the sender and delete the original and any copies from your computer system. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (Apache Tomcat) || (Tomcat with CGI Support)?
I've never tried it, but change the path to c:\progra~1. John Lawence wrote: Dear All, I need to accomondate some old cgi scripts on my website but primarily it uses java. I am wondering which comb is better in terms of simplicity and usability. By the way, I tried to enable CGI support with Tomcat, but since the installation path of Tomcat contains white space, it complaind that c:\programs does not exist (actually it is c:\program files). Anybody had the same experience? Charlie - Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Realizing a search functionality
AFAIK, Lucene indexes files. How then, do you index a dynamic site? The only files that exist on a dynamic site are source code files. Servlets would never be indexed...how then do you index the content returned from the servlet? Can Lucene do this? The Lucene site is pretty sparse in information. Not having worked with it, and not knowing every option available when using it, I think there might be some other alternatives. I've used Verity in the past, but that is a commercial product. The other tool I've used in the past to great success is Atomz (http://www.atomz.com). The trial is never-ending, so an index of up to 500 pages is free. Pages also = URL. The nice thing about Atomz is that it will spider your site and index the content returned, thus it works quite well for dynamic sites. In other words, it will take a URL like http://your.domain.com/content.jsp?id=512view=full; and index the content returned from that, not the actual text string of the URL. The only requirement is that you display the Atomz logo on the search results page. You can pay a small annual fee to have that removed. All indexes and collections are kept on the Atomz site, not yours, and you can define the stylesheet and template that is used to display the search results, as well as define the frequency of indexing. John Schalk wrote: Marco You may to have a look at Lucene (OpenSource Jakarata project) at: http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/index.html Kind Regards Schalk Neethling Volume4.Development.Multimedia.Branding emotionalize.conceptualize.visualize.realize Tel: +27125468436 Fax: +27125468436 email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.volume4.co.za :: -Original Message- :: From: Marco Tedone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:32 AM :: To: Tomcat Users List :: Subject: [OT] Realizing a search functionality :: :: Hi, I must admit that I don't know anything about how to realize a search :: functionality. The only thing that I know is that most sites have a search :: functionality which, when searching for something, return a list of links :: more or less involved in the search string. :: :: The only things I know are: :: :: 1) An index of the web site contents should be created somehow :: 2) The search 'action' (I'm talking in Struts terms, but I think it could be :: anything) should interact with this index to match the required string :: 3) A list (which form does it assume) containing all the links related to :: the query string should be created, eventually read and displayed to the :: client :: :: Did anyone of you realized succesfully a search functionality in its site? :: Could you please address me towards some good software (possibly :: open-source, possibly Jakarta, possibly java-oriented) and patterns to use :: to realize a search functionality? :: :: Many thanks, :: :: Marco :: :: :: :: :: - :: To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache Tomcat Performance Handbook
That's why...they're no longer being printed. Anything you see on shelves or in stores is backstock. Peer Information Services, which owned Wrox and several other publishing houses (like Friends of Ed) liquidated in March, 2003. Apress and Wiley picked up most of the assetsthe books that will be supported will be reprinted using Apress and Wiley covers and get a new ISBN. A perfect example of this is Beginning Java Objects by Jacquie Barker...it was a very popular Wrox book, it is now available as an Apress book with a different cover, different typesetting, different editorial team, etc. The content is the same, and the copyright is still 2000. Soif you see a Wrox book at full price, you can probably deal with the seller to get a discount if one isn't already offered. The sad thing is, the authors will never see any of that money, so if you really want to support the authors and encourage similar titles, buy the Apress or Wiley version instead. John Darryl L. Pierce wrote: John Turner wrote: The book was never published. The original publisher (Wrox) went out of business and liquidated assets. Was this recently? Just this past weekend I picked up a Wrox press book (Java Data) and it was 50% off. All of their books at Borders were 50% off. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Memory leaks?
Tim Funk wrote: The JDBC spec states that when a connection is closed, all dependent assets should also be closed. So if you are using a pool, make sure your pool is compliant since the connection is never closed until the pool closes it. So, that means that if you have a pool of ten connections, and you use each of those ten connections ten times with 2 ResultSets, you have 200 ResultSets sitting in memory, assuming you don't close them yourself? John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Realizing a search functionality
Thanks for the clarification. John Tim Funk wrote: Lucene indexes documents. A document is composed of fields and does not need (and it actuually is not) to be a physical file. In the simplistic example of a site consisting of a single dynamic web page backed by a database. You would create documents based on the database data where the db data goes into named fields. Then when you construct your query, it will return a list of documents. When you iterate through each document, you need to pull the appropriate field out of the document to reconstruct the appropriate URL. In a nutshell, it can do what you want, but there is a lot of setup work to construct documents and a lot of work to display results from documents from queries. -Tim John Turner wrote: AFAIK, Lucene indexes files. How then, do you index a dynamic site? The only files that exist on a dynamic site are source code files. Servlets would never be indexed...how then do you index the content returned from the servlet? Can Lucene do this? The Lucene site is pretty sparse in information. Not having worked with it, and not knowing every option available when using it, I think there might be some other alternatives. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Realizing a search functionality
Ulrich Mayring wrote: Lucene is not a search engine, but an API for writing a search engine, so it can do everything that you can write in Java. By itself it does nothing, like the JDK. Thanks for the clarification. I can only recommend Lucene, it is vastly superior to any pre-packaged search engine, because you do not depend on specific features or behavior, but can customize everything to your needs. Assuming you have time, money, skills, etc. to do so, which is not always the case. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Realizing a search functionality
Ulrich Mayring wrote: John Turner wrote: Ulrich Mayring wrote: I can only recommend Lucene, it is vastly superior to any pre-packaged search engine, because you do not depend on specific features or behavior, but can customize everything to your needs. Assuming you have time, money, skills, etc. to do so, which is not always the case. Skills is the key issue. It took me all of one week to write our own custom search engine and I doubt that anyone would be able to install and configure a third-party product any faster than that. I had no prior exposure to Lucene, but of course knew my way around Java. Hmmm...I had Atomz working for several clients by lunch one day. ;) I'm not arguing, just emphasizing that some of us are not Java developers. Granted, the question was somewhat in a context of using Java and not using Tomcat, but not every Tomcat user is a developer. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion
I always use openssl myself, but from the sound of this thread, it sure sounds like it is desperately needed! Thanks! John Lawrence, Gabriel wrote: I'm working on a tool to pull out the private key. It should be done by the end of the day. I will send something to the list when I have it finished. Kind of funny how just as I'm getting around to a project that has been on my plate all week someone else needs it too ;-) -gabe -Original Message- From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion I realize you can't do this with keytool. Is there no way to do it at all? I'm beginning to think I might be totally hosed here. Thanks, Dave -Original Message- From: Jay Garala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:37 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion NOTE: You cannot export private key from keystore. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat startup failure
Sounds to me like a permissions/environment problem. For example, starting Tomcat as root manually, but then the script tries to start tomcat as some non-root user. If Tomcat starts as root, log files are owned by root and non-root users cannot write to them. It should throw an error somewhere, though maybe its getting swallowed by a redirect to /dev/null or something. I would verify the script and doublecheck that the script environment (variables, user account, etc) matches exactly with the way you start Tomcat manually. John Noel Rappin wrote: I have a set up where tomcat is supposed to start on boot via an rc shell script on a Linux system (tomcat 4.1.18). I have this intermittent failure mode where tomcat fails to start up on reboot. I can _always_ trigger this failure by deleting all tomcat log files, and then rebooting. After the reboot, the only thing in the log directory is a zero-length catalina.out file, and the java process is not running. Invoking the tomcat startup again at this point causes it to work normally. I can find no evidence that the tomcat java process exits, and no matter how much I turn up debugging, I get no logged output. Is there any possible mechanism that could be causing this failure, or at least some place or some way I could get better debugging information? Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 book
Yes. I know for sure one is due early Q1 2004. It is being written from scratch for Tomcat 5, it will not be a Tomcat 4 book refreshed or tweaked to support Tomcat 5. John Marco Tedone wrote: Hi, is there in prevision any book about Tomcat 5? Marco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat grabbing all requests from Apache
Can't do anything without your config files. Help us help you. John Patrick Zeiler wrote: Hi list, I am having slight problems with configuring tomcat to work with apache. Used Versions: Apache/2.0.47 + mod_jk2 + Tomcat/4.1.27 The configured contexts work fine and as supposed. The problem I have is that Tomcat grabs all requests that are going to the server. Example: http://192.168.1.17/ results in: The server encountered an internal error (No Context configured to process this request) that prevented it from fulfilling this request. In my workers2.properties is no uri like [uri:/*] defined, so i don't get it why Tomcat gets the request at all. Apache should just list the directory index in that situation. I need to run a mixed environment of static (.html) directories, .php and .jsp applications. Any ideas would be appreciated... Regards, Patrick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache/Tomcat Appbase
As long as you protect your WEB-INF and META-INF directories with the appropriate Apache directives, and your connector mapping is correct, and you don't use the Invoker servlet, you're good to go. All of my virtual hosts have the Apache DocumentRoot setup that way. John Chad Arimura wrote: I'm new to tomcat so this question might not make sense. Is it a security risk (or a bad practice) to make the appbase of both apache httpd and Tomcat the same? To me, it seems logical because then I can serve .jsp files through Tomcat, and all other content through httpd without having to put these contents in different directories... (eg /var/www/myApp and /usr/tomcat/myApp). I'm using Tomcat 4.1, Apache 2, and jk2. Thanks, Chad Arimura AllDorm Inc. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache Tomcat Performance Handbook
The book was never published. The original publisher (Wrox) went out of business and liquidated assets. The rights to the performance handbook (and many other former Wrox titles including the security handbook) were picked up by Apress. The rights to the rest were picked up by Wiley. I think Wiley is running wrox.com right now. From the conversations I've had with Apress, the future of the performance book is undecided, though that could change at any moment. I for one think there is a need for such a book, but with Tomcat 5 coming out, it might need to be rewritten to address the new release. John Flat Juas wrote: Hi! I'm looking for the Apache Tomcat Performance Handbook, but in every shop I check it's out of print. There are no used copies in ebay neither. Where can I get a copy of this book (I don't mind if it's a used one) or buy a pdf version of it ? Can you recommend me other books about tomcat performance or guide me to online resources about this subject ? Thanks in advance __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 book
The one I know about, no. Its possible O'Reilly has one in the works, but I don't know anything about it. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: O'Reilly ? John Turner wrote: Yes. I know for sure one is due early Q1 2004. It is being written from scratch for Tomcat 5, it will not be a Tomcat 4 book refreshed or tweaked to support Tomcat 5. John Marco Tedone wrote: Hi, is there in prevision any book about Tomcat 5? Marco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache Tomcat Performance Handbook
Well, I guess we have to be more clear. Wrox did not go out of business. Peer Information Services did. Wrox was just one of many names that Peer used to publish materials. So, while there were lots of titles and lots of great Wrox books, that is separate from whether the company called Peer Information Services was managed efficiently and wisely. I'm no MBA, but if I were to call it, I would say it was a simple matter of too big, too many, too fast. They had offices in three countries (England, India, and US), lots of people, and lots of hurry up and wait. The overhead of managing all those titles had to be huge, and I can tell you from firsthand experience that every book probably had 30 or 40 people involved (counting the authors) in getting it to press. For example, my contract was FedEx'd back and forth to India twice. Not a lot of money, but 3-6 authors per title and several hundred titles and it starts to add up. Even something as niche-oriented as the security handbook I worked on had 18 people and 5 authors for about 225 pages. Without going into specifics, I can also say that Peer's royalty schedule was pretty poor in comparison to other publishers, so in that light they should have had more money to work with than one of the other companies, but apparently that didn't make a difference. John Matt Fury wrote: How could Wrox go out of business? That doesn't sound right. They have 1001 titles and write great books! Are you sure? --- John Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The book was never published. The original publisher (Wrox) went out of business and liquidated assets. The rights to the performance handbook (and many other former Wrox titles including the security handbook) were picked up by Apress. The rights to the rest were picked up by Wiley. I think Wiley is running wrox.com right now. From the conversations I've had with Apress, the future of the performance book is undecided, though that could change at any moment. I for one think there is a need for such a book, but with Tomcat 5 coming out, it might need to be rewritten to address the new release. John Flat Juas wrote: Hi! I'm looking for the Apache Tomcat Performance Handbook, but in every shop I check it's out of print. There are no used copies in ebay neither. Where can I get a copy of this book (I don't mind if it's a used one) or buy a pdf version of it ? Can you recommend me other books about tomcat performance or guide me to online resources about this subject ? Thanks in advance __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache Tomcat Performance Handbook
Also, while the Wrox side of the business seemed to be thriving, there were several other publishing arms that may not have been doing much more than soaking up profits with little return. As I said, Wrox was just one of many publishing names used by Peer. John John Turner wrote: Well, I guess we have to be more clear. Wrox did not go out of business. Peer Information Services did. Wrox was just one of many names that Peer used to publish materials. So, while there were lots of titles and lots of great Wrox books, that is separate from whether the company called Peer Information Services was managed efficiently and wisely. I'm no MBA, but if I were to call it, I would say it was a simple matter of too big, too many, too fast. They had offices in three countries (England, India, and US), lots of people, and lots of hurry up and wait. The overhead of managing all those titles had to be huge, and I can tell you from firsthand experience that every book probably had 30 or 40 people involved (counting the authors) in getting it to press. For example, my contract was FedEx'd back and forth to India twice. Not a lot of money, but 3-6 authors per title and several hundred titles and it starts to add up. Even something as niche-oriented as the security handbook I worked on had 18 people and 5 authors for about 225 pages. Without going into specifics, I can also say that Peer's royalty schedule was pretty poor in comparison to other publishers, so in that light they should have had more money to work with than one of the other companies, but apparently that didn't make a difference. John Matt Fury wrote: How could Wrox go out of business? That doesn't sound right. They have 1001 titles and write great books! Are you sure? --- John Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The book was never published. The original publisher (Wrox) went out of business and liquidated assets. The rights to the performance handbook (and many other former Wrox titles including the security handbook) were picked up by Apress. The rights to the rest were picked up by Wiley. I think Wiley is running wrox.com right now. From the conversations I've had with Apress, the future of the performance book is undecided, though that could change at any moment. I for one think there is a need for such a book, but with Tomcat 5 coming out, it might need to be rewritten to address the new release. John Flat Juas wrote: Hi! I'm looking for the Apache Tomcat Performance Handbook, but in every shop I check it's out of print. There are no used copies in ebay neither. Where can I get a copy of this book (I don't mind if it's a used one) or buy a pdf version of it ? Can you recommend me other books about tomcat performance or guide me to online resources about this subject ? Thanks in advance __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compilation of mod_jk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am using Apache 1.3.19 with Tomcat 4.1.24 I need to do a 64 bit compilation of mod_jk . I tried to do a 32 bit compilation but there were some problems in the Makefile. What problems? I need to know following things. 1. Where to get the source code for mod_jk. http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ 2. Detailed compilation procedures. Not sure I can help other than to suggest that you be more specific. What OS, etc. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Urgent - strange tomcat /mod jk (?) problem going on
If http://your.url:8080/yourApp doesn't work, you have to fix Tomcat first (server.xml). If http://your.url/yourApp doesn't work and http://your.url:8080/yourApp does work, you have to fix mod_jk (or rather the JK settings in Apache's httpd.conf). HTH John Denise Mangano wrote: Ok I'm a dope - sorry. I didn't realize that I had changed my ServerName in my apache httpd.conf and forgot to change it in my server.xml . However, now I am getting a bad request error. I am no longer getting the HTTP 404 resource not available error. I'm not really sure if that means Tomcat is working or not though... Both mod_jk.log and catalina.out look normal. My apache logs don't say anything about the request... The strangest thing is that I have all my logging set to debug, but there is nothing showing in my apache log. They don't say much of anything besides my server starting and stopping... Thanks. -Original Message- From: Denise Mangano Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:00 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Urgent - strange tomcat /mod jk (?) problem going on I have a major problem and I am hoping you can help. I have a web app which serves the first few pages through apache, then the last 4 secure pages through tomcat. This was all working at one point, but I've had to rebuild since - and I'm experiencing some new problems. I have apache 1.3.28, Tomcat 4.1.27, mod_jk 1.3. My apache part of the site works fine. It appears that Tomcat (and possibly mod_jk) are working. 1. When I go to www.mysite.com:8080 I get a page cannot be displayed 2. Anytime I try to go to www.mysite.com/index.jsp or any other Tomcat page I get HTTP Status 404 - The requested resource (/CCPayments/7D/CCPayment.jsp) is not available. Also, there is no mention of this request in the apache error logs to indicate that the server is attempting to serve that page through Apache. Mod_jk finds the match for /CCPayments/ but doesn't do anything with it. This is the output in mod_jk.log: [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]: Attempting to map URI '/CCPayments/7D/CCPayment.jsp' [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (502)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a context match ajp13 - /CCPayments/ [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into wc_get_worker_for_name ajp13 [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name, done found a worker [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1404)]: Into jk_worker_t::get_endpoint [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1448)]: In jk_endpoint_t::ajp_get_endpoint, time elapsed since last request = 31 seconds [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1116)]: Into jk_endpoint_t::service [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (295)]: Into ajp_marshal_into_msgb [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (432)]: ajp_marshal_into_msgb - Done [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (642)]: sending to ajp13 #674 [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (884)]: ajp_send_request 2: request body to send 0 - request body to resend 0 [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (729)]: received from ajp13 #109 [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (483)]: ajp_unmarshal_response: status = 404 [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (488)]: ajp_unmarshal_response: Number of headers is = 2 [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (532)]: ajp_unmarshal_response: Header[0] [Content-Type] = [text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1] [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (532)]: ajp_unmarshal_response: Header[1] [Content-Language] = [en-US] [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (729)]: received from ajp13 #753 [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (729)]: received from ajp13 #2 [Thu Sep 04 12:26:04 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1382)]: Into jk_endpoint_t::done, recycling connection Any clue what else to check for? I guess it seems that mod_jk is doing its thing like its supposed to but Tomcat isn't working, but I won't know for sure until I at least get Tomcat working. Also - I started Tomcat first and waited a whole minute before starting Apache. Thanks, Denise Mangano - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [SOLVED] Urgent - strange tomcat /mod jk (?) problem going on
Glad I could help. Relaxing is good advice. ;) Have fun! John Denise Mangano wrote: There were a few things going on there... I should have taken a step back and relaxed and given everything another look before I posted... My apologies for that ... I panicked because of the bind that I am in. 1. ServerName httpd/conf did not match the value of the name attribute in the Host Element of server.xml 2. Was trying to access a jsp page through http:// when I only set up the JkMount for https:// 3. Somehow when I restored my application files, one of the directories got copied over as 7d instead of 7D and the application was looking for the latter. Everything is actually all good, and running fine. Surprisingly enough mod_jk worked without a hitch (unlike last time when it took me two weeks to get it working). This time I followed your how-to pretty much to a T... Thanks for having that available!! Denise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and multiple processors
Matt Raible wrote: 1. Does it support multiple processors? We have a Tomcat instance in production on a NT box with 4 processors, but Tomcat only seems to use one. Does the 1.4.2 JVM support MP? Yes, at least on Sun hardware with Solaris 8, and Intel hardware with RH Linux 7.x (duals only...we don't have quads). Don't know about Windows. 2. We have IIS on the front end, and we are currently not able to migrate to Apache. We'd like to use the connectors (jk or jk2) to do load-balancing and failover. Do these connectors provide the support we need? Should be use a clustering architecture like JavaSpaces (http://www.onjava.com/lpt/a/2422) instead? The connectors can load balance, but unfortunately the IIS versions are sort of a crapshoot in my mind. 3. We plan on deploying 42+ applications to a number of Tomcat servers. Since each application will support 1 customer - I think it's a good idea to have 1 app - 1 tomcat - so if Tomcat crashes, it only affects that customer - rather than all customers. I've heard of setting up a CATALINA_BASE to share Tomcat's core files, and then setup webapps directories for each customer. Does this sound reasonable? Have have others done something like this? I agree with Yoav. All the way back with Tomcat 3.1 we had ours setup this way: 1 virtual host = 1 Tomcat instance = 1 VM = 1 application We've had a couple dozen set up like this for a long time, works like a charm. I prefer this over using CATALINA_BASE, as I can treat each virtual host separately from any other, including giving each different JVM memory settings, etc. Admittedly, we're an ASP, so we can dictate how many web apps go with each virtual host, but I would think having completely separate Tomcat instances would make sense in most real production environments. The only thing you lose with multiple Tomcat instances is disk space, and disk is cheap. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Problem with a page redirecting to a non-existent page
Funky. Glad you got it solved! John Norris Shelton wrote: We figured out the problem. He was working on a problem where deployed .jsp files were not being picked up. He removed all the work files and restarted tomcat from that directory. The script that we use (why, because IT wrote it and says we have to use it) includes . in the classpath. Hence, his work files were available to everyone. Luckily most of his URLs were unique to his (imagine if he had a normal /index.jsp). --- Norris Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, great. It gets even more interesting. One of my coworkers has a problem with her search.jsp in another context and we just found that another coworder has a search.jsp and a dis_timeout.jsp. Each of the contexts is defined within their own service. How can one context affect another? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can not get SSL Client Certificate
First thing I would try is putting your LoadModule line ABOVE every line that uses Jk*, such as: JkExtractSSL On JkHTTPSIndicator HTTPS JkSESSIONIndicator SSL_SESSION_ID JkCIPHERIndicator SSL_CIPHER JkCERTSIndicator SSL_CLIENT_CERT As positioned in your post, the lines shown above would have no effect if Jk wasn't loaded until later. John Elif Akten wrote: Hi, I have been trying to get SSL client certificate during a client authenticated SSL session. I am using Apache 2.0 with Tomcat 4.1.27. Everything works succesfully: when I want to open a SSL protected JSP page my browser asks for my client certificate and verifies it. But when I try to get client certificate using request.getHeader(SSL_CLIENT_CERT) it returns null. Also request.getAuthType() and request.getUserPrincipal() return null value. Following is the relevant part from our httpd.conf file: VirtualHost dune.net:443 SSLEngine On SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXP56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL SSLCertificateFile conf/ssl/server.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile conf/ssl/server.key JkExtractSSL On JkHTTPSIndicator HTTPS JkSESSIONIndicator SSL_SESSION_ID JkCIPHERIndicator SSL_CIPHER JkCERTSIndicator SSL_CLIENT_CERT /VirtualHost SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 2 SSLCACertificateFile C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/conf/ssl/ca.cer SSLCACertificatePath C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/conf/ssl SSLCACertificateFile C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/conf/ssl/rootca.cer IfModule !mod_jk.c LoadModule jk_module C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/modules/mod_jk.dll /IfModule JkWorkersFile C:/Program Files/Apache Tomcat 4.0/conf/workers.properties JkLogFile C:/Program Files/Apache Tomcat 4.0/logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLevel info JkMount /examples/* ajp13 Also our ssl.conf file includes the following lines : SSLOptions +StdEnvVars +ExportCertData JkOptions +ForwardKeySize +ForwardURICompat +ForwardDirectories JkMount /demo/* ajp13 JkExtractSSL On JkEnvVar SSL_CLIENT_CERT UNSET What should I do to read the client certificate? Any help is welcome... _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to get tomcat to autostart on linux
Courtesy of Oscar Carrillo: http://daydream.stanford.edu/tomcat/install_web_services.html#daemons You need to download his tomcatd script, and copy it to /etc/rc.d/init.d. Then execute: /sbin/chkconfig --del tomcatd Then execute: /sbin/chkconfig --add tomcatd Note you will need to modify the tomcatd script to meet your needs, such as changing the paths, etc. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, I need to know how to get tomcat to autostart on a redhat linux 8 box - can anyone tell me? Thanks, Bobbie Bobbie Atristain Internet Systems Administrator Media General, INC. 804.649.6156 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't stop tomcat with shutdown.bat - bug 17193
Jon Skeet wrote: I think a jk2 release (v1.2.5 I believe) is very close, and has this bug fixed. That's excellent news. When it's released, will I be able to just dump a new tomcat-jk2.jar in server/lib, and everything should spring to life, or is there more to it than that? The release that Yoav is referencing is a new mod_jk, which is an Apache DSO module, not a JAR file. So yes, I guess you will be able to sub in the new DSO as soon as you can build one or find a binary, but don't confuse it with a JAR file. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which is the best way to install an application with connection p ooling
If you are using a WAR file, put your entire Context block into a file called (your-webapp).xml and stick it in META-INF. Whatever is legal in a Context block in server.xml is also legal there. Then you can deploy the WAR file using the manager app froma remote system. The admin and manager apps themselves do the same thing, check out admin.xml etc in the default distribution. John Kevin Passey wrote: John, I can easily deploy a basic app using the manager. But when it comes to deploying something that needs additional Context information I come un-stuck. I basically have an app that I want to connect to an AS/400 database using connection pooling. The only way I can get it to work is to manually insert the entries in the server XML file and then re-start. Any other pointer greatly appreciated. Regards Kevin -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 September 2003 13:45 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Which is the best way to install an application with connection p ooling There are a number of ways. If autoDeploy = true then you can just drop the WAR file in the Host's appBase directory. You can also use the manager app's various tasks (install, deploy, etc): http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/manager-howto.html This is easily accomplished with ant. John Kevin Passey wrote: I have normally stopped the server - edited the server XML file, put my war file in the webapps folder and re-started tomcat. Using the manager app - is there a way I can do this 1)from a remote system and 2)without manually editing the server XML file. I've have tried putting the jndi info using the admin console but I keep getting NULL driver exceptions. Thanks Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configuring jk2 for Apache 4.0.23/TomCat 4.0.27
You don't have a shared memory file configured in your properties files, or if you do, it isn't accessible or writable. John Raj Dasgupta wrote: After adding jk2 to my apache's httpd.conf, I see these errors on startup. Any ideas on what this error indicates? [Wed Sep 03 10:35:32 2003] [error] shm.init(): No file [Wed Sep 03 10:35:32 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 -2 [Wed Sep 03 10:35:32 2003] [notice] Apache/2.0.43 (Unix) mod_jk2/2.0.2 configured -- resuming normal operations [Wed Sep 03 10:35:32 2003] [error] shm.init(): No file [Wed Sep 03 10:35:32 2003] [error] shm.init(): No file [Wed Sep 03 10:38:38 2003] [error] jk2_init() Can't find child 27367 in scoreboard [Wed Sep 03 10:38:38 2003] [error] shm.init(): No file [Wed Sep 03 10:38:38 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 -2 [Wed Sep 03 10:57:18 2003] [error] shm.init(): No file [Wed Sep 03 10:57:19 2003] [error] jk2_init() Can't find child 27482 in scoreboard [Wed Sep 03 10:57:19 2003] [error] shm.init(): No file [Wed Sep 03 10:57:19 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 -2 [Wed Sep 03 10:57:19 2003] [error] jk2_init() Can't find child 27483 in scoreboard [Wed Sep 03 10:57:19 2003] [error] shm.init(): No file [Wed Sep 03 10:57:19 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 -2 Thanks Raj - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with my first webapp
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/hello.jsp $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/classes $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/lib $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/web.xml hello.jsp: % String myVar = new String(Hello World); out.println(div align=centerh2 + myVar = /h2/div); % http://localhost/myApp/hello.jsp Post back when you are ready for servlets. John Damien wrote: Can somebody provides me a complete tree with a simple application to start working on ? I think it would be a good idea if somebody 'tar/gzip' the directory strutcure found in this page : http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/appdev/sample/ so a beginner is able to start with a clean project. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with my first webapp
oops, that should be: out.println(div align='center'h2 + myVar = /h2/div); My bad. John John Turner wrote: $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/hello.jsp $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/classes $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/lib $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/web.xml hello.jsp: % String myVar = new String(Hello World); out.println(div align=centerh2 + myVar = /h2/div); % http://localhost/myApp/hello.jsp Post back when you are ready for servlets. John Damien wrote: Can somebody provides me a complete tree with a simple application to start working on ? I think it would be a good idea if somebody 'tar/gzip' the directory strutcure found in this page : http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/appdev/sample/ so a beginner is able to start with a clean project. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't stop tomcat with shutdown.bat - bug 17193
I defer to Yoav, as it is entirely possible (though not probable) that I am on crack. But the thread referenced is most definitely talking about mod_jk. John Jon Skeet wrote: The release that Yoav is referencing is a new mod_jk, which is an Apache DSO module, not a JAR file. So yes, I guess you will be able to sub in the new DSO as soon as you can build one or find a binary, but don't confuse it with a JAR file. In that case I can't see how it's going to help - I'm not running under apache, I'm running a standalone Tomcat, which can't shut itself down... Jon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any Recommended Java/Servlet Books
Archives, this has come up before. John Jim Si wrote: Hello Everyone, Could anyone tell me some good reference books related to java servlets? In addition, any java books related to the Multimedia like showing pictures, playing videos and etc. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: adding a servlet to my webapp
You have to map your servlet in web.xml. FAQ: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/misc.html#invoker John Jason Jesso wrote: When I go to my servlet I get HTTP Status 404 - /jasonTest/servlet/foo/HelloWorld The url is: http://neptune/jasonTest/servlet/foo/HelloWorld My config is as follows: (What is wrong here??) I have a webapp defined in server.xml as === Context path=/jasonTest docBase=jasonTest debug=0 reloadable=true crossContext=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=jasonTest suffix=.out/ /Context === My webapp directory structure looks like: === neptune:root ls -lR jasonTest/ total 16 drwxr-sr-x 4 root software512 Sep 03 10:18 WEB-INF -rw-r--r-- 1 root software 43 Sep 03 10:10 index.html jasonTest/WEB-INF: total 24 drwxr-sr-x 3 root software512 Sep 03 11:12 classes drwxr-sr-x 2 root software512 Sep 03 10:09 lib -rw-r--r-- 1 root software328 Sep 03 14:22 web.xml jasonTest/WEB-INF/classes: total 8 drwxr-sr-x 2 root software512 Sep 03 10:31 foo jasonTest/WEB-INF/classes/foo: total 8 -rw-r- 1 root software815 Sep 03 10:31 HelloWorld.class jasonTest/WEB-INF/lib: total 0 neptune:root === My web.xml looks like: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? !DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd; web-app servlet servlet-nameHelloWorld/servlet-name servlet-class/servlet/foo/HelloWorld/servlet-class /servlet /web-app - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: adding a servlet to my webapp
Yes, exactly. The way you have it now is trying to use the Invoker servlet. You are missing the servlet mapping in web.xml, as explained in option #3 of this post which is linked from the FAQ section: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-userm=103945394724196w=2 John Jason Jesso wrote: But, I don't want to use the invoker. I want to be able to specify the servlet itself in web.xml. The invoker is evil according to the link you gave me. John Turner wrote: You have to map your servlet in web.xml. FAQ: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/misc.html#invoker John Jason Jesso wrote: When I go to my servlet I get HTTP Status 404 - /jasonTest/servlet/foo/HelloWorld The url is: http://neptune/jasonTest/servlet/foo/HelloWorld My config is as follows: (What is wrong here??) I have a webapp defined in server.xml as === Context path=/jasonTest docBase=jasonTest debug=0 reloadable=true crossContext=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=jasonTest suffix=.out/ /Context === My webapp directory structure looks like: === neptune:root ls -lR jasonTest/ total 16 drwxr-sr-x 4 root software512 Sep 03 10:18 WEB-INF -rw-r--r-- 1 root software 43 Sep 03 10:10 index.html jasonTest/WEB-INF: total 24 drwxr-sr-x 3 root software512 Sep 03 11:12 classes drwxr-sr-x 2 root software512 Sep 03 10:09 lib -rw-r--r-- 1 root software328 Sep 03 14:22 web.xml jasonTest/WEB-INF/classes: total 8 drwxr-sr-x 2 root software512 Sep 03 10:31 foo jasonTest/WEB-INF/classes/foo: total 8 -rw-r- 1 root software815 Sep 03 10:31 HelloWorld.class jasonTest/WEB-INF/lib: total 0 neptune:root === My web.xml looks like: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? !DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd; web-app servlet servlet-nameHelloWorld/servlet-name servlet-class/servlet/foo/HelloWorld/servlet-class /servlet /web-app - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JKMount, virtual hosts, and avoiding the webapp name
Mike Curwen wrote: I define an Apache Virtual Host in httpd.conf: VirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx JKMount /ATM tomcat1 JKMount /ATM/* tomcat1 I wouldn't do /ATM without a wildcard or something after it. DocumentRoot /home/webhome/atm/htdocs/ ServerName www.foo.com ServerAlias foo.com ErrorLog /var/log/atm/error_log CustomLog /var/log/atm/access_log combined /VirtualHost And in Tomcat server.xml: (inside the localhost 'host' element) Context path=/ATM docBase=/home/webhome/atm/ defaultSessionTimeOut=60 reloadable=true /Context So now to access regular static pages with apache, I just say: http://www.foo.com/xyz.html http://www.foo.com/pages/morepages/foo.html And to do servlet/jsp stuff: http://www.foo.com/ATM/servletFoo http://www.foo.com/ATM/foo.jsp http://www.foo.com/ATM/administer/admin.jsp This works fairly well, I suppose, but what about sites where MOST content is jsp/servlet based? I'd like my URLS to not require the /ATM token. You don't need it. So then I thought to do this (in apache): VirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx JKMount /*.jsp tomcat1 JKMount /*/*.jsp tomcat1 JKMount /servletFoo tomcat1 DocumentRoot /home/webhome/atm/htdocs/ ServerName www.foo.com ServerAlias foo.com ErrorLog /var/log/atm/error_log CustomLog /var/log/atm/access_log combined /VirtualHost Double wildcards is illegal. /*.jsp is equivalent to /*/*.jsp since the second / is covered by the * in /*.jsp. But how do I match up the requests from apache's virtual host www.foo.com to the /ATM context in Tomcat? Am I looking at creating a new Host in Tomcat for each VirtualHost in apache? Yes. And then the default webapp for each of my TC Hosts would be the /ATM application? You mean sharing Contexts across Hosts? I don't think so. Your Context path is just with the same docBase. Then your JkMounts are: JkMount /*.jsp worker-name JkMount /something-typically-servlet/* ajp13 John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JKMount, virtual hosts, and avoiding the webapp name
Mike Curwen wrote: So it's gonna be something like: The Apache Vhost: VirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx JKMount /*.jsp tomcat1 JKMount /fooservlet tomcat1 DocumentRoot /home/webhome/atm/htdocs/ ServerName www.foo.com ServerAlias foo.com ErrorLog /var/log/atm/error_log CustomLog /var/log/atm/access_log combined /VirtualHost relates to the TC Host: Host name=www.foo.com debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true Aliasfoo.com/Alias Context path= docBase=home/webhome/atm debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host Yeah, but I typically make DocumentRoot = ROOT docBase. So on my servers I have something like this: Host name=www.VIRTHOST.com debug=1 appBase=VIRTHOST unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true Context path= docBase=VIRTHOST debug=0 reloadable=true /Context /Host and VirtualHost * ServerName www.VIRTHOST.aas.com DocumentRoot /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27/VIRTHOST/VIRTHOST # Static files Alias / /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27/VIRTHOST/VIRTHOST Directory /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27/VIRTHOST/VIRTHOST Options Indexes FollowSymLinks DirectoryIndex index.jsp /Directory # Deny direct access to WEB-INF and META-INF Location /WEB-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location Location /META-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location JkMount /* ajp13 /VirtualHost Which makes the following dir structure possible: appBase $CATALINA_HOME/VIRTHOST Apache DocumentRoot, and TC root Context, path=, docBase=VIRTHOST: $CATALINA_HOME/VIRTHOST/VIRTHOST other Context, path=/SOME_OTHER_APP, docBase=SOME_OTHER_APP: $CATALINA_HOME/VIRTHOST/SOME_OTHER_APP Yes, #2 above is redundant with having the same dir name twice, but it makes sense to me. You could just as easily change it to ROOT or something else, but in my case, with many virtual hosts, I found myself saying ok, this is ROOT, but WHICH ROOT?. Using the domain name as the actual name of the directory for the root web app gets rid of this problem. For other Contexts, you just add additional Alias commands to httpd.conf to get Apache to recognize dirs on the same level as the DocRoot instead of sub-dirs. Is that correct? In this case, I'm replacing /ATM and /BDG apps with to Hosts under TC, with the default Context set to be a separate instance of that 'common' app. Pretty much, I would just watch the DocumentRoot and Alias in httpd.conf, they can play tricks on you if you have them pointing to directories one level above or below your Context's docBase. I'm wondering about this from workers.properties: worker.list=tomcat1 worker.tomcat1.host=localhost Will I need to define a new work for each new host in TC,or can I supply a comma separated list to the worker.tomcat1.host entry? No, you only need one worker. .host = location of machine running Tomcat, it does not need to match any virtual host name. I used to think it did, back in the day, but I have since seen the error of my ways and have come back to the straight and narrow. A basic 4-line workers.properties will work for many virtual hosts. I have servers with 5, 8, and 22 virtual hosts, all using one worker per physical server with no problems. Thanks very much John. :) Glad to help, if I am. Have fun. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TC 4.1.24 can't find my servlet-classes?
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/misc.html#invoker
John
Kenneth Ahn Jensen wrote:
After using Tomcat for a long time, I seem to be getting into trouble
lately. My Tomcat suddenly does not automatically find the servlets in
context-dir/WEB-INF/classes - so I have to make a web.xml file for each
context.
My server.xml is pretty much like the original, except for the user contexts
which all look like this:
Context path=/user/testuser docBase=user/testuser debug=0
reloadable=true crossContext=true/
The servlets are then placed like:
{$CATALINA_HOME}/webapps/user/testuser/WEB-INF/classes/HelloWorld.class
However, I get a 404 error when requesting
http://ip:port/user/testuser/servlet/HelloWorld - which I'm pretty sure
worked until a month ago (when the system crashed). Also I know for a fact
that it works on TC 4.04.
The {$CATALINA_HOME}/webapps/user/testuser/index.jsp gets loaded just fine
from the URL http://ip:port/user/testuser/index.jsp, so Tomcat has noticed
the context.
Any input will be much appreciated, as I have been trying to make this work
for some time now and I don't seem to get closer... :-(
The server is running students servlets on a university, and a lot of them
are just beginning on programming, so they shouldn't care about deployment
details (at least thats what the teachers tell me, the sysadmin :-).
I'm running Tomcat 4.1.24 with Sun Java 1.4.2 on Redhat 8.0 (and Mandrake
9.1).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib is Ignored, Doc Grip
FAQ/archives (at least weekly if not daily) NoClassDefFoundError != ClassNotFound John Tony LaPaso wrote: Hi all, I'm seeing behavior that seems contrary to the TC Documentation (seems to happen a lot). I'm running TC 5.0.9 on Win 2k, J2SDK 1.4.2_01. I have some JAR files (for JavaMail) in the $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib directory. I expect my web app will be able to use classes out of these JARs with no problem. Unfortunately, I get a NoClassDefFoundError when refering to classes in these JARs. If I move the JAR files to the $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib directory, however, the classes are found with no problem. According the (often innacurate) Tomcat documention, the $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib should be searched. See: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/class-loader-howto.html Does anyone have an explanation for why $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib is not being searched? And just what the heck is the difference between $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib vs. $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib?? angry-gripe The TC documentation refers to a directory, $CATALINA_HOME/lib and says that the following JARs are located there: jasper-compiler.jar, jasper-runtime.jar and naming-factory.jar. This is just another example of the shoddy TC documentation. These JAR files are all located in $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib. In fact, $CATALINA_HOME/lib doesn't even exist! /angry-gripe Thanks! Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://172.20.15.188(local ip:8080 did work ,but http://localhost:8080/didnotwork!!
THIS IS BAD. PUT IT BACK and DON'T CHANGE IT. John wrote: Hi, I have edited my /etc/hosts file ,changed 127.0.0.1 to 172.20.15.188,and http://localhsot:8080/ still doesnot work. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi,I have installed rpm version of tomcat 4.1.24 on Red hat Advanced Server.When I visited:http://172.20.15.188:8080,it did work(172.20.15.188 is my real lcoal network ip),but when I visited http://localhost:8080/,it didn't work. Can you help me out? Thankyou. _ Do You Yahoo!? []+ http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? []+ http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://cn.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which is the best way to install an application with connectionp ooling
There are a number of ways. If autoDeploy = true then you can just drop the WAR file in the Host's appBase directory. You can also use the manager app's various tasks (install, deploy, etc): http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/manager-howto.html This is easily accomplished with ant. John Kevin Passey wrote: I have normally stopped the server - edited the server XML file, put my war file in the webapps folder and re-started tomcat. Using the manager app - is there a way I can do this 1)from a remote system and 2)without manually editing the server XML file. I've have tried putting the jndi info using the admin console but I keep getting NULL driver exceptions. Thanks Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: permissions for Tomcat+Apache integration
Could you clarify? If you are using Apache, and you have *.jsp mapped correctly, your programming resources won't be shown to the world. Since all servlets are under WEB-INF, all you have to be concerned about are JSP. Properties files, etc. go under WEB-INF, as well. Applciation architecture best practices says don't put anything critical in a JSP, so what's the big risk? Going back to your earlier question, I simply set up a certain user account for both Apache and Tomcat. webuser or whatever. That user has restricted permissions and is a member of its own group (also webuser or whatever). Apache and Tomcat run as this user. Since developers should never have access to the command line on a production server, there's no problem. John Sonja Löhr wrote: You are very right in that my greatest problem is to work out a pattern where to find the static content hides that Apache could perhaps serve a bit faster. Unfortunately, I can't tell Apache to serve .gif etc. but must come the other way round, perhaps ending up with URLs to single servlets. Many people cite security-reasons for the integration of the two, but all I've been bothered up to now is how to prevent Apache to show my programming ressources to the world (those unfortunately not located in WEB-INF). I'll be thinking about doing it separately, you really calmed me down :-) thanks very much Sonja - Original Message - From: Eric J. Pinnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 4:28 PM Subject: Re: permissions for Tomcat+Apache integration Hi, The question is do you need to secure your application from the outside world or do you need to secure it from users that might be logging on to your system? Or both? Usually you want to go with the both scenerio. But to keep it simple, pick a user that you want tomcat to run as. Untar Tomcat and chown -R tomcat jakarta-4.x.x (if the user is named tomcat which isn't a bad name for the Tomcat user ;) Then just run it. It will be ok just like that. If you are running Tomcat and Apache on the same machine really look at why you are running Apache at all. It's a popular misconception that you _must_ run Apache in front of Tomcat. That couldn't be more wrong. Running Tomcat alone will save you the hassle of Apache and the connectors. However you do need to run Apache if you are going to use load balanceing and the apache modules. However most times people just have Apache pipe everything back to Tomcat. In this case you don't need Apache at all. -e On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] Sonja Löhr wrote: Hello! Here is my second question, now concerning Apache+Tomcat integration on Linux: Could someone tell me a reasonable users, groups and file permissions structure for apache, the tomcat-files itself and a typical webapp? - Java security aside. 1. Is it a good idea at all to place the webapps under apache's document root, having to care about all WEB-INF and other sensible directories with deny from all ? 2. Which account in which group? Apache needs access to static files somewhere in the webapp. (Which may be very dispersed f.e. in case of cocoon). If a tomcat user and the apache user account are in the same group with restricted permissions, I can't assign permissions to a group of developers, just another owner (me ;-). Ok, may it be. Additionally, if tomcat unpacks war files, all resulting directories are owned by tomcat alone. So should I put the apache user into the tomcat group? 3.How paranoid must I be about tomcat-files (server-directory f.e)? Tomcat needs write access to some directories, but certainly I don't know all processes tomcat. You probably guess by now that I'm not grown up with Unix-systems. Spent my whole sunday with chmod and chown, now I would be very happy if someone told me something SIMPLE :-) Thank you, Sonja - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Win2003 IIS6 ISAPI filter problem
Excellent. Thank you for posting this, many IIS users have posted to the list trying to get the redirector to work with IIS 6. John Nick Tatham wrote: I posted this thread back in June-03 as I was having problems making the ISAPI redirector work under IIS 6 on Windows 2003. Now thanks entirely to Andrew Duey of TerraScan Inc., I now have this working. If you are using IIS V6, which ships with Windows Server 2003, you must allow the Web Service Extension to operate. Earlier versions of IIS did not require this step. Using the IIS Internet Services Manager, click on the Web Services Extensions item in the left hand pane. In the right hand pane add a new Web Service Extension called, say, Tomcat ISAPI and browse and set the required file for this extension to the isapi_redirect.dll and set the status to allowed. Then restart IIS. It appears that no changes are needed to the standard Tomcat ISAPI redirector for this version of IIS. I hope this helps someone else. Nick -- Nick Tatham Peramon Technology Limited +44 118 984 0506 www.peramon.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 404 error on Tomcat 4.1.27...
What's the difference between your production environment and your laptop? Symlinks enabled? Invoker enabled? Etc. John Darryl L. Pierce wrote: My company has been using 4.0.6 for about a year now and we've recently upgraded to 4.1.27. On our production server, all works just fine: we can copy the WAR file into webapps, start Tomcat and all is well and good. However, on my development laptop, when I do the same thing with the same distribution, WAR file and configuration, I *always* get a 404 error. I checked inthe webapps directory and the servlet's context has been created (the WAR file is unpacked) and the class I'm trying to hit is there, but Tomcat is complaining that the resource is not available. This is also happening on a plain vanilla Tomcat installation. I unpacked the tarball, changed the server.xml to listen on the correct ports, and nothing, I get a 404 error. Any ideas? I'm running Debian GNU/Linux and am using J2SDK 1.4.1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Urgent !!! Problem to get TOMCAT/4.1.24 cluster running withsticky session support.
A couple of things: 1. Your workers.properties file (to me) seems needlessly complex. I would cut it down to match Pascal's example. 2. In your server.xml, you have jmvRoute. I don't load balance, but as far as I know it should be jvmRoute (note spelling). 3. You only sent one server.xml...there should be two. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi people, I still have no any progress , I've installed the newest version of tomcat 4.1.27 and build mod_jk from the sources. Still the same : all requests are sent to one tomcat , but if I shutdown it apache redirects the work to another one No error messages, in mod_jk.log I see that two balanced workers were found. Lots of web links say that load-balancing work , but in reallity they all point to one from Pascal Forget. I even cannot see anything added by tomcat to my session cookie. There are some conf files bellow. Any help or suggestion would be highly appreciated. P.S. My topic is still not in tomcat-users list. So what are criterias to put it there? -- Yefym MOD_JK.LOG [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (321)]: Into jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, match rule /ping/servlet/=loadbalancer was added [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (299)]: Into jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, suffix rule /ping/.jsp=loadbalancer was added [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (299)]: Into jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, suffix rule /ping/.do=loadbalancer was added [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (408)]: Into jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, there are 33 rules [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (422)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, done [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (88)]: Into wc_open [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (222)]: Into build_worker_map, creating 3 workers [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (228)]: build_worker_map, creating worker tomcat-worker-01 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (148)]: Into wc_create_worker [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (162)]: wc_create_worker, about to create instance tomcat-worker-01 of ajp13 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (108)]: Into ajp13_worker_factory [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (171)]: wc_create_worker, about to validate and init tomcat-worker-01 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1219)]: Into jk_worker_t::validate [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1239)]: In jk_worker_t::validate for worker tomcat-worker-01 contact is 172.31.7.20:5007 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1267)]: Into jk_worker_t::init [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1287)]: In jk_worker_t::init, setting socket timeout to 300 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (187)]: wc_create_worker, done [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (238)]: build_worker_map, removing old tomcat-worker-01 worker [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (228)]: build_worker_map, creating worker tomcat-worker-02 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (148)]: Into wc_create_worker [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (162)]: wc_create_worker, about to create instance tomcat-worker-02 of ajp13 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (108)]: Into ajp13_worker_factory [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (171)]: wc_create_worker, about to validate and init tomcat-worker-02 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1219)]: Into jk_worker_t::validate [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1239)]: In jk_worker_t::validate for worker tomcat-worker-02 contact is 172.31.7.12:6007 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1267)]: Into jk_worker_t::init [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1287)]: In jk_worker_t::init, setting socket timeout to 300 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (187)]: wc_create_worker, done [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (238)]: build_worker_map, removing old tomcat-worker-02 worker [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (228)]: build_worker_map, creating worker loadbalancer [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (148)]: Into wc_create_worker [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (162)]: wc_create_worker, about to create instance loadbalancer of lb [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_lb_worker.c (586)]: Into lb_worker_factory [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (171)]: wc_create_worker, about to validate and init loadbalancer [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_lb_worker.c (420)]: Into jk_worker_t::validate [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (148)]: Into wc_create_worker [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (162)]: wc_create_worker, about to create instance tomcat-worker-01 of ajp13 [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (108)]: Into ajp13_worker_factory [Fri Aug 29 08:21:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (171)]: wc_create_worker,
Re: need help in apache tomcat 4.0
This describes exactly where you should put files:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/appdev/index.html
And you also might find the ClassLoader HOWTO helpful:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/class-loader-howto.html
John
sheba Tasaduque wrote:
hi
ERROR
v:http://localhost:8080/examples/servlet/UploadServlet (fetch post)
E: Event error.badfetch:line13:java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://localhost:8080/examples/servlet/UploadServlet
==
I want to ask about correct path for addition in apache tomcat 4.0.Actaully i want to get sound file through servlet and for this i have downloaded the class, MultipartRequest, written by Jason Hunter which is available for download at http://www.servlets.com/cos/index.html.you can read Complete documentation for the class at http://www.servlets.com/cos/javadoc/com/oreilly/servlet/MultipartRequest.html.
After downloading now i am facing problem of placing the classes and etc.I have downloaded cos-05Nov2002.zip and in this zip i got classes folder+doc folder+src folder+upload.war+cos.jar.
now i dont understand where i put these things in apache tomact 4.0 and jdk1.3.0_02.IN jdk1.3 i have putted servlet.jar+cos.jar in jre\lib\ext\.through this i have successfully compiled my servlet but now after putting the class files of servlets in apache tomcat\webapps\examples\web-inf\classes whenever i submit record file from recordmessege to Uploadmessege then i m getting error of file not found as given above.
=recordmessege.java===
initial code
---
---
submit next=\http://localhost:8080/examples/servlet/UploadServlet\; enctype=\multipart/form-data\ namelist=\messege\ method=\post\ /
---
---
and from net i got following submit but i dont know about that upload.cgi thats why i have putted
http://localhost:8080/examples/servlet/UploadServlet.
submit src=upload.cgi namelist=recording
method=post enctype=multipart/form-data/
UploadServlet.java===
import javax.servlet.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
import java.io.*;
import com.oreilly.servlet.MultipartRequest;
public class UploadServlet extends HttpServlet {
public void doPost(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res)
throws ServletException, IOException
{
// Get output stream.
ServletOutputStream out = res.getOutputStream();
// establish directory in which to save recordings and
5MB upload limit
MultipartRequest multi = new MultipartRequest(req,/recordings/, 5242880);
// Send a response back to VXML client.
res.setContentType(text/xml);
out.println(?xml version=\1.0\?);
out.println(vxml version=\1.0\formblock);
out.println(promptYour greeting was saved./promptexit//block/form/vxml);
out.flush();
out.close();
}
}
=
Regard
SHEBA TASADUQUE
n
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newbie:web application
ROFL Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, Thank you for the clear instructions ;) I believe I have a fairly firm grasp on webapp structure as well as the rest of tomcat ;) But I'm sure the original poster whose question I answered will find your response beneficial. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Schalk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:30 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Newbie:web application Yoav Ok, first your webapp folder structure: Tomcat/webapps/myApp Tomcat/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/ Tomcat/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/classes/ # ALL class files go here Tomcat/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/lib/ # All .jar files goes here Tomcat/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/web.xml # This is your deployment descriptor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Context
Robert Charbonneau wrote: It's not working as the root of the tomcat server on port 8080, but I wasn't expecting it to. I want the root of the domain being able to serve JSPs and Servlets so I don't have to create a subdirectory off of the root for this purpose. That won't work. You must create a subdirectory. All webapps live in directories, that's just how it works. The root context looks like this: Context path= docBase=someDir /Context Here's how I do it (YMMV). URL= http://some.domain.com Host name=some.domain.com appBase=some.domain.com Context path= docBase=some.domain.com /Context /Host Then index.jsp goes in $CATALINA_HOME/some.host.com/some.host.com. A little redundant, but for me it is a good reminder. So you end up with: $CATALINA_HOME $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/some.domain.com $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/some.domain.com/index.jsp $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/some.domain.com/WEB-INF $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/some.domain.com/WEB-INF/web.xml $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/some.domain.com/WEB-INF/classes $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/some.domain.com/WEB-INF/lib This lets other webapps in the same Host node be subdirs without confusing things. As shown in server.xml, you can also follow the convention of naming the docBase of the root webapp ROOT, in which case index.jsp would go in $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/ROOT and you would have something like: $CATALINA_HOME $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/ROOT $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/ROOT/index.jsp $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/ROOT/WEB-INF $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/ROOT/WEB-INF/classes $CATALINA_HOME/some.domain.com/ROOT/WEB-INF/lib Remember that the actual directory name is transparent to the user...the only person who will ever know that something is in a subdir is the administrator. Users can still get to http://some.domain.com/whatever.jsp. Once you have that set up, you can add welcome-file/welcome-file to your web.xml file and set it to index.jsp, and turn off directory listings as well. Also try path=, not path=/ for your Context. Sorry about that, most mailing lists I belong to are pretty free form. I'll keep an eye on the amount of data sent in the future. We're pretty casual here as well...we just see the same files posted over and over (server.xml, httpd.conf, etc), so scrolling through 200 lines that aren't changed from the default and checking every line to see if its the same as the default or not is pretty tedious. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple Virtual Hosts on 1 instance of Tomcat
Caveat: I don't use IIS. I don't use JK2. You need full setup in uriworkermap.properties for the second virtual host. You also need some sort of virtual directory or something created within the webroot (again, I don't use IIS but that is what I remember from reading numerous posts on this list). Basically, as far as I know, everything you did for localhost or host1 you have to do again for each successive virtual host, short of installing the redirector. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure what configuration the IIS connector would need. I'm using the redirector plug in 2.0 that points to the workers file. I thought that was all I needed for the IIS part. As for doesn't work. I get a 404-error page from IIS when I go to the web page. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:15 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Multiple Virtual Hosts on 1 instance of Tomcat Can you be more specific than doesn't work? Have you done all of the configuration with your IIS connector required for the second virtual host? John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. Thanks for taking the time to read this. First of all, I am assuming that virtual hosts are where you have more than one url pointing to a web server. Each url has it's own data. Not redirection. I have a web server that handles 5 virtual hosts using IIS. I've configured tomcat to work with IIS and serve JSP pages for 1 of the virtual hosts. I used the default server.xml file that came with the installation. So my server.xml file looks like this. Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=0 Host name=www.site1.com debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=psc_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=E:/Inetpub/wwwroot/www.site1.com debug=0 reloadable=true / /Host Host name=www.site2.com debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=psc_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=E:/Inetpub/wwwroot/www.site2.com debug=0 reloadable=true / /Host /Engine Site1 works. Site 2 doesn't. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: simple workers.properties question (John Turner's how-to)
It just needs to equal location of tomcat. I used to think it had to match the ServerName...it doesn't. It's merely a pointer to the machine that is running Tomcat. If Apache and Tomcat are on the same machine, then localhost is fine. John Denise Mangano wrote: According to the how-to, I created the workers.properties file. My question is simple: Is it ok to leave: worker.ajp13.host = localhost or should I change it to: worker.ajp13.host = www.mydomain.com In my httpd.conf my ServerName is www.mydomain.com, and in my server.xml the Host name is www.mydomain.com Thanks :) Denise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement(revisited)
I woudl skip the Include statement and modify httpd.conf manually as you have. For anything but a simple configuration, you have to do it anyway, so there's no real loss. John Denise Mangano wrote: Not really sure if this is a problem as of yet. I currently cannot test my configuration ... But I just wanted to write again regarding this issue. As I followed the how-to, I did things a little out of order. Before changing Tomcat, and while Tomcat was not running, I added the LoadModule and Include statements into httpd.conf. I then ran an apachectl configtest. The configtest executed fine and I was returned an error message that the file mod_jk.conf could not be found. This was right, because the file was not generated yet. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement(revisited)
A good test would be to create a file called test.conf in APACHE_HOME/conf. In that file, put the following: ### ### this is an apache comment ### Change the Include line in httpd.conf to include the file test.conf and NOT mod_jk.conf. Then start Apache or run configtest and see what happens. If it hangs, its definitely an Apache issue. John Denise Mangano wrote: Not really sure if this is a problem as of yet. I currently cannot test my configuration ... But I just wanted to write again regarding this issue. As I followed the how-to, I did things a little out of order. Before changing Tomcat, and while Tomcat was not running, I added the LoadModule and Include statements into httpd.conf. I then ran an apachectl configtest. The configtest executed fine and I was returned an error message that the file mod_jk.conf could not be found. This was right, because the file was not generated yet. I then set up server.xml and created my workers.properties and started Tomcat, which started no problem. I then went back to apache and ran another configtest, and surprise... It hangs... And so does apachectl start ...So we're back to the same issue. I am having a hard time at this point believing it is an Apache issue, because the configtest executed fine with the include before Tomcat was started and before the mod_jk.conf was created. So what I did next was one at a time, I added in the Jk statements into the httpd.conf to rule out this being an issue with the mod_jk module(?). First I added in the JkWorkersFile, then ran a configtest. Then added in the JkLogFile and ran a configtest. Lastly added in some JkMount statements and ran a configtest. At each of these points, the configtest executed and was successful. I can also start and stop apache no problem. As I mentioned, I cannot test whether or not mod_jk works just yet (network issues)... There were no errors when starting either Tomcat or apache. But I do find it strange that I can't start apache just because I have the Include statement. Any further thoughts on this? The output of httpd -l just lists mod_core and mod_so. I have all other modules added as DSO's. Thanks :) DEnise -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:08 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement Cool. My typical Apache build is: ./configure --enable-so --enable-ssl make make install John Denise Mangano wrote: Yes I am. The problem (right now) definitely appears to be some issues with Apache. Unfortunately, the Apache list isn't as heavily trafficked, or as quick to response, so I'm still waiting on some replies while I search the archives. I think I have to recompile Apache. I added in a few extra flags when I did this yesterday to make it more secure but I think I am better off just keeping it as is, then taking out what I don't need later... Won't be able to determine if I have a mod_jk problem at all until I get my Apache running properly. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:47 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: [OFF-TOPIC] Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement Are you loading mod_ssl? I'm marking this as off-topic because we haven't determined that this is a JK/Tomcat problem yet. John Denise Mangano wrote: Yeah, it appears to be my apache. I still get that SSLMutex error. I have to work on getting that resolved. This is the output of httpd -l: http_core.c mod_env.c mod_log_config.c mod_mime.c mod_negotiation.c mod_status.c mod_include.c mod_dir.c mod_cgi.c mod_asis.c mod_imap.c mod_actions.c mod_alias.c mod_access.c mod_auth.c mod_so.c mod_setenvif.c suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/local/apache/bin/suexec Denise -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:25 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement Hate to say it, but it sounds like your Apache is munged up. If you delete the mod_jk.conf Include, and you delete all other JK stuff from httpd.conf, your Apache starts up properly, with no errors? What is the output of httpd -l? John Denise Mangano wrote: OK, I tried adding the Jk directives directly into the httpd.conf file, and apache at least starts. So the problem is the include statement. Is it possible that I don't have whatever module is needed to support the Include statement? So now the problem is that although apache starts, it does not start properly. When I run ps -aux | grep httpd I get the following: www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00
Re: Using
Raj Dasgupta wrote: I am a novice with Tomcat and am trying to connect Tomcat to our Iplanet Web Server 4.11 on Solaris using the JK2 connector. Here are my questions: 1. How do I download the JK2 connector? Everytime I try to download from http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0. 2/src/ I get a jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src.tar.gz that has a .tar.tar extension that seems to be corrupt. Its corrupt because you're most likely using Solaris tar to extract the files. GNU projects require GNU tar. GNU tar and Solaris tar are incompatible. Try extracting with GNU tar. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk and Tomcat Lose Touch
Sounds to me like an OS resource issue. Total number of allowed open connections, etc. Since it worked on 7.x and not on 9, I would consider that a default changed somewhere, somehow. John Also, the same Apache 1.3.X and Tomcat 3.X and 4.X configurations worked perfectly on Red Hat 7.3, it was not until RH 9 that this began occuring. The behavior is consistent with Apache 1.3 and Apache 2 on RH 9. I've tried re-compiling and all the usual tricks. ... Do you use multiple Apaches on the server? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement
Hi - Things I would check: - apache's access and error log - is Apache trying to handle the request instead of Tomcat? - Tomcat's log - is Tomcat even getting the request? - move mod_jk.conf to APACHE_HOME/conf, change your Include to match. Then change JkLogLevel to debug or info (I forget which..try info first) and check mod_jk.log for more info - verify a Connector on port 8009 - doublecheck your workers.properties file, especially the .host parameter John Denise Mangano wrote: I've been following John Turner's how-to (diff apache version but the instructions can still apply). I think they problem is a permission issue, but wanted some verification. Apache install is ok, Tomcat install is ok. I followed the steps, and added the Listeners, and the LoadModule and Include statement at the end of my httpd.conf. When I uncomment the Include statement apache starts up no problem. When I try to use it, my system just hangs as I try to start apache. Tomcat is running under user tomcat, and all directories from /usr/local/tomcat down have rwx for tomcat, and r only for all others. However, Apache runs as user 'www'. I tried changing permissions to be executable by all but that didn't seem to do the trick. The system still hangs when I try to start Apache. Here is my structure with permissions: --usr drwxr-xr-x --local drwxr-xr-x --apache drwxr-xr-x --tomcat drwxr-xr-x --conf drwxr-xr-x --auto drwxr-xr-x mod_jk.conf -rwxr-xr-x If its not a permissions issue, then I'm quite clueless as to what it can be. I can't even run a config test. Any suggestions/advice is greatly appreciated. Denise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vhosts and workers
Christopher Garrett wrote: Home appBase=/home/vhost1/public_html/webapps/... ... Home appBase=/home/vhost2/public_html/webapps/... - setting the docBase/path attributes in the child Context tag to some directory within the appBase path: Home appBase=/home/vhost1/public_html/webapps/... Context docBase=app1 path=/app1... ... Home appBase=/home/vhost2/public_html/webapps/... Context docBase=app1 path=/app1... I'm assuming you mean Host instead of Home. My questions: 1: Would the aforementioned configuration properly serve JSPs/Servlets from locations beneath vhost1 and vhost2's home directories? Yes. 2: What exactly do the docBase and path attributes define within the Context tag? What is the distinction? Path = URL. docBase = webapp root. If you have a virtual host www.domain.com, and path = /demo with a docBase of demo, then the webapp called demo will be reached by: http://www.domain.com/demo and the webapp will be located at appBase/demo. 3: It is possible to have a single worker handle requests for more than one web application belonging to more than one virtual host/user. How beneficial would it be to have a single worker handle requests sent to it from Apache for more than one virtual host? Would it be more efficient to have one worker for each virtual host and have a load balancing worker to manage those subordinate workers? Yes. Mostly. No...load balancing is typically for multiple Tomcat instances. If you have just one, stick with one worker. I run several dozen virtual hosts, each with several Contexts (webapps) and have no problems whatsoever with one worker under significant load. 4: What sort of mechanisms to workers use to handle requests? Does a worker receive a request, fork(), child process handles the request, communicates with the Tomcat JVM, and returns the result to the requesting client, while the parent simply sits and listens for more connections? If this is the case, would a load balancer really serve to benefit anything if all this is taking place on a single machine, given that all the workers would be of type ajp13? If a single Tomcat instance, no. If multiple Tomcat instances, possibly, but the only definite answer is test and see for yourself since everyone's configuration is different. From my experience, one worker and a single instance of Tomcat 4.1.x is just fine. If I went to multiple instances of Tomcat, I would use separate machines. I'm trying to achieve and optimal, secure configuration. One that would allow the users to manage their own web applications within their home directories so I don't have to open up rwx access to the world beneath the $TOMCAT_HOME directory. Granted, I'll still have to amend server.xml to insert new contexts for users adding new WARs, but this is trivial. I've read a number of articles and even the manual describing configuration options, etc., but it seems that there are just a few points missing that would really put things into perspective for me, so I'm sending these, probably simple, questions to the list, as my last resort. Any information or links would be greatly appreciated, and hopefully I'll be able to get everything organized efficiently and securely. If you train your users to use Tomcat's manager application (and ideally ant) then you won't ever have to do anything...they can deploy, stop, start, and restart their web applications as they wish, without your intervention, the only thing you would have to manage is the tomcat-users.xml file to give them the appropriate access permissions and the Host nodes in server.xml. Contexts (webapps) can be autodeployed. HTH John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement
What's the output of APACHE_HOME/bin/apachectl configtest? John Denise Mangano wrote: John - I just realized that I explained it slightly wrong. When I comment the Include statement, apache starts ok. When I uncomment apache will not start. I checked what you suggested. As Bill suggested, I am including my conf files as well. 1. Apache's error logs are completely empty ... Yesterday I checked them and they had the following: [error]mod_ssl: Child could not open SSLMutex lockfile /usr/local/apache/logs/ssl_mutex.30776 (System error follows) [error]System: Permission denied (errno: 13) That was a permissions issue, which I corrected. Now when after starting apache, I wait about 10 seconds, then attempt to start Apache and it hangs, but nothing is written to either the access_log or the error_log. 2. The only thing in Tomcat's log is the server starting and stopping... Here's the relevant mod_jk output: INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8080 INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8009 INFO: JK2: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0./8009 INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/28 config=/usr/local/tomcat/conf/jk2.properties Same thing that I had on my previous installation. Not sure why there is mention of jk2.properties. 3. Tried moving mod_jk.conf and changing the include statement but still apache is a no go... 4. There are two connectors on port 8009 in the server.xml file. These are still the defaults: !-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=10 debug=0 connectionTimeout=0 useURIValidationHack=false protocolHandlerClassName=org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler/ !-- Define an AJP1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- !-- Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 acceptCount=10 debug=0/ -- 5. workers.properties file in /usr/local/tomcat/conf/jk #BEGIN workers.properties worker.list=ajp13 worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=localhost worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 #END workers.properties Thanks, Denise -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:19 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement Hi - Things I would check: - apache's access and error log - is Apache trying to handle the request instead of Tomcat? - Tomcat's log - is Tomcat even getting the request? - move mod_jk.conf to APACHE_HOME/conf, change your Include to match. Then change JkLogLevel to debug or info (I forget which..try info first) and check mod_jk.log for more info - verify a Connector on port 8009 - doublecheck your workers.properties file, especially the .host parameter John Denise Mangano wrote: I've been following John Turner's how-to (diff apache version but the instructions can still apply). I think they problem is a permission issue, but wanted some verification. Apache install is ok, Tomcat install is ok. I followed the steps, and added the Listeners, and the LoadModule and Include statement at the end of my httpd.conf. When I uncomment the Include statement apache starts up no problem. When I try to use it, my system just hangs as I try to start apache. Tomcat is running under user tomcat, and all directories from /usr/local/tomcat down have rwx for tomcat, and r only for all others. However, Apache runs as user 'www'. I tried changing permissions to be executable by all but that didn't seem to do the trick. The system still hangs when I try to start Apache. Here is my structure with permissions: --usr drwxr-xr-x --local drwxr-xr-x --apache drwxr-xr-x --tomcat drwxr-xr-x --conf drwxr-xr-x --auto drwxr-xr-x mod_jk.conf -rwxr-xr-x If its not a permissions issue, then I'm quite clueless as to what it can be. I can't even run a config test. Any suggestions/advice is greatly appreciated. Denise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] !-- Example Server Configuration File -- !-- Note that component elements are nested corresponding to their parent-child relationships with each other -- !-- A Server is a singleton element that represents the entire JVM
Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement
configtest doesn't return an error? It just hangs? That is very funky. Can you post your mod_jk.conf? John Denise Mangano wrote: The same thing happens... It just hangs Also, the same situation. If I comment out the Include statement in httpd.conf I can run the configtest ok. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement What's the output of APACHE_HOME/bin/apachectl configtest? John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Context
Sure, as soon as you give us insight such as: - what's wrong, exactly - what error messages you're getting - what version of Tomcat - what version of Apache, what connector - whether its working in Tomcat standalone, without Apache - what URL you are trying to use Specific information is best. Saying it doesn't work doesn't help us help you. Also, there is more involved in Apache + Tomcat than just server.xml, so you will need to give us that information as well (please don't post entire files...just snippets showing deviations from defaults is sufficient). John Robert Charbonneau wrote: I was trying to setup Tomcat to allow Apache to serve *.jsp files from the DocumentRoot of Apache. I had setup the following: Context path=/ docBase=/jsps/global/root debug=9 reloadable=true Loader checkInterval=3/ Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.SystemOutLogger timestamp=true/ /Context /Host /Engine /Service /Server I'm wondering if anyone can give me any insight as to how I can make this work properly. Thanks. -- Robert Charbonneau [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement
Hate to say it, but it sounds like your Apache is munged up. If you delete the mod_jk.conf Include, and you delete all other JK stuff from httpd.conf, your Apache starts up properly, with no errors? What is the output of httpd -l? John Denise Mangano wrote: OK, I tried adding the Jk directives directly into the httpd.conf file, and apache at least starts. So the problem is the include statement. Is it possible that I don't have whatever module is needed to support the Include statement? So now the problem is that although apache starts, it does not start properly. When I run ps -aux | grep httpd I get the following: www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] And needless to say I can't get to my web page. Now again I am getting those error messages in both my error_log and ssl_engine_log: [error]mod_ssl: Child could not open SSLMutex lockfile /usr/local/apache/logs/ssl_mutex.30776 (System error follows) [error]System: Permission denied (errno: 13) So apparently I have a problem with mod_ssl, which I guess I didn't resolve yesterday and should post to the apache list. But the question still remains why using the Include statement would prevent Apache from starting at all? Thanks for your help :) Denise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OFF-TOPIC] Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Includestatement
Are you loading mod_ssl? I'm marking this as off-topic because we haven't determined that this is a JK/Tomcat problem yet. John Denise Mangano wrote: Yeah, it appears to be my apache. I still get that SSLMutex error. I have to work on getting that resolved. This is the output of httpd -l: http_core.c mod_env.c mod_log_config.c mod_mime.c mod_negotiation.c mod_status.c mod_include.c mod_dir.c mod_cgi.c mod_asis.c mod_imap.c mod_actions.c mod_alias.c mod_access.c mod_auth.c mod_so.c mod_setenvif.c suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/local/apache/bin/suexec Denise -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:25 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement Hate to say it, but it sounds like your Apache is munged up. If you delete the mod_jk.conf Include, and you delete all other JK stuff from httpd.conf, your Apache starts up properly, with no errors? What is the output of httpd -l? John Denise Mangano wrote: OK, I tried adding the Jk directives directly into the httpd.conf file, and apache at least starts. So the problem is the include statement. Is it possible that I don't have whatever module is needed to support the Include statement? So now the problem is that although apache starts, it does not start properly. When I run ps -aux | grep httpd I get the following: www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] And needless to say I can't get to my web page. Now again I am getting those error messages in both my error_log and ssl_engine_log: [error]mod_ssl: Child could not open SSLMutex lockfile /usr/local/apache/logs/ssl_mutex.30776 (System error follows) [error]System: Permission denied (errno: 13) So apparently I have a problem with mod_ssl, which I guess I didn't resolve yesterday and should post to the apache list. But the question still remains why using the Include statement would prevent Apache from starting at all? Thanks for your help :) Denise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache withInclude statement
Cool. My typical Apache build is: ./configure --enable-so --enable-ssl make make install John Denise Mangano wrote: Yes I am. The problem (right now) definitely appears to be some issues with Apache. Unfortunately, the Apache list isn't as heavily trafficked, or as quick to response, so I'm still waiting on some replies while I search the archives. I think I have to recompile Apache. I added in a few extra flags when I did this yesterday to make it more secure but I think I am better off just keeping it as is, then taking out what I don't need later... Won't be able to determine if I have a mod_jk problem at all until I get my Apache running properly. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:47 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: [OFF-TOPIC] Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement Are you loading mod_ssl? I'm marking this as off-topic because we haven't determined that this is a JK/Tomcat problem yet. John Denise Mangano wrote: Yeah, it appears to be my apache. I still get that SSLMutex error. I have to work on getting that resolved. This is the output of httpd -l: http_core.c mod_env.c mod_log_config.c mod_mime.c mod_negotiation.c mod_status.c mod_include.c mod_dir.c mod_cgi.c mod_asis.c mod_imap.c mod_actions.c mod_alias.c mod_access.c mod_auth.c mod_so.c mod_setenvif.c suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/local/apache/bin/suexec Denise -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:25 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: First mod_jk problem - can't start apache with Include statement Hate to say it, but it sounds like your Apache is munged up. If you delete the mod_jk.conf Include, and you delete all other JK stuff from httpd.conf, your Apache starts up properly, with no errors? What is the output of httpd -l? John Denise Mangano wrote: OK, I tried adding the Jk directives directly into the httpd.conf file, and apache at least starts. So the problem is the include statement. Is it possible that I don't have whatever module is needed to support the Include statement? So now the problem is that although apache starts, it does not start properly. When I run ps -aux | grep httpd I get the following: www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] www 80740.0 0.0 00 ?Z10:070:00 [httpd defunct] And needless to say I can't get to my web page. Now again I am getting those error messages in both my error_log and ssl_engine_log: [error]mod_ssl: Child could not open SSLMutex lockfile /usr/local/apache/logs/ssl_mutex.30776 (System error follows) [error]System: Permission denied (errno: 13) So apparently I have a problem with mod_ssl, which I guess I didn't resolve yesterday and should post to the apache list. But the question still remains why using the Include statement would prevent Apache from starting at all? Thanks for your help :) Denise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Limit local connections
When in doubt, check the docs. Remote Address Filter and Remote Host Filter: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/valve.html John Mario Moroni wrote: In order to develop in peace i'd like to limit my tomcat only to local connections. is it possible? How? ..or should I make a control for every page requested? _Mario_ -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Consigli su piante, fiori e bonsai? Affidati a Mr. Green, clicca qui! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=749d=27-8 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and IIS 6 - Please HELP
Many people have the same problem (archives!). As far as I know, there is no redirector built and available for IIS 6. You either have to build it yourself, or wait for someone else to build it. Even if you build it, there's no guarantee the source that works with IIS 5 will work unmodified for IIS 6, so you will then need to wait for someone savvy enough in IIS 6 internals to make the appropriate changes and post the changes to CVS. Economic incentives might speed this process up...I doubt anything else will. John Renato Romano wrote: I'm trying to configure IIS (6) to forward requests to Tomcat (4.1.18): the configuration works fine with IIS 5, but with IIS 6, though I don't get error messages, and the ISAPI filter shows the green upward arrow, the browsere gets a 404 error. I'm pretty sure there is no config error, because I copied the configuration from a working installation with IIS 5, so I think the problem is the IIS version. I could not find any help on the net... Does anyone had the same problem ?? Thanks Renato Renato Romano Sistemi e Telematica S.p.A. Calata Grazie - Vial Al Molo Giano 16127 - GENOVA e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: 010 2712603 _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and IIS 6 - Please HELP
FAQ http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/connectors.html and http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8q=tomcat+iis+5btnG=Google+Search which would eventually lead you to: http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/12/18/tomcat.html John J Raf wrote: Hi, I also have a similar question. Where is the documentation for making IIS 5. work with Tomcat 4.1.18 or 4.1.27? The documentation I was able to find reference 3.X. My Tomcat 4.X installation does not include any files such as workers2.properties. Thank you for your help. From: Renato Romano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and IIS 6 - Please HELP Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:33:19 +0200 I'm trying to configure IIS (6) to forward requests to Tomcat (4.1.18): the configuration works fine with IIS 5, but with IIS 6, though I don't get error messages, and the ISAPI filter shows the green upward arrow, the browsere gets a 404 error. I'm pretty sure there is no config error, because I copied the configuration from a working installation with IIS 5, so I think the problem is the IIS version. I could not find any help on the net... Does anyone had the same problem ?? Thanks Renato Renato Romano Sistemi e Telematica S.p.A. Calata Grazie - Vial Al Molo Giano 16127 - GENOVA e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: 010 2712603 _ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't access tomcat pages with https://
Denise Mangano wrote: Apache is configured for SSL and http://localhost and https://localhost Tomcat : I can access http://localhost:8080 but not https://localhost:8080 Why would this be the case? Because Tomcat doesn't have SSL setup by default. Check the SSL HOWTO in the docs for more info. If you do get it set up, it would be https://localhost:8443 I would like to get this resolved before I move back to setting up mod_jk. Or wait a second... is it because of mod_jk that I was able to go from http://localhost/index.jsp to https://localhost/index.jsp ?? Actually, if your plan is to use Apache and a connector, there is no gain in setting up SSL for Tomcat other than experience and knowledge. In an Apache + connector + Tomcat environment, the only SSL configuration is done in Apache. Tomcat has no SSL configuration in that environment, since all requests come in via AJP on standard port like 8009. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't access tomcat pages with https://
Yes. You wouldn't do it in a connector environment. John Denise Mangano wrote: Even though I don't plan on using Tomcat as a standalone? My intention is to run it behind Apache using mod_jk. All incoming traffic will be coming in to my site from port 80 or port 443 which is configured on Apache's site. If I configured Tomcat for port 443 as well, wouldn't that cause a conflict? Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newbie
Without more specific information, my guess is you don't have a JkMount for /examples in your SSL VirtualHost for localhost. John Tran, Khiem (NIH/CIT) wrote: Hi, I am a newbie to Apache Tomcat. I got the instruction of the following URL. http://myweb.cableone.net/kdubuisson/Install.PDF I installed and it worked fine. I tried https://localhost/examples but it did not work. Please help me. Thanks in advance. -KT Packages installed Red Hat Linux 7.3 httpd-2.0.47.tar.gz j2sdk-1_4_1_04-linux-i586.bin jakarta-tomcat-4.1.24.tar.gz jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.1.18-src.tar.gz openssl-0.9.7.tar.gz - Worked fine --- https://localhost/ https://kt.domainname/ http://localhost/examples Did not work --- https://localhost/examples Not Found The requested URL /examples was not found on this server. Apache/2.0.47 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.47 OpenSSL/0.9.6b mod_jk/1.2.2-dev Server at localhost Port 443 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple Virtual Hosts on 1 instance of Tomcat
Can you be more specific than doesn't work? Have you done all of the configuration with your IIS connector required for the second virtual host? John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. Thanks for taking the time to read this. First of all, I am assuming that virtual hosts are where you have more than one url pointing to a web server. Each url has it's own data. Not redirection. I have a web server that handles 5 virtual hosts using IIS. I've configured tomcat to work with IIS and serve JSP pages for 1 of the virtual hosts. I used the default server.xml file that came with the installation. So my server.xml file looks like this. Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=0 Host name=www.site1.com debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=psc_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=E:/Inetpub/wwwroot/www.site1.com debug=0 reloadable=true / /Host Host name=www.site2.com debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=psc_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=E:/Inetpub/wwwroot/www.site2.com debug=0 reloadable=true / /Host /Engine Site1 works. Site 2 doesn't. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 4.1.27 rpm files
To uninstall Tomcat: rm -rf $CATALINA_HOME John Purvis Robert wrote: I have been waiting for the RPM format files to appear on the Tomcat download site, but they don't seem to be there yet. Is there any plan to make Tomcat 4.1.27 available as RPMs? I personally always prefer installing from RPM as its much easier to control the uninstall process. Rob --- Robert Purvis e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you for your co-operation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The requested resource (/admsite/servlet/servlet.servletAdmSite)is not available
??? = whatever you put in url-pattern. That is Yoav's point...it is up to you. Your choice. John L.Karam wrote: Well, my servlet is in the directory: /admsite/servlet and is named servletAdmSite. What should be typed here: url-pattern???/url-pattern And what is the URL to be adressed to, i.e: http://localhost:8080/??? Tks - Original Message - From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: RE: The requested resource (/admsite/servlet/servlet.servletAdmSite) is not available Howdy, With your mapping the URL to access your servlet is simply /admsite not /admsite/servlet/servlet.servletAdmSite. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: L.Karam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The requested resource (/admsite/servlet/servlet.servletAdmSite) is not available Hi, When I try to access a servlet I get the following message: HTTP Status 404 - /admsite/servlet/servlet.servletAdmSite --- - type Status report message /admsite/servlet/servlet.servletAdmSite description The requested resource (/admsite/servlet/servlet.servletAdmSite) is not available. --- - Apache Tomcat/4.1.24 I have verified in the tomcat manager that my application is correctly started. I have also created the WEB.XML in the Web-Inf folder, and it looks as this: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? !DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd; web-app servlet servlet-nameservletAdmSite/servlet-name servlet-classservlet.servletAdmSite/servlet-class /servlet servlet-mapping servlet-nameservletAdmSite/servlet-name url-pattern/admsite/url-pattern /servlet-mapping /web-app My directory tree: webapps/admsite/web-inf/classes/servlet Please, can anybody help me solve this? Thanks Leandro Karam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configuring Tomcat to NOT run as Root
Tomcat runs as whatever user executes the startup scripts in $CATALINA_HOME/bin. If that user is root, then Tomcat runs as root. If that user is nobody, then Tomcat's effective user is nobody. There's no (current) facility in Tomcat to switch UID as Apache does after startup. As root, something like: su - SOMEUSER -c $CATALINA_HOME/bin/startup.sh will run Tomcat as the user defined by SOMEUSER. John Scott W Ricketts wrote: I am helping set up a Citrix NFuse server running on Solaris, using Tomcat and Apache 1.3. The default install for NFuse 1.7 does not fire up Apache, rather it calls Tomcat to start alone. The default also has this running as root, something I am very uncomfortable with. I have Googled and searched archives, and whenever mentioned, it sounds rather trivial but I cannot find where in my config files to set this to run as 'nobody'. I am totally clueless with Tomcat, can anyone help? This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service.___ Note: Please update your email address for this user to reflect the new MeadWestvaco Corporation. MeadWestvaco employee email addresses are in the format of [EMAIL PROTECTED] This electronic message contains information from MeadWestvaco Corporation or subsidiary companies, which may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this transmission or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify MeadWestvaco immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 VirtualHosts now work, mod_jk not
The DocumentRoot is /. Host name=myHost appBase=myHost Context path= docBase=se ($CATALINA_HOME/myHost/se) Context path=/rwtransform docBase=rwtransform ($CATALINA_HOME/myHost/rwtransform) DocumentRoot /some/path/to/myHost Please understand that DocumentRoot is for Apache only. It instructs Apache where to find files that ARE NOT covered by your JkMount. DocumentRoot does nothing for Tomcat. Thus, put index.html, etc. in $CATALINA_HOME/myHost. Alternatively, setup a root context: Context path= docBase=ROOT ($CATALINA_HOME/myHost/ROOT) In that context, setup a welcome-file in web.xml as index.jsp. In index.jsp, do a forward/redirect to myHost/se. Then your se Context would look like: Context path=/se docBase=se ($CATALINA_HOME/myHost/se) I really, really, really, really suggest getting all of this to work with Tomcat alone first, then worrying about Apache. John David Wynter wrote: Hi, Thanks for the example. One final thing is puzzling me. I have 2 webapps under my domain so if I use this DocumentRoot /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname1 How do I then reach the second webappname2? Ideally I want to have www.stpenable.com hit www.stpenable.com/se/servlet/se/templates/index.vm and have www.stpenable.com/rwt hit www.stpenable.com/rwtransform/servlet/rwtransform/templates/index.vm i.e. in httpd.conf VirtualHost * ServerName www.stpenable.com ServerAlias localhost Alias /se /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/se DocumentRoot /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/se Directory /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/se Options Indexes FollowSymLinks DirectoryIndex index.vm index.html /Directory Location /WEB-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location Location /META-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location JkMount /* ajp13 Alias /rwtransform /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/rwtransform Directory /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/rwtransform Options Indexes FollowSymLinks DirectoryIndex index.vm index.html /Directory ?? /VirtualHost In my Host section of the server.xml I have 2 Contexts one with path=/ pointing to docBase=/se and one with path=/rwtransform and docBase=/rwtransform. With the DocumentRoot pointing at the specific webapp se I cannot see how I can have a JkMount that effectively looks like ../rwtransform/*? thanks David -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 August 2003 18:07 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: 2 VirtualHosts now work, mod_jk not I would try setting: Alias /webappname /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname DocumentRoot /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname Then: JkMount /servlet/* ajp13 Then your URL of http://some.host.com//webappname/servlet/webappname/templates/index.vm should work. Even this should work: Alias / /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname DocumentRoot /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname JkMount /*.vm ajp13 The * in this case means /webappname/servlet/webappname/templates. I don't know anything about Turbine, so I can't help with specifics. You might just be better off using Tomcat alone. John David Wynter wrote: I have long URLs because I am using the Apache Turbine project to develop my webapps. Here is an article on how to shorten them, which gives me the impression that i am stuck with these long URLs http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.2.1/howto/url-rewritin g-howto.ht ml unless I follow this method. This URL is a standard Turbine app URL - /webappname/servlet/webappname/templates/index.vm . It always seemed to me that the /webappname/servlet/webappname should be replaceable by Aliases, but it is not clear to me how. The web.xml supplied with Turbine does not have a mapping to .vm files. Here it is. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? !DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.2//EN http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-app_2.2.dtd; web-app servlet servlet-namese/servlet-name servlet-classorg.apache.turbine.Turbine/servlet-class init-param param-nameapplicationRoot/param-name param-valuewebContext/param-value /init-param init-param param-nameproperties/param-name param-value/WEB-INF/conf/TurbineResources.properties/param-value /init-param load-on-startup1/load-on-startup /servlet security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nametemplates/web-resource-name url-pattern/templates/*/url-pattern /web-resource-collection web-resource-collection web-resource-namelogs/web-resource-name url-pattern/logs/*/url-pattern /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-nameadmin/role-name /auth-constraint /security-constraint login-config auth-methodBASIC/auth-method realm-nameTemplates/realm-name /login-config /web-app What is not clear is how the JkMount works in the context of the long URLs for Turbine
Re: Dynamically update server.xml httpd.conf
Tomcat 4 = no Tomcat 5 = I believe so Apache = yes ($APACHE_HOME/bin/apachectl graceful OR $APACHE_HOME/bin/apachectl restart) John Lars Nielsen Lind wrote: Hi. Is it possible to update and implement changes in server.xml and httpd.conf while Apache/Tomcat is running? I want to be able to add 'sites' to my server without restarting Apache/Tomcat. Are there other solutions? Lars Nielsen Lind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dynamically update server.xml httpd.conf
Yep, its a restart. If you use restart then all open connections will be dropped. If you use graceful, Apache will block new requests, and wait until all open connections are closed before restarting. So yes should probably be maybe. :) John Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, Apache = yes ($APACHE_HOME/bin/apachectl graceful OR $APACHE_HOME/bin/apachectl restart) But doesn't this do an apache restart, i.e. doesn't swap the changes in-memory? Of course, the apache restart is so quick it might not matter ;) Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which mod_jk to install?
Hi - If you have Apache 1.3 and your Apache has mod_ssl installed, you want EAPI. If no mod_ssl, then no EAPI. If Apache 2, then neither, use the mod_jk for Apache 2. The binary should be fine. HTH John Denise Mangano wrote: Hi all.. Its been a while since I've posted... I'm in a pretty big bind right now, and I remembered how helpful everyone was here, so I thought I'd post as I begin my mod_jk venture. (Have to rebuild entire server by tomorrow )... To start, I finally finished rebuilding a RH 7.3 box with Apache 1.3.28 and Tomcat 4.1.27. Both are working just as they should. I'm anticipating the trouble I'm going to have with mod_jk (had TONS last time), so I'm trying to minimize the pain by asking ahead of time which mod_jk version I should install - I'm guessing mod_jk-1.2.4? Then the next question would be do I want to compile from source or is using the binary ok? Lastly, if the binary is ok, do I want mod_jk-1.2.4.so or the mod_jk.1.4.0-eapi.so? Thanks for your help :) Denise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ Apache / Tomcat ]
Dan McCullough wrote: I have not ever had any problems doing Tomcat/Apache/JDBC/MySQL/SSL, except these last few times at it has been problems with corupt downloads and incompatible mod_jk, and its a pain trying to find any mod_jk. So if you find it make sure it is compatiable with your version of Apache, or it wont work. BTW has anyone seen the verison for Apache 2.0.40? You have to build it from source. The only binaries you will find on the Jakarta site are binaries built against standard Apache distributions. Red Hat's Apache says it is 2.0.40 but it is not...what it really means is that it is 2.0.40 with patches applied from later releases that RH feels are needed. RH does not update the version number, nor can you be really sure that they've applied the fixes (.41 through .47) correctly. Thus, Apache 2.0.40 in a Red Hat context equals Our version of Apache which we call 2.0.40 which may or may not be equal to any other standard Apache distribution. I think you'd have to install the httpd-source RPM and diff it against the Apache 2.0.47 source to really figure out what's different or if they are identical. I don't know of anyone who has done that...it's much easier to just download Apache and build it...takes about 90 seconds on a P3. So, the answer to your question: build it from source. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ Apache / Tomcat ]
The HOWTO will work for all versions of Red Hat (and probably any other Linux). The only gotcha is getting the correct mod_jk.so binary. Everything else is the same as far as I can tell. John Michele Neylon:: Blacknight Solutions wrote: Which version of Apache? Which OS? If it's RH with 1.3* have a look at John Turner's howto: http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html M Mr. Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions http://www.blacknightsolutions.com # This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete this message immediately. Disclosure, copying or other action taken in respect of this email or in reliance to it is prohibited. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Quickly get Tomcat running with Apache on Solaris?
Glad you got it working. Incidentally, GNU tar handles all of the GNU software and is 100% compatible with any other archive, even those built using Solaris tar. So, you can avoid this in the future by making sure your path brings in GNU tar ahead of Solaris tar by default. You won't have any problems then and won't notice any difference. John Jim Chase wrote: Bingo. I must admint I doubted you John. But you were right. I untarred it with GNU tar and it worked immediately. Thanks! Jim --- John Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't use Solaris tar to unpack GNU software. GNU software requires GNU tar. GNU tar and Solaris tar are incompatible. Tomcat is a Java application. A binary Java application is a binary for ALL operating systems, there are no distinctions. Did you download and install the JDK? The easiest way to get Tomcat running on Solaris is: 1. download and install the JDK 2. set JAVA_HOME to the location of the JDK from step #1 3. download the Tomcat binary 4. unpack it to /usr/local 5. set CATALINA_HOME to location of Tomcat (something like /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27 or /usr/local/tomcat if you're clever and used ln to link /usr/local/tomcat to /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27) 6. execute $CATALINA_HOME/bin/startup.sh 7. view http://localhost:8080 John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 VirtualHosts working other stuff not
David Wynter wrote: So if I have a Context path= docBase=/usr/local/jakarata-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/se / DocumentRoot should be /usr/local/jakarata-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/se. If this case then what about the other webapp in /usr/local/jakarata-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/rwtransform how will I get to that? I wasn't aware that you wanted two separate webapps on the same Virtual Host. I'm honestly not sure how I can be more clear. My ultimate suggestion for you is to get AWAY from using absolute paths. My second suggestion for you is get it working with Tomcat first, no Apache. Then worry about Apache. In your configuration, as I understand it, the DocumentRoot in httpd.conf would be equal to your server.xml Host's appBase. Then, you would access your webapps like: http://my.host.com/webapp1 http://my.host.com/webapp2 and your homepage would be http://my.host.com/index.html John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reg: Connector or Apache and Tomcat
Tomcat is perfectly capable of serving HTML documents. Set up a Host in server.xml, and in that Host set up a Context to handle your static content. If you're not using Apache now, there's no reason to use it in the future just for serving static files. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I am running a few struts-based webapp using tomcat. I access them using www.xyz.org/webappA, www.xyz.org/webappB, www.xyz.org/webappC. We have an old website consisting of static html. we want to merge this old website to the tomcat. The old webiste had stuff something in this format www.old.org/ModA, www.old.org/ModB, www.old.ModC etc..I would like it to be so that i can all the entire content from one IP like www.xyz.org/webappA,www.xyz,org/webappB, www/xyz.org/modA(static HTML module), www.xyz.org/modB(static HTML module. Plz. let me know how i can do this. I dont even know if i should use connectors for this. I am not getting any resources on this plz. help me Thank you Mohan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: default apps for tomcat + apache
Try /*.jsp, not */*.jsp. I'm surprised the latter ever worked at all. John lcl wrote: Hi all here , I have integrated tomcat4.1.27 and apache2.0.47 using mod_jk2, and work fine, because I have set my apps souko as the default apps in tomcat, and I want so in apache, so I define the following uri in workers2.properties [uri:*/*] .. it is ok, because I can access the souko from the url : http://localhost/ , but Now, when I want only redirect jsp or servlet request to tomcat and apache will response for all static pages, so I want to change the uri to : [uri:*/*.jsp] but it can not work! Could you give me any instruments to do so ? Thank you very much. Appreciate for any help. lichunlin China - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Folder Permissions taken over by Tomcat 4
You're saying Tomcat runs around and changes the directory permissions? I find that really hard to believe...I'm running Tomcat 3.1, 4.1.12, 4.1.18, and 4.1.27 in various places and have never seen this behavior. John Hertenstein Alain wrote: Hello, We have a Red Hat Linux 7.2 Server with Tomcat v4.0.3 installed, and a web application configured, let's say myApps. In this webapps/myApps folder, there are folders which we have shared through SMB so that Windows users can access them, and we have also changed the folder's permissions, so that these users can modify their contents. Everything works fine. The problem here is when we have to restart Tomcat 4, all permissions under that webapps/myApps folder are restored this way - User : Tomcat 4, Group : Tomcat 4. So this means that all our permissions settings are cleared ! And we have to set them back again each time we restart Tomcat 4 (in case of a server reboot, or major application change, etc), which is quite annoying. Is there a way to avoid this ? Thank you very much Alain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 VirtualHosts same IP address and port on Tomcat not working
David Wynter wrote: Hi, It seems that the second VirtualHost I have set up for my second domain name is not paasing the requests through mod_jk to Tomcat. It is not even clear that you can support 2 virtualhosts for different domains with the same IP address and port 80. This is a separate problem to the www.stpenable.com not redirecting to www.stpenable.com/se/servlet/se/templates/index.vm but it still affects me. You can support many virtual hosts on the same IP address. I have production environments with 6, 9, and 12 virtual hosts working just fine. Is the only way I can support a second virtual host is by setting up a second Service with its own Engine and Ajp13 connector listening on a separate port (say 8007 instead of 8009?). I assume I then setup a second worker on the port I have introduced. And in this case do both sevices also have a listener for port 8080, or do I need one on that port at all since all my trafic will be on port 80? No, this is incorrect. You only need one Service. Your problems are related to your httpd.conf file, not the connector and not Tomcat. You have to instruct Apache appropriately. Its more than just JkMount, you also have to get your Alias and your DocumentRoot directives correct in httpd.conf...getting them wrong will cause Apache to miss the mod_jk match. I just tried it without a listener on port 8080, and a service with a connector on 8007 for one virtual host and a separate service with connector on 8009 for the other, nothing worked, so I suppose that answers my question. I am kinda surprised that on the whole internet there is not a configuration example of running different webapps on 2 domains on the same Tomcat instance, there must be hundreds of people doing it? There are. I've posted an example to this list twice in the past 4 months or so. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 VirtualHosts same IP address and port on Tomcat not working
Advice: Forget about servlets. Forget about serving all content from a servlet. Too many variables, causing you too much confusion. Take it one step at a time. First: set up Tomcat so that you have 2 virtual hosts. Each virtual host needs a SEPARATE appBase. If BOTH virtual hosts are to be IDENTICAL, then DON'T use a separate Host node for the second one (or a separate appBase), instead set up one Host node and use the Alias directive in server.xml to alias the second hostname to the first. Second: Create your Contexts. Root, subdir, whatever, set it up as you plan to use them in your URLs. Third: Create a SIMPLE JSP, like hello world or whatever. Put that in the appropriate Context. Stop Tomcat. Delete EVERYTHING in the work directory (but not the work directory itself). Start Tomcat. Fourth: Verify that http://host1:8080/yourContext1/yourSimple.jsp works as expected. Fifth: Verify that http://host2:8080/yourContext2/yourSimple.jsp works as expected. Then, and only then, worry about Apache. If you get to this step, then you know Tomcat is OK and your problems are Apache related. Right now you are fudging with both ends of the equation, and being wrong in either or both can make the whole thing fall apart with zero indication of which end is causing the problem. Sixth: create a VirtualHost in httpd.conf. Set the DocumentRoot to be equal to the Context in server.xml. Thus, everything you do from that point on in your app has to be relative to the webapp root and URLs for static and dynamic content will be the same. Seventh: Setup your JkMount. If your DocumentRoot is set correctly, and your Contexts are set correctly, you should be able to get what you want with: JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /servlet/* ajp13 assuming your servlets are in /servlet. You might also want to consider putting an extension on your servlets, as in Struts, like *.do or something. This makes JkMount even easier. This is only for testing. Once you have it working, and you want to generate everything with a servlet, then change your JkMount to /*. John David Wynter wrote: Hi, I have read dozens of archived posts on virtualhost. I have distilled my httpd.conf and server.xml back to what seems to be the recommended approach, see below. But now I can see no sites on any URL. I have a suspicous End event threw exception in the catalina.out log, which suggests a problem with server.xml, but reading it I cannot see any illegal XML, so assume it is a configuration value error. At the end of the exception it also has ...IllegalArguementException: Servlet mapping specifies an unknown servlet name rwsite which suggests it doesn't like my second Host configuration. But I copied and pasted it from a posted version that worked and just changed the appBase and servername to appropriate values? In my error_log I get 2 types of errors: 1. Directory Index forbidden by rule: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp1/rwsite - there is that same troublesome rwsite again. 2. File does not exist: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp1/rwsite/servlet it's not a file but a directory? and I get File does not exist: /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/se/servlet, referer: http://www.stpenable.com/se/servlet/se/template/solutions%2Cmdmanage.vm; which is real. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 VirtualHosts now work, mod_jk not
David Wynter wrote: Now I am getting somewhere. I had left out the Directory directives in httpd.conf in my previous post because I had editted it from the Tomcat site vhost example, one that had a global directive, not for each VirtualHost. I found that the web.xml file for the rwsite ahd a different servlet name and thus the catalina.out error. Now I use a index.html in each of the webapp directories (/se, /rwtransform /rwsite) in each it has a body onload=location='http://www.domainname.com:8080/webappname/servlet/webappna me/templates/index.vm'; This overcomes the lack of mod_jk working. I'd still like to do away with this redirect if I can. Any pointers? I have a feeling it is something to do with the JkMount directives, which are redirect everything to Tomcat from nmy understanding. I have no idea why you are trying to do this. This isn't necessary at all. Do you understand that your httpd.conf is confused? You have a URL like: /webappname/servlet/webappname/templates/index.vm when it should be: /webappname/servlet/templates/index.vm or even better: /webappname/index.vm Then you just need to map *.vm in web.xml to your servlet, and your JkMount would be: /webappname/*.vm ajp13 JkMount /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/webapp2/se/* ajp13 This is major confusion for mod_jk. Location /rwtransform/WEB-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location Location /rwtransform/META-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location Ditto...this should be something like /META-INF not /someDir/META-INF. the purpose of Alias and DocumentRoot is to get you away from using absolute paths in places like Location and JkMount. I get the feeling no one is reading these, but hopefully some other poor soul will find this helpful in the archives. Are you serious? Say the word and I'll stop all this typing. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to apply the hotfix of 4.1.27?
Huh? 4.1.27 is a separate distribution. What do you mean by why isn't there a new build? Just download it. John Vernon Smith wrote: Is the only way to apply the patch by the following procedure: 1. unzip the jar file * 2. replace the class in the hotfix 3. zip into the jar file ago. * which one of the three jar files is the jar file? Any better way to get it done? And why don't get a new build with the fix? v. Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: two ports with apj13
Hi - AJP13 doesn't do SSL. You set up multiple ports for a Tomcat Connector in server.xml. Copy the one that is already there (CoyoteConnector on port 8009) and change the port number to whatever you want. Workers.properties: # BEGIN workers.properties worker.list=ajp13 worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=localhost worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 # END workers.properties A doc that describes setting up more than one worker is here: http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat/ If you want to use SSL, you set this up in Apache...there is no Tomcat setup if you are using Apache with a connector. Communications between Apache and Tomcat via mod_jk or mod_jk2 are in the clear, that is, sans SSL. John Shannon Scott wrote: Hello, How do I set up my workers.properties so the apj13 protocol can listen on more than one port? I want to set it up for 8443 for ssl. Where is the doc describing hwo to set up the workers.properties? Apache 1.3.27 mod_jk Tomcat 4.1.24 Thank You. Shannon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 VirtualHosts same IP address and port on Tomcat not working
For grins, I decided to setup an example. Here it is. The server has multiple virtual hosts. There are currently 6 working, this configuration describes how I added a seventh by copying a config from one of the other 6 and changing values as needed. The scenario: One Tomcat instance (4.1.12, yes I know its old but its an internal play server so not that important) Multi-virtual hosts, each one has its own appBase ($CATALINA_HOME/hostname). Each virtual host has a root context ($CATALINA_HOME/hostname/hostname). Apache 2, mod_jk.so. The goal: http://hostname/test.jsp works http://hostname/test.html works To setup the new virtual host, I did the following: - in server.xml, added: Host name=www.DOMAIN.com debug=1 appBase=DOMAIN unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=DOMAIN_com. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=DOMAIN debug=0 reloadable=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=DOMAIN. suffix=.log timestamp=true / Resource name=mail/Session auth=Container type=javax.mail.Session/ ResourceParams name=mail/Session parameter namemail.smtp.host/name valuelocalhost/value /parameter /ResourceParams /Context /Host - created $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN, $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN/DOMAIN, $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN/DOMAIN/WEB-INF, $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN/DOMAIN/WEB-INF/classes, $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN/DOMAIN/WEB-INF/lib, $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN/DOMAIN/WEB-INF/web.xml where $CATALINA_HOME = /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12 - chown -R tomcat:tomcat $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN - created $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN/DOMAIN/test.html and $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN/DOMAIN/test.jsp in Apache httpd.conf, added: VirtualHost * ServerName www.DOMAIN.com DocumentRoot /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/DOMAIN/DOMAIN # Static files Alias / /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/DOMAIN/DOMAIN Directory /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12/DOMAIN/DOMAIN Options Indexes FollowSymLinks DirectoryIndex index.jsp /Directory # Deny direct access to WEB-INF and META-INF # Location /WEB-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location Location /META-INF/* AllowOverride None deny from all /Location JkMount /* ajp13 /VirtualHost - stopped Tomcat. stopped Apache. Removed contents of $CATALINA_HOME/work/Standalone. Started Tomcat. Started Apache. - verified that http://www.DOMAIN.com/test.jsp and http://www.DOMAIN.com/test.html work, and that http://www.DOMAIN.com/WEB-INF/web.xml returns a 403. Wherever you see DOMAIN in the above, substitute the domain name that you want to use, or anything else, as long as you stay consistent. I decided to use a JkMount of /* only because that's what you said you wanted to do by having a servlet generate all content...I could have just as easily made the JkMount be /*.jsp or whatever. Your servlets now go in $CATALINA_HOME/DOMAIN/DOMAIN/WEB-INF, and you can adjust your web.xml appropriately to map them to a URL starting with / as in http://www.DOMAIN.com/SERVLET-URL. Thus, things like /WEB-INF in the Location directive are RELATIVE to things like Alias, as is JkMount..if you get Alias wrong (and/or DocumentRoot) you're going to have lots of problems, and messing with your Contexts in server.xml or putting strange onLoad Javascript redirects in your pages isn't going to make it any better. I'm not sure how much clearer I can be than the above, but I am always open to suggestions/corrections. HTH John David Wynter wrote: Hi, It seems that the second VirtualHost I have set up for my second domain name is not paasing the requests through mod_jk to Tomcat. It is not even clear that you can support 2 virtualhosts for different domains with the same IP address and port 80. This is a separate problem to the www.stpenable.com not redirecting to www.stpenable.com/se/servlet/se/templates/index.vm but it still affects me. Is the only way I can support a second virtual host is by setting up a second Service with its own Engine and Ajp13 connector listening on a separate port (say 8007 instead of 8009?). I assume I then setup a second worker on the port I have introduced. And in this case do both sevices also have a listener for port 8080, or do I need one on that port at all since all my trafic will be on port 80? I just tried it without a listener on port 8080, and a service with a connector on 8007 for one virtual host and a separate service with connector on 8009 for the other, nothing worked, so I suppose that answers my question. I am kinda surprised that on the whole internet there is not a configuration example of running different webapps on 2 domains on the same Tomcat instance, there must be hundreds of people doing it? Thanks David -Original
Re: 2 VirtualHosts now work, mod_jk not
I would try setting: Alias /webappname /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname DocumentRoot /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname Then: JkMount /servlet/* ajp13 Then your URL of http://some.host.com//webappname/servlet/webappname/templates/index.vm should work. Even this should work: Alias / /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname DocumentRoot /some/path/to/tomcat/webappname JkMount /*.vm ajp13 The * in this case means /webappname/servlet/webappname/templates. I don't know anything about Turbine, so I can't help with specifics. You might just be better off using Tomcat alone. John David Wynter wrote: I have long URLs because I am using the Apache Turbine project to develop my webapps. Here is an article on how to shorten them, which gives me the impression that i am stuck with these long URLs http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.2.1/howto/url-rewriting-howto.ht ml unless I follow this method. This URL is a standard Turbine app URL - /webappname/servlet/webappname/templates/index.vm . It always seemed to me that the /webappname/servlet/webappname should be replaceable by Aliases, but it is not clear to me how. The web.xml supplied with Turbine does not have a mapping to .vm files. Here it is. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? !DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.2//EN http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-app_2.2.dtd; web-app servlet servlet-namese/servlet-name servlet-classorg.apache.turbine.Turbine/servlet-class init-param param-nameapplicationRoot/param-name param-valuewebContext/param-value /init-param init-param param-nameproperties/param-name param-value/WEB-INF/conf/TurbineResources.properties/param-value /init-param load-on-startup1/load-on-startup /servlet security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nametemplates/web-resource-name url-pattern/templates/*/url-pattern /web-resource-collection web-resource-collection web-resource-namelogs/web-resource-name url-pattern/logs/*/url-pattern /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-nameadmin/role-name /auth-constraint /security-constraint login-config auth-methodBASIC/auth-method realm-nameTemplates/realm-name /login-config /web-app What is not clear is how the JkMount works in the context of the long URLs for Turbine apps as opposed to the short URLs for the example jsp. Why did I use the alias name in my Location and JkMount directives? Because the archive is littered with examples doing just that eg. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg98299 According to this thread the solution was not changing what he had in the JkMount so I cannot but help take it as an example, sorry. Thanks John, you are the only one who is replying to these. David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Folder Permissions taken over by Tomcat 4
I still don't believe it. The reason I don't believe it is simple: if I change the permissions in my Context or one of its subdirectories or files to something that prevents Tomcat from using the resources (JSP file or whatever), Tomcat does not change the permissions back to what it needs to work, instead my apps fail and throw errors like crazy. If Tomcat is doing what you say it is doing, I would never get errors, because Tomcat would just merrily go around and change permissions on resources so that it was happy, which is what you say it is doing. If anything, it isn't Tomcat that's doing it to you...if I had to guess, it would be samba or something on one of the Windows clients like some goofy tool Microsoft has like a fast indexer or some other munged up app (much more likely). John Hertenstein Alain wrote: Yes I do confirm it again (at least on Linux Red Hat 7.2, as long as the OS has anything to do with it). Ok I repeat : - have a web application configured on Tomcat 4.0.3, in a folder like webapps/myApps - share an application's sub-folder (f.ex. webapps/myApps/documents), and try to set permissions (read write) and ownership for specific user accounts which will access this sub-folder through SMB. - restart Tomcat 4 : all these permissions in the webapps/myApps/documents folder are gone. And furthermore, the folder's Ownership (maybe the problem lies here actually...) is set to user : tomcat4, and group : tomcat4 I can send screenshots if you don't believe this... Nobody heard of this before !? Alain -Message d'origine- De : John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi, 22. août 2003 14:40 À : Tomcat Users List Objet : Re: Folder Permissions taken over by Tomcat 4 You're saying Tomcat runs around and changes the directory permissions? I find that really hard to believe...I'm running Tomcat 3.1, 4.1.12, 4.1.18, and 4.1.27 in various places and have never seen this behavior. John Hertenstein Alain wrote: Hello, We have a Red Hat Linux 7.2 Server with Tomcat v4.0.3 installed, and a web application configured, let's say myApps. In this webapps/myApps folder, there are folders which we have shared through SMB so that Windows users can access them, and we have also changed the folder's permissions, so that these users can modify their contents. Everything works fine. The problem here is when we have to restart Tomcat 4, all permissions under that webapps/myApps folder are restored this way - User : Tomcat 4, Group : Tomcat 4. So this means that all our permissions settings are cleared ! And we have to set them back again each time we restart Tomcat 4 (in case of a server reboot, or major application change, etc), which is quite annoying. Is there a way to avoid this ? Thank you very much Alain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: newbie needs help - root context not working with apache
It's not working for a couple reasons, not least of which there is no servlet mapping in ROOT's web.xml file, and no entry for the default Invoker. Also, you haven't told us how you changed your JK2 properties file to match the new URL, that is, if you did so (you need to). Sooo...maybe you can repost with a little more detail about what it is that you want to do, what URL you want to use, etc. You might also consider not using Apache and JK2 at all...its not required. John Steve Veltman wrote: I am running Tomcat 4.1.27 with Apache 2.0.47, using the jk2 2.0.43 connector and j2sdk 1.4.2 I connected Tomcat to Apache using the instructions at http://www.gregoire.org/howto/Apache2_Jk2_TC4.1.x_JSDK1.4.x.html I can open localhost/examples/servlet/HelloWorldExample If I move HelloWorldExample.class into the ROOT contexts WEB-INF folder, I can open it using localhost:8080/servlet/Hello... but I cannot open it using localhost/servlet/Hello... The Tomcat Root Context section in server.xml has been uncommented, but that hasn't helped. I NEED this to work, but I really don't know how to get this new Tomcat version to do it. What am I missing? Can anyone point me to documentation where this is covered? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-Mail to CompuServe Customer Service
This list is automated, there is no human managing it. Filter = yes. Complain = no. John Kannan Sundararajan wrote: Normally there would be someone verifies the email before going inot users group.. But seems no one is verifying.. It is flooding already in my inbox.. -Original Message- From: Mike Curwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:33 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: E-Mail to CompuServe Customer Service Is this http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] tml ?? -Original Message- From: CompuServe Customer Service [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:27 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: E-Mail to CompuServe Customer Service - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-Mail to CompuServe Customer Service
You've obviously never read a Microsoft EULA. John Mark R. Diggory wrote: Typical Microsoft! Isn't it about time some of these companies that are complaining about loosing so much money to these virus' sued Microsoft for negligence. Really, if all these companies are loosing so much money to these downright stupid email exploits that a 6th grader could write, you'd think they'd be dragging MS into court all the time to recover their losses. -M. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: two ports with apj13
What do you mean by doesn't work? What happens? Whats the error message? John Shannon Scott wrote: John, Thank you much for responding. That is great news... I though with mod_jk the ssl was all handled by Apache. I have set up many virtual hosts... they all work except the https one. So I thought I needed to redirect those requests to another port with a connector that includes the: scheme=https secure=true parameters. My httpd.conf snip is below. Do you understand why it doesn't work? What could be wrong? Thanks again for your kind help. Shannon VirtualHost _default_:443 ErrorLog logs/ssl_error_log TransferLog logs/ssl_access_log Alias /ssl /var/tomcat4/webapps/ROOT/ssl JkMount /ssl/servlet/* ajp13 JkMount /ssl/*.jsp ajp13 SSL stuff... /VirtualHost - Original Message - From: John Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:26 AM Subject: Re: two ports with apj13 Hi - AJP13 doesn't do SSL. You set up multiple ports for a Tomcat Connector in server.xml. Copy the one that is already there (CoyoteConnector on port 8009) and change the port number to whatever you want. Workers.properties: # BEGIN workers.properties worker.list=ajp13 worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=localhost worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 # END workers.properties A doc that describes setting up more than one worker is here: http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat/ If you want to use SSL, you set this up in Apache...there is no Tomcat setup if you are using Apache with a connector. Communications between Apache and Tomcat via mod_jk or mod_jk2 are in the clear, that is, sans SSL. John Shannon Scott wrote: Hello, How do I set up my workers.properties so the apj13 protocol can listen on more than one port? I want to set it up for 8443 for ssl. Where is the doc describing hwo to set up the workers.properties? Apache 1.3.27 mod_jk Tomcat 4.1.24 Thank You. Shannon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache-Tomcat-Struts 404 Not Found
Yes, they do. AFAIK, if they are outside the VirtualHost block, they only apply to those requests NOT matched by a ServerName, which would not be the case in the example below. John James Harman wrote: Don't the JkMount lines need to be inside the VirtualHost tags? --- Johan Wasserman - CPX Mngd Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope, that didn't solve the problem. But let it be known that I'm not realy a guru when it comes to configuring this lot. Heres some extracts: httpd.conf- VirtualHost * ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ServerName localhost ErrorLog logs/local-error.log CustomLog logs/local-access.log common /VirtualHost VirtualHost * ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot C:\Apache\Tomcat 5.0\webapps\itdiv ServerName www.itdiv.com ErrorLog logs/www.itdiv.com-error.log CustomLog logs/www.itdiv.com-access.log common /VirtualHost ### Tomcat 5 Connector include C:/Apache/Tomcat 5.0/conf/mod_jk.conf mod_jk.conf- # JkMount /* ajp13 JkMount /*.do ajp13 JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 JkMount /servlet/* ajp13 http://localhost/struts-example/logon.do- results in a 404. http://localhost:8080/struts-example/logon.do - works! http://www.itdiv.com/logon.do - results in a 404. http://www.itdiv.com:8080/logon.do - works! Regards, and thanks. Johan. -Original Message- From: Johan Wasserman - CPX Mngd Services Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:42 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Apache-Tomcat-Struts 404 Not Found Thanks John, no I didn't. But I did have JkMount /* ajp13, wouldn't that do it? I'll try specifying it the way you suggest. Thanks again. Johan. -Original Message- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:30 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache-Tomcat-Struts 404 Not Found Tomcat 4 and Tomcat 5 configuration with mod_jk are the same. Do you have something like this in your httpd.conf file? JkMount /*.do ajp13 John Johan Wasserman - CPX Mngd Services wrote: Hi, I got Tomcat and Apache configured according to documentation (still referencing TC4x) I found on the web. It seemed to work fine but while testing struts I found that the actions (*do) resulted in a 404 Not found. When I test via Tomcat only (localhost:8080) it works fine. I have probably only been looking in the wrong places but cannot seem to find documentation or a download area for mod_jk to do a config on the following versions: Tomcat v. 5.0.3 Apache v. 2.0.46 So, my curent versions are configured using Tomcat v 4x documentation (and mod_jk). Have anyone done this successfully on the newer versions, and where can I download the required bin's and doc's? Thanks! Johan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Choose the Sprite when the Coke is placed before you... __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Starting tomcat from init scripts (HP/UX)
It's the former. The latter doesn't occur on this list in my experience. John Lott, Carey wrote: Since nobody has responded does this mean nobody has any more ideas on the problem or am I getting the You idiot. The answer is staring you in the face. silent treatment? If it is the latter, I will admit being an idiot if someone will enlighten me. If it is the former, I want to say thank you for the help I have received to this point because I am farther along then I was, and if I figure out a solution short of a cron entry I'll post it. Thanks again for the help. Carey -Original Message- From: Lott, Carey Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 11:18 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Starting tomcat from init scripts (HP/UX) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Quickly get Tomcat running with Apache on Solaris?
Don't use Solaris tar to unpack GNU software. GNU software requires GNU
tar. GNU tar and Solaris tar are incompatible.
Tomcat is a Java application. A binary Java application is a binary for
ALL operating systems, there are no distinctions.
Did you download and install the JDK?
The easiest way to get Tomcat running on Solaris is:
1. download and install the JDK
2. set JAVA_HOME to the location of the JDK from step #1
3. download the Tomcat binary
4. unpack it to /usr/local
5. set CATALINA_HOME to location of Tomcat (something like
/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27 or /usr/local/tomcat if you're clever
and used ln to link /usr/local/tomcat to /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.27)
6. execute $CATALINA_HOME/bin/startup.sh
7. view http://localhost:8080
John
Jim Chase wrote:
Solaris 9 has Apache and Tomcat loaded by default. I
got Apache running but Tomcat needed more work. So I
tried to download it from Jakarta at:
http://apache.oregonstate.edu/jakarta/tomcat-4/binaries/
I gunzipped it and un-tarred it. Then I did what it
said to do in the docs...
* Unpack the binary distribution into a convenient
location so that the
distribution resides in its own directory
(conventionally named
jakarta-tomcat-4.0). For the purposes of the
remainder of this document,
the symbolic name ${catalina.home} is used to refer
to the full
pathname of the release directory.
(2) Start Up Tomcat 4.0
There are two techniques by which Tomcat 4.0 can be
started:
* Via an environment variable:
- Set an environment variable CATALINA_HOME to the
path of the directory
into which you have installed Tomcat 4.0.
- Execute the shell command:
%CATALINA_HOME%\bin\startup (Windows)
$CATALINA_HOME/bin/startup.sh (Unix)
* By modifying your current working directory:
- Execute the following shell commands:
cd %CATALINA_HOME%\bin (Windows)
startup (Windows)
cd $CATALINA_HOME/bin (Unix)
./startup.sh(Unix)
NOW - It won't run. I'm not even sure it was a Solaris
Binary.
This is what I get in the catalina.out file:
$ cat catalina.out
Exception in thread main
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/catalina/startup/Bootstrap
Whats the easiest way to get Tomcat running with
Apache on Solaris 9?
Thanks!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
