date:20100318

Unfortunately, the session expired page still opens in a modal window...

Any further help will be appreciated.

Best,
Martin

-Original Message-
From: Martin Asenov [mailto:mase...@velti.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 6:34 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Prevent SessionExpiredPage from opening in a modal window

Thanks , Igor!

I did it that way:


head
script type=text/javascript
function checkIfParentIsModal() {
if (window.opener!=null) { window.opener.location=window.location; }
}
/script
/head

body onload=checkIfParentIsModal()/body

Hopefully that works!

Best,
Martin

-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 5:45 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Prevent SessionExpiredPage from opening in a modal window

you can add a bit of js to your custom pageexpiredpage, something that
looks like this:

if (window.opener!=null) { window.opener.location=window.location; }

-igor

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Martin Asenov mase...@velti.com wrote:
 Hello, guys!

 I'm, wondering if I could prevent my sessionExpiredPage from opening in a 
 modal window. In case the user opens a modal window and goes away for a while 
 and in the meantime the session gets expired, I don't want when he comes back 
 and clicks inside the modal window to see the session expired page with a 
 button 'Go to home page in the modal. Afterwards, of course, if he clicks on 
 the link he'll get home page shown inside the modal. I want to prevent this.

 Any hints or ideas?

 Best,
 Martin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-18 Thread Martin Grigorov

Here is how I understand wicketstuff hosting:

Someone makes something cool and decides to share it with the community.
Then this person asks in the mailing lists for commit permissions. After
that this person jumps into something else and don't have time to
support the project. Later on I need this cool feature and the first
place to look for it is wicketstuff.org (you know because of the
advertising in the mailing lists). Then I add or improve something to
this project and again share it with the community. After me someone
else does the same and the project lives. Otherwise some volunteer (like
Jeremy) decides that this project is not maintained and moves it to
attic.

About GoogleCode, github, bitbucket, ... yes, you can put your project
there. But there are two problems: 
1) it is less visible
it is not next to the other wicketstuff projects where everyone checks
first
2) when you don't have time to support it you need to give commit
permissions to the people who have time or they will start clone it all
over Internet. And this will just confuse further future
users/maintainers  

On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:25 -0400, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
 It sounds like whoever is responsible for wicketstuff needs to make a 
 clear choice here.
 
 Is Wicketstuff going to be maintained as a place where lots of useful 
 add-ons will live?  If so, it needs someone to take a slightly more 
 active role as curator; make sure the releases are done in parallel with 
 wicket releases, make sure modules don't get dumped there without at 
 least some documentation; and weed out modules that are abandoned, where 
 no one volunteers to take on maintenance, or whose function has been 
 absorbed into wicket's core.
 
 Alternatively, make it clear that wicketstuff is NOT going to be 
 maintained, and people like me who would like to share modules will 
 share them in some other way - on Google code, a personal website, or 
 whatever.
 
 Either way is ok I think, it just would be useful for those of us who 
 are interested in contributing modules to know.
 
 Thanks
 Bng
 
 
 Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
  Really, it should match what's at trunk of Wicket, which should be
  1.5-SNAPSHOT.  There should be a branch for 1.4.x that is 1.4-SNAPSHOT.
   But, nobody is really maintaining it any more, so it's a free-for-all.
   That's always been the problem with WicketStuff.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
  On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Boris Goldowsky bgoldow...@cast.orgwrote:
 

  The wicketstuff-core is calling itself version 1.4.2 in the HEAD of SVN.
  Shouldn't this be updated to 1.4.7 now to keep in sync with Wicket?
 
  Bng
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
  
 

 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-18 Thread nino martinez wael

Exactly (I wrote something similar, but it apparently was declared spam:().
We could of course improve our structure as always, lifting the level a bit.
As I see it wicketstuff are as ops4j, which brings advantages and
disadvantages as well.

-regards Nino

2010/3/18 Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bg

 Here is how I understand wicketstuff hosting:

 Someone makes something cool and decides to share it with the community.
 Then this person asks in the mailing lists for commit permissions. After
 that this person jumps into something else and don't have time to
 support the project. Later on I need this cool feature and the first
 place to look for it is wicketstuff.org (you know because of the
 advertising in the mailing lists). Then I add or improve something to
 this project and again share it with the community. After me someone
 else does the same and the project lives. Otherwise some volunteer (like
 Jeremy) decides that this project is not maintained and moves it to
 attic.

 About GoogleCode, github, bitbucket, ... yes, you can put your project
 there. But there are two problems:
 1) it is less visible
 it is not next to the other wicketstuff projects where everyone checks
 first
 2) when you don't have time to support it you need to give commit
 permissions to the people who have time or they will start clone it all
 over Internet. And this will just confuse further future
 users/maintainers

 On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:25 -0400, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
  It sounds like whoever is responsible for wicketstuff needs to make a
  clear choice here.
 
  Is Wicketstuff going to be maintained as a place where lots of useful
  add-ons will live?  If so, it needs someone to take a slightly more
  active role as curator; make sure the releases are done in parallel with
  wicket releases, make sure modules don't get dumped there without at
  least some documentation; and weed out modules that are abandoned, where
  no one volunteers to take on maintenance, or whose function has been
  absorbed into wicket's core.
 
  Alternatively, make it clear that wicketstuff is NOT going to be
  maintained, and people like me who would like to share modules will
  share them in some other way - on Google code, a personal website, or
  whatever.
 
  Either way is ok I think, it just would be useful for those of us who
  are interested in contributing modules to know.
 
  Thanks
  Bng
 
 
  Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
   Really, it should match what's at trunk of Wicket, which should be
   1.5-SNAPSHOT.  There should be a branch for 1.4.x that is 1.4-SNAPSHOT.
But, nobody is really maintaining it any more, so it's a free-for-all.
That's always been the problem with WicketStuff.
  
   --
   Jeremy Thomerson
   http://www.wickettraining.com
  
  
  
   On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Boris Goldowsky bgoldow...@cast.org
 wrote:
  
  
   The wicketstuff-core is calling itself version 1.4.2 in the HEAD of
 SVN.
   Shouldn't this be updated to 1.4.7 now to keep in sync with Wicket?
  
   Bng
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
  
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: HttpsRequestCycleProcessor not immediately redirecting to https

2010-03-18 Thread Gianni

Apologies, I now see it's exactly the same problem as described here:
http://old.nabble.com/%40RequireHttps---forms-misbehaving-ts26845496.html

I can reproduce this in a quickstart, I just want to check before creating a 
jira:
- In my quickstart I'm calling setRedirect(true) within the form submit 
button's onSubmit(), is this the correct place to force a redirect?
- SignInPage has the @RequireHttps annotation, *should* the code below result 
in immediate redirection to the https page or am I missing something?

Button submitButton = new Button(submit) {
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
setRedirect(true);
setResponsePage(new SignInPage());
}
};

-Gianni


On 17/mar/2010, at 10.13, Gianni wrote:

 As part of a product purchase workflow I require users to sign-in or register 
 a new account in order to continue.
 In my purchase page I'm checking if the user is already signed-in and if not 
 I send them to a SignInOrRegisterPage which has the @RequireHttps annotation.
 
 BookingPage dest = new BookingPage(product);
 if (signedIn) {
   setResponsePage(dest);
 } else {
   session.getDefaultPageMap().put(dest);
   PageReference destPageRef = dest.getPageReference();
   setResponsePage(new SignInOrRegisterPage(destPageRef));
 }
 
 @RequireHttps
 public class SignInOrRegisterPage extends StandardBasePage {
private PageReference destination;
 
public SignInOrRegisterPage(PageReference finalDest) {
 ..
 
 In MyApplication:
 @Override
protected IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor() {
HttpsConfig config = new 
 HttpsConfig(MyApplication.get().getHttpPort(), 
 MyApplication.get().getHttpsPort());
return new HttpsRequestCycleProcessor(config) {
@Override
protected IRequestCodingStrategy newRequestCodingStrategy() {
return new CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy(new 
 WebRequestCodingStrategy());
}
};
}
 
 
 The initial redirection to SignInOrRegisterPage does not go to https, only 
 when I submit the form on the http SignInOrRegisterPage does it then redirect 
 to https.
 Any ideas why it's not going immediately to https?
 Thanks
 Gianni
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

wicket-contrib-javaee: @EJB injection - injecting always the same instance regardless of session

2010-03-18 Thread Christian Reiter


Hi!

I've just started using the @EJB injection annotation from 
wicket-contrib-javaee.
I use it to inject a Stateful Session Bean to keep track of my user 
session and do some

stuff like authorization.

I thought the @EJB annotation keeps track of my sessions and would 
inject a unique instance of

the Stateful Session Bean for each of my Wicket session.

But, it injects always the same Stateful Session Bean instance 
completely ignoring my Wicket sessions. In this case it is useless to 
keep track of my users.


Am i doing anything wrong or is this the intended behaviour?

Would it be better to get the Stateful Session Bean by a lookup call and 
then store it in the

Wicket session?

Thanks for your help!

Best Regards,
 christian

--
Christian Reiter|||c.rei...@gmx.net


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: wicket-contrib-javaee: @EJB injection - injecting always the same instance regardless of session

2010-03-18 Thread Major Péter

Hi,

At first thought, please try your code out with wicketstuff
javaee-inject, but it will most likely behave just the same.
You cannot store your bean in session, because AFAIK they're not
serializable.
Please rise an issue for this (also quickstart would be great), and I
will look into it.

Best Regards,
Peter Major

2010-03-18 10:07 keltezéssel, Christian Reiter írta:
 Hi!
 
 I've just started using the @EJB injection annotation from
 wicket-contrib-javaee.
 I use it to inject a Stateful Session Bean to keep track of my user
 session and do some
 stuff like authorization.
 
 I thought the @EJB annotation keeps track of my sessions and would
 inject a unique instance of
 the Stateful Session Bean for each of my Wicket session.
 
 But, it injects always the same Stateful Session Bean instance
 completely ignoring my Wicket sessions. In this case it is useless to
 keep track of my users.
 
 Am i doing anything wrong or is this the intended behaviour?
 
 Would it be better to get the Stateful Session Bean by a lookup call and
 then store it in the
 Wicket session?
 
 Thanks for your help!
 
 Best Regards,
 christian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: Prevent SessionExpiredPage from opening in a modal window

I have an idea: in my every modal dialog will put a listener that checks if 
session.isExpired() on user interaction with the modal window. 

Can someone tell me please what's the event fired when a user makes some action 
on a page, like clicking a link or a button. I want to listen for this.

Best,
Martin

-Original Message-
From: Martin Asenov [mailto:mase...@velti.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:02 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Prevent SessionExpiredPage from opening in a modal window

Unfortunately, the session expired page still opens in a modal window...

Any further help will be appreciated.

Best,
Martin

-Original Message-
From: Martin Asenov [mailto:mase...@velti.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 6:34 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Prevent SessionExpiredPage from opening in a modal window

Thanks , Igor!

I did it that way:


head
script type=text/javascript
function checkIfParentIsModal() {
if (window.opener!=null) { window.opener.location=window.location; }
}
/script
/head

body onload=checkIfParentIsModal()/body

Hopefully that works!

Best,
Martin

-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 5:45 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Prevent SessionExpiredPage from opening in a modal window

you can add a bit of js to your custom pageexpiredpage, something that
looks like this:

if (window.opener!=null) { window.opener.location=window.location; }

-igor

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Martin Asenov mase...@velti.com wrote:
 Hello, guys!

 I'm, wondering if I could prevent my sessionExpiredPage from opening in a 
 modal window. In case the user opens a modal window and goes away for a while 
 and in the meantime the session gets expired, I don't want when he comes back 
 and clicks inside the modal window to see the session expired page with a 
 button 'Go to home page in the modal. Afterwards, of course, if he clicks on 
 the link he'll get home page shown inside the modal. I want to prevent this.

 Any hints or ideas?

 Best,
 Martin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: RE: RE: Regarding TreeTable Horizontal Scrollbar

2010-03-18 Thread Leo . Erlandsson

 Anyone knows how to get the TreeTable Horizontal Scrollbar? If possible 
share the code snippet.
 Regards
 Vikash


Didn't you find any CSS Examples using Google?

This really is not a Wicket question, but a CSS question. However, I did a 
CSS Example for you.
Is this what you're looking for (click URL to see image)?

http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/1294/wicketscrollingtreetabl.jpg

It's all CSS. I took the Wicket TreeTable Example and added the following 
CSS (quick and dirty, there are more ways).
The magic is the CSS overflow-x: scroll;

wicket:head
style

div.my-tree  {
height: 20em;
width:1500px;
}

div.c {
width:1250px;
overflow-x: scroll;
}
/style
/wicket:head

wicket:extend
div class=c
div wicket:id=treeTable class=my-tree
/div
/div
/wicket:extend

using IBehaviorListener

Hello, guys!

I'm experiencing troubles with implementing IBehaviorListener on a ModalWindow.

I want to detect every single user interaction with to components inside the 
modal window and the close button itself , as well.

Would you give me some hints?

Best,
Martin

Re: A question about using Spring in Wicket 1.4

2010-03-18 Thread Gwyn Evans

Fixed the Javadoc in 1.4.x  trunk.  Thanks for reporting.
/Gwyn

On 11 March 2010 14:14, David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com wrote:

 James, thanks for quick reply. I guess I am a little confused is that in
 the init method, I use

 addComponentInstantiationListener(new SpringComponentInjector(this));

 instead of

 add(new SpringComponentInjector(this));

 as Migrating guide specified. The Guide-specified approach actually
 generates compiler error.

 Regards.


 --- On Thu, 3/11/10, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:

  From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
  Subject: Re: A question about using Spring in Wicket 1.4
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 9:09 AM
  yes
 
  On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:56 AM, David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com
  wrote:
   Yesterday I was looking at the page Migrating to
  Wicket 1.4
  
   http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrating-to-wicket-14.html
  
   Regarding SpringWebApplication, it says:
  
   SpringWebApplication has been deprecated in favor of
  SpringBean annotation. See SpringWebApplication javadoc for
  how to setup SpringBean based injection.
  
   I went to Wicket API about SpringWebApplication and it
  says:
  
   Deprecated. when using java5 it is preferrable to use
  SpringBean annotations for injection rather then this
  spring-specific application subclass with its helpers. To
  setup SpringBean add the following line to your
  WebApplication subclass init method add(new
  SpringComponentInjector(this));
  
   Here is my way of using Spring in my wicket app.
  
   1. In the init method:
  
   addComponentInstantiationListener(new
  SpringComponentInjector(this));
  
   Please note that it is not: add(new
  SpringComponentInjector(this));
  
   2. In wicket components that access Spring beans:
  
   @SpringBean
   private SupportService supportService;
  
  
   Am I doing Spring in Wicket right way?
  
   Thanks for input!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: URL coding strategies

2010-03-18 Thread bgooren


You cannot have a seo-friendly url _and_ pass objects. If you want to pass an
object to another page (say a Product), then you need to create a
constructor on the target page which accepts a Product or an
IModelProduct. You can then call setResponsePage( new TargetPage( product
) ); The upside is that you only query the database once for the product,
but the url is not seo-friendly.


vp143 wrote:
 
 Hi there, I have a question about URL coding strategies
 
  
 
 I have decided to use IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy for friendly URL's.
 
  
 
 I have set PageParameters for this strategy in the following way:
 
  
 
 PageParameters pageParameters = new PageParameters();
 
 pageParameters.add(0, categoryName);
 
 pageParameters.add(1, productName);
 
  
 
 I have then created a Bookmarkable link like the following:
 
 Link viewItem = new BookmarkablePageLink(viewItem, ProductInfo.class,
 pageParameters);
 
  
 
 What I really want to do is pass the Product object to the ProductInfo
 class
 without it being visible in the URL. 
 
 I would rather not have to query the database for data object that I
 already
 have.
 
 How can this be achieved?
 
  
 
 Many thanks in advance.
 
  
 
 Regards
 
 Vishal
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/URL-coding-strategies-tp27939290p27944464.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

V1.4 Decision

2010-03-18 Thread karmienm

Hi

I have a general question, we are at the verge of starting a big, newish
project, with potentially many developers on Wicket and we need to
decide which version to base it on. The obvious choice is to choose
v1.4.x (latest) but we need Enterprise type components (like Security)
in the development, which many still are 1.3 based. What would you
recommend?

Thanks
Karmien



Important Notice:
 
Absa is an Authorised Financial Services Provider and Registered Credit 
Provider, 
registration number: NCRCP7.
 
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for 
the use of 
the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
 
Please note that there are terms and conditions and some important 
restrictions, 
qualifications and disclaimers (the Disclaimer) that apply to this email. To 
read this 
click on the following address or copy into your Internet browser:
 
http://www.absa.co.za/disclaimer
 
The Disclaimer forms part of the content of this email in terms of 
section 11 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions 
Act, 25 of 2002.
 
If you are unable to access the Disclaimer, send a blank e-mail 
to disclai...@absa.co.za and we will send you a copy of the 
Disclaimer.

Re: V1.4 Decision


Hi Karmien

Wicket 1.3.X is not supported anymore as far as I know, so there will 
most probably be no more updates for it.
Go for 1.4, it's been around for very long and most components are 
updated to 1.4 in a breeze (given that you have access to their source 
code). If no models are involved, they might even continue to work 
without changes


Matt

On 2010-03-18 10:50, karmi...@absa.co.za wrote:

Hi

I have a general question, we are at the verge of starting a big, newish
project, with potentially many developers on Wicket and we need to
decide which version to base it on. The obvious choice is to choose
v1.4.x (latest) but we need Enterprise type components (like Security)
in the development, which many still are 1.3 based. What would you
recommend?

Thanks
Karmien





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Tree with invisible Nodes

2010-03-18 Thread Martin U

Hi Folks,

i've to implement a tree in which some node are exists under a parent node
but they should not be visible to the user in browser at all.

I tried to overwrite getChild from TreeNode. But it dont works for me. I
need this node existens either they are not visible because the tree is my
data(model)-holder too for further processing


Any Ideas?

Thanks a lot.

Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice


Hi, I am new in Wicket and am playing with different components. 

I have a two dropdown lists. One is a list of countries, required field, 
controlling another list of states/provinces via 
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior. 

The country list always has a blank (equivalent of Choose one) as the first 
option in the list. When I select different countries, the state/province list 
changes accordingly. However, when I change to the blank in the country list, 
the state list stops updating. I looked into it and found out that in this 
situation (required droopdown list) selecting blank makes Wicket issue a 
feedback message instead of calling AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate, 
which is what I want.

What can I do to make Wicket the way I want?

Thanks!






  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice


Hi

Have a look at DropDownChoice.setNullValid() and .setRequired()

Matt

On 2010-03-18 14:26, David Chang wrote:

Hi, I am new in Wicket and am playing with different components.

I have a two dropdown lists. One is a list of countries, required field, 
controlling another list of states/provinces via 
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.

The country list always has a blank (equivalent of Choose one) as the first 
option in the list. When I select different countries, the state/province list changes 
accordingly. However, when I change to the blank in the country list, the state list 
stops updating. I looked into it and found out that in this situation (required droopdown 
list) selecting blank makes Wicket issue a feedback message instead of calling 
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate, which is what I want.

What can I do to make Wicket the way I want?

Thanks!





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Make FeedbackPanel occupy zero space when having no messages?

Hello, I am playing with FeedbackPanel. I put it in a page like this:

div wicket:id=feedbackHolder /

I notice that when having no messages, it always take up some space.

How can I make FeedbackPanel occupy zero space when having no messages?

Wicket way? or CSS? 

Any help is really appreciated.

Regards.



  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Make FeedbackPanel occupy zero space when having no messages?


Hi

Just create your own FeedbackPanel subclass and add:

public boolean isVisible () {
return anyMessage();
}

Matt

On 2010-03-18 14:32, David Chang wrote:

Hello, I am playing with FeedbackPanel. I put it in a page like this:

div wicket:id=feedbackHolder /

I notice that when having no messages, it always take up some space.

How can I make FeedbackPanel occupy zero space when having no messages?

Wicket way? or CSS?

Any help is really appreciated.





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice

Matt, I already did that.

DropDownChoice.setNullValid() makes Choose one always stay there.
I notice that DropDownChoice.setRequired() is the reason to generate the 
message and not get onUpdate called.

Thanks.


--- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch wrote:

 From: Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
 Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:30 AM
 Hi
 
 Have a look at DropDownChoice.setNullValid() and
 .setRequired()
 
 Matt
 
 On 2010-03-18 14:26, David Chang wrote:
  Hi, I am new in Wicket and am playing with different
 components.
 
  I have a two dropdown lists. One is a list of
 countries, required field, controlling another list of
 states/provinces via AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.
 
  The country list always has a blank (equivalent of
 Choose one) as the first option in the list. When I select
 different countries, the state/province list changes
 accordingly. However, when I change to the blank in the
 country list, the state list stops updating. I looked into
 it and found out that in this situation (required droopdown
 list) selecting blank makes Wicket issue a feedback message
 instead of calling
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate, which is what I
 want.
 
  What can I do to make Wicket the way I want?
 
  Thanks!
 
 
 


  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

SV: Make FeedbackPanel occupy zero space when having no messages?

2010-03-18 Thread Wilhelmsen Tor Iver

 How can I make FeedbackPanel occupy zero space when having no messages?

Override isVisible() to test if there are any messages to show, and call 
setOutputMarkupPlaceholder(true);

- Tor Iver

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice


Hi

Yes, exactly, but why do you have it set to required at all in first 
place if you want to allow the empty selection too?
I dont think a DropDownChoice is required by default but if it is, try  
setRequired(false) ...


Matt

On 2010-03-18 14:36, David Chang wrote:

Matt, I already did that.

DropDownChoice.setNullValid() makes Choose one always stay there.
I notice that DropDownChoice.setRequired() is the reason to generate the 
message and not get onUpdate called.

Thanks.


--- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch  wrote:

   

From: Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:30 AM
Hi

Have a look at DropDownChoice.setNullValid() and
.setRequired()

Matt

On 2010-03-18 14:26, David Chang wrote:
 

Hi, I am new in Wicket and am playing with different
   

components.
 

I have a two dropdown lists. One is a list of
   

countries, required field, controlling another list of
states/provinces via AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.
 

The country list always has a blank (equivalent of
   

Choose one) as the first option in the list. When I select
different countries, the state/province list changes
accordingly. However, when I change to the blank in the
country list, the state list stops updating. I looked into
it and found out that in this situation (required droopdown
list) selecting blank makes Wicket issue a feedback message
instead of calling
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate, which is what I
want.
 






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice

In my case, the field is required. I make it required by setRequired(true), but 
I want the blank/choose one is still there. 

Doable?

--- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch wrote:

 From: Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
 Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:42 AM
 Hi

 Yes, exactly, but why do you have it set to required at all
 in first 
 place if you want to allow the empty selection too?
 I dont think a DropDownChoice is required by default but if
 it is, try  
 setRequired(false) ...

 Matt

 On 2010-03-18 14:36, David Chang wrote:
  Matt, I already did that.

  DropDownChoice.setNullValid() makes Choose one
 always stay there.
  I notice that DropDownChoice.setRequired() is the
 reason to generate the message and not get onUpdate called.

  Thanks.

  --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch 
 wrote:

  From: Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
  Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required
 DropDownChoice
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:30 AM
  Hi

  Have a look at DropDownChoice.setNullValid() and
  .setRequired()

  Matt

  On 2010-03-18 14:26, David Chang wrote:

  Hi, I am new in Wicket and am playing with
 different

  components.

  I have a two dropdown lists. One is a list of

  countries, required field, controlling another
 list of
  states/provinces via
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.

  The country list always has a blank
 (equivalent of

  Choose one) as the first option in the list.
 When I select
  different countries, the state/province list
 changes
  accordingly. However, when I change to the blank
 in the
  country list, the state list stops updating. I
 looked into
  it and found out that in this situation (required
 droopdown
  list) selecting blank makes Wicket issue a
 feedback message
  instead of calling
  AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate, which
 is what I
  want.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Registering a Wicket Application using OSGi HTTP service

2010-03-18 Thread Jaime Soriano Pastor

Hello,

I'm trying to start a Wicket Application using Felix implementation of
OSGi HTTP service, for that I just register the service using
WicketServlet with applicationClassName parameter set to the main
application class name:

props.put(applicationClassName, MainApplication.class.getName());
service = (HttpService)context.getService(httpReference);
service.registerServlet(/, new WicketServlet(), props, null);

But it fails to register saying that wicket is Unable to create
application of class es.warp.sample.HTTPLocalGUI.MainApplication.
The output error also includes some lines about class loader so I
thought it was something related with visibility. I tried to export
everything but I had the same failure.


at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247)



I use for deployment maven and pax runner with Felix framework (mvn
package install pax:run -Dframework=felix -Dprofiles=log,config).
If I use equinox instead of felix, the application is registered and
works perfectly, it's ok for development, but I need it working on
felix for production deployment.

I'm thinking that I'm not doing it on the right way, but I don't know
how to do it. I also tried to publish the servlet using Felix
Whiteboard service, and I had the same results, it worked when I used
equinox and it didn't work when I used felix.

What am I doing wrong?


Regards,

Jaime.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: using IBehaviorListener

Please, any help?!

Best,
Martin

-Original Message-
From: Martin Asenov [mailto:mase...@velti.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:11 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: using IBehaviorListener

Hello, guys!

I'm experiencing troubles with implementing IBehaviorListener on a ModalWindow.

I want to detect every single user interaction with to components inside the 
modal window and the close button itself , as well.

Would you give me some hints?

Best,
Martin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: using IBehaviorListener

2010-03-18 Thread Fernando Wermus

Martin,
 You can have any container, such as a Panel, into de Modal Window. You
can program as you have always done with Wicket. No need of IBehaviorListener.
The close button has its corresponding programming design. Take a look at
the modal window documentation in the web.



On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Martin Asenov mase...@velti.com wrote:

 Please, any help?!

 Best,
 Martin

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Asenov [mailto:mase...@velti.com]
 Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:11 PM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: using IBehaviorListener

 Hello, guys!

 I'm experiencing troubles with implementing IBehaviorListener on a
 ModalWindow.

 I want to detect every single user interaction with to components inside
 the modal window and the close button itself , as well.

 Would you give me some hints?

 Best,
 Martin


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-- 
Fernando Wermus.

www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus

Re: Registering a Wicket Application using OSGi HTTP service

2010-03-18 Thread Fernando Wermus

Take a look at Antilia

http://code.google.com/p/antilia/

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Jaime Soriano Pastor 
jsorianopas...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I'm trying to start a Wicket Application using Felix implementation of
 OSGi HTTP service, for that I just register the service using
 WicketServlet with applicationClassName parameter set to the main
 application class name:

 props.put(applicationClassName, MainApplication.class.getName());
 service = (HttpService)context.getService(httpReference);
 service.registerServlet(/, new WicketServlet(), props, null);

 But it fails to register saying that wicket is Unable to create
 application of class es.warp.sample.HTTPLocalGUI.MainApplication.
 The output error also includes some lines about class loader so I
 thought it was something related with visibility. I tried to export
 everything but I had the same failure.
 
 
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320)
 at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
 at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247)
 
 

 I use for deployment maven and pax runner with Felix framework (mvn
 package install pax:run -Dframework=felix -Dprofiles=log,config).
 If I use equinox instead of felix, the application is registered and
 works perfectly, it's ok for development, but I need it working on
 felix for production deployment.

 I'm thinking that I'm not doing it on the right way, but I don't know
 how to do it. I also tried to publish the servlet using Felix
 Whiteboard service, and I had the same results, it worked when I used
 equinox and it didn't work when I used felix.

 What am I doing wrong?


 Regards,

 Jaime.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-- 
Fernando Wermus.

www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice

2010-03-18 Thread Martin Makundi

setNullValid

2010/3/18 David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com:
 In my case, the field is required. I make it required by setRequired(true), 
 but I want the blank/choose one is still there.

 Doable?


 --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch wrote:

 From: Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
 Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:42 AM
 Hi

 Yes, exactly, but why do you have it set to required at all
 in first
 place if you want to allow the empty selection too?
 I dont think a DropDownChoice is required by default but if
 it is, try
 setRequired(false) ...

 Matt

 On 2010-03-18 14:36, David Chang wrote:
  Matt, I already did that.
 
  DropDownChoice.setNullValid() makes Choose one
 always stay there.
  I notice that DropDownChoice.setRequired() is the
 reason to generate the message and not get onUpdate called.
 
  Thanks.
 
 
  --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
 wrote:
 
 
  From: Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
  Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required
 DropDownChoice
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:30 AM
  Hi
 
  Have a look at DropDownChoice.setNullValid() and
  .setRequired()
 
  Matt
 
  On 2010-03-18 14:26, David Chang wrote:
 
  Hi, I am new in Wicket and am playing with
 different
 
  components.
 
  I have a two dropdown lists. One is a list of
 
  countries, required field, controlling another
 list of
  states/provinces via
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.
 
  The country list always has a blank
 (equivalent of
 
  Choose one) as the first option in the list.
 When I select
  different countries, the state/province list
 changes
  accordingly. However, when I change to the blank
 in the
  country list, the state list stops updating. I
 looked into
  it and found out that in this situation (required
 droopdown
  list) selecting blank makes Wicket issue a
 feedback message
  instead of calling
  AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate, which
 is what I
  want.
 
 







 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: using IBehaviorListener

Hi, Fernando!

This is not my question... I was asking how could I know every time when the 
user interacts with the system.

Best,
Martin

-Original Message-
From: Fernando Wermus [mailto:fernando.wer...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:57 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: using IBehaviorListener

Martin,
 You can have any container, such as a Panel, into de Modal Window. You
can program as you have always done with Wicket. No need of IBehaviorListener.
The close button has its corresponding programming design. Take a look at
the modal window documentation in the web.



On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Martin Asenov mase...@velti.com wrote:

 Please, any help?!

 Best,
 Martin

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Asenov [mailto:mase...@velti.com]
 Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:11 PM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: using IBehaviorListener

 Hello, guys!

 I'm experiencing troubles with implementing IBehaviorListener on a
 ModalWindow.

 I want to detect every single user interaction with to components inside
 the modal window and the close button itself , as well.

 Would you give me some hints?

 Best,
 Martin


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-- 
Fernando Wermus.

www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: HttpsRequestCycleProcessor not immediately redirecting to https

why dont you continue this in the original thread. that way the
knowledge will not be spread all over.

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Gianni gdoe6...@yahoo.it wrote:
 Apologies, I now see it's exactly the same problem as described here:
 http://old.nabble.com/%40RequireHttps---forms-misbehaving-ts26845496.html

 I can reproduce this in a quickstart, I just want to check before creating a 
 jira:
 - In my quickstart I'm calling setRedirect(true) within the form submit 
 button's onSubmit(), is this the correct place to force a redirect?
 - SignInPage has the @RequireHttps annotation, *should* the code below result 
 in immediate redirection to the https page or am I missing something?

 Button submitButton = new Button(submit) {
       �...@override
        public void onSubmit() {
                setRedirect(true);
                setResponsePage(new SignInPage());
        }
 };

 -Gianni


 On 17/mar/2010, at 10.13, Gianni wrote:

 As part of a product purchase workflow I require users to sign-in or 
 register a new account in order to continue.
 In my purchase page I'm checking if the user is already signed-in and if not 
 I send them to a SignInOrRegisterPage which has the @RequireHttps annotation.

 BookingPage dest = new BookingPage(product);
 if (signedIn) {
       setResponsePage(dest);
 } else {
       session.getDefaultPageMap().put(dest);
       PageReference destPageRef = dest.getPageReference();
       setResponsePage(new SignInOrRegisterPage(destPageRef));
 }

 @RequireHttps
 public class SignInOrRegisterPage extends StandardBasePage {
    private PageReference destination;

    public SignInOrRegisterPage(PageReference finalDest) {
 ..

 In MyApplication:
 @Override
    protected IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor() {
        HttpsConfig config = new 
 HttpsConfig(MyApplication.get().getHttpPort(), 
 MyApplication.get().getHttpsPort());
        return new HttpsRequestCycleProcessor(config) {
           �...@override
            protected IRequestCodingStrategy newRequestCodingStrategy() {
                return new CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy(new 
 WebRequestCodingStrategy());
            }
        };
    }


 The initial redirection to SignInOrRegisterPage does not go to https, only 
 when I submit the form on the http SignInOrRegisterPage does it then 
 redirect to https.
 Any ideas why it's not going immediately to https?
 Thanks
 Gianni
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Tree with invisible Nodes

filter them in your TreeModel, it should work. you also have to
override getChildCount() to return a count without filtered children,
and adjust TreeModel#getIndexOfChild() to skip over the filtered
children.

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Martin U ufer.mar...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Hi Folks,

 i've to implement a tree in which some node are exists under a parent node
 but they should not be visible to the user in browser at all.

 I tried to overwrite getChild from TreeNode. But it dont works for me. I
 need this node existens either they are not visible because the tree is my
 data(model)-holder too for further processing


 Any Ideas?

 Thanks a lot.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice

Martin, thanks for chimining in. I already did that. The problem is when I 
select null (choose one), AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate is not 
called. Instead, Wicket generates a message and tries to seed it FeedbackPanel. 
I want to be able to handle that null and set another dropdown list blank.

Regards.

--- On Thu, 3/18/10, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 From: Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
 Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:58 AM
 setNullValid
 
 2010/3/18 David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com:
  In my case, the field is required. I make it required
 by setRequired(true), but I want the blank/choose one is
 still there.
 
  Doable?
 
 
  --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
 wrote:
 
  From: Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
  Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required
 DropDownChoice
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:42 AM
  Hi
 
  Yes, exactly, but why do you have it set to
 required at all
  in first
  place if you want to allow the empty selection
 too?
  I dont think a DropDownChoice is required by
 default but if
  it is, try
  setRequired(false) ...
 
  Matt
 
  On 2010-03-18 14:36, David Chang wrote:
   Matt, I already did that.
  
   DropDownChoice.setNullValid() makes Choose
 one
  always stay there.
   I notice that DropDownChoice.setRequired() is
 the
  reason to generate the message and not get
 onUpdate called.
  
   Thanks.
  
  
   --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
  wrote:
  
  
   From: Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
   Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a
 required
  DropDownChoice
   To: users@wicket.apache.org
   Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:30 AM
   Hi
  
   Have a look at
 DropDownChoice.setNullValid() and
   .setRequired()
  
   Matt
  
   On 2010-03-18 14:26, David Chang wrote:
  
   Hi, I am new in Wicket and am playing
 with
  different
  
   components.
  
   I have a two dropdown lists. One is a
 list of
  
   countries, required field, controlling
 another
  list of
   states/provinces via
  AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.
  
   The country list always has a blank
  (equivalent of
  
   Choose one) as the first option in the
 list.
  When I select
   different countries, the state/province
 list
  changes
   accordingly. However, when I change to
 the blank
  in the
   country list, the state list stops
 updating. I
  looked into
   it and found out that in this situation
 (required
  droopdown
   list) selecting blank makes Wicket issue
 a
  feedback message
   instead of calling
  
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate, which
  is what I
   want.
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 


  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: using IBehaviorListener

override requestcycle

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Martin Asenov mase...@velti.com wrote:
 Hi, Fernando!

 This is not my question... I was asking how could I know every time when the 
 user interacts with the system.

 Best,
 Martin

 -Original Message-
 From: Fernando Wermus [mailto:fernando.wer...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:57 PM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Re: using IBehaviorListener

 Martin,
     You can have any container, such as a Panel, into de Modal Window. You
 can program as you have always done with Wicket. No need of IBehaviorListener.
 The close button has its corresponding programming design. Take a look at
 the modal window documentation in the web.



 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Martin Asenov mase...@velti.com wrote:

 Please, any help?!

 Best,
 Martin

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Asenov [mailto:mase...@velti.com]
 Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:11 PM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: using IBehaviorListener

 Hello, guys!

 I'm experiencing troubles with implementing IBehaviorListener on a
 ModalWindow.

 I want to detect every single user interaction with to components inside
 the modal window and the close button itself , as well.

 Would you give me some hints?

 Best,
 Martin


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




 --
 Fernando Wermus.

 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

WicketTester and submiting form via ajax

2010-03-18 Thread Michał Letyński


Hi.
Again topic with submiting form via ajax with FileUpload inside. Im 
submiting form via AjaxButton.

For testing my panel im using:
wicketTester.executeAjaxEvent(butooon, onclick) - i want to test some 
logic in onSubmit()
and i get ServletRequest does not contain multipart content. One 
possible solution is to explicitly call Form.setMultipart(true), Wicket 
tries its best to auto-detect multipart forms but there are certain 
situation where it cannot.


executeAjaxEvent method does not check if form is multiPart. To 
workaround this problem before executeAjaxEvent we can execute:
   MockHttpServletRequest servletRequest = 
wicketTester.getServletRequest();

   servletRequest.setUseMultiPartContentType(true);
But its annoying to set this flag again and again. Could you extend 
executeAjaxEvent to check if form is multiPart ? Similar checking is 
already done in FormTester.onSubmit().

Can i create jirra issue ?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: wicket-contrib-javaee: @EJB injection - injecting always the same instance regardless of session

2010-03-18 Thread Manfred Bergmann

Hi.

AFAIK a Wicket user session and a EJB Session are separated. Meaning that
the EJB container decides whether a new EJB instance needs to be created or
not. However even if multiple Wicket sessions get the same EJB instance the
EJB container will still ensure proper synchronisation and transaction
management.

Manfred

t3_chris wrote:

Hi!

I've just started using the @EJB injection annotation from
wicket-contrib-javaee.
I use it to inject a Stateful Session Bean to keep track of my user
session and do some
stuff like authorization.

I thought the @EJB annotation keeps track of my sessions and would
inject a unique instance of
the Stateful Session Bean for each of my Wicket session.

But, it injects always the same Stateful Session Bean instance
completely ignoring my Wicket sessions. In this case it is useless to
keep track of my users.

Am i doing anything wrong or is this the intended behaviour?

Would it be better to get the Stateful Session Bean by a lookup call and
then store it in the
Wicket session?

Thanks for your help!

Best Regards,
christian

--
Christian Reiter|||c.rei...@gmx.net

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/wicket-contrib-javaee%3A-%40EJB-injection---injecting-always-the-same-instance-regardless-of-session-tp27943127p27947476.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice

2010-03-18 Thread Martin Makundi

Code?

2010/3/18 David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com:
 Martin, thanks for chimining in. I already did that. The problem is when I 
 select null (choose one), AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate is not 
 called. Instead, Wicket generates a message and tries to seed it 
 FeedbackPanel. I want to be able to handle that null and set another 
 dropdown list blank.

 Regards.

 --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com 
 wrote:

 From: Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
 Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:58 AM
 setNullValid

 2010/3/18 David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com:
  In my case, the field is required. I make it required
 by setRequired(true), but I want the blank/choose one is
 still there.
 
  Doable?
 
 
  --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
 wrote:
 
  From: Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
  Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required
 DropDownChoice
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:42 AM
  Hi
 
  Yes, exactly, but why do you have it set to
 required at all
  in first
  place if you want to allow the empty selection
 too?
  I dont think a DropDownChoice is required by
 default but if
  it is, try
  setRequired(false) ...
 
  Matt
 
  On 2010-03-18 14:36, David Chang wrote:
   Matt, I already did that.
  
   DropDownChoice.setNullValid() makes Choose
 one
  always stay there.
   I notice that DropDownChoice.setRequired() is
 the
  reason to generate the message and not get
 onUpdate called.
  
   Thanks.
  
  
   --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
  wrote:
  
  
   From: Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
   Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a
 required
  DropDownChoice
   To: users@wicket.apache.org
   Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:30 AM
   Hi
  
   Have a look at
 DropDownChoice.setNullValid() and
   .setRequired()
  
   Matt
  
   On 2010-03-18 14:26, David Chang wrote:
  
   Hi, I am new in Wicket and am playing
 with
  different
  
   components.
  
   I have a two dropdown lists. One is a
 list of
  
   countries, required field, controlling
 another
  list of
   states/provinces via
  AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.
  
   The country list always has a blank
  (equivalent of
  
   Choose one) as the first option in the
 list.
  When I select
   different countries, the state/province
 list
  changes
   accordingly. However, when I change to
 the blank
  in the
   country list, the state list stops
 updating. I
  looked into
   it and found out that in this situation
 (required
  droopdown
   list) selecting blank makes Wicket issue
 a
  feedback message
   instead of calling
  
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate, which
  is what I
   want.
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org






 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Registering a Wicket Application using OSGi HTTP service

2010-03-18 Thread Jaime Soriano Pastor

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
 Take a look at Antilia

 http://code.google.com/p/antilia/

Thanks for the suggestion, Antilia seems to be a really interesting
project, but it didn't solve my problem :(

What I tried was to create a new Activator (AntiliaActivator) that
extends WicketServletServiceActivator and implements BundleActivator.
AntiliaActivator getApplicationClass() returns
AntiliaMainApplication.class that extends AntiliaWebApplication that
returns the MainPage class as Home Page.

The new thing is that this solution also fails with Equinox, with a
similar exception.

Regards,

Jaime.

 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Jaime Soriano Pastor 
 jsorianopas...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I'm trying to start a Wicket Application using Felix implementation of
 OSGi HTTP service, for that I just register the service using
 WicketServlet with applicationClassName parameter set to the main
 application class name:

 props.put(applicationClassName, MainApplication.class.getName());
 service = (HttpService)context.getService(httpReference);
 service.registerServlet(/, new WicketServlet(), props, null);

 But it fails to register saying that wicket is Unable to create
 application of class es.warp.sample.HTTPLocalGUI.MainApplication.
 The output error also includes some lines about class loader so I
 thought it was something related with visibility. I tried to export
 everything but I had the same failure.
 
 
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320)
 at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
 at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247)
 
 

 I use for deployment maven and pax runner with Felix framework (mvn
 package install pax:run -Dframework=felix -Dprofiles=log,config).
 If I use equinox instead of felix, the application is registered and
 works perfectly, it's ok for development, but I need it working on
 felix for production deployment.

 I'm thinking that I'm not doing it on the right way, but I don't know
 how to do it. I also tried to publish the servlet using Felix
 Whiteboard service, and I had the same results, it worked when I used
 equinox and it didn't work when I used felix.

 What am I doing wrong?


 Regards,

 Jaime.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




 --
 Fernando Wermus.

 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Analyzing HTML markup.

2010-03-18 Thread Sergey Olefir

Hi,

is it possible to (easily) analyze HTML markup at runtime? More
specifically I'm thinking about implementing a component that will
examine its (or more realistically the markup of extending class)
markup to determine whether or not particular wicket:id is present.

Or, in other words, is it possible to implement base component that
will or will not add(..) some 'other component' inside itself
depending on whether child (extending class) has provided place for
'other component' in its markup?

Thanks in advance!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Analyzing HTML markup.

you can use IComponentResolver to achieve this.

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Sergey Olefir solf.li...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 is it possible to (easily) analyze HTML markup at runtime? More
 specifically I'm thinking about implementing a component that will
 examine its (or more realistically the markup of extending class)
 markup to determine whether or not particular wicket:id is present.

 Or, in other words, is it possible to implement base component that
 will or will not add(..) some 'other component' inside itself
 depending on whether child (extending class) has provided place for
 'other component' in its markup?

 Thanks in advance!

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Cookie, WebRequest and mount point

2010-03-18 Thread Daniele Dellafiore

Hi.

During the login I set a cookie called login.
It works but when I want to logout, getWebRequest().getCookie(login)
does  not found the cookie so it does not remove it. The user is redirected
to the LoginPage where it still found the original cookie that auto login
the client.

Why? Because the first time I search for the cookie, WebRequest have context
/ while the second time, in the LoginPage, has context /login. The reason is
that the public page, when user land when is not logged in, is mounted this
way:

mountBookmarkablePage(login, LoginPage.class);

this make the cookie be set for WebRequest with context /public.
Logout link instead search for WebRequest with context /, with no cookie, so
it cannot remove the old one and the user is logged out and logged in again
automatically.

In fact, If I do not mount pages, everything works. But I want to have nice
URL. It is not important that landing page is /public, I would prefere that
both landing page and home page (after signing in), have just / context.

How can I achieve this? Any ideas?

Thanks!

-- 
Daniele Dellafiore
http://danieledellafiore.net

Re: Cookie, WebRequest and mount point

always save your cookies using the / path

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Daniele Dellafiore ilde...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi.

 During the login I set a cookie called login.
 It works but when I want to logout, getWebRequest().getCookie(login)
 does  not found the cookie so it does not remove it. The user is redirected
 to the LoginPage where it still found the original cookie that auto login
 the client.

 Why? Because the first time I search for the cookie, WebRequest have context
 / while the second time, in the LoginPage, has context /login. The reason is
 that the public page, when user land when is not logged in, is mounted this
 way:

 mountBookmarkablePage(login, LoginPage.class);

 this make the cookie be set for WebRequest with context /public.
 Logout link instead search for WebRequest with context /, with no cookie, so
 it cannot remove the old one and the user is logged out and logged in again
 automatically.

 In fact, If I do not mount pages, everything works. But I want to have nice
 URL. It is not important that landing page is /public, I would prefere that
 both landing page and home page (after signing in), have just / context.

 How can I achieve this? Any ideas?

 Thanks!

 --
 Daniele Dellafiore
 http://danieledellafiore.net


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-18 Thread Boris Goldowsky

Thank you for your thoughts Jeremy -- and your previous work on
WicketStuff.  I am certainly unhappy to hear that it felt like torture
and that junk was being dumped on you rather than getting support from
the community.

I'd volunteer to put a bit of time into this, but I don't have time to
be sole maintainer either.  Maybe there could be a small group who all
helped out - anyone else on this list willing to step up?

I already offered to fix and update the TinyMCE module, but that is
currently stalled since the necessary dependency is not in the
repository and I don't have permissions to add it.

Bng


On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 16:21 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:

 
 I tried.  I don't have the time it takes.  With the free-for-all access that
 is given to it, people consistently commit inconsistent junk that they don't
 ever intend on maintaining in there.  Feel free to take over - most of the
 reorganization work is already done for you - by me.  You can pick up where
 I left off and carry the torture stake as far as you want.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Cookie, WebRequest and mount point

2010-03-18 Thread Daniele Dellafiore

is what I have done, I ask my self if is fine.

I have backported the IAuthenticationStrategy and CookieUtils from 1.5 and
CookieUtils initialize the cookie with the path. I have hacked it and it
works. I wonder if I will have any other problem in future.

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 always save your cookies using the / path

 -igor

 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Daniele Dellafiore ilde...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi.
 
  During the login I set a cookie called login.
  It works but when I want to logout, getWebRequest().getCookie(login)
  does  not found the cookie so it does not remove it. The user is
 redirected
  to the LoginPage where it still found the original cookie that auto login
  the client.
 
  Why? Because the first time I search for the cookie, WebRequest have
 context
  / while the second time, in the LoginPage, has context /login. The reason
 is
  that the public page, when user land when is not logged in, is mounted
 this
  way:
 
  mountBookmarkablePage(login, LoginPage.class);
 
  this make the cookie be set for WebRequest with context /public.
  Logout link instead search for WebRequest with context /, with no cookie,
 so
  it cannot remove the old one and the user is logged out and logged in
 again
  automatically.
 
  In fact, If I do not mount pages, everything works. But I want to have
 nice
  URL. It is not important that landing page is /public, I would prefere
 that
  both landing page and home page (after signing in), have just / context.
 
  How can I achieve this? Any ideas?
 
  Thanks!
 
  --
  Daniele Dellafiore
  http://danieledellafiore.net
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-- 
Daniele Dellafiore
http://danieledellafiore.net

Re: TinyMCE components in WicketStuff

http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/jazzyplugin/jazzyplugin/0.5.2/

-igor

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Boris Goldowsky bgoldow...@cast.org wrote:
 Great.  Can someone with write access to the repository do this?  Or if i
 can do it via my SVN credentials, tell me how.

 Thanks!

 Bng


 Igor Vaynberg wrote:

 sure

 -igor

 On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Boris Goldowsky bgoldow...@cast.org
 wrote:


 The TinyMCE package depends on the Jazzy spell checker, which doesn't
 seem
 to be in any public maven repository.  Would it be reasonable to put that
 jar into the wicketstuff repository?

 The latest version appears to be the one at
 https://sourceforge.net/projects/jazzy/files/

 Bng

    -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Registering a Wicket Application using OSGi HTTP service

2010-03-18 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Hi,

That's weird. Did you tried to check-out [1] and  [2]? They did work a
couple of month ago when I tested them.

Ernesto

References,

1-http://code.google.com/p/antilia/source/browse/#svn/com.antilia.wstarter
2-
http://code.google.com/p/antilia/source/browse/#svn/com.antilia.wstarter.demo






On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Jaime Soriano Pastor 
jsorianopas...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Fernando Wermus
 fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
  Take a look at Antilia
 
  http://code.google.com/p/antilia/
 
 Thanks for the suggestion, Antilia seems to be a really interesting
 project, but it didn't solve my problem :(

 What I tried was to create a new Activator (AntiliaActivator) that
 extends WicketServletServiceActivator and implements BundleActivator.
 AntiliaActivator getApplicationClass() returns
 AntiliaMainApplication.class that extends AntiliaWebApplication that
 returns the MainPage class as Home Page.

 The new thing is that this solution also fails with Equinox, with a
 similar exception.

 Regards,

 Jaime.

  On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Jaime Soriano Pastor 
  jsorianopas...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hello,
 
  I'm trying to start a Wicket Application using Felix implementation of
  OSGi HTTP service, for that I just register the service using
  WicketServlet with applicationClassName parameter set to the main
  application class name:
 
  props.put(applicationClassName, MainApplication.class.getName());
  service = (HttpService)context.getService(httpReference);
  service.registerServlet(/, new WicketServlet(), props, null);
 
  But it fails to register saying that wicket is Unable to create
  application of class es.warp.sample.HTTPLocalGUI.MainApplication.
  The output error also includes some lines about class loader so I
  thought it was something related with visibility. I tried to export
  everything but I had the same failure.
  
  
  at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
  at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320)
  at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
  at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247)
  
  
 
  I use for deployment maven and pax runner with Felix framework (mvn
  package install pax:run -Dframework=felix -Dprofiles=log,config).
  If I use equinox instead of felix, the application is registered and
  works perfectly, it's ok for development, but I need it working on
  felix for production deployment.
 
  I'm thinking that I'm not doing it on the right way, but I don't know
  how to do it. I also tried to publish the servlet using Felix
  Whiteboard service, and I had the same results, it worked when I used
  equinox and it didn't work when I used felix.
 
  What am I doing wrong?
 
 
  Regards,
 
  Jaime.
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
  --
  Fernando Wermus.
 
  www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

LoadableDetachableListModel

2010-03-18 Thread Ilja Pavkovic

Hi,

if someone is interested in a LoadableDetachableListModel where every single 
entity in the List is loaded per request by its own detachable model, see 
below :). 

I found it quite useful. I needed for a multi file upload panel where all 
changes entities shall be saved in one step.

public class DocumentModelDocument extends 
LoadableDetachableListModelDocument{

public DDE(ListDocument entities) {
super(entities);
}

protected IModelT createModel(Document entity) {
return new EntityBaseLoadableDetachableModelDocument(entity);
}

}

package de.binaerebauten.app.presentation.wicket.model;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ListIterator;

import org.apache.wicket.model.IModel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.LoadableDetachableModel;

@SuppressWarnings(serial)
public abstract class LoadableDetachableListModelT extends 
LoadableDetachableModelListT{

private ListIModelT modelsList = new ArrayListIModelT();

private ListT entities;

public LoadableDetachableListModel() {

}

public LoadableDetachableListModel(ListT entities) {
addAll(entities);
}

protected void addAll(ListT entities) {
for(T entity: entities) {
add(entity);
}
}

public void onDetach() {
for(IModelT model : modelsList) {
model.detach();
}
entities = null;
}

private ListT loadAll() {
ListT rv = new ArrayListT();
for(IModelT model : modelsList) {
rv.add(model.getObject());
}
return rv;
}

protected ListT load() {
if(entities != null) {
return entities;
}
entities = new ListT() {

public boolean add(T o) {
return modelsList.add(createModel(o));
}


public void add(int index, T element) {
modelsList.add(index, createModel(element));
}

public boolean addAll(Collection? extends T c) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}

public boolean addAll(int index, Collection? extends 
T c) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}

public void clear() {
modelsList.clear();
}

public boolean contains(Object o) {
return indexOf(o)  -1;
}

public boolean containsAll(Collection? c) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}

public T get(int index) {
IModelT model = modelsList.get(index);
return model.getObject();
}

public int indexOf(Object o) {
int pos = 0;
for(IModelT model : modelsList) {
T o1 = model.getObject();
if(o1.equals(o)) {
return pos;
}
pos++;
}
return -1;
}

public boolean isEmpty() {
return modelsList.isEmpty();
}

public IteratorT iterator() {
return new IteratorT() {
IteratorIModelT delegate = 
modelsList.iterator();

public boolean hasNext() {
return delegate.hasNext();
}

public T next() {
IModelT model = 
delegate.next();
return model == null ? null : 
model.getObject();
}

public void remove() {
delegate.remove();
}
};

Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap locked

2010-03-18 Thread Nigel Parker

Thank you Johan for your reply. Agree that original problem should be fixed.
This is a critical problem for us. We have found out during the last 24
hours that some of our pages are retaining a session reference. With Ajax
requests this gives a doubling of session size for every request, and we now
believe this to be the cause of the StackOverflowErrors. We will try this in
production tomorrow.

We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked when the
stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?

Thanks
Nigel

Johan Compagner wrote:

i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.

Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page is not
in
a valid state in the session.
So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that doesnt
work

So what should be fixed is the original problem

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 21:03, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
wrote:

We are a Wicket shop and for one of our clients have been running a
Wicket application successfully for over 2 years. We are now at
version 1.4.0. The traffic on the system is increasing and we are now
seeing an increased frequency of pagemap locking which is beginning to
be a serious problem for the users. By subclassing WebRequestCycle we
have identified that a StackOverflowError under serialization in
RequestCycle.detach() leaves the pagemap locked for the next minute.
If our analysis is correct this is essentially the problem reported as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2075. Unfortunately we
cannot reproduce the problem in our test environment and it occurs
only in about one in every thousand requests with no apparent
consistent pattern about what the user has been doing. Can anybody
suggest an immediate strategy for further investigations? In
particular:

- is there a practical way to find out what is causing the
serialization problem. The stack trace is no help. We do in many cases
have large amounts of data in the session, but doubling the default
stack size leaves the problem frequency unchanged leading us to
suspect a logical error rather the sheer amount of data.

- by overriding RequestCycle.detach() and catching the
StackOverflowError we can get control when the error occurs. Is there
any way we can persuade Wicket to release the pagemap lock? I have
looked at the code and this doesn't look straightforward.

- can we get Wicket itself to suppress the StackOverflowError so that
detach() continues and releases the lock?

Grateful for any suggestions.

Nigel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/StackOverflowError-under-serialization-leaves-pagemap-locked-tp27938028p27950858.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice

Martin, the following is the code for the country dropdown list, which can 
control the state dropdown list. The problem is that when the country list's 
value is switched to null from a selected country (say, USA), then the state 
dropdown list does not update. In addition, Wicket in the backend has the 
following message. Another puzzling thing to me is that my FeedbackPanel is 
there as defined below.

--- message 

18:38:20,890  WARN WebSession:193 - Component-targetted feedback message was 
left unrendered. This could be because you
are missing a FeedbackPanel on the page.  Message: [FeedbackMessage message = 
Field 'Country' is required., reporter =
 country, level = ERROR]



--- dropdown list code ---

ListCountry countryList = objectService.findAllCountries();
DropDownChoice countryDDC = new DropDownChoice(country,
countryList,
new ChoiceRenderer(name, id) );
countryDDC.setRequired(true);
countryDDC.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {

protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
if (target != null) {
MyUser u = f.getModelObject();
u.setState(null);
DropDownChoice stateDDC = (DropDownChoice) f.get(state);

stateDDC.setChoices(objectService.findStatesByCountry(f.getModelObject().getCountry()));
  target.addComponent(stateDDC);
}
}
});
f.add(new FormComponentFeedbackBorder(borderCountry).add(countryDDC));

-- FeedbackPanel code 

add(new FeedbackPanel(feedbackHolder) {
@Override
public boolean isVisible() {
return true;//anyMessage();
}
}.setOutputMarkupId(true));







--- On Thu, 3/18/10, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:





 From: Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
 Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:50 AM
 Code?
 
 2010/3/18 David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com:
  Martin, thanks for chimining in. I already did that.
 The problem is when I select null (choose one),
 AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior#onUpdate is not called.
 Instead, Wicket generates a message and tries to seed it
 FeedbackPanel. I want to be able to handle that null and
 set another dropdown list blank.
 
  Regards.
 
  --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
 wrote:
 
  From: Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
  Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a required
 DropDownChoice
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:58 AM
  setNullValid
 
  2010/3/18 David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com:
   In my case, the field is required. I make it
 required
  by setRequired(true), but I want the blank/choose
 one is
  still there.
  
   Doable?
  
  
   --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
  wrote:
  
   From: Matthias Keller matthias.kel...@ergon.ch
   Subject: Re: Select the Choose one of a
 required
  DropDownChoice
   To: users@wicket.apache.org
   Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:42 AM
   Hi
  
   Yes, exactly, but why do you have it set
 to
  required at all
   in first
   place if you want to allow the empty
 selection
  too?
   I dont think a DropDownChoice is required
 by
  default but if
   it is, try
   setRequired(false) ...
  
   Matt
  
   On 2010-03-18 14:36, David Chang wrote:
Matt, I already did that.
   
DropDownChoice.setNullValid() makes
 Choose
  one
   always stay there.
I notice that
 DropDownChoice.setRequired() is
  the
   reason to generate the message and not
 get
  onUpdate called.
   
Thanks.
   
   
--- On Thu, 3/18/10, Matthias
 Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
   wrote:
   
   
From: Matthias Kellermatthias.kel...@ergon.ch
Subject: Re: Select the Choose
 one of a
  required
   DropDownChoice
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010,
 9:30 AM
Hi
   
Have a look at
  DropDownChoice.setNullValid() and
.setRequired()
   
Matt
   
On 2010-03-18 14:26, David Chang
 wrote:
   
Hi, I am new in Wicket and
 am playing
  with
   different
   
components.
   
I have a two dropdown lists.
 One is a
  list of
   
countries, required field,
 controlling
  another
   list of
states/provinces via
   AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.
   
The country list always has
 a blank
   (equivalent of
   
Choose one) as the first
 option in the
  list.
   When I select
different countries, the
 state/province
  list
   changes
accordingly. However, when I
 change to
  the blank
   in the
country list, the state list
 stops
  updating. I
   looked into
it and found out that in this
 situation
  (required
   droopdown
list) selecting blank makes
 Wicket issue
  a
   feedback message
instead of calling

Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap locked

the fix is in 1.4.x branch and will be part of 1.4.8.

in the meantime you can build a fresh snapshot yourself and drop that
into your application

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@mazeppa.no wrote:

We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked when the
stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?

Thanks
Nigel

Johan Compagner wrote:

i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.

Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page is not
in
a valid state in the session.
So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that doesnt
work

So what should be fixed is the original problem

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 21:03, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
wrote:

- can we get Wicket itself to suppress the StackOverflowError so that
detach() continues and releases the lock?

Grateful for any suggestions.

Nigel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap locked

2010-03-18 Thread Johan Compagner

Or:

http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.4-SNAPSHOT/

That should also have the latest fix

- Original message -
the fix is in 1.4.x branch and will be part of 1.4.8.

in the meantime you can build a fresh snapshot yourself and drop that
into your application

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@mazeppa.no wrote:

We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked when the
stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?

Thanks
Nigel

Johan Compagner wrote:

i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.

Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page is not
in
a valid state in the session.
So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that doesnt
work

So what should be fixed is the original problem

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 21:03, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
wrote:

- can we get Wicket itself to suppress the StackOverflowError so that
detach() continues and releases the lock?

Grateful for any suggestions.

Nigel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs

I'm using BookmarkablePageLink extensively as it makes it easy to add
parameter name/value pairs. I end up with URLs like:

www.mysite.com/p1/v1/p2/v2

Which works fine for most cases but I have a number of questions/issues:

My logs show exceptions whereby some browsers (or crawlers) without
cookies enabled end up requesting URLs with the ;jessionid=... suffix
which is used when no cookie support is available.

The exception is caused when I try to convert a parameter and the
session suffix is included in its value eg.,

org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringValueConversionException: Unable to
convert '4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC' to a long
value

The parameter pair was intended to be:

parameter1/4574  i.e. parameter1=4574

but with the suffix added by tomcat in the absence of cookies it became:

parameter1/4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC

i.e. parameter1=4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC

which isn't a valid integer value and so causes an exception.

What can we do about this? Is it possible to force wicket to always add
a trailing / because this would help wicket's parameter parser avoid
this issue eg.,

parameter1/4574/;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC

should work fine I'd imagine.

Another thing about trailing slashes: apparently a trailing slash can
avoid an redirect. Apparently:

www.mysite.com/p1/v1 will be redirected to 
www.mysite.com/p1/v1/

If the URL was simply www.mysite.com/p1/v1/ then the redirect is
avoided.


7%3Bjsessionid%3D3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC

 -Original Message-
 From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 9:56 AM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap
locked
 
 the fix is in 1.4.x branch and will be part of 1.4.8.
 
 in the meantime you can build a fresh snapshot yourself and drop that
 into your application
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x
 
 -igor
 
 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Parker
nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
 wrote:
 
  Thank you Johan for your reply. Agree that original problem should
be
 fixed.
  This is a critical problem for us. We have found out during the last
24
  hours that some of our pages are retaining a session reference. With
 Ajax
  requests this gives a doubling of session size for every request,
and we
 now
  believe this to be the cause of the StackOverflowErrors. We will try
 this in
  production tomorrow.
 
  We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked
when
 the
  stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?
 
  Thanks
  Nigel
 
 
  Johan Compagner wrote:
 
  i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.
 
  Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page
is
 not
  in
  a valid state in the session.
  So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that
doesnt
  work
 
  So what should be fixed is the original problem
 
 
 
  On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 21:03, Nigel Parker
nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
  wrote:
 
  We are a Wicket shop and for one of our clients have been running
a
  Wicket application successfully for over 2 years. We are now at
  version 1.4.0. The traffic on the system is increasing and we are
now
  seeing an increased frequency of pagemap locking which is
beginning to
  be a serious problem for the users. By subclassing WebRequestCycle
we
  have identified that a StackOverflowError under serialization in
  RequestCycle.detach() leaves the pagemap locked for the next
minute.
  If our analysis is correct this is essentially the problem
reported as
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2075. Unfortunately
we
  cannot reproduce the problem in our test environment and it occurs
  only in about one in every thousand requests with no apparent
  consistent pattern about what the user has been doing. Can anybody
  suggest an immediate strategy for further investigations? In
  particular:
 
  - is there a practical way to find out what is causing the
  serialization problem. The stack trace is no help. We do in many
cases
  have large amounts of data in the session, but doubling the
default
  stack size leaves the problem frequency unchanged leading us to
  suspect a logical error rather the sheer amount of data.
 
  - by overriding RequestCycle.detach() and catching the
  StackOverflowError we can get control when the error occurs. Is
there
  any way we can persuade Wicket to release the pagemap lock? I have
  looked at the code and this doesn't look straightforward.
 
  - can we get Wicket itself to suppress the StackOverflowError so
that
  detach() continues and releases the lock?
 
  Grateful for any suggestions.
 
  Nigel
 
 
-
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  View this

Re: Select the Choose one of a required DropDownChoice

2010-03-18 Thread James Carman

Perhaps put logic in onsubmit to check for required country?

On Mar 18, 2010 6:45 PM, David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com wrote:

Martin, the following is the code for the country dropdown list, which can
control the state dropdown list. The problem is that when the country list's
value is switched to null from a selected country (say, USA), then the
state dropdown list does not update. In addition, Wicket in the backend has
the following message. Another puzzling thing to me is that my FeedbackPanel
is there as defined below.

--- message 

18:38:20,890  WARN WebSession:193 - Component-targetted feedback message was
left unrendered. This could be because you
are missing a FeedbackPanel on the page.  Message: [FeedbackMessage message
= Field 'Country' is required., reporter =
 country, level = ERROR]



--- dropdown list code ---

ListCountry countryList = objectService.findAllCountries();
DropDownChoice countryDDC = new DropDownChoice(country,
   countryList,
   new ChoiceRenderer(name, id) );
countryDDC.setRequired(true);
countryDDC.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {

   protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
   if (target != null) {
   MyUser u = f.getModelObject();
   u.setState(null);
   DropDownChoice stateDDC = (DropDownChoice) f.get(state);

 
stateDDC.setChoices(objectService.findStatesByCountry(f.getModelObject().getCountry()));
 target.addComponent(stateDDC);
   }
   }
   });
f.add(new FormComponentFeedbackBorder(borderCountry).add(countryDDC));

-- FeedbackPanel code 

add(new FeedbackPanel(feedbackHolder) {
   @Override
   public boolean isVisible() {
   return true;//anyMessage();
   }
}.setOutputMarkupId(true));








--- On Thu, 3/18/10, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
wrote:





 From: ...
 Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:50 AM

 Code?

 2010/3/18 David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com:
  Martin, thanks for chimining in. I...

Re: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs

i suggest always mounting with querystringurlcodingstrategy unless you
specifically want the folder structure of /name1/value1/name2/value2
which most of the time you dont. too bad this was made the default, we
cant change it in 1.4 but are fixing it in 1.5 as it causes all kinds
of problems.

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
 I'm using BookmarkablePageLink extensively as it makes it easy to add
 parameter name/value pairs. I end up with URLs like:

 www.mysite.com/p1/v1/p2/v2

 Which works fine for most cases but I have a number of questions/issues:

 My logs show exceptions whereby some browsers (or crawlers) without
 cookies enabled end up requesting URLs with the ;jessionid=... suffix
 which is used when no cookie support is available.

 The exception is caused when I try to convert a parameter and the
 session suffix is included in its value eg.,

 org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringValueConversionException: Unable to
 convert '4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC' to a long
 value

 The parameter pair was intended to be:

 parameter1/4574  i.e. parameter1=4574

 but with the suffix added by tomcat in the absence of cookies it became:

 parameter1/4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC

 i.e. parameter1=4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC

 which isn't a valid integer value and so causes an exception.

 What can we do about this? Is it possible to force wicket to always add
 a trailing / because this would help wicket's parameter parser avoid
 this issue eg.,

 parameter1/4574/;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC

 should work fine I'd imagine.

 Another thing about trailing slashes: apparently a trailing slash can
 avoid an redirect. Apparently:

 www.mysite.com/p1/v1 will be redirected to
 www.mysite.com/p1/v1/

 If the URL was simply www.mysite.com/p1/v1/ then the redirect is
 avoided.


 7%3Bjsessionid%3D3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC

 -Original Message-
 From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 9:56 AM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap
 locked

 the fix is in 1.4.x branch and will be part of 1.4.8.

 in the meantime you can build a fresh snapshot yourself and drop that
 into your application

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x

 -igor

 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Parker
 nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
 wrote:
 
  Thank you Johan for your reply. Agree that original problem should
 be
 fixed.
  This is a critical problem for us. We have found out during the last
 24
  hours that some of our pages are retaining a session reference. With
 Ajax
  requests this gives a doubling of session size for every request,
 and we
 now
  believe this to be the cause of the StackOverflowErrors. We will try
 this in
  production tomorrow.
 
  We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked
 when
 the
  stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?
 
  Thanks
  Nigel
 
 
  Johan Compagner wrote:
 
  i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.
 
  Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page
 is
 not
  in
  a valid state in the session.
  So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that
 doesnt
  work
 
  So what should be fixed is the original problem
 
 
 
  On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 21:03, Nigel Parker
 nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
  wrote:
 
  We are a Wicket shop and for one of our clients have been running
 a
  Wicket application successfully for over 2 years. We are now at
  version 1.4.0. The traffic on the system is increasing and we are
 now
  seeing an increased frequency of pagemap locking which is
 beginning to
  be a serious problem for the users. By subclassing WebRequestCycle
 we
  have identified that a StackOverflowError under serialization in
  RequestCycle.detach() leaves the pagemap locked for the next
 minute.
  If our analysis is correct this is essentially the problem
 reported as
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2075. Unfortunately
 we
  cannot reproduce the problem in our test environment and it occurs
  only in about one in every thousand requests with no apparent
  consistent pattern about what the user has been doing. Can anybody
  suggest an immediate strategy for further investigations? In
  particular:
 
  - is there a practical way to find out what is causing the
  serialization problem. The stack trace is no help. We do in many
 cases
  have large amounts of data in the session, but doubling the
 default
  stack size leaves the problem frequency unchanged leading us to
  suspect a logical error rather the sheer amount of data.
 
  - by overriding RequestCycle.detach() and catching the
  StackOverflowError we can get control when the error occurs. Is
 there
  any way we can persuade Wicket to release the pagemap lock? I have
  looked at the code

RE: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs

Ouch! All the pages are indexed under google with the /name1/value1 strategy 
will this mean the google page links will break if we switch to 
querystringurlcodingstrategy or can wicket handle resolution of both types of 
strategies when it comes to responding to requests?

I thought the thinking was that search engines indexed the /name1/value1 
structure better than the query string ?name1=value1 because they look like 
directories or is that old SEO thinking?

Regards,
Chris


 -Original Message-
 From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 10:53 AM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs
 
 i suggest always mounting with querystringurlcodingstrategy unless you
 specifically want the folder structure of /name1/value1/name2/value2
 which most of the time you dont. too bad this was made the default, we
 cant change it in 1.4 but are fixing it in 1.5 as it causes all kinds
 of problems.
 
 -igor
 
 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Chris Colman
 chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
  I'm using BookmarkablePageLink extensively as it makes it easy to add
  parameter name/value pairs. I end up with URLs like:
 
  www.mysite.com/p1/v1/p2/v2
 
  Which works fine for most cases but I have a number of questions/issues:
 
  My logs show exceptions whereby some browsers (or crawlers) without
  cookies enabled end up requesting URLs with the ;jessionid=... suffix
  which is used when no cookie support is available.
 
  The exception is caused when I try to convert a parameter and the
  session suffix is included in its value eg.,
 
  org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringValueConversionException: Unable to
  convert '4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC' to a long
  value
 
  The parameter pair was intended to be:
 
  parameter1/4574  i.e. parameter1=4574
 
  but with the suffix added by tomcat in the absence of cookies it became:
 
  parameter1/4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
 
  i.e. parameter1=4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
 
  which isn't a valid integer value and so causes an exception.
 
  What can we do about this? Is it possible to force wicket to always add
  a trailing / because this would help wicket's parameter parser avoid
  this issue eg.,
 
  parameter1/4574/;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
 
  should work fine I'd imagine.
 
  Another thing about trailing slashes: apparently a trailing slash can
  avoid an redirect. Apparently:
 
  www.mysite.com/p1/v1 will be redirected to
  www.mysite.com/p1/v1/
 
  If the URL was simply www.mysite.com/p1/v1/ then the redirect is
  avoided.
 
 
  7%3Bjsessionid%3D3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 9:56 AM
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Subject: Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap
  locked
 
  the fix is in 1.4.x branch and will be part of 1.4.8.
 
  in the meantime you can build a fresh snapshot yourself and drop that
  into your application
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x
 
  -igor
 
  On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Parker
  nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
  wrote:
  
   Thank you Johan for your reply. Agree that original problem should
  be
  fixed.
   This is a critical problem for us. We have found out during the last
  24
   hours that some of our pages are retaining a session reference. With
  Ajax
   requests this gives a doubling of session size for every request,
  and we
  now
   believe this to be the cause of the StackOverflowErrors. We will try
  this in
   production tomorrow.
  
   We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked
  when
  the
   stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?
  
   Thanks
   Nigel
  
  
   Johan Compagner wrote:
  
   i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.
  
   Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page
  is
  not
   in
   a valid state in the session.
   So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that
  doesnt
   work
  
   So what should be fixed is the original problem
  
  
  
   On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 21:03, Nigel Parker
  nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
   wrote:
  
   We are a Wicket shop and for one of our clients have been running
  a
   Wicket application successfully for over 2 years. We are now at
   version 1.4.0. The traffic on the system is increasing and we are
  now
   seeing an increased frequency of pagemap locking which is
  beginning to
   be a serious problem for the users. By subclassing WebRequestCycle
  we
   have identified that a StackOverflowError under serialization in
   RequestCycle.detach() leaves the pagemap locked for the next
  minute.
   If our analysis is correct this is essentially the problem
  reported as
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2075. Unfortunately
  we

Re: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs

that is mostly old seo thinking. some people still prerfer urls like

/blog/entry/2007/my_awesome_blog because it is more readable to the
client, if they read urls...

my point was more that it was a bad default for us to choose, we
shouldve stuck with the query string. the current strategy still has
its applications

as far as the urls indexed you are right, the links wont be broken.
you can create rewrite rules for all your current mounts but that will
probably be a pita...

maybe we can patch the existing stuff to strip jsessionid before decoding.

as far as the trailing / - that causes its own problems because it
throws off relative urls.

-igor

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
 Ouch! All the pages are indexed under google with the /name1/value1 strategy 
 will this mean the google page links will break if we switch to 
 querystringurlcodingstrategy or can wicket handle resolution of both types of 
 strategies when it comes to responding to requests?

 I thought the thinking was that search engines indexed the /name1/value1 
 structure better than the query string ?name1=value1 because they look like 
 directories or is that old SEO thinking?

 Regards,
 Chris


 -Original Message-
 From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 10:53 AM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs

 i suggest always mounting with querystringurlcodingstrategy unless you
 specifically want the folder structure of /name1/value1/name2/value2
 which most of the time you dont. too bad this was made the default, we
 cant change it in 1.4 but are fixing it in 1.5 as it causes all kinds
 of problems.

 -igor

 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Chris Colman
 chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
  I'm using BookmarkablePageLink extensively as it makes it easy to add
  parameter name/value pairs. I end up with URLs like:
 
  www.mysite.com/p1/v1/p2/v2
 
  Which works fine for most cases but I have a number of questions/issues:
 
  My logs show exceptions whereby some browsers (or crawlers) without
  cookies enabled end up requesting URLs with the ;jessionid=... suffix
  which is used when no cookie support is available.
 
  The exception is caused when I try to convert a parameter and the
  session suffix is included in its value eg.,
 
  org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringValueConversionException: Unable to
  convert '4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC' to a long
  value
 
  The parameter pair was intended to be:
 
  parameter1/4574  i.e. parameter1=4574
 
  but with the suffix added by tomcat in the absence of cookies it became:
 
  parameter1/4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
 
  i.e. parameter1=4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
 
  which isn't a valid integer value and so causes an exception.
 
  What can we do about this? Is it possible to force wicket to always add
  a trailing / because this would help wicket's parameter parser avoid
  this issue eg.,
 
  parameter1/4574/;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
 
  should work fine I'd imagine.
 
  Another thing about trailing slashes: apparently a trailing slash can
  avoid an redirect. Apparently:
 
  www.mysite.com/p1/v1 will be redirected to
  www.mysite.com/p1/v1/
 
  If the URL was simply www.mysite.com/p1/v1/ then the redirect is
  avoided.
 
 
  7%3Bjsessionid%3D3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 9:56 AM
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Subject: Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap
  locked
 
  the fix is in 1.4.x branch and will be part of 1.4.8.
 
  in the meantime you can build a fresh snapshot yourself and drop that
  into your application
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x
 
  -igor
 
  On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Parker
  nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
  wrote:
  
   Thank you Johan for your reply. Agree that original problem should
  be
  fixed.
   This is a critical problem for us. We have found out during the last
  24
   hours that some of our pages are retaining a session reference. With
  Ajax
   requests this gives a doubling of session size for every request,
  and we
  now
   believe this to be the cause of the StackOverflowErrors. We will try
  this in
   production tomorrow.
  
   We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked
  when
  the
   stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?
  
   Thanks
   Nigel
  
  
   Johan Compagner wrote:
  
   i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.
  
   Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page
  is
  not
   in
   a valid state in the session.
   So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that
  doesnt
   work
  
   So what should be fixed is the original problem

RE: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs

 that is mostly old seo thinking. some people still prerfer urls like
 
 /blog/entry/2007/my_awesome_blog because it is more readable to the
 client, if they read urls...

Yes, they probably don't read URLs anyway.

 as far as the urls indexed you are right, the links wont be broken.
 you can create rewrite rules for all your current mounts but that will
 probably be a pita...

Does this mean the links won't be broken if I simply change the strategy to 
query string and do nothing else or does it mean the links won't be broken if 
create rewrite rules for all current mounts?

 
 maybe we can patch the existing stuff to strip jsessionid before decoding.

Yes that would be cool. It's only really tomcat that needs to see the jessionid 
- after that point in the request lifecycle there's no need to keep the 
jsessionid in the URL.

 
 as far as the trailing / - that causes its own problems because it
 throws off relative urls.
 
 -igor
 
 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Chris Colman
 chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
  Ouch! All the pages are indexed under google with the /name1/value1
 strategy will this mean the google page links will break if we switch to
 querystringurlcodingstrategy or can wicket handle resolution of both types
 of strategies when it comes to responding to requests?
 
  I thought the thinking was that search engines indexed the /name1/value1
 structure better than the query string ?name1=value1 because they look
 like directories or is that old SEO thinking?
 
  Regards,
  Chris
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 10:53 AM
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Subject: Re: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs
 
  i suggest always mounting with querystringurlcodingstrategy unless you
  specifically want the folder structure of /name1/value1/name2/value2
  which most of the time you dont. too bad this was made the default, we
  cant change it in 1.4 but are fixing it in 1.5 as it causes all kinds
  of problems.
 
  -igor
 
  On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Chris Colman
  chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
   I'm using BookmarkablePageLink extensively as it makes it easy to add
   parameter name/value pairs. I end up with URLs like:
  
   www.mysite.com/p1/v1/p2/v2
  
   Which works fine for most cases but I have a number of
 questions/issues:
  
   My logs show exceptions whereby some browsers (or crawlers) without
   cookies enabled end up requesting URLs with the ;jessionid=... suffix
   which is used when no cookie support is available.
  
   The exception is caused when I try to convert a parameter and the
   session suffix is included in its value eg.,
  
   org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringValueConversionException: Unable
 to
   convert '4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC' to a long
   value
  
   The parameter pair was intended to be:
  
   parameter1/4574  i.e. parameter1=4574
  
   but with the suffix added by tomcat in the absence of cookies it
 became:
  
   parameter1/4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
  
   i.e. parameter1=4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
  
   which isn't a valid integer value and so causes an exception.
  
   What can we do about this? Is it possible to force wicket to always
 add
   a trailing / because this would help wicket's parameter parser avoid
   this issue eg.,
  
   parameter1/4574/;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
  
   should work fine I'd imagine.
  
   Another thing about trailing slashes: apparently a trailing slash can
   avoid an redirect. Apparently:
  
   www.mysite.com/p1/v1 will be redirected to
   www.mysite.com/p1/v1/
  
   If the URL was simply www.mysite.com/p1/v1/ then the redirect is
   avoided.
  
  
   7%3Bjsessionid%3D3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
   Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 9:56 AM
   To: users@wicket.apache.org
   Subject: Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap
   locked
  
   the fix is in 1.4.x branch and will be part of 1.4.8.
  
   in the meantime you can build a fresh snapshot yourself and drop
 that
   into your application
  
   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x
  
   -igor
  
   On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Parker
   nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
   wrote:
   
Thank you Johan for your reply. Agree that original problem should
   be
   fixed.
This is a critical problem for us. We have found out during the
 last
   24
hours that some of our pages are retaining a session reference.
 With
   Ajax
requests this gives a doubling of session size for every request,
   and we
   now
believe this to be the cause of the StackOverflowErrors. We will
 try
   this in
production tomorrow.
   
We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked
   when
   the
stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to

Re: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
 that is mostly old seo thinking. some people still prerfer urls like

 /blog/entry/2007/my_awesome_blog because it is more readable to the
 client, if they read urls...

 Yes, they probably don't read URLs anyway.

 as far as the urls indexed you are right, the links wont be broken.
 you can create rewrite rules for all your current mounts but that will
 probably be a pita...

 Does this mean the links won't be broken if I simply change the strategy to 
 query string and do nothing else or does it mean the links won't be broken if 
 create rewrite rules for all current mounts?

sorry, i meant they *will* be broken. thus the url rewrite rules...

 maybe we can patch the existing stuff to strip jsessionid before decoding.

 Yes that would be cool. It's only really tomcat that needs to see the 
 jessionid - after that point in the request lifecycle there's no need to keep 
 the jsessionid in the URL.

all servlet containers do that on first request. if you dont care
about browsers with cookies disabled you can tweak tomcat to never
append jsessionid to the url, afair there is a setting for that.

-igor



 as far as the trailing / - that causes its own problems because it
 throws off relative urls.

 -igor

 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Chris Colman
 chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
  Ouch! All the pages are indexed under google with the /name1/value1
 strategy will this mean the google page links will break if we switch to
 querystringurlcodingstrategy or can wicket handle resolution of both types
 of strategies when it comes to responding to requests?
 
  I thought the thinking was that search engines indexed the /name1/value1
 structure better than the query string ?name1=value1 because they look
 like directories or is that old SEO thinking?
 
  Regards,
  Chris
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 10:53 AM
  To: users@wicket.apache.org
  Subject: Re: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs
 
  i suggest always mounting with querystringurlcodingstrategy unless you
  specifically want the folder structure of /name1/value1/name2/value2
  which most of the time you dont. too bad this was made the default, we
  cant change it in 1.4 but are fixing it in 1.5 as it causes all kinds
  of problems.
 
  -igor
 
  On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Chris Colman
  chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
   I'm using BookmarkablePageLink extensively as it makes it easy to add
   parameter name/value pairs. I end up with URLs like:
  
   www.mysite.com/p1/v1/p2/v2
  
   Which works fine for most cases but I have a number of
 questions/issues:
  
   My logs show exceptions whereby some browsers (or crawlers) without
   cookies enabled end up requesting URLs with the ;jessionid=... suffix
   which is used when no cookie support is available.
  
   The exception is caused when I try to convert a parameter and the
   session suffix is included in its value eg.,
  
   org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringValueConversionException: Unable
 to
   convert '4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC' to a long
   value
  
   The parameter pair was intended to be:
  
   parameter1/4574  i.e. parameter1=4574
  
   but with the suffix added by tomcat in the absence of cookies it
 became:
  
   parameter1/4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
  
   i.e. parameter1=4574;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
  
   which isn't a valid integer value and so causes an exception.
  
   What can we do about this? Is it possible to force wicket to always
 add
   a trailing / because this would help wicket's parameter parser avoid
   this issue eg.,
  
   parameter1/4574/;jsessionid=3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
  
   should work fine I'd imagine.
  
   Another thing about trailing slashes: apparently a trailing slash can
   avoid an redirect. Apparently:
  
   www.mysite.com/p1/v1 will be redirected to
   www.mysite.com/p1/v1/
  
   If the URL was simply www.mysite.com/p1/v1/ then the redirect is
   avoided.
  
  
   7%3Bjsessionid%3D3359BBC174E43EF2AE12D7F8FA80FCEC
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
   Sent: Friday, 19 March 2010 9:56 AM
   To: users@wicket.apache.org
   Subject: Re: StackOverflowError under serialization leaves pagemap
   locked
  
   the fix is in 1.4.x branch and will be part of 1.4.8.
  
   in the meantime you can build a fresh snapshot yourself and drop
 that
   into your application
  
   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x
  
   -igor
  
   On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Parker
   nigel.par...@mazeppa.no
   wrote:
   
Thank you Johan for your reply. Agree that original problem should
   be
   fixed.
This is a critical problem for us. We have found out during the
 last
   24
hours that some of our pages are retaining a session

JCaptcha sound with Wicket?

Based on the WIA book, I am able to have a working example of JCaptcha image.

I am hoping to get JCaptcha sound working too. I tried different ways, but 
unable to get it working.

Did anyone get JCaptcha sound working with Wicket? Could you please share your 
config and code?

Thanks for any input!

Best.


  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: Trailing / on parameter name/value pairs