Re: [videoblogging] Re: Best Overal Digital Video Format
Hello Harold,Just another point (that I forgot to mention before). If you want to support Ogg Theora video, but are worried that browsers won't support it, you could always use the Free and open source applet that plays it. You can get more info here: Cortadohttp://www.flumotion.net/cortado/(It's akin to the Flash video player people are using. But works with Ogg Theora.) See yaOn 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,If you implement the MPEG4 standard then you have to pay someone a tax to use it. Specifically, you have to pay these guys: http://www.mpegla.com/MPEG4 is NOT an open standard.See yaOn 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't MPEG4 an open source format?Or is that open standard?(Or both?)HaroldOn 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello, Currently, I don't think there is one defacto standard video format. There's a whole set of formats that are currently being used: MPEG WMV QuickTime (.mov) M4V (iPod) MP4 (MPEG4) FLV (Flash Video) RM (Real Media) Xivd Ogg Theora Most vlogs I go to regularly support around 4 of these formats. Everyone seems to be trying to support as much as possible to get the widest possible audience. Honestly, I think it's early enough in the game where we can influence and perhaps even determine which format will become the defacto standard. As soon as you get enough browsers/players reading it, and get enough free (and maybe non-free) vlog hosting providers producing it, it will become the defacto standard. See ya On 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles, This is the first I've heard of Ogg Theora, and I am *into* open source; that is, I run Linux on a PC and on an old Powerbook at home, though I can't say I use it every day (or even every week or month, for that matter).I have my doubts that Ogg Theora will become the de facto standard; I mean, look at Ogg Vorbis.How many of you (reading this) even know what Ogg Vorbis is? You're perhaps right, however, about one format or another becoming the de facto standard in the future.Look at what happened with Flash; now you'll find it installed in nearly every browser out there. And though I admire your idealism about Ogg and its future, which format do you think is the *current* de facto standard? Thanks for your feedback, Harold On 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I think the only way to really make all (or most) browsers support one standard video format is to force them. Basically, we do this by making a single video format the defacto standard. In other words, all of us vloggers just start using one video format, and eventually, the browser makers will feel compelled to support that format. Now, this doesn't mean that we don't support other formats.It just means that as a baseline we always support that one video format. (My vote is for Ogg Theora to be the defacto standard for the reasons I previously mentioned.) If you want an example of this working Just look at RSS.It's now being supported by all the browsers because it was a defacto standard. I.e., the browsers added support for RSS because everyone was using it. See ya On 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish there was a format that played great online on most browsers (which would still be IE, unfortunately) and played just as well on the video iPod and the Creative Zen Vision:M device... Harold On 4/4/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3ivx creates mp4 with AAC that's compatible with quicktime 6 7, iPod and I suspect also the PSP player.It also looks quite good with dual pass encoding. -- Enric -==- http://www.cirne.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your response, Enric.How in particular do you fing 3ivx fits the criteria? Harold On 4/4/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3ivx...though I haven't tried iton PSP, it fits the other criteria.-- Enric--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Peter Van Dijckpetervandijck@ wrote: I want an answer too. I suspect it's a certain encoding for mp4. Something that plays on older quicktime installs. And on the video iPod (and the PSP if possible). Peter On 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, IMO, it's Ogg Theora. You can see why here: http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv See ya On 4/3/06, Harold Johnson harold.johnson@ wrote:Okay, I suspect this one has probably been debated a gazillion mazillion
[videoblogging] Best Overall Overalls?
What do you all think are the best overall overalls? My Osh Kosh are fairly worn out, and I'm not certain they're still hip to wear... Thanks, Harold Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: vlogweek 2006 - technorati tag in fireant?
Hello Harold,I use IceRocket. And I like them.In particular, I like it that you don't have to signup for an account just to get at the RSS feed for a tag or search. (Technorati makes you signup for an account.) See yaOn 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IceRocket's tags are working, at least:http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/videobloggingweek2006I've never used IceRocket before, though.Is this a decent blog search engine? HaroldOn 4/4/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:i've seen your day one vid there on page 5, there's so many nowclick 'More Posts tagged videobloggingweek2006 at bottom of technorati tag pageryanne hodson wrote:i can't see jay or my posts in technorati...whats up with that?i swear i'm totally tagging these right...a href="" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/videobloggingweek2006">http://www.technorati.com/tag/videobloggingweek2006 rel=tagvideobloggingweek2006/aplease tell me what i could be doing wrong... -ryanne On 4/4/06, usadutch2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My vlog from tonight popped up in technorati within 30 minutes. I'm using wordpress and configured to ping technorati at this address;http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/pingif you use wordpress go to options-writing and put this link in the Update Services form.blipshttp://vlogmatic.com--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Harold Johnson[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill, the last time I used Technorati tags regularly (which was afew months ago), I rarely had any problems.Seems our Videoblogging Week 2006 has met with some Technorati resistance this week... Harold On 4/4/06, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought it was just me but I have never been able to get a technorati tag feed to work ever. del.icio.us yes, technoratino. But I thought it was just me. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, duncanduncan.kleindesign@ wrote: has anyone managed to get fireant to download videos from the technorati tag 'videobloggingweek2006', it keeps saying no new videos found?what's the alternative method to subscribe? at present i'm just subscribed to technorati in an RSS reader.[...]-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Best Overal Digital Video Format
Hello,If you implement the MPEG4 standard then you have to pay someone a tax to use it. Specifically, you have to pay these guys: http://www.mpegla.com/MPEG4 is NOT an open standard.See yaOn 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't MPEG4 an open source format?Or is that open standard?(Or both?)HaroldOn 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello, Currently, I don't think there is one defacto standard video format. There's a whole set of formats that are currently being used: MPEG WMV QuickTime (.mov) M4V (iPod) MP4 (MPEG4) FLV (Flash Video) RM (Real Media) Xivd Ogg Theora Most vlogs I go to regularly support around 4 of these formats. Everyone seems to be trying to support as much as possible to get the widest possible audience. Honestly, I think it's early enough in the game where we can influence and perhaps even determine which format will become the defacto standard. As soon as you get enough browsers/players reading it, and get enough free (and maybe non-free) vlog hosting providers producing it, it will become the defacto standard. See ya On 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles, This is the first I've heard of Ogg Theora, and I am *into* open source; that is, I run Linux on a PC and on an old Powerbook at home, though I can't say I use it every day (or even every week or month, for that matter).I have my doubts that Ogg Theora will become the de facto standard; I mean, look at Ogg Vorbis.How many of you (reading this) even know what Ogg Vorbis is? You're perhaps right, however, about one format or another becoming the de facto standard in the future.Look at what happened with Flash; now you'll find it installed in nearly every browser out there. And though I admire your idealism about Ogg and its future, which format do you think is the *current* de facto standard? Thanks for your feedback, Harold On 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I think the only way to really make all (or most) browsers support one standard video format is to force them. Basically, we do this by making a single video format the defacto standard. In other words, all of us vloggers just start using one video format, and eventually, the browser makers will feel compelled to support that format. Now, this doesn't mean that we don't support other formats.It just means that as a baseline we always support that one video format. (My vote is for Ogg Theora to be the defacto standard for the reasons I previously mentioned.) If you want an example of this working Just look at RSS.It's now being supported by all the browsers because it was a defacto standard. I.e., the browsers added support for RSS because everyone was using it. See ya On 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish there was a format that played great online on most browsers (which would still be IE, unfortunately) and played just as well on the video iPod and the Creative Zen Vision:M device... Harold On 4/4/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3ivx creates mp4 with AAC that's compatible with quicktime 6 7, iPod and I suspect also the PSP player.It also looks quite good with dual pass encoding. -- Enric -==- http://www.cirne.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your response, Enric.How in particular do you fing 3ivx fits the criteria? Harold On 4/4/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3ivx...though I haven't tried iton PSP, it fits the other criteria.-- Enric--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Peter Van Dijckpetervandijck@ wrote: I want an answer too. I suspect it's a certain encoding for mp4. Something that plays on older quicktime installs. And on the video iPod (and the PSP if possible). Peter On 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, IMO, it's Ogg Theora. You can see why here: http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv See ya On 4/3/06, Harold Johnson harold.johnson@ wrote:Okay, I suspect this one has probably been debated a gazillion mazillion times, but I'm going to introduce the topic anyway: At this point in time, what do you think is the best overall digital video format for videoblogging? thanks, Harold[...]-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make
Re: [videoblogging] Unbiased Opinion Of Current Best Overall Video Aggegator
I'm not saying that it's the best over all other choices ... but the best video aggregator _for me_ is iTunes ... I have a video iPod, a lot of the feeds I subscribe to are iPod-compatible, and I watch a lot of video on my iPod during downtime at work. The videos that don't play on my iPod get watched in iTunes when I'm actually sitting in front of my computer. I liked FireAnt when I used it in the past, but again ... because I tend to watch a lot of videos on my iPod, iTunes seemed to be the logical choice to do so with minimal effort. -- http://kellybelly.net On 4/5/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeking some sincere and unbiased opinionsof what you believe is the current best overall video aggegatoravailable. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Best Overal Digital Video Format
Hello,Or you could suggest to your uses that they install VideoLAN -- http://www.videolan.org/(VideoLan supports playing Ogg Theora, as well as almost every other video format.) (There actually already seems to be quite a large install base for this already. So there's probably more people who can watch Ogg Theora movies than you expect.)See ya On 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Harold,Just another point (that I forgot to mention before). If you want to support Ogg Theora video, but are worried that browsers won't support it, you could always use the Free and open source applet that plays it. You can get more info here: Cortadohttp://www.flumotion.net/cortado/(It's akin to the Flash video player people are using. But works with Ogg Theora.) See yaOn 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,If you implement the MPEG4 standard then you have to pay someone a tax to use it. Specifically, you have to pay these guys: http://www.mpegla.com/MPEG4 is NOT an open standard.See yaOn 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't MPEG4 an open source format?Or is that open standard?(Or both?)HaroldOn 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello, Currently, I don't think there is one defacto standard video format. There's a whole set of formats that are currently being used: MPEG WMV QuickTime (.mov) M4V (iPod) MP4 (MPEG4) FLV (Flash Video) RM (Real Media) Xivd Ogg Theora Most vlogs I go to regularly support around 4 of these formats. Everyone seems to be trying to support as much as possible to get the widest possible audience. Honestly, I think it's early enough in the game where we can influence and perhaps even determine which format will become the defacto standard. As soon as you get enough browsers/players reading it, and get enough free (and maybe non-free) vlog hosting providers producing it, it will become the defacto standard. See ya On 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles, This is the first I've heard of Ogg Theora, and I am *into* open source; that is, I run Linux on a PC and on an old Powerbook at home, though I can't say I use it every day (or even every week or month, for that matter).I have my doubts that Ogg Theora will become the de facto standard; I mean, look at Ogg Vorbis.How many of you (reading this) even know what Ogg Vorbis is? You're perhaps right, however, about one format or another becoming the de facto standard in the future.Look at what happened with Flash; now you'll find it installed in nearly every browser out there. And though I admire your idealism about Ogg and its future, which format do you think is the *current* de facto standard? Thanks for your feedback, Harold On 4/4/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I think the only way to really make all (or most) browsers support one standard video format is to force them. Basically, we do this by making a single video format the defacto standard. In other words, all of us vloggers just start using one video format, and eventually, the browser makers will feel compelled to support that format. Now, this doesn't mean that we don't support other formats.It just means that as a baseline we always support that one video format. (My vote is for Ogg Theora to be the defacto standard for the reasons I previously mentioned.) If you want an example of this working Just look at RSS.It's now being supported by all the browsers because it was a defacto standard. I.e., the browsers added support for RSS because everyone was using it. See ya On 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish there was a format that played great online on most browsers (which would still be IE, unfortunately) and played just as well on the video iPod and the Creative Zen Vision:M device... Harold On 4/4/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3ivx creates mp4 with AAC that's compatible with quicktime 6 7, iPod and I suspect also the PSP player.It also looks quite good with dual pass encoding. -- Enric -==- http://www.cirne.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your response, Enric.How in particular do you fing 3ivx fits the criteria? Harold On 4/4/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3ivx...though I haven't tried iton PSP, it fits the other criteria.-- Enric--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Peter Van Dijckpetervandijck@ wrote: I want an answer too. I suspect it's a certain encoding for mp4. Something that plays on older quicktime installs. And on the video iPod (and the PSP if possible). Peter On 4/4/06, Charles Iliya
Re: [videoblogging] Unbiased Opinion Of Current Best Overall Video Aggegator
Since I use videoblogs differently than Kelly I'll weigh in too. I use iTunes for podcasts because I transfer those to my ipod for listening and because I never go back to read/write comments on the podcasts I listen to. With videos iTunes doesn't work at all for me. There's no way to et back to the blog etry to read/write comments. I use the RSS reader that's built into my browser. I read whatever text is included in each blog entry and if it sounds interesting I'll click through to the blog entry and view the video in my browser. My perfect RSS reader is one that is as tightly integrated with my browser as possible. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:41:18 +0200, Kelly Skoty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not saying that it's the best over all other choices ... but the best video aggregator _for me_ is iTunes ... I have a video iPod, a lot of the feeds I subscribe to are iPod-compatible, and I watch a lot of video on my iPod during downtime at work. The videos that don't play on my iPod get watched in iTunes when I'm actually sitting in front of my computer. I liked FireAnt when I used it in the past, but again ... because I tend to watch a lot of videos on my iPod, iTunes seemed to be the logical choice to do so with minimal effort. -- http://kellybelly.net On 4/5/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeking some sincere and unbiased opinions of what you believe is the current best overall video aggegator available. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Videoblogging Week 2006: Vloggers Participating in Videoblogging Week 2006
Hello friends! I've updated the Videoblogging Week 2006 blog with a post about watching everyone's videos. Vloggers Participating in Videoblogging Week 2006 http://videobloggingweek2006.blogspot.com/2006/04/vloggers- participating-in.html It gives visitors a way to see everyone who is participating using the work of Aidan, Stephanie and Andy. Please use the comments section over there to post any other ways that you use to keep track of the new videos. This project has made it clear to me that there needs to be better ways for groups like this to keep track of new videos. The videobloggingweek2006 tag is a filter, a trusted filter that we all want to use to be able to see new videos, but the distribution mechanism isn't quite yet up to par. Hopefully we can figure something out... --Steve -- http://SteveGarfield.com http://Rocketboom.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Videoblogging Week 2006
It's Wednesday a.m. and its already been a very long week for a lot of us. I understand that there have been technical issues with some of the 3rd-party services that many of us here have tried to use. All we want to do is be included in the list of participants and see what others are contributing to the event. Thankfully, there's no more technical nonsense for anyone to deal with. There is a system at: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/add.asp Add your video blog's URL, RSS feed and name and you're done. Every 30 minutes it will check to see if you have added a new post. If it finds one, it will add it to the master list. There are links there for you to monitor as well as an RSS feed for you to point your feed reader to. Contact me directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you run into any difficulties. Thanks for your patience, and happy vlogging. Aidan Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week/Dangerous: Day 3 and URLs
Maybe the most important part is that there is a River of News page that compiles everyone's posts into one page for reading: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/listposts.asp It's getting there... On Apr 4, 2006, at 11:26 PM, Stephanie Bryant wrote: First, let's get the URLs out there: The VlogWeek feeds of feeds: New feed: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/rss.php Add your vlog to the feed: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/add.asp View HTML-based list: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/list.asp Aidan Owens put those together-- we're still working on the enclosure parts. Danger Vlog Idea for Day 3: Do something that's a real physical challenge for you and vlog it. --Stephanie -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogs Yahoo! Groups Links --Steve -- http://SteveGarfield.com http://Rocketboom.com My most recent post: VLOG SOUP: Episode 12 http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/2006/03/vlog_soup_episo.html You are worth like 50 million danishes. - Amy Carpenter Alternative reply address: stephen.garfield [AT] comcast.net Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Videoblogging Week 2006: Vloggers Participating in Videoblogging Week 2006
DIRECT LINK: http://videobloggingweek2006.blogspot.com/ On Apr 5, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Steve Garfield wrote: I've updated the Videoblogging Week 2006 blog with a post about watching everyone's videos. Vloggers Participating in Videoblogging Week 2006 http://videobloggingweek2006.blogspot.com/2006/04/vloggers- participating-in.html --Steve -- http://SteveGarfield.com http://Rocketboom.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] A vlogmap observation...
I just went and took a look at those stats and with a few exceptions most all the vlogs listed there seem to have flatlined. Even feeds that have had no videos for months have the same number of subscribers for the last 60 days. So what does that mean? -VerdiOn 4/3/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just looking at the Feedburner stats on vlogmap and realizedsomething... I bet all those participating in VB Week will jump up inthe ratings on the Feedburner stats this week.It should be fun towatch in a few days... perhaps regular vlogs will temporarily overtake all those skateboarding/snowboarding vids that have been riding highfor the past few months!Link: http://www.vlogmap.org/feedburner/Casey http://www.kitkast.com/Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Me: http://michaelverdi.com RD: http://evilvlog.comLearn to videoblog: http://freevlog.orgLearn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Videoblogging Week 2006
with enclosures? On Apr 5, 2006, at 7:20 AM, xicastmedia wrote: There are links there for you to monitor as well as an RSS feed for you to point your feed reader to. --Steve -- http://SteveGarfield.com http://Rocketboom.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Videoblogging Week 2006: Vloggers Participating in Videoblogging Week 2006
I would echo that comment that there needs to be better ways to track new videos..but I would also like to extend my thanks to all those who have worked very hard to index all those who are participating in vlog week 2006..I am no tech person I know enough...but you have done a fantastic job I just felt that I should say that Heath - Batman Geek http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello friends! I've updated the Videoblogging Week 2006 blog with a post about watching everyone's videos. Vloggers Participating in Videoblogging Week 2006 http://videobloggingweek2006.blogspot.com/2006/04/vloggers- participating-in.html It gives visitors a way to see everyone who is participating using the work of Aidan, Stephanie and Andy. Please use the comments section over there to post any other ways that you use to keep track of the new videos. This project has made it clear to me that there needs to be better ways for groups like this to keep track of new videos. The videobloggingweek2006 tag is a filter, a trusted filter that we all want to use to be able to see new videos, but the distribution mechanism isn't quite yet up to par. Hopefully we can figure something out... --Steve -- http://SteveGarfield.com http://Rocketboom.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: A vlogmap observation...
You're right, I used to think that multiple posts per week would have an effect on vlogmap, but it doesn't seem to (there's been no considerable change during vlog week so far). Although I hadn't posted any Kitkast stuff in three weeks (before vlog week) it's true that my numbers were staying constant and even increasing... so although it looks weird, I guess with people always looking for new content, the stats are pretty constant! One thing I find strange is when someone removes their feed from the public eye. Apparently there is an option in Feedburner that allows you to hide your stats from people (therefore removing it from vlogmap). Sometimes you see people's stats on vlogmap just hanging there while other stats keep going. I'm sure lots of people like to end their public stats on a high note before going to look for sponsorship! Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just went and took a look at those stats and with a few exceptions most all the vlogs listed there seem to have flatlined. Even feeds that have had no videos for months have the same number of subscribers for the last 60 days. So what does that mean? -Verdi On 4/3/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just looking at the Feedburner stats on vlogmap and realized something... I bet all those participating in VB Week will jump up in the ratings on the Feedburner stats this week. It should be fun to watch in a few days... perhaps regular vlogs will temporarily overtake all those skateboarding/snowboarding vids that have been riding high for the past few months! Link: http://www.vlogmap.org/feedburner/ Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links -- Me: http://michaelverdi.com RD: http://evilvlog.com Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Best Overall Overalls?
Overalls are totally hip. On 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you all think are the best overall overalls? My Osh Kosh are fairly worn out, and I'm not certain they're still hip to wear... -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogs Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] MF Jesus Vlog Link
Sorry about the bad vlog link it should have been http://veoh.com/vlogs/jesus I am creating a new one as well. MF Jesus Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Great new free site to announce newsworthy video clips to TV stations
I found this great site - if you capture something newsworthy with your cameraphone or video cell phone or camcorder and want to get it on TV, this site announces it to all of the network news stations and they pay you if they use your footage. It's a free site - http://www.videonewscaster.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Best Overall Overalls?
and they definitely "enclose", making them aggregator friendly Stephanie Bryant wrote: Overalls are totally hip. On 4/4/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you all think are the best overall overalls? My Osh Kosh are fairly worn out, and I'm not certain they're still hip to wear... -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogs Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ . -- Markus Sandy http://apperceptions.org http://spinflow.org YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: A vlogmap observation...
If most of your subscribers are using iTunes you are more likely to loose subscribers if you post more often. Because iTunes will automatically unsubscribe a feed if you don't watch or listen to 5 episodes in a row. So if you start posting everyday, from say, posting much less often than that, you're likely to start losing subscribers after awhile. This is what happened to me over my rerun month in February when I was posting every day--my subscriptions fell by about 30%. I knew about the iTunes thing before, so it wasn't a big surprise. The interesting thing is that my downloads went up over that period, so I didn't feel as bad about losing subscriptions. So just because someone is subscribed doesn't mean that they are actually watching. I actually think that it's more likely that someone is watching if they download manually. Here is another thing, if you have a lot of subscribers, and you stop posting for a while you're very likely to keep most of them over time. Why? Because if you never get anything from a feed how often are you likely to even think about it to unsubscribe from it? I probably have several dead subscriptions that I am subscribed to right now that I've never bothered to remove. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, I used to think that multiple posts per week would have an effect on vlogmap, but it doesn't seem to (there's been no considerable change during vlog week so far). Although I hadn't posted any Kitkast stuff in three weeks (before vlog week) it's true that my numbers were staying constant and even increasing... so although it looks weird, I guess with people always looking for new content, the stats are pretty constant! One thing I find strange is when someone removes their feed from the public eye. Apparently there is an option in Feedburner that allows you to hide your stats from people (therefore removing it from vlogmap). Sometimes you see people's stats on vlogmap just hanging there while other stats keep going. I'm sure lots of people like to end their public stats on a high note before going to look for sponsorship! Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@ wrote: I just went and took a look at those stats and with a few exceptions most all the vlogs listed there seem to have flatlined. Even feeds that have had no videos for months have the same number of subscribers for the last 60 days. So what does that mean? -Verdi On 4/3/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: I was just looking at the Feedburner stats on vlogmap and realized something... I bet all those participating in VB Week will jump up in the ratings on the Feedburner stats this week. It should be fun to watch in a few days... perhaps regular vlogs will temporarily overtake all those skateboarding/snowboarding vids that have been riding high for the past few months! Link: http://www.vlogmap.org/feedburner/ Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links -- Me: http://michaelverdi.com RD: http://evilvlog.com Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] HDD for Video Blogging?
We're thinking about starting a vlog. I read on Gizmodo the other day about Sony coming out with an HDD Handycam (the DCR-SR100). After reading about that, I also discovered the JVC already has a couple on the market (the Everio G Series). Do any of you currently use an HDD camcorder? What are the advantages? The cameras seem a little more expensive, but we wouldn't need to invest in any tapes, discs, or any other media, so it seems pretty appealing and ideal for doing a vlog. What do you think? Any and all help/opinions would be greatly appreciated as I'd love to get this thing going asap. Many thanks in advance! P.S. If not an HDD camera, what other kinds of cameras do current vloggers use that are reccomended? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com http://www.jchtv.com/ A vlog about craic, cocktails, travel, sailing and Philadelphia! __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Hello,On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it...Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he ownsall Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69(Warning, alot of what I wrote below contains alot of emotional reactions. And I'll probably regret writing this later. But anyways)I'm still in agreement with Keith and the Girl: http://shitecom.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=73950At no point in this interview does he actually talk about PodShow's contract. (With the skills of a politician and a spindoctor in avoiding the question) he just goes off and talks about other stuff. But never during the interview does he addresses any of the problematic points in the PodShow's contact that were identified by Keith and the Girl. Yes, I know these are harsh words. However, it bothers me that he tried to mislead people.After hearing what Keith and the Girl said, I didn't have any problems with PodShow or Adam Curry. I didn't see anything wrong with what he was doing. Now, I did NOT like the PodShow contact. And was grateful that Keith and the Girl educated me about the problems with it. But I still didn't see anything wrong with the PodShow. People still had a choice (to join it or not). It was up to them. Now that I've watch this interview with Adam Curry's response I have the same feeling I get after watching a politician talk. To be honest... and this may be an emotional reaction... I feel like I just watched an infomercial. He seems like he was trying to mislead me (and everyone else). And (personally) I just don't like that's he's trying to mislead people. If he just fessed up and admitted to the true nature of the PodShow contact then I'd still be OK it. But now, I feel more than just a dislike of the PodShow contact. (And yes, I know, I'll probably regret writing such harsh words in such a public place. But this is my honest opinion.)See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] HDD for Video Blogging?
SUGGESTION: I see this question posted often. I'm one of the ones who have asked a similar question. I rarely see it get answered because I suspect people roll their eyes and think "oh no--not again." What about posting a file with recommended cameras, in various price ranges,that people could refer to, so we don't all feel like dolts for asking questions that nobody answers. -- BevBlog: http://funnytheblog.blogspot.com/Journal: http://funnytheworld.com - Original Message - From: legrandmagistery To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 8:51 AM Subject: [videoblogging] HDD for Video Blogging? We're thinking about starting a vlog. I read on Gizmodo the other day about Sony coming out with an HDD Handycam (the DCR-SR100). After reading about that, I also discovered the JVC already has a couple on the market (the Everio G Series). Do any of you currently use an HDD camcorder? What are the advantages? The cameras seem a little more expensive, but we wouldn't need to invest in any tapes, discs, or any other media, so it seems pretty appealing and ideal for doing a vlog. What do you think? Any and all help/opinions would be greatly appreciated as I'd love to get this thing going asap. Many thanks in advance! P.S. If not an HDD camera, what other kinds of cameras do current vloggers use that are reccomended? YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: MF Jesus Vlog Link
The first link was bad, the second was fine... and this is a third link. One more link and this is considered spamming the group. Casey --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, jsonofgod1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry about the bad vlog link it should have been http://veoh.com/vlogs/jesus I am creating a new one as well. MF Jesus Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
The interview reminds me of what it would be if Condaleeza Rice were to interview George W! --- Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 (Warning, alot of what I wrote below contains alot of emotional reactions. And I'll probably regret writing this later. But anyways) I'm still in agreement with Keith and the Girl: http://shitecom.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=73950 At no point in this interview does he actually talk about PodShow's contract. (With the skills of a politician and a spindoctor in avoiding the question) he just goes off and talks about other stuff. But never during the interview does he addresses any of the problematic points in the PodShow's contact that were identified by Keith and the Girl. Yes, I know these are harsh words. However, it bothers me that he tried to mislead people. After hearing what Keith and the Girl said, I didn't have any problems with PodShow or Adam Curry. I didn't see anything wrong with what he was doing. Now, I did NOT like the PodShow contact. And was grateful that Keith and the Girl educated me about the problems with it. But I still didn't see anything wrong with the PodShow. People still had a choice (to join it or not). It was up to them. Now that I've watch this interview with Adam Curry's response I have the same feeling I get after watching a politician talk. To be honest... and this may be an emotional reaction... I feel like I just watched an infomercial. He seems like he was trying to mislead me (and everyone else). And (personally) I just don't like that's he's trying to mislead people. If he just fessed up and admitted to the true nature of the PodShow contact then I'd still be OK it. But now, I feel more than just a dislike of the PodShow contact. (And yes, I know, I'll probably regret writing such harsh words in such a public place. But this is my honest opinion.) See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ http://www.jchtv.com/ A vlog about craic, cocktails, travel, sailing and Philadelphia! __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] VideoBlogging Week 2006...better late than never...
FreeTime had to take a day off as Amy was getting back from San Jose on Monday. So, our Day #1 post went up in the wee hours of the morning of Day #2. Please add us around as necessary. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: HDD for Video Blogging?
I tend to be of the opinion that HD is just a little bit of overkill for a video blog. Mostly because it's very very unlikely that you would ever post full resolution HD footage on the internet--at least anytime soon. Given the additional resources needed for a HD workflow with the end result being just 320x240 highly compressed seems like a waste to me. HD is more than just an investment in a camera. Your editing system, hardware and software needs to be up to snuff to handle it as you'll use more hard drive space and processing power in handling HD. But that's just my opinion. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, legrandmagistery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're thinking about starting a vlog. I read on Gizmodo the other day about Sony coming out with an HDD Handycam (the DCR-SR100). After reading about that, I also discovered the JVC already has a couple on the market (the Everio G Series). Do any of you currently use an HDD camcorder? What are the advantages? The cameras seem a little more expensive, but we wouldn't need to invest in any tapes, discs, or any other media, so it seems pretty appealing and ideal for doing a vlog. What do you think? Any and all help/opinions would be greatly appreciated as I'd love to get this thing going asap. Many thanks in advance! P.S. If not an HDD camera, what other kinds of cameras do current vloggers use that are reccomended? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: HDD for Video Blogging?
Bill, Thanks for the comments. Much appreciated. However, HDD stands for Hard Disc Drive, not High Definition (actually, it is pretty confusing. They really should have made more of a differentiation between those two). With an HDD camcorder it's my understanding that you you don't need any tapes or discs or any other media to record onto. The camcorder houses a hard drive and you just record whenever and wherever and then plug the camera direct into the computer to upload your footage. I think HDD camcorders are available in both HD and SD (though maybe only SD right now?). --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tend to be of the opinion that HD is just a little bit of overkill for a video blog. Mostly because it's very very unlikely that you would ever post full resolution HD footage on the internet--at least anytime soon. Given the additional resources needed for a HD workflow with the end result being just 320x240 highly compressed seems like a waste to me. HD is more than just an investment in a camera. Your editing system, hardware and software needs to be up to snuff to handle it as you'll use more hard drive space and processing power in handling HD. But that's just my opinion. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, legrandmagistery magistery@ wrote: We're thinking about starting a vlog. I read on Gizmodo the other day about Sony coming out with an HDD Handycam (the DCR-SR100). After reading about that, I also discovered the JVC already has a couple on the market (the Everio G Series). Do any of you currently use an HDD camcorder? What are the advantages? The cameras seem a little more expensive, but we wouldn't need to invest in any tapes, discs, or any other media, so it seems pretty appealing and ideal for doing a vlog. What do you think? Any and all help/opinions would be greatly appreciated as I'd love to get this thing going asap. Many thanks in advance! P.S. If not an HDD camera, what other kinds of cameras do current vloggers use that are reccomended? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
i forget is the issue about post contract termination, expiration and release?On 4/5/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal.And it showswhere's the hard questions?On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he ownsall Podshow producers' content:http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web.To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.--~Devlonhttp://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodnesshttp://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcastshttp://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.comYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Sullhttp://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] VideoBlogging Week 2006...better late than never...
I couldn't get your FireAnt feed link to work. Can you check on it or post your feed's URL? I update the OPML every night. You can also add yourself to the mega-feed: Add your vlog to the feed: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/add.asp [It takes 30 minutes to show up.] Mega-feed: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/rss.php View HTML-based list: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/list.asp View River of Posts: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/listposts.asp OPML to import all the feeds to your reader: http://www.mortaine.com/Video/VlogWeek.opml --Stephanie On 4/5/06, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FreeTime had to take a day off as Amy was getting back from San Jose on Monday. So, our Day #1 post went up in the wee hours of the morning of Day #2. Please add us around as necessary. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime Yahoo! Groups Links -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogs Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] VideoBlogging Week 2006...better late than never...
Stephanie Bryant wrote: I couldn't get your FireAnt feed link to work. Can you check on it or post your feed's URL? Our video-only feed is http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime/bm/rss.php?i=1 I submitted to FireAnt a week ago...and I'm still not up there? Thanks for letting me know. I've emailed the FireAnt team. I am on Mefeedia, though. And I added myself to the mega-feed. -- Rhett. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] VideoBlogging Week 2006...better late than never...
I meant the link on your vlog page. When I add to the OPML, I go to the vlog web page and find the link there. --Stephanie On 4/5/06, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephanie Bryant wrote: I couldn't get your FireAnt feed link to work. Can you check on it or post your feed's URL? Our video-only feed is http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime/bm/rss.php?i=1 I submitted to FireAnt a week ago...and I'm still not up there? Thanks for letting me know. I've emailed the FireAnt team. I am on Mefeedia, though. And I added myself to the mega-feed. -- Rhett. Yahoo! Groups Links -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogs Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: HDD for Video Blogging?
You know after I posted this I was wondering if this was what you were talking about. DOH!! I've heard that if you are a Mac user the HDD cams are kind of a pain in the arse to work with. But I like the idea of a tapeless workflow. I know that a lot of vloggers have been using a tapeless workflow for a while already using cameras that write to flash memory cards. So yeah HDD cams would seem to make some sense for vlogging. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Le Grand Magistery, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill, Thanks for the comments. Much appreciated. However, HDD stands for Hard Disc Drive, not High Definition (actually, it is pretty confusing. They really should have made more of a differentiation between those two). With an HDD camcorder it's my understanding that you you don't need any tapes or discs or any other media to record onto. The camcorder houses a hard drive and you just record whenever and wherever and then plug the camera direct into the computer to upload your footage. I think HDD camcorders are available in both HD and SD (though maybe only SD right now?). --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter bill@ wrote: I tend to be of the opinion that HD is just a little bit of overkill for a video blog. Mostly because it's very very unlikely that you would ever post full resolution HD footage on the internet--at least anytime soon. Given the additional resources needed for a HD workflow with the end result being just 320x240 highly compressed seems like a waste to me. HD is more than just an investment in a camera. Your editing system, hardware and software needs to be up to snuff to handle it as you'll use more hard drive space and processing power in handling HD. But that's just my opinion. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, legrandmagistery magistery@ wrote: We're thinking about starting a vlog. I read on Gizmodo the other day about Sony coming out with an HDD Handycam (the DCR-SR100). After reading about that, I also discovered the JVC already has a couple on the market (the Everio G Series). Do any of you currently use an HDD camcorder? What are the advantages? The cameras seem a little more expensive, but we wouldn't need to invest in any tapes, discs, or any other media, so it seems pretty appealing and ideal for doing a vlog. What do you think? Any and all help/opinions would be greatly appreciated as I'd love to get this thing going asap. Many thanks in advance! P.S. If not an HDD camera, what other kinds of cameras do current vloggers use that are reccomended? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Hello,There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too.See yaOn 4/5/06, john coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk checkout Podcast 411http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/--- Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal.And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/[...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Yeah, I just posted a similar comment on that post on the site. If that is thier statement (they own the content) then say it out-right. On 4/5/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Danger Vlogging: Day 2
yeah ... sad ... I'm missing, and I've tried tagging and pinging technoratti a zillion different ways :(richardshow.comOn 4/4/06, Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at the technorati feed a few hours ago, I counted just over 50different vloggers who'd contributed content since yesterday. Pleasepardon any spelling mistakes or missing names.88slide90 seconds of dave 93mmandreas haugstupandy carvinanthony ruizbethany mckenneybitlab malmobk's videoblips usabrockvlogbullemheadcarl weaverchris danielChris Eneratadavid kolendadavid meade david howelldigital buddhaduncan rawlinsonheath parkshonto ni attahuman dog labjaap stronksjeff marquisjennifer proctorjohnie onejoshua seidenKevin Limlast minuteLaura Louise lostandfragilelukas blakkmediacritymichael caroe andersenmichael tyasmichael verdiMr MiyagiMs kitkanick taypete prodoehlpollasreality sandwichroxanne darlingrob parrish shooting full forcesteve garfieldtechnology voiceurban vancouverwayuptownxgoofxgoofxxolo.tvandy carvinwww.andycarvin.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ryan Ozawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because whatever I do, I can't get Technorati to pick up my updates, let alone my tags (even with a successful 'claim' set up), I too would apprecate an add to your special feed: http://www.lightfantastic.org/imr/extras/videoblog/ http://www.lightfantastic.org/imr/extras/videoblog/index.xml Thanks, Stephanie! -- Ryan HawaiiVogYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Richard http://www.richardshow.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: A vlogmap observation...
...while watching a midget ride by on a unicycle? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: or while lip-synching to Backstreet Boys... or while washing a monkey that is also washing a cat! -Josh On 4/3/06, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've never seen you skateboard/snowboard in your videos... But if you did, yer stats would go through the roof! To the moon! (especially if you did it while juggling) schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://vloggercon.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: I was just looking at the Feedburner stats on vlogmap and realized something... I bet all those participating in VB Week will jump up in the ratings on the Feedburner stats this week. It should be fun to watch in a few days... perhaps regular vlogs will temporarily overtake all those skateboarding/snowboarding vids that have been riding high for the past few months! Link: http://www.vlogmap.org/feedburner/ Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Great content crap result advise needed
Blips,The best strategy I found, when using premier elements was:1) for .mov, export the uncompressed file (export movie), then open this file in quicktime pro (costs $30), then export using compressions on freevlog freevlog.org2) for .wmv use the adobe compressor thingy (can't remember the name) and just use the settings for high quality dsl... Richard On 4/4/06, usadutch2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I made this great video this morning for the video blogging week 2006but the endresult looks likecrap, can someone take a look at it andmaybe advise me on the settings for MOV and MWV files?I use adobe premiere elements 2.0Someone can tell me what's wrong with it ?I use a decent camera; Panasonic GS150 3 ccd and I do not reuse tape.thanksblipshttp://vlogmatic.com Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Richard http://www.richardshow.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Danger Vlogging: Day 2
I'm missing too, though I found myself on technorati. -- BevBlog: http://funnytheblog.blogspot.com/Journal: http://funnytheworld.com - Original Message - From: Richard Show To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Danger Vlogging: Day 2 yeah ... sad ... I'm missing, and I've tried tagging and pinging technoratti a zillion different ways :(richardshow.com On 4/4/06, Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at the technorati feed a few hours ago, I counted just over 50different vloggers who'd contributed content since yesterday. Pleasepardon any spelling mistakes or missing names.88slide90 seconds of dave 93mmandreas haugstupandy carvinanthony ruizbethany mckenneybitlab malmobk's videoblips usabrockvlogbullemheadcarl weaverchris danielChris Eneratadavid kolendadavid meade david howelldigital buddhaduncan rawlinsonheath parkshonto ni attahuman dog labjaap stronksjeff marquisjennifer proctorjohnie onejoshua seidenKevin Limlast minuteLaura Louise lostandfragilelukas blakkmediacritymichael caroe andersenmichael tyasmichael verdiMr MiyagiMs kitkanick taypete prodoehlpollasreality sandwichroxanne darlingrob parrish shooting full forcesteve garfieldtechnology voiceurban vancouverwayuptownxgoofxgoofxxolo.tvandy carvinwww.andycarvin.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Ryan Ozawa" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because whatever I do, I can't get Technorati to pick up my updates, let alone my tags (even with a successful 'claim' set up), I too would apprecate an add to your special feed: http://www.lightfantastic.org/imr/extras/videoblog/ http://www.lightfantastic.org/imr/extras/videoblog/index.xml Thanks, Stephanie! -- Ryan HawaiiVogYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Richard http://www.richardshow.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] What's Up with You Tube?
Are they revamping, bought out? Re-Design? Down? All of the Above? JDonnelly madpod.com dummycast.com techY2.com Petsonboard.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Great content crap result advise needed
Richard is coorect on how to properly export from Elements. For some reason, exporting to .mov files from within any NLE always seems to make garbage Quicktime movies. No idea why that is? David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Blips, The best strategy I found, when using premier elements was: 1) for .mov, export the uncompressed file (export movie), then open this file in quicktime pro (costs $30), then export using compressions on freevlog freevlog.org 2) for .wmv use the adobe compressor thingy (can't remember the name) and just use the settings for high quality dsl ... Richard On 4/4/06, usadutch2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I made this great video this morning for the video blogging week 2006 but the endresult looks like crap, can someone take a look at it and maybe advise me on the settings for MOV and MWV files? I use adobe premiere elements 2.0 Someone can tell me what's wrong with it ? I use a decent camera; Panasonic GS150 3 ccd and I do not reuse tape. thanks blips http://vlogmatic.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week: URLs and such
Steph,I went to fireAnt and did add new channel and put in the urlhttp://www.mortaine.com/Video/VlogWeek.opmland got this error Error downloading and parsing channel feed(I'm using fireAnt for Mac)... what did I do wrong?... thanks for setting this up, by the way ... Richard On 4/4/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're working on the RSS/web page URL and should have something by theend of the day.I have a FireAnt-generated OPML file of all the valid feeds athttp://www.mortaine.com//Video/VlogWeek.opml , so you can import themquickly (I hope) to your vlog viewing program of choice.These are the videoblogs for which I couldn't find valid feeds or anyfeed or they weren't responding:Anne Walk http://nopractice.blogspot.com --NO FEED?Magic Monkey Bobhttp://magicmonkeybob.blogspot.com/ --NO FEED?Susan http://kitykity.blogspot.com/ --NO FEED?Ted Tagamihttp://www.tagami.com --FEED (invalid)Trine http://davidandtrine.org -- NOT RESPONDINGIf you have a feed for your vlog and I missed it, just drop me a lineso I can add it to the OPML file and, later the mega-feed.--Stephanie--Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at:http://www.mortaine.com/blogsYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Thursday: talking about my new book at the Harvard Berkman Center
Hi everyone, At 7pm on Thursday, April 6, I'm going to be giving a preview of my new book, From the Ground Up: Evolution of the Telecentre Movement, at the Harvard Berkman Center for Internet Society. Every Thursday, a group of local bloggers get together to discuss Internet issues, and I'll be talking about the book for this week's meeting. The book, edited by me and Mark Surman of Telecentre.org, explores the diversity of public computing initiatives around the world, examining the common visions and goals that unite them. It's intended to inspire technology activists to realize that they're part of a worldwide movement to bridge the digital divide, rather than working in isolation. The USA chapter focuses on Lowell Telecommunications Corporation in Lowell, MA, and includes quotes from our fellow vlogger Randy Mann. The book will be distributed this spring by IDRC.ca in Canada, but for now you can review a very large PDF version (It's around 10 megabytes - a necessary evil given the hundreds of photographs in the book.) An accessible HTML version will be made available when IDRC begins distributing the book. http://www.andycarvin.com/from-the-ground-up.pdf I've also posted screen shots from the book on my blog: http://www.andycarvin.com permalink: http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2006/04/talking_about_my_new.html If you happen to be in the Boston area, please feel free to join us Thursday evening at Berkman. It'll take place at 7 PM at Baker House, 1587 Massachusetts Ave. in Cambridge, north of Harvard Square. Hope to see some of you there! thanks, andy -- -- Andy Carvin acarvin (at) edc . org andycarvin (at) yahoo . com http://www.digitaldivide.net http://www.andycarvin.com -- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week: URLs and such
Steph, Your server is not configured for opml files. The file is being sent as text/plain where it probably should be sent as text/xml or something like that. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:19:48 +0200, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steph, I went to fireAnt and did add new channel and put in the url http://www.mortaine.com/Video/VlogWeek.opml and got this error Error downloading and parsing channel feed (I'm using fireAnt for Mac) ... what did I do wrong? ... thanks for setting this up, by the way ... Richard On 4/4/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're working on the RSS/web page URL and should have something by the end of the day. I have a FireAnt-generated OPML file of all the valid feeds at http://www.mortaine.com//Video/VlogWeek.opml, so you can import them quickly (I hope) to your vlog viewing program of choice. These are the videoblogs for which I couldn't find valid feeds or any feed or they weren't responding: Anne Walk http://nopractice.blogspot.com --NO FEED? Magic Monkey Bobhttp://magicmonkeybob.blogspot.com/ --NO FEED? Susan http://kitykity.blogspot.com/ --NO FEED? Ted Tagami http://www.tagami.com --FEED (invalid) Trine http://davidandtrine.org -- NOT RESPONDING If you have a feed for your vlog and I missed it, just drop me a line so I can add it to the OPML file and, later the mega-feed. --Stephanie -- Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogs Yahoo! Groups Links -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Fourth Screen Festival
Hello vlogland! I am working on a project that needs your work! The idea is really, to help generate excitement and support for open tools and useful projects which expand how we can use our cell phones. AND There's monetary prizes and the winning works will be hosted online for a year. This is an independent festival, in other words, not funded by a major network looking for free content. Check it out: http://www.the4thscreen.net How does this relate to videobloggers? Well, we are the ones who are driving the open source and community potentials of independent video creation and distribution. Mobile phone video distribution should not be left to major media corporations to exploit. I look forward to seeing the amazing energy of this community continuing to push the boundaries of what is possible. Call for work http://www.the4thscreen.net/call_for_work4106.php Press Release http://www.thefourthscreen.net/press_release4106.php The site is also starting a blog where we can discuss the ideas and potentials for mobile media innovations. -- Mica Scalin What's cooking in The PAN?http://www.thepan.org --Hello? http://www.micawave.tv http://www.micascalin.net SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Danger Vlogging: Day 2
It seems to be getting worse. Technorati hasn't added any new vlogs to the tag in more than five hours now, and I know for a fact that lots of vlogs have been updated since then, including mine. Argh. ac --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah ... sad ... I'm missing, and I've tried tagging and pinging technoratti a zillion different ways :( richardshow.com On 4/4/06, Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at the technorati feed a few hours ago, I counted just over 50 different vloggers who'd contributed content since yesterday. Please pardon any spelling mistakes or missing names. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week/Dangerous: Day 3 and URLs
I added this channel to fireAnt and it didn't give me an error, but when I do browse channel, it doesn't show any episodes ... RichardOn 4/4/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, let's get the URLs out there:The VlogWeek feeds of feeds:New feed: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/rss.phpAdd your vlog to the feed: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/add.aspView HTML-based list: http://xicast.com/vlogweek2006/list.aspAidan Owens put those together-- we're still working on the enclosure parts. Danger Vlog Idea for Day 3: Do something that's a real physicalchallenge for you and vlog it.--Stephanie--Stephanie Bryant[EMAIL PROTECTED]Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogsYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Richard http://www.richardshow.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week: URLs and such
ok ... what does import the opml mean? or, more importantly, how do you do that?... RichardOn 4/5/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it is an opml file not an rss feed... you need to import the opml to get all the feeds there...but this seems a bit much just for a week of vlogs, would be better if there was one feed for all vlogweek videos On 4/5/06, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steph,I went to fireAnt and did add new channel and put in the urlhttp://www.mortaine.com/Video/VlogWeek.opml and got this error Error downloading and parsing channel feed(I'm using fireAnt for Mac)... what did I do wrong?... thanks for setting this up, by the way ... Richard On 4/4/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're working on the RSS/web page URL and should have something by theend of the day.I have a FireAnt-generated OPML file of all the valid feeds at http://www.mortaine.com//Video/VlogWeek.opml , so you can import themquickly (I hope) to your vlog viewing program of choice.These are the videoblogs for which I couldn't find valid feeds or anyfeed or they weren't responding:Anne Walk http://nopractice.blogspot.com --NO FEED?Magic Monkey Bob http://magicmonkeybob.blogspot.com/ --NO FEED?Susan http://kitykity.blogspot.com/ --NO FEED?Ted Tagami http://www.tagami.com --FEED (invalid)Trine http://davidandtrine.org -- NOT RESPONDINGIf you have a feed for your vlog and I missed it, just drop me a lineso I can add it to the OPML file and, later the mega-feed.--Stephanie--Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogsYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- Josh Leowww.JoshLeo.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
geez, casey! he's been posted those online again i told him it was bad for our image!On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Devlon-What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in theinterview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say?This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making thisstatement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I wouldimagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has aproblem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn'teven know I was there.Personally, I like your pink frilly pantiesthe best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;)Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch overthis interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol?If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Briefhappens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that shewould be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. TheRight Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact thatthey're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote:Hello, There's a bit more info there.But they're really avoidanswering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal.And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote:Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it...Adam Curry clears up concerns that under thePodshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content:http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.comYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Anne Walkhttp://loadedpun.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Danger Vlogging: Day 2
Has anyone tried to contact Technorati regarding the apparent problem? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to be getting worse. Technorati hasn't added any new vlogs to the tag in more than five hours now, and I know for a fact that lots of vlogs have been updated since then, including mine. Argh. ac --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Show richard@ wrote: yeah ... sad ... I'm missing, and I've tried tagging and pinging technoratti a zillion different ways :( richardshow.com On 4/4/06, Andy Carvin acarvin@ wrote: Looking at the technorati feed a few hours ago, I counted just over 50 different vloggers who'd contributed content since yesterday. Please pardon any spelling mistakes or missing names. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Hello,I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling that Adam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people. Let me explain.While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effect that they own the content. If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself.See yaOn 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Devlon-What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in theinterview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say?This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making thisstatement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I wouldimagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has aproblem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn'teven know I was there.Personally, I like your pink frilly pantiesthe best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;)Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch overthis interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol?If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Briefhappens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that shewould be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. TheRight Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact thatthey're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote:Hello, There's a bit more info there.But they're really avoidanswering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal.And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote:Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it...Adam Curry clears up concerns that under thePodshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content:http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 [...]-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:55:44 +0200, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. Making a statement like that means nothing. What matters is what the contract says, and he's not sharing their standard contract, so all we can do is guess (and guessing is not in Podshow's favour). I suspect what Charles says is true. That PodShow participants are not signing over ownership, but only irrevocable and perpetual broadcasting rights (and probably a handful of other vital rights). So Curry can sit down and say we don't own their content and be technically correct, he will be incorrect in the eyes of most people (when people say PodShow owns the content they equate ownership rights with the irrevocable, perpetual broadcasting rights). If this is the truth then Curry is not only behaving unethucally, he's also being a moron. But Curry won't disclose the actual wording of the contracts so we can't know the truth. Coincidentally that also makes him a moron. :o) -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
that's probably what ot comes down to, yes.do they at least give some sort of royalties if podshow profits from your content?i think audio 'talk show' type content can often become irrelevent after some time passes whereas video is *more likely* to maintain a higer value as time passes. how many people go back and listen to a podcast from a year ago? unless these independent shows include quality music, live performances etc or is not entertainment content, then people would generally have an interest in podcast archives but for those interested in a podshow network, its mostly about entertainment and usually in the form of radio talk shows. so, maybe it doesnt fucking matter who has the rights in actuality and only good for a debate on what is fair to content creators etc. again, video is different in my mind. its possible you have YOU as a visual and that is something you dont nec want to have put out there and remixed and put out of context without your consent (and any other person that is captured). there's my besides the point piece of babble. ;)sullOn 4/5/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling that Adam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people. Let me explain.While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effect that they own the content. If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself.See yaOn 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon-What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in theinterview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say?This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making thisstatement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I wouldimagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has aproblem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn'teven know I was there.Personally, I like your pink frilly pantiesthe best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;)Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch overthis interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol?If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Briefhappens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that shewould be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. TheRight Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact thatthey're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote:Hello, There's a bit more info there.But they're really avoidanswering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal.And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote:Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it...Adam Curry clears up concerns that under thePodshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 [...]-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Meh, It just seems dodgy still. If it's in the contract why deny it. But, whatever :) Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there. Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely.Actually Anne has been asking me to wear her pink frilly ones. I don't own any. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- ~Devlonhttp://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodnesshttp://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcastshttp://8bitme.blogspot.comhttp://devlonduthie.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
also, i think people interested in a podshow type of service are looking for exposure with the hope to land a bigger and better opportunity. well, that's the whole purpose, right? this likely holds more value than the content they will put out while in contract with podshow. its a price you pay for potential money and opportunity. cant have it all!sullOn 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:that's probably what ot comes down to, yes. do they at least give some sort of royalties if podshow profits from your content?i think audio 'talk show' type content can often become irrelevent after some time passes whereas video is *more likely* to maintain a higer value as time passes. how many people go back and listen to a podcast from a year ago? unless these independent shows include quality music, live performances etc or is not entertainment content, then people would generally have an interest in podcast archives but for those interested in a podshow network, its mostly about entertainment and usually in the form of radio talk shows. so, maybe it doesnt fucking matter who has the rights in actuality and only good for a debate on what is fair to content creators etc. again, video is different in my mind. its possible you have YOU as a visual and that is something you dont nec want to have put out there and remixed and put out of context without your consent (and any other person that is captured). there's my besides the point piece of babble. ;)sullOn 4/5/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling that Adam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people. Let me explain.While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effect that they own the content. If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself.See yaOn 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon-What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in theinterview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say?This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making thisstatement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I wouldimagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has aproblem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn'teven know I was there.Personally, I like your pink frilly pantiesthe best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;)Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch overthis interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol?If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Briefhappens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that shewould be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. TheRight Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact thatthey're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote:Hello, There's a bit more info there.But they're really avoidanswering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal.And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote:Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it...Adam Curry clears
[videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
I would like to see Keith and the Girl interview Adam Curry about this, but Curry would be an idiot if he did an interview with them. Although they are entertaining, they are also set in their beliefs and they may just gang up on him. In the end, an interview like that would be about as entertaining as CNN's Crossfire and wouldn't really do much to change public opinion on either side. When you're a businessman trying to promote a product, you choose to do interviews with people who will not give you a negative image. Perhaps this is what he was doing with Geek Brief. Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling that Adam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people. Let me explain. While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effect that they own the content. If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself. See ya On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible? Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there. Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon duthied@ wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
i've not really followed the story i listened to some of the podcast about it.so, is this (controversy?) about Adam Curry not admitting intracacies of the contract or is it about the contract itself? On 4/5/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Meh, It just seems dodgy still. If it's in the contract why deny it. But, whatever :) Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there. Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely.Actually Anne has been asking me to wear her pink frilly ones. I don't own any. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodnesshttp://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Flash Player Express Install Experience?
Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones wrote: The major problem I know of with Express Install is the admin permissions on networks. Yes, that's true... if someone does not have permission to change the machine they're using, then changing it becomes difficult. Is this the core of the conversation, right here...? I have no idea in the world how to implement the FlashObject code into my blogs or videos. Hmm, if the core of this conversation is instead How can I set up Express Install for auto-updating the Flash Player? then does this article help? Best Practices for Flash Player Detection http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/flash/articles/fp8_detection.html jd -- John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/ Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:26:39 +0200, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When you're a businessman trying to promote a product, you choose to do interviews with people who will not give you a negative image. Perhaps this is what he was doing with Geek Brief. Businessmen who behave like that usually have a product they know to be subpar. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week: URLs and such
I guess the thing is that, for grins, it would be cool if somehow I could just sit down and watch like all the videos in order each day ... (maybe this says more about me needing to get a life, than anything about opml downloading) ... lifeless Richard On 4/5/06, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok ... what does import the opml mean? or, more importantly, how do you do that?... Richard On 4/5/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it is an opml file not an rss feed... you need to import the opml to get all the feeds there...but this seems a bit much just for a week of vlogs, would be better if there was one feed for all vlogweek videos On 4/5/06, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steph,I went to fireAnt and did add new channel and put in the urlhttp://www.mortaine.com/Video/VlogWeek.opml and got this error Error downloading and parsing channel feed(I'm using fireAnt for Mac)... what did I do wrong?... thanks for setting this up, by the way ... Richard On 4/4/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're working on the RSS/web page URL and should have something by theend of the day.I have a FireAnt-generated OPML file of all the valid feeds at http://www.mortaine.com//Video/VlogWeek.opml , so you can import themquickly (I hope) to your vlog viewing program of choice.These are the videoblogs for which I couldn't find valid feeds or anyfeed or they weren't responding:Anne Walk http://nopractice.blogspot.com --NO FEED?Magic Monkey Bob http://magicmonkeybob.blogspot.com/ --NO FEED?Susan http://kitykity.blogspot.com/ --NO FEED?Ted Tagami http://www.tagami.com --FEED (invalid)Trine http://davidandtrine.org -- NOT RESPONDINGIf you have a feed for your vlog and I missed it, just drop me a lineso I can add it to the OPML file and, later the mega-feed.--Stephanie--Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at: http://www.mortaine.com/blogsYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- Josh Leowww.JoshLeo.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com -- Richard http://www.richardshow.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
I gotta say that all this discussion about Podshow and their alleged contract seems like a lot to do about nothing. First of all no one knows if what was read was actually a Podshow contract, and second of all it takes two to do a deal. If someone offers you a contract (or agreement) you are under no obligation to sign it. You can even take a contract, read it, point out what you find objectionable and offer an alternative to try to come to some understanding on those terms before you agree to sign. It's not that complicated, and it's done all the time by people doing all kinds of business. Contracts can be very fluid things right up until the time they're signed. And often the first draft of a contract looks very different than the final. Parties often put their strongest position out first with at least a few clauses that they will cede if necessary. Giving over exclusive rights to your work (for at least a limited time) is pretty standard for entertainment contracts, as are non-compete clauses etc. And it's up to the person signing the contract to make sure that what they will be getting in exchange for giving up these rights is worth it to them. And again if someone offers you a contract like this and you don't think it's favorable to you--DON'T SIGN IT! Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling that Adam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people. Let me explain. While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effect that they own the content. If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself. See ya On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible? Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there. Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon duthied@ wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote:
[videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Businessmen who behave like that usually have a product they know to be subpar. I disagree. Part of being in a cutting edge business is confidentiality. The last thing you want is your competition knowing all the details of your business. Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
damn that google, can't hide anything. On 4/5/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geez, casey! he's been posted those online again i told him it was bad for our image! On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible? Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there. Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com Yahoo! Groups Links http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Anne Walk http://loadedpun.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com
[videoblogging] Will vodcast/podcast Internet Entertainment Networks Work?
Since this is one of the more common emerging businesse plans in this space, I ask will it work? Will it try to mimic the template of TV and Radio and have success?I am speaking of Exclusive Networks of content creators, not marketplaces where anyone can sell content through... like iTunes, openomic, fireant(?) etc... I assume Apple and others are thinking about launching such a service instead of simply selling a la carte media.How do you think it will all play out?-- Sull http://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
I told you... I'm a ninja... Google had nothing to do with it... your panty footage is safe with me. For now... Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: damn that google, can't hide anything. On 4/5/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geez, casey! he's been posted those online again i told him it was bad for our image! On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible? Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there. Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon duthied@ wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com Yahoo! Groups Links http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- Anne Walk http://loadedpun.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group
[videoblogging] need your help saying the words Spot Jill Carroll!
Hi everyone, I've got a really odd favor to ask. I'm working on a vlog about my trip to Boston's Logan airport on Sunday to see the arrival of former Iraq hostage Jill Carroll. As some of you may have heard, Carroll evaded the media and whisked away in a limo, leaving the media to do nothing except scratch themselves, trying to interview clueless travelers who happened to be arriving at the same time. So, I've decided to make this little media circus into a gameshow called Spot Jill Carroll! I'm working on the intro right now, and I want to simulate an audience of people yelling out SPOT JILL CARROLL! in a way similar to the opening of Wheel of Fortune (ie, WHEELOFFORTUNE!). So here's where you come in. I'm hoping some of my fellow vloggers would record a snippet of audio of them saying the words SPOT...JILL... CARROLL! so I can mix them together like it's an audience saying it in unison. So if you have a few minutes, I'd really, really be grateful if you could record some audio of yourself saying these words and email them to me at acarvin at edc dot org. I'll need them in the next 24 hours so I can get this done by Thursday afternoon. I can take .wav, .aifc, .mp3, quicktime and .wmv format, though my preference is .wav. If I get enough of them, I'll use them in the vlog. If not, I guess I'll think of something else. Pushing the envelope of Voiceover 2.0, andy -- -- Andy Carvin acarvin (at) edc . org andycarvin (at) yahoo . com http://www.digitaldivide.net http://www.andycarvin.com -- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
from the reading on keith and the girl, however, a bigger and better opportunity would be difficult as, after the end of your contract with podshow, they retain rights to your brand in perpetuity - your name, your logo, your content during your contract and the content that you made coming into it. your website would be theirs. that was my interpretation. it's just like record labels who sign people up when they are new and then own the rights to their music forever after. podcasting was supposed to be a way to get away from record labels. wasn't that what curry was spouting when he started the thing? of course, many people will be fine with those terms because they are hoping that fame and fortune will offset the negatives and it might. that's an individual choice (one that i wouldn't make but that's me) either way, full disclosure is called for.anneOn 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also, i think people interested in a podshow type of service are looking for exposure with the hope to land a bigger and better opportunity. well, that's the whole purpose, right? this likely holds more value than the content they will put out while in contract with podshow. its a price you pay for potential money and opportunity. cant have it all!sull On 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:that's probably what ot comes down to, yes. do they at least give some sort of royalties if podshow profits from your content?i think audio 'talk show' type content can often become irrelevent after some time passes whereas video is *more likely* to maintain a higer value as time passes. how many people go back and listen to a podcast from a year ago? unless these independent shows include quality music, live performances etc or is not entertainment content, then people would generally have an interest in podcast archives but for those interested in a podshow network, its mostly about entertainment and usually in the form of radio talk shows. so, maybe it doesnt fucking matter who has the rights in actuality and only good for a debate on what is fair to content creators etc. again, video is different in my mind. its possible you have YOU as a visual and that is something you dont nec want to have put out there and remixed and put out of context without your consent (and any other person that is captured). there's my besides the point piece of babble. ;)sullOn 4/5/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling that Adam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people. Let me explain.While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effect that they own the content. If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself.See yaOn 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon-What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in theinterview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say?This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making thisstatement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I wouldimagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has aproblem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn'teven know I was there.Personally, I like your pink frilly pantiesthe best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;)Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch overthis interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol?If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Briefhappens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that shewould be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seriously, what this vlog community needs is a new Monty Python... with men dressed as women and rowdy british comedy. Devlon in panties is a good start. :PI don't see that happening in the near future. Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geez, casey! he's been posted those online again i told him it was bad for our image! On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible? Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there. Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon duthied@ wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Anne Walk http://loadedpun.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Michael Sullivan wrote: i think audio 'talk show' type content can often become irrelevent after some time passes whereas video is *more likely* to maintain a higer value as time passes. how many people go back and listen to a podcast from a year ago? unless these independent shows include quality music, live performances etc or is not entertainment content, then people would generally have an interest in podcast archives but for those interested in a podshow network, its mostly about entertainment and usually in the form of radio talk shows. I know that it is fairly common for a new listener to the Dawn and Drew Show to go back through their archives and listen to plenty of old material, often the entire catalog. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
i can understand the brand and content, but hopefully they let people have another show on their own after a contract is over (and i believe the contracts are short-term). they prob own rights of the name of your podcast, logos etc... but your private name and ability to start a new show should be your right and i'd guess that it is in this case to. On 4/5/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: from the reading on keith and the girl, however, a bigger and better opportunity would be difficult as, after the end of your contract with podshow, they retain rights to your brand in perpetuity - your name, your logo, your content during your contract and the content that you made coming into it. your website would be theirs. that was my interpretation. it's just like record labels who sign people up when they are new and then own the rights to their music forever after. podcasting was supposed to be a way to get away from record labels. wasn't that what curry was spouting when he started the thing? of course, many people will be fine with those terms because they are hoping that fame and fortune will offset the negatives and it might. that's an individual choice (one that i wouldn't make but that's me) either way, full disclosure is called for.anneOn 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also, i think people interested in a podshow type of service are looking for exposure with the hope to land a bigger and better opportunity. well, that's the whole purpose, right? this likely holds more value than the content they will put out while in contract with podshow. its a price you pay for potential money and opportunity. cant have it all!sull On 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:that's probably what ot comes down to, yes. do they at least give some sort of royalties if podshow profits from your content?i think audio 'talk show' type content can often become irrelevent after some time passes whereas video is *more likely* to maintain a higer value as time passes. how many people go back and listen to a podcast from a year ago? unless these independent shows include quality music, live performances etc or is not entertainment content, then people would generally have an interest in podcast archives but for those interested in a podshow network, its mostly about entertainment and usually in the form of radio talk shows. so, maybe it doesnt fucking matter who has the rights in actuality and only good for a debate on what is fair to content creators etc. again, video is different in my mind. its possible you have YOU as a visual and that is something you dont nec want to have put out there and remixed and put out of context without your consent (and any other person that is captured). there's my besides the point piece of babble. ;)sullOn 4/5/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling that Adam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people. Let me explain.While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effect that they own the content. If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself.See yaOn 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon-What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in theinterview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say?This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making thisstatement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I wouldimagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has aproblem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn'teven know I was there.Personally, I like your pink frilly pantiesthe best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;)Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch overthis interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol?If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week: URLs and such
Andreas Haugstrup wrote: Steph, Your server is not configured for opml files. The file is being sent as text/plain where it probably should be sent as text/xml or something like that. I use text/xml for the mime-type. Also, the feed may or may not be valid, depending on who you ask... URL:http://validator.opml.org/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mortaine.com%2FVideo%2FVlogWeek.opml URL:http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/rsv.aspx?xml=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mortaine.com%2FVideo%2FVlogWeek.opmlSubmit1=Validate%21 Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: HDD for Video Blogging?
I've been producing an online series using Sony's HDV cameras and while it drives us crazy in editing (go for a long lunch renders) it has several advantages. There is more information for the compressor to work with which appears to make a difference. I had to cut some DV 16:9 footage into a program and even after compression you could tell a difference. T --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, legrandmagistery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're thinking about starting a vlog. I read on Gizmodo the other day about Sony coming out with an HDD Handycam (the DCR-SR100). After reading about that, I also discovered the JVC already has a couple on the market (the Everio G Series). Do any of you currently use an HDD camcorder? What are the advantages? The cameras seem a little more expensive, but we wouldn't need to invest in any tapes, discs, or any other media, so it seems pretty appealing and ideal for doing a vlog. What do you think? Any and all help/opinions would be greatly appreciated as I'd love to get this thing going asap. Many thanks in advance! P.S. If not an HDD camera, what other kinds of cameras do current vloggers use that are reccomended? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Technorati OPML ??
Michael Sullivan wrote: Ok, I use technorati but not until today did i go looking for an OPML so I could export videobloggingweek2006 tag. Can it be that they do not support OPML? This is insane! Which part is insane? The fact that Technorati might not support a standard like OPML? (hurm... I use the term standard quite loosely.) Do they have an xoxo list instead? Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Will vodcast/podcast Internet Entertainment Networks Work?
I think this is a tricky question and a bit confusing. I don't think we will see internet only dramas that are producing weekly episodes with budgets in the tens of millions anytime soon. This is one element of the TV template. I think that internet entertainment networks will work. (Obviously or I wouldn't work where I do.) But, it reminds me of a quote from Dave Chappelle's interview on Inside the Actors Studio. His father, a professor, asked him if he thought he could make it as a comedian. He responded that if he could make as much money as a teacher and be a comedian, then he would consider that making it. But back to the template element. I don't think it is out of the question, but I don't think it is mandatory either. I think the cornerstone of digital entertainment is the freedom to use any format, even a traditional one. I think it is like asking if television will be able to succed with vaudeville programs at its inception. It did, but it succeeded with other programs as well. Vaudeville, both over television and in person slowly morphed into unrecognizable forms such that the vaudeville format is considered passe, but the Chappelle show is fresh and innovative. Jim V DivX --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since this is one of the more common emerging businesse plans in this space, I ask will it work? Will it try to mimic the template of TV and Radio and have success? I am speaking of Exclusive Networks of content creators, not marketplaces where anyone can sell content through... like iTunes, openomic, fireant(?) etc... I assume Apple and others are thinking about launching such a service instead of simply selling a la carte media. How do you think it will all play out? -- Sull http://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Hello,Correct me if I'm wrong but, accounding to what Keith and the Girl said, if you signed up with PodShow then you were forever prevented from making a PodCast/Vlog/etc with anyone else or on your own. ( I.e., all your work now and in the future had to go through them.)Which IMO is a pretty bad deal for the podcaster/vlogger.See yaOn 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also, i think people interested in a podshow type of service are looking for exposure with the hope to land a bigger and better opportunity. well, that's the whole purpose, right? this likely holds more value than the content they will put out while in contract with podshow. its a price you pay for potential money and opportunity. cant have it all!sull On 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:that's probably what ot comes down to, yes. do they at least give some sort of royalties if podshow profits from your content?i think audio 'talk show' type content can often become irrelevent after some time passes whereas video is *more likely* to maintain a higer value as time passes. how many people go back and listen to a podcast from a year ago? unless these independent shows include quality music, live performances etc or is not entertainment content, then people would generally have an interest in podcast archives but for those interested in a podshow network, its mostly about entertainment and usually in the form of radio talk shows. so, maybe it doesnt fucking matter who has the rights in actuality and only good for a debate on what is fair to content creators etc. again, video is different in my mind. its possible you have YOU as a visual and that is something you dont nec want to have put out there and remixed and put out of context without your consent (and any other person that is captured). there's my besides the point piece of babble. ;)sullOn 4/5/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling that Adam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people. Let me explain.While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effect that they own the content. If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself.See yaOn 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon-What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in theinterview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say?This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making thisstatement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I wouldimagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has aproblem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn'teven know I was there.Personally, I like your pink frilly pantiesthe best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;)Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch overthis interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol?If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Briefhappens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that shewould be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. TheRight Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact thatthey're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote:Hello, There's a bit more info there.But they're really avoidanswering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Hello,True, it wouild be entertaining :-)I'd like see the contracts that Keith and the Girl had sent to them. That would certainly clear things up one way or another.See ya On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to see Keith and the Girl interview Adam Curry aboutthis, but Curry would be an idiot if he did an interview with them.Although they are entertaining, they are also set in their beliefs andthey may just gang up on him.In the end, an interview like that would be about as entertaining as CNN's Crossfire and wouldn't reallydo much to change public opinion on either side.When you're a businessman trying to promote a product, you choose todo interviews with people who will not give you a negative image. Perhaps this is what he was doing with Geek Brief.Caseyhttp://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Charles Iliya Krempeaux[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'd need to actually read the contract, but I have a feeling thatAdam Curry is using a bit of word play to mislead people.Let me explain. While technically, they don't own the content, it has the effectthat they own the content.If PodShow gets exclusive rights to do anything they want with your content forever, and you cannot use your content any more in any way, then, for all intents and purposes, they own your content. Although technically speaking, they don't own it... they just have a certain kind of contract which gives them all the legal rights that they would have if they owned it... and that same contact stripped you of virtuall all the legal rights you had as owner. But, like I said, I'd need to actually read it for myself. See ya On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say?This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible? Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there.Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon duthied@ wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you wouldask if you were interviewing your idol?If I was interviewing someone Ilook up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The RightThing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they'rehiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote:Hello, There's a bit more info there.But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal.And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69[...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Individual
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week: URLs and such
On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:56:25 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Haugstrup wrote: Steph, Your server is not configured for opml files. The file is being sent as text/plain where it probably should be sent as text/xml or something like that. I use text/xml for the mime-type. No, the file is being sent as text/plain. Do a HEAD at see for yourself: URL: http://mbn.dk/q/?method=HEADurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mortaine.com%2FVideo%2FVlogWeek.opmlxtra=vars= -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:33:41 +0200, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Businessmen who behave like that usually have a product they know to be subpar. I disagree. Part of being in a cutting edge business is confidentiality. The last thing you want is your competition knowing all the details of your business. That's not what you said. You said: When you're a businessman trying to promote a product, you choose to do interviews with people who will not give you a negative image. Perhaps this is what he was doing with Geek Brief. That's not about confidentiality. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Hello,Originally (at least from my perspective), after listening to this...http://shitecom.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=73950 ...this was about the contract being bad. The PodShow and Adam Curry were OK. But they did nothing wrong. It's just that it was my/our opinion that the contract was bad. But you didn't have to sign it, so things were OK. But after hearing this...http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69...I/we then starting having a problem with Adam Curry. And starting question his character. And that's what this discussion has now evolved into.See yaOn 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've not really followed the story i listened to some of the podcast about it.so, is this (controversy?) about Adam Curry not admitting intracacies of the contract or is it about the contract itself? On 4/5/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon- What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content. What he said in the interview was content isn't owned by us it's owned by the producers. That said... what else does he need to say? This was the biggest concern addressed by Keith and the Girl... and by making this statement on GeekBrief.tv, he has made a public statement that I would imagine can hold him accountable in a court of law if someone has a problem. What else do you want him to do... swear on the bible?Meh, It just seems dodgy still. If it's in the contract why deny it. But, whatever :) Devlon, I'm a fracking ninja... if I'm in your bedroom, you wouldn't even know I was there. Personally, I like your pink frilly panties the best... they frame your butt very nicely.Actually Anne has been asking me to wear her pink frilly ones. I don't own any. ;) Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have steered away from the question all together not opened with it 'so we can clear all the doubts once and for all...' And how'd you know I wore panties today? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Relax guys, there's no reason to get your panties in a bunch over this interview... what sort of questions do you think you would ask if you were interviewing your idol? If I was interviewing someone I look up to... like Kyle McLaughlin or Bill Shatner... I doubt I would ask too many controversial questions. There are two sides to every story and Cali from Geek Brief happens to like Podshow and Adam Curry... so why is it so wrong that she would be happy to promote the system and its' founder? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Which is total BS. It's a classic Old Corporation approach. The Right Thing to do is just make their standard public. The fact that they're hiding it makes me pretty sure it's pretty bad. - Andreas On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:19:23 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, There's a bit more info there. But they're really avoid answering questions there too. See ya On 4/5/06, john coffey jimmycrackhead2000@ wrote: What a load of crap! Geekbrief is totally swingin on Adams you know what! For a more objective talk check out Podcast 411 http://media24a.libsyn.com/podcasts/podcast411/411_060308.mp3 http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Devlon duthied@ wrote: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 She's a podshow 'gal. And it showswhere's the hard questions? On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon mskitka@ wrote: Thought this was interesting and that others might enjoy it... Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow contract he owns all Podshow producers' content: http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ [...]-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Andreas- I'm not contradicting myself, I'm discussing two seperate points: 1- Business confidentiality to protect a company's individuality (i.e. not divulging specific information so that your company remains on the cutting edge of it's domain); 2- Interview strategies to promote a positive image (i.e. only doing interviews with people who you know and trust... do you think President Bush would ever do an interview with Michael Moore? I don't think so). I hope I have clarified myself enough to you... I grow tired of this conversation. Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:33:41 +0200, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup solitude@ wrote: Businessmen who behave like that usually have a product they know to be subpar. I disagree. Part of being in a cutting edge business is confidentiality. The last thing you want is your competition knowing all the details of your business. That's not what you said. You said: When you're a businessman trying to promote a product, you choose to do interviews with people who will not give you a negative image. Perhaps this is what he was doing with Geek Brief. That's not about confidentiality. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Technorati OPML ??
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do they have an xoxo list instead? A xoxo list would be a fair bet. It was developed by one of the technorati boys (Tantek). Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: HDD for Video Blogging?
Please note that HDD and HDV are not the same. The original question is about HDD cameras - Hard Disk Drive, i.e. tapeless cameras. Sony just announced a new $1000 HDD camera which competes with JVC's Everio line. This is quite handy because you just copy files instead of capturing from tape. These cameras is *not* high definition, however. HDV refers to High Definition Video on miniDV tapes. I also have one of Sony's HDV cameras, the HC1. Most of the time I record in high def but downconvert to DV to make editing go faster. chuck mnstories.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, toekneearm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been producing an online series using Sony's HDV cameras and while it drives us crazy in editing (go for a long lunch renders) it has several advantages. There is more information for the compressor to work with which appears to make a difference. I had to cut some DV 16:9 footage into a program and even after compression you could tell a difference. T --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, legrandmagistery magistery@ wrote: We're thinking about starting a vlog. I read on Gizmodo the other day about Sony coming out with an HDD Handycam (the DCR-SR100). After reading about that, I also discovered the JVC already has a couple on the market (the Everio G Series). Do any of you currently use an HDD camcorder? What are the advantages? The cameras seem a little more expensive, but we wouldn't need to invest in any tapes, discs, or any other media, so it seems pretty appealing and ideal for doing a vlog. What do you think? Any and all help/opinions would be greatly appreciated as I'd love to get this thing going asap. Many thanks in advance! P.S. If not an HDD camera, what other kinds of cameras do current vloggers use that are reccomended? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Will vodcast/podcast Internet Entertainment Networks Work?
Hello,On 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since this is one of the more common emerging businesse plans in this space, I ask will it work? Will it try to mimic the template of TV and Radio and have success?I am speaking of Exclusive Networks of content creators, not marketplaces where anyone can sell content through... like iTunes, openomic, fireant(?) etc... I assume Apple and others are thinking about launching such a service instead of simply selling a la carte media.How do you think it will all play out?I do think that this will become a big money maker. (Which is probably good news to people wanting to make a living off of this.) But it's going to take some time, some technological change, and some social change. For example, we probably need to get it so people can watch vlogs on their big screen TV. Also, we probably will need to be able to put commercials into our shows. (And not hardcoded ones that we are seeing today, but ones as changing as the banner ads you see on webpages. I.e., you don't see the same banner ad over and over again, year after year.) But I'm only scratching the surface of this in this e-mail. (This would probably turn into an essay or a book if I really wanted to do this topic justice.) See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Week: URLs and such
Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 8:56:25 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote: Andreas Haugstrup wrote: Steph, Your server is not configured for opml files. The file is being sent as text/plain where it probably should be sent as text/xml or something like that. I use text/xml for the mime-type. Also, the feed may or may not be valid, depending on who you ask... URL:http://validator.opml.org/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mortaine.com%2FVideo%2FVlogWeek.opml URL:http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/rsv.aspx?xml=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mortaine.com%2FVideo%2FVlogWeek.opmlSubmit1=Validate%21 Hmm. The top one says it's invalid OPML, and the bottom one says it's valid XML. No disagreement there. From a practical point of view I was unable to get it to load into Juice (a.k.a iPodder), which I believe is still the most popular open enclosure fetcher. It just reported 0 feeds imported. Can anyone who has managed to import it export a more compliant one? -- Frank Carver http://www.makevideo.org.uk Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:21:31 +0200, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas- I'm not contradicting myself, I'm discussing two seperate points: 1- Business confidentiality to protect a company's individuality (i.e. not divulging specific information so that your company remains on the cutting edge of it's domain); You added this point in your reply to me. Since you hadn't brought it up in your first e-mail I obviously wasn't replying to it. I don't have a time machine. 2- Interview strategies to promote a positive image (i.e. only doing interviews with people who you know and trust... do you think President Bush would ever do an interview with Michael Moore? I don't think so). And I'm telling you that businessmen who pursue this trategy usually have a product they know is subpar. After all if the product was fine they would be able to defend it. President Bush is a special case. He probably wouldn't do an interview with Michael Moore because he is following a strategy of only speaking to his yes-men. And his credibility has suffered greatly as a result. You always see companies/people marked as the bad guy show up for interviews where they know they'll be attacked. It is better than the alternative (staying quiet and let the media angle the story after their liking, or only speaking to yes-men and be called on it). Only speaking to those who already favour you haven't been a viable strategy since the 50s. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will vodcast/podcast Internet Entertainment Networks Work?
Hello,I haven't admitted it on this list, but I'm filming Internet only TV shows. (At least one should be released by the end of this year.) So I think it's coming sooner than you might think.Sure, I don't expect to pull a profit right away. And I'm not by any means spending millions of dollars. But Internet TV shows are on their way. (And I doubt I'm the only one doing this.) See yaOn 4/5/06, JV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this is a tricky question and a bit confusing.I don't think we will see internet only dramas that are producingweekly episodes with budgets in the tens of millions anytime soon.This is one element of the TV template. I think that internet entertainment networks will work. (Obviously orI wouldn't work where I do.) But, it reminds me of a quote from DaveChappelle's interview on Inside the Actors Studio.His father, a professor, asked him if he thought he could make it as a comedian. He responded that if he could make as much money as ateacher and be a comedian, then he would consider that making it.But back to the template element. I don't think it is out of thequestion, but I don't think it is mandatory either. I think the cornerstone of digital entertainment is the freedom to use any format,even a traditional one. I think it is like asking if television willbe able to succed with vaudeville programs at its inception. It did, but it succeeded with other programs as well. Vaudeville, both overtelevision and in person slowly morphed into unrecognizable forms suchthat the vaudeville format is considered passe, but the Chappelle showis fresh and innovative. Jim VDivX--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since this is one of the more common emerging businesse plans in this space, I ask will it work? Will it try to mimic the template of TV and Radio and have success? I am speaking of Exclusive Networks of content creators, notmarketplaces where anyone can sell content through... like iTunes, openomic,fireant(?) etc... I assume Apple and others are thinking about launching such a service instead of simply selling a la carte media. How do you think it will all play out?[...]-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
After all if the product was fine theywould be able to defend it.in private meetings, sure. on an entertainment venue, not always true.you can proeprly defend but if an insult or other negative trajectory by the 'host' is more entertaining, then guess who wins? On 4/5/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:21:31 +0200, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Andreas- I'm not contradicting myself, I'm discussing two seperate points: 1- Business confidentiality to protect a company's individuality (i.e. not divulging specific information so that your company remains on the cutting edge of it's domain);You added this point in your reply to me. Since you hadn't brought it up in your first e-mail I obviously wasn't replying to it. I don't have atime machine. 2- Interview strategies to promote a positive image (i.e. only doing interviews with people who you know and trust... do you think President Bush would ever do an interview with Michael Moore?I don't think so).And I'm telling you that businessmen who pursue this trategy usually havea product they know is subpar. After all if the product was fine they would be able to defend it.President Bush is a special case. He probably wouldn't do an interviewwith Michael Moore because he is following a strategy of only speaking tohis yes-men. And his credibility has suffered greatly as a result. You always see companies/people marked as the bad guy show up for interviewswhere they know they'll be attacked. It is better than the alternative(staying quiet and let the media angle the story after their liking, or only speaking to yes-men and be called on it). Only speaking to those whoalready favour you haven't been a viable strategy since the 50s.--Andreas Haugstrup PedersenURL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Sull http://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:47:43 +0200, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After all if the product was fine they would be able to defend it. in private meetings, sure. on an entertainment venue, not always true. you can proeprly defend but if an insult or other negative trajectory by the 'host' is more entertaining, then guess who wins? That's the game. You still win more by showing up and getting slammed with unfounded accusations than you gain from staying away. That is why these tabloid journalists still have jobs as sad as that may be. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Hello,On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And I'm telling you that businessmen who pursue this trategy usually have a product they know is subpar. After all if the product was fine they would be able to defend it.If you programmed software that would make you a billionaire, wouldyou give away the code so that everyone can benefit on your unique idea?I don't think so.Actually alot of people do it. (Myself included.) It's call Free and Open Source software. Some examples include:LinuxApacheBind FirefoxThe GIMPCinepaintPHPBlender SynfigGNOMEAsteriskOpenOfficeVideoLAN WordpressThis is an extremely incomplete list since there are MILLIONS of Free and Open Source software packages out there. (You may very well be using Free and Open Source software and not even realize it.) The Internet would NOT exist if it weren't for Free and Open Source software. See http://fsf.org/ for more info (although it's probably more geared towards programmers, software engineers, and computer scientists).(And just to say it explicitly, you can make alot of money even if you make Free and Open Source software.) See ya[...]-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
Hello,Good point.On 4/5/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After all if the product was fine theywould be able to defend it. in private meetings, sure. on an entertainment venue, not always true.you can proeprly defend but if an insult or other negative trajectory by the 'host' is more entertaining, then guess who wins? On 4/5/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:21:31 +0200, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Andreas- I'm not contradicting myself, I'm discussing two seperate points: 1- Business confidentiality to protect a company's individuality (i.e. not divulging specific information so that your company remains on the cutting edge of it's domain);You added this point in your reply to me. Since you hadn't brought it up in your first e-mail I obviously wasn't replying to it. I don't have atime machine. 2- Interview strategies to promote a positive image (i.e. only doing interviews with people who you know and trust... do you think President Bush would ever do an interview with Michael Moore?I don't think so).And I'm telling you that businessmen who pursue this trategy usually havea product they know is subpar. After all if the product was fine they would be able to defend it.President Bush is a special case. He probably wouldn't do an interviewwith Michael Moore because he is following a strategy of only speaking tohis yes-men. And his credibility has suffered greatly as a result. You always see companies/people marked as the bad guy show up for interviewswhere they know they'll be attacked. It is better than the alternative(staying quiet and let the media angle the story after their liking, or only speaking to yes-men and be called on it). Only speaking to those whoalready favour you haven't been a viable strategy since the 50s.[...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Danger Vlogging: Day 2
It looks like the videoblogging2006 tag is the most popular tag being used in the entire blogosphere right now: http://technorati.com/tags/ On Apr 5, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Casey McKinnon wrote: Has anyone tried to contact Technorati regarding the apparent problem? Casey http://www.kitkast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to be getting worse. Technorati hasn't added any new vlogs to the tag in more than five hours now, and I know for a fact that lots of vlogs have been updated since then, including mine. Argh. ac --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Show richard@ wrote: yeah ... sad ... I'm missing, and I've tried tagging and pinging technoratti a zillion different ways :( richardshow.com On 4/4/06, Andy Carvin acarvin@ wrote: Looking at the technorati feed a few hours ago, I counted just over 50 different vloggers who'd contributed content since yesterday. Please pardon any spelling mistakes or missing names. Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Adam Curry on GeekBrief.tv
For whoever hasn't become bored with the debate, I posted a comment on the GeekBrief.tv post about the interview asking for some clarification. She did reply. http://geekbrief.podshow.com/?p=69 It all boils down to reading what you are signing. If all this debate has done is made people more aware, then that's cool. If Podshow wants to make a contract like they do (or don't) then so be it. My initial point was this bush-style interview was a farce as far as addressing the topic. ...my two cents. On 4/5/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And I'm telling you that businessmen who pursue this trategy usually have a product they know is subpar. After all if the product was fine they would be able to defend it. If you programmed software that would make you a billionaire, would you give away the code so that everyone can benefit on your unique idea? I don't think so. Actually alot of people do it. (Myself included.) It's call Free and Open Source software. Some examples include: Linux Apache Bind Firefox The GIMP Cinepaint PHP Blender Synfig GNOME Asterisk OpenOffice VideoLAN WordpressThis is an extremely incomplete list since there are MILLIONS of Free and Open Source software packages out there. (You may very well be using Free and Open Source software and not even realize it.) The Internet would NOT exist if it weren't for Free and Open Source software. See http://fsf.org/ for more info (although it's probably more geared towards programmers, software engineers, and computer scientists). (And just to say it explicitly, you can make alot of money even if you make Free and Open Source software.) See ya [...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- ~Devlon http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts http://8bitme.blogspot.com http://devlonduthie.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Technorati OPML ??
well, they support opml for the import or 'reading lists' but they dont seem to allow export. so as far as the favorites feature, they should at least offer opml export there. but i want more, i want to export a tag, even if i am only allowed to export the latest 50 or whatever from the tag. i'd like to see the option and since technorati is built around links, they could be more open by providing more ways to take links out without voodoo. On 4/5/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Sullivan wrote: Ok, I use technorati but not until today did i go looking for an OPML so I could export videobloggingweek2006 tag. Can it be that they do not support OPML?This is insane! Which part is insane? The fact that Technorati might not support astandard like OPML? (hurm... I use the term standard quite loosely.)Do they have an xoxo list instead?Pete --http://tinkernet.org/videoblog for the future...Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Sull http://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] VideoBlogging Week 2006...better late than never...
Stephanie Bryant wrote: I meant the link on your vlog page. When I add to the OPML, I go to the vlog web page and find the link there. Ah. Right. Fixed now. Thanks for letting me know! -- Rhett. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
