: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Anyone know anything about the Mikrotik
t;
>> From: "Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com>
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 7:31:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
>>
>> True, until you realize you can only put 8 or 16 customers on an AP. Their
>&g
;
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, September 11, 2017 7:31:25 PM
> *Subj
ay, September 11, 2017 7:31:25 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
True, until you realize you can only put 8 or 16 customers on an AP. Their
pricing isn’t terrible, and I’m going to be buying at least some Ignitenet for
this project. I was just hoping for some less expensive stuff I can us
for over $10k and IgniteNet is 1/10th
>>> of that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>
>>> The Brothers WISP
&
-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 3:56 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
I’m not sure why that is funny. The average CPE cost is much less than the
Ignitenet radios. I’m not running fiber, which is also cost
e.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------
> *From: *"Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, September 11, 2017 5:55:42 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
>
> I’m not sure why that
witter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Brett A Mansfield" <
rs WISP
>
>
>
>
> From: "Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:55:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
>
> I’m not sure why that is funny. The average CPE cost is much less than the
> Ignitenet radios. I
-
From: "Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:55:42 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
I’m not sure why that is funny. The average CPE cost is much less than the
Ignitenet radios. I’m not running fiber, which is also
om
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:24:23 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Anyone know anything about the Mikrotik 60GHz stuff yet? I’m looking for some
good gear and I use some Ignitenet. Ignitenet is great but so cost prohibitive.
I’m hoping Mikrotik will have theirs released very soon as I need a
gt; wrote:
>
> Ignitenet is cost prohibitive? LOL
>
> Chris Wright
> Network Administrator
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 3:24 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: [AF
Ignitenet is cost prohibitive? LOL
Chris Wright
Network Administrator
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 3:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Anyone know anything about the Mikrotik 60GHz
Anyone know anything about the Mikrotik 60GHz stuff yet? I’m looking for some
good gear and I use some Ignitenet. Ignitenet is great but so cost prohibitive.
I’m hoping Mikrotik will have theirs released very soon as I need a couple
hundred radios.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
is that in a lot of cities, half the folks
>>>>> don't have broadband at home. Wi-Fi service could be the economical
>>>>> solution. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> 60GHz is for achieving gigabit levels of service.
>>>>>
>>>&g
;>
>>>> 60GHz is for achieving gigabit levels of service.
>>>>
>>>> Hal
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is this angie
ving gigabit levels of service.
>>>
>>> Hal
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is this angie thing… can’t wrap my head around it yet
>>>>
>>>
on behalf of Harold Bledsoe <
>>> hbledso...@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM
>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [AFM
<g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is this angie thing… can’t wrap my head around it yet
>>>>
>>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Harold Bledsoe <
>>>> hbledso...@gmail.com>
>>>> R
wrote:
>>
>>> What is this angie thing… can’t wrap my head around it yet
>>>
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Harold Bledsoe <
>>> hbledso...@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> D
t is this angie thing… can’t wrap my head around it yet
>>>
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Harold Bledsoe <
>>> hbledso...@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, May 9,
’t wrap my head around it yet
>>
>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Harold Bledsoe <
>> hbledso...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM
>> To: "af@afmug.com&
com> wrote:
> That is for certain, gotta use exotic substrates. Not sure even teflon is
> good at that freq.
>
> *From:* Harold Bledsoe
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 09, 2017 1:37 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
> Yep
That is for certain, gotta use exotic substrates. Not sure even teflon is good
at that freq.
From: Harold Bledsoe
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 1:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
Yep and also the materials matter a lot. No FR4
om: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Harold Bledsoe <
> hbledso...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM
> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Does
17 7:39 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
> I have read that building a 60ghz antenna is a whole new ball game of
> complicated compared to other bands. Until recently 60ghz antennas where
> built SOC style, directly on the PCB
mug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
Hey Sterling,
No worries, we will have 15 CPE per s
mug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
Hey Sterling,
No worries, we will have 15 CPE per s
All antenna designs scale. Things are just much smaller at this frequency.
From: Joe Novak
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 7:39 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
I have read that building a 60ghz antenna is a whole new ball game of
complicated
>
Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone
Have It?
Lots.
Lots of places.
I’ve got, and can get fiber up main roads in
neighborhoods very easily.
What costs me is
un...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 2:21 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
>
> The top reasons that come to mind right away are:
>
> (1) Range. How close can you tolerate? It's not going to go ve
gt;> probably cover a hundred houses with that from the tower next to where I'm
>>> sitting.
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I concur
>>>>
>>>
t;>
>>>> Indeed... don't underestimate what can be done with a 2000' range. I
>>>> can probably cover a hundred houses with that from the tower next to where
>>>> I'm sitting.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villa
rom: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>> on behalf of
>>>> Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sterl...@avative.net');>>
>>>> Reply-To: "af
af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson <
>>> sterl...@avative.net>
>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Subject
gt;>>> I'm sitting.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I concur
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Af &l
te:
>>
>>> I concur
>>>
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson <
>>> sterl...@avative.net>
>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 P
t to where I'm
>> sitting.
>>
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I concur
>>>
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson <
>>> sterl...@avativ
>>> sitting.
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> I concur
>>>>
>>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson
>>>&
>
>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson <
>> sterl...@avative.net>
>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>
Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net
<mailto:sterl...@avative.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug
mug.com> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson <
> sterl...@avative.net>
> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It
te: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
Lots.
Lots of places.
I’ve got, and can get fiber up main roads in neighborhoods very easily.
Wh
.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 2:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
How many places do you want to install a PtMP system that goes a maximum of
1000-2000ft distance, that fiber does
1000 to 2000 ft distance is really optimistic for PtMP in 60 GHz even...
With FCC EIRP limits for 60 GHz PTP the longest it's good for around here
is 600 meters. A little bit more out to 800-900m with the weird Bridgewave
60 GHz product that combines regular maximum Tx power but uses a 60 cm dish
Prince
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 2:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
The top reasons that come to mind right away are:
(1) Range. How close can you tolerate? It's not going to go very far in a PMP
environment. Maybe a few hundred yards
How many places do you want to install a PtMP system that goes a maximum of
1000-2000ft distance, that fiber does not work?
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Sterling Jacobson
wrote:
> What am I missing here?
>
> Can't Cambium and UBNT and others simply overlay the same
favorite deity or demigod here) to depart or I will set ye on FIRE!" And
then hit them with the signal.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 2:20 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
The top reasons that com
The top reasons that come to mind right away are:
(1) Range. How close can you tolerate? It's not going to go very far in
a PMP environment. Maybe a few hundred yards. If there are trees, forget
about it.
(2) Modulation. Don't expect something in that frequency to be doing
higher level
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
But all of that is in the second half of the radio. From the ethernet port to
the modulation demodulation systems it should be the same as other radios. And
if they use robust modultion, you could just transvert an old
guessing ROI bashfulness. Who wants to invest in this band until we have
real world users evangelizing for the band. I am a skeptic. But I have been
proven wrong many times before.
From: Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 2:09 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't
The atmospheric characteristics of 60 GHz are radically different. Antenna
design is very different due to frequency for anything resembling a
"sector". Unless you want PtMP that's only good within 250 meters... More
challenging than you might think.
A lot of the work that has been done over the
Has any of these been deployed, in an area with real seasons for a full year
yet?
-Original Message-
From: Sterling Jacobson
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 2:05 PM
To: 'af@afmug.com'
Subject: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
What am I missing here?
Can't Cambium
What am I missing here?
Can't Cambium and UBNT and others simply overlay the same radio
architecture/software they have developed over a decade, on top of a 60GHz
radio instead of 5Ghz?
Is there some fundamental problem with using the same PHY later protocols on
60GHz vs 5GHz?
Im trying to avoid expensive licensed links. My customer base is too small for
now. If I have to spend money on licensed links for such a small area it
wouldn't be much more to just run my own fiber.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Mar 3, 2015, at 8:42 AM, Josh Luthman
LOL, so true.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
You never regret running fiber.
*From:* Brett A Mansfield br...@silverlakeinternet.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:45 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Im trying
The range severely drops when you're getting more beamwidth and sacrificing
forward gain.
Have you looked at 28 GHz from CTI? I think that sounds like an ideal
solution for you.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015
Anyone know if there is any 60GHz PTMP solution out there yet? All of my towers
cover less than half a mile so short range 60GHz would be ideal for me. I am
competing with fiber and would like to offer similar speeds.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
Silver Lake Internet
You never regret running fiber.
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:45 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Im trying to avoid expensive licensed links. My customer base is too small for
now. If I have to spend money on licensed links for such a small area
@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
The range severely drops when you're getting more beamwidth and sacrificing
forward gain.
Have you looked at 28 GHz from CTI? I think that sounds like an ideal solution
for you.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite
cost of materials can be around $1/foot plus the cost of trenching.
How far do you have to go?
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Seems like running fiber might be the best way. I was just hoping there was a
good wireless
on.
Then there was the ultraviolet light system that required reflection from
airborne dust particles.
*From:* Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:42 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
The range severely drops when you're getting more beamwidth and
sacrificing
cost of materials can be around $1/foot plus the cost of trenching.
How far do you have to go?
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Seems like running fiber might be the best way. I was just hoping there was a
good
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz
Its PTMP, so if I run fiber it would be to the home. In the neighborhood I'm in
it's about 400 homes right now. They are on phase 2 of 9. The next 2 phases are
high density housing and then the rest are homes to total about 2400 homes.
Laying fiber will be easy
64 matches
Mail list logo