You have too much time on your hands. :-)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Martin Trübner
Sent: 08/09/2010 07:43 AM
What happened to opcode C83 ---
C80 is MVCOS
C81 is ECTG
C82 CSST
C84 will be LPD
C85 will be LPDG
but where is C83 ?
the C8 rage looks like
The server uses just one subtask for this function. (It is multi-threated.)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Martin Trübner
Sent: 09/20/2010 10:34 AM
Tony,
But, the client is specific to a subtask.
Why would that be?...is it a CICS or something, where there is not too
much
this 'invalid' area.
Did I have it wrong?
--
Tony Thigpen
Almost 4700 lines of prolog!
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Edward Jaffe
Sent: 12/09/2010 11:48 AM
On 12/9/2010 8:35 AM, Walt Farrell wrote:
In which book, Ed? I couldn't find it.
Books?! Who uses them? The best documentation for any modern z/OS macro
is in
the macro
I wish someone would say what you said in chapter 4 of publication
SA22-7614-07 MVS Programming: Extended Addressability Guide. That doc
says that above the bar starts at 2 GB instead of 4 GB.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Peter Relson
Sent: 12/10/2010 07:46 AM
I wish you
I think we are looking at it wrong. The old style should be called
'register based programming' and baseless style as nothing special.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: john gilmore
Sent: 12/18/2010 01:32 PM
In the future baseless, always an ugly term embodying a dubious pun
BAKR/PR is available in z/VSE, but has the restriction that it can't be
used in an OCEXIT is in place. Since I am a low-level program, I can't
take the chance and use BAKR/PR.
Also, I failed to mention that my routines work for both batch and under
CICS.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message
Personally, I consider a 'branch to abnormal exit' much better than
trying to unwind all the 'perform' levels, be it COBOL or Assembler.
I have seen programs where they attempted to unwind everything during an
error and ended up processing code unintentionally.
Tony Thigpen
-Original
Has anyone found a 3270 emulator for Android yet?
--
Tony Thigpen
',A(PK_CHAR)
+ DCA(SUPPORT_EMAIL_ADDR),A(L'SUPPORT_EMAIL_ADDR)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sent: 06/04/2011 01:22 PM
On Jun 3, 2011, at 16:19, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 6/3/2011 2:08 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
Here is a simple solution. Create a $DC
get lost.
Tony Thigpen
PS, please consider the aspect that almost everyone now 'top post'.
(Yes, I know, early users advocated 'bottom post', but times have
changed and left that standard behind.)
-Original Message -
From: Ken Brick
Sent: 08/23/2011 05:55 AM
On 23/08/2011 07:05 AM
), all target client systems require the same
update.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Tony Harminc
Sent: 08/30/2011 11:52 AM
On 29 August 2011 18:22, Tony Thigpent...@vse2pdf.com wrote:
Unfortunately, since IBM does not support a .boo bookreader on 64bit
linux, the option
script
to take care of setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, Java classpath, and other
such glue code. I use SoftCopy Reader's API to output HTML and images
from the BookManager files. I then pass this to htmldoc for PDF conversion.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Mike Shaw
Sent: 08/30/2011
manual, they state: The operation codes
supported by High Level Assembler are described in the documents listed
under “Related Publications (Architecture)” on page 451. Which manual
in that section is it refereeing to? None of them seem correct from the
title.
--
Tony Thigpen
was attempting to use some of the halfword-imm stuff. I just picked
the wrong instructions. So, again, back to using old instructions.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Martin Trübner
Sent: 10/11/2011 06:34 AM
Tony,
ZS4 does not work on our HLASM.
But ZS4 is what you need
This is on VSE, but should be the same as z/OS
Does anyone know h to make an assembler program fetchable by ceefetch()?
--
Tony Thigpen
Personally, I would do it with REXX.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Patrick Roehl
Sent: 11/17/2011 12:29 PM
I’d like to be able to build various versions of a COBOL program by doing
something like a conditional assembly. Has anyone does anything like this?
Is it possible
, not COBOL. Same with C.
For a sample REXX (although from VSE) that pre-processes a COBOL program
replacing specific code with another code, have a look at my sample
BSTTPREP at http://www.vse2pdf.com/coolstuff.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Patrick Roehl
Sent: 11/18/2011 01:26
Yanic,
If you don't want to walk the pointers yourself, just call EZACIC08.
Although it's intended to help with HLL's like Cobol, it can also be
called from Assembler.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Yanick Jacques
Sent: 01/05/2012 01:30 PM
I'm avancing in my developpement,now
it in an non-aggressive manner. Many of us have just learned to delete
his emails before reading.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Chris Mason
Sent: 01/06/2012 06:35 AM
Yanick
This is the *assembler* list. It is *not* a list where you can expect
everyone to be familiar
are currently evaluating that
option for one of my customers.
Of course, we all know that the Opies always understate their costs. :-)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: McKown, John
Sent: 01/11/2012 08:35 AM
I will defer to your greater knowledge. The program that I'm working on right now
If you think regular C linkage is 'strange', wait until you have to code
using XPLink conventions.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: McKown, John
Sent: 01/11/2012 09:21 AM
I almost hate to admit it, but the code in question is LE enabled. So it starts with a CEEENTRY
macro
I doubt anyone is still running ES 9000 boxes.
I have paying customers on 9672s, MP2000, MP3000, etc.
VSE, not z/OS.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Ray Mullins
Sent: 01/16/2012 01:48 PM
Arrgh. Correction to the below. Not enough caffeine, yet it's late in
the morning
Code that said:
Mike told me this condition could never happen. If this abend ever
happens, call John at xxx-xxx- and tell him that Mike owes him $100.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Shane G
Sent: 02/10/2012 06:06 AM
On Fri, Feb 10th, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Sharuff Morsa3
the mainframe works. At that price, how can you go wrong.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Prashant m
Sent: 03/16/2012 11:39 AM
Hi All,
Thanks all for the quick response.
Yes,I am planning for individual study,and yes,I have a test system in our
environment where I have sufficient
Switch CLC operands works, but leaves the code messier.
CLC =C'OPEN ',COMMAND
CLC =C'CLOSE ',COMMAND
CLC =C'TERMINATE ',COMMAND
CLC =C'END ',COMMAND
vs:
CLC:2 COMMAND,=C'OPEN '
CLC:2 COMMAND,=C'CLOSE '
CLC:2 COMMAND,=C'TERMINATE '
CLC:2 COMMAND,=C'END '
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message
' is not as important to me as the ability. The 'CLC:2'
just seems to be the best suggestion right now. Although, I would not
have minded something like: CLC COMMAND(#),=C'OPEN '
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Rob van der Heij
Sent: 05/23/2012 11:51 AM
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:51 PM
OPS! typo.
MVC WF_MASK,0(R1)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Tony Thigpen
Sent: 05/29/2012 01:31 PM
I decided just to code a table. Here is the basics:
SLL R15,2
L R1,=A(@MASKS)
LA R1,0(R15,R1)
MVC WF_MASK,0(R15)
MASKALL DC X'FF'
MASK0 DC X'FF00
for many years, we do not want to kick them while
they are down just so we can do 'fancier' code.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: John Gilmore
Sent: 06/02/2012 06:57 PM
David Bond writes:
begin extract
But really, for over 15 years base registers are only required for
data areas
I have yet to find that VSE-customer that pays for Vendor-software and
has no money for hardware or operating-system-software AND demands
new features.
We have several that meet this requirement. Think about the VSE 2.6 on
P390 ESL boxes.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From
number of bits. (I will then 'and' both
addresses and then use a simple CLC.)
Although a table built at compile time might be a reasonable solution, I
thought this would be a good time to learn a new trick if someone has
one they can share.
--
Tony Thigpen
Where is you DFHEIENT?
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Mainframe Mainframe
Sent: 07/27/2012 10:27 AM
I'm trying to make a little CICS Assembler program an I get always a 0C4 at
execution. DFHSR0618 CICSPROD An illegal macro call or reference to the CSA
or TCA. Here's my
It's because you have x20 bytes of 'something' generated by the BEGIN
macro that is before your CSECT statement. So, it's something in how the
BEGIN macro is coded.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Micheal Butz
Sent: 08/23/2012 04:44 AM
Hi,
My program source has a TITLE
Your code requires 2 scratch registers. The following uses just 1
scratch register and does not require literal storage:
LA R0,3
NR R0,R15
LTR R0,R0
BNZ BAD_RC
(I still have to use code that works on boxes without the jump
instructions.)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From
I also use the CL to catch negatives. One of those tricks I got from
this list.
Why the LTR? I don't know. I guess the reason is that I don't hardly
ever use an 'and' so I failed to notice that NR set the correct
condition code when I wrote this many years ago.
Tony Thigpen
-Original
Assumes address is in a storage location.
Most of the discussion has been based on the premise that we are talking
about an error code in R15, although the code I was copying was from the
start of the program where Rx contains a function code.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From
Could someone send me a copy of FCNTL.H? (offlist!)
I need to compare some of the values to those used by our VSE IP product.
Thanks.
--
Tony Thigpen
I did receive a copy of fcntl.h, but it is missing one value that I
need, F_DUPFD2. Could someone tell me the value for F_DUPFD2?
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Tony Thigpen
Sent: 11/26/2012 04:29 PM
Could someone send me a copy of FCNTL.H? (offlist!)
I need to compare some
Yes. Thanks
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: 11/27/2012 06:59 AM
Hi
If you mean this:
#define F_SETFL 4
#define F_GETLK 5
#define F_SETLK 6
#define F_SETLKW 7
#define F_DUPFD2 8
#define F_CLOSFD 9
#define
Amem to John Robert
Driving off the inexperienced only hurts our profession.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Bodoh John Robert [Contractor]
Sent: 04/18/2013 12:17 PM
What loss? This listserv is for both the experienced and inexperienced. The
inexperienced participants ask
Does anybody know off hand if I can in invoke the VSE Assembler from
another (assembler) program and pass it the input to be assembled?
I was thinking I remember an exit, but I can't find it right now.
Tony Thigpen
Found it! (As always, I found it just after posting a message for help.)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Tony Thigpen
Sent: 05/30/2013 01:19 PM
Does anybody know off hand if I can in invoke the VSE Assembler from
another (assembler) program and pass it the input
to generate your own ASMAOPT and see what happens.
FYI, VSE supplies their own modified assembler default option macro.
Look at SKASMOPT in library 59. I don't know if it affects COMPAT.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Martin Truebner
Sent: 08/02/2013 06:25 AM
I try to get
entry
R5 = @ of key to match
offset and length of key are EQUs KOFF and KLGH
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Don Higgins
Sent: 10/24/2013 06:50 AM
All
I see discussion about optimizing the binary search, but I don't see any
discussion about optimizing linear search which might
modify R0, R1 and R15. If we need to, we can make
R4-R7 'modifiable'.
All entries will be fixed length. Can't really have variable length and
use a binary search. :-)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: John Gilmore
Sent: 10/24/2013 12:26 PM
Tony,
The code you want must address
a refference pointer to the actual data to be compared. But,
the pointer table is still a fixed length table. :-)
You just can't binary search a variable length table.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: 10/24/2013 05:12 PM
At 12:45 -0400 on 10/24/2013
to figure it out for sure, but I would almost
bet that such logic that Chris suggested would only be faster than a
linear search if the table is very large and the rows very short.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sent: 10/24/2013 06:00 PM
On 2013-10-24 15:51, John
Repost the code. Nothing I still have in my inbox shows code to perform
a binary search of a table where each row occurrence can be any length.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: robin
Sent: 10/24/2013 08:15 PM
From: Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 8
length rows requires the building of
a secondary table with fixed rows before a binary search can be used.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: robin
Sent: 10/24/2013 08:58 PM
From: Savor, Tom tom.sa...@fisglobal.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 11:40 AM
Robin,
InterestingI
Convert your PLX code to assembler and you will see that you are binary
searching a pointer table that has fixed length entries.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: robin
Sent: 10/25/2013 04:52 AM
From: Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 12:16 PM
As I don't know PL/I or PLX and this is the Assembler list, let's talk
assembler.
You stated that your code produced a binary search against a table where
each row was variable length.
I said binary search can't work on such a table.
So, produce the code in assembler.
Tony Thigpen
Maybe that explains the disconnect.
I am saying that all ROWs must be of equal length. Each row may contain
one or more fields. I did not say that the individual data fields in the
row must be fixed length.
In other words, each table occurance must be the same length.
Tony Thigpen
the feature.
In the case where I saw this, nobody had installed the feature for the
first user of the box. It had been resold, so was no longer eligible.
Have you tested the code on another physical box?
Have you done a KM Query (function code is 0) to see what encryption is
available?
Tony
'
SVC 12
It looks like the first should be changed to
JNE *+2+2
and the second to
JNO *+2+3+1
Am I reading the book right?
--
Tony Thigpen
I try to balance the use of B *+2+4 style branches against the
cluttering up by using a bunch of labels. It's never for more than 2
instructions.
Nothing worse than looking at long series of tests followed by bit
setting instructions where every other instruction has a label.
Tony Thigpen
In z/VSE, they charge extra for the IF macro. We don't have them.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Ed Jaffe
Sent: 12/04/2013 03:29 PM
On 12/4/2013 12:16 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Nothing worse than looking at long series of tests followed by bit
setting instructions where every
) macros actually make reading
someone else's code, or debugging it, harder. Macros should make coding
simpler. These do just the opposite.
In other words, I don't like them.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Adam L Johanson
Sent: 12/04/2013 05:27 PM
Well, sure, but all the ugly
FYI, my products are assembled on my linux desktop with Dignus.
While, another company, for which I do some major development work,
performs all assemblies on z/VM.
I have not assembled my VSE code on VSE in years. :-)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Ed Jaffe
Sent: 12/04/2013
329E thought 32A1 are hidden. I can handle hidden
instructions in system macros, but not in, what I would consider, open
code where I may have fat-fingered something. I guess I rely too much on
looking at the generated code when debugging.
To each his own.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message
,X0080),R9 are really
nice to prevent errors.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Ed Jaffe
Sent: 12/04/2013 05:45 PM
On 12/4/2013 1:37 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
Well, sure, but all the ugly generated labels and such are there when
you have to read the listing rather than the source
Ron,
Thanks for the link. This is more in line with my type of writing than
the current IF macros. They might be something I can really use.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Rob van der Heij
Sent: 12/05/2013 04:43 AM
On 5 December 2013 08:22, Ed Jaffe edja
Like Obama-care?
:-)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: John McKown
Sent: 12/05/2013 07:57 PM
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
You just don't know what the other person went through or what pressure
they were under to create the code
Does anybody know of a list of instructions with what model processor
they were first available on?
--
Tony Thigpen
It's really just a case that, as a vendor, I need to be careful of what
'new' instructions I add to my code. I don't want to dual path based on
STFLE, but instead, code to my best guest as to my current 'lowest
denominator' customer.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Mark Boonie
Just wondering, what position did my name come in? :-)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: John Gilmore
Sent: 01/02/2014 04:27 PM
Cliff McNeill gets the book, which I'll put into the mail on Saturday
after we've dug out from under a mini-blizzard---just over a foot of
snow
Even though I did not receive the book, thanks for offering it and
sending to someone.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: John Gilmore
Sent: 01/02/2014 06:06 PM
On 1/2/14, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com wrote:
Just wondering, what position did my name come in? :-)
Tony Thigpen
-area macros. Also, column positions are so important
to COBOL and Assembler and it seems that most pc editors are designed
for free-form source like C or java.
Have you found decent IDE plug-ins for your languages?
Is the time right for moving to a pc based IDE for mainframe development?
Tony
Greg,
There is a first edition available on ebay for $40.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Gray Gregory
Sent: 01/15/2014 06:22 AM
Mr. Gilmore,
If you have any copies left, please send me one, thanks
GREGORY GRAY
IRS, Information Technology Specialist
OS:CTO:AD:IM:CA:C
No. It's for those with COBOL experience. I just assumed that since you
were on this list, that COBOL would be part of your knowledge base.
(Most Mainframe assembler programmers did time as a COBOL programmer.)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Tim Lost
Sent: 01/15/2014 05:08 PM
Well, I did say most. :-)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Ed Jaffe
Sent: 01/15/2014 05:28 PM
On 1/15/2014 2:17 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
(Most Mainframe assembler programmers did time as a COBOL programmer.)
Really? My other old school mainframe languages are FORTRAN and PL/I
Are you saying that all assembler programmers (including those on the
Assembler-List) are only for Systems Programmers? I am sure there are a
lot of assembler application programmers here also.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Gord Tomlin
Sent: 01/15/2014 05:53 PM
On 2014-01-15
I work with a company that buys and sells z9's here in the US and uses
them in our DR facility.
We have handled 2 different z9s that were delivered originally in the US
that did NOT have the feature installed. Use of the KLM instructions
returned an operation exception on both boxes.
Tony
Within a macro, I need the length of a parm passed to the macro. What is
the format of the seta statement?
open code:
mymac word=abcd
mymac word=abcdefg
macro code:
macro
mymac word=
word_length seta ???what do I use here
--
Tony Thigpen
thanks.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: John McKown
Sent: 02/12/2014 10:02 AM
I think it is K'WORD
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ASMR1020/9.3.6
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com wrote:
Within a macro, I need
be a better way.)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Martin Truebner
Sent: 02/12/2014 11:05 AM
Tony,
judge for yourself
1 MACRO
2 X A
3 LA SETA K'A
4 MNOTE 'LENGTH OF A IS LA'
5 MEND
6 XPARAMETER
7+LENGTH
Now, that solution I like. I will have to also add 1 to the max
value also.
Off to test.
Well, I tested it and I like it better than my original solution.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Jon Perryman
Sent: 02/12/2014 02:35 PM
Your counter doesn't have to start at 0
Yep.
QVIS_L EQU L'QVSIMGLOGICALPARTITIONNAME
MVC 0(QVIS_L,R4,QVSIMGLOGICALPARTITIONNAME
Of course, you can always play the it will never change card with:
MVC 0(8,R4,QVSIMGLOGICALPARTITIONNAME
knowing that changing the length of this field will require an act of god.
Tony
The IBMer that created that field name should be shot, quartered, then
rung up the pole.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Tony Thigpen
Sent: 02/20/2014 03:56 PM
Yep.
QVIS_L EQU L'QVSIMGLOGICALPARTITIONNAME
MVC 0(QVIS_L,R4,QVSIMGLOGICALPARTITIONNAME
Of course, you
To clarify, I dropped a word somehow. It should have read:
...industry standard ACRONYM so .
I was talking about using LPAR in the name instead of LOGICALPARTITION.
Although I don't personally use CamelCase, it would have made it a
little better.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message
In the VSE arena, we still have a lot of FCOBOL stuff out there at a lot
of sites. I am working with one of they right now to help plan a conversion.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Steve Comstock
Sent: 03/03/2014 12:40 PM
On 3/3/2014 10:33 AM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 3/3/2014 8
that nobody wanted to download it.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Ze'ev Atlas
Sent: 03/18/2014 09:21 PM
Well, I was trying to refresh the mainframe by bringing in some open source and
ported a whole library [PCRE for z/OS see zaconsultants.net ].
Here are the issues, beyond
in any shop I ever manage.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: zatl...@yahoo.com
Sent: 03/24/2014 07:46 AM
Which means that libraries that do some functionality cannot be ported because
'they were not invented here'. If this is correct, no wonder that the classic
mainframe is dying
experience with regular expressions. I have written code using
them. (I now wish I had not.) I have debugged regular expressions
written by others. I know believe they should be eliminated and never
used again. Just like Vi.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Ze'ev Atlas
Sent: 03/26
my mind. I just doubt it. :-)
Maybe you should start a thread: Why COBOL needs Regular Expressions.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: zatl...@yahoo.com
Sent: 03/26/2014 07:54 AM
I share your sentiment about vi which I consider to be a bug, not a feature. I
agree that there could
Tom,
Please reread my statement that you even quoted. I was talking about
NUMBERS and how they are stored.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Tom Marchant
Sent: 03/26/2014 09:42 AM
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:24:09 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Now, as to COBOL, we normally deal
Just wondering.
What hardware first supported PCs?
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: John Gilmore
Sent: 05/21/2014 10:40 AM
Institutional inertia is a problem in most mainframe shops. The
PC-based machinery that made SVCs obsolescent is now, however, more
than twenty years old
or did not work?
Thanks,
Tony Thigpen
Thanks, that means that I my thinking is in the right direction.
For the pipi call, do you remember if it was the CEEPIPI(init_sub_dp)
function?
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Sam Siegel
Sent: 07/05/2014 01:51 PM
Tony. In z/os I've done the following:
1) root task attaches
Thanks.
Examples are not necessary. I have used dub_dp before. I was just unsure
if I had the right approach.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Sam Siegel
Sent: 07/05/2014 05:30 PM
Yes it is right direction. Yes it is sub_dp. I can dig out examples on
Monday.
Also
, how do I fix this macro?
--
Tony Thigpen
Never mind. I have been working on this code without enough sleep this
week. :-)
Here I was looking at the macro and I should have been looking at the
variable being used.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Tony Thigpen
Sent: 07/12/2014 08:42 PM
For years, I have used
There is just so much wrong with several things you mentioned.
But, based on your last statement, you don't care anyway, so I, for one,
will not bother.
I just pity the poor people you work with.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Steve Hobson
Sent: 07/22/2014 04:25 PM
John
, everybody wants someone else to do it, so they don't perform
even the simplest thing. The man-hours that could be saved by that same
programmer reinventing the wheel would have more than covered the time
it would have taken him to update a spreadsheet listing macros.
Tony Thigpen
-Original
Where is the programmer manager during all this? Did he not bother to do
even a basic code review? It looks like he did not control his people so
things went down fast.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: David Stokes
Sent: 07/23/2014 11:05 AM
I don't totally disagree with you
that
indicated they used such.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Binyamin Dissen
Sent: 04/10/2011 11:51 AM
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:23:15 -0400 Joe Owens joe_ow...@standardlife.com
wrote:
:After such a great response to my last post, I thought I would try here
:again for some useful
(or allow)
abbreviations.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: John Gilmore
Sent: 07/29/2014 10:57 AM
All of the comments on and objections to the use of CIDTs of
keyword-parameter values were interesting, and some of them were
drôle.
The notion that coding say action=C instead
62DCX'0008'
00840084 00A0 63ORG
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Peter Relson
Sent: 08/07/2014 07:45 AM
A supervisor state program's updating of CR3 is surely not supported but
is impossible to prevent. As with many things it will work in some cases
the top of my head.)
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Robert Ngan
Sent: 08/18/2014 12:20 PM
We use code of the form:
WorkArea DSECT
WORD DSF
FOO DSX
BAR DSY
WorkLen EQU *-WorkArea
DS(WORKL-WorkLen)X
If WorkLen exceeds WORKL, the final
Paul,
Please verify that Static Eye is actually correctly populated in the
dump. Although it is a DC, it may be in a DSECT so not populated.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: esst...@juno.com
Sent: 08/17/2014 05:32 PM
Static Eye is a Constant in memory, I dont write anything
register:
SAR R7,R1
You switch into AR mode:
SAC 512
you can now use R7 to access another partition's memory
MVC 0(5,R12),0(R7)COPY DATA TO MY PARTITION
You switch out of AR mode:
SAC 0
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Ward, Mike S
Sent: 08/27/2014 09:57 AM
Hello
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
