--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BULLY!
Now was this Bully! meant in the sense that you think Eric is
someone who
picks on people he thinks are weaker than him, or in the sense of
strong
agreement as was the
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:21:20 -0600
At 07:13 AM 2/28/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From:
Well, you're half right (2/3). Again, as long as we are being
honest, the posts of yours that I have read have been a waste
of my time. Not surprising you and Rob would enjoy each
other's babble. Although it is disappointing that you make so
little effort to discern sense from nonsense
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:06:19AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey, I thought you were done with this thread long ago... Why are you
still here?
You thought wrong. Read what I wrote. Did you see the word thread? I
was writing to a specific person. Although, that doesn't mean I AM
going
-Original Message-
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:42 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:06:19AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey, I thought you
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:34:00PM -0800, Chad Cooper wrote:
When I hear someone say Goodbye, particularly in the way you said
it, I ALWAYS assume that means they are about to leave,
I said goodbye to a specific person.
regular goodbye like I'll be see'n ya.. You have me confused at this
And becouse ... BULLY!
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:06:19AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey, I thought you were done with this thread long ago... Why are
you
still here?
You thought wrong. Read what I wrote. Did you
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:34:00PM -0800, Chad Cooper wrote:
When I hear someone say Goodbye, particularly in the way you
said
it, I ALWAYS assume that means they are about to leave,
I said goodbye to a specific person.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew said:
You are calling Jan Jane, like its somehow sub-optimal to be a
women.
Actually, he isn't. He's calling Jan Jane because Jan keeps
calling
Erik by variants of his name with additional or alternative
letters.
BULLY!
Besides you want to talk about S/N ratio,
You know, you keep talking about S/N and so I got to
thinking, you know, I don't think it's others S/N, I think that your
nyquist is just not high enough.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:17:44PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Jeez Erik, you don't even know the guy. Andrew's a damn good fellow
and not prone to noise. I can understand you not agreeing with him,
but these knee-jerk retorts are just plain silliness on your part.
And you don't read so
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:17:44PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Jeez Erik, you
Jan Coffey wrote:
I'm sorry if you take this personaly.
I didn't take it personally. I just thought that engaging in fat
jokes was even more childish than Erik's comment, and that it,
in my mind at least, weakened your position and made you look bad.
Jim
Erik Reuter wrote:
Jane's posts
Mmm, the sweet smell of eighth grade taunting. Let's see, we've had
fat jokes and calling the other guy a girl. Can making fun of one
another's mom be far behind? :)
Jim
Your momma's so fat she stepped on a dollar and made change Maru
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 06:39:55 -0500
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:17:44PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Jeez
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:14:34 -0600
Travis Edmunds wrote:
Ah, but if you have ever seen how flies
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:26:43PM -0330, Travis Edmunds wrote:
First of all, let me say that after getting to know Robert a bit
in the last few months, I think he's a pretty cool guy. In direct
contrast to you of course; and I'm not too sure that he posts much
insincere psychobabble
In a message dated 2/28/2004 6:23:58 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Their argument being that biology dictates that you are born with either
tab A or slot B.* Biology designed tab A to fit into slot B, and
biology didn't design two tab As or two slot Bs to fit
Travis Edmunds wrote:
I urge caution Erik. For Robert drinks from this spring regularly. And
second time around he may not be so nice to the little piggy wiggy.
Little piggy wiggy?
Please.
If Erik is a pig, he's Some Pig!
Julia
wondering how many people will miss the reference
Julia Thompson wrote:
If Erik is a pig, he's Some Pig!
I'd even argue he's Terrific!
Jim
That was an easy one Maru
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
___
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:04:30 -0500 (EST), Jim Sharkey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
If Erik is a pig, he's Some Pig!
I'd even argue he's Terrific!
Jim
That was an easy one Maru
Aye, not much of a tangled web...
--
Doug
___
BULLY!
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:17:44PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Jeez Erik, you don't even know the guy. Andrew's a damn good
fellow
and not prone to noise. I can understand you not agreeing
with him,
but these
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:14:34
BULLY!
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:26:43PM -0330, Travis Edmunds wrote:
First of all, let me say that after getting to know Robert a bit
in the last few months, I think he's a pretty cool guy. In direct
contrast to you of
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travis Edmunds wrote:
I urge caution Erik. For Robert drinks from this spring
regularly. And
second time around he may not be so nice to the little piggy
wiggy.
Little piggy wiggy?
Please.
If Erik is a pig, he's
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BULLY!
Now was this Bully! meant in the sense that you think Eric is someone who
picks on people he thinks are weaker than him, or in the sense of strong
agreement as was the expression used by President Theodore Roosevelt? :-)
Michael Harney
[EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:57:03PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
In fact, I have had the same BMI at a time when I was woefully out of
shape as I had a few years later when I'd gotten into the best shape
of my life, because I'd lost as much fat weight as I had gained muscle
weight. :)
I think
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:07:10 -0600
At 04:05 PM 2/27/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
Biology taking
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:38:32PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
You know, I'm a little touchy about this right now. Maybe I shouldn't
be, but I am.
Funny, the comment didn't even register on me. Most of it is because I
don't pay a lot of attention
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:18:11AM +1100, Andrew Paul wrote:
Erik, I am a little confused.
I agree.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Andrew said:
You are calling Jan Jane, like its somehow sub-optimal to be a
women.
Actually, he isn't. He's calling Jan Jane because Jan keeps calling
Erik by variants of his name with additional or alternative letters.
Rich
___
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:18:11AM +1100, Andrew Paul wrote:
Erik, I am a little confused.
I agree.
Well, thats what happens when people don't explain themselves properly.
It was a fairly simple question.
Andrew
From: Richard Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew said:
You are calling Jan Jane, like its somehow sub-optimal to be a
women.
Actually, he isn't. He's calling Jan Jane because Jan keeps calling
Erik by variants of his name with additional or alternative letters.
Yes, quite possibly, I
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:41:40AM +1100, Andrew Paul wrote:
Anyway, no matter, they do go on like a pair of old women don't they !
You do go on like a doofus, don't you?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
Erik said:
You do go on like a doofus, don't you?
I don't know if Andrew does, but I know I do!
Rich
GCU Single Line Reply
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:39:22PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
Erik said:
You do go on like a doofus, don't you?
I don't know if Andrew does, but I know I do!
Occasionally, everyone does I think. But your S/N is quite high. So far
as I have seen, his is very low.
--
Erik Reuter
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:51:02 -0500
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:39:22PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
Erik
Travis Edmunds wrote:
Ah, but if you have ever seen how flies cluster about the brimming milk
pails on a dairy farm in early summer...
All the dairy farms I've hung out on were using milking machines, no
pails, no access to vast quantities of milk for the flies
Julia
and there
At 07:13 AM 2/28/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:07:10 -0600
At 04:05 PM 2/27/04,
- Original Message -
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Andrew said:
You are calling Jan Jane, like its somehow sub-optimal to be a
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:39:22PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
Erik said:
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:05:47 -0600
Is Erik leaving the group?
Will other people complain?
Will the
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
Oh yes thank you for reminding me, I had almost forgotten all
about
you Erick.
Come to mention it I also forot these words: bully, adipose,
corpulent, fleshy, gross, heavy, obese, overblown, overweight,
Jan Coffey wrote:
However, you would think that if it's ok to raz someone claiming that
they look pathetic becouse of something they did, why is it not ok to
raz them back about looking pathetic becouse of something they did
not do? (Namely get enough exercice for their caloric intake) Or if
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:38:32PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
You know, I'm a little touchy about this right now. Maybe I shouldn't
be, but I am.
Funny, the comment didn't even register on me. Most of it is because I
don't pay a lot of attention to Jane's posts anyway since the S/N is so
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:19:58 -
SNIP!!
Personaly I would have prefered no personal attacks at all, but
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:38:32 -0600
Jan Coffey wrote:
However, you would think that if it's ok to raz
At 04:05 PM 2/27/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:38:32 -0600
Jan Coffey wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
However, you would think that if it's ok to raz someone claiming
that
they look pathetic becouse of something they did, why is it not
ok to
raz them back about looking pathetic becouse of something they
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:38:32PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
You know, I'm a little touchy about this right now. Maybe I
shouldn't
be, but I am.
Funny, the comment didn't even register on me. Most of it is
because I
Jan Coffey wrote:
Two people can have the same BMI, but a different percent body fat. A
person with adiquate muscle mass and a low percent body fat may have
the same BMI as a person who has a lot of body fat because BMI is
calculated using weight and height only.
In fact, I have had the
Awww, pooor Jan. Hurt his itty bitty ego when he couldn't
support absurdities with a wittle evidence wevidence. Aww.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:46:13PM -, Jan Coffey
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:04:49PM -, iaamoac wrote:
IAAMOAC to you too Mac.
I'm certainly not a member of YOUR civilization. Now, if I started a
constitutional amendment to stop you from marrying certain women that I
don't approve of, then maybe I would be in your ballpark...
--
Erik
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:04:49PM -, iaamoac wrote:
IAAMOAC to you too Mac.
I'm certainly not a member of YOUR civilization.
Which is, of course, exactly what David Brin meant by that.
JDG
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:04:38PM -, iaamoac wrote:
Which is, of course, exactly what David Brin meant by that.
I don't think it means what you think it means. It certainly doesn't
give you the right to go around forcing your will on others.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:04:38PM -, iaamoac wrote:
Which is, of course, exactly what David Brin meant by that.
I don't think it means what you think it means. It certainly doesn't
give you the right to go around forcing
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:46:13PM -, Jan Coffey wrote:
How exactly is missrepresentation and bullying any different Erick?
I don't usually answer questions with questions, Jane, but this is
ridiculous. You honestly don't see the difference between using the
force of law (i.e., making a new
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:04:38PM -, iaamoac wrote:
Which is, of course, exactly what David Brin meant by that.
I don't think it means what you think it means.
Inconceivable!
Julia
___
Jan Coffey wrote:
Oh yes thank you for reminding me, I had almost forgotten all about
you Erick.
Come to mention it I also forot these words: bully, adipose,
corpulent, fleshy, gross, heavy, obese, overblown, overweight,
porcine, portly, pursy, stout, upholstered, weighty, beefy, bulky,
Julia Thompson wrote:
Inconceivable!
You made the classic Internet blunder! The first is never get
involved in a flame war on Brin-L, but only slightly less well known
is never show off your vocabulary when a bunch of know-it-alls are online! :)
Jim
Amusing people for fun but no profit since
Jim Sharkey wrote:
However, while I enjoy unpacking my adjectives as much, if not more,
than the next guy, I have to say, Jan, that falling back on fat
jokes is not the best way to gain the sympathy of, well, anybody with
two synapses capable firing in concert.
Hm. Anyone who's been to a
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Seeberger wrote:
xponent
All Your Soap Are Ours Maru
rob
All your soap are belong to us?
Somebody set up us the bath.
Move Zest for great justice!
_
Get a FREE online computer virus
From: Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:09:26 -0500 (EST)
Julia Thompson wrote:
Inconceivable!
You made the classic Internet blunder! The first
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:46:13PM -, Jan Coffey wrote:
How exactly is
Oh yes thank you for reminding me, I had almost forgotten all about
you Erick.
Come to mention it I also forot these words: bully, adipose,
corpulent, fleshy, gross, heavy, obese, overblown, overweight,
porcine, portly, pursy, stout, upholstered, weighty, beefy, bulky,
chunky, dumpy,
66 matches
Mail list logo
