Hi,
I am trying to compare a published EM map with X-ray map in hand, and have
several questions:
1. EM map seldom indicates the sigma level, and it was said because of the
box size uncertainty during EM model construction. Now, I wonder is there
any way we can sort of its equivalent sigma level
. If they used EMAN then most likely the CCP4 format is still bogus
but MRC works fine.
Jürgen
On Jun 2, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compare a published EM map with X-ray map in hand, and have
several questions:
1. EM map seldom indicates the sigma level
phenix.fmodel model.pdb high_res=20
then load them in Coot and you will get your answer.
Pavel.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Hailiang Zhang zhan...@umbc.edu wrote:
Hi there,
I have a preliminary question. For very low resolution data, say 10A or
even lower, is the density map supposed
Hi,
I have a preliminary question. I understand Rfree reflection sets are
never used during automatic refinement, but, when generating the real
space density maps, do we have to exclude Rfree columns? Any references
will also be greatly appreciated!
Best Regards, Hailiang
I meant :when generating the real space density maps, do we have to
exclude Rfree reflections?
Hi,
I have a preliminary question. I understand Rfree reflection sets are
never used during automatic refinement, but, when generating the real
space density maps, do we have to exclude Rfree
we may have the so-called model-bias issue?
Hailiang
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Hailiang Zhang zhan...@umbc.edu wrote:
I have a preliminary question. I understand Rfree reflection sets are
never used during automatic refinement, but, when generating the real
space density maps, do we
:17, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Thanks Nat! I am not doing real space refinement. Actually I am only
using
the maps for manual model building/adjustments. In this case, if some
Rfree reflections have strong scattering intensities, removing them may
lead to featureless density maps. However, if we
of space.
Pavel.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Hailiang Zhang zhan...@umbc.edu wrote:
Hi,
As I understand, the general molecular mask generated by CCP4 (eg
sfall+mapmask) are binary mask file which needs lots of memory space. I
just wonder whether we can generate some small mask files
Hi,
Is there any way to quickly evaluate the LLG(log-likelihood) value by
given the structure factor information only (Fo, sigmaFo and Fc)? Thanks
in advance for any information!
Best regards, Hailiang
Thanks a lot!
If you are trying to make a mask in spacegroup P21, that;s not the way
to do it.
Make the mask in NCSMASK without a symmetry keyword. Then run mapmask to
change the spacegroup to P 21 and use EXPAND OVERLAP to generate the
symmetry copies of the mask.
Hailiang Zhang wrote
Hi,
I want to generate a mask using NCSMASK; however, whenever I tried to add
the SYMMETRY keyword, and output mask cannot be opened in coot. The
following is my script and I was testing on PDB# 2VZ8. Thanks in advance
for any suggestions:
ncsmask xyzin ${EOMDATA}/2VZ8.pdb mskout 2VZ8-ncs.msk
again for your time!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Thanks Edward! Actually Areaimol works well for my problem.
But now I have a new issue looking for some advice. I want to randomly
generate some points in the unit cell and make a quick judgment whether
it
is outside
radius 2.0
new pdb m1 ref.pdb
smooth m1 10
smooth m1 10
smooth m1 10
island m1
fill m1
write m1 ref.msk
eof
I think the Uppsala mask format is different from the ccp4 one, but that
it is easy
to convert.
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi Edward:
Yes, this is really a good way to do it. Now I am
Hi,
I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether there
are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well as
the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual surfaces
is
of atoms and the distance separating
them.
this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.
For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins
Dear Zbyszek:
Thanks a lot for your good summary. It is very interesting but, do you
think there are some references for more detailed description, especially
from mathematics point of view about correlating B-factor to the Gaussian
probability distribution (the B-factor unit of A^2 is my first
Hi all;
It is described by http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/html/dm_skeletonisation.html;
that the skeletonisation has two adjustable parameters (join point
cutoff, and end point cutoff), but the DM tutorial seems didn't instruct
how to specify them, and I am just wondering whether I can do it at all.
Hi there,
I want to found some bad geometry for my ligand (sugar rings). The
procheck .out file seems only shows the bad bond length or angles for
protein. Is there any way we can get these information for sugar rings?
Thanks in advance!
Hailiang
Hi there,
I am trying to build the LINK information in PDB header for
sugar-containing protein, and I am wondering whether there is some utility
in CCP4 (or any others) can do it automatically (eg by measuring
inter-sugar distances). Thanks in advance!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi,
For some reasons, I need to use REFMAC5.2. But this version doesn't
include library for some ligand (eg NDG FUC MAN...). I don't have too much
clue as to how to manually build the library, and I tried to copy the cif
file from REFMAC5.6 into the current lib/data/monomers folder. However, it
Hi there:
I need a stand-alone excutable file of REFMAC of version 5.2. Just check
Garib's webpage but only has 5.4 and above available. Is there any way I
can get it? Thanks!
Hailiang
Hi,
I am running refmac on gp120(PDB 3FUS), and wondering whether there are
any dictionary files (.cif) that have already been built for the
polysaccharide (containing FUL BMA MAN NAG NDG, with NAG linked to ASN).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best Regards, Hailiang
.
Hailiiang
PS one other thought: in your run 2b you are not reading in (as TLSIN)
the TLSOUT file produced by run 2a. So run 2b is not starting from
the same point that it would have done as in run 1.
I.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Hailiang Zhang zhan...@umbc.edu wrote:
Hi,
I am using
Hi,
I am using REFMAC 5.2.0019 to run the following script:
***
refmac5 hklin a xyzin b eof
REFI TLSC ${CTLS}
REFI BREF OVERall
NCYC ${CC}
**
I thought this script will do CTLS cycles of TLS refinement followed by CC
cycles of verall B and geometry refinement. Then I did
Hi, there,
Is there any way refmac can output the mtzfile including mFo/DFc columes?
Thanks!
Hailiang
Thanks! Can you refer me some documents about your following statements:
derivation of sigmaa-weighted 2mFo-DFc formula is by calculating Fourier
coefficients of the following map:
Rescaled composite omit map, where minimal structural element (of the size
about the resolution element) is being
Seems 6.1.13 is the most recent version in CCP4 website...
6.1.2 or later.
-- Ian
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Hailiang Zhang zhan...@umbc.edu wrote:
Hi,
I remember the SIGMAA utility in some version of CCP4 can output DFC
colume in the mtz file. If somebody see this colume in you
Hi,
I want to calculate the sigmaa-weighted 2mFo-DFc composite omit map, and
tried the following 2 scripts:
(1)
./omit hklin ${f}.mtz mapout ${f}.map EOF
LABI FP=mFo FC=DFC PHI=PHIC
RESO 29.50 3.22
SCAL 2.0 -1.0
EOF
(2)
./omit hklin ${f}.mtz mapout ${f}.map EOF
LABI FP=FWT FC=FC PHI=PHIC
RESO
Hi there,
I am using the following script to calculate the composive omit map:
./omit hklin ${f}.mtz mapout ${f}.map EOF
LABI FP=FP FC=Fcalc.FC PHI=PHIC
RESO 29.50 3.22
SCAL 2.0 -1.0
EOF
Here FP is the experimental Fo, Fcal.FC/PHIC are calculated structure
factor/phase from the model.
My
Hi,
I remember the SIGMAA utility in some version of CCP4 can output DFC
colume in the mtz file. If somebody see this colume in you SIGMAA mtz
file, could you let me know which version CCP4 you are using? THanks!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi,
Is there anyway coot can color molecule backbone by diffrerent residue
ranges specified by user? Any other directions for doing this in VMD will
also be appreciated!
Hailiang
Hi,
I found there are many changes between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2. For
example, the key word REFI BREF OVER will result in totally different
results under these 2 versions. Based on my input PDB with anisotropic B
pre-refined, refmac_5.5 gave a much higher R/Rfree than refmac_5.2. Can
somebody
, Hailiang Zhang zhan...@umbc.edu
wrote:
Hi all:
I have a question about deciding an ideal Weight matrix value in
REFMAC.
When I change it from 0.1 to 0.001, the bond distance rmsd changes from
0.075 to 0.008, while the R changes from 0.26 to 0.33 (resolution
3.2A).
Now I am not sure what
Hi,
I generated a map using FFT, and tried to display it in O. By comparing
with coot, I found that the level in O seems to be the absolute electron
density instead of the sigma level. I am sorry I ask a question more
related to O: can O draw the map by a given sigma level instead of the
absolute
!).
Cheers, Tim
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 01:03:38PM -0400, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I generated a map using FFT, and tried to display it in O. By comparing
with coot, I found that the level in O seems to be the absolute
electron
density instead of the sigma level. I am sorry I ask
Hi,
If I have the model phase PHIC, exp Fo, and sigmaa-weighted FWT, is that
more reasonable to use Fo/PHIC or FWT/PHIC as the input of CCP4-DM?
Thanks!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi Kevin:
Thanks! Could you explain why the DM (NCS concerned) input should be
Fo/PHIC/WCMB instead of FWT/PHIC? I thought DM is just a real-space phase
improvement method, and the latter (FWT/PHIC) suffers less from model
bias...
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
If I have
Thanks for all the advices. The REFMAC PDB didn't provide ksol and bsol in
the author's refinement, otherwise I would fix them in my refinement.
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi Hailiang,
I want to reproduce the R factor provided by PDB file. The structure was
refined by REFMAC, and so I think if
Hi there:
The REFMAC manual give me a hard time to define the NCS during refinement.
Can anybody give a first time user a sample script based on the following
PDB header (NCS part only is ok, but please include how todefine tight
restrant only for both positional and B ref, for both NCS groups)?
-4894
Fax: +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/
On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi there:
The REFMAC manual give me a hard time to define the NCS during
refinement.
Can anybody give a first time user a sample script based on the
following
PDB header (NCS part
Hi there:
I want to reproduce the R factor provided by PDB file. The structure was
refined by REFMAC, and so I think if I try a REFMAC refinement based on
the pdb file and reflection data, the initial R factor given by REFMAC
should be it.
The pdb file provides residual B factors with TLS given
Hi,
I want to calculate the R factor based on the given Fo, Fc, and sigFo by a
mtz file. Can some CCP4 tools do this? Thanks!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Thanks a lot!
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I want to calculate the R factor based on the given Fo, Fc, and sigFo by
a
mtz file. Can some CCP4 tools do this? Thanks!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Yes- rstats
something like
rstats hklin sfall.mtz hklout rescaled.mtz eof-rstats
LABIN FP=FP
Hi,
I am reading a ccp4 mtz file using SFTOOLS. It asked me Is this an XPLOR
RFREE flag column?. First I assume the answer is NO, since the input is a
CCP4 mtz file although the colume is for free-flags. Then, I am wondering
what is the script to automatically answer NO in a shell script.
-02 02:00 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I am reading a ccp4 mtz file using SFTOOLS. It asked me Is this an
XPLOR
RFREE flag column?. First I assume the answer is NO, since the input is
a
CCP4 mtz file although the colume is for free-flags. Then, I am
wondering
what is the script
Hi,
I want to see how the mFo maps (NOT 2mFo-DFc) compare against Fo maps. In
the SIGMAA documentation, it says WCMB is the figure of merit; however, I
opened in coot with FP PHIC WCMB combination, and for lots of systems, I
didn't see too much difference against FP PHIC maps. Is the difference
Regards, Hailiang
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 13:15 -0400, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Is the difference
between mFo and Fo maps supposed to be very small?
For an essentially correct model, yes. The major advantage of (2mFo-DFc)
maps is suppression of model bias, so if you don't see much difference
then your
Hi,
Thanks for reminding me checking the mask. I think their might be
something wrong with the mask, since when DM read in the mask, it says:
Number of columns, rows, sections ... 84 74 69
Map mode 0
Hi,
I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a
fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions
of different NCS unit being averaged supposed to be the same? I found they
are different by checking FCDM/PHICDM, and maybe I am wrong somewhere...
-4742
Lab: +1-410-614-4894
Fax: +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/
On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:05 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a
fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions
Hi,
I want to refine B factors for several residues only (all the other B
factors and all coordinates fixed, I know it sounds weird but there is a
reason to try that). Is there anyway CCP4 can do this? Thanks for any
suggestions!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Thanks a lot Ethan, I will give it a try.
Best Regards, Hailiang
On Thursday 26 August 2010 11:56:39 am Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I want to refine B factors for several residues only (all the other B
factors and all coordinates fixed, I know it sounds weird but there is a
reason to try
Hi there:
As I understand, phenix.refine do real-space refinement locally (by
DiffMap), but from the documentation, I didn't find the keywords to
specify the residue range to be refined. Thanks for any help!
Best Regards, Hailiang
, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi there:
As I understand, phenix.refine do real-space refinement locally (by
DiffMap), but from the documentation, I didn't find the keywords to
specify the residue range to be refined. Thanks for any help!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi,
Can some utilities of CCP4 do the real-space refinement locally with the
residue range explicitly specified?
By the way, I have registered phenix bb. Just didn't realize this before,
sorry again.
Best Regards, Hailiang
for this.
Best Regards, Hailiang
Why you do not use coot? It does exactly what you want.
regards
Garib
On 25 Aug 2010, at 22:33, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
Can some utilities of CCP4 do the real-space refinement locally
with the
residue range explicitly specified?
By the way, I have
I mean the density of 2mFo-DFc or Fc maps.
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 03:13:53 pm Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi Garib:
Actually I tried coot real space refine zone, but the model seems not
sliding into the best density map (I also tried dragging it around, but
still not working fine). Then I
Hi there:
For a PDB with B values refined, if I modify/addto its local structure
(mutation, add 1 residue...), is there any way I can refine the B values
only for the modified/added structure while keeping already refined B
values unchanged?
Thanks!
Best Regards, Hailiang
about other programs.
Pavel.
On 8/15/10 10:35 AM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi there:
For a PDB with B values refined, if I modify/addto its local structure
(mutation, add 1 residue...), is there any way I can refine the B values
only for the modified/added structure while keeping already
Hi there:
When I generate the mtz file by SIGMAA, and want to view the 2mFo-DFc map
in coot, should I choose FWT PHIC WCMB combination or just FWT PHIC? I
think the later is more reasonable and I did see somebody the former as
well. Didn't see explicit instruction in SIGMAA document, and I
^^
so I would leave out WCMB.
Tim
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:33:11PM -0400, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi there:
When I generate the mtz file by SIGMAA, and want to view the 2mFo-DFc
map
in coot, should I choose FWT PHIC WCMB combination or just FWT PHIC?
I
think
Hi there,
Does phenix have any utilities which can do B-factor sharpening (with
user-specified Bsharp values) when calculating maps? Thanks!
Best Regards, Hailiang
specific questions:
http://www.phenix-online.org/
On 8/9/10 10:01 AM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi there,
Does phenix have any utilities which can do B-factor sharpening (with
user-specified Bsharp values) when calculating maps? Thanks!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi there,
I was using the CCP4-omit to generate the omit maps. However, for 2 input
mtz files with exactly the same colume labels but different system size,
for the small system, it works, but for the large systems, it ended up
with:
./omit: line 9: 8510 Segmentation fault
I am not sure
Hi,
I frequently find 3mFo-2DFc maps have been used for model building. I am
not sure whether they have less model bias than 2mFo-DFc maps, and I
appreciate for any references.
Best Regards, Hailiang
) showed that 2mFo-DFc is least model biased. The m and
D coefficients has to be computed using test reflections (Urzhumtsev et
al, 199?). To be precise, it is actually
2mFo-DFc for acentric reflections
and mFo for centric reflections
Pavel.
On 7/29/10 12:12 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi
Hi there,
I read the paper Detecting outliers in non-redundant diffraction data
(Read, Acta Cryst D55,1759), which described a program called OUTLIAR.
Can anbody tell me how to get this program? Seems hard to find it on the
web.
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi all:
Does CCP4 or Phenix provide any utilities which can summarize the data
statistics (particularly looking for the average Fo_sigma/Fo for each
resolution shell)? Truncate seems to be able to do that but didn't get the
desired answer. Any short script will be greatly appreciated!
Best
Dear Sacha:
Yes, I think Fourier synthesis at a finite resolution range will generate
some negative, or more generally imaginary values in real space (hope I am
right again:). For the imaginary values, I think the map should take the
amplitude of it (maybe I am wrong). Do they normally make the
Hi,
I am using the MStats utiliy in UPPSALA-mapman to compare the density
inside and outside of the mask of the model (basically my target is to
somehow quantify the level of noise outside the model mask). According to
the instructions, I need to do:
(1) MAPMAN re m1 in.map ccp4
Hi there:
I found that the grid values in the map file generated by CCP4-fft
generally has a mean value of ~0, and of course there will be lots of
negative values. This apparently is not the real physics, since the
electron density has to be positive everywhere (hope I am right). Can
somebody
Hi,
I want to calculate the portion of the noise density with respect to the
whole unit cell (assuming the model is good enough). I plan to first
calculate the integral density within the whole unit cell, then build a
atom mask around the molecule and calculate the integral density within
the
Hi there,
I was generating the atomic mask using ccpr-sfall, and generating real
maps using ccp4-fft, and then ccp4-overlap these maps to calculate the cc
values. However, ccp4-overlapmap frequently complaints that the
Fast,medium,slow axis do not match for these maps. Following are the
script I
Hi Ian:
There was an issue with the environment setup of my PBS script, which has
just been fixed and everything back to normal. Anyway, thanks a lot for
all the help!
Best Regards, Hailiang
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Hailiang Zhang zhan...@umbc.edu wrote:
Hi Tim:
Thanks a lot
Hi there:
I downloaded the binary files of UPPSALA-mapman and they run smoothly
under linux. However, when I write it into a shell script and run under
PBS queue, it cannot be excuated. A simple test turned out to be:
(1)
***
[Linux] ./lx_mapman -works
(2)
***
[Linux]source
, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi there:
I downloaded the binary files of UPPSALA-mapman and they run smoothly
under linux. However, when I write it into a shell script and run under
PBS queue, it cannot be excuated. A simple test turned out to be:
(1)
***
[Linux] ./lx_mapman -works
(2
Hi there,
I have ccp4 installed on my linux system, and I wonder whether I could
directly use the ccp4 commands (sigmaa, dm...) in my C/C++ code. I don't
need too advanced manipulation in ccp4 clipper, just the regular ccp4
commands. Thanks!
Hailiang
Hi there:
Is there any easy to convert a colume in mtz file (say fom) into a fixed
value? I tried to convert to ascii first, but mtz2various only takes 1
single FP colume (unfortunately I have 2). Thanks!
Hailiang
On 10-06-21 03:23 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi there:
Is there any easy to convert a colume in mtz file (say fom) into a fixed
value? I tried to convert to ascii first, but mtz2various only takes 1
single FP colume (unfortunately I have 2). Thanks!
Hailiang
Not sure why, but sometime when I run it, it says
Max nr of points in map :4194304,
some other times, it says
Max nr of points in map : 5000.
All the runs are on the same machine, and I hope the latter can happen
more frequently (unfortunately only occasionally:-(.
Dear Nat:
Fixed, and thanks a lot!
Hailiang
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Hailiang Zhang zhan...@umbc.edu wrote:
Not sure why, but sometime when I run it, it says
Max nr of points in map :4194304,
some other times, it says
Max nr of points in map : 5000.
All
Hi,
I wanted to do solvent flattening for my map using Wang's method. I used
CCP4-DM, and now have several questions:
1. DM seems requiring the FOM, so I generated FOM using SIGMAA by
providing FP, FC and SIFFP using the following:
sigmaa HKLIN in.mtz HKLOUT
Hi all:
Thanks for all kindly helps with real space CC. Now I have a new question
again. In the output of OVERLAPMAP in CCP4, there is a almost last line
saying Total...:
###
...
1243 0.9528 0.9249
1244 0.9741 0.8591
:
Number of columns, rows, sections ... 96 152 17
and not a section of your atomic model.
HTH
Martyn
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 23:51 -0400, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a real space correlation on a specif protein section
using
CCP4 OVERLAPMAP. I am using
you
will get a LOT of numbers. You dont say why you want this information,
but if it is to find the electron density at an atom site overlapmap
will do that if you ask for real space rfactor
eleanor
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to convert a binary ccp4 map file to a readable format so
the CC of the initial maps.
There is a belief that you need a CC of 0.5 to be able to build the
structure but different problems and different builders achieve
different results..
Eleanor
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a real space correlation on a specif protein section
using
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/dist/html/sfall.html#mode_atmmap_resmod
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Dear Eleanor:
Yes, this is something I want to do (RSR and CC). But I just want to do
the calculation based on a group of residues or atoms, and it seems
OVERLAPMAP doesn't do
Hi Pavel:
This is actually something I am doing right now. Yes, sometimes it is
always better to try it practically.
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi Hailiang,
On 5/25/10 8:14 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Have seen the real-space correlation used widely judging the map
quality.
Generally
and
others
have pointed out already.
RTFM:
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/dist/html/overlapmap.html#notes_mapin3
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/dist/html/sfall.html#mode_atmmap_resmod
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Dear Eleanor:
Yes, this is something I want to do (RSR and CC). But I
Hi,
I wanted to convert a binary ccp4 map file to a readable format so that I
can retrieve the electron density at each real space grid point. Just
tried MAPTONA4 and MAPEXCHANGE, but the resulting ascii file are not
readable, and I didn't find any documentataion about how to read them.
Could
Hi,
Have seen the real-space correlation used widely judging the map quality.
Generally or empirically, in order to say an map (area) has good
quality, how large should the real space correlation coefficient be? Say,
is 0.8 good enough on a residue base? Any references about this will be
greatly
Hi,
I am working on a real space correlation on a specif protein section using
CCP4 OVERLAPMAP. I am using the following scripts, not sure whether it is
good or not (didn't find in OVERLAPMAP documentation).
overlapmap \
mapin1 ${PDB}-1.map\
mapin2
Hi,
Phenix.model_vs_data offers a great function which prints out the sigma
level of the electron density at each residue or atom center. This is very
useful comparing the relative density between two maps at the given
region, however, it is running a little bit slow. I am just wondering
whether
!
Best Regards, Hailiang
If you already have your map, or if you can calculate the map in CCP4,
you can print out density at atoms using the Uppsala program MAPMAN,
function PEEK:
http://xray.bmc.uu.se/usf/mapman_man.html#S30
hth
Hailiang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
Phenix.model_vs_data offers
94 matches
Mail list logo