I found the following books very helpful when I started trying to tackle
this vast subject:
Object Technology: A Manager's Guide:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0201309947
(don't worry about the title, it is useful by anyone, not just managers)
Object-Oriented Thought Process:
Yep, this is correct. I just updated it slightly to confirm that it runs
with the latest version of Reactor from the SVN repository (revision 254).
regards,
Brian
On 5/15/06, Qasim Rasheed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe Brian Kotek has a version of Bookstore application using
Modelglue
I don't see any issue with having one set of core files, essentially making
your different stages part of a single large application. To get at the
second level of your app, (i.e. the admin area) just create a child
circuit for the stage and you can reference it like
Glad you found it useful Mike. I should note though that even that code was
written a year or two ago and I would do a a couple of things differently if
I wrote it today. Nothing too major though. One of these days I'll take some
time to update it. Maybe knowing that folks are still looking at it
Casey, I built it as an example of using both Fusebox 4.1 and using CFCs.
The CFC portion of the application is completely independent of the fact
that the UI controller layer is using Fusebox. In other words, the same CFCs
could be used in a Mach-II or Model-Glue frameworks (or no framework at
If you used THIS, some other bit of code could do:
cfset OutsideCFC.InsideCFC =
and completely overwrite the CFC at any time with no warning. Using a getter
method and a private instance variable prevents this.
On 1/8/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not quite the same,
If you mean can you write CFML code, save the file as .php, and have CF
execute it, then yes you can. If you mean can the CF server read and process
PHP code written in files with a .php extension, then the answer is of
course not.
On 11/23/05, Jim Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Is
Couple things Sandy, first shouldn't you have this:
cfset var local=structNew() /
(you're setting it to the string structnew()).
And second, try using just from arguments.recordset instead of from
#arguments.recordset#. Note that recordset could well be a reserved
work in QofQ so you might
We create a Config object that wraps up all these sorts of settings
(DSN name, table aliases, application settings, etc.) and then just
pass that Config object into whatever other CFCs need access to them.
On 9/18/05, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I SET some of the application variables in each
Holy Zarquon's singing fish! I absolutely LOVE it when people
completely miss the intent of the author, the footnote, and the point!
On 9/9/05, Ken Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy Zarquon's singing fish! I absolutely LOVE it when we get into these
discussions where the you should
(Original poster was making a Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy reference.)
On 9/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who the heck is Zarquon?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 11:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Fusebuilder (http://www.fusebuilder.net/) will make it easy to create
a wireframe, then a prototype from the wireframe, then architect the
app based on the prototype and generate fusedocs for you. It is well
worth $95 if you have a large project to build and will save you an
absurd amount of time.
No, you can't. CF only allows creation of Java, CFCs, web service, and
COM components. If you want to call a PHP class and get data back from
it, calling it as a web service is probably the best route.
On 9/5/05, Bram Plessers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assume I have a php class which acts kind a
No, you don't need to var scope your arguments. Unless you have some
reason for wanting to have a copy of the arguments you don't need to
worry about duplicating or var-scoping them.
As far as how CFC's behave for each user, as long as you are
var-scoping your local variables you will be fine.
You only need to lock to prevent race conditions. Since
application-scoped CFCs should nearly always be stateless (they have
no instance data, or the instance data does not change once the
component is initialized), locking isn't an issue.
On 9/2/05, Snake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about
CFCs are placed in the application
scope with state that changes all the time. The CFC could be a very busy
manager, and not just a stateless utility or something. It might be in the
application scope because you only want one, and no more.
On 9/2/05, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
No worries Paul, it's a valid thing to point out.
On 9/2/05, Paul Kenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry. You did say that, and I missed it. You are right.
On 9/2/05, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why I said nearly always. If you do end up needing an
application-scoped CFC
running the query wins, and then you start
getting weird errors under load. It's an easy thing to miss..
-Original Message-
From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 7:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFC's - Most efficient scope?
That's why I said
I wrote an article on CFC best practices that might be helpful:
http://www.briankotek.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=104F4985-3048-23C1-DDF6C15FB4864387
On 8/29/05, Dave Carabetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/29/05, Burns, John D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting ready to start a new
No, this is actually a bug in CFMX7 that involves using duplicate() on
certain variables when sandbox security is enabled. Until it is fixed
(Macromedia has already recognized the bug per Sean Corfield), you'll
have to make a small change to the core files to switch this:
application.fusebox =
The apps are being added to. The idea was to only change one thing
with each verison (normal, using CFCs, using OO, etc.).
In the meantime I have an OO CFC-based Fusebox 4.1 sample bookstore up
at www.briankotek.com/blog.
Regards,
Brian
On 8/25/05, wolf2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
There is a simple security plugin within the Let's Make a Deal sample
application in the download section at Fusebox.org http://Fusebox.org. I
believe it uses list-based security, but yes it is possible to modify the
plugin or write your own that will use the cflogin security framework.
I have a CFC based Fusebox bookstore sample app as well, at
www.briankotek.com/blog http://www.briankotek.com/blog. It's in the
sidebar.
On 8/17/05, John Beynon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try this,
http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2005/1/4/Lesson-6--looking-at-Fusebox-41
:)
jb.
Could NTLM authentication be enabled and he isn't aware of it?
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=ColdFusion_Documentationfile=0287.htm#2991147
It says A request that uses NTLM or Digest authentication. In this case,
the
We also use ANT to pull from the source code repository, perform some
processing, and move the code to the target server.
On 8/2/05, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use rsync for pushing of all my code. Usually called from 'ant'
tasks that I define and call from Eclipse. So I've
=Problem executing Amazon.com http://Amazon.comweb
service invocation. type=AMAZON:FAILURE ---
/cfcatch
/cftry
Brian Kotek wrote:
Cutter, I was trying that code already and I'm still getting the error
about
not being able to create a web services stub. Can you post an example of
exactly what
and it broke. Maybe
you can't make a 'heavy' request without it?
Cutter
Brian Kotek wrote:
Thanks...I'm wondering if this is the issue:
cfset variables.keywordrequestARRAY.tag = [ASSOCID]
I don't think I have an associd (associates id?)...are you passing this
in? Just for fun, if you
Cutter, I was trying that code already and I'm still getting the error about
not being able to create a web services stub. Can you post an example of
exactly what you are filling in for all the variables (except for your
developer key obviously) so that I can try to determine what's wrong?
You've got it that the permissions are part of the application-scoped memory
structure. So if you want to avoid that long variable call, you could write
a function like getPermissionsForFuseaction('circuitname',
'fuseactionname'). But I'm not sure why you'd want to look at this
permission
Cutter, can you post the code you're using (minus your Amazon developer key
obviously)? I removed the time out but I'm still getting could not create
stub for web service invocation). Thanks.
On 7/20/05, Cutter (CF-Talk) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I removed the timeout and received a
This is an old and annoying issue that is cause by CF trying to guess the
type of the data in the column. We've had to append a string character such
as a tilde to the data to foce everything to be a string, do the QofQ, and
then remove it before processing/display.
Hope that helps,
Brian
Cutter, just FYI I am pretty sure that when Amazon changed over to the new
web service API it broke the old web service request I was using in the
bookstore. I haven't had a chance to fiddle with the new API or update the
example yet. But if someone has a working example using the new API it
I also can't make it work with this (I don't have an associates id)
!--- Build Array for Amazon.com http://Amazon.com Query ---
cfset keywordrequestARRAY.devtag = 1Z5QCJ06Gand the rest of my amazon
web service user id.
cfset keywordrequestARRAY.asin = B4T6UZ
cfset
Hi Seth. At first look that seems like it would work. I got a little
confused with you creating a variable called user but instantiating a CFC
called login, but that would be easy enough to clarify.
When I've done this sort of thing, I've used the cflogin tag, which means
your LoginManager can
Maybe you could do a Breeze presentation on onTap some time in Sean's Breeze
room? I'm a Fusebox guy at heart, but am always interested in learning about
other frameworks (I like both Mach-II and Model-Glue). However, the example
you provided there just confused me...if anything it made it look
John, are you aware of a way to label a tree in Subversion? In VSS you can
apply a label to a whole project, and then if you need to you can deploy a
specific label, or roll back to a specific label. I can't find a similar
function in Subversion...I can see the history of individual files but
That is correct, assuming that you are dealing with one User object that is
compositing an Address object. Sean already explained using a gateway to
bring back multiple of users and their addresses together.
Assumign one User object, you could run one query to get the address for the
single
It would depend on what you are doing. If there is some obvious, known
difference between the addresses (work, home, whatever) then you might have
different methods (getWorkAddress() or getHomeAddress()) that return
individual Address instances. If they have an arbitrary number of houses
that
Well to answer the first question, no you wouldn't want to convert the query
into an array of objects for exactly the reason you stated: it is slow and
there really is no reason to do this. Yes in Java you'd do that but Java is
totally OO and much faster at this sort of thing. Basically, if
Well you can just set the model and view circuits to have access=internal
and no external users can call anything in them. Or you can elect to move
the entire application (controller, model, view, parsed and plugins) out of
the web root and just have your index.cfm file in the web root. In your
.osdelimiter);
This is used to locate the fusebox.xml files and others, notice it starts
with the web root, thus it looks like you must have all core files in your
webroot I think.
gabe
-Original Message-
From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27
has made
people's do not hire list, it is you.
On 4/25/05, Connie DeCinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remind me never to hire either of you clowns who have no concept of security
or reality.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 1:52
Bless you, Matt.
On 4/25/05, Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/25/05, Connie DeCinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh give me a break! What a crock!
Would you like some cheese with your whine?
I think that now that you're getting snotty I'll take a moment to
point out that this
As someone who hosts with Crystaltech and has never had any problems,
I think it's also important to point out that the problem being
discussed here is not Crystaltech's fault, this will affect every
single person who uses a shared server, regardless of who hosts it.
On 4/23/05, Cameron Childress
There might be some COM objects that you could use but you'll have to
search around to find out for sure.
On 4/21/05, Emmet McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got a project dumped on my that requires a lot of xml parsing on a
coldfusion 4 server. I know about activ's CFX_XMLParser. I've
Quick apology, I meant compound not compount!
On 4/18/05, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to combine expressions in xmlSearch()? I'm trying
to select all nodes except where a certain attribute matches a value
that I specify. I'm trying this:
xmlSearch( xmlObject
Does anyone know how to combine expressions in xmlSearch()? I'm trying
to select all nodes except where a certain attribute matches a value
that I specify. I'm trying this:
xmlSearch( xmlObject, '(/employees/employee) and not
(/employees/[EMAIL PROTECTED]inactive])' )
but I get the error:
Can
.
cheers,
barneyb
On 4/18/05, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to combine expressions in xmlSearch()? I'm trying
to select all nodes except where a certain attribute matches a value
that I specify. I'm trying this:
xmlSearch( xmlObject, '(/employees/employee
I don't think there is any way except to write a script (or use something
like Apache ANT) that you can run that will automatically refresh the
application-scoped CFCs after you update the code.
On Apr 5, 2005 11:29 AM, Douglas Knudsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, we have some apps that
Just a note that you can also always put cfcontent reset=true just
before you output your HTML content, and that will discard everything
in the output buffer and start from scratch. This is an easy way to
eliminate any whitespace that was generated before your content.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005
Barney if you would blog this and your experience with Tartan in
detail I bet you'd get a ton of traffic. (hint hint). :-D
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:34:58 -0800, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically just a single registry of all properties and top-level
objects in the application.
Yes. Just name it getQuery() or something.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:15:17 -0500, Michael T. Tangorre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cffunction name=query access=public returntype=query
output=No hint=Pass it auth_user argument: Returns LDAP
We wrote a custom unit test execution system that recursively reads
all the directories, finds all the unit test harnesses, executes each
one, and creates a report of all failures and successes. It even flags
files that don't have a unit test. The app also executes any CFUnit
test harnesses for
Check out the Macromedia CF coding guidelines and Mach-II development guide.
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/wtg/public/
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:09:04 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One common method is the domain name methodology.
So, for example, if you get Raymond's Blog CFC,
You'll probably get a better response if you ask this on the Fusebox
forums. But I believe that the XFA is meant to be a placeholder for
ONLY the fuseaction value itself (hence the name exit fuseaction):
a href=#self#?fuseaction=#xfa.submit#
Since it appears that you are using XFAs in a way
, but CFC's can't. It's
worded in a very poor way, but i'm guessing session vars is assumed
to only include non-object data.
cheers,
barneyb
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:07:34 -0500, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barney I haven't tried it, but are you saying that CFMX7 does *not*
allow
Barney I haven't tried it, but are you saying that CFMX7 does *not*
allow for replication of session-scoped CFC instances? Or are you
saying that it does? Thanks.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:24:37 -0800, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That won't work. I belive it'll error on the methods
It hasn't shipped yet, but should be very soon.
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:48:31 -0500, Damien McKenna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone here read the Discovering Fusebox 4.1 book yet? If so, how
does it compare to the FB 4.0 book? I'm interested to see if it has
expanded the detail, and
Yes, Jeff's books are available at http://www.cafepress.com/protonarts/250818
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:51:55 -0500, Michael T. Tangorre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the FB4.1 book hasn't shipped yet, what would be the recommended
choice for an
Does anyone happen to know if the new charts support things like
standard error bars with a bar graph?
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:27:04 -0400, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper
@ macromedia. com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the doc on the new Charting in CFMX7. Essentially, we ship and you
Isaac, that won't work because do tags are dealt with at parse time,
not at runtime.
You could do it like this so that you don't have to worry about
appending to the fuesaction or using the index.cfm file to figure out
what to do:
form action=index.cfm method=post
input type=hidden
The best resource is probably the CFCDev mailing list. In addition,
check out Sean's blog, his two development guides (CF and Mach-II), as
well as some of the Mach-II and Fusebox 4 sample applications.
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:29:44 -0600, Donna French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone point me
Sorry, CFCDev is at:
http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:42:40 -0500, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best resource is probably the CFCDev mailing list. In addition,
check out Sean's blog, his two development guides (CF and Mach-II), as
well as some of the Mach
I have a sample Fusebox 4 application at my web site
(http://www.briankotek.com) under the ColdFusion section. It uses CFCs
as the model and includes a basic shopping cart.
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:17:00 -0600, Donna French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I've read a couple tutorials and have only
Back to the idea of using instance variables vs. using getter methods
within the CFC, keep in mind that if the getter method returns an
instance variable that is an array, you're getting a pass-by-value
copy of the array and not a reference to the original array. This can
lead to some bizarre
Are you sure you aren't creating an endless loop by running something
in the prefuseaction that, when it runs, tries to run a prefuseaction
again, and again, etc?
Hope that helps. We use prefuseactions in many places so they do indeed work.
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:27:18 -0500, Troy Murray [EMAIL
I haven't had a chance to play with PLUM yet, but I play to try it out
soon. However, I did want to come out and thank Adam and David (and
anyone else who helped) for what is clearly a huge amount of effort.
It's easy for people to get worked up about the details of how it
works, or what
I'm not sure how many times it must be stated in this thread that
using a framework will not prevent a bad developer from writing bad
code any more than using an OO language like Java can prevent bad
code. If this application that you worked on made an inefficient
system that duplicates queries
That is so hilarious and I'm being serious not sarcastic at all.
Great input as always Alex.
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:39:46 -0500, Alex Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look, this is all very simple. The best frameworks/methodologies ranked
in order are:
1) Mach-II
2) JSF-CF (Java
If you're serious I'm sure numerous people would be interested in looking at it!
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:05:40 -0500, Alex Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damien McKenna wrote:
Care to provide links for some of those, namely JSF-CF, MVC-QT and
MX-XCEL? I couldn't find anything on Google
It might help to note that many of the same principles of OO
development with CFCs can be applied using Fusebox 4 as well as
Mach-II. People are starting to build fully abstracted object models
with CFCs. When they're built correctly, you can take that object
model and use it with Mach-II or
, ColdFusion Developers Journal
Blog - http://www.horwith.com
Brian Kotek wrote:
It might help to note that many of the same principles of OO
development with CFCs can be applied using Fusebox 4 as well as
Mach-II. People are starting to build fully abstracted object models
with CFCs
Naturally, as with any programming decision there is a tradeoff. In my
experience, unless you have a very specific performance requirement,
the benefits of a framework in terms of maintainability,
standardization, and team development outweigh the very small
performance hit.
That said, of course
Sorry for the duplicate post...the listserver scolded me for not
trimming previous replies so I thought the message hadn't gone
through.
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:15:55 -0500, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Naturally, as with any programming decision there is a tradeoff. In my
experience
That may be your opinion, but the stark reality is that
object-orientation has taken over the vast majority of the programming
world. In my opinion, not embracing this change is basically career
suicide.
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:49:30 -0500, Claude Schneegans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exact, and I
I'd call Fusebox a framework more than a methodology (FLiP is the
methodology commonly used to support Fusebox projects). And while the
framework code itself is not OO (where Mach-II is), you can easily
build CFC-based object models that fully follow OO principles and
leverage them in a Fusebox
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:34:16 -0500, Claude Schneegans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That may be your opinion,
No, it's my experience.
I'm assuming that your opinion is based on experience.
but the stark reality is that object-orientation has taken over the vast
majority of the programming
There are all sorts of bugs like this in query of queries. This is
because CFMX is assuming the data type of each column based on the
first value in the query. So if you have a field that has bunch of
strings in it, but one row has a numeric value in that column, even if
YOU want it to be
Of course I meant we avoid the use of Query of Queries, not cfquery. :-)
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:32:08 -0400, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are all sorts of bugs like this in query of queries. This is
because CFMX is assuming the data type of each column based on the
first value
If you log it it should show you the introspection information for the
CFC. The CFC Explorer is secured behind the CF Admin login so that
random outsiders can't see the guts of your CFCs.
Hope that helps,
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Dan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug
What are you talking about? If you're being serious, this doesn't make
any sense at all. If you're joking, it's not funny.
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:00:05 -0400
Subject: RE: BLACKSTONE: Software Development Times Article
To:
Why? They're all fine frameworks. No gasket-blowing in sight (unless
one considers your random irrational generalizations as blowing a
gasket).
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:53:19 -0400
Subject: RE: BLACKSTONE: Software
Uh, I don't recall making such a statement.Can one not simply ask
the question?
- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:37:22 -0400
Subject: RE: techspedition.com - Fusebox 4
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ever written a book, Aaron?
I had no
It's not an argument...why is it that simply asking the question
results in several people launching into accusations?One of the
reasons I rarely post on this list I suppose, a few too many folks
(actually, it's usually just the same few folks) just itching to start
arguments.
The point I was
it...it's a bit cryptic and leaves a lot of room for
interpretation (I read it exactly the way Dave read it).
Brian Kotek wrote:
Uh, I don't recall making such a statement.Can one not simply ask
the question?
- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004
Eric, I'll yell at Hal and John for letting the book sell out.I'd be
happy to send you one if you give me your name and address (just email
it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]).Maybe you could paypal me for the shipping
cost?
Also, Jeff Peters wrote a Fusebox 4 book which you can get here:
Ever written a book, Aaron?
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:03:36 -0500
Subject: Re: techspedition.com - Fusebox 4
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I am dismissing the tool, but that has a lot to do with the fact
I work at a place that
I think that MySQL would be a much more robust option than FoxPro.
You could also consider PostgreSQL, or if possible, Oracle.
- Original Message -
From: Sumito Hamdyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:45:17 -0400
Subject: ColdFusion default Client Variable Storage, how robust?
One option would be to set the originating circuit/fuseaction as a
session variable.Then once they log in, just redirect them based on
that?
- Original Message -
From: Anne Girardeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:24:42 -0400
Subject: Circuit Security in FB4 MVC
To: CF-Talk
It depends.But generally, small specialized CFCs will be easier to
maintain and reuse than large generalized ones.In OO terms, this is
called cohesion, and it's a Good Thing.It means an object has a
specific and well-defined purpose and isn't trying to do a lot of
unrelated things.
HTH,
Brian
Agreed, UML is excellent for this purpose.The day an IDE (maybe
He3?) can take my CFCs and automagically generate a UML diagram, or
take UML and generate CFC stubs, I'll be a very happy camper!
- Original Message -
From: Micha Schopman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:19:24
of the
chapters are available as well as all of the sample applications.I wrote a
non-MVC blog for the book which Brian Kotek then turned into MVC (he never
touched a fuse, just touched how they were called).If you download both,
you can get a good idea.
Sandy
It should also be noted that while OO is not *required* to do Fusebox,
you are by no means prevented from using OO techniques within a
Fusebox application.We have a very large Fusebox 4 app in a MVC
configuration.A large amount of the Model is written in CFCs with a
fully OO implementation.We have
I'm not sure about MySQL, but in Oracle you can do this easily,
assuming I am understanding correctly what you need, maybe a
similar solution is available for MySQL?
CFQUERY Name=GetDays Datasource=#DSN#
Select WS_WeekDay
from weeklyschedule
order by
case
when WS_WeekDay eq 'Sunday' then 1
haha...using CF too long.Replace the 'eq' with '=' please.
I'm not sure about MySQL, but in Oracle you can do this easily,
assuming I am understanding correctly what you need, maybe a
similar solution is available for MySQL?
CFQUERY Name=GetDays Datasource=#DSN#
Select WS_WeekDay
from
Yes, something is wrong, I am now getting individual emails in my inbox
which I explicitly set it not to do, and just started getting an hour
ago.
-Original Message-
From: Kunal Pewekar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:
Actually Philip, most folks in the Fusebox Community are extremely helpful and
courteous. If you ever have the need, feel free to post on any of the Fusebox forums
and I can promise you'll get many offers for help or insightful comments.
Regards,
Brian
Philip Arnold wrote:
You know, if a
Mosh, I think we're getting wrapped up too much in specifics. Let me back up for a
moment. First, XFA's are not required, only suggested. You can write an entire FB
app without a single XFA. They just offer some nice benefits, like:
keeping decisions about application flow in the realm of
Calvin, I could see how you might think that, but in reality, this is the list of
arcane terms that Fusebox brings with it:
Fuse - an individual, atomic code file in a Fusebox application.
Fuseaction - a request handler, usually responds by running fuses.
Circuit - a group of related
Mosh, you are probably the most even-headed person here. The observations you list
here are pretty accurrate. And thanks for the kudos, I really am just trying to help.
I really like Fusebox, but I do try hard not to be the zealot that some people think
all Fuseboxers are. Personally I
601 - 700 of 725 matches
Mail list logo
