On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Paul Hastings wrote:
On 1/31/2011 11:02 AM, denstar wrote:
It was based on a percent. So I guess the real number would be 170
out of a 1000. I think. 17%? I suck at math.
you said 17 out of 100 people who replied to that survey. that's a useless
sample
Thanks Michael, those were my initial thoughts on this as well. I'm
glad to see someone else is doing it successfully.
Just out of curiosity, are you doing this with any high traffic sites?
Or, do you have any cases where other people/sites/services are also
using your API?
Thanks,
Eric
Thanks Andy. I didn't realize that ColdBox had REST baked in, I'll have
to look in to that. I know that there's been some buzz lately about
REST with Mach-II as well, but I haven't had a chance to look into any
of it either.
Thanks,
Eric Cobb
ECAR Technologies, LLC
http://www.ecartech.com
Not high traffic, no. Yes the service is being consumed by a number of other
businesses. Not many, perhaps a few dozen.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Eric Cobb cft...@ecartech.com wrote:
Thanks Michael, those were my initial thoughts on this as well. I'm
glad to see someone else is
Has anyone run into an issue when uploading a file within a cflayout? After
submitting, I get a element is undefined in form. When I take my form out of
cflayout it works fine. Any ideas??
Thanks!
Tim
~|
Order the Adobe
When you have a form inside a cflayout, CF auto translates it to a
Ajax based form. You can't (*) to file uploads with Ajax-based forms.
* There are - of course - work arounds.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Tim Do t...@wng.com wrote:
Has anyone run into an issue when uploading a file
You can't upload a file via an ajax window. It's a browsr restriction as
far as I know. The trick is to embed a hidden iframe and do the file upload
there. Also, there's a handy jquery plugin which takes care of this:
http://jquery.malsup.com/form/
-Jake
Sent from my Droid
On Jan 31, 2011
I have this Cfloop over a query. In the loop I have 4 conditional statements
that basically call a template that generates an email if the condition is met.
Let's say condition 1 is met, is there a way to break the loop and go to the
next index and start at the beginning of the code?
use CFSWITCH instead of a sequence of CFIFs
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Adam Bourg adam.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have this Cfloop over a query. In the loop I have 4 conditional
statements that basically call a template that generates an email if the
condition is met.
Let's say
cfbreak /
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Adam Bourg adam.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have this Cfloop over a query. In the loop I have 4 conditional
statements that basically call a template that generates an email if the
condition is met.
Let's say condition 1 is met, is there a way to
I need to make a revision.
I have an if with a nested if.
How do I do it with this?
cfif LTE someCondition1
cfif GT someCondition2
!--- Code here ---
/cfif
/cfif
I have this Cfloop over a query. In the loop I have 4 conditional
statements that basically call a template that generates
Sorry, just read the rest of the comment. I got a little send happy.
Try cfcontinue /
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
cfbreak /
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Adam Bourg adam.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have this Cfloop over a query. In the loop I
cfif LTE someCondition1
cfif GT someCondition2
!--- Code here ---
cfcontinue /
/cfif
/cfif
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
I should add, this is CF9.
If you are using a version of CF that doesn't have cfcontinue you will have
to go about it a different way. If it's really just as simple as meeting the
two conditions to skip the current iteration you could just set a var.
pseudo:
var doContinue=false
if condition1
Hi all,
hoping for some advice with querying a query - at least I think that's what's a
good fit here but feel free to advise otherwise.
I've got a folder which contains 35,000 folders. I've also got a table with
lots of records, where the roomid column matches the name of one of the
Curious to see what everybody's favorite coldfusion host is also?
Hostek? CrystalTech? DailyRazor?
I've had really good service from Enterhost. The difference of course is that I
went the dedicated server, and a pumped-up one at that. I used to host with
Viux, and while their support
Um, did you try the where clause? You said it didn't work - how did it
not work? Can you show us the full code and the error?
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Stefan Richter
ste...@flashcomguru.com wrote:
Hi all,
hoping for some advice with querying a query - at least I think that's what's
Yes, QoQ will work here.
!--- get your folders ---
cfdirectory action=list name=roomList type=dir
directory=#roomsDir#
!--- get the rooms from the DB ---
cfquery datasource=#dsn# name=roomsDB
SELECT roomid
FROM rooms
/cfquery
cfoutput query=roomList
!--- loop through
I've got a folder which contains 35,000 folders.
Setting aside your QoQ question, you may have problems simply
traversing a folder with this many items in it.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small
KickAssVPS
Great support, very little down-time (occasional maintenance),
RDP (which is all I use) Win 2008, CF 8/9, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Muller [mailto:ad...@montaguema.net]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 12:47 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: favorite coldfusion host
+1,000,000 for Enterhost dedicated servers. I've been with them for many
years now. Every year or so I shop around just to keep them honest, and
every year or so I stay put. Why? They're unbeatable, both in service and
price. The best thing about their service? I rarely ever need them, and
Hi, I'm trying to create a input form that will only accept PDF's and images.
I've tried validateat=onsubmit, but haven't had any luck returning an error
to the user. Any suggestions?
Here's the code:
cfinput
type=file
required=no
name=cprAdultImage
value=
Hi, I'm trying to create a input form that will only accept PDF's and images.
accept=application/pdf,image/tiff,image/jpeg,image/x-png
The accept attribute is used on CFFILE when it's performing the
upload action on the target page, not within the CFINPUT tag itself.
CFFILE compares the
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Tim Do wrote:
An exception occurred when setting up mail server parameters. This
exception was caused by:
coldfusion.mail.MailSpooler$SpoolLockTimeoutException: A timeout occurred
while waiting for the lock on the mail spool directory..
We've been getting
Thanks.
Guess what I was trying to avoid was a loop with 35,000 queries... I was trying
to come up wit a clever way to do this in one SQL statement. One issue I
noticed is that QoQ does not to seem to (easily?) support joins.
Then again I'm no SQL ninja by any means.
S
On 31 Jan 2011, at
Thanks Dave,
listing the folders performs a lot better than I expected, so that's not my
issue here.
Cheers
Stefan
On 31 Jan 2011, at 17:57, Dave Watts wrote:
I've got a folder which contains 35,000 folders.
Setting aside your QoQ question, you may have problems simply
traversing
Any suggestions on a decent spell check engine? (Preferably one that
works for both English and Spanish.) Need one that runs entirely on
the server in a closed environment, or at the least has the server
making the API calls, not the client. Any ideas?
-Justin
Stefan,
This might work ... can't remember if the IN () function works in QoQ or
not.
!--- get a list of all the rooms from the DB (after you query) ---
cfset roomList = valueList(roomsDB.roomid) /
!--- now query to get folders that are not in the rooms DB list ---
cfquery dbtype=query
Jspell and ASpell is pretty popular/common spell check plugin.
or take a look at http://www.spellchecker.net/
http://www.spellchecker.net/
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Justin Scott leviat...@darktech.orgwrote:
Any suggestions on a decent spell check engine? (Preferably one that
works
I was trying something like this:
cfquery name=orphanRooms dbtype=query
select * from roomList
WHERE name = 'x'
cfloop query=roomsDBOR roomList.name = '#roomid#' /cfloop
/cfquery
I think I am getting somewhere with it. Anything inherently wrong with this?
Stefan
On 31 Jan 2011, at
Ah great, an interesting approach. Many thanks.
Stefan
On 31 Jan 2011, at 20:10, Jason Fisher wrote:
Stefan,
This might work ... can't remember if the IN () function works in QoQ or
not.
!--- get a list of all the rooms from the DB (after you query) ---
cfset roomList =
We use Jspell as well. I am happy with it over all. However, we needed to
have it check individual fields one at a time which the version we purchased
did not do out of the box. I remember it being a *bear* to get it to work in
that manner. I don't know if that is one of your requirements but I
Nope, nothing wrong with it. There may be a limit on the number of
statements in a QoQ WHERE clause, though I don't know. I know the old
Microsoft JET database engine used to have a logical limit of 40 statements
in the WHERE clause. Just something to note if it bombs on 30,000
statements
Denny,
I think you see the world as you would hope it to be, not for the reality
that it is. A commendable quality, but not one Adobe can choose to share
with so many CFML careers on the line. It's been 3 years since OpenBD/Railo
went open source and removed the price barrier to CFML adoption. 3
for all intensive purposes
Must.Resist.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
You want to know why I've been moving my projects from Adobe CF to
Railo, Adam? It's quite simple, really. Railo is a better product for
me. I've not had a very good experience with Adobe as a cfml developer
and I've had a much better experience with Railo as a cfml developer.
Yes, even with a
What are we actually debating, again? The original issue at the root of all
this was that Adobe is being abusive to the OSS engines. Highlighting the
competitive advantages that Adobe feels they have over Railo or OpenBD, or
the negative impact they feel it those engines have on the Adobe or CF
You have it exactly backwards, Brian. Adam accused the Open Source
cfml community of being abusive toward Adobe.
And I quote from Adam: The open CF side of the community couldn't
be more abusive
towards Adobe. It's laughable to think that the community holding the OS
vendors accountable would
The only abuse I've seen from
Adobehttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=For%20all%20intensive%20purposeswas
abuse of the English language.
/me runs
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Brian Kotek brian...@gmail.com wrote:
What are we actually debating, again? The original issue at the
I agree with you, who really cares what Adobe say about Railo or vice versa,
as you say this is normal competitive practice and any company need to prove
their product is the best and normal practice is to say our product does
this, theirs doesn't, so no-one is doing anything wrong there.
The
You have it exactly backwards, Brian. Adam accused the Open Source
cfml community of being abusive toward Adobe.
And I quote from Adam: The open CF side of the community couldn't
be more abusive
towards Adobe. It's laughable to think that the community holding the OS
vendors accountable
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Adrocknaphobia
adrocknapho...@gmail.com wrote:
So, 3 years later, our community for all intensive purposes seems to
be shrinking (we have more CF jobs than developers).
But didn't you hold up the Evans Data Corp analysis, as recently as
CFUnited 2010, to show
Thank you, Dave, I missed that bit. When I read Adam's post he wasn't
directly quoting another post so I had not connected his statement to
that of Russ'
Personally, I don't think that anyone has been terribly mean to anyone
else by historic tech debate standards. I did challenge Adam on his
Judah,
I'm not complaining, I'm stating the facts. I've been a CF developer since I
was 18. I married a CF developer and the best man at my wedding is a CF
developer. My intentions aren't to make Adobe rich, they are to ensure that
the thousands of people who built their career on CFML can
Sorry Medic, my brain says intents while my fingers type intensive. Spell
check fails me.
-Adam
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Medic hofme...@gmail.com wrote:
The only abuse I've seen from
Adobe
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=For%20all%20intensive%20purposes
was
abuse
Judah,
You can complain all you want about a small faction trying to recklessly
tear down the
community but that's bullshit.
All I did was explain what's at risk for CFML developers. You didn't argue
any of what I said other than to cal it bullshit. I'd say that's fairly
abusive.
-Adam
On
Finally my trolling pays off! Yes!
It's all in good fun Adrock.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Adrocknaphobia adrocknapho...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry Medic, my brain says intents while my fingers type intensive. Spell
check fails me.
-Adam
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Medic
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
You have it exactly backwards, Brian. Adam accused the Open Source
cfml community of being abusive toward Adobe.
Actually, Judah, I don't have it backwards. You do. That's why I'm pointing
this out and asking if
yes which got twisted into adobe being abusive and Russ having a dig at
Adobe's attitude to the community which I immediately pointed out to Adam
is not what it said. The comments about Adobe being abusive to the community
came from others replies.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Brian Kotek
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Brian Kotek brian...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
You have it exactly backwards, Brian. Adam accused the Open Source
cfml community of being abusive toward Adobe.
Actually, Judah, I don't have
Sean,
I'm confused about whether you disagree with what I've said, or are just
trying to redirect the conversation away from my question.
You openly admit that as Chief Technical Officer of Railo you are not paid.
So what's gone wrong? Surely you should be able to turn 2,500 - 3,000
downloads a
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Adrocknaphobia
adrocknapho...@gmail.com wrote:
Judah,
You can complain all you want about a small faction trying to recklessly
tear down the
community but that's bullshit.
All I did was explain what's at risk for CFML developers. You didn't argue
any of
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Adrocknaphobia
adrocknapho...@gmail.com wrote:
If you think we are in a better place, then please ignore me. Just please
don't get bent out of shape when Adobe recognizes Railo/OpenBD as a
direct competitor. I think Judah provided a perfect example of why
I do not monitor the OpenBD lists, so perhaps there is
something going on there that I am unaware of.
Judah,
I've been a subscriber to the Open BlueDragon list on Google groups since it
started. I do not recall any anyone being abusive or very hostile to Adobe on
it at any time. Mind you I'm
On 1/31/2011 3:05 PM, denstar wrote:
Yeah, but I worded it more to sound statistical-ish. Either way...
you worded it to make it sound better and that actually doesn't make it any
more
factual.
My overall point was that surely there's *some* non-zero number of
people trying/using
I officially nominate this thread as the least productive on cf-talk ever.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 7:58 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Anyone know anything about this new ColdFusion conference?
On Mon,
I officially nominate this thread as the least productive on cf-talk ever.
I'm sorry, Ben, but this one isn't even close. Are you forgetting all
the why isn't CF/CFB free threads? Or the is CF dying threads?
This one will need at least twenty more replies before it's even in
the same category.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Adrocknaphobia
adrocknapho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm confused about whether you disagree with what I've said, or are just
trying to redirect the conversation away from my question.
I was asking for confirmation / clarification on your position. I'll
try to be
Good point, I guess I blocked those from my memory.
Oh well, I guess I'll just have to ignore this pointless banter up for a few
more days before the thread makes it to the CF-Talk Rogues Gallery.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday,
Wait, is CF dying?
andy
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:b...@forta.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 8:15 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: Anyone know anything about this new ColdFusion conference?
Good point, I guess I blocked those from my memory.
Oh well, I guess I'll
Rather than ignore it... is it worth trying to steer in a more
productive direction? Can it be a productive discussion?
I've gone on record before as saying I don't think the existence of
the alternate engines spells the doom of Adobe ColdFusion. I may be
wrong, but lord I hope not. Adobe
Wow, Adobe is getting all bent out of shape because people are realising
that Railo updates their engine more frequently. And can be rest assured
that they aren't waiting for 2-3 years before a problem is fixed. Seems like
Adobe should be looking into what's wrong in their own backyard before
On 01/31/2011 06:27 PM, Charlie Griefer wrote:
Rather than ignore it... is it worth trying to steer in a more
productive direction? Can it be a productive discussion?
Agreed. Maybe we could address the other barriers to adoption that exist
now besides cost?
-Jordan
You forgot the link: http://instantrimshot.com/
http://instantrimshot.com/This thread reminds me of the movie Inception.
Multiple layers and some confused people. I think Donna fell into limbo.
It started out ok.
-Mike Chabot
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:24 PM, andy matthews
Charlie,
I'd love to have a productive discussion on this subject. And yes, I have
opinions on this one, I've shared them before and am happy to do so again.
And no, as much as I admire Adam's passion for ColdFusion (it's why I nudged
him into the role), I don't fully agree with his take on
Wow, Adobe is getting all bent out of shape because people are realising
that Railo updates their engine more frequently. And can be rest assured
that they aren't waiting for 2-3 years before a problem is fixed. Seems like
Adobe should be looking into what's wrong in their own backyard before
When conversations denigrate to emotional rants and accusations and
unsubstantiated sweeping generalizations, that's when I back away.
You're no fun any more.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small
Hi Adam!
I dream reality. We all do. Our perception of it is as powerful as
whatever it, in fact, is. :)
I proclaim CFML is worth sharing!.
What you see as fragmentation, I see as coalescentation.
What you see as an attempt to tear down, I see as an attempt to build up.
We'll have to put
Good question Dave, but I have cases where Adobe hasn't done any regression
testing as well. Especially when it came to the addition of adding the new
ExtJS stuff, and how much backward compatibility went out the window.
One should not have to spend 3 months rewriting parts of an Application
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
...
Now, I don't really have a dog in this fight - while I'm an Adobe
partner, and resell Adobe products, I simply haven't seen any impact
on that business from the open-source engines. But I haven't seen
anything I'd qualify as abuse coming
Ben - if you think there's a venue in which the discussion *could* be
had productively, I'd love to be a part of it, or at the very least,
do whatever I could to help make it happen. Just say the word.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ben Forta b...@forta.com wrote:
Charlie,
I'd love to
Why do you think it's absurd to think that open source engines will
bring more people?
Because it doesn't seem to have done so, so far. Because the niche in
which CF is popular doesn't seem to care that much about open source
or free. Because there are plenty of other open source engines in
First off, this portion of the discussion probably belongs on cf-community.
There is a whole 'nother portion that I, like Charlie, think should be
discussed technically (or constructively). I applaud the folks
doing so.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Paul Hastings wrote:
On 1/31/2011 3:05
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
I wonder what kind of regression testing Railo does before releasing
an update? That's not intended as a dig, but there are differences
between expectations for open-source software and commercial software,
between large
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
Why do you think it's absurd to think that open source engines will
bring more people?
Because it doesn't seem to have done so, so far. Because the niche in
which CF is popular doesn't seem to care that much about open source
or free.
On 2/1/2011 12:46 PM, denstar wrote:
First off, this portion of the discussion probably belongs on cf-community.
then move it there.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Hi all,
I was just wondering if the Atlanta CF Users Group was still active. I still
see the site up but no monthly meeting scheduled. Thanks in advance for any
help!
MIke
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
77 matches
Mail list logo
