Well if they are not using any client, application or session vars or any
of the other features then I guess they do not need one.
In which case a non unique app name is not really needed either as there is
nothing in the application of any interest to anyone.
Altho a site that simple usually
I would assume the specific issues would be the crux of the matter. Without
them, it is difficult to speculate.
In regards to performance, the scopes you mention are often used to
increase performance in well designed applications. If the server doesn't
have enough resources to accommodate their
Your admins might be referring to the idea that some OTHER application.cfm/c
is being called when none is in the root of the site. These are issues that
can generally be resolved but they have to be understood. I'd get more info.
-Original Message-
From: Byron Mann
They got back to me, I think I pretty much shot down their theories.
1- Application scopes are still present without an application.cf* file and
shared across all sites with no app file
2- Garbage Collection performs better when applications are defined
3- Poor structure which leads to more
The question to ponder here is what an *empty* default Application.cfc file
is going to achieve? Not much, I believe.
You can set per application mappings in an Application.cf* file, (from CF9
I think?) which is *very* helpful on shared hosting, but an empty
Application.cfc file isn't going to
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Nando d.na...@gmail.com wrote:
The question to ponder here is what an *empty* default Application.cfc file
is going to achieve? Not much, I believe.
I've totally ignored the whole rest of the thread, so pardon me if this is
dumb. But an empty App.cfc
*On CF10, application and session scope seem to work without an
Application.cf* file in a parent directory*
I haven't been able to produce that. I can set session and application
variables, but it's not really a session or application, just a simple
structure. Example below the timestamps keep
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Byron Mann wrote:
Our admins are telling me that we run into issues with customers on our
shared platform not having one. (they didn't specify the issues in the
email).
It has been a while since I last set up a server for shared hosting, but I
used to put an
That is an excellent suggestion. I think we could probably do this for new
servers going forward.
Thanks
~Byron
Byron Mann
Lead Engineer Architect
HostMySite.com
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jochem van Dieten joch...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Byron Mann wrote:
I'm pretty sure it's living and dying by the request.
In application.cfm:
cfset x = 1
...is:
cfset variables.x = 1
...and not:
cfset application.x = 1
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Scott Stewart webmas...@sstwebworks.comwrote:
Yeah, it said Application.cfm...
I'm working on a
Yeah, it said Application.cfm...
I'm working on a legacy app, (on CF 9) that uses an Application.cfm,
which I cant rebuild right now.
inside of the file, there is a custom structure set called CFA., it's
part of a home grown framework.
Would it automatically be dropped into the
Thats what cfthrow and cfrethrow are for.
No.
This is to trigger an execution error in the system.
This kind of errors are not to be reported to the user.
If all you want is to warn the user he has done something wrong, you just need
to display some message in the returned page and that's
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2011 11:02 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Pfft, never ever heard that you display then use cfabort. Sorry but you not
going to ever convince me that cfabort is a good thing in any way shape or
form, except for debugging purposes. I can show you many ways to rewrite it
and be more efficient without using cfabort.
If you want to stop
template again. Enough said..
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 12:52 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Pfft, never ever heard that you display then use
,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 12:52 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Pfft, never ever heard that you display then use cfabort. Sorry but
you not going
What does efficiency have to do with it?
You tell me:
I can show you many ways to rewrite it and be more efficient without
using cfabort.
You will not change my mind on the use of cfabort, pure and simple.
I'm not really interested in changing your mind. I am interested in
disagreeing with
your HTML will not get rendered correctly if
you simply abort a page, which may result in your friendly error message not
being displayed properly, if at all.
Yet another grtuitous statement...
Your HTML will not get rendered correctly if you do not write it correctly,
period. ;-)
Ex: do not
incorrect blanket statements
I think this is exactly what I was looking for when I wrote gratuitous
statement, I hope this is correct too ;-)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
If your not going to cfabort until after the final HTML tag, than doesn't
that rather defeat the point.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:26 PM, wrote:
incorrect blanket statements
I think this is exactly what I was looking for when I wrote gratuitous
statement, I hope this is correct too ;-)
and then rewrite
the code again later when you requirements change?
Have a think about that.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 1:04 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Yes
No Dave, I look at what the next developer or I might be doing in 6-12months
time. I think that people should look at the problem at hand now and the
future, and foresee maybe things might change. Would it no be better to
write something properly now, rather than scratch your head and then
it
work right, well it did then but not anymore. And that just makes my point
even stronger.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 1:44 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re
Or you may simply not want to waste time processing code that's
unnecessary for a specific request.
... and you might even use no onRequestEnd at all ;-)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Actually cfabort was introduced as a debugging tag.
Really?
Note that I use CFABORT because I was not sure CFCONTENT will cause processing
to stop.
It is not specified in the docs, but it does, so I could remove the CFABORT tag
after CFCONTENT
There is still a good reason for CFABORT: stop
June 2011 11:06 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Actually cfabort was introduced as a debugging tag.
Really?
Note that I use CFABORT because I was not sure CFCONTENT will cause
processing to stop.
It is not specified in the docs, but it does, so I could remove the
CFABORT
Yes you did but I also asked for the PDF in question so that I could run
some tests as well, maybe you missed that:-)
I didn't miss it. The content of the pdf has absolutely no interest.
I told you it hapened to contain somewhere a string cf, the rest making an
invalid CF tag.
This is enough
The alternative, though, would be
for the executing process to run your first program before compiling
the second, which sounds like it would be generally an inefficient
thing to do - the more times control has to be passed from one process
to another, the longer things generally take. And
I did Claude (But I stated a possible bug), because I still am struggling
because you don't share the code, to how you are including or loading the
PDF. In other words I think there is a solution but I would need to see the
code and the offending PDF to help further.
No, he did post all the
1) Why are you using application/octet-stream instead of the PDF one? Are
you going to be using other file types here?
My guess is that his application doesn't keep track of the MIME types
for individual files.
2) Why do you have cfabort in your code, this screams bad coding. Cfabort
means
/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 1:39 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
I did Claude (But I stated a possible bug), because I still am
struggling because you don't share the code, to how you are including
: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 1:40 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
2) Why do you have cfabort in your code, this screams bad coding.
Cfabort means that you no longer want ColdFusion to continue on any
more processing.
Personally I would
I strongly believe that if
you are using cfcontent to deliver a file with the extension of PDF then it
*SHOULD* not compile that file, only the template it is being called from.
What you don't understand is that the file somefile.pdf.cfm
IS the actual somefile.pdf file simply renamed
just weird seeing cfabort rather than cfexit
method=exittemplate / which is better as you know that the application
will eventually fall down to onRequestEnd.cfm were as cfabort will not.
When you use CFCONTENT to deliver content, there is nothing else needed to be
done, except terminate the
The part that I am struggling with is the actual PDF itself, regardless of
whether it is called via a cfml template or not. I strongly believe that if
you are using cfcontent to deliver a file with the extension of PDF then it
*SHOULD* not compile that file, only the template it is being
No there isn't, just weird seeing cfabort rather than cfexit
method=exittemplate / which is better as you know that the application
will eventually fall down to onRequestEnd.cfm were as cfabort will not.
In many cases you might not want onRequestEnd.cfm to execute.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf
[mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 1:39 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
I did Claude (But I stated a possible bug), because I still am
struggling because you don't share the code, to how you are including
or loading the PDF. In other words I think
Actually I can't think of one.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 2:42 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
No there isn't, just weird seeing cfabort rather than
: Monday, 27 June 2011 2:27 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
just weird seeing cfabort rather than cfexit method=exittemplate /
which is better as you know that the application will eventually fall down
to
onRequestEnd.cfm were as cfabort will not.
When you use CFCONTENT
://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2011 5:45 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Andew, it has been said several times that the problem was caused by a
user
link to the file directly, it is not caused
Actually I can't think of one.
Well, I can think of a couple offhand. For example, you might have
some code that generates HTML output in onRequestEnd.cfm, and you
might have some scripts that generate something other than HTML. Or
you may simply not want to waste time processing code that's
Actually cfabort was introduced as a debugging tag.
No, it wasn't. It was introduced to allow the programmer to halt the
current program. While it can be useful for debugging, it's not
specific to debugging. I'm pretty sure that CFABORT has been around
since the very beginning of CFML.
Dave
In Claude's original question, it doesn't appear he's using CFCONTENT:
Yes I am.
Here is a summary of the code in application.cfm:
You can see that the requested file is never executed nor intended to.
The only purpose of the .cfm extension is to force the execution of the
My guess is that the compiler takes lots of extra time and resources, so it
does all its work before getting into the execution process.
May be, however it will also compile some files for nothing, ie: included
files actually not included at execution... which represents an extra
Until we see the code that delivers the PDF, you have to look at what is
causing the compile error. It has nothing to do with when one is compiled or
not, or what order it is compiled in. ColdFusion will always compile
application.cfm/application.cfc and then the template you are trying to
hasn't this all been said several times already ?
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
Until we see the code that delivers the PDF, you have to look at what is
causing the compile error. It has nothing to do with when one is compiled
or
not, or what
hasn't this all been said several times already ?
It doesn't appear to have been said simply and clearly, no.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
GSA Schedule, and provides the
CF will attempt to compile it.
My assumption was it was not compiled if not executed, but from my very first
post I know it is not the case.
My question was is it possible to get around this.
I got about 50 answers to explain what I already knew, but none to my question.
So I conclude that
My assumption was it was not compiled if not executed, but from my very first
post I know it is not the case.
My question was is it possible to get around this.
I got about 50 answers to explain what I already knew, but none to my
question.
So I conclude that there is probably no way to
://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Sunday, 26 June 2011 9:19 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
CF
No.
Happy now?
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 26 June 2011 07:19, wrote:
My question was is it possible to get around this.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
because you don't share the code
I did sent all the code, you probably missed it.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
Yes you did but I also asked for the PDF in question so that I could run
some tests as well, maybe you missed that:-)
Anyway I have a couple of questions.
1) Why are you using application/octet-stream instead of the PDF one? Are
you going to be using other file types here?
2) Why do you have
CF should not be compiling anything that is not CFML, if it is this actually
happening then it sounds like a bug in CF.
If you give a file a .cfm extension and invoke that file in an HTTP
request on a server configured to run CF, for all intents and purposes
that file is CFML, whether it
...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 4:56 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
CF should not be compiling anything that is not CFML, if it is this
actually happening then it sounds like a bug in CF.
If you give a file a .cfm extension and invoke that file in an HTTP
request
Dave, I realise that. In this case he is claiming to use cfcontent, any
content that is used in this manner should not be compiled into the CFML
template.
That was my point.
In Claude's original question, it doesn't appear he's using CFCONTENT:
I've noticed that application.cfm is indeed
I think he admitted to it a bit later.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 6:26 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Dave, I realise that. In this case he
mean secured login via an admin
panel to edit ths?
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 5:15 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
It is pretty simple
Here's how I would approach this. First, if you are dead set on having
the link to the pdf appear as a regular 'pdf' link, create a url
rewrite rule (using either mod_rewrite in Apache, an IIS isapi
extension for IIS, or another mechanism if you are using some other
webserver). The mod_rewrite
In Claude's original question, it doesn't appear he's using CFCONTENT:
Yes I am.
Here is a summary of the code in application.cfm:
You can see that the requested file is never executed nor intended to.
The only purpose of the .cfm extension is to force the execution of the
application.cfm
?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 11:04 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
In Claude's original question, it doesn't appear he's using CFCONTENT:
Yes I am.
Here is a summary of the code in application.cfm:
You can see that the requested file is never
You keep talking about templates being compiled, if there is an error as you
have mentioned this will stop the compile of the template and it will look
like it is being complied before the other.
This is what happens indeed. There a compile error because the pdf file happens
to contain some
...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 11:29 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
You keep talking about templates being compiled, if there is an error
as
you have mentioned
I will ask another question, is this application.cfm in the directory of the
template in question,
Yes, of course, and it include higher lever application.cfm
But you really need to work out why it is trying to compile the PDF as a
CFML template,
Again, since application.cfm is to be
Now if you are 100% confident that your PDF is being delivered by the
cfcontent tag, then it sounds like you may have come across a bug.
No, the pdf is not delivered in case of an error, since it is a compile error,
no code is executed.
For years I've been using this trick, and no file even
This is the first time it happens in about 10 years I've bee using this
method.
I thought the template would never be compiled because of CFABORT in
application.cfm, now I see it is not the case.
Since the problem has happened once in 10 years, I would try to open the PDF in
Acrobat Pro
?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 11:41 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
I will ask another question, is this application.cfm in the directory
of the
template in question,
Yes, of course, and it include higher lever application.cfm
But you really need to work out why it is trying
?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 11:41 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
I will ask another question, is this application.cfm in the directory
of the
template in question,
Yes, of course, and it include higher lever application.cfm
But you really
://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 11:50 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
Now if you
I think you don't understand,
I think you don't understand that I perfectly understand what's hapening:
Although I assumed the template (pdf file) should not be compiled since never
executed,
it IS compiled. This causes the syntax error and stops execution.
You are not taking into
I believe you are correct that the answer is no and that process seems
perfectly logical and correct.
Here is how I see the process running... By the way this is not actual
knowledge of the process, but how I've always assumed that the process occurred.
1) Request is received by web server
My guess is that the compiler takes lots of extra time and resources, so it
does all its work before getting into the execution process.
May be, however it will also compile some files for nothing, ie: included files
actually not included at execution... which represents an extra overhead.
wow this has dragged on a bit.
I think perhaps the point is being missed, so let me have a go for you.
The pdf file is never normally executed, so therefore you believe it should
never be compiled either, which is a correct assumption if you are just
delivering the file with with CFCONTENT, as
The CFML must be compiled in order for Java to execute it
You can however stop the class file being generated so that it is compiled
to memory only.
In the CFADMIN under caching settings - *Save class files*
Russ
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that
First, I will say that this is a strange request, and chances are, you're
doing something wrong. Compile errors mean that there was more than an
error, it's that the template has serious problems that the CFML compiler
couldn't parse. The fact that you still want one page to execute and another
The CFML must be compiled in order for Java to execute it
Sure, but actually I don't want to execute the file, nor compile it.
Yhe file is actually a pdf file under .cfm extension.
This is to force execution of an application.cfm first in which I check if the
user is authorized to open the
Do you mind me asking what need would require this? I am struggling to even
think of one.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?=
I can't think of a logical case for
this, and would love to hear it if you have one.
Please see my othe reply.
When an administrator uploads some document ie: myDoc.pdf, it is stored as
myDoc.pdf.cfm
When a user tries to open directly myDoc.pdf.cfm in the url, the document is
protected by
A better way to achieve what you want is to password protect certain folders
on your site so that the files cannot be access until a user has logged in.
Using CF to do this only works to secure cfm files, so if you want to secure
PDF's and the likes then simply use .htaccess files instead. This
/
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com [mailto:=?ISO-
8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 1:12 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
The CFML must be compiled in order
But I am at a loss to explain how a PDF is going to throw a CF Exception
error, when using cfcontent to deliver the file it should not be trying to
compile that content.
The error is not thrown using cfcontent, but simply when CF compiles the file
when the HTTP request is received, before even
A better way to achieve what you want is to password protect certain folders
on your site
I never use authentication on the server.
Only through CF, since the administrators of my CMS can add/edit their own
users, sometime 1000s of members.
=3E?=]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:41 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
But I am at a loss to explain how a PDF is going to throw a CF Exception
error, when using cfcontent to deliver the file it should not be trying to
compile that content.
The error is not thrown using
store your pdf files outside of web root so they are not directly
accessible.
serve them via an intermediary .cfm page, passing it the name of the pdf
file, which checks user's access rights to requested pdf and serves the
file or shows an error.
Azadi
On 22/06/2011 22:33 ,
The admin can still edit users, even 1000's
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:43 PM, wrote:
A better way to achieve what you want is to password protect certain
folders
on your site
I never use authentication on the server.
Only through CF, since the administrators of my CMS can add/edit
Hi Claude,
I agree to both Steven and Azadi's solution.
Sorry Claude, but yes, you will have to rewrite your system. The
trick you are using is a security risk. Someone can rename a CFM file
to a PDF file and upload it. Now that CFM code can be executed on the
server.
It shouldn't be
The admin can still edit users, even 1000's
Which admin? Window's or CF?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
I agree to both Steven and Azadi's solution.
Of course I know this solution. I thought I had a simpler one.
Someone can rename a CFM file
to a PDF file and upload it. Now that CFM code can be executed on the
server.
No way. Even if the pseudo pdf file actually contains CFML code, it cannot
the admin of your CMS
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:48 PM, wrote:
The admin can still edit users, even 1000's
Which admin? Window's or CF?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
the admin of your CMS
Of course, this is the way it works, but you were talking about password
protect certain folders.
I don't see how this can be done by CF code when files other than .cfm or .cfc
are requested by HTTP and the CF server is not even invoked.
It is pretty simple.
use CFFILE to read the .htaccess file
add a new user
use CFFILE to write the .htaccess file
User logs in, when he is authenticated, his credentials are available in the
CGI scope for you to use via CFML.
As I said, on Apache this is native, on IIS you can use Helicon APE
=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?= =?ISO-8859-
1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 1:41 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
But I am at a loss to explain how a PDF is going to throw a CF
Exception
error, when using cfcontent to deliver the file it should not be trying
June 2011 5:09 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm
the admin of your CMS
Of course, this is the way it works, but you were talking about password
protect certain folders.
I don't see how this can be done by CF code when files other than .cfm or
.cfc
are requested by HTTP
Would that not be another risk, or do you mean secured login via an admin
panel to edit ths?
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2011 5:15 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re
On 31/12/2010 9:55 PM, Richard Steele wrote:
I'm testing some error checking stuff and don't understand why the
application.cfm doesn't abort before an error is found in a file.
Here's the application.cfm
cfabort
Here's the index.cfm
cftest
When the index.cfm is run, it shows the
The error you have there is a *compile time* *syntax* error, the code will
be compiled before the request is 'run' which is why you see the error. If
you change the code in index.cfm to cfset variable = undefinedVar /, the
code will compile fine and will then abort in your app.cfm as the error
I would take your UDF's, put them into their own utility CFC, and load
the CFC into the APPLICATION scope during onApplicationStart(). If you
ever need to reload the CFC, you could always rerun your
onApplicationStart() method.
Steve Cutter Blades
Adobe Certified Professional
Advanced
Coldfusion will look for an application.cfm at the current folder
level and carry on up the directory tree until it finds one.
The first that it finds will override any further up the tree
On 11/9/06, John Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more newb question while I am at it. Does CF load
On 11/9/06, RichL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coldfusion will look for an application.cfm at the current folder
level and carry on up the directory tree until it finds one.
The first that it finds will override any further up the tree
Thanks, I understand that part. What I don't understand
]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: application.cfm question
On 11/9/06, RichL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coldfusion will look for an application.cfm at the current folder
level and carry on up the directory tree until it finds one.
The first that it finds
1 - 100 of 432 matches
Mail list logo
