[c-nsp] GBIC in 3524XL

May 14 22:50:08: %GBIC_SECURITY-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC interface Gi0/1 has bad crc And the port is shutdown. Ideas? Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5)WC17, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2007 by cisco Systems,

Re: [c-nsp] GBIC in 3524XL

Zafar Khan wrote: Hi Joe, %GBIC_SECURITY-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC interface [chars] has bad crc. Thanks. Yeah I saw that already. Joe ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Reasons *not* terminate PPPoE on 7500

Kurt Bales wrote: Hey Guys, What I would like is a somewhat clear and medium-detailed reason to give the bosses as to why they should be buying 7200's when we already have a 7500 here. Oh... And my current answer of Just trust me! didn't cut it last time ;) While its definitely a valid

Re: [c-nsp] Reasons *not* terminate PPPoE on 7500

Rodney Dunn wrote: There is an advantage to doing what 90+% of our other customers do. You are less likely to hit bugs someone else already hit and we are fixed. The 90% rule. 90% of bugs are found by people doing what 90% dont. ___

Re: [c-nsp] How to connect two VRFs on the same router? (without a loop-cable)

Gunther Stammwitz wrote: Hello colleagues, I've built two vrfs on the same router and have attached interfaces to them and everything is fine so far. Now I'd like to router from one vrf to the other one. The only way how this can be achieved seems to me to use two interfaces on the

Re: [c-nsp] T1 to Ethernet Tunnel

Robert Blayzor wrote: Joe Maimon wrote: Frame-Relay to Ethernet interworking is available in 12.411T IIRC. What about HDLC or PPP? This will not be a frame T1. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide09186a00801b2407.html If you can use ppp

Re: [c-nsp] T1 to Ethernet Tunnel

Frame-Relay to Ethernet interworking is available in 12.411T IIRC. Robert Blayzor wrote: I have a unique situation where a customer needs a point-to-point link. However the media on both ends is not the same. On one end we have can only do T1, on the other side, Ethernet. As the

Re: [c-nsp] Replacing a 2611 with PIX 515E + PIX 7.2

Perhaps you should see if you can get your hands on an AIM-VPN for the 2611. Save you a lot of trouble. Silly Questions wrote: Hi, Thanks for the reply - I should have been more clear. I don't have a 2821, I only have a PIX 515E with 7.2 code on it. The PIX doesn't support GRE so I have to

Re: [c-nsp] NAT on one interface

nat on a stick http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094430.shtml Church, Charles wrote: Yeah, it's possible to policy route the traffic to a loopback that has nat inside configured on it, and then out the normal interface. It's kludgy, but it'll work,

Re: [c-nsp] DSL router recommendation

Dont get any model with builtin dsl/atm. Get the ethernet ones only. Your provider can provide the dsl/atm modem/bridge. Much more flexible and likely to be more reliable, since the key part is that the dsl/atm/bridge device work correctly with the service. Joseph Jackson wrote: Hey all,

Re: [c-nsp] DSL router recommendation

Turn it into a bridge device, factory default. Get the pppoe username and password from verizon firts. Church, Charles wrote: Yeah, I agree with that. My father in upstate NY has DSL from Verizon, and they provide a Westell device that acts as a DHCP server and does NAT/PAT, much like a

[c-nsp] CBAC unsupported on the 7500's

So after over a year of issues with ACL's/CBAC I get the word. CBAC is unsupported on 7500 series However, a google search of CBAC 7500 turns up: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps359/prod_brochure09186a00800886e4.html This isnt very funny. Is it only the 7500 platform which

Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1, compact flash

Yes. I expect you could use much larger sizes without any issue as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is it possible to use a 512MB compact flash on a NPE-G1 ? Cisco CFs for NPE-G1 are listed as 64,128 and 256MB. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] mpls on one interface carried over an l2tpv3 on another interface

Suppose I have a 7500 router with two fastethernets plugged into the same switch. 12.4 Mainline. On fa0/0/0.2 I run mpls. on Fa0/1/0.2 I run l2tpv3 xconnect to another identicaly setup router in another location. (Yes, this is a workaround to an outage) The l2tpv3 is up, BGP vpnv4 routes are

Re: [c-nsp] mpls on one interface carried over an l2tpv3 on another interface

Gert Doering wrote: So if I understand this correctly, you need the L2TPv3 tunnel to build a virtual ethernet between two 7500s, that can then be used to tunnel MPLS across it, from two other interfaces on the same set of routers? You understand correctly. 7500 fa0/0 -(spit out

Re: [c-nsp] ASA 5505 or Netscreen 5GT - maturity?

If you are happy and comfortable with the netscreen's, odds are you will be very unhappy with the asa/pix and they wont make much sense to you either. (Is there anyone to whom the pix makes architechtural sense?) jacob c wrote: I appreciate all the responses. It is actually politics that is

Re: [c-nsp] default route behavoir

Matlock, Kenneth L wrote: now, keep in mind that the switch will only determine that 10.50.6.2 is down if the interface that 10.50.6.2 is connected changes state to down. If the state doesn't change, that route's still valid even if 10.50.6.2 is no longer responding. To avoid recursive

[c-nsp] command to peg interface up

All, Can anyone tell me what the config command to peg an interface as up even though its line down? I seem to recall seeing this just days ago. Thanks, Joe ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] command to peg interface up

yes. so unintuitive. Luan Nguyen wrote: just do a no keepalive :) -lmn On Jan 24, 2008 1:44 PM, Joe Maimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Can anyone tell me what the config command to peg an interface as up even though its line down? I

[c-nsp] l3 gateway redundancy without eating three ip addresses in the subnet

Is there a supported cisco method to provide gateway redundancy (hsrp, vrrp) without having to use three ip addresses from the same subnet? slb? Thanks, Joe ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] 7200 vxr as analog dialup access server with PRI

Is there any way to get the vxr to support analog dialup access using pri t1's? the group-range command doesnt seem to work on int group-async0 Thanks, Joe ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] 7200 vxr as analog dialup access server with PRI

Adrian Chadd wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2008, Joe Maimon wrote: Is there any way to get the vxr to support analog dialup access using pri t1's? IIRC, If there's no DSPs there's no analog dialup. What about the MIX port adapters? ___ cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] MLPPP product from the provider point of view

Hey all, Thought I would ping the list and try to benefit from the collective experience. - We show that testing can leave 15-30% bandwidth on the table per link, should this be acceptable or should more troubleshooting be done? - Is it really neccessary to utilize Mutltilink interfaces on

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS or ?

Troy Beisigl wrote: Hi all, We are looking to do the setup shown below. Customer 1 has 3 locations (A, B and C) and would like to be able to pass private traffic between all (WAN) and would also like to get internet access as well. Two of those locations will be DS1 circuits and the

Re: [c-nsp] MLPPP product from the provider point of view

Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:07:51AM -0400, Joe Maimon wrote: - In theory, one virtual template can be used for all mlppp customers, as they will establish seperate bundles with their endpoint discriminators, correct? Yes. How do you protect against

Re: [c-nsp] ppp limit ccp

Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: Joe Maimon wrote on Monday, March 31, 2008 3:26 PM: Anybody know exactly what this command does? Cant find it documented. router(config)#ppp limit ccp ? 1-8000 Number of CCP sessions allowed as the name suggests, one can limit the number of PPP

Re: [c-nsp] 2950 Spanning-tree question

Is there anything to the right of FIBER? Charles Regan wrote: I want to implement a spanning-tree configuration on my network to have redundant path in case of hardware failure. Currently my setup is like this: FIBER TRAFFIC-SHAPER-BRIDGE CACHE-SERVER-BRIDGE 2811 ROUTER

Re: [c-nsp] Route reflectors, BGP router redundancy et. Al.

Dracul wrote: Hi All, I'm building a design that involves having a 2nd BGP router to act as a backup if something goes wrong with the main router (heaven forbid). I have two peers to different ISP's. There are some questions I have in mind: a. Should my configuration involve route

Re: [c-nsp] RBE and PPPOE on the same router

. Thanks, Paulo Amaral MegaNet Communications P: 508 646 0030 - P.A -Original Message- P.A From: Joe Maimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.A Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 3:50 PM

Re: [c-nsp] mac address question

Take an old ethernet card, copy its mac address and throw the ethernet card out. Use that mac address. Realistically, the TELCO is actually asking for what to put in a layer 2 access list. You want to be able to connect multiple routers, for example with an ATM switch, so tell them a mac

Re: [c-nsp] mac address question

to make one up and pass that along to them? Thanks, Paul P.A -Original Message- P.A From: Joe Maimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.A Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:50 AM P.A To: Paul A P.A Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net P.A Subject: Re: [c-nsp] mac address question P.A

Re: [c-nsp] Router / Switch in front of Firewall

Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 03:51:38PM +0200, Tor-Ivar Kristoffersen wrote: Solution is to set a Cisco switch / router in front with 2 IF's. A 3550 will do as well. Get a reasonable supplyer. Forcing RFC1918 addresses on customer transit links is no way to run an

Re: [c-nsp] DMVPN Rollout -- MTU questions

John Kougoulos wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2008, Eric Cables wrote: The above, however, doesn't seem to work in some cases. Users as these sites complain of intermittent connectivity problems, which seem to be solved rather quickly by reducing the IP MTU, and configuring TCP adjust-mss. I

Re: [c-nsp] Discussion list for RADIUS?

Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: Hi, Hi, Does anyone know of a good discussion list for the RADIUS protocol? You could try the freeradius list. You could also try the freeradius server. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Frame to ATM

Jason Berenson wrote: Greetings, We just got a new Covad DS3 and ordered an end T1 as frame relay. The backhaul is ATM. Here's my network: Covad will perform FRF ATM conversion for you. You just take the pvc and do your ip routing on it. Now if you want a multilink configuration,

[c-nsp] line protocol stays down

Hey All, On a 3845 with 4 VWIC-2MFT-T1 wics. 3 on the engine blade, one in a network module. One day IOS boots up with cookie errors, VWIC on NM is unrecognized. Reload, it comes back. However, T1 on that VWIC comes up green, but line protocol stays down. T1 works fine in other VWIC,

Re: [c-nsp] Giving customers access to your gear.

Christian wrote: I've had to deal with the same scenario on multiple occasions It comes down to if we give customer access to the router, then the managed service disappears - as it defeats the purpose of managed services - if they wish to obtain control then let them buy the router from you

Re: [c-nsp] BGP network stops being advertized

Deepak Jain wrote: Justin Shore wrote: Jeff Fitzwater wrote: loopback or another interface (usually a static route of last resort to the loopback address/interface). loopback or null? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Routing between VRF and non-VRF

Garry wrote: Maybe I'm missing something here, but what's the right way of routing between VRF and non-VRF interfaces? In my opinion, by being able to define a physical or logical interface between them. Which you can currently, at cost of handling the packet twice. Which is silly, but

[c-nsp] ASA vpn client to secondary ip address

Hey all, I am trying to get a new range of IP addresses on a asa/pix to work for vpn clients. Doesnt seem to work. Can anyone share any tips? Thanks, Joe ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASA vpn client to secondary ip address

. Except one is actually the ASA's outside interface address and the other isnt. Thanks, Joe Christian Koch wrote: can you elaborate? do you mean create a pool of ip's for ravpn users to grab from? On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Joe Maimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [c-nsp] Peoples experiences with the 3825

David Barak wrote: I don#39;t have the link in front of me, but I remember a document describing the 3825 as working well for a partial DS3, and the 3845 as working for a full DS3. I believe thats with all features such as nat, acl, fw, ipsec, ids turned on. Also, the ESW modules have

Re: [c-nsp] Crypto map + traffic via ip route vrf ... global

Peter Rathlev wrote: Hi, The traffic that doesn't get encrypted comes from a VRF Lite subinterface on the back of the 7200. This VRF has a static 0/0 route with a global next hop, and the global table has a static route pointing the other way. Sure would make things simpler if inter-vrf

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ATM on 7206? (Getting really frustrated here)

Nathan wrote: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't believe this isn't simple! I just want to change the PVC on the [expletive] ATM cells and push them back the same way they came, how can that be so difficult? Are you looking for the local switching

Re: [c-nsp] 3550 switch password question

Jen Linkova wrote: On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:47 AM, chloe K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1/ When I boot up the switch, the switch can be accessed by console without password in user mode ls it normal? Absolutely. It's a default configuration which allows you to access the switch and

Re: [c-nsp] setting source address for icmp messages

Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: Mike wrote on Monday, February 09, 2009 00:28: No. I am trying to ensure that if the router ever emits icmp messages like 'destination host unreachable', 'icmp frag needed' and the like, that I'm using a public routed ip and not some random flavor of the

Re: [c-nsp] How to assign same virtual interface to a PPPoE customer

Assuming you use a radius server that can place its accounting data in a sql server, this should work fairly well for you http://www.jmaimon.com/freeradius/mrtg-radsql/mrtg-radsql.tar.gz M Usman Ashraf wrote: Hi Oliver, Just wanted to plot MRTG for customers whose CPE has no SNMP support

[c-nsp] vrf aware cluster-id

Running 124T to take advantage of per vrf bgp router id so that the router can have loopback bgp connections. However, route-reflector-client is not taking effect, the neighbor reports denied CLUSTER_LIST loop. Apparently cluster-id needs to be vrf aware as well for this to work. Is this in

Re: [c-nsp] c7200 format bootflash: etc

Hey, I am having the same issue with a I/O controller, I have been trying different combinations of IOS, but I cant seem to get this resolved. Do you have c7200-boot-mz.120-21.ST.bin ? Thanks, Joe FreeLSD wrote: btw, seems 122-14.S15 and 122-18.S10 have broken format for bootflash: and

Re: [c-nsp] Global Route Leaking on same PE

Tim Durack wrote: Amen to that. I've played around with the various loopback strategies, including using a gre tunnel that originates/terminates on the same PE. It worked, but didn't seem like a scalable solution. A dot1q trunk between two ports (if your not using a switch platform as

Re: [c-nsp] DNS rewrite global capabilities

Sam Stickland wrote: Roland Dobbins wrote: But even more than that, putting your public-facing DNS (or any other kind of server) behind a firewall is a very serious architectural mistake; firewalls in front of public-facing servers provide no security value whatsoever, and degrade the

[c-nsp] ip per-packet load-sharing on single interface

ip per-packet load-sharing on single ethernet interface with multiple iBGP routes installed to different nodes on that ethernet interface. Software router, 12.3 Does not seem to be balancing. Is this supposed to work? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] ip per-packet load-sharing on single interface

Of Joe Maimon Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 22:29 To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] ip per-packet load-sharing on single interface ip per-packet load-sharing on single ethernet interface with multiple iBGP routes installed to different nodes on that ethernet interface. Software router, 12.3 Does

Re: [c-nsp] 7500 for DSL aggregation - RSP memory error?

I view the rpr feature as completely useless in the real world. Cold spare are way more effective. The last time I had a rp failure, it was fixed by yanking one and leaving the other. In other words, odds are it causes more issues than it resolves. Just added complexity for a box where its

[c-nsp] Route redistribution and selection

We are having a problem where routes originated by the customer because of their backup paths are preventing the mpls bgp routes from being installed and used on the PE. Customer has an eigrp routed network. We are hosting a bgp mpls network for the customer. At the Customer's HQ PE router,

[c-nsp] SHDSL Wic in a 1751-1 CPE

I am testing a turnkey CPE solution combining T1, SDSL, ADSL and PRI handoff to customer PBX, with the 1751 transcoding SIP to PRI channels. A CPE I am testing with a WIC-1SHDSL-V2 doesnt seem to be training properly. The controller continues to report DSL firmware download in progress,

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Recommendation | 7600/RSP720-3CXL

Raymond, Steven wrote: Have found the least bugs in SRD1, but non-cisco bgp neighbors sometimes require the use of hidden command neighbor x.x.x.x dont-capability-negotiate or the session won't restore. I recall being on the other end of that one. Good tip.

Re: [c-nsp] Route redistribution and selection

- From: Luan Nguyen [mailto:l...@netcraftsmen.net] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:44 PM To: 'Joe Maimon'; 'cisco-nsp' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Route redistribution and selection You might want to check this link out: http://wiki.nil.com/Multihomed_MPLS_VPN_sites_running_EIGRP Regards

Re: [c-nsp] C7206VXR boot issue

Probably would help to know what IO controller and NPE you have, what image is the bootloader, where and what image you are trying to boot. Not always can a 7200 boot directly of ide flash. Do you have any configuration, such as boot statements? Mikisa Richard wrote: Hi all, I have an issue

Re: [c-nsp] Enhanced download procedure

Jay Hennigan wrote: What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright scary: http://www.west.net/~jay/images/cisco-wants-root.png Enhanced downloads, brought to you by the same people who brought

[c-nsp] NPE-G1 cant read Compact Flash

So this happily running router executes a write mem, which archives a copy to the CF card. Then it hangs and doesnt come back. Hard reset of the router doesnt read the CF card and boots the boot helper instead or just hangs. ROMMON cant read the CF card, a 256MB. Cant read a new 1G card.

Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 cant read Compact Flash

ML wrote: Are the alternate CF cards formatted correctly for your platform? Probably. However, IOS doesnt seem to think there is any card there or worse, it hangs upon insert. The original CF card may have gone bad but if you're sure the other CF cards are OK then they may be formatted

Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 cant read Compact Flash

Łukasz Bromirski wrote: On 2009-12-24 17:51, Joe Maimon wrote: The original CF card may have gone bad but if you're sure the other CF cards are OK then they may be formatted wrong. The card is fine, tested in external reader. They are all fine. The CF slot of NPE-G1 is very picky about CF

[c-nsp] spanning-tree bpdufilter leaks

Apparently, bpdufilter leaks sometimes on some switches, and I have the packet traces to prove it. The switches are probably not supported, so replacements are likely in order. Anyone have an opinion of which cisco switches/IOS are guaranteed not to leak through bpdufilter?

Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 cant read Compact Flash

the key is whether the flash is referred to as slotX or diskX. if the nomenclature is slotX it uses a proprietary disk format which cannot be read by an external reader. to format CF card for use with older system format slot0: Joe Maimon wrote: ML wrote: Are the alternate CF cards formatted

Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree bpdufilter leaks

Marko Milivojevic wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 04:00, Joe Maimonjmai...@ttec.com wrote: Apparently, bpdufilter leaks sometimes on some switches, and I have the packet traces to prove it. The switches are probably not supported, so replacements are likely in order. Did you have it enabled

Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree bpdufilter leaks

Bill Blackford wrote: Do you have any details? Models? Code vers? -b 3524XL, 12.0(5)WC17 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree bpdufilter leaks

Marko Milivojevic wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 04:00, Joe Maimonjmai...@ttec.com wrote: Apparently, bpdufilter leaks sometimes on some switches, and I have the packet traces to prove it. The switches are probably not supported, so replacements are likely in order. To clarify, it only

[c-nsp] CPE with tracking redundancy and long lived (UDP) nat sessions

Hey All, So as is commonly talked about, I have seen a number of end user sites with simple redundancy service using IOS routers. Multiple lines, coulds be the same provider, could be different providers, no dynamic routing, different source addresses, uRPF/SAV at the provider(s) is to be

Re: [c-nsp] CPE with tracking redundancy and long lived (UDP) nat sessions

- From: Joe Maimon [mailto:jmai...@ttec.com] Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 5:06 PM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] CPE with tracking redundancy and long lived (UDP) nat sessions Hey All, So as is commonly talked about, I have seen a number of end user sites with simple redundancy service using

Re: [c-nsp] CPE with tracking redundancy and long lived (UDP) nat sessions

Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: Obviously the router does NOT check the ip nat rules if it gets a match in the NAT translation table. This behavior makes sense; if you'd change the NAT parameters of a live session, you'd lose the session anyway. The problem is that the session stays active. I want

Re: [c-nsp] CPE with tracking redundancy and long lived (UDP) nat sessions

Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: The problem is that the session stays active. I want the session to be lost. I believe the rules should be adhered to a bit more strictly. The session DOES NOT stay active. The phone is stupid. It should have realized there's no reply and restart the session. With

[c-nsp] Redistributing External EIGRP routes through MPLS vpn

Hey All, Seems like I have run into a difficulty where CE#1 external EIGRP routes (redistribute connected/redistribute static) are learned by PE#1, redistributed to PE#2, but not redistributed to CE#2 CE - PE, EIGRP PE - PE, MPLS/BGP The workaround is to use network statements, making the

Re: [c-nsp] Redistributing External EIGRP routes through MPLS vpn

of the CCO document ? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/fteipece.html#wp1027175 Shimol Shah On 5/17/10 2:57 PM, Joe Maimon wrote: Hey All, Seems like I have run into a difficulty where CE#1 external EIGRP routes (redistribute connected/redistribute static

Re: [c-nsp] Redistributing External EIGRP routes through MPLS vpn

thing like eigrp stub connected :) - Luan Nguyen Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC. - -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joe Maimon Sent

Re: [c-nsp] Redistributing External EIGRP routes through MPLS vpn

, Joe Maimon jmai...@ttec.com mailto:jmai...@ttec.com wrote: Perhaps something like this shows what I ran into better - I'll have to try and see if I can build it in a lab. The CE would not see the connected routes of the other CE's, unless a network statement is used instead

Re: [c-nsp] pop site battery backup recommendations

Mike wrote: Howdy, This isn't exactly cisco-centric, but it's certainly related operationally. I operate a county wide isp network and I have about 15 different pops. I equip each with APC700/1400's and with XR battery packs, with the goal being around 8 hours of runtime in the event of a

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR BGP within the box question

I sure hope you have better luck than I did. http://www.mail-archive.com/cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg20125.html steven.glog...@swisscom.com wrote: hi all just a short question (related to a quite new feature from cisco). with the new cisco ASR software (15.0(1)S - released some days ago)

Re: [c-nsp] PA-FE-TX Duplex

Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:28:48PM -0400, Sridhar Ayengar wrote: Is there any way to get a PA-FE-TX to autonegotiate duplex? No. The PA-FE-TX and the 7200-IO-FE just don't do duplex negotiation. This is about the only bit of hardware that still needs forcing of

Re: [c-nsp] Linear Flash

A recent bootflash image will boot system images from ATAPI/IDE (normal) flash, and will work with cf+pc card adapter up to at least 1gb size (personal experience) rt01#sh bootflash: -#- ED type --crc--- -seek-- nlen -length- -date/time- name 1 .. image

Re: [c-nsp] Linear Flash

, SN: 21850522 Sridhar Ayengar wrote: Joe Maimon wrote: A recent bootflash image will boot system images from ATAPI/IDE (normal) flash, and will work with cf+pc card adapter up to at least 1gb size (personal experience) This applies to the RSP4 too? Not just the RSP4+? Peace... Sridhar

Re: [c-nsp] PA-FE-TX, PA-FE-TX/ISL, PA-2FE-TX, PA-2FE-TX/ISL

I would stay far far away from the 2 port FE port adapters, no matter what they say on them. I would stick with VIP2-50 (or higher) with 128DRAM and only port adapters that work well in there. Only VIP2-50 (or better) and RSP in the chassis. Nothing else. Use a cheap catalyst switch like

Re: [c-nsp] PA-FE-TX, PA-FE-TX/ISL, PA-2FE-TX, PA-2FE-TX/ISL

Real world I would not expect any more than roughly the same throughput through a 7500 RSP4 with VIP2-50 as you will an NPE-400. Sridhar Ayengar wrote: Joe Maimon wrote: If you are shopping the used market, you may be better off with the 7200 series. The 7500 isnt worth the juice it sucks

[c-nsp] L2TP radius periodic acccounting

Any ideas on how to get a LAC to obey aaa accounting update periodic 5 Its just sending floods. I have had to turn off accounting. Getting L2TP lac to use specific aaa methods seems to be problematic as well. Thanks, Joe ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] More than 128M CF on C1800 router?

Nick Hilliard wrote: So, C1800 series routers nominally support a maximum of 128M external flash (CF). Will 256M flash cards work at all, or will they do something silly like refusing to boot? 128M CF cards have become less easy to get these days, and I'm not inclined to pay a discounted $700

Re: [c-nsp] Dynamic dns on a cisco ios router

I have found that using ip sla http method to be much more reliable and configurable for my purposes. Joe Ziv Leyes wrote: As promised, I report back, sorry for the delay... I can confirm that this method worked fine for me! The only captcha that I had (I've forgotten about it and took me a

[c-nsp] Generic Traffic Shaping

Hey All, GTS. I believe it is inferior to any other policy-map that can get its bandwidth direct from the interface or layer2 configuration. GTS is for a fallback, for logical interfaces, for interfaces that do not have any other way of controlling and signaling available bandwdith.

Re: [c-nsp] multihoming solution over two different ISP's

Get a 2950 or even a 3524XL, use vlans and subinterfaces. Use BGP if available. Otherwise, if you are already using NAT, then this should work fine. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/12_3x/12_3xe/feature/guide/dbackupx.html https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8313 If you need

Re: [c-nsp] WS-C2970G-24TS as access switches

Nikolay Shopik wrote: I've noticed WS-C2970G-24TS actually 1,5U, while other model just 1U. So I wonder if there any overheating issues? The physical design appears to be the same as 3550-12G and some of the 3750. The extra height is taken up by the PS and 2 fans which are on their own

[c-nsp] automatic bgp route refresh

Hey All, I would greatly appreciate it if somebody would point me to the release notes for the change I see in 15.1 where BGP neighbor route-map configurations happen in real time, without needing any clearing, soft or otherwise. Much obliged. Best, Joe

Re: [c-nsp] Megapath frame relay question

Odds are you have non routed address on the wan interface. Bill wrote: Dear Cisco gurus, I have the following simple config for a frame-relay T1 on Megapath's network: interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x (publicly addressable /29) duplex auto speed auto !

Re: [c-nsp] Megapath frame relay question

Use some nat if you want to source traffic from the router and have it attempt to use the unrouted address and still work. Of course, you could start hard configuring which address various router initiated traffic sourced from, but this is a much more complete approach. ip access-list

Re: [c-nsp] Megapath frame relay question

originating from the router itself. BTW, the reason I need this to work is the router has a couple FXS ports in it. None of the dial-peer stuff works under the current configuration. -Original Message- From: Joe Maimon [mailto:jmai...@ttec.com] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 1:08 PM To: Bill

Re: [c-nsp] Failing to load IOS

You can run latest 151 on npe-400 Why dont you try that instead of going from one outdated ios to another? Joseph Mays wrote: Also, just as a sanity check -- I cannot find a listing for separate ram for the IOS. Does the NPE-400 set aside memory for the IOS load from the main memory? And if

Re: [c-nsp] Testing New BGP Provider

Have them setup an additional multihop ebgp setup that you can funnel to a disjoint route server so that you can examine what exactly is in their full table. Thats a good way to find the rfc1918 prefixes and customer routes and more specific peer routes that really dont belong there. Or

[c-nsp] QoS match vlan

Hey All, I am looking for some experience or information regarding this feature, which allows you to apply qos service policies across diverse vlan subinterfaces, by using a class matching the vlan tags on the parent interface. The feature seems to work on software platforms (7200

Re: [c-nsp] Overlapping Subnet Issue - Gateway IP Resides in Vendor Assigned Public IP Range

Spencer Barnes wrote: Hello, I can change the g0/0 interface to 10.0.128.66 255.255.255.252 and assign the other interface g0/1 10.0.128.96 255.255.255.224 but then I lose a bunch of external IPs. Only with proxy-arp. Your provider has put that subnet on the wire. Seems like they want

Re: [c-nsp] automatic bgp route refresh

Joe Maimon wrote: Hey All, I would greatly appreciate it if somebody would point me to the release notes for the change I see in 15.1 where BGP neighbor route-map configurations happen in real time, without needing any clearing, soft or otherwise. Much obliged. Best, Joe So I opened

[c-nsp] Traffic shaping does not work (and is not supported) on Port-Channel interfaces on Software based routers

All, FYI, yet another occurrence of Cisco TAC coming to the conclusion that yes it does not work, and no, they dont have to fix it, because they have decided that it is not supported. Is it an unreasonable expectation to expect product features to interoperate unless clearly stated that

Re: [c-nsp] Traffic shaping does not work (and is not supported) on Port-Channel interfaces on Software based routers

Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:05:50AM -0400, Joe Maimon wrote: Is it an unreasonable expectation to expect TAC support contracts to deliver results and resolutions instead of yet another thing we wont support? But they *do* deliver results. Documentation gets updated

  1   2   >