http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 19:39 ---
Have you tried booting with the 'noapic' option? Maybe also try 'acpi=off', I
think acpi was still enabled by default then.
--- You are receiving this mail
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 19:53 ---
See bug 2981 for a better menu entry, which also fixes the incorrect behaviour
outside KDE (ie starting up as user instead of root).
--- You are receiving this
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2981
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 19:58 ---
I am attaching a menu file that fixes this, save it in /usr/lib/menu, and run
'update-menus', and it should fix your first problem.
Please explain (2) better, since
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2981
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 20:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=369)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=369action=view)
Menu file which fixes this and bug 240 also.
--- You are
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2755
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3349
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 11:54 ---
Can you just confirm whether, when there is no local account in /etc/passwd,
whether:
$ getent passwd user
works correctly?
(this is the mechanism all programs
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
] bgmilne]$ df /
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hde6 8256888 6737704 1099760 86% /
(/home is seperate and almost nothing is on / that was not installed from RPMs)
Your 4GB is not nearly enough for all of contrib and cooker, and you would
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 23:23 ---
Is this still valid?
If so, what says:
# ifstatus -v
# ifconfig
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 23:34 ---
Don't know what Luis's problem was, utuhiro's was probably lack of support for
ifplugd/mii-tool etc in the Realtek 8029 cards (all using the ne2k-pci driver?).
Luis,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2672
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3349
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3396
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-17 16:34 ---
ACPI is disabled by default since it causes problems on many machines.
You can enable ACPI in Mandrake Control Center-Boot-Boot Config-Configure
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3396
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3596
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libsasl2-plug-ntlm |libqt3
Product|galaxy-kde
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3569
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3596
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3185
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3629
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-04 19:30 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
iuri.f wrote:
crashes kde printing system -
kcontrol.
Does it work with other printers? Do you by any chance use
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3081
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3331
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to compile lirc 0.7pre1 to support my PVR-250 and its new
remote. However, when running the lirc autogen.sh script it
complains that automake v1.5 is required. So:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]$ rpm -qa|grep automake
En/na Buchan Milne ha escrit:
I agree. At present, uw-imap and (IIRC this was done for 9.1)
courier-imap, if you add a user to the system, their mail works (with
no further mess).
that's because uw-imap user database *is* the system database, there's
no way out. cyrus-imapd otoh can manage
Well, SPARC's (and at some point Alpha and Opteron 240 SMP) at CSC are
on private network behind 9.1 i586 box. I can't see anything that
should stop us from creating the extranet and have the builds automated
and
coordinated. Some centralised user authentication might be a good idea
at
fredagen den 6 juni 2003 21.27 skrev Vincent Danen:
I'm thinking more like the next release, possible ways to claim a
more secure os. It's just a way of thinking..., maybe we could do
this and get away with it, or maybe not. The usability will have to
remain, but certain things would have
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
yes and you get mail for mister rpcuser actually delivered :(
Which can easily be prevented, especially when using courier+ldap.
By taking advantage of an LDAP environment, and using PAM, if I
create an LDAP account, virtually
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:20:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
only because noone has already scripted for him something that is
functional?, I am positive m$ exchange does not auto create a mailbox
for every user on windows
Luca Berra wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:12:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I DO agree with you in that the user should be able to check the
checkbox, if you leave me the possibility of modifying what the checkbox
does, that is.
Well, you would then probably want to be able to
:-)
OK, then I will stop working on a libconf
(http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/LibconfProject)
backend for OpenLDAP
What you are working on, is it a way of storing the
configuration in LDAP instead of PERL? If that is the
case it is a very cool concept.
No ... but I do
fredagen den 30 maj 2003 19.13 skrev magic:
I was going to reply to the last openldap message, but decided to
start a new thread.
I am presently building a mail server based on MDK 9.1 with updates
(not cooker environment).
I rebuilt Buchan's openldap 2.1.19 (against the original
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:53:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not totally convinced every sysadmin needs something like this, in
our network we have an internal ftp mirror of main+contrib+updates for
any realease we have on any machines (well, we had to write 8.2 to DVD
since we
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:13:09PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
First stab:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RequestedFeatures
Those with edit access on the Wiki, feel free to expand ...
Here's a few other ones (I don't have write access).
How about more support for a small
Ran across this one today... I'm in the process of testing it and so far
so good. (Only one box at the moment.) This program is originally
written for the 2.5 kernel but has been back ported to 2.4. Given the
difficulties supermount has had I was wondering if this might make it
easier for
On Fri, 30 May 2003 20:24:12 +0200, bgmiln wrote:
BTW, I will investigate the auxiliary objectclass account
Are you referring to the message Luke Howard sent to OpenIT's Core-Dev
list that I referred to in the other openldap 2.1 thread?
Yes.
which is in
pam_ldap, and see what can be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2003 20:24:12 +0200, bgmiln wrote:
BTW, I will investigate the auxiliary objectclass account
Are you referring to the message Luke Howard sent to OpenIT's Core-Dev
list that I referred to in the other openldap 2.1 thread?
I discovered that if
Es Diumenge 01 Juny 2003 13:58, en [EMAIL PROTECTED] va escriure:
i tried with noapic and acpi=off but it failed too.
What about removing any acpi reference and adding noapic ?
i tried without any acpi reference and it doesn't work too.Whatever i
do when acpi is different that acpi=off
the subject says it all
v.
Vincent, I think in future could we avoid announcements like this on
cooker? If we were to have an announcement for every new release on this
list, it could get quite crowded.
Note that many maintainers either
-subscribe to the announce mailing lists for the
I got a good deal on a toshiba 2435 so I didn't get too picky.
Boy, what an experience getting it installed.
This may already be a well known issue, and then maybe not
so I figured better safe to say something.
The install kernel alt1 was able to complete an install
and zap the
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
you can configure samba/ apache/ , manage packages, .
with ncursses DrakConf ?
Find out for yourself:
# unset DISPLAY
# drakxconf
# drakwizard
Hmm, drakwizard seems to miss a cancel button in ncurses, so you may need
to background it to kill it ... but it
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 17:38, Buchan Milne wrote:
on this? I coincidentally had a problem with ifplugd too, today. After
restarting my firewall machine, the eth0 interface (which is connected
to the ADSL modem) came up without problems, but the eth1 (connected to
the internal network) came
J. A Magallon wrote:
That is one of the things I don't like of ifplugd. I want my private
interface up even with no cable plugged. I want to have the if up, and a
dhcpd running on it for the moment I plug in anything. And also
netatalk, smb, and ipforwarding.
I configured eth1 with static
On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 04:10, Luis Ortega wrote:
I would if I knew what bothered you. I am very much
interested in this package being promptly packaged as
I am testing it.
For this kind of central package you can take it as read that the
packager will be aware of releases as soon as they
It's the glob. For better packaging, you would at least use something
like
%{_libdir}/%{name}
%{_libdir}/whatever
Why??? Until now, we knew that there would only ever be files that needed
to be in the package there. What happens when rpm decides they now want
unstripped copies of binaries in
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 12:27:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, for some reason samba3beta1 builds fine on my cooker box (well,
my cvs snapshot from Thursday did), but fails on the build cluster,
with:
In file included from smbd/quotas.c:65:
/usr/include/linux/quota.h:48: error:
Hey Buchan, thanks for this information. And with
appologies to the list this was the purpose of my
short message announcing the beta release. I know that
you are working on it and was hoping that you would be
awake and would answer.
Ahh, but there are better ways of achieving this,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 03:37:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with 2.3.2-4mdk also. So it must be something else, possibly the fact
that klama is running kernel-2.4.19-16mdkenterprise (my cooker box is
running
it could be, but samba should not include kernel headers
Well, since klama
BTW, is there actually any real use for these debug packages. I had a
samba3-debug package (containing benchmark/validation tools), which I
now had to rename, and add provides/obsoletes for also.
They could at least have chosen a better name (-rpm_debug or
something) which is guaranteed not
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
/me admits his ignorance of the existance of mandrake cvs, i will
search for it and see if i have anything else to patch.
got a spec from samba cvs and would like some comments:
BTW, note the way things work, the samba release
Neither do I. Probably because I don't know the intention of creating
those debug info yet. Is this something new from stock rpm 4.2?
Apparently, but I am not sure ... I will ask on the maintainers list ...
If so,
I'd guess the name debug is chosen because Red Hat don't use this as
package
dams wrote:
Luis Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Originally, when I checked the wiki page on libconf I
felt that it would be more interesting if the config
information was stored in XML. That way, with some
API, the configuration modules could be written in any
language, not necessarily
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
libconf doesn't store the config information elsewhere than where
they are - in the config files. Libconf
In the end, there must only be one copy of the configuration
information (any other system with meta-configuration eventually has
problems with
Hi.
I have just tried comanche3-0b4 the apache config gui and it sucks...,
just wanted you all to know this.
I haven't tried comanche since I setup my first apache server, which was a
long time ago (in the days of Netscape 3 and IE 2!). I thought it
might be worth something in a few
I would like to hear what you think about ksambaplugin ... I think
it's good enough to be used by newbie samba admin's, without needing
SWAT or webmin for anything.
I have not used it yet but if you would like to point me to were I can
get it I'll install and see what can be done.
#
Hi all,
We have full Vietnamese support in 9.1 and I would like to build a
Knoppix-like CD using Mandrake. There is virtual-linux.org but the site
is down last couple days. Anyone knows what happen to it?
I googled a bit and found a few but they are all for different
distributions (Gentoo,
Martin Fahrendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do you know why postfix in cooker still uses sasl v1?
anyway i just took the sources for sasl v1 and rebuild saslauthd for
sasl1 (changing the socket path) and it works like charm with
postfix.
regards,
L.
because ldap uses sasl v1 and
You suggesting to calculate it. These calculations can become very
complex. I would suggest to make a log. So if you urpmi foo, you also
have to install bar and blah. This results in a line in
/var/cache/urpmi/installlog: foo bar blah
Q: What would the impact be if you install multiple
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4052
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-06 19:18 ---
Stefan, we just started using autofs (after installing our 2nd NFS server) with
automount maps in LDAP. I haven't rebooted my machine (ldap slave, all ldap
traffic is
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4095
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-06 20:20 ---
You (bug poster) didn't provide a link to the patch, but gcc-3.3-2mdk changelog
shows:
* Tue Jun 17 2003 Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.3-2mdk
- Add reload1 patch
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3843
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-06 20:23 ---
IIRC, this perl module depends on the Netscape LDAP SDK, which is non-free. All
apps that use it should be fixed to use Net::LDAP instead, which is based on
libldap and
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3452
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-06 14:52 ---
1. Improve the documentation. The documentation for ifcfg does not mention
MII_NOT_SUPPORTED. This should change.
See
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4082
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4082
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4165
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-07 21:48 ---
It's very weird that 4000 other packages work fine with glibc in Mandrake 9.0
and 9.1, and one package that breaks blames it on glibc.
If the author can't provide
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4169
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-07 13:23 ---
Have you tried these packages:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/glibc/
If they make your application work, it means the bug is in your application,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3615
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-07 16:45 ---
There is an unofficial kernel update available that provides ACLs on XFS. It is
available in the unsupported/MandrakeClub directory of the Mandrake-devel
mirrors. I
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4227
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-21-07 19:54 ---
Please provide the contents of /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient-eth?.leases
It seems your provider's DHCP server is not in sync with the PTR records on
their DNS server, since
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4218
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4159
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 16:08 ---
Please post the output of:
$ /sbin/lsmod
both before and after you configure the card.
Also, the output of:
cat /proc/cmdline
may be useful, as well as the contents
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4256
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 23:03 ---
Should rpm-build require autoconf-1.4 or should each package that requires
autoconf-1.4 require it explicitly ?
I assume you meant automake.
There is no easy
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3543
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3312
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4275
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4313
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4307
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 20:30 ---
You don't, there is no package you can install to satisfy libcom_err.so.3
without problems. Wait for your mirror to catch up to latest evolution package.
More contrib
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4393
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 20:25 ---
Hmmm, I am not sure if this is one or two bugs. But the path provided by
/usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc is incorrect:
$ grep -i path /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc.rpmnew
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=375
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4287
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4414
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
101 - 200 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
