[courier-users] Fwd: Re: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
Hi Markus, I hope you don't mind me forwarding your email to the courier-users mailing-list. There are some users their that wold be very interested in uptodate packages for stretch that would hopefully also filter down to the ubuntu repos. Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:56:58 +0200 From: Markus WannerTo: Ondřej Surý , debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Willi Mann , courier-i...@lists.sourceforge.net CC: Mark Constable Hi, it's certainly a bit late, but I'd like to adopt the courier mta packages, as stated in the wnpp bugs. (Stumbled over this old mail only today.) On 12/06/2016 03:04 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > I have filled RFH (Request for Help) bug on courier package, but nobody > responded so far. Today I have changed that to RFA (Request for > Adoption) and I intend to properly orphan the packages before stretch > release and remove them from next Debian stable release. Well, unless > somebody comes up and makes a hard promise to take care of all Courier > MTA till Debian stretch (next stable) end-of-life and becomes > maintainers. Well, that's hard to promise, but I'll try to get courier ready for stretch, in the first place. If that effort isn't successful, it should better be dropped from stretch. > Please note that the bug list on src:courier is rather long: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no=courier > (143 filled bugs) and it will need some time to comb through the list, > close the non-issues, fix the Debian related bugs and forward the > appropriate bugs to upstream. I would suggest it might be better this > would be a team effort. While I'm a long-time courier user and DD, I clearly don't qualify as a team. I'd certainly appreciate help and would instantly hand over maintenance to one. Kind Regards Markus Wanner -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
On 01/25/2017 06:33 PM, Ángel wrote: > As for the debian bug reports, the work seems to lie in the list of > normal unclassified bugs that would need to be reviewed and most likely > tested. If you are interested in bugs, you should also try to go look up all the bugs Ondrej closed too. he closed them in large batches without review. Many were still valid issues at the time of closing. This was one of the many complaints people had with the way he mismanaged the packages. I applaud your work and hope someone will pick up courier, but I've already started working on migrating all of the systems I am responsible to other packages/systems. At this point, the removal of Courier from Debian and derivatives is almost certain and administrators should be acting accordingly (move to other packages or compile their own). -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
As someone interested in keeping courier in Debian, I had been interested in looking at Ondřej changes (and its consequences) since I first saw this thread. I have now compiled the new packages and performed a (really basic) local install. I'm not too keen on the move of couriertls into courier-base, though. In my view, it is itself an independent package, and it shouldn't require eg. the authdaemon (while it did have a depends to courier-base, I seem recall it wasn't really needed). A bug I noticed on install is that although courier-base is using /usr/sbin/mkdhparams to create properly-sized 4096 DH parameters in /etc/courier/dhparams.pem, the smtpd certificate was created with /usr/lib/courier/mkesmtpdcert which, after generating the certificate, appends a 512-byte (weak) dh parameter. This openssl gendh line was removed upstream in 2014 on 1e1b535b440b93474d243fe363635f0ec18427cd, but gets readded by patch 12. (d0e8408cc changes it from gendh to dhparam, but still adds it to the autogenerated certificate. It should be removed) I would recommend automatically adding mkdhparams to /etc/cron.monthly, too. As for the debian bug reports, the work seems to lie in the list of normal unclassified bugs that would need to be reviewed and most likely tested. Also, looking at the patches carried by debian, the numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12*, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21, 23 and 25 seem quite uncontroversial for being applied upstream. Could you add them to your queue to ponder their inclusion, Sam? Best regards -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
On 11/12/16 23:02, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > I'm not clear whether Ondřej's changes break compatibility with the > current package. If aiming at an incompatible repackaging, dropping > the existing packages and creating new ones can be easier. Call it > /renaming/ if you like. They are a significant departure from the original 0.68.2-1ubuntu7 packages in xenial:universe/mail. Not only are Ondřej's packages using almost current source (0.76.2-1+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) but they have changed the default user ID from "deamon" to "courier" which essentially means that a simple upgrade is not really possible. I spent a lot of time testing Ondřej's packages as he built them and I could never do a simple upgrade. I always had to completely uninstall the old packages and start a fresh courier install. He also amalgamated a few packages so that these ones became redundant... courier-imap-ssl - Courier mail server - IMAP over SSL [transitional] courier-maildrop - Courier mail server - mail delivery agent [transitional package] courier-pop-ssl - Courier mail server - POP3 over SSL [transitional] courier-ssl - Courier mail server - SSL/TLS Support [transitional] and their functionality incorporated into the "parent" packages. One fairly significant change is that the maildrop package binary works a little differently from the "old" courier-maildrop binary, ie; in /etc/courier/courierd if one wanted global maildrop delivery then this workaround was needed... #DEFAULTDELIVERY="|/usr/bin/maildrop -w 90 -V 1" DEFAULTDELIVERY='|/usr/bin/maildrop -w 90 -d "${RECIPIENT}"' Other than clearing out all remnants of the old "daemon" owned files and directories so the newer "courier" owned components would not be compromised it all seems to work. Ondřej did an amazing job... deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ondrej/courier/ubuntu xenial main FWIW this is a fairly good history of what Ondřej did to the packages... https://github.com/oerdnj/deb.sury.org/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aclosed%20courier > I propose interested Ubuntu users subscribe here. I reckon > subscribers of this list, even if not interested in Debian packaging, > are more likely to occasionally lend some interest on the subject > than subscribers of Ububtu- or Debian- devel who are not interested > in Courier or mail. Am I wrong? The original packages list... Maintainer: Ubuntu DevelopersOriginal-Maintainer: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) ... so I presume ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com has some bearing on whether the newer packages could ever replace the old ones, which could only ever formally happen in post-xenial releases. On 12/12/16 01:03, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Although Github's bug tracker is enabled, I don't link to it directly > from www.courier-mta.org/links.html, only to the mailing lists. > Courier is stable, and requires very little maintenance. Github's bug > tracker is there, for anyone that wants to use it. Well there we go. Maybe it is possible to ask Sam to include the /debian directories from Ondřejs' PPA packages into his Github and personal git repos so the issue of the canonical (not Canonical) upstream source is no longer ambiguous? That should satisfy the Debian/Ubuntu upstream requirements so whoever was the formal package maintainer would only have to build and submit the packages direct from Github and a "bunch of us deb using guys" only have to focus on the QA of that /debian directory which we could mainly coordinate via the Github issue tracker, and of course this list. -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
On 12/11/2016 02:02 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Sun 11/Dec/2016 12:51:00 +0100 Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: >> On 12/11/2016 03:12 AM, Mark Constable wrote: >>> On 11/12/16 03:09, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: On 07/12/16 00:04, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > I intend to properly orphan the packages before stretch release and > remove them from next Debian stable release. Well, unless somebody > comes up and makes a hard promise to take care of all Courier MTA till > Debian stretch (next stable) end-of-life and becomes maintainers. >>> >>> This was one of the saddest emails I have ever received. >>> >>> If my servers ran Archlinux I'd have no problem building from source, >>> and even maintaining a source package in AUR, but even though I am a >>> staunch ubuntu-server user I really don't like debs (or rpm) packaging. > > Aha, that implies you know them somewhat... > >>> I have little choice left but to start testing postfix/dovecot :-( >>> >>> And so far I really despise what I see after becoming so comfortable >>> with courier. No SNI (SSL on a single IP) for a start and goodness >>> knows what else will be awkward to impossible to achieve compared to >>> the relative ease and unified sanity of the courier suite. >>> >>> And not least of all the superb effort put in by Sam, and others, on >>> this list to provide a level of consistent free support rarely seen >>> elsewhere (in my experience.) >>> I could lend a hand to the maintainer for couple of hours/month. I am Courier user > > +1 Although I use Debian (but not systemd) I always compiled Courier from > sources, so I know very little of Courier's Debian-specific stuff. > Though I've never used Debian's source/build infrastructure. > > Ditto, almost. > >>> That's very encouraging. I am less experienced with Debian packaging than >>> you so I'm not sure I can do much to help. It looks like ra...@linuxia.de >>> has retired from the original Debian packages and Ondřej put in an amazing >>> effort to re-package the latest source to run under the "courier" user >>> instead of the previous "daemon" user (more in line with original source). >> >> Yeah I had too little time to continue with maintaining such a large package >> on my own. I certainly appreciate Ondřej's support and I could help out >> with the Debian specifics of this package. > > I'm not clear whether Ondřej's changes break compatibility with the current > package. If aiming at an incompatible repackaging, dropping the existing > packages and creating new ones can be easier. Call it /renaming/ if you like. > > Pros. Renaming makes it clear that some work is needed to migrate to the new > packages. Custom scripts will have to be reviewed, for example. Bugs don't > need to be migrated, perhaps. > > Cons. Sense of discontinuity. Panic? > >>> Some discussion on ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com might dig up some >>> more support and help determine if Ondřejs' packages could replace the >>> current way-to-old barely-on-life-support package set. > > I propose interested Ubuntu users subscribe here. I reckon subscribers of > this > list, even if not interested in Debian packaging, are more likely to > occasionally lend some interest on the subject than subscribers of Ububtu- or > Debian- devel who are not interested in Courier or mail. Am I wrong? > Two things: The package has no git source https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/courier.html Courier upstream has no bug-tracking system. I would choose GitHub as a place to store /debian and to communicate with upstream. >>> >>> Unfortunately Sam doesn't seem interested in moving his whole development >>> system over to Github. >> >> We could also use the existing Git infrastructure of Debian for the packaging >> files (https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit). > > Is that the "Importing upstream as tarballs" thing? > Amongst other things, yes. Regards Racke > Ale > > -- > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi > ___ > courier-users mailing list > courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users > -- Ecommerce and Linux consulting + Perl and web application programming. Debian and Sympa administration. -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
On Sun 11/Dec/2016 12:51:00 +0100 Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: > On 12/11/2016 03:12 AM, Mark Constable wrote: >> On 11/12/16 03:09, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: >>> On 07/12/16 00:04, Ondřej Surý wrote: I intend to properly orphan the packages before stretch release and remove them from next Debian stable release. Well, unless somebody comes up and makes a hard promise to take care of all Courier MTA till Debian stretch (next stable) end-of-life and becomes maintainers. >> >> This was one of the saddest emails I have ever received. >> >> If my servers ran Archlinux I'd have no problem building from source, >> and even maintaining a source package in AUR, but even though I am a >> staunch ubuntu-server user I really don't like debs (or rpm) packaging. Aha, that implies you know them somewhat... >> I have little choice left but to start testing postfix/dovecot :-( >> >> And so far I really despise what I see after becoming so comfortable >> with courier. No SNI (SSL on a single IP) for a start and goodness >> knows what else will be awkward to impossible to achieve compared to >> the relative ease and unified sanity of the courier suite. >> >> And not least of all the superb effort put in by Sam, and others, on >> this list to provide a level of consistent free support rarely seen >> elsewhere (in my experience.) >> >>> I could lend a hand to the maintainer for couple of hours/month. I >>> am Courier user +1 Although I use Debian (but not systemd) I always compiled Courier from sources, so I know very little of Courier's Debian-specific stuff. >>> Though I've never used Debian's source/build infrastructure. Ditto, almost. >> That's very encouraging. I am less experienced with Debian packaging than >> you so I'm not sure I can do much to help. It looks like ra...@linuxia.de >> has retired from the original Debian packages and Ondřej put in an amazing >> effort to re-package the latest source to run under the "courier" user >> instead of the previous "daemon" user (more in line with original source). > > Yeah I had too little time to continue with maintaining such a large package > on my own. I certainly appreciate Ondřej's support and I could help out > with the Debian specifics of this package. I'm not clear whether Ondřej's changes break compatibility with the current package. If aiming at an incompatible repackaging, dropping the existing packages and creating new ones can be easier. Call it /renaming/ if you like. Pros. Renaming makes it clear that some work is needed to migrate to the new packages. Custom scripts will have to be reviewed, for example. Bugs don't need to be migrated, perhaps. Cons. Sense of discontinuity. Panic? >> Some discussion on ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com might dig up some >> more support and help determine if Ondřejs' packages could replace the >> current way-to-old barely-on-life-support package set. I propose interested Ubuntu users subscribe here. I reckon subscribers of this list, even if not interested in Debian packaging, are more likely to occasionally lend some interest on the subject than subscribers of Ububtu- or Debian- devel who are not interested in Courier or mail. Am I wrong? >>> Two things: >>> The package has no git source https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/courier.html >>> Courier upstream has no bug-tracking system. >>> >>> I would choose GitHub as a place to store /debian and to communicate >>> with upstream. >> >> Unfortunately Sam doesn't seem interested in moving his whole development >> system over to Github. > > We could also use the existing Git infrastructure of Debian for the packaging > files (https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit). Is that the "Importing upstream as tarballs" thing? Ale -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
On 12/11/2016 03:12 AM, Mark Constable wrote: > On 11/12/16 03:09, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: >> On 07/12/16 00:04, Ondřej Surý wrote: >>> I have filled RFH (Request for Help) bug on courier package, but >>> nobody responded so far. Today I have changed that to RFA (Request >>> for Adoption) and I intend to properly orphan the packages before >>> stretch release and remove them from next Debian stable release. >>> Well, unless somebody comes up and makes a hard promise to take >>> care of all Courier MTA till Debian stretch (next stable) >>> end-of-life and becomes maintainers. > > This was one of the saddest emails I have ever received. > > If my servers ran Archlinux I'd have no problem building from source, > and even maintaining a source package in AUR, but even though I am a > staunch ubuntu-server user I really don't like debs (or rpm) packaging. > > I have little choice left but to start testing postfix/dovecot :-( > > And so far I really despise what I see after becoming so comfortable > with courier. No SNI (SSL on a single IP) for a start and goodness > knows what else will be awkward to impossible to achieve compared to > the relative ease and unified sanity of the courier suite. > > And not least of all the superb effort put in by Sam, and others, on > this list to provide a level of consistent free support rarely seen > elsewhere (in my experience.) > >> I could lend a hand to the maintainer for couple of hours/month. I >> am Courier user and I am able to put together simple, lintian-free >> packages >> >> https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/tree/master/security/myattackers-ipsets/ipset-persistent/debian >> >> Though I've never used Debian's source/build infrastructure. > > That's very encouraging. I am less experienced with Debian packaging than > you so I'm not sure I can do much to help. It looks like ra...@linuxia.de > has retired from the original Debian packages and Ondřej put in an amazing > effort to re-package the latest source to run under the "courier" user > instead of the previous "daemon" user (more in line with original source). > Yeah I had too little time to continue with maintaining such a large package on my own. I certainly appreciate Ondřej's support and I could help out with the Debian specifics of this package. BTW: Even if you don't want to work on packaging - you could still help testing changes, Mark :-). > Some discussion on ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com might dig up some > more support and help determine if Ondřejs' packages could replace the > current way-to-old barely-on-life-support package set. > >> Two things: >> The package has no git source https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/courier.html >> Courier upstream has no bug-tracking system. >> >> I would choose GitHub as a place to store /debian and to communicate >> with upstream. > > Unfortunately Sam doesn't seem interested in moving his whole development > system over to Github. We could also use the existing Git infrastructure of Debian for the packaging files (https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit). Regards Racke > > -- > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi > ___ > courier-users mailing list > courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users > -- Ecommerce and Linux consulting + Perl and web application programming. Debian and Sympa administration. -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
On 11/12/16 03:09, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: > On 07/12/16 00:04, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> I have filled RFH (Request for Help) bug on courier package, but >> nobody responded so far. Today I have changed that to RFA (Request >> for Adoption) and I intend to properly orphan the packages before >> stretch release and remove them from next Debian stable release. >> Well, unless somebody comes up and makes a hard promise to take >> care of all Courier MTA till Debian stretch (next stable) >> end-of-life and becomes maintainers. This was one of the saddest emails I have ever received. If my servers ran Archlinux I'd have no problem building from source, and even maintaining a source package in AUR, but even though I am a staunch ubuntu-server user I really don't like debs (or rpm) packaging. I have little choice left but to start testing postfix/dovecot :-( And so far I really despise what I see after becoming so comfortable with courier. No SNI (SSL on a single IP) for a start and goodness knows what else will be awkward to impossible to achieve compared to the relative ease and unified sanity of the courier suite. And not least of all the superb effort put in by Sam, and others, on this list to provide a level of consistent free support rarely seen elsewhere (in my experience.) > I could lend a hand to the maintainer for couple of hours/month. I > am Courier user and I am able to put together simple, lintian-free > packages > > https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/tree/master/security/myattackers-ipsets/ipset-persistent/debian > > Though I've never used Debian's source/build infrastructure. That's very encouraging. I am less experienced with Debian packaging than you so I'm not sure I can do much to help. It looks like ra...@linuxia.de has retired from the original Debian packages and Ondřej put in an amazing effort to re-package the latest source to run under the "courier" user instead of the previous "daemon" user (more in line with original source). Some discussion on ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com might dig up some more support and help determine if Ondřejs' packages could replace the current way-to-old barely-on-life-support package set. > Two things: > The package has no git source https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/courier.html > Courier upstream has no bug-tracking system. > > I would choose GitHub as a place to store /debian and to communicate > with upstream. Unfortunately Sam doesn't seem interested in moving his whole development system over to Github. -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
Hello Courier users! I could lend a hand to the maintainer for couple of hours/month. I am Courier user and I am able to put together simple, lintian-free packages https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/tree/master/security/myattackers-ipsets/ipset-persistent/debian Though I've never used Debian's source/build infrastructure. Two things: The package has no git source https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/courier.html Courier upstream has no bug-tracking system. I would choose GitHub as a place to store /debian and to communicate with upstream. Idézem/Quoting Mark Constable: > Apologies if this is a repost but I couldn't find it in the > courier-users@ archives. > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:04:59 +0100 > From: Ondřej Surý > To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Willi Mann , > courier-i...@lists.sourceforge.net > CC: Mark Constable > > Hi, > > TL;DR I am looking for prospective courier-mta maintainers for Courier > MTA packages. > > a little history - Mark Constable asked me a while ago if I could > prepare updated Courier MTA packages for Ubuntu PPA. As a part of that I > whipped the courier-authlib, courier-unicode and courier packages up to > modern Debian packages standard and did some more improvements to the > packaging (as privilege separation on separate 'courier' user). I also > merged non-TLS and TLS versions and did some more changes (most of it > could be found in debian/changelog and/or in git log). > > I did my best to break as little things as possible, but the changes to > the packages were massive. There's one problem though - I am not active > Courier MTA user, so I can do my best from Debian point of view, but I > am unable to do any extensive testing. > > Therefore I am looking for active Courier MTA users that happen to be > either Debian Developers, Debian Maintainers, or just people that would > be happy to learn the Debian Packaging - I would be more than happy to > provide guidance in such case. > > I have filled RFH (Request for Help) bug on courier package, but nobody > responded so far. Today I have changed that to RFA (Request for > Adoption) and I intend to properly orphan the packages before stretch > release and remove them from next Debian stable release. Well, unless > somebody comes up and makes a hard promise to take care of all Courier > MTA till Debian stretch (next stable) end-of-life and becomes > maintainers. > > Please note that the bug list on src:courier is rather long: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no=courier > (143 filled bugs) and it will need some time to comb through the list, > close the non-issues, fix the Debian related bugs and forward the > appropriate bugs to upstream. I would suggest it might be better this > would be a team effort. > > Cheers, > -- > Ondřej Surý > > > -- > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi > ___ > courier-users mailing list > courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users SZÉPE Viktor https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md -- +36-20-4242498 s...@szepe.net skype: szepe.viktor Budapest, III. kerület -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages
Apologies if this is a repost but I couldn't find it in the courier-users@ archives. Forwarded Message Subject: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:04:59 +0100 From: Ondřej SurýTo: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Willi Mann , courier-i...@lists.sourceforge.net CC: Mark Constable Hi, TL;DR I am looking for prospective courier-mta maintainers for Courier MTA packages. a little history - Mark Constable asked me a while ago if I could prepare updated Courier MTA packages for Ubuntu PPA. As a part of that I whipped the courier-authlib, courier-unicode and courier packages up to modern Debian packages standard and did some more improvements to the packaging (as privilege separation on separate 'courier' user). I also merged non-TLS and TLS versions and did some more changes (most of it could be found in debian/changelog and/or in git log). I did my best to break as little things as possible, but the changes to the packages were massive. There's one problem though - I am not active Courier MTA user, so I can do my best from Debian point of view, but I am unable to do any extensive testing. Therefore I am looking for active Courier MTA users that happen to be either Debian Developers, Debian Maintainers, or just people that would be happy to learn the Debian Packaging - I would be more than happy to provide guidance in such case. I have filled RFH (Request for Help) bug on courier package, but nobody responded so far. Today I have changed that to RFA (Request for Adoption) and I intend to properly orphan the packages before stretch release and remove them from next Debian stable release. Well, unless somebody comes up and makes a hard promise to take care of all Courier MTA till Debian stretch (next stable) end-of-life and becomes maintainers. Please note that the bug list on src:courier is rather long: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no=courier (143 filled bugs) and it will need some time to comb through the list, close the non-issues, fix the Debian related bugs and forward the appropriate bugs to upstream. I would suggest it might be better this would be a team effort. Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: Cron <root@szerver4> /usr/local/sbin/syslog-errors-infrequent.sh
Hello! Could you help me where is the syntax error in this address? Jun 6 21:39:09 szerver4 courieresmtpd: error,relay=:::195.228.245.161,from=: 517 Syntax error. AFAIK this is a very high volume newsletter. Thanks. SZÉPE Viktor -- +36-20-4242498 s...@szepe.net skype: szepe.viktor Budapest, III. kerület -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] (fwd)
This is a development build of _courier_, _courier-imap_, _sqwebmail_, _maildrop_, and _cone_ packages. Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php The custom implementation of unicode-based character set mapping tables has been replaced by an iconv(3)-based implementation. This release also includes a major upgrade to sqwebmail that includes better support for flowed-format text, and a new search function. == Backwards compatibility and upgrade notes * The format of the autoreplies has changed. Autoreply content must now use flowed-text markup. This affects mailbot and the equivalent autoreply feature in sqwebmail. Existing mailbot autoreply files need to be edit and reformatted as flowed text. Ditto for autoreplies set up in sqwebmail. They need to be opened, and edited so that the only linebreaks occur between paragraphs. Additionally, the autoreply text in sqwebmail is now saved in UTF-8; existing autoreplies may need to be transcoded manually. * When using sqwebmail to generate HTML text, the markup for generating text headings has slightly changed. * Saved message signatures are now also saved in the UTF-8 character set, to get more consistent behavior when switching browser codings. Existing message signatures may have to be recoded. * Site-specific message footer files, in the html/LANG directory, must now be coded in UTF-8, and use the format=flowed, delsp=yes text format, as per RFC 3676. * Slight semantical difference in processing of signatures and footers. A signature, if specified, will no longer appear in the editable text area, but get automatically added to the message, upon submission. The signature will also be shown when previewing the message. * A site-specific message footer file, if installed, will also be shown when previewing the message. == Other, general changes: * sqwebmail and Cone can now process mail coded in any character set that's supported by the system iconv(3) library, not just a few dozen character sets that used to be built into the codebase. This is true, of course, only if the browser or the terminal display supports UTF-8. Similarly Courier- IMAP now accepts search queries encoded in any character set known to iconv(3). * This is due to the replacement of the internal character set and unicode library, that predates the standardization of iconv(3). The new iconv(3)- based API is completely different than the previous library API. The only remaining bits of code are mapping function that case-convert character data, as well as compute character width (there's no analogous functionality in iconv(3)). This is augmented by new implementation of unicode grapheme breaking and line breaking algorithms. * Translating and mapping between different character sets is core functionality; from converting email content, in sqwebmail and Cone, to client's character set, to parsing i18n data from various mail headers (which have several different character set and language encoding formats as well), to searching and sorting messages, by sqwebmail, Cone, or the IMAP server. Most the impact from the rewrite should hopefully go unnoticed, aside from the larger character set universe known to sqwebmail, Cone, and Courier-IMAP. * There's a new search box at the bottom of the folder index page. sqwebmail searches the messages in the order of their appearance on the folder index screen. The search starts with the first message on the folder index screen. If the folder index screen does not start with the first message in the folder, the previous messages are not searched, and the search stops when enough messages with the search string are found to fill one folder index screen. In this manner, a poorly chosen search string that finds a hit in a lot of messages will limit itself. If necessary, the search can be repeated after navigating the folder index screen to the starting point for the second search. * Up to four occurrences of the search string in each message are shown on the search results page. * Word wrapping rules in sqwebmail now use unicode line break rules, rather than simple word wrapping on whitespace. This should improve sqwebmail's word wrap with non-Western languages. * Suppress logging the contents of a failed AUTH command in syslog, in case it includes encoded passwords. * Fix requirements of rpm spec files, to depend on /etc/cron.hourly, rather than a specific cron package. * Adjust indentation to avoid parts of DSNs unintentionally interpreted as quoted content. * mailbot now generates flowed text-formatted replies. -- pgpifw22R6efa.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future.
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Re: Auth daemon memory leak.
Hi, And my mail refused due to attachment, so I posted it here: http://www.kovoks.nl/authdaemond.log.gz Tom Albers KovoKs B.V. KvK: 1104 Citeren Tom Albers t...@kovoks.nl: Forward to mailing list since I received no reaction yet Best, Tom Albers KovoKs B.V. KvK: 1104 - Doorgestuurd bericht van t...@kovoks.nl - Datum: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 23:34:33 +0200 Van: Tom Albers t...@kovoks.nl Antwoorden aan:Tom Albers t...@kovoks.nl Onderwerp: Re: [courier-users] Auth daemon memory leak. Aan: Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com Quoting Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com: Tom Albers writes: Sam, Attached is the logfile. I hope it is useful. Sorry, I made a small mistake. I forgot that $sbindir/authdaemond is a shell wrapper script, not the real binary that ends up running in the background. Please rollback the change, and edit the authdaemond script itself. Replace exec ${sbindir}/courierlogger -pid=/var/spool/authdaemon/pid $LOGGEROPTS -$1 /usr/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond with ${sbindir}/courierlogger -pid=/var/spool/authdaemon/pid $LOGGEROPTS -$1 valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes --log-file=/tmp/authdaemond.log.$$ /usr/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond This is one line. Hopefully this'll do the trick. After starting authdaemond and replicating the problem, make a copy of the log file before stopping authdaemond. You'll need to stop it by killing the process, rather then executing the stop command -- because of the way valgrind gets shoved into the pipeline, the regular stop command won't work. By having the pid appended to the generated log filename /tmp/authdaemond.log.$$ this will prevent anything useful from being overwritten if the wrapper script gets executed again, by mistake. You can either mail the logs to me, or post it somewhere I can grab if my spam filters bounce it, rather than posting the whole thing to the list. Hi, Thanks for the help. I had to improvise a bit to get the log, i've seen that multiple processes has logged in the log unfortunately, but I hope that's not that crucial for the analysis. See attachment. Met vriendelijke groet, Tom Albers KovoKs B.V. KvK: 1104 - Dit mailtje is verstuurd vanaf de server van KovoKs. http://www.kovoks.nl - Einde doorgestuurd bericht - - Dit mailtje is verstuurd vanaf de server van KovoKs. http://www.kovoks.nl - Dit mailtje is verstuurd vanaf de server van KovoKs. http://www.kovoks.nl -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: forwarding broken after migration to courier]
Forgot to include the list... Incoming mail would be handled over SMTP, most probably, so Postfix would be the daemon to handle the .forward file. Khosrow Ebrahimpour wrote: On 19 November 2008 02:08, Sam Varshavchik wrote: If this was working before, than you were not using Courier. That's correct we were not running courier previously, According to the above, you are running Postfix, not Courier. I wasn't clear in the previous post, the envrionment runs postfix for SMTP and courier for IMAP whereas previously we were running sendmail and cyrus for the same purpose. The best way to get help for your problem, is to be able to clearly explain what your problem is. Even after reading your message several times, it's still not clear whether you're running Courier, or Postfix, or whatever, and what exactly is not working. Without understanding what exactly your situation is, nobody will be able to offer much help to you. It appears that I may be in the wrong forum for this specific problem. But I would appreciate if you guys could help guide me in the right direction. Given our setup (Courier for imap and Postfix for smtp), when new email comes in which application is responsible for parsing the .forward file and executing its insturctions? Cheers, /Khosrow - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: How to identify mails sent to an alias]
It seems that this didn't end up going to the list Original Message Without modifying the courier-mta package that comes in Debian stable, I have a VERY effective solution to alias use and determining which email was sent to whom. In my setup I have a MySQL database as my backend for authdaemon, courier-{mta,imap} set to use maildir format. My database fields are username, domain, crypt, clear, name, uid, gid and home. username and domain are combined to give a valid email address for receiving email to (was needed to be two fields to allow [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be separate from [EMAIL PROTECTED]). crypt and clear define the password as either MD5 hash or cleartext. home defines the mailbox to drop the email in to. All email accounts are purely virtual from the OS view-points and therefore uid and gid are constant for all fields - they are the uid and gid that courier runs as. In my authdaemon configuration I do NOT allow NULL passwords for logging in. Therefore: 1) to create a new address is just a matter of entering a row of data in to the DB - alias addresses do not have a password defined, real addresses do. The home field in alias addresses is set to match the real address' home field. crypt, clear and name are optional fields and usually I don't set them to anything. 2) any username with a password defined in crypt or clear can log in and check email, all others are denied access. 3) as the MTA only cares about username and domain pairings, they are all seen as real addresses by it and therefore are what actually appears in the logs. 4) I only need to check 1 account for email, namely the real address. 5) Setting up mail filtering/sorting within my email client is easy - base it on the To: header, which doesn't change anywhere along the way. HTH. Cheers, Tim Lyth - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: Can't login to IMAP: pass MySQL authentication, permission denied
Hi all, I installed courier-imap-4.3.1 i with rpm built as vmail. Then i filed to login (as virtual user stored in MySQL) to IMAP. Here's my maillog: Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 imapd: Connection, ip=[:::203.125.189.34] Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 authdaemond: received auth request, service=imap, authtype=login Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 authdaemond: authmysql: trying this module Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 authdaemond: SQL query: SELECT email, passwd, clear, uid, gid, homedir, maildir, quota, name, FROM users WHERE email = [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND (postfix = 'y') Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 authdaemond: password matches successfully Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 authdaemond: authmysql: sysusername=null, sysuserid=5000, sysgroupid=5000, homedir=/opt/mail, [EMAIL PROTECTED], fullname=Test Info, maildir=/opt/mail/nama.domain.com/info, quota=25000S, options=null Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 authdaemond: Authenticated: sysusername=null, sysuserid=5000, sysgroupid=5000, homedir=/opt/mail, [EMAIL PROTECTED], fullname=Test Info, maildir=/opt/mail/nama.domain.com/info, quota=25000S, options=null Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 imapd: chdir /opt/mail/nama.domain.com/info: Permission denied As the log said, i passed mysql authentication and the problem is the file permission. Inside /opt/mail/ has permission *00 (700 for folders and 600 for the files) and they're all belongs to vmail.vmail. I think this is a standard file permission as it stated on almost courier-imap manual / tutorial. The question is, 1. What should i check? What's wrong? 2. Even if i give the read and write permission to the user's maildir (and its domain), i still couldn't login to IMAP. The email client said login failed. Strangely, there's no more Permission denied error in the maillog, it's just stop until the authdaemond: Authenticated:. I couldn't find any clue / report from other logs (messages, debug log). Can anyone explain the situation and the real problem here? 3. I chat with someone in freenode. He said, I suspect there is a problem with the user that the imap daemon is trying to read it as. the virtual user, perhaps the imap daemon is not using the correct username to do it. Is it true? What should i check? What's the solution? FYI, I'm using CentOS 5 and my SELinux was Permissive. Changing it to Disabled also don't help. I search the web for similar situation, still don't find the solution. Please help me. I'm lost here. Regards, Adinda P - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: authmysql vs apostrophe]
Sorry, sent this direct instead of to the list. Original Message Subject: Re: [courier-users] authmysql vs apostrophe From:Matt Comer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Fri, March 14, 2008 11:19 am To: Martin Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Apostrophes in SQL are a no-no and can be used for SQL injection attacks. Example: someone sends an email to your server at user';delete * from users; Voiala, there goes your users table! I'm not surprised to see that authmysql is stripping these characters. Escaping is an option. However, not all RDBMSs escape such especial characters the same way, so that can be problematic. Matt quote who=Martin Strand I've got usernames with apostrophes (don't ask me why, people are strange) but they don't seem to work well with authmysql - the apostrophes are replaced with spaces in the mysql query: imapd: Connection, ip=[:::127.0.0.1] authd: received auth request, service=imap, authtype=login authd: authmysql: trying this module authd: SQL query: SELECT email, , clear, uid, gid, home, maildir, quota, , FROM users WHERE email = info [EMAIL PROTECTED] authd: zero rows returned authd: no password available to compare authd: authmysql: REJECT - try next module authd: FAIL, all modules rejected imapd: LOGIN FAILED, user=info'[EMAIL PROTECTED], ip=[:::127.0.0.1] imapd: Disconnected, ip=[:::127.0.0.1], time=5 Is there anything I can do to prevent this? Are there other characters that don't work with authmysql? I should mention that I'm using the rather old courier-authlib-0.58 and courier-imap-4.1.0. One possible workaround would be: MYSQL_LOGIN_FIELD replace(email, ', ) but that feels rather hacky so I'd rather not do it. Thanks, Martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: authmysql vs apostrophe]
It should be up to authmysql to escape its input in order to prevent SQL injection. I doubt escaping differs much between different rdbms, but authmysql only supports mysql so that's not an issue. Postfix is using the same table and does not have a problem with apostrophes. I'll just add that hacky workaround for now. Martin On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:22:49 +0100, Matt Comer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apostrophes in SQL are a no-no and can be used for SQL injection attacks. Example: someone sends an email to your server at user';delete * from users; Voiala, there goes your users table! I'm not surprised to see that authmysql is stripping these characters. Escaping is an option. However, not all RDBMSs escape such especial characters the same way, so that can be problematic. Matt quote who=Martin Strand I've got usernames with apostrophes (don't ask me why, people are strange) but they don't seem to work well with authmysql - the apostrophes are replaced with spaces in the mysql query: imapd: Connection, ip=[:::127.0.0.1] authd: received auth request, service=imap, authtype=login authd: authmysql: trying this module authd: SQL query: SELECT email, , clear, uid, gid, home, maildir, quota, , FROM users WHERE email = info [EMAIL PROTECTED] authd: zero rows returned authd: no password available to compare authd: authmysql: REJECT - try next module authd: FAIL, all modules rejected imapd: LOGIN FAILED, user=info'[EMAIL PROTECTED], ip=[:::127.0.0.1] imapd: Disconnected, ip=[:::127.0.0.1], time=5 Is there anything I can do to prevent this? Are there other characters that don't work with authmysql? I should mention that I'm using the rather old courier-authlib-0.58 and courier-imap-4.1.0. One possible workaround would be: MYSQL_LOGIN_FIELD replace(email, ', ) but that feels rather hacky so I'd rather not do it. Thanks, Martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
tovis wrote: I can send/receive receive faxes - front end is apache2 and squirrelmail. For now I have stucked on faxmail. I was deleted the first line from default configuration file /etc/courier/faxrc (rw^ . 1), and check for faxmail, as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but result was an SMTP 513 error. to field is the same as I used for sending email, from field is [EMAIL PROTECTED] - lookup from syslog. Do you have FAXRELAYCLIENT? - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
On 08 Mar 2008 19:30, tovis wrote: Do you have FAXRELAYCLIENT? Aha! May be this is the missing chain? I'm using Debian (latest stable), which provide me prebuilded packages, what are easy to install and configure. But some times (recommended mta for Debian is exim4) there are some informations skipped. I have no /etc/courier/smtpacces directory at all, I have an /etc/courier/smtpacces.dat - I have been checked it, but I do not now how to convert it back to human readable format. Do you know how to do it? - I'm afraid that whitout the source of smtpacces.dat file I can not recreate it expanded with FAXRELAYCLIENT which I need. Perhaps try a... apt-get install --reinstall courier-mta # dpkg -L courier-mta | grep smtpaccess /etc/courier/smtpaccess /etc/courier/smtpaccess/default /usr/share/man/man8/makesmtpaccess.8.gz /usr/lib/courier/makesmtpaccess /usr/share/man/man8/makesmtpaccess-msa.8.gz /usr/sbin/makesmtpaccess-msa /usr/sbin/makesmtpaccess --markc - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
On 08 Mar 2008 19:30, tovis wrote: Do you have FAXRELAYCLIENT? Aha! May be this is the missing chain? I'm using Debian (latest stable), which provide me prebuilded packages, what are easy to install and configure. But some times (recommended mta for Debian is exim4) there are some informations skipped. I have no /etc/courier/smtpacces directory at all, I have an /etc/courier/smtpacces.dat - I have been checked it, but I do not now how to convert it back to human readable format. Do you know how to do it? - I'm afraid that whitout the source of smtpacces.dat file I can not recreate it expanded with FAXRELAYCLIENT which I need. Perhaps try a... apt-get install --reinstall courier-mta # dpkg -L courier-mta | grep smtpaccess /etc/courier/smtpaccess /etc/courier/smtpaccess/default /usr/share/man/man8/makesmtpaccess.8.gz /usr/lib/courier/makesmtpaccess /usr/share/man/man8/makesmtpaccess-msa.8.gz /usr/sbin/makesmtpaccess-msa /usr/sbin/makesmtpaccess --markc OK! You win! Same on me, I have directory /etc/courier/smtpaccess with a file called default supplied by author. It contain a raw 127.0.0.1 allow,RELAYCLIENT I create a new file in this directory called default-fax and include only one raw for faxing: 127.0.0.1 allow.FAXRELAYCLIENT run makesmtpaccess but it gives me error Cannot store record for 127.0.0.1 - duplicate or out of disk space. How should look like FAXRELAYCLIENT? - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Finally I succeed to send using email gateway :D Thank you Mark! - you turn me to the right way. There are some miscellanouse configurations to do, but finally it do what I'm awaiting for. I should say, that if I was read the hole documentation I should be gues this, but from other point I simply does not falmiliar with email service and logic of moving emails through it especially the way as courier do it. Again thanks a lot! On 08 Mar 2008 19:30, tovis wrote: Do you have FAXRELAYCLIENT? Aha! May be this is the missing chain? I'm using Debian (latest stable), which provide me prebuilded packages, what are easy to install and configure. But some times (recommended mta for Debian is exim4) there are some informations skipped. I have no /etc/courier/smtpacces directory at all, I have an /etc/courier/smtpacces.dat - I have been checked it, but I do not now how to convert it back to human readable format. Do you know how to do it? - I'm afraid that whitout the source of smtpacces.dat file I can not recreate it expanded with FAXRELAYCLIENT which I need. Perhaps try a... apt-get install --reinstall courier-mta # dpkg -L courier-mta | grep smtpaccess /etc/courier/smtpaccess /etc/courier/smtpaccess/default /usr/share/man/man8/makesmtpaccess.8.gz /usr/lib/courier/makesmtpaccess /usr/share/man/man8/makesmtpaccess-msa.8.gz /usr/sbin/makesmtpaccess-msa /usr/sbin/makesmtpaccess --markc - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
On 08 Mar 2008 21:23, tovis wrote: I create a new file in this directory called default-fax and include only one raw for faxing: 127.0.0.1 allow.FAXRELAYCLIENT run makesmtpaccess but it gives me error Cannot store record for 127.0.0.1 - duplicate or out of disk space. How should look like FAXRELAYCLIENT? I've never used couriers fax utilities but I would asssume it would be something like this in /etc/courier/smtpaccess/default #127.0.0.1TABallow,RELAYCLIENT 127.0.0.1TABallow,FAXRELAYCLIENT Yes! Sorry I was so happy that I forgot the right entry: 127.0.0.1TABallow,RELAYCLIENT,FAXRELAYCLIENT That solved my problem. The README.Debian is talking about that fax facility should be enabled by root, and go to talk about faxrc which is quite unusual configuration script, and do not talk about relaying - I think for package manager it was obviouse. But as I wrote before the courier is not counted in the list of recommended mta's and configuration and setup is not so fined as for them :( where TAB means a real tab character. Test it and look at the logs to see how much further you may, or not, get. --markc - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
On 08 Mar 2008 21:23, tovis wrote: I create a new file in this directory called default-fax and include only one raw for faxing: 127.0.0.1 allow.FAXRELAYCLIENT run makesmtpaccess but it gives me error Cannot store record for 127.0.0.1 - duplicate or out of disk space. How should look like FAXRELAYCLIENT? I've never used couriers fax utilities but I would asssume it would be something like this in /etc/courier/smtpaccess/default #127.0.0.1TABallow,RELAYCLIENT 127.0.0.1TABallow,FAXRELAYCLIENT where TAB means a real tab character. Test it and look at the logs to see how much further you may, or not, get. --markc - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Am 2008-03-03 10:56:19, schrieb tovis: Lookup Debian refernce (9.6.1): ... use exim in Woody and use exim4 in Sarge. ... The only reasonable alternative MTA is postfix if you care about security sendmail and gmail are available as Debain packages but are not recommended: How to understand it? - no Courier counted at all, as it does not exist, but is it also reside in prebuild package. I'm a user, I have not got enough information about security of that or other packages. Please note, that there is currently a rewrite of the debian-reference. Sorry, my english is terrible, I do not understand. Courier's faxmail is dependent on courier-mta in Debian package. It's clean that courier-faxmail is relay on courier-mta. My problem that courier-mta + courier-imap + courier-faxmail has much more setup/config to do as apache2 (for exmple), a lots of configuration files, no clean step Not realy... It has only 10 files to configure 10 options... No need to search a 40 kByte config file for the right option... Please read 'man courier' where all files are described on-by-one. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 +49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi +33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Am 2008-03-03 10:56:19, schrieb tovis: Lookup Debian refernce (9.6.1): ... use exim in Woody and use exim4 in Sarge. ... The only reasonable alternative MTA is postfix if you care about security sendmail and gmail are available as Debain packages but are not recommended: How to understand it? - no Courier counted at all, as it does not exist, but is it also reside in prebuild package. I'm a user, I have not got enough information about security of that or other packages. Please note, that there is currently a rewrite of the debian-reference. OK. I decided to use against this discouriged reference. Sorry, my english is terrible, I do not understand. Courier's faxmail is dependent on courier-mta in Debian package. It's clean that courier-faxmail is relay on courier-mta. My problem that courier-mta + courier-imap + courier-faxmail has much more setup/config to do as apache2 (for exmple), a lots of configuration files, no clean step Not realy... It has only 10 files to configure 10 options... No need to search a 40 kByte config file for the right option... Please read 'man courier' where all files are described on-by-one. From those time, with some help I managed to configure smarthost, simply creating /etc/courier/esmtproutes contain only one raw :mail.chello.hu After this I've set I can send emails. Installed fetchmail, to collect mails from different providers. Here was only one problem, which were solved using smtphost - which was identical to /etc/courier/defaultdomain is contain. I can send/receive receive faxes - front end is apache2 and squirrelmail. For now I have stucked on faxmail. I was deleted the first line from default configuration file /etc/courier/faxrc (rw^ . 1), and check for faxmail, as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but result was an SMTP 513 error. to field is the same as I used for sending email, from field is [EMAIL PROTECTED] - lookup from syslog. What I've should set for faxmail? Is it not a real domain, it's some kind of route which is on localhost. I'm strugling on documentation but I found nothing about fax domain. Usually Debian packages are coming well preinstalled, may be the problem is /etc/courier/esmtproutes what I've set to everiything to my smarthost? Any ideas would be apretiated. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 +49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi +33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: how to whitelist rbl blacklisted e-mail]
This was obviously intended to the list Original Message Subject:Re: [courier-users] how to whitelist rbl blacklisted e-mail Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:35:33 -0200 From: Enrique Verdes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alessandro Vesely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alessandro Vesely wrote: Jay Lee wrote: While this would technically solve the problem, it's not a very good long term solution IMHO. It would require him to keep up with all the IP Addresses Google Apps uses to send out email not to mention Hotmail and Yahoo, who wants to do that? The problem is, so far, two different IP addresses are blocked, but don't know how many actually are. Have to wait for a mail to bounce to update the whitelist with a new IP is not an option. Following advice from Jay Lee and after checking that the dsbl.net rbl wasn't blocking anything (apart from google addresses) I opted for disabling it from my config. Thanks all for your comments. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
On 3.3.2008 21:10, tovis wrote: I can not find even where I should put smarthost! Google smarthost courier. Reveals for example this jewel: http://archiver.mailfighter.net/courier-users/2007/Sep-Oct/0053.html Really nice! But I have no any files in /etc/courier called esmtproutes! Can stop courier-uucp? - I1m not sure but it seem to me unneeded. esa - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, tovis wrote: On 3.3.2008 21:10, tovis wrote: I can not find even where I should put smarthost! Google smarthost courier. Reveals for example this jewel: http://archiver.mailfighter.net/courier-users/2007/Sep-Oct/0053.html Really nice! But I have no any files in /etc/courier called esmtproutes! Then create one with your favorite text editor. This file is usually not installed with package or from source. If all other courier configuration files are in /etc/courier, this is the way to go. [ snip ] Milan -- This address is used only for mailing list response. Do not send any personal messages to it, use milan in address instead. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
After setting of smarthost, I have used one of my e-mail address, send a test. Thus is the result: UNDELIVERABLE MAIL Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fmx.freemail.hu [195.228.245.2]: 554-ironport2.freemail.hu 554 Your access to this mail system has been rejected due to the sending MTA's poor reputation. If you believe that this failure is in error, please contact the intended recipient via alternate means. For me it's sounds that it is not sended through smarthost :(, is not it? - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Am 2008-02-28 11:20:33, schrieb tovis: - Eredeti üzenet - Tárgy: courier is good for me? Feladó: tovis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dátum: Csü, Február 28, 2008 11:19 Címzett: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I'm running a small SOHO (about 20 users for now), based on a server, running Debian stable with usuall services - samba, apache2 and PostgreSQL. I'm using exim4 (as mta), courier-imap and squirrelmail, for reliable, Why do you use exim as MTA? I run on all of my servers Debian GNU/Linux Etch 4.0 and with courier-mta and courier-imap and it is configured in a very short time. For now I need FAX service, and I found that courier has faxmail module, but it need courier mta. I have been start struggling on courier Please fill a bugreport and telle the Maintainer he should use Depends: mail-transport-agent | courier-mta which mean, courier-fax will a preinstalled MTA or if it does not exist suck courier-mta as dependencie. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 +49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi +33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2008-02-28 11:20:33, schrieb tovis: - Eredeti üzenet - Tárgy: courier is good for me? Feladó: tovis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dátum: Csü, Február 28, 2008 11:19 Címzett: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I'm running a small SOHO (about 20 users for now), based on a server, running Debian stable with usuall services - samba, apache2 and PostgreSQL. I'm using exim4 (as mta), courier-imap and squirrelmail, for reliable, Why do you use exim as MTA? I run on all of my servers Debian GNU/Linux Etch 4.0 and with courier-mta and courier-imap and it is configured in a very short time. For now I need FAX service, and I found that courier has faxmail module, but it need courier mta. I have been start struggling on courier Please fill a bugreport and telle the Maintainer he should use Depends: mail-transport-agent | courier-mta which mean, courier-fax will a preinstalled MTA or if it does not exist suck courier-mta as dependencie. I doubt that Courier's faxmail module works with any other MTA besides Courier. Regards Racke -- LinuXia Systems = http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP = http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
I'm running a small SOHO (about 20 users for now), based on a server, running Debian stable with usuall services - samba, apache2 and PostgreSQL. I'm using exim4 (as mta), courier-imap and squirrelmail, for reliable, Why do you use exim as MTA? I run on all of my servers Debian GNU/Linux Etch 4.0 and with courier-mta and courier-imap and it is configured in a very short time. For now I need FAX service, and I found that courier has faxmail module, but it need courier mta. I have been start struggling on courier Please fill a bugreport and telle the Maintainer he should use Depends: mail-transport-agent | courier-mta which mean, courier-fax will a preinstalled MTA or if it does not exist suck courier-mta as dependencie. I doubt that Courier's faxmail module works with any other MTA besides Courier. Regards Racke I'm sure that Courier's faxmail won't work with exim4 MTA. My problem that I'm not so mauch familiar with mail servers, and documentation on http://www.courier-mta.org/install.html is about manuall installation of the Coutier server - a complex full featured mailserver, what I'm do not need. This documentation quite frighten me, and I'm try to get some information that do it will good for me to go through this long installation procedure, to have a simple, smarthost based mta. I know that Debian prebuilded Courier's IMAP server is very simple to setup/configure, as the exim4 for this purposes also do not need high efforts. By the way I have some answers, which help me to decide that is it should be good for me, need some more efforts for setup than usually. For now I'm modelling the server and realized that Courier mta, imap and faxmail has a lot of configuration files (for first look it's more then apache2), which I need to understand. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
I'm running a small SOHO (about 20 users for now), based on a server, running Debian stable with usuall services - samba, apache2 and PostgreSQL. I'm using exim4 (as mta), courier-imap and squirrelmail, for reliable, Why do you use exim as MTA? Lookup Debian refernce (9.6.1): ... use exim in Woody and use exim4 in Sarge. ... The only reasonable alternative MTA is postfix if you care about security sendmail and gmail are available as Debain packages but are not recommended: How to understand it? - no Courier counted at all, as it does not exist, but is it also reside in prebuild package. I'm a user, I have not got enough information about security of that or other packages. I run on all of my servers Debian GNU/Linux Etch 4.0 and with courier-mta and courier-imap and it is configured in a very short time. For now I need FAX service, and I found that courier has faxmail module, but it need courier mta. I have been start struggling on courier Please fill a bugreport and telle the Maintainer he should use Depends: mail-transport-agent | courier-mta which mean, courier-fax will a preinstalled MTA or if it does not exist suck courier-mta as dependencie. Sorry, my english is terrible, I do not understand. Courier's faxmail is dependent on courier-mta in Debian package. It's clean that courier-faxmail is relay on courier-mta. My problem that courier-mta + courier-imap + courier-faxmail has much more setup/config to do as apache2 (for exmple), a lots of configuration files, no clean step by step instruction how I need to be setup/config a smarthost based mta, which is (I hope) knows courier IMAP. PS: Generally, in many situations I should trust to this descriptions, because no reliable description of how to check setup/configuration. Tipical example mail delivery subsystems. I'm sure that these checks are much more complex than setup/config itself, and guys from Debian do it, know it, much better and deeper then me. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling -- courier's faxmail was not powerfull enough for my purposes. -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling -- courier's faxmail was not powerfull enough for my purposes. Can I ask why? What are you missed? I'm using Debian Etch - mgetty, mgetty-fax. I found some suspiciouse informations that courier is use netpbm pack - g3topbm and pbmtog3 from that packagedoes not work for mgetty - I checked out. I think it could be worked around. -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
tovis wrote: In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling -- courier's faxmail was not powerfull enough for my purposes. Can I ask why? What are you missed? I needed to send faxes with modems located in different cities. And had only very old computers to handle these modems. And for some reason (do not remember why) I preffered hylafax over mgetty-fax. So, it was more simple to use one central mail/fax server with number of modem-handlers in remote places than to setup network of mail servers what each take care to handle incoming mail, format conversion and modem. -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
tovis wrote: tovis wrote: In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling -- courier's faxmail was not powerfull enough for my purposes. Can I ask why? What are you missed? I needed to send faxes with modems located in different cities. And had only very old computers to handle these modems. And for some reason (do not remember why) I preffered hylafax over mgetty-fax. So, it was more simple to use one central mail/fax server with number of modem-handlers in remote places than to setup network of mail servers what each take care to handle incoming mail, format conversion and modem. Really special situation - if I only understand it well - you have several modems, in several cities, each of them connect to very old boxes, and you built up a server on another place, sending emails to those old boxes which are sends the real faxes - amazing! but possible. All true except I do not send mails to these boxes. Instead hylafax has protocol for submitting faxes to remote boxes. I use it. Your choice is better! - mail delivery protocol is quite an information blackhole. I have choose mgetty, because it is a much more old realization then Hylafax, and seem to me is quite simple. Small amount of configuration files, and practically two apps mgetty and sendfax. Additionally, courier does not use mgetty's spool mechanizm but his own mail pool is used - faxrunqd start/stop daemon script includes some kind of timeout about 60 sec(!) - is it quite painfull for UPS. Fortunatelly my situation is quite simple against this :) I need a FAX server to send faxes from an office, where working about 20 person with different boxes and OS's on them (Windows, Linux). Also need to get faxes (in 99% of situation) from a so small country such as Hungary. This is implemented in Lithuania. And according to wikipedia, Hungary is bigger :) Population: hu 10M, lt 3.4M Area (sq.km): hu 93k, lt 65k Yes, that's it! Some years ago one of my clients bought a a multifunction laser printer/copy/fax from a well known american manufacturer, but from many far places in Hungary they can not receive FAX's, because of the quality of connection - huge/large/small depend on many factors. -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Am Montag, den 03.03.2008, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Aidas Kasparas: tovis wrote: In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling -- courier's faxmail was not powerfull enough for my purposes. Can I ask why? What are you missed? I needed to send faxes with modems located in different cities. And had only very old computers to handle these modems. And for some reason (do not remember why) I preffered hylafax over mgetty-fax. So, it was more simple to use one central mail/fax server with number of modem-handlers in remote places than to setup network of mail servers what each take care to handle incoming mail, format conversion and modem. Good choice. Hylafax comes with 'faxmail' which takes a (mime formatted) email as input. Just have your mta deliver to that program. Hylafax doesn't come with a pdf filter for attachements, but the infrastructure is in place to supply your own. The documentation (man faxmail) should have everything to get you going. I was going to do all that myself, but at the moment I'm too busy. Maybe in a couple of months. For me it's just an academic excersise since I won't use it very often. But it might come handy at some point. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
As I suspected :( I can not find even where I should put smarthost! - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
On 3.3.2008 21:10, tovis wrote: I can not find even where I should put smarthost! Google smarthost courier. Reveals for example this jewel: http://archiver.mailfighter.net/courier-users/2007/Sep-Oct/0053.html esa - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
On 3.3.2008 21:10, tovis wrote: I can not find even where I should put smarthost! Google smarthost courier. Reveals for example this jewel: http://archiver.mailfighter.net/courier-users/2007/Sep-Oct/0053.html Thanx! I will try this. esa - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
- Eredeti üzenet - Tárgy: courier is good for me? Feladó: tovis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dátum: Csü, Február 28, 2008 11:19 Címzett: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I'm running a small SOHO (about 20 users for now), based on a server, running Debian stable with usuall services - samba, apache2 and PostgreSQL. I'm using exim4 (as mta), courier-imap and squirrelmail, for reliable, platform independent mailing system, with some help for group work. I do not want to build a fully featured mail server, I'm using exim4 through smarthost, fetchmail is getting incoming mailes. This configuration works fine for several years, and it was simply to install/configure. For now I need FAX service, and I found that courier has faxmail module, but it need courier mta. I have been start struggling on courier documentation and realized that is it a large and complex mail server package, with a lots of configuration issues and possibilities. Try google to find a more simple setup howto - I do not find any for my situation. May be courier is not good for me? - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Hi. First: I never used the fax module, so I have no clue if this might be what you want. On Thursday 28 February 2008, tovis wrote: I have been start struggling on courier documentation and realized that is it a large and complex mail server package, with a lots of configuration issues and possibilities. Try google to find a more simple setup howto - I do not find any for my situation. May be courier is not good for me? I don't really have much experience with other MTAs, but most parts of the default configuration can be used as-is. Just because many things are possible, this does not mean that you need or want them. The default config will do just fine for many people. Especially if you don't use incoming SMTP (and so don't have to worry about IDENT lookups, blacklist configuration, greylisting or thinks like that). Have a look at http://www.courier-mta.org/install.html. More than half of the chapters are marked OPTIONAL and that is meant like that. :) The sections about configure/make/install (Everything from Preparing for installation up to Post-installation checks) should be obsolete if you have packages from your distro. Can you specify which part of the installation docs is complex if you leave out things you don't need? regards, Bernd -- Only one book has been printed in more copies than The Bible... ...the IKEA catalogue - Song Facts of Life by Lazyboy signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Setup exim4 as a smarthost using mta on Debian called as zero setup. There is small shell/perl questionary ned to answer about ten questions. - using smarthost, incoming emails are coming through SMTP or fetchmail - host name for mail susbsystem - listening interfaces for incoming SMTP connection - no one - other recipients to accept to - no one - other senders from relay - no one - name of the smarthost - strip local names from mails - yes - local users domain name - myserver - minimalize DNS requests - no - Also need to firgure out what directory to use for (maildir_home) - Setup smarthost password - some email addresses - courier imap does not need any setup!? Thats all :) Recent about squirrelmail, apache2 and fetchmail. I lookup the http://www.courier-mta.org/install.html - I have seen it but it was quite terrify - work for days and continouse maintenance. Hi. First: I never used the fax module, so I have no clue if this might be what you want. On Thursday 28 February 2008, tovis wrote: I have been start struggling on courier documentation and realized that is it a large and complex mail server package, with a lots of configuration issues and possibilities. Try google to find a more simple setup howto - I do not find any for my situation. May be courier is not good for me? I don't really have much experience with other MTAs, but most parts of the default configuration can be used as-is. Just because many things are possible, this does not mean that you need or want them. The default config will do just fine for many people. Especially if you don't use incoming SMTP (and so don't have to worry about IDENT lookups, blacklist configuration, greylisting or thinks like that). Have a look at http://www.courier-mta.org/install.html. More than half of the chapters are marked OPTIONAL and that is meant like that. :) The sections about configure/make/install (Everything from Preparing for installation up to Post-installation checks) should be obsolete if you have packages from your distro. Can you specify which part of the installation docs is complex if you leave out things you don't need? regards, Bernd -- Only one book has been printed in more copies than The Bible... ...the IKEA catalogue - Song Facts of Life by Lazyboy - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Hi. On Thursday 28 February 2008, tovis wrote: Setup exim4 as a smarthost using mta on Debian called as zero setup. There is small shell/perl questionary ned to answer about ten questions. Well, 10 Things to configure is not zero, isn't it? Maybe the Debian developers did a good job to write a script and set up your answers as config file options. They've chosen exim4 to write this for. Technically, I think the work should be kind of equal to do this setup with exim4 or with courier. If you relay on debian's script, okay, courier is out beacuse they've not written this script for courier. I lookup the http://www.courier-mta.org/install.html - I have seen it but it was quite terrify - work for days and continouse maintenance. Setting up a courier smarthost like you did it with exim took me about an hour or so (made a stupid mistake, that costs time) a few weeks ago. If you, as a beginner, have to read the docs twice, let it be 5 hours of work. But it's not work for days. Contionus maintainance (say: security upgrades) should be the basic work for all applications if you run anything connected to the internet. If you don't want that, you'd better leave it. regards, Bernd -- In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different. - Larry McVoy signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Right. The answer for me, it is good for me but of course not some much obviouse to setup then exim4 on Debian. I should do some jb, but the result would be apropriate :) About the maintenance I do not mean only updates/upgrades - Debian do it very well, mostly automatic security updates are does. I mean about blacklists, filters and other stuff top be safe - that no one will use my small server as a spam spreading/colleting box. Thanx Bernd I hove my next questions will so quckly answered as this :) Hi. On Thursday 28 February 2008, tovis wrote: Setup exim4 as a smarthost using mta on Debian called as zero setup. There is small shell/perl questionary ned to answer about ten questions. Well, 10 Things to configure is not zero, isn't it? Maybe the Debian developers did a good job to write a script and set up your answers as config file options. They've chosen exim4 to write this for. Technically, I think the work should be kind of equal to do this setup with exim4 or with courier. If you relay on debian's script, okay, courier is out beacuse they've not written this script for courier. I lookup the http://www.courier-mta.org/install.html - I have seen it but it was quite terrify - work for days and continouse maintenance. Setting up a courier smarthost like you did it with exim took me about an hour or so (made a stupid mistake, that costs time) a few weeks ago. If you, as a beginner, have to read the docs twice, let it be 5 hours of work. But it's not work for days. Contionus maintainance (say: security upgrades) should be the basic work for all applications if you run anything connected to the internet. If you don't want that, you'd better leave it. regards, Bernd -- In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different. - Larry McVoy - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: FAM and Gamin problems
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Chuck Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # * IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=0 IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=1 You could try IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=0 ... jerry -- Girl with crimson nails - Jesus 'round her neck -U2 - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]
Hi. On Thursday 28 February 2008, tovis wrote: I mean about blacklists, filters and other stuff top be safe - that no one will use my small server as a spam spreading/colleting box. If you don't open up SMTP to the outside world, you don't need any blacklist. Why do you compare a smarthost-style EXIM with a full-blown courier? Keep your config simple and you don't need to maintain anything you arn't using. But hey, it's up to you. Use it or not. I'm out of this. regards, Bernd -- Outside the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country. - Mayor Marion Barry, Washington, D.C. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: FAM and Gamin problems
Hi All, (Sorry if anybody gets this twice. I forget this membership was associated with an older email address so my first attempt was sent for moderation.) I have run a small courier implementation on a debian server for friends and family for the past few years. This uses local account Maildir delivery. Recently we have been experience performance problems and timeouts accessing the server from Thunderbird. After some googling I traced down FAM and the IDLE feature (which is confusing) as the likely culprit. I replaced FAM with Gamin. Performance improved immediately, however it is still not good and messages like this now show up constantly in syslog: Feb 27 07:36:09 ohana imapd-ssl: FAMMonitorDirectory(/home/chuck/Maildir/./new) failed: Broken pipe Feb 27 07:37:11 ohana imapd-ssl: FAMMonitorDirectory(/home/chuck/Maildir/./new) failed: Broken pipe Feb 27 07:37:23 ohana imapd-ssl: FAMMonitorDirectory(/home/chuck/Maildir/./.Open Source.axis2.axis-dev/new) failed: Broken pipe This is a debian Etch system running the debian Courier and Gamin packages. The Courier package is based on upstream version 0.53.5. I know these are not Sam's favorite packages, but unfortunately this is what we have on my favorite distribution. One possible issue is that my Maildir has many folders and is a bit large: ohana:/home/chuck/Maildir# du -hs 3.5G. ohana:/home/chuck/Maildir# du | wc -l 3341 Does anybody have any suggestions? Thanks a lot for any help! Chuck PS: here is my IDLE configuration: ohana:/etc/courier# grep IDLE imapd # IMAP_CAPABILITY="IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-SHA1 AUTH=CRAM-SHA256 IDLE" IMAP_CAPABILITY="IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE" IMAP_CAPABILITY_ORIG="IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-SHA1 AUTH=CRAM-SHA256 IDLE" ##NAME: IMAP_IDLE_TIMEOUT:0 # the server polls for changes to the folder, in IDLE mode (in seconds). IMAP_IDLE_TIMEOUT=60 ##NAME: IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE:0 # IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE to 1 enables enhanced IDLE mode, where multiple # IMPORTANT: IMAP_USELOCKS *MUST* also be set to 1, and IDLE must be included # * IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=0 IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=1 ohana:/etc/courier# -- Chuck Williams All Things Local Founder and CEO V: (808)889-6789 C: (808)854-9278 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: manawiz AIM: hawimanawiz Yahoo: jcwxx - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Zombie process in courier]
Enrique Verdes escribió: Gordon Messmer escribió: Enrique Verdes wrote: Chequing for other thins I found a Zombie process in the sistem. Here's the ps output. ¿Somebody has seen this? How can I avoid it? 0 200 2471 2468 25 0 11008 4384 - S? 0:00 /usr/bin/python /usr/lib/courier/etc/filters/active/pythonfilter 0 200 2472 2471 25 0 0 0 exit Z? 0:00 [courier-config] defunct It's a minor bug; I forgot to call wait() to clean it up. It won't cause any problems, and it's fixed in CVS. well, I patched config.py and after restarting pythonfilter get this. 0 200 21558 21443 21 0 0 0 exit Z? 0:00 [pythonfilter] defunct fixed... I had an error in the indentation :-( Thanks a lot, Gordon. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users -- */-- Enrique Verdes/** UyGroup*/ /Consulting Technology */_ www.uygroup.com.uy http://www.uygroup.com.uy_/*/ Av. Gral. Paz 1481 - CP 11400 Montevideo - Uruguay Phone/Fax: (+598-2) 600-6200 - ext. 223 */--/* AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: LA INFORMACIÓN CONTENIDA EN ESTE CORREO ELECTRÓNICO ES PRIVILEGIADA Y CONFIDENCIAL Y FUE ENVIADO PARA EL USO EXCLUSIVO DEL DESTINATARIO DESIGNADO EN EL MISMO. Si usted no es el destinatario, se prohibe estrictamente la reproducción, distribución, y cualquier otra forma de difusión o uso de esta comunicación. Si usted ha recibido este correo electrónico por error, por favor contéctese con nosotros inmediatamente al teléfono: (+598-2) 600-62-00 o por el correo electrónico: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] */--/* CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE DESIGNATED ABOVE. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction distribution, or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail by error please contact us immediately by telephone: (+598-2) 600-62-00 or by e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] */--/* / - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Zombie process in courier]
Enrique Verdes wrote: fixed... I had an error in the indentation :-( Thanks a lot, Gordon. No problem. Thanks for reporting the bug. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Zombie process in courier]
Gordon Messmer a écrit : Enrique Verdes wrote: fixed... I had an error in the indentation :-( Thanks a lot, Gordon. No problem. Thanks for reporting the bug. Hello, Where is the latest CVS version ? (As my box has been hacked, I will have to destroy and rebuild it There is no risk for now as I eliminated culprits and closed enough ports The n00b tried to use a file named nc.exe on a debian server... I think he has not created a lot of mess :-) ) - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]
Thank you for the help with this issue. Filtering is running smoothly. Attached is the Jérôme version of clamav.py, with the mail warning I added. Maybe can be of some use to somebody there. In case you have suggestions or improvements I'll be very thankfull if you let me know. Enrique. Gordon Messmer escribió: Enrique Verdes wrote: ---snip--- def mail(to='', who=''): sender='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' message = email.Message.Message() message[To] = to message[From]= sender message[Date]= email.Utils.formatdate(localtime=1) message[Subject] = 'Aviso de e-mail con virus' text=who + Le envio un mail que fue rechazado por el antivirus en el servidor I'd use string formatting instead of concatenation: text = You received a message from '%s', which contained a virus. % who message.set_payload(text) mailServer = smtplib.SMTP('localhost:25') mailServer.sendmail(sender, to, message.as_string()) mailServer.quit() def doFilter(bodyFile, controlFileList): # check for viruses try: pyclamd.init_unix_socket('/var/run/clamav/clamd.socket') avresult = pyclamd.contscan_file(bodyFile) except Exception, e: return 554 + str(e) if avresult == None: return '' if avresult.has_key(bodyFile): mail(courier.control.getRecipients(controlFileList), courier.control.getSender(controlFileList)) return 554 %s was detected. Abort! % avresult[bodyFile] Right there, you want: if avresult.has_key(bodyFile): sender = courier.control.getSender(controlFileList) for recipient in courier.control.getRecipients(controlFileList): mail(recipient, sender) return 554 %s was detected. Abort! % avresult[bodyFile] - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users -- */-- Enrique Verdes/** UyGroup*/ /Consulting Technology */_ www.uygroup.com.uy http://www.uygroup.com.uy_/*/ Av. Gral. Paz 1481 - CP 11400 Montevideo - Uruguay Phone/Fax: (+598-2) 600-6200 - ext. 223 */--/* AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: LA INFORMACIÓN CONTENIDA EN ESTE CORREO ELECTRÓNICO ES PRIVILEGIADA Y CONFIDENCIAL Y FUE ENVIADO PARA EL USO EXCLUSIVO DEL DESTINATARIO DESIGNADO EN EL MISMO. Si usted no es el destinatario, se prohibe estrictamente la reproducción, distribución, y cualquier otra forma de difusión o uso de esta comunicación. Si usted ha recibido este correo electrónico por error, por favor contéctese con nosotros inmediatamente al teléfono: (+598-2) 600-62-00 o por el correo electrónico: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] */--/* CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE DESIGNATED ABOVE. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction distribution, or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail by error please contact us immediately by telephone: (+598-2) 600-62-00 or by e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] */--/* / #!/usr/bin/python # clamav -- Courier filter which scans messages with ClamAV # Copyright (C) 2007 Jerome Blion [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Modifications made by Enrique Verdes [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. # # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the # GNU General Public License for more details. # # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA import sys import pyclamd import smtplib import courier.control import email.Message import email.Utils
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]
Jérôme Blion escribió: Jérôme Blion a écrit : Jérôme Blion a écrit : Courier and clamd are working as root... I meant daemon... lool I wrote too quickly... Definitely... I have to sleep... clamd is started as root and courier as daemon... :) With clamd running as root everything is going fine. But, my boss asked me he wanted that, when a virus infected mail were rejected, the intended recipient get a warning about it. So, being my first time doing python programming, began looking on variuos web sites and crafted this solution using smtp and email.Message modules. ---snip--- def mail(to='', who=''): sender='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' message = email.Message.Message() message[To] = to message[From]= sender message[Date]= email.Utils.formatdate(localtime=1) message[Subject] = 'Aviso de e-mail con virus' text=who + Le envio un mail que fue rechazado por el antivirus en el servidor message.set_payload(text) mailServer = smtplib.SMTP('localhost:25') mailServer.sendmail(sender, to, message.as_string()) mailServer.quit() def doFilter(bodyFile, controlFileList): # check for viruses try: pyclamd.init_unix_socket('/var/run/clamav/clamd.socket') avresult = pyclamd.contscan_file(bodyFile) except Exception, e: return 554 + str(e) if avresult == None: return '' if avresult.has_key(bodyFile): mail(courier.control.getRecipients(controlFileList), courier.control.getSender(controlFileList)) return 554 %s was detected. Abort! % avresult[bodyFile] ---snip--- but I'm getting this in the log files: Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: Raw stat: (33200, 3594100L, 2304L, 1, 200, 200, 2365L, 1181672562, 1181672562, 1181672562) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: Control file: /usr/lib/courier/var/tmp/118167/1181672561.3403.mail.uygroup.com.uy Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: Raw stat: (33200, 3594099L, 2304L, 1, 200, 200, 143L, 1181672561, 1181672561, 1181672561) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: Uncaught exception in clamav doFilter function: exceptions.AttributeError:'list' object has no attribute 'lstrip' Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/courier/etc/filters/active/pythonfilter, line 180, in processMessage Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: replyCode = i_filter[1](bodyFile, controlFileList) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pythonfilter/clamav.py, line 58, in doFilter Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: mail(courier.control.getRecipients(controlFileList), courier.control.getSender(controlFileList)) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pythonfilter/clamav.py, line 41, in mail Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: mailServer.sendmail(sender, to, message.as_string()) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/email/Message.py, line 129, in as_string Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/email/Generator.py, line 82, in flatten Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: self._write(msg) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/email/Generator.py, line 120, in _write Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: self._write_headers(msg) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/email/Generator.py, line 166, in _write_headers Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: header_name=h, continuation_ws='\t').encode() Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/email/Header.py, line 395, in encode Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: return self._encode_chunks(newchunks, maxlinelen) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/email/Header.py, line 355, in _encode_chunks Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: _max_append(chunks, s, maxlinelen, extra) Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/email/quopriMIME.py, line 79, in _max_append Jun 12 15:22:42 jupiter courierfilter: L.append(s.lstrip()) as far as I can tell, there's a problem with getSender, but I can't go further. If anybody has a clue or a better solution, I'll be very thankfull. Jerome Blion. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users --
[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]
Jérôme Blion escribió: Gordon Messmer a écrit : Enrique Verdes wrote: Gordon Messmer escribió: clamd probably doesn't have access to the mail spool unless you run it either as root, or as the same user that Courier uses. I encourage you to use the clamav.py filter from the distribution. It won't have that problem. clamav.py from the distribution uses pyclamav. In the page of pyclamav they encourage to use the new pyclamd. So it does. I'm not sure why... the scanfile() function isn't affected, and still works as it always has. Also, pyclamav uses clamav and libclamav 0.88 and I'm running clamav 0.90.3. You can rebuild pyclamav 0.4.0 with clamav 0.90.3. It works. No need... Jun 8 18:29:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pythonfilter/clamav.py, line 34, in doFilter Jun 8 18:29:42 jupiter courierfilter: if avresult[0]: It's not sufficient to just replace pyclamav with pyclamd. pyclamd.scan_file returns a different data type than pyclamav.scanfile does. You might check the list archives, someone else was recently using pyclamd. Here is the clamd.py I use on 2 servers... Thanks Jerome, I tried your file, only modifying the clamd socket location. That's what I get: Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Debugging filter invoked: Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: PID: 19788 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: CWD: /usr/lib/courier Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: EUID: 200 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: EGID: 200 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: UID: 200 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: GID: 200 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Additional groups: [200] Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Body: /usr/lib/courier/var/tmp/118157/D3594080 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Raw stat: (33200, 3594081L, 2304L, 1, 200, 200, 37602L, 1181572234, 1181572235, 1181572235) Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Control file: /usr/lib/courier/var/tmp/118157/1181572234.30864.mail.uygroup.com.uy Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Raw stat: (33200, 3594080L, 2304L, 1, 200, 200, 194L, 1181572234, 1181572234, 1181572234) Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Uncaught exception in clamav doFilter function: ScanError:lstat() failed. ERROR Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/courier/etc/filters/active/pythonfilter, line 180, in processMessage Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: replyCode = i_filter[1](bodyFile, controlFileList) Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pythonfilter/clamav.py, line 31, in doFilter Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: avresult = pyclamd.contscan_file(bodyFile) Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/pyclamd.py, line 328, in contscan_file Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: raise ScanError, virusname Which user is running your clamd daemon? HTH. Jerome Blion. #!/usr/bin/python # clamav -- Courier filter which scans messages with ClamAV # Copyright (C) 2007 Jerome Blion [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. # # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the # GNU General Public License for more details. # # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA import sys import pyclamd # Record in the system log that this filter was initialized. sys.stderr.write('Initialized the clamdfilter python filter\n') def doFilter(bodyFile, controlFileList): # check for viruses try: pyclamd.init_unix_socket('/tmp/clamd') avresult = pyclamd.contscan_file(bodyFile) except Exception, e: return 554 + str(e) if avresult == None: return '' if avresult.has_key(bodyFile): return 554 %s was detected. Abort! % avresult[bodyFile] if __name__ == '__main__': # we only work with 1 parameter if len(sys.argv) != 2: print Usage: clamd.py message_body_file sys.exit(0) print doFilter(sys.argv[1], ) - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]
Enrique Verdes a écrit : Jérôme Blion escribió: Gordon Messmer a écrit : Enrique Verdes wrote: Gordon Messmer escribió: clamd probably doesn't have access to the mail spool unless you run it either as root, or as the same user that Courier uses. I encourage you to use the clamav.py filter from the distribution. It won't have that problem. clamav.py from the distribution uses pyclamav. In the page of pyclamav they encourage to use the new pyclamd. So it does. I'm not sure why... the scanfile() function isn't affected, and still works as it always has. Also, pyclamav uses clamav and libclamav 0.88 and I'm running clamav 0.90.3. You can rebuild pyclamav 0.4.0 with clamav 0.90.3. It works. No need... Jun 8 18:29:42 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pythonfilter/clamav.py, line 34, in doFilter Jun 8 18:29:42 jupiter courierfilter: if avresult[0]: It's not sufficient to just replace pyclamav with pyclamd. pyclamd.scan_file returns a different data type than pyclamav.scanfile does. You might check the list archives, someone else was recently using pyclamd. Here is the clamd.py I use on 2 servers... Thanks Jerome, I tried your file, only modifying the clamd socket location. That's what I get: Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Debugging filter invoked: Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: PID: 19788 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: CWD: /usr/lib/courier Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: EUID: 200 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: EGID: 200 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: UID: 200 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: GID: 200 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Additional groups: [200] Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Body: /usr/lib/courier/var/tmp/118157/D3594080 Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Raw stat: (33200, 3594081L, 2304L, 1, 200, 200, 37602L, 1181572234, 1181572235, 1181572235) Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Control file: /usr/lib/courier/var/tmp/118157/1181572234.30864.mail.uygroup.com.uy Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Raw stat: (33200, 3594080L, 2304L, 1, 200, 200, 194L, 1181572234, 1181572234, 1181572234) Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: Uncaught exception in clamav doFilter function: ScanError:lstat() failed. ERROR Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/courier/etc/filters/active/pythonfilter, line 180, in processMessage Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: replyCode = i_filter[1](bodyFile, controlFileList) Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pythonfilter/clamav.py, line 31, in doFilter Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: avresult = pyclamd.contscan_file(bodyFile) Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: File /usr/lib/python2.4/pyclamd.py, line 328, in contscan_file Jun 11 11:30:35 jupiter courierfilter: raise ScanError, virusname Which user is running your clamd daemon? Courier and clamd are working as root... As the file is provided by pythonfilter to the clamd socket, I'm not sure that's the problem. What are the permissions on pythonfilter file? You can try to run clamd as root, but I don't think it will solve anything. BR. Jerome Blion. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]
Jérôme Blion a écrit : Courier and clamd are working as root... I meant daemon... lool I wrote too quickly... - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]
Jérôme Blion a écrit : Jérôme Blion a écrit : Courier and clamd are working as root... I meant daemon... lool I wrote too quickly... Definitely... I have to sleep... clamd is started as root and courier as daemon... :) Jerome Blion. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Building RPM on Centos]
Wayne Pascoe wrote: On Wed, April 18, 2007 12:12 pm, Jay Lee wrote: Did you try installing the redhat-rpm-config RPM yet? Sam (the main developer of Courier) has previously recommended that to a person having an identical issue on FC5 and it resolved the problem. Heh - I just tried that :) Not sure if my previous message made it to the list or not, but installing that has solved the problem. I have also submitted a patch to Sam that includes redhat-rpm-config as a dependency for the build. It'd be nice to see this in the FAQ, but don't think it can be made a standard BuildRequires item. It's not available for CentOS 5 x86, (and I assume RHEL 5 x86). I'm not sure under what situations it is available and required. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Building RPM on Centos]
Gordon Messmer wrote: Wayne Pascoe wrote: On Wed, April 18, 2007 12:12 pm, Jay Lee wrote: Did you try installing the redhat-rpm-config RPM yet? Sam (the main developer of Courier) has previously recommended that to a person having an identical issue on FC5 and it resolved the problem. Heh - I just tried that :) Not sure if my previous message made it to the list or not, but installing that has solved the problem. I have also submitted a patch to Sam that includes redhat-rpm-config as a dependency for the build. It'd be nice to see this in the FAQ, but don't think it can be made a standard BuildRequires item. It's not available for CentOS 5 x86, (and I assume RHEL 5 x86). I'm not sure under what situations it is available and required. Looks to me like CentOS, Fedora and RHEL all have redhat-rpm-config: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/6/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-6.noarch.rpm http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.0/os/i386/CentOS/redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-17.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-17.el5.src.rpm SUSE and Mandrake might not have it but I believe their deps are already broken anyways for the courier.spec anyway. I could be wrong though, I haven't used either of them in quite awhile. The package generally includes all files in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat which rpmbuild looks at for macros and rc files after looking for the files in /usr/lib/rpm. I believe the purpose is to allow distribution specific options to be passed to rpmbuild. rpmbuild will work fine if all the variables courier.spec uses are defined in the /usr/lib/rpm files but if they're not (as is the case in CentOS5) then the build will fail. Jay - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Building RPM on Centos]
Jay Lee wrote: Gordon Messmer wrote: It'd be nice to see this in the FAQ, but don't think it can be made a standard BuildRequires item. It's not available for CentOS 5 x86, (and I assume RHEL 5 x86). I'm not sure under what situations it is available and required. Looks to me like CentOS, Fedora and RHEL all have redhat-rpm-config: Thanks, Jay. I was looking at this way too early. I thought I did a yum search, and I hadn't. I've really got to quit computing in the morning. :( The package generally includes all files in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat which rpmbuild looks at for macros and rc files after looking for the files in /usr/lib/rpm. I believe the purpose is to allow distribution specific options to be passed to rpmbuild. rpmbuild will work fine if all the variables courier.spec uses are defined in the /usr/lib/rpm files but if they're not (as is the case in CentOS5) then the build will fail. I'm using CentOS 5, and my builds went fine. I think the problem is that /usr/lib/rpm/ia32e-linux/macros wasn't present on Wayne's system, and rpm reported that was the file it was using. I just downloaded rpm x86_64 from CentOS, and looked at the package contents. I can see that /usr/lib/rpm/x86_64-linux/macros is included, but rpm is looking for /usr/lib/rpm/ia32e-linux/macros. This should be reported to Red Hat as a bug in rpm. That file needs to be put in a directory which reflects the arch name that rpm is going to use to locate it later. Duh. Installing redhat-rpm-config fixes things in a roundabout way, but shouldn't be necessary. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: [DYNDNS #353270] your spf entry for your mailserver is brocken
Hi! Can someone help me with this spf problem. I've activated the spf stuff in courier with all settings to default. Do I've something wrong? -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [DYNDNS #353270] your spf entry for your mailserver is brocken Date: Wednesday 03 January 2007 03:52 From: Jason Hutchins via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert, thank you for contacting our customer support team. I just tried to create an account with you but I never get the mail from you as our mailserver finds a problem with your spf entry. here our mail server log Jan 2 18:09:10 mail courieresmtpd: error,relay=:::204.13.248.101,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 417 SPF error [EMAIL PROTECTED]: DNS MX lookup failed.? I looked further by doing a dig txt dyndns.com dyndns.com. 65600 IN TXT v=spf1 mx/24 ptr ip4:63.208.196.0/24 ip4:204.13.248.0/22 a:lists.dyndns.com ptr:opensrs.net include:outbound.mailhop.org ~all and than I did a dig mx outbound.mailhop.org and got nothing back, our mail server is correct. the include domain is missing the mx entry. There is nothing wrong with our SPF record for 'dyndns.com'. 'outbound.mailhop.org' has no MX records because the mailserver at this location should not receive email (no mailboxes for '@dyndns.com' or '@outbound.mailhop.org' addresses). You will need to change the mailserver's behavior, and/or simply use another address to receive the account confirmation emails. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Regards, Jason -- Jason Hutchins Customer Service Technician Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.com/ --- -- Regards, Robert Robert Penz robert AT penz DOT name Robert, thank you for contacting our customer support team. I just tried to create an account with you but I never get the mail from you as our mailserver finds a problem with your spf entry. here our mail server log Jan 2 18:09:10 mail courieresmtpd: error,relay=:::204.13.248.101,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 417 SPF error [EMAIL PROTECTED]: DNS MX lookup failed.? I looked further by doing a dig txt dyndns.com dyndns.com. 65600 IN TXT v=spf1 mx/24 ptr ip4:63.208.196.0/24 ip4:204.13.248.0/22 a:lists.dyndns.com ptr:opensrs.net include:outbound.mailhop.org ~all and than I did a dig mx outbound.mailhop.org and got nothing back, our mail server is correct. the include domain is missing the mx entry. There is nothing wrong with our SPF record for 'dyndns.com'. 'outbound.mailhop.org' has no MX records because the mailserver at this location should not receive email (no mailboxes for '@dyndns.com' or '@outbound.mailhop.org' addresses). You will need to change the mailserver's behavior, and/or simply use another address to receive the account confirmation emails. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Regards, Jason -- Jason Hutchins Customer Service Technician Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.com/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: getpw in authlib fails for courier-mta after recent update
-- Forwarded message --From: Marcus Ilgner [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Jul 5, 2006 11:17 AM Subject: Re: [courier-users] getpw in authlib fails for courier-mta after recent updateTo: Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]On 7/5/06, Marcus Ilgner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/5/06, Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marcus Ilgner wrote: On 7/5/06, *Stefan Hornburg* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marcus Ilgner wrote: Hello folks, after a recent update of courier-mta, the smtp daemon is unable to retrieve my users home directory using getpw. The authdaemon is set to use authpam and I can log in to imapd without problems: courierd: getpw(*username*) failed - returned by authlib. Using `getent passwd` on the command line, I am able to list all users together with their home directories. Debian package versions are iicourier-authdaemon0.58-3Courier authentication daemon iicourier-authlib 0.58-3Courier authentication library iicourier-base0.53.2-3Courier Mail Server - Base system iicourier-imap4.1.1-3 Courier Mail Server - IMAP server iicourier-imap-ssl 4.1.1-3 Courier Mail Server - IMAP over SSL iicourier-maildrop0.53.2-3 Courier Mail Server - Mail delivery agent iicourier-mta 0.53.2-3 Courier Mail Server - ESMTP daemon Which Debian distribution do you use ? Bye Racke It's Debian testing, since I need some packages not available in the stable branch :/. Additionally, I have added packages from secure-testing.debian.net http://secure-testing.debian.net to my apt sources.list. I just setup courier-mta on my new laptop with Debian testing and it works out of the box with PAM. Can you sent the log entries fromthe failed delivery ?ThanksRackeThis is the complete log output from syslog: Jul 5 11:02:36 anubis authdaemond: stopping authdaemond children Jul 5 11:02:36 anubis authdaemond: modules=authpam authldap, daemons=5Jul 5 11:02:36 anubis authdaemond: Installing libauthpamJul 5 11:02:36 anubis authdaemond: Installation complete: authpam Jul 5 11:02:36 anubis authdaemond: Installing libauthldapJul 5 11:02:36 anubis authdaemond: Installation complete: authldapJul 5 11:03:07 anubis courieresmtpd: started,ip=[::: 192.168.115.100]Jul 5 11:03:07 anubis submit: getpw( *username of destination user* ) failed - returned by authlib.Jul 5 11:03:07 anubis courieresmtpd: error,relay=::: 192.168.115.100 ,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],to=* [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 450 Service temporarily unavailable.Jul 5 11:03:07 anubis courieresmtpd: error,relay=::: 192.168.115.100,msg=502 ESMTP command error,cmd: DATASomehow, getpw() fails while other applications are able to look up the homedir of a given user. All user data is stored in LDAP. But since PAM is used, I guess this should not matter. Still, Imapd is working fine. Just wanted to add this comment to the 'LDAP' bit:a search using `ldapsearch -x -h localhost homeDirectory` successfully returns all home directories using anonymous bind, so I'm pretty sure that LDAP can be ruled out as the source for this problem. Greetings MarcusP.S.: I have switched to authldap for the moment but it gives me some headache, too, since it makes the server output a 456 Address temporarily unavailable every now and then. So I'd really like to get authpam back... :P Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: Maildrop
Hi, i need help with ldap + postfix + maildrop + courier. mi log is: Sep 13 13:11:16 mail2.ppp.es postfix/qmgr[7629]: [ID 197553 mail.info] D69E630878: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=780, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 13 13:11:17 mail2.ppp.es postfix/lmtp[7667]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 928E63087B: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=6, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=06828-09, from MTA: 250 Ok: queued as D69E630878) Sep 13 13:11:17 mail2.ppp.es postfix/qmgr[7629]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 928E63087B: removed Sep 13 13:11:17 mail2.ppp.es postfix/pipe[7671]: [ID 197553 mail.info] D69E630878: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=maildrop, delay=1, status=boun ced (user unknown. Command output: Invalid user specified. ) maildrop -V9 -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] is OK main.cf mailbox_command = /usr/bin/maildrop -d $USER maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1 virtual_transport = maildrop ... local_transport = virtual local_recipient_maps = $alias_maps $virtual_mailbox_maps alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_database = $alias_maps virtual_mailbox_domains = $virtual_mailbox_maps /etc/postfix/vdomains virtual_uid_maps = static:1001 virtual_gid_maps = static:1001 virtual_recipient_maps = ldap:recipientes virtual_minimum_uid=500 virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail virtual_mailbox_maps = virtual_mailbox_limit = 0 virtual_maildir_limit_message=El usuario... virtual_overquota_bounce = yes virtual_limit_override = yes virtual_maildir_extended = yes virtual_create_maildirsize = yes virtual_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual ldap:alias ... master.cf maildrop unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail argv=/usr/bin/maildrop -d ${recipient} maildropldap.conf: hostname localhost basedn dc=uuu,dc=es filter (objectclass=cuentaCorreo) binddn cn=admin,dc=ppp,dc=es bindpw ** timeout 5 search_method mail default_uidnumber 108 default_gidnumber 108 mailroot /var/mail mail_attr mail uid_attr uid uidnumber_attr correoUidNumber gidnumber_attr correoGidNumber maildir_attr mailbox homedirectory_attr correoDirectorio quota_attr correoQuota Thanks -- Manuel Rodríguez SalgadoEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[courier-users] [Fwd: Using LDAP quota for non-virtual users]
Hi all, Someone has some idea about??? I really want to use Courier, but without this function is impracticable... Regards, Fabiano Felix ---BeginMessage--- Hi All, I'm setting up a Postfix+Courier-Imap+Maildrop environment, which uses a pre-existent LDAP base (with Unix and Samba objects), with non-virtual users. Adding the courier.schema objects, I configure the system to send/receive messages without any problem, except that I can't have success using quota manager. I tested it using both courier and maildrop (maildrop is the postfix default delivery agent). I use the same apps configuration on an Postfix+Courier+Maildrop+MySQL +Virtual+Users setup, and quota works fine... someone using these apps with non-virtual users??? I tested many configurations, but I didn't obtain success... Any help will be apreciated... With best regards, Fabiano Felix ---End Message---
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Using LDAP quota for non-virtual users]
Fabiano Felix wrote: Someone has some idea about??? I really want to use Courier, but without this function is impracticable... I'm setting up a Postfix+Courier-Imap+Maildrop environment, which uses a pre-existent LDAP base (with Unix and Samba objects), with non-virtual users. Adding the courier.schema objects, I configure the system to send/receive messages without any problem, except that I can't have success using quota manager. I tested it using both courier and maildrop (maildrop is the postfix default delivery agent). I use the same apps configuration on an Postfix+Courier+Maildrop+MySQL +Virtual+Users setup, and quota works fine... someone using these apps with non-virtual users??? I tested many configurations, but I didn't obtain success... I'm not sure if it's possible for authpam to pull the information or not but another possibility would be to create a simple script that connects to LDAP, retrieves the quota for each user and updates their $HOME/Maildir/maildirsize file if the LDAP quota setting has changed. It shouldn't require to many resources to run the script hourly so that changes would show up within the hour. Jay -- Jay Lee Network / Systems Administrator Information Technology Dept. Philadelphia Biblical University -- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix ___ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: authmysql - failed to connect to mysqlserver (server=localhost, user=vexim)]
Pascal Speck wrote: I have a big Problem with configuring my authmysql-system. When I try to get my mail via POP3 or IMAP, an error occours in the authmysql-system: failed to connect to mysqlserver (server=localhost, user=vexim) when I try to connect via mysql vexim -u vexim -p, there is no error connecting. MYSQL_SERVERlocalhost MYSQL_USERNAME vexim MYSQL_PASSWORD mypasswd MYSQL_SOCKET/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock MYSQL_PORT 3306 Your config file specifies several items that may be different than the defaults that are used when you use the command line mysql tool. Log in as the daemon user (if that's what courier is running as): su - daemon -s /bin/bash Then try to connect to the socket and the TCP port. See if one of them doesn't work: mysql vexim -S /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock -u vexim -p mysql vexim -h localhost -P 3306 -u vexim -p --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: authmysql - failed to connect to mysqlserver (server=localhost, user=vexim)]
---BeginMessage--- Hello, I have a big Problem with configuring my authmysql-system. When I try to get my mail via POP3 or IMAP, an error occours in the authmysql-system: failed to connect to mysqlserver (server=localhost, user=vexim) when I try to connect via mysql vexim -u vexim -p, there is no error connecting. I hope someone can help me! Pascal Speck Here my authmysqlrc: ##NAME: LOCATION:0 # # The server name, userid, and password used to log in. MYSQL_SERVERlocalhost MYSQL_USERNAME vexim MYSQL_PASSWORD mypasswd ##NAME: MYSQL_SOCKET:0 # # MYSQL_SOCKET can be used with MySQL version 3.22 or later, it specifies the # filesystem pipe used for the connection # MYSQL_SOCKET/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock ##NAME: MYSQL_PORT:0 # # MYSQL_PORT can be used with MySQL version 3.22 or later to specify a port to # connect to. MYSQL_PORT 3306 ##NAME: MYSQL_OPT:0 # # Leave MYSQL_OPT as 0, unless you know what you're doing. MYSQL_OPT 0 ##NAME: MYSQL_DATABASE:0 # # The name of the MySQL database we will open: MYSQL_DATABASE vexim ##NAME: MYSQL_USER_TABLE:0 # # The name of the table containing your user data. See README.authmysqlrc # for the required fields in this table. MYSQL_USER_TABLEusers ##NAME: MYSQL_CRYPT_PWFIELD:0 # # Either MYSQL_CRYPT_PWFIELD or MYSQL_CLEAR_PWFIELD must be defined. Both # are OK too. crypted passwords go into MYSQL_CRYPT_PWFIELD, cleartext # passwords go into MYSQL_CLEAR_PWFIELD. Cleartext passwords allow # CRAM-MD5 authentication to be implemented. MYSQL_CRYPT_PWFIELD crypt ##NAME: MYSQL_CLEAR_PWFIELD:0 # # MYSQL_CLEAR_PWFIELD clear ##NAME: MYSQL_DEFAULT_DOMAIN:0 # # If DEFAULT_DOMAIN is defined, and someone tries to log in as 'user', # we will look up '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' instead. # # DEFAULT_DOMAIN defaultdomain ##NAME: MYSQL_UID_FIELD:0 # # Other fields in the mysql table: # # MYSQL_UID_FIELD - contains the numerical userid of the account # MYSQL_UID_FIELD uid ##NAME: MYSQL_GID_FIELD:0 # # Numerical groupid of the account MYSQL_GID_FIELD gid ##NAME: MYSQL_LOGIN_FIELD:0 # # The login id, default is id. Basically the query is: # # SELECT MYSQL_UID_FIELD, MYSQL_GID_FIELD, ... WHERE id='loginid' # MYSQL_LOGIN_FIELD username #NAME: MYSQL_HOME_FIELD:0 # MYSQL_HOME_FIELDpop ##NAME: MYSQL_NAME_FIELD:0 # # The user's name (optional) MYSQL_NAME_FIELDrealname ---End Message---
[courier-users] Fwd: Having problem compiling the code
Does anyone know if my problem is related to having a version of the compiler and libaries that is too new for the latest version of Courier IMAP? I just came across an article related to another piece of software that suggested the software be compiled with a version not greater than N. I'm wondering if I'm having a similar problem with my compile.Kenneth Ramirez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 07:26:33 -0700 (PDT)From: Kenneth Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Having problem compiling the codeTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just wondering if anyone could come up with any suggestions tothe problem that I'm still having? This morning, I ran "gmake clean", followed by gmake, and I'm still getting the error as described below: After configure, I ran the "gnu make" and it produced a compilation error. The following is the final lines from the compile output: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -c -o maildirsearchC.o maildirsearchC.cppIn file included from maildirsearchC.cpp:7:maildirsearch.h:97: syntax error before `;' tokenmake[2]: *** [maildirsearchC.o] Error 1make[2]: Leaving directory `/downloads/imap/courier-imap-3.0.7/maildir'make[1]: *** [all] Error 2make[1]: Leaving directory `/downloads/imap/courier-imap-3.0.7/maildir'make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1I then opened up the maildirsearch.h file and learned that the line it's complaining about is the following line:std::vectorunsigned rbuf; I'm guessing the I'm missing something on my Linux box, but I can't figure out what it is. I've done multiple apt-cache searches and have installed (what I think is) all the apt-get pacakges I would need for gnu c++. Can you help? I just checked again, and just as I thought, both the libstdc++-devel and libstdc++-ssa-devel are up to date and I have the latest ones, but I still have the same problem. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks,Ken __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
[courier-users] [Fwd: New Contact Confirmation Request]
Is there any chance we can boot people off the list who do stuff like this? It is very annoying to have this message come back to me every time I post. Presumably I'll get yet another one of these as a result of this post, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be none the wiser because he'll never see it (I am not going to jump through these silly hoops just so this person can get the messages that he signed up to receive). BTW, for anyone else out there who might be thinking this is an appropriate method for blocking spam, please go wash your brain out with soap. Just imagine if all 1400 people on this list decided to do the same thing: A new user joins the list, posts once, and gets flooded with 1400 requests to follow all kinds of stupid little instructions before anyone will read what he wrote. Sheesh... Original Message Subject: New Contact Confirmation Request From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Carmack [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you do not wish to read this click REPLY then paste the following code into the subject: 3413e3e41faebbd2b319eb8333408a86 Your e-mail address was not found within my list of confirmed senders. By responding to this message, you will be added and never bothered again by this process. I apologize for the inconvenience, if you do not wish to reply to this message, then please just click the link below to add your address: http://speed.spamwall.net/sw/approve.php?auth=3413e3e41faebbd2b319eb8333408a86id=ODExMzo2NDUyNjA= Thank you! Derrick Woolworth P.S. For those of you who are used to being able to send to me via [EMAIL PROTECTED] - that address is now filtered and I'm not using a non-filtered address anymore - just too much spam. --- Your Message Details Sender: Michael Carmack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [courier-users] Spam filter recommendation --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: fetchitem() patch
Hi here is the problem which our developer discovered in imapd in last version of courier (courier-0.45.2 on FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p4) but sent it in wrong list ;-) This is a forwarded message From: Ondrej Jombik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 4:11:42 PM Subject: fetchitem() patch ===8==Original message text=== [ Please CC me in the answer as I'm not in the list ] We discovered several SIGSEGVs while running Courier IMAP daemon. Full backtrace concernin to this issue is in the attachement. I discovered, that problem is in this part of code in fetch.c: if (do_open *fp == NULL) { *fp=open_cached_fp(msgnum); if (!*fp) { *open_err=1; return rc; } } if (parsemime !*mimep) { *mimep=fetch_alloc_rfc2045(msgnum, *fp); } You can see, that if open_cached_fp() returns NULL, *open_err is properly set, however *fp (with value of NULL) is passed into fetch_alloc_rfc2045() where fseek(fp, 0L, SEEK_SET) is called causing immediate SIGSEGV (at least on FreeBSD operating system). Patch in the attachement tries to solve this. Any reply would be appreciated. Thanks, Nepto [ Please CC me in the answer as I'm not in the list ] -- _/| Ondrej Jombik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://nepto.sk - ICQ #122428216 _ \ Platon SDG - open source software development - http://platon.sk `\| Ako sa do hory vola, tak sa zhori traktor! (c) 1999 Rattkin/MFF '` ===8===End of original message text=== -- S pozdravom, Jan Stanik Jan Stanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nextra s.r.o.--- fetch.c.ori 2004-03-24 15:56:31.0 +0100 +++ fetch.c 2004-03-24 15:56:25.0 +0100 @@ -403,8 +403,10 @@ if (do_open *fp == NULL) { *fp=open_cached_fp(msgnum); - if (!*fp) + if (!*fp) { *open_err=1; + return rc; + } } if (parsemime !*mimep) (gdb) bt full #0 0x4811ef75 in fseeko () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 No symbol table info available. #1 0x4811ef27 in fseek () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 No symbol table info available. #2 0x804cb15 in fetch_alloc_rfc2045 (msgnum=4, fp=0x0) at fetch.c:1501 No locals. #3 0x804a451 in fetchitem (fp=0xbfbfb0e8, open_err=0xbfbfb0dc, fi=0x80af020, i=0x80ae7ec, msgnum=4, mimep=0xbfbfb0e4) at fetch.c:412 fetchfunc = (void (*)(struct __sFILE *, struct fetchinfo *, struct imapscaninfo *, long unsigned int, struct rfc2045 *)) 0x804a4f0 envelope parsemime = 1 rc = 0 do_open = 1 #4 0x8049f92 in do_fetch (n=5, byuid=0, p=0x80af020) at fetch.c:273 fi = (struct fetchinfo *) 0x80af020 fp = (struct __sFILE *) 0x0 rfc2045p = (struct rfc2045 *) 0x0 seen = 0 open_err = 1 #5 0x804f1b2 in do_msgset (msgset=0x80b0081 , msgfunc=0x8049e78 do_fetch, msgfunc_arg=0x80af020, isuid=0) at imapd.c:1001 i = 5 j = 5 rc = 134638200 last = 6 #6 0x80581e4 in do_imap_command (tag=0xbfbfb398 000e) at imapd.c:5407 fi = (struct fetchinfo *) 0x80af020 msgset = 0x80b0080 5 curtoken = (struct imaptoken *) 0x80adba0 uid = 0 #7 0x8065b62 in mainloop () at mainloop.c:93 rc = 0 tag = 000e, '\000' repeats 11876 times, Rb\nH\bC\013H\001\000\000\000\003, '\000' repeats 11 times, \200G\013HPâ¿¿\226g\nHÄ, '\000' repeats 11 times, \204g\nH\bC\013H, '\000' repeats 20 times, \214â¿¿\000\201\013H\bC\013H\003\000\000\000mg\nH\000\201\013H\000\000\000\000Ä\000\000\000Lg\nH\bC\013H\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000úÕ\nH\bC\013H\001\000\000\000¼â¿¿¯a\nHÄ\000\000\000,ó¿¿,ó¿¿\234a\nH\bC\013H\000 \001\000\003\000\000\000\022\020\000\000^?^?^?^?\000\000\000\000,ó¿¿ð_\nH`ã... curtoken = (struct imaptoken *) 0x80adba0 noerril = 0 #8 0x805a205 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbfbff48c) at imapd.c:6334 ip = 0xbfbffcc2 195.168.1.5 p = 0xbfbffe2a IMAP tag = 0xbfbffe3c oldumask = 49087
[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: courier-pop with maildir in /var/mail]
hi: (...) The function of /etc/courier/hosteddomains is very similar to the one of /etc/courier/locals. Both configuration files specify a list of domains that are considered to be local domains - domains whose mailboxes are stored locally. (...) check this url http://www.courier-mta.org/makehosteddomains.html bye On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 12:29, Craig Schneider wrote: Hi Guys Have configure exim to deliver mail to /var/mail/[EMAIL PROTECTED], now I need to tell courier-pop and courier-imap that the mail resides here. Any ideas ? Thanks Craig -- .. .:. Martin Arrieta .:. .:. Intersys Uruguay .''``. Debian .:. .:. 25 de Mayo 568: :' : GNU-linux .:. .:. Montevideo - Uruguay `. `'.:. .:. Tel/Fax: (5982) 915-4816* `- .:. .:. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .:. .:. Web: www.intersys.com.uy www.necrite.com .:. .:. ICQ#: 36181820 .:. .. --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
Yes... strange! :-( This happened yesterday, I tried multiple times to post a message (always from the same account and same server) and they would bounce. I've seen this happen in the past. I don't know if I have something misconfigured with my server, it happens very rarely, and then towards the end of the day the list will start accepting the post again. This is strange and annoying. :-( Is this a feature of courier, that it checks/verifies the sender address (which, btw, has always been a perfectly valid address) Wild... you're emailing this list with a rejection from the list saying you can't email it? Neat trick :-)Did you send these messages from different servers or different accounts? == Hello, Does anyone know why I'm getting the error below? This started happening all of a sudden. The sender address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is a valid address... Is this an error message generated by courier? If so, how can courier be configured to test/check sender addresses? Also, Please read below the original message I've been trying to post, but which is getting bounced. Thanks for your help. Ricardo - Message Forwarded on 12/08/03 09:19 pm - From: Courier mail server at americasnet.com @ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NOTICE: mail delivery status. Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:02:26 -0800 This is a delivery status notification from mail1.americasnet.com, running the Courier mail server, version 0.43.1. The original message was received on Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:02:24 -0800 from server2.americasnet.com (localhost [:::127.0.0.1]) --- UNDELIVERABLE MAIL Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mail.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.206]: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Sender verify failed --- If your message was also sent to additional recipients, their delivery status is not included in this report. You may or may not receive other delivery status notifications for additional recipients. The original message follows as a separate attachment. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 14:49, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: Is this a feature of courier, that it checks/verifies the sender address (which, btw, has always been a perfectly valid address) Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mail.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.206]: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Sender verify failed I think that the 550 is the response from mail.sourceforge.net. Your courier server tried to send your message and the server at the other end refused and returned 550 Sender verify failed. So courier sent the message back to you as undeliverable. Something happened at sourceforge's end that they didn't like your return address - but only certain times. DNS weirdness??? Jeff Jansen --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
--On Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2003 15:16 + Jeff Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 09 December 2003 14:49, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: Is this a feature of courier, that it checks/verifies the sender address (which, btw, has always been a perfectly valid address) Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mail.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.206]: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Sender verify failed I think that the 550 is the response from mail.sourceforge.net. Your courier server tried to send your message and the server at the other end refused and returned 550 Sender verify failed. So courier sent the message back to you as undeliverable. Something happened at sourceforge's end that they didn't like your return address - but only certain times. DNS weirdness??? Sourceforge introduced the 'callback' some moths ago. Check your logs (as you always should before posting...) and you may see a connect from there at the same time. If you dont see anyting it was probably because you server was unreachable like just now. mail1.americasnet.com has a delay of at least 30 seconds until the greeting appears and mail2.americasnet.com just sits there without any greeting at all for 2 minutes: # telnet 38.118.152.247 25 Trying 38.118.152.247... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out You are probably using defunct dnsbl or something alike. Additionally the identical priority of your mx prevents a fallback, one good configured mailserver is still better than two messed up boxes ;) Roland --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
Hello, Does anyone know why I'm getting the error below? This started happening all of a sudden. The sender address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is a valid address... Is this an error message generated by courier? If so, how can courier be configured to test/check sender addresses? Also, Please read below the original message I've been trying to post, but which is getting bounced. Thanks for your help. Ricardo - Message Forwarded on 12/08/03 09:19 pm - From: Courier mail server at americasnet.com @ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NOTICE: mail delivery status. Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:02:26 -0800 This is a delivery status notification from mail1.americasnet.com, running the Courier mail server, version 0.43.1. The original message was received on Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:02:24 -0800 from server2.americasnet.com (localhost [:::127.0.0.1]) --- UNDELIVERABLE MAIL Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mail.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.206]: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Sender verify failed --- If your message was also sent to additional recipients, their delivery status is not included in this report. You may or may not receive other delivery status notifications for additional recipients. The original message follows as a separate attachment. From: Ricardo Kleemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please help understanding mailq, I have messages that seem to be stuck Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:02:23 -0800 Hi, I'm having a hard time understanding why a message that is in the queue is still pending. I don't quite understand how the queue mechanism works, even after having read the queue.html document. So as an example, I have a message in the queue, where the maillog only shows a newmsg entry and does not have any followup information: Dec 8 10:04:41 server2 courierd: newmsg,id=0F00536A.3FD4BD38.52AE: dns; mysql (localhost [:::127.0.0.1]) The message originated on the localhost from mailman, a mailing list manager. There is no other mention of this message id in the maillog, and the message was queued up about 1 hour ago. Even more strange, maybe, is that I've issed the command courier flush 0F00536A.3FD4BD38.52AE at least once, but the message does not leave the queue, and maillog still makes no further references to the message. I can see the message via mailq, here is its entry: 5.1K 0F00536A.3FD4BD38.52AE Dec 08 10:04 daemon sender list recip list recip list recip list recip list recip list recip list recip list recip ... In this particular case, there were about 13 recipients for delivery, all of which happened to be of the same domain. When I look at the control file for this message, I don't see any useful information that would indicate to me why the message is still pending; it doesn't even seem, from looking at both the control file and the maillog, that delivery has even been attempted yet. Here's the contents of the control file, with addresses stripped out: ssender fdns; mysql (localhost [:::127.0.0.1]) e t M0F00536A.3FD4BD38.52AE rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N rlist recip R N E1071338680 p1070935480 W1070921080 A1070906681 Could maybe the problem be related to my queuelo and queuehi settings? I had set those to high values because my system has a large number of queued messages at all times, but maybe that is causing some problems... I have queuelo=5000 and queuehi=1 Following suggestions from previous posts in this list, the partition where var/msgq and var/msgs is, is mounted with noatime, to increase performance. I hope there's no adverse effect due to that. Anyway, I can't understand why there would be a newmsg entry in the log but then no other references to the message whatsoever, even after trying to flush it out. And the problem isn't with only this one message. The same post to the list generated a few outgoing messages from mailman, and there are 2 other related messages in the queue which are also stuck. Thanks for any help Ricardo [Attachment: unnamed_file] Reporting-MTA: dns; mail1.americasnet.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:02:24 -0800 Received-From-MTA: dns; server2.americasnet.com (localhost [:::127.0.0.1]) Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; mail.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.206] Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Sender verify failed --=_courier_0
[courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I've moved my mail server from one machin to an other - all seemed to work except that noone can subscribe to our mailling list. There all getting a Invalid confirmation. message. I tried it even by myself. I get the same error message. I don't know what I should do and didn't find anything in the history of this mailling list. ps: I resend this message with my subscribed mail address, so you don't need to abrove the first mail. sorry. - -- Regards, Robert - -- Robert Penz penz at informatik dot tu-muenchen dot de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/phUt8tTsQqJDUBMRAuhBAJ4wBIggexR+MT8fnOM90cBNSikR9ACfeRF5 wGv9A0GUK8ZwMgk5VlU5XmY= =u/lN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---BeginMessage--- This is a delivery status notification from outertech.com, running the Courier mail server, version 0.37.3. The original message was received on Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:35:04 +0100 from notebook.penz (L0437P01.dipool.highway.telekom.at [:::62.46.118.129]) --- UNDELIVERABLE MAIL Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Invalid confirmation. --- If your message was also sent to additional recipients, their delivery status is not included in this report. You may or may not receive other delivery status notifications for additional recipients. The original message follows as a separate attachment. Reporting-MTA: dns; outertech.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:35:04 +0100 Received-From-MTA: dns; notebook.penz (L0437P01.dipool.highway.telekom.at [:::62.46.118.129]) Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: unknown; Invalid confirmation. ---BeginMessage--- On Monday 03 November 2003 09:34, you wrote: == STOP! == You MUST read the following instructions in its entirety, before replying to this message! Hello, this is the Courier mailing list manager. I manage the announcement list mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I received the following subscription request. In order to make sure that this request really came from you, you must confirm your subscription request as follows. * Reply to this confirmation request. * Before sending the reply, go to the subject of your reply message and add the word yes to the beginning of the subject. You MUST add the word yes to the subject of your reply message in order for the confirmation request to go through. * DON'T REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you only hit the reply button it wont, as the reply-to is set to an other address. Copy of the original subscription request received: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 33) by outertech.com with local; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:34:38 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: subscribe request via web using ip 62.46.118.129 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: PHP/4.2.3 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:34:38 +0100 -- Regards, Robert -- Robert Penz penz at informatik dot tu-muenchen dot de ---End Message--- ---End Message---
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
--On Montag, 3. November 2003 09:43 +0100 Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I've moved my mail server from one machin to an other - all seemed to work except that noone can subscribe to our mailling list. There all getting a Invalid confirmation. message. I tried it even by myself. I get the same error message. I don't know what I should do and didn't find anything in the history of this mailling list. ps: I resend this message with my subscribed mail address, so you don't need to abrove the first mail. sorry. After digging out the actual bounce from nested attachments... This is a delivery status notification from outertech.com, running the Courier mail server, version 0.37.3. The original message was received on Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:35:04 +0100 from notebook.penz (L0437P01.dipool.highway.telekom.at [:::62.46.118.129]) --- UNDELIVERABLE MAIL Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Invalid confirmation. I am shure there are several references to this problem in the archive - back when courier 0.37 was used. But you better spend the time with the long overdue upgrade. Roland --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 03 November 2003 10:28, Roland wrote: I am shure there are several references to this problem in the I'm on this list now for 1,5 years and I did a full text search for Invalid confirmation and didn't get one single hit. I also entered: Invalid confirmation courier into google and got no hit. archive - back when courier 0.37 was used. But you better spend the time with the long overdue upgrade. thats not that easy .. 0.37 is still the version thats shipped with debian 3.0 (woody) and I like to stay with the debian packages anyway I moved from a woody to a woody .. so no change in the version of courier, on the first server it worked on the second not. - -- Regards, Robert - -- Robert Penz robert dot penz at outertech dot com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/pidW8tTsQqJDUBMRAvnqAJsHjJp9biyvgf+nutIOBucsr/j3sgCeKdWC /LU1MRDxPbNI/KU5UqVgudo= =YDFQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
--On Montag, 3. November 2003 11:00 +0100 Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm on this list now for 1,5 years and I did a full text search for Invalid confirmation and didn't get one single hit. I also entered: Invalid confirmation courier into google and got no hit. There where some posts, this note could refer to your problem: 2002-07-24 Mr. Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] * courier/cmlmbounce.C: Ignore case of bounce tokens. archive - back when courier 0.37 was used. But you better spend the time with the long overdue upgrade. thats not that easy .. 0.37 is still the version thats shipped with debian 3.0 (woody) and I like to stay with the debian packages Your choice, but apt easy allows to use unstable for individual packages, and Debian would be rather unusable if not ;) http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/courier-base.html anyway I moved from a woody to a woody .. so no change in the version of courier, on the first server it worked on the second not. Apt to 0.42.2, and this also fixes many bugs you dont want to know about. Roland --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: [Evolution] IMAP Problem - verbose debug]
Can someone who knows a lot more about IMAP than I do help me with this. I am trying get Evolution to work with one of my IMAP accounts, and I have been told that the server is not working correctly? However, I have used other mail clients with that server without any problem? Original Message Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP Problem - verbose debug From: Not Zed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, February 20, 2003 9:44 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, according to that, its sending the * CAPABLITY response on two lines - which is invalid. Not that that makes any sense ... unless its a custom courier imapd or something else is interfereing with the stream. At least, i'm pretty sure the code keeps reading the input until it reaches a \r\n, and not just each packet, might need to check that. On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 12:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [cdavis@localhost cdavis]$ CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 evolution-mail Evolution Mail ready and running. received: * OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2002 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYING for distribution information.sending : A0 CAPABILITY received: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 CHILDREN NAMESPACE received: THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT camel-imap-provider-WARNING **: Unexpected response from IMAP server: THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 09:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to connect to my IMAP server and get the following error: Unexpected response from IMAP server: THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT run CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 evolution-mail in a terminal, then run evolution you should get a print out of imap server traffic, attach it to a bug. I know the IMAP server works because I have used it with Outlook before and I am sending this mail through SquirrelMail using the IMAP server. No you're not. IMAP is only used to receive store mail, not send it. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] (fwd) Re: maildir in Gnus vs. clock corrections and PID recycling
Paul Jarc found a problem with the new/time.inode.hostname approach, he suggests tagging the inode, such as new/1234567890.i4321.hermes, read below. -- Matthias Andree ---BeginMessage--- Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that Postfix, Courier and Maildrop will settle on using the tmp/* file inode number for the unique part in new/, so these applications will rename from tmp/time.pid_count.hostname to new/time.inode.hostname. What I saw in the qmail archives was new/time.inode.pid.hostname. time.inode.hostname is extremely broken, and must not be used: there might be two delivery programs running at once. One might be an old one using pid and the other might be a new one using inode. If the old one's pid is the same as the new one's inode, you can get a collision. So it should be time.iinode.hostname instead, to ensure that it cannot be confused with the old format. Please pass this on to anyone who is planning to use time.inode.hostname. paul ---End Message---
[courier-users] Fwd: AUTH CRAM + PAM
Hi! Is there any way to use SMTP Auth CRAM-MD5 with authpam authentication module? Please CC me because I'm not (yet:) subscribed to the list... Thanks! --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: imap and ldap]
Does this affect my courier-imap lookup? if so, what should i do? if not, then could you please give me any suggestions? No, I asked the same question on the OpenLDAP list a few months back. Hi all, i am still having trouble connecting courier and ldap, and i think my problem is ldap related, because i have modified my ldif entry and my authldaprc file several times with no luck, please i need to know if im missing something here or if i should edit another file or what this is my curent ldap entry and authldaprc files: For the other questions, you need to show some logs. It is very difficulty to simply guess what is going wrong from your configuration files, although they help too. run a tail -f /var/log/syslog on your imap server run tail -f /var/log/syslog on your ldap server. Setup your /etc/ldap/slapd.conf file to allow verbose logging and restart slapd. I like #loglevel 4 You need to narrow the problem down. Use courierauthtest it will give you a better idea where things are failing. Theodore Knab - Washington College Chestertown, Maryland, USA [Unix] Systems Engineer x7419 --- Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd from bugtraq: SECURITY.NNOV: Courier CPU exhaustion + bonus on imap-uw
This was posted on BugTraq this afternoon, in case anybody hasn't seen it. -ScottG. From: 3APA3A [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SECURITY.NNOV: Courier CPU exhaustion + bonus on imap-uw To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: VULN-DEV [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 16:14:15 +0400 Reply-To: 3APA3A [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: http://www.security.nnov.ru Resent-From: 3APA3A [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original version http://www.security.nnov.ru/advisories/courier.asp Title: Courier CPU exhaustion Author: ZARAZA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: May, 31 2002 Affected: courier-0.38.1 Vendor: Double Precision, Inc. Risk: Low to average Remote: Yes Exploitable:Yes Vendor notified:May, 20 2002 Product URL:http://www.courier-mta.org SECURITY.NNOV URL: http://www.security.nnov.ru Advanced info: http://www.security.nnov.ru/search/news.asp?binid=2055 Introduction: Courier is widely used suite of e-mail services written with security in mind. Problem: A loop with unchecked iteration counter controlled by user input may cause courier to freeze for over the minute with 100% CPU usage on single command or message. Details: rfc822_parsedt.c: unsigned day=0, mon=0, year; ... unsigned y; ... if (year 1970)return (0); ... for (y=1970; yyear; y++) ... year may be any unsigned integer. Vendor: Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] was contacted on May, 20. Problem was patched in CVS version on the same day. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Bonus on imap-uw: Imap-uw allows user to access any file he could access locally. It's not a bug it's insecurity by design (it was not created with security in mind ;-). According FAQ from vendor's web site (it's not mentioned in a FAQ inside program distribution): -=-=-=-=-=-=- 5.1 I see that the IMAP server allows access to arbitary files on the system, including /etc/passwd! How do I disable this? You should not worry about this if your IMAP users are allowed shell access. The IMAP server does not permit any access that the user can not have via the shell. If, and only if, you deny your IMAP users shell access, you may want to consider one of three choices. Note that these choices reduce IMAP functionality, and may have undesirable side effects. Each of these choices involves an edit to file src/osdep/unix/env_unix.c The first (and recommended) choice is to set restrictBox as described in file CONFIG. This will disable access to the filesystem root, to other users' home directory, and to superior directory. The second (and strongly NOT recommended) choice is to set closedBox as described in file CONFIG. This puts each IMAP session into a so-called chroot jail, and thus setting this option is extremely dangerous; it can make your system much less secure and open to root compromise attacks. So do not use this option unless you are absolutely certain that you understand all the issues of a chroot jail. The third choice is to rewrite routine mailboxfile() to implement whatever mapping from mailbox name to filesystem name (and restrictions) that you wish. This is the most general choice. As a guide, you can see at the start of routine mailboxfile() what the restrictBox choice does. -=-=-=-=-=- It should be noted that restrictBox/closedBox is not described in neither CONFIG nor any other document from program distribution at all (as for imap-2001a)... And even if you smart enough to check the FAQ on the web site after you red the FAQ in source distribution restrictBox can be bypassed in case of any Windows builds (for example http://sourceforge.net/projects/uw-imap-cygwin/) because '\\' symbol is never checked. Hope nobody uses UW under NT or a version from OS ports distribution in production environment because as far as I can see port maintainers do not change the value of closedBox :). I'm not sure if there are utilities to access file system via imap-uw, a created a small set of tools you can download imaptools.tgz from http://www.security.nnov.ru/search/news.asp?binid=2063 it includes: imapget.c - to retrieve file via imap-uw, usage example: imapget imap.host.name /etc/passwd passwd it should work for both text and binary files. imapls.c - to get a file listing, usage example: imapls imaphostname /tmp/\* ls-tmp imaprm.c, imapmkdir.c - hope you catch the idea. it's also possible to create file with any name in mailbox format. -- http://www.security.nnov.ru /\_/\ { , . } |\ +--oQQo-{ ^ }-+ \ | ZARAZA U 3APA3A } +-o66o--+ / |/ You know my name - look up my number (The
[courier-users] Fwd: courier-pop3d AUTHFAILURE
i figured out that when i am starting /usr/lib/courier-imap/pop3d.rc start it works and pop3d daemon is launched without errors, ... so why does courier-pop3d produce this error and pop3d.rc doesnt? strange... stefan. Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 11:48:42 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: stefan radulian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: courier-pop3d AUTHFAILURE hi again, after finally having configured courier-imap to work with mysql i now need to get pop3 to work... but when i am starting /usr/sbin/courier-pop3d i only get AUTHFAILURE my /etc/courier-imap/pop3d looks like this: symbion courier-imap # egrep ^[^#] pop3d prefix=/usr exec_prefix=/usr sbindir=/usr/sbin PIDFILE=/var/run/pop3d.pid MAXDAEMONS=40 MAXPERIP=4 AUTHMODULES=authdaemon AUTHMODULES_ORIG=authdaemon POP3AUTH= POP3AUTH_ORIG=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 CRAM-SHA1 POP3AUTH_TLS= POP3AUTH_TLS_ORIG=LOGIN PLAIN PORT=110 ADDRESS=0 TCPDOPTS=-nodnslookup -noidentlookup POP3DSTART=NO MAILDIR=.maildir and here is my pop3d.cnf: symbion courier-imap # cat pop3d.cnf RANDFILE = /usr/share/pop3d.rand [ req ] default_bits = 1024 encrypt_key = yes distinguished_name = req_dn x509_extensions = cert_type prompt = no [ req_dn ] C=US ST=NY L=New York O=Courier Mail Server OU=Automatically-generated POP3 SSL key CN=localhost [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ cert_type ] nsCertType = server is there a way to check POP3 connections against the MySQL database i set up for IMAP (and that is actually working fine with IMAP). i guess POP3AUTH= must be set to something like mysql or so... but i have no idea. i couldnt really get any reasonable information on the web,... can anyone help? stefan. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.
Hi! what does tell me that error message? and what do need it to change in order that it works? -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: NOTICE: mail delivery status. Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 18:20:40 -0500 From: Courier mail server at outertech.com To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a delivery status notification from outertech.com, running the Courier mail server, version 0.37.2.20020131. The original message was received on Fri, 08 Feb 2002 18:20:38 -0500 from notebook (80-100.F.dial.o-tel-o.net [:::212.144.80.100]) --- UNDELIVERABLE MAIL Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: smtp.ceplus.de [217.194.64.100]: STARTTLS 500 starttls: accept: error::lib(0):func(0):reason(0) --- If your message was also sent to additional recipients, their delivery status is not included in this report. You may or may not receive other delivery status notifications for additional recipients. The original message follows as a separate attachment. --- -- Regards, Robert Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re:[courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these?
sysop == sysop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Use rbl from relays.osirusoft.com. sysop Attached is a txt file with headers from a few messages sysop getting sent to one of my users what would you guys put sysop in your bofh file? Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sysop Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sysop iunc.net (echo.iunc.net [:::202.56.152.163]) by anakin sysop with esmtp; Tue, 08 Jan 2002 07:38:19 -0800 Received: sysop (qmail 17950 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2002 15:33:00 - sysop Received: from gate-kts.paritet.kts.ru (HELO ME) sysop (212.41.1.193) by watch.disney-channel.with.33inch.tv with sysop SMTP; 8 Jan 2002 15:33:00 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sysop Subject:Are we doing anything tonight? :) X-Priority: 1 sysop (Highest) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: sysop Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Mime-Version: 1.0 sysop Content-Type: multipart/mixed; sysop boundary==_anakin-28788-1010504301-0001-2 Message-ID: sysop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 sysop Jan 2002 07:38:19 -0800 To: undisclosed-recipients: ; sysop Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: sysop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sysop domaincontrol_2.double-precision.com sysop (dsl254-060-052.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net sysop [:::216.254.60.52]) by anakin with esmtp; Mon, 07 Jan sysop 2002 17:59:35 -0800 Received: from ME - 216.219.23.221 by sysop domaincontrol_2.double-precision.com with Microsoft sysop SMTPSVC(5.5.1775.675.6); Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:41:53 -0600 sysop From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:So whats up for tonight? sysop :) X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sysop X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 sysop Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; sysop boundary==_anakin-24340-1010455176-0001-2 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sysop Message-ID: sysop [EMAIL PROTECTED] sysop Date: 7 Jan 2002 19:42:55 -0600 To: undisclosed-recipients: sysop ; sysop Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: sysop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from qpi.qpitools.com sysop (dsl254-065-109.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net sysop [:::216.254.65.109]) by anakin with esmtp; Mon, 07 Jan sysop 2002 12:12:15 -0800 Received: from ME (216.219.23.221 sysop [216.219.23.221]) by qpi.qpitools.com with SMTP (Microsoft sysop Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id sysop CJ9KKVK0; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:02:53 -0500 From: sysop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:So whats up for tonight? :) sysop X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: sysop Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Mime-Version: 1.0 sysop Content-Type: multipart/mixed; sysop boundary==_anakin-20642-1010434338-0001-2 Message-ID: sysop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 sysop Jan 2002 12:12:15 -0800 To: undisclosed-recipients: ; ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re:[courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you blockthese?
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote: relays.osirusoft.com is not to be trusted. Joe Jared, who runs it, is going down the same road as Alan Brown, entering spite listing into the zone that do not belong there. This is why I pulled preconfigured settings for relays.osirusoft.com out of webadmin. Bugger. So, OT as this is, is there any reliable/reputable RBL? -- Juha Take off every sig! ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these?
Sam Varshavchik wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Sysop wrote: Attached is a txt file with headers from a few messages getting sent to one of my users what would you guys put in your bofh file? Nothing. I would block the actual source of the spew, via smtpaccess. Hrmm, this is what I'm after. I can't tell what the actual source is... ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
RE: [courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these?
Ordb.org runs a good one, it only lists open relays, not input or output-only relays, just true open relays. -Original Message- From: Juha Saarinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:51 PM To: Sam Varshavchik Cc: Courier Subject: Re:[courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these? On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote: relays.osirusoft.com is not to be trusted. Joe Jared, who runs it, is going down the same road as Alan Brown, entering spite listing into the zone that do not belong there. This is why I pulled preconfigured settings for relays.osirusoft.com out of webadmin. Bugger. So, OT as this is, is there any reliable/reputable RBL? -- Juha Take off every sig! ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/c ourier-users ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
RE: [courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these?
input/output relays are every bit as much a problem as single host open relays. The only real difference is the number of hosts involved. On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Hubbard, David wrote: Ordb.org runs a good one, it only lists open relays, not input or output-only relays, just true open relays. -Original Message- From: Juha Saarinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:51 PM To: Sam Varshavchik Cc: Courier Subject: Re:[courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these? On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote: relays.osirusoft.com is not to be trusted. Joe Jared, who runs it, is going down the same road as Alan Brown, entering spite listing into the zone that do not belong there. This is why I pulled preconfigured settings for relays.osirusoft.com out of webadmin. Bugger. So, OT as this is, is there any reliable/reputable RBL? -- Juha Take off every sig! ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/c ourier-users ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users -- If I had a dollar for every brain that you don't have, I'd have one dollar. - Squidward to SpongeBob ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] [Fwd: stupid mail servers, broken STARTTLS fallback]
i know that courier's policy toward stupid mailservers and stupid administrators has always been pretty straightforward, but here is a situation where the remote server is advertising TLS but isn't configured for it. courier doesn't fall back to non-TLS delivery in this situation: Jan 06 14:28:56 chemlab courierd: newmsg,id=D777.3C38A578.0A3B Jan 06 14:28:56 chemlab courierd: started,id=D777.3C38A578.0A3B,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],module=esmtp,host=charter.net,addr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 06 14:28:56 chemlab courierd: Waiting. shutdown time=none, wakeup time=Sun Jan 6 14:31:34 2002, queuedelivering=4, inprogress=1 Jan 06 14:28:56 chemlab courieresmtp: id=D777.3C38A578.0A3B,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],addr=[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 454 domain has no certificate Jan 06 14:28:56 chemlab courieresmtp: id=D777.3C38A578.0A3B,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],addr=[EMAIL PROTECTED],status: deferred Jan 06 14:28:56 chemlab courierd: completed,id=D777.3C38A578.0A3B Jan 06 14:28:56 chemlab courierd: Waiting. shutdown time=Sun Jan 6 14:33:56 2002, wakeup time=Sun Jan 6 14:31:34 2002, queuedelivering=4, inprogress=0 of course the mail just gets deferred, and i am certainly not going to disable TLS on my mailserver to deliver to one place : 220 dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net ESMTP CommuniGate Pro 3.4.6 EHLO eris.chemlab.org 250-dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net is pleased to meet you 250-HELP 250-PIPELINING 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-ATRN 250-STARTTLS 250-SIZE 104857600 250-AUTH=LOGIN 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 250-8BITMIME 250 EHLO STARTTLS 454 domain has no certificate can courier be set up to perform normal delivery if STARTTLS fails? -- http://chemlab.org - email [EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp public key chemlab radio!- drop out @ http://mp3.chemlab.org:8000 24-7-365 i could build anything if i could just find my tools.. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part