[courier-users] Fwd: Re: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

Hi Markus, I hope you don't mind me forwarding your email to the courier-users mailing-list. There are some users their that wold be very interested in uptodate packages for stretch that would hopefully also filter down to the ubuntu repos. Forwarded Message Subject: Re:

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

On 01/25/2017 06:33 PM, Ángel wrote: > As for the debian bug reports, the work seems to lie in the list of > normal unclassified bugs that would need to be reviewed and most likely > tested. If you are interested in bugs, you should also try to go look up all the bugs Ondrej closed too. he

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

As someone interested in keeping courier in Debian, I had been interested in looking at Ondřej changes (and its consequences) since I first saw this thread. I have now compiled the new packages and performed a (really basic) local install. I'm not too keen on the move of couriertls into

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

On 11/12/16 23:02, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > I'm not clear whether Ondřej's changes break compatibility with the > current package. If aiming at an incompatible repackaging, dropping > the existing packages and creating new ones can be easier. Call it > /renaming/ if you like. They are a

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

On 12/11/2016 02:02 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Sun 11/Dec/2016 12:51:00 +0100 Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: >> On 12/11/2016 03:12 AM, Mark Constable wrote: >>> On 11/12/16 03:09, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: On 07/12/16 00:04, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > I intend to properly orphan the

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

On Sun 11/Dec/2016 12:51:00 +0100 Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: > On 12/11/2016 03:12 AM, Mark Constable wrote: >> On 11/12/16 03:09, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: >>> On 07/12/16 00:04, Ondřej Surý wrote: I intend to properly orphan the packages before stretch release and remove them from

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

On 12/11/2016 03:12 AM, Mark Constable wrote: > On 11/12/16 03:09, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: >> On 07/12/16 00:04, Ondřej Surý wrote: >>> I have filled RFH (Request for Help) bug on courier package, but >>> nobody responded so far. Today I have changed that to RFA (Request >>> for Adoption) and I intend

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

On 11/12/16 03:09, SZÉPE Viktor wrote: > On 07/12/16 00:04, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> I have filled RFH (Request for Help) bug on courier package, but >> nobody responded so far. Today I have changed that to RFA (Request >> for Adoption) and I intend to properly orphan the packages before >> stretch

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

Hello Courier users! I could lend a hand to the maintainer for couple of hours/month. I am Courier user and I am able to put together simple, lintian-free packages https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/tree/master/security/myattackers-ipsets/ipset-persistent/debian Though I've never

[courier-users] Fwd: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages

Apologies if this is a repost but I couldn't find it in the courier-users@ archives. Forwarded Message Subject: Looking for new Debian maintainers for courier-mta packages Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:04:59 +0100 From: Ondřej Surý To:

[courier-users] Fwd: Cron <root@szerver4> /usr/local/sbin/syslog-errors-infrequent.sh

Hello! Could you help me where is the syntax error in this address? Jun 6 21:39:09 szerver4 courieresmtpd: error,relay=:::195.228.245.161,from=: 517 Syntax error. AFAIK this is a very high volume newsletter. Thanks. SZÉPE Viktor --

[courier-users] (fwd)

This is a development build of _courier_, _courier-imap_, _sqwebmail_, _maildrop_, and _cone_ packages. Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php The custom implementation of unicode-based character set mapping tables has been replaced by an iconv(3)-based implementation. This

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: Re: Auth daemon memory leak.

Hi, And my mail refused due to attachment, so I posted it here: http://www.kovoks.nl/authdaemond.log.gz Tom Albers KovoKs B.V. KvK: 1104 Citeren Tom Albers t...@kovoks.nl: Forward to mailing list since I received no reaction yet Best, Tom Albers KovoKs B.V. KvK: 1104

[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: forwarding broken after migration to courier]

Forgot to include the list... Incoming mail would be handled over SMTP, most probably, so Postfix would be the daemon to handle the .forward file. Khosrow Ebrahimpour wrote: On 19 November 2008 02:08, Sam Varshavchik wrote: If this was working before, than you were not using Courier.

[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: How to identify mails sent to an alias]

It seems that this didn't end up going to the list Original Message Without modifying the courier-mta package that comes in Debian stable, I have a VERY effective solution to alias use and determining which email was sent to whom. In my setup I have a MySQL database as

[courier-users] Fwd: Can't login to IMAP: pass MySQL authentication, permission denied

Hi all, I installed courier-imap-4.3.1 i with rpm built as vmail. Then i filed to login (as virtual user stored in MySQL) to IMAP. Here's my maillog: Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 imapd: Connection, ip=[:::203.125.189.34] Apr 23 08:46:42 mercury73 authdaemond: received auth request,

[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: authmysql vs apostrophe]

Sorry, sent this direct instead of to the list. Original Message Subject: Re: [courier-users] authmysql vs apostrophe From:Matt Comer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Fri, March 14, 2008 11:19 am To: Martin Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: authmysql vs apostrophe]

It should be up to authmysql to escape its input in order to prevent SQL injection. I doubt escaping differs much between different rdbms, but authmysql only supports mysql so that's not an issue. Postfix is using the same table and does not have a problem with apostrophes. I'll just add

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

tovis wrote: I can send/receive receive faxes - front end is apache2 and squirrelmail. For now I have stucked on faxmail. I was deleted the first line from default configuration file /etc/courier/faxrc (rw^ . 1), and check for faxmail, as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but result was an SMTP 513 error.

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

On 08 Mar 2008 19:30, tovis wrote: Do you have FAXRELAYCLIENT? Aha! May be this is the missing chain? I'm using Debian (latest stable), which provide me prebuilded packages, what are easy to install and configure. But some times (recommended mta for Debian is exim4) there are some

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

On 08 Mar 2008 19:30, tovis wrote: Do you have FAXRELAYCLIENT? Aha! May be this is the missing chain? I'm using Debian (latest stable), which provide me prebuilded packages, what are easy to install and configure. But some times (recommended mta for Debian is exim4) there are some

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Finally I succeed to send using email gateway :D Thank you Mark! - you turn me to the right way. There are some miscellanouse configurations to do, but finally it do what I'm awaiting for. I should say, that if I was read the hole documentation I should be gues this, but from other point I simply

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

On 08 Mar 2008 21:23, tovis wrote: I create a new file in this directory called default-fax and include only one raw for faxing: 127.0.0.1 allow.FAXRELAYCLIENT run makesmtpaccess but it gives me error Cannot store record for 127.0.0.1 - duplicate or out of disk space. How should look like

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

On 08 Mar 2008 21:23, tovis wrote: I create a new file in this directory called default-fax and include only one raw for faxing: 127.0.0.1 allow.FAXRELAYCLIENT run makesmtpaccess but it gives me error Cannot store record for 127.0.0.1 - duplicate or out of disk space. How should look like

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Am 2008-03-03 10:56:19, schrieb tovis: Lookup Debian refernce (9.6.1): ... use exim in Woody and use exim4 in Sarge. ... The only reasonable alternative MTA is postfix if you care about security sendmail and gmail are available as Debain packages but are not recommended: How to

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Am 2008-03-03 10:56:19, schrieb tovis: Lookup Debian refernce (9.6.1): ... use exim in Woody and use exim4 in Sarge. ... The only reasonable alternative MTA is postfix if you care about security sendmail and gmail are available as Debain packages but are not recommended: How to

[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: how to whitelist rbl blacklisted e-mail]

This was obviously intended to the list Original Message Subject:Re: [courier-users] how to whitelist rbl blacklisted e-mail Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:35:33 -0200 From: Enrique Verdes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alessandro Vesely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alessandro Vesely

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

On 3.3.2008 21:10, tovis wrote: I can not find even where I should put smarthost! Google smarthost courier. Reveals for example this jewel: http://archiver.mailfighter.net/courier-users/2007/Sep-Oct/0053.html Really nice! But I have no any files in /etc/courier called esmtproutes! Can

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

On Tuesday 04 March 2008, tovis wrote: On 3.3.2008 21:10, tovis wrote: I can not find even where I should put smarthost! Google smarthost courier. Reveals for example this jewel: http://archiver.mailfighter.net/courier-users/2007/Sep-Oct/0053.html Really nice! But I have no any files

[courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

After setting of smarthost, I have used one of my e-mail address, send a test. Thus is the result: UNDELIVERABLE MAIL Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fmx.freemail.hu [195.228.245.2]: 554-ironport2.freemail.hu 554

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Am 2008-02-28 11:20:33, schrieb tovis: - Eredeti üzenet - Tárgy: courier is good for me? Feladó: tovis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dátum: Csü, Február 28, 2008 11:19 Címzett: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2008-02-28 11:20:33, schrieb tovis: - Eredeti üzenet - Tárgy: courier is good for me? Feladó: tovis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dátum: Csü, Február 28, 2008 11:19 Címzett: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

I'm running a small SOHO (about 20 users for now), based on a server, running Debian stable with usuall services - samba, apache2 and PostgreSQL. I'm using exim4 (as mta), courier-imap and squirrelmail, for reliable, Why do you use exim as MTA? I run on all of my servers Debian GNU/Linux

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

I'm running a small SOHO (about 20 users for now), based on a server, running Debian stable with usuall services - samba, apache2 and PostgreSQL. I'm using exim4 (as mta), courier-imap and squirrelmail, for reliable, Why do you use exim as MTA? Lookup Debian refernce (9.6.1): ... use exim

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling -- courier's faxmail was not powerfull

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling -- courier's faxmail was not

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

tovis wrote: In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling -- courier's faxmail

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

tovis wrote: tovis wrote: In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went this way even I use courier-mta for mail handling --

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Am Montag, den 03.03.2008, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Aidas Kasparas: tovis wrote: In your situation I would write small script called from .forward (or whatever your MTA uses) which would get attachments and process them with hylafax (or whatever you intend to use as fax server). I went

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

As I suspected :( I can not find even where I should put smarthost! - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

On 3.3.2008 21:10, tovis wrote: I can not find even where I should put smarthost! Google smarthost courier. Reveals for example this jewel: http://archiver.mailfighter.net/courier-users/2007/Sep-Oct/0053.html esa -

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

On 3.3.2008 21:10, tovis wrote: I can not find even where I should put smarthost! Google smarthost courier. Reveals for example this jewel: http://archiver.mailfighter.net/courier-users/2007/Sep-Oct/0053.html Thanx! I will try this. esa

[courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

- Eredeti üzenet - Tárgy: courier is good for me? Feladó: tovis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dátum: Csü, Február 28, 2008 11:19 Címzett: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I'm running a

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Hi. First: I never used the fax module, so I have no clue if this might be what you want. On Thursday 28 February 2008, tovis wrote: I have been start struggling on courier documentation and realized that is it a large and complex mail server package, with a lots of configuration issues

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Setup exim4 as a smarthost using mta on Debian called as zero setup. There is small shell/perl questionary ned to answer about ten questions. - using smarthost, incoming emails are coming through SMTP or fetchmail - host name for mail susbsystem - listening interfaces for incoming SMTP connection

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Hi. On Thursday 28 February 2008, tovis wrote: Setup exim4 as a smarthost using mta on Debian called as zero setup. There is small shell/perl questionary ned to answer about ten questions. Well, 10 Things to configure is not zero, isn't it? Maybe the Debian developers did a good job to write

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Right. The answer for me, it is good for me but of course not some much obviouse to setup then exim4 on Debian. I should do some jb, but the result would be apropriate :) About the maintenance I do not mean only updates/upgrades - Debian do it very well, mostly automatic security updates are does.

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: FAM and Gamin problems

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Chuck Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # * IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=0 IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=1 You could try IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=0 ... jerry -- Girl with crimson nails - Jesus 'round her neck -U2

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: courier is good for me?]

Hi. On Thursday 28 February 2008, tovis wrote: I mean about blacklists, filters and other stuff top be safe - that no one will use my small server as a spam spreading/colleting box. If you don't open up SMTP to the outside world, you don't need any blacklist. Why do you compare a

[courier-users] Fwd: FAM and Gamin problems

Hi All, (Sorry if anybody gets this twice. I forget this membership was associated with an older email address so my first attempt was sent for moderation.) I have run a small courier implementation on a debian server for friends and family for the past few years. This uses local account

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Zombie process in courier]

Enrique Verdes escribió: Gordon Messmer escribió: Enrique Verdes wrote: Chequing for other thins I found a Zombie process in the sistem. Here's the ps output. ¿Somebody has seen this? How can I avoid it? 0 200 2471 2468 25 0 11008 4384 - S? 0:00

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Zombie process in courier]

Enrique Verdes wrote: fixed... I had an error in the indentation :-( Thanks a lot, Gordon. No problem. Thanks for reporting the bug. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Zombie process in courier]

Gordon Messmer a écrit : Enrique Verdes wrote: fixed... I had an error in the indentation :-( Thanks a lot, Gordon. No problem. Thanks for reporting the bug. Hello, Where is the latest CVS version ? (As my box has been hacked, I will have to destroy and rebuild it There is no

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]

Thank you for the help with this issue. Filtering is running smoothly. Attached is the Jérôme version of clamav.py, with the mail warning I added. Maybe can be of some use to somebody there. In case you have suggestions or improvements I'll be very thankfull if you let me know. Enrique.

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]

Jérôme Blion escribió: Jérôme Blion a écrit : Jérôme Blion a écrit : Courier and clamd are working as root... I meant daemon... lool I wrote too quickly... Definitely... I have to sleep... clamd is started as root and courier as daemon... :) With clamd running as root everything

[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]

Jérôme Blion escribió: Gordon Messmer a écrit : Enrique Verdes wrote: Gordon Messmer escribió: clamd probably doesn't have access to the mail spool unless you run it either as root, or as the same user that Courier uses. I encourage you to use the clamav.py filter from the

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]

Enrique Verdes a écrit : Jérôme Blion escribió: Gordon Messmer a écrit : Enrique Verdes wrote: Gordon Messmer escribió: clamd probably doesn't have access to the mail spool unless you run it either as root, or as the same user that Courier uses. I encourage you to use the clamav.py

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]

Jérôme Blion a écrit : Courier and clamd are working as root... I meant daemon... lool I wrote too quickly... - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Pythonfilter error.]

Jérôme Blion a écrit : Jérôme Blion a écrit : Courier and clamd are working as root... I meant daemon... lool I wrote too quickly... Definitely... I have to sleep... clamd is started as root and courier as daemon... :) Jerome Blion.

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Building RPM on Centos]

Wayne Pascoe wrote: On Wed, April 18, 2007 12:12 pm, Jay Lee wrote: Did you try installing the redhat-rpm-config RPM yet? Sam (the main developer of Courier) has previously recommended that to a person having an identical issue on FC5 and it resolved the problem. Heh - I just tried that :)

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Building RPM on Centos]

Gordon Messmer wrote: Wayne Pascoe wrote: On Wed, April 18, 2007 12:12 pm, Jay Lee wrote: Did you try installing the redhat-rpm-config RPM yet? Sam (the main developer of Courier) has previously recommended that to a person having an identical issue on FC5 and it resolved the problem.

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Re: Building RPM on Centos]

Jay Lee wrote: Gordon Messmer wrote: It'd be nice to see this in the FAQ, but don't think it can be made a standard BuildRequires item. It's not available for CentOS 5 x86, (and I assume RHEL 5 x86). I'm not sure under what situations it is available and required. Looks to me

[courier-users] Fwd: [DYNDNS #353270] your spf entry for your mailserver is brocken

Hi! Can someone help me with this spf problem. I've activated the spf stuff in courier with all settings to default. Do I've something wrong? -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [DYNDNS #353270] your spf entry for your mailserver is brocken Date: Wednesday 03 January 2007 03:52

[courier-users] Fwd: getpw in authlib fails for courier-mta after recent update

-- Forwarded message --From: Marcus Ilgner [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Jul 5, 2006 11:17 AM Subject: Re: [courier-users] getpw in authlib fails for courier-mta after recent updateTo: Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]On 7/5/06, Marcus Ilgner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/5/06, Stefan

[courier-users] Fwd: Maildrop

Hi, i need help with ldap + postfix + maildrop + courier. mi log is: Sep 13 13:11:16 mail2.ppp.es postfix/qmgr[7629]: [ID 197553 mail.info] D69E630878: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=780, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 13 13:11:17 mail2.ppp.es postfix/lmtp[7667]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 928E63087B:

[courier-users] [Fwd: Using LDAP quota for non-virtual users]

Hi all, Someone has some idea about??? I really want to use Courier, but without this function is impracticable... Regards, Fabiano Felix ---BeginMessage--- Hi All, I'm setting up a Postfix+Courier-Imap+Maildrop environment, which uses a pre-existent LDAP base (with Unix and Samba objects),

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: Using LDAP quota for non-virtual users]

Fabiano Felix wrote: Someone has some idea about??? I really want to use Courier, but without this function is impracticable... I'm setting up a Postfix+Courier-Imap+Maildrop environment, which uses a pre-existent LDAP base (with Unix and Samba objects), with non-virtual users. Adding the

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: authmysql - failed to connect to mysqlserver (server=localhost, user=vexim)]

Pascal Speck wrote: I have a big Problem with configuring my authmysql-system. When I try to get my mail via POP3 or IMAP, an error occours in the authmysql-system: failed to connect to mysqlserver (server=localhost, user=vexim) when I try to connect via mysql vexim -u vexim -p, there is no error

[courier-users] [Fwd: authmysql - failed to connect to mysqlserver (server=localhost, user=vexim)]

---BeginMessage--- Hello, I have a big Problem with configuring my authmysql-system. When I try to get my mail via POP3 or IMAP, an error occours in the authmysql-system: failed to connect to mysqlserver (server=localhost, user=vexim) when I try to connect via mysql vexim -u vexim -p, there is

[courier-users] Fwd: Having problem compiling the code

Does anyone know if my problem is related to having a version of the compiler and libaries that is too new for the latest version of Courier IMAP? I just came across an article related to another piece of software that suggested the software be compiled with a version not greater than N. I'm

[courier-users] [Fwd: New Contact Confirmation Request]

Is there any chance we can boot people off the list who do stuff like this? It is very annoying to have this message come back to me every time I post. Presumably I'll get yet another one of these as a result of this post, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be none the wiser because he'll never see it

[courier-users] Fwd: fetchitem() patch

Hi here is the problem which our developer discovered in imapd in last version of courier (courier-0.45.2 on FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p4) but sent it in wrong list ;-) This is a forwarded message From: Ondrej Jombik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday,

[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: courier-pop with maildir in /var/mail]

hi: (...) The function of /etc/courier/hosteddomains is very similar to the one of /etc/courier/locals. Both configuration files specify a list of domains that are considered to be local domains - domains whose mailboxes are stored locally. (...) check this url

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

Yes... strange! :-( This happened yesterday, I tried multiple times to post a message (always from the same account and same server) and they would bounce. I've seen this happen in the past. I don't know if I have something misconfigured with my server, it happens very rarely, and then towards

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

On Tuesday 09 December 2003 14:49, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: Is this a feature of courier, that it checks/verifies the sender address (which, btw, has always been a perfectly valid address) Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

--On Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2003 15:16 + Jeff Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 09 December 2003 14:49, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: Is this a feature of courier, that it checks/verifies the sender address (which, btw, has always been a perfectly valid address) Your message to the

[courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

  Hello, Does anyone know why I'm getting the error below? This started happening all of a sudden. The sender address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is a valid address... Is this an error message generated by courier? If so, how can courier be configured to test/check sender addresses? Also,

[courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I've moved my mail server from one machin to an other - all seemed to work except that noone can subscribe to our mailling list. There all getting a Invalid confirmation. message. I tried it even by myself. I get the same error message. I

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

--On Montag, 3. November 2003 09:43 +0100 Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I've moved my mail server from one machin to an other - all seemed to work except that noone can subscribe to our mailling list. There all getting a Invalid

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 03 November 2003 10:28, Roland wrote: I am shure there are several references to this problem in the I'm on this list now for 1,5 years and I did a full text search for Invalid confirmation and didn't get one single hit. I also entered:

Re: [courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

--On Montag, 3. November 2003 11:00 +0100 Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm on this list now for 1,5 years and I did a full text search for Invalid confirmation and didn't get one single hit. I also entered: Invalid confirmation courier into google and got no hit. There where

[courier-users] [Fwd: Re: [Evolution] IMAP Problem - verbose debug]

Can someone who knows a lot more about IMAP than I do help me with this. I am trying get Evolution to work with one of my IMAP accounts, and I have been told that the server is not working correctly? However, I have used other mail clients with that server without any problem? Original

[courier-users] (fwd) Re: maildir in Gnus vs. clock corrections and PID recycling

Paul Jarc found a problem with the new/time.inode.hostname approach, he suggests tagging the inode, such as new/1234567890.i4321.hermes, read below. -- Matthias Andree ---BeginMessage--- Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that Postfix, Courier and Maildrop will settle on using

[courier-users] Fwd: AUTH CRAM + PAM

Hi! Is there any way to use SMTP Auth CRAM-MD5 with authpam authentication module? Please CC me because I'm not (yet:) subscribed to the list... Thanks! --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: imap and ldap]

Does this affect my courier-imap lookup? if so, what should i do? if not, then could you please give me any suggestions? No, I asked the same question on the OpenLDAP list a few months back. Hi all, i am still having trouble connecting courier and ldap, and i think my problem is ldap

[courier-users] Fwd from bugtraq: SECURITY.NNOV: Courier CPU exhaustion + bonus on imap-uw

This was posted on BugTraq this afternoon, in case anybody hasn't seen it. -ScottG. From: 3APA3A [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SECURITY.NNOV: Courier CPU exhaustion + bonus on imap-uw To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: VULN-DEV [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 16:14:15 +0400 Reply-To: 3APA3A

[courier-users] Fwd: courier-pop3d AUTHFAILURE

i figured out that when i am starting /usr/lib/courier-imap/pop3d.rc start it works and pop3d daemon is launched without errors, ... so why does courier-pop3d produce this error and pop3d.rc doesnt? strange... stefan. Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 11:48:42 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: stefan

[courier-users] Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.

Hi! what does tell me that error message? and what do need it to change in order that it works? -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: NOTICE: mail delivery status. Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 18:20:40 -0500 From: Courier mail server at outertech.com To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a

Re:[courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these?

sysop == sysop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Use rbl from relays.osirusoft.com. sysop Attached is a txt file with headers from a few messages sysop getting sent to one of my users what would you guys put sysop in your bofh file? Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sysop

Re:[courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you blockthese?

On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote: relays.osirusoft.com is not to be trusted. Joe Jared, who runs it, is going down the same road as Alan Brown, entering spite listing into the zone that do not belong there. This is why I pulled preconfigured settings for relays.osirusoft.com

Re: [courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these?

Sam Varshavchik wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Sysop wrote: Attached is a txt file with headers from a few messages getting sent to one of my users what would you guys put in your bofh file? Nothing. I would block the actual source of the spew, via smtpaccess. Hrmm, this is what I'm after.

RE: [courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these?

Ordb.org runs a good one, it only lists open relays, not input or output-only relays, just true open relays. -Original Message- From: Juha Saarinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:51 PM To: Sam Varshavchik Cc: Courier Subject: Re:[courier-users] [Fwd

RE: [courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these?

. -Original Message- From: Juha Saarinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:51 PM To: Sam Varshavchik Cc: Courier Subject: Re:[courier-users] [Fwd: headers for spammers] how would you block these? On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote

[courier-users] [Fwd: stupid mail servers, broken STARTTLS fallback]

i know that courier's policy toward stupid mailservers and stupid administrators has always been pretty straightforward, but here is a situation where the remote server is advertising TLS but isn't configured for it. courier doesn't fall back to non-TLS delivery in this situation: Jan 06